Traditional insoles for footwear are made out of a compression material such as foam. While foam offers some comfort level to a wearer's foot, it generally does not conform to the entire foot of the wearer and will therefore support only certain pressure points. As a result, users often have trouble finding shoes that are consistently comfortable for the user, as certain traditional insoles will fit better for some users then others.
Another downside of foam insoles is that sweat from the foot tends to collect on the foam as it does not allow for the circulation of air around the foot.
It is therefore the principal object of the present invention to produce an insole, which provides a customized fit for all wearers.
It is another object for the present invention to provide an insole, which provides for a reduction in sweat buildup on the insole.
An insole is provided that is constructed out of a mesh material that is stretched and suspended over a cavity formed in a shoe. The mesh surrounds a foam base and a rigid frame positioned under the foam base. The foam base is shaped so that a cavity is formed between the top surface of the foam base and the mesh positioned over the foam base to provide a “trampoline” effect for a wearer's foot.
In another embodiment the mesh material is secured to the upper of a shoe. The interior of the sole of the shoe is shaped to form a cavity between the mesh layer and a foam layer in the sole of the shoe so that when the upper is secured to the sole the wearer of the shoe can experience the “trampoline” effect.
These and other features and objects of the present invention will be more fully from the following detailed description which should be read in light of the accompanying drawings in which corresponding reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Referring to
A secure cover 18 is positioned under the suspension mesh enclosure 16. The secure cover 18 provides two functions. A structurally secure cover 18 ensures that the “glove” components do not shift and move after the suspension mesh enclosure 16 is pressure fit over the preassembled foam base 12 and rigid frame 14. The secure cover 18 also conceals stitching of the “glove” construction and the split opening 20 of the suspension mesh enclosure 16.
Referring to
The construction of the insole 10 of the present invention described above provides two key advantages for the wearer. First, the mesh of the suspension mesh enclosure 16 provides a customized fit as it will warp to follow the contour of the wearer's foot, yielding to pressure points and giving support to the wearer, where uniquely needed. It has the effect similar to that of standing on a trampoline where the suspension mesh enclosure 16 will conform around the unique topography of an individual foot as shown in
In an alternate embodiment shown in
While a variety of types of mesh could be utilized in the present invention, in one preferred embodiment, a static mesh is utilized. Static mesh is particularly well-suited because the focus point of impact (which is at the bottom of the foot) exerts increased tension on the mesh. In addition, the space allotted for vertical give of the mesh in the construction of the insole, is limited by the interior volume of the shoe, as well as toe to heel lift, which in most cases is a maximum of 15 mm. The rigid frame 14 itself also has an inherent amount of give, depending upon design of the frame (sidewall angles and contours) as well as the durometer and material composition of the frame. Control over the give of the mesh layer (if necessary) can then be achieved by changing the design of the frame and material composition.
In a preferred embodiment, the mesh is pulled as taught as the material properties will allow without compromising the structural integrity of these materials. In one preferred embodiment, the mesh material is made of polyester in longer fibers. Such longer fibers, which are also known as continuous fibers, have a general aspect ratio (defined as the ratio of fiber length to diameter) of between 200 and 500. The longer fiber is essential in that it can withstand the pull strength.
In one embodiment, the mesh is made from a strong breathable mesh sold by Chang Sing Co. Ltd. under the fabric code CS366. Such a mesh is knitted on a Tricot-machine made in Germany and sold by Liebers. The fiber that is used in the mesh is a 150 den/48 filament (50% trilobal shiny yarn and 50% semi-dull yarn). This yarn, which is referred to as a virgin polyester yarn, can be obtained from Nanya Plastics Corporation. Of course many other mesh materials can be used if they display similar properties.
In another embodiment, the mesh is knit on a CNC Knitting Machine (such as Stoll v-bed weft-knitting machine) of multiple interconnected layers within a single seamless textile, often referred to as 3D knitting or shaping. With the additional ability to utilize multiple yarns ranging in quality from elastic to structural, the CNC Knitting Machine allows for the production of textiles with great degrees of differentiation in material characteristics and geometry to accommodate infinite adjustability and personal customization for the wearer (for example, if a wearer requires greater support on the medial side of the foot to offset pronation, the suspension mesh may be knit with a static thread and dense geometry on the medial side of the heel).
Turning now to
In the embodiment of
A CNC Knitting Machine (described above) may also be used to produce the upper 26 and mesh lasting board 24 combined as a single 3D knit seamless textile part.
While the foregoing invention has been described with reference to its preferred embodiments, various alterations and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art. All such alterations and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application relates to and claims priority under U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/299587, titled “INSOLE WITH SUSPENDED MESH SURFACE,” which was filed on Feb. 25, 2016 and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1880654 | Baird | Oct 1932 | A |
2119850 | Bauer | Jun 1938 | A |
2662309 | Morton | Dec 1953 | A |
2812570 | Petersilie | Nov 1957 | A |
2917844 | Scholl | Dec 1959 | A |
2917848 | Scholl | Dec 1959 | A |
3170178 | Scholl | Feb 1965 | A |
5561920 | Graham et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5680714 | Lopez | Oct 1997 | A |
5974695 | Slepian et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
20060277696 | Kendall | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as International Searching Authority, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2017/019450, dated May 4, 2017 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170245591 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62299587 | Feb 2016 | US |