The present invention relates to insoles and, in particular, replacement soles for footwear having improved cushioning and anatomical centering assistance.
Much of the footwear sold today includes replaceable insoles. Replaceable insoles offer the user several benefits which include the ability to replace worn insoles, the ability to select an insole which is specifically designed for the requirements of the user, e.g., running, prolonged standing, fallen arches, etc. Many replaceable insoles are made utilizing a foam material which over time can lose its cushioning properties due to compaction from use and normal wear and tear. Thus, replaceable insoles allow a consumer to maintain the benefits of the insole by replacing worn out insoles.
Replaceable insoles can be made in individual sizes corresponding to shoe size or made in a limited number of sizes and the insole can be trimmed down to the desired size. Replaceable insoles have been designed to fulfill specific purposes such as shock absorption, and structures intended to facilitate the proper orthopedic placement of the foot, support for fallen arches, etc. Frequently, insole designs intended to assist in the proper alignment of the foot, or to address other orthopedic concerns, have involved more complex construction than insoles designed only to provide cushioning. The more complex construction frequently uses additional features such as stiff components to assist and maintain the proper orientation of the foot.
One advantage of making replaceable insoles in individual sizes, corresponding to shoe sizes, is that the more complex designs to produce particular orthopedic results can be utilized more effectively. In the past, it has been difficult to make a multi-sized insole which included rather rigid support elements to achieve certain orthopedic results. The disadvantage of producing replaceable insoles in individual sizes include requiring a mold for each size, requiring inventory and marketing support for all sizes of shoes, increased requirement for retail display space, and other production and marketing disadvantages. In addition, insole designs having relatively stiff components even when made to each shoe design, many times do not properly fit all shoes of a particular size because of differences in shoe designs used by the various manufacturers. The benefit of multi-sized replaceable insoles include reduced numbers of molds, reduced inventory requirements and retail display space. The disadvantage of previous multi-sized replaceable insoles has been that it was difficult to effectively incorporate features designed to achieve orthopedic benefits.
Thus, there has been a need for a multi-sized replaceable insole design which can utilize relatively stiff support members and yet properly fit in a variety of different sized shoes. Also, there has been a need for a replaceable insole design that includes relatively stiff support members that can better fit a particular shoe size to account for differences in shoe designs from the various manufacturers.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to an insole made from a base which defines the shape of an insole and has a top and bottom side. The insole has a lateral side (outside of the foot) and a medial side (inside of the foot). A medial anatomical centering member is positioned along the medial side of the base and extends from about the front of the arch to the heel. A lateral anatomical centering member is positioned along the lateral side of the base and extends along the side portion of the insole adjacent to the talus and the calcaneus. These anatomical centering devices are made of a relatively stiff but flexible material. In a preferred embodiment, the insole also includes one or more shock absorbing pads on the bottom surface. Preferably, there are two shock absorbing pads. The first shock absorbing pad is shaped to provide cushioning in the area of the center of the calcaneus and which extends along the lateral side portion of the talus. Another pad is shaped so that it provides cushioning under the joints of the metatarsals and the proxima phalanges and has a portion which extends along the fifth metatarsal. Preferably, the shock absorbing cushioning pads have a plurality of passageways to facilitate air flow in and out of the shock pad. Also, in a preferred embodiment the base defines a plurality of directional air ports which extend through the base and the top sheet attached to the base. The air ports are shaped so as to facilitate a directional pumping action by the action of the foot during rocking to circulate air above and below the insole. In a further preferred embodiment, the top sheet is a low coefficient of friction fabric having a vapor barrier film attached to the side adhered to the base.
The present invention will be better understood with reference to the accompanying drawing in conjunction with the detailed description. The drawings in the detailed description are of preferred embodiments of the invention and, thus, are not to be considered limiting.
In
In a preferred embodiment, the top sheet 26 is a non-woven fabric layer 132 with a film laminated 134 to the back side. This film serves as a barrier so that liquid foam used in molding the base does not penetrate the fabric during the molding operation. This same film will also act as a moisture barrier between the fabric and the foam in use. In a preferred embodiment, the fabric is treated with an antibacterial agent, which in combination with the moisture barrier reduces odor causing bacteria and fungus. Also, preferably the fabric has a low coefficient of friction so as to minimize the possibility of blisters. Suitable materials for the fabric layer include polyester and nylon. Suitable materials for the film include polyurethanes and acrylics.
The base of the insole is preferably molded using a foam which has cushioning properties substantially the same as the fatty pads of the foot. Preferably, the foam is a polyurethane foam which has a durometer (hardness) of preferably from about 75 to about 80 on the “00” Shore gauge. The base preferably has a thickness of about 0.170 inches in the toe area and a thickness of about 0.380 inches in the heel area. The base preferably provides a cushioning value from about 14 to about 17 (peak-G) on an Exeter Impact Tester. Also, in the preferred embodiment is illustrated the foam molded on the top surface in a shape such that the insole shapes the natural shape of the foot.
The forward shock pad and the rear shock pad may be molded in place or separately. Preferably, for ease of construction, the shock absorbing pads are molded separately and glued into the recesses on the molded base. The shock pads are preferably made from a polyurethane foam. The shock pads of the thickest part are approximately 0.220 inches thick, the forefoot of the base is about 0.120 inches in thickness and the reduced thickness areas of the pad are about 0.060 inches in thickness. Each of the shock pads incorporate a plurality of 120–500 perforations. These passageways serve to increase the airflow in and out of the pad. Each passageway in a preferred embodiment is about 0.030 inches to 0.020 inches in diameter, and they are spaced from 0.090 to 0.100 inches apart. Also, airflow within the pad and around the insole is aided by the directional air circulation ports that are molded into the base of the insole and are positioned in front and in rear of the forward shock pad. These circulation air ports have a truncated cone shape as shown in
The foreward shock pad in the preferred embodiment includes an extension on the lateral side which extends rearward to provide cushioning in the impact zones of the cuboid and fifth metatarsal. In a preferred embodiment the forward shock pad has a durometer (hardness) from about 70 to about 75 on the “00” Shore gauge, and a thickness of about 0.140 inches at the thickest portion and about 0.045 inches at the thinnest portion.
In addition to the air ports, the chamfered perimeter of the recesses and of the shock absorbing pads allow for increased airflow in and out of the pad by providing a channel for airflow. With each step the foot forces air through the top surface air ports and at the bottom of the insole via the elliptical exhaust ports. The elliptical shape of the air ports direct the air on the bottom side of the base both forward and rearward which in addition to facilitating airflow in and out of the shock pads, also helps to cool the foot and dissipate moisture.
The rear shock pad is a preferred embodiment made of a similar or same material as the forward shock pad. This pad can also be molded separately and then glued into the recess of the molded base. The rear shock pad is typically thicker than the forward shock pad so as to help cushion the extreme force of heel strikes. In a preferred embodiment the rear shock pad has a durometer (hardness) from about 65 to about 70 on the “00” Shore gauge and a thickness of about 0.220 inches at the thickest portion and about 0.110 inches at the thinnest portion. Like the forward shock pad, the rear shock pad includes an expansion type joint at the edge and chamfered sides to allow expansion of the material during impact. This feature aids the different materials used for the pads and base which preferably have different densities to expand and is very useful in the absorption and dispersion of impact energy. The rear shock pad, in addition to providing cushioning to the calcaneus, also has an additional area which targets the loading of the talus.
The two anatomical centering devices are provided on each side of the rear of the insole. The lateral anatomical centering device begins at a point between the cuboid and the talus joint and proceeds around a portion of the heel, and preferably extends around to approximately the mid-point of the rear of the heel. The medial anatomical correction device begins in the heel and extends preferably from the rear portion of the heel past the arch and ends along the side of the first metatarsal. A space is provided between the medial and lateral anatomical correction devices to facilitate fitting the insole into different size and designed shoes.
Preferably, the anatomical centering devices are made from a stiff material which has some rigidity. In a preferred embodiment the anatomical center devices have a durometer (hardness) from about 90 to about 100 on the “00” Shore gauge, and a thickness at the thickest portion of about 0.100 inches and about 0.070 inches at the thinnest portion. Thus, channels 130 preferrably have a depth of about 0.030 inches. While the material is stiff, it is still flexible. Preferably, on the outside of the anatomical centering device are ribs. The space 40 between the anatomical centering devices is preferably from about 0.2 to 0.5 inches. These allow areas where parts of the shoe can be pressed into the spaces to provide and allow fit in different shoes. The anatomical correction devices are preferably injected molded in the shape of a J or reverse J, depending on the side of the insole. The shape and stiffness of the anatomical correction device transfers up and into the base of the insole creating a heel cupped in a raised arch area. The heel cup feature of the anatomical correction device helps stablize the foot and keep it centered and contained over the rearward or the heel shock absorbing pad. Also, it provides support for the arch area and is designed to lift and support the brebis muscles, ligaments and tendons of the foot.
The preferred materials for the various components are:
While the present invention has been described in relation to preferred embodiments, the detailed description is not limiting of the invention and other modifications will be obvious to one skilled in the art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
360127 | Wallis | Mar 1887 | A |
892360 | Burns | Jun 1908 | A |
2224642 | Burns | Dec 1940 | A |
2985971 | Murawski | May 1961 | A |
3922801 | Zente | Dec 1975 | A |
4033054 | Fukuoka | Jul 1977 | A |
4108928 | Swan, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4123855 | Thedford | Nov 1978 | A |
4150455 | Fukuoka | Apr 1979 | A |
4219945 | Rudy et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4229546 | Swan, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4237626 | Brown | Dec 1980 | A |
4346205 | Hiles | Aug 1982 | A |
4435910 | Marc | Mar 1984 | A |
4541184 | Leighton | Sep 1985 | A |
4541186 | Mulvihill | Sep 1985 | A |
4557060 | Kawashima | Dec 1985 | A |
4581187 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4597196 | Brown | Jul 1986 | A |
4616430 | McQuiggin | Oct 1986 | A |
4619056 | Lin et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4627178 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4627179 | McElroy | Dec 1986 | A |
4633598 | Moronaga et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4674204 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4694589 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4694831 | Seltzer | Sep 1987 | A |
4744157 | Dubner | May 1988 | A |
4756949 | Spence et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4793078 | Andrews | Dec 1988 | A |
4808469 | Hiles | Feb 1989 | A |
4841648 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4910886 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4977691 | Orchard, III | Dec 1990 | A |
5092060 | Frachey et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5152081 | Hallenbeck et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5155927 | Bates et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5174049 | Flemming | Dec 1992 | A |
5175946 | Tsai | Jan 1993 | A |
5233768 | Humphreys | Aug 1993 | A |
5233769 | Weber | Aug 1993 | A |
D341023 | Frederick | Nov 1993 | S |
5319867 | Weber | Jun 1994 | A |
5384974 | Massimo | Jan 1995 | A |
5404659 | Burke et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5438768 | Bauerfeind | Aug 1995 | A |
5463824 | Barna | Nov 1995 | A |
5509218 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5551173 | Chambers | Sep 1996 | A |
5553398 | Schnewlin-Maier | Sep 1996 | A |
5619809 | Sessa | Apr 1997 | A |
5664342 | Buchsenschuss | Sep 1997 | A |
5685094 | Lin | Nov 1997 | A |
5722186 | Brown | Mar 1998 | A |
5771606 | Litchfield et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6082023 | Dalton | Jul 2000 | A |
6176025 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192607 | Kolada et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233847 | Brown | May 2001 | B1 |
6301805 | Howlett et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301807 | Gardiner | Oct 2001 | B1 |
20020007569 | Crane et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030093920 | Greene et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2603716 | Dec 1976 | DE |
3227505 | Jan 1984 | DE |
3330060 | Feb 1985 | DE |
200 11 334 | Jan 2001 | DE |
0411598 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0619084 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0820706 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1515810 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2 039 716 | Aug 1980 | GB |
2061172 | May 1981 | GB |
2221378 | Feb 1990 | GB |
1653724 | Jun 1991 | SU |
WO9528103 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 0072714 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040118017 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |