INSPECTION AND RECYCLING OF CONTAINERS

Abstract

A method for examining filled containers, which are filled with CO2-containing products such as beer or lemonade, for contaminants such as glass fragments, including examining, e.g. by means of a camera, a container for gas bubbles in the product/in the container and/or for gas mists in the container, and sorting out the container, if gas bubbles are determined in the product and/or if CO2 mists are determined in the container, and re-examining the container at a later time.

Description

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure relates to a system and a method for inspecting filled containers, e.g. bottles, whose content may e.g. be charged with CO₂.

BACKGROUND

DE 102 57 749 B4 discloses an inspection machine that inspects containers, which are filled with a product and closed, for contaminants, e.g. glass fragments. To this end, the container is first caused to rotate about its own axis until the product, the liquid, (partially) follows the rotation. Subsequently, the container is stopped while the liquid continues to rotate. In this condition, the container is illuminated and observed by means of a camera. In this so-called spin-stop process, the motion of the liquid cannot be seen in the camera image, whereas the contaminant and its motion are visible.

Contaminants may be the following ones: glass fragments or other solid matter that are not desired in the product, in particular glass fragments are dangerous to the consumer.

WO9714956A1 discloses that, depending on the CO₂ content and the degree of dissolution of the CO₂ in the product, fine gas bubbles may form in CO₂-containing products, such as beer, cola, lemonade and others, during rotation about the bottle's own axis. These gas bubbles as well as possible foreign bodies move in the product and in a bottle, respectively. Differentiating gas bubbles and foreign bodies according to the above-mentioned spin-stop method is hardly possible in such cases.

The possibility that bottles may be discharged/sorted out by mistake due to gas bubbles instead of foreign bodies is given. This could be minimized through a long dwell time between filling and inspection, but this necessitates long transport distances or very large bulk conveyors. Such technical retrofitting is, moreover, complicated and leads to an increase in production costs.

The formation of undesired gas bubbles in CO₂-containing products may be caused not only by the inspection process itself but also by various other disturbances in a CO₂-containing product in the course of its production cycle.

Task

It is therefore the object of the present disclosure to provide an apparatus and a method, which improve/minimize the error rate during inspection/examination of containers that are filled with CO₂-containing products, such as beer, cola or lemonade.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

For the sake of completeness, it should here be mentioned that, when containers are referred to in the following, filled containers are meant, in particular containers filled with CO₂-containing products.

During the examination of filled containers, which are filled with CO₂-containing products such as beer or lemonade, for contaminants such as glass fragments, the containers can be examined for gas bubbles in the product/in the container and/or for a gas mist in the product/in the container. If this examination results in a determination of gas bubbles in the product/container and/or of gas mists in the product/container, these containers can first be sorted out, so as to be examined at least once more, before they either pass the renewed examination for contaminants without being objected to or before they are sorted out and removed from the production process once and for all.

This has the advantage that containers, which, although they contain gas bubbles in the product or a gas mist, are not contaminated, can be re-examined later on. During the period between two examinations, possibly existing gas bubbles or gas mists in the container may disappear in that they dissolve again in the product. Containers, which are not contaminated, but which only contained gas bubbles in the product and/or a gas mist during a first examination, and which are found to be deficiency-free/contaminant-free during renewed examination, can be recycled into the production process. The error rate of containers, which are not contaminated and which are discharged and removed from the production process by mistake, can thus be reduced in comparison with processes in which, e.g. in response to a detection of gas bubbles in the product, the containers in question are removed from the production process without renewed examination.

Containers in which contaminants, such as glass fragments, have been determined during the first examination, can, of course, be discharged/sorted out after the first examination and removed from the further production process once and for all, whereas containers in which neither contaminants nor gas bubbles in the product nor gas mists have been detected, can pass the examination without being objected to and advanced to further steps in the production process.

The examination of containers, which are filled with CO₂-containing products, for contaminants, such as glass fragments, can be executed by means of optical/infrared/photometric and/or light-microscopic methods, such as bright-field and/or dark-field microscopy, phase-contrast, interference-contrast, fluorescence, polarization and confocal microscopy, within the framework of a spin-stop process of the type mentioned at the beginning and described in WO97/14956A1. During spin-stop processes, the container is caused to rotate, so that the content of the container starts to rotate. Subsequently, when the container has been stopped, two, three or more successive pictures are taken, in the case of which the container content moved between two respective pictures, whereas the container did not move (with respect to the camera). By comparing the two pictures, conclusions can be drawn with respect to moving contaminants and/or gas bubbles. The spin-stop process can be executed while the containers are positioned on a carousel comprising a plurality of accommodation sites for containers, at which a respective one of the containers can be caused to rotate.

The differentiation between contaminants, gas bubbles in the product/in the container can be based e.g. on an analysis of a color/gray level spectrum with respect to contrast and/or brightness and/or color/gray level values in a camera image. It is e.g. possible to define threshold values in the differences and/or ratios of brightness and/or contrast between an object, for example a contaminant (e.g. a piece of broken glass), a gas bubble and the product, i.e. the content provided in the container.

The identification/classification of various objects in the container can be defined e.g. through a brightness threshold value that is exceeded or underrun e.g. by at least 1, 10, 100% with respect to the difference of the brightness of objects, e.g. objects/areas in the order of magnitude of at least 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 20 mm (or more), in comparison with the product/container content provided.

The position of detected objects within the container as well as their number and/or spatial dimensions may also/additionally be used for determining/identifying the objects in the container. For example, a minimum number of 10, 100 or 1000 objects with spatial dimensions, e.g. in an order of magnitude of at least 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 20 mm, and/or dwell positions of objects in the container within predetermined image areas may be used for classifying objects as gas bubbles and/or contaminants.

In the case of a large number of gas bubbles, it may perhaps no longer be possible to identify them individually, since they appear collectively as a mist. The presence of such a gas mist may e.g. be defined in that on a camera image, or on an image derived from one or a plurality of camera images, e.g. at the center of the container, large areas (having spatial dimensions of at least 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 cm) underrun or exceed a color and/or gray value and/or brightness and/or contrast threshold value with respect to the provided product/container content by e.g. at least 1, 10, 100%, and/or in that said large areas exhibit a variation/variations of less than a maximum of 40, 30, 10% with respect to the mean value or median of the distribution of color and/or gray values and/or brightness and/or contrast values within said large areas, and/or the large areas with values for color and/or gray values and/or brightness and/or contrast values deviating from the container product in above-described way follow the inner contour of the container as regards their shape.

The detection of a gas mist in the product can be executed on the basis of a single recorded image, without a difference between two images from the spin-stop process being necessary. For detecting individual contaminants or gas bubbles, a differential image originating e.g. from a spin-stop process should preferably be evaluated.

Instead of using threshold values, which concern the contrast and/or brightness and/or color/gray level value in a camera image or in an image derived from one or a plurality of camera images, for classifying various objects or various areas in a filled container, also ranges of values for contrast and/or brightness and/or color/gray level values may be used.

It is also imaginable to classify/identify various objects, or various areas in a filled container, through infrared images, on the basis of different temperatures of the objects/large areas in the filled container. Also in this case, threshold values and ranges of values can be defined, e.g. threshold values for differences in temperature of at least 0.1, 0.5, 10, 20° C.

Likewise or additionally, objects in the container can be classified on the basis of their shape. Objects in the container may, by way of example, be identified as gas bubbles, if the numerical eccentricity of their projected contour in the camera image, or in an image derived from one or a plurality of camera images, is not larger than e.g. 0.1, 0.2, 0.3.

After an examination of containers, which are filled with CO₂-containing products, such as beer, cola or lemonade, and in which gas bubbles were detected in the product/container and/or contaminants were detected in the container, these containers can be marked, e.g. by an imprint or a label. A possible continuous circulation of rejected containers in the production process can thus be avoided. If contaminants are detected, the containers can be discharged once and for all (even if they have been neither marked nor labeled).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The figures exemplarily show the following:

FIG. 1: is an isometric view of a system for examining filled containers.

FIG. 2: is a plan view of an inspection of a filled container.

FIG. 3: is a plot of frequencies of various grey levels, within a filled container, by which images may be evaluated.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 shows exemplarily a system A for inspecting whether filled containers, which are filled with CO₂-containing products such as beer or lemonade, contain contaminants such as glass fragments. A measurement unit M may here examine a container with a camera K, the container undergoing e.g. a spin-stop process through the container treatment unit S. Depending on the result of the examination, the measurement unit can advance an examined container to one of the three container guides, e.g. to container conveyor belts R, M or C. Instead of container conveyor belts also other transport facilities may be provided, e.g. facilities provided with movable grippers for gripping the containers.

A non-rejected container, in which neither contaminants nor gas bubbles in the product nor gas mists in the container were detected, may leave the measurement unit M, e.g. on conveyor belt C, and may be advanced to the next production step.

Containers in which contaminants, such as pieces of broken glass, were detected and/or containers in which gas bubbles in the product or gas mists in the containers were detected again, can be discharged/removed from the production process via the conveyor belt F.

The examination of the containers can lead e.g. to three different detection results, e.g. “free from contaminants”, “contaminated” and “contains bubbles and/or mists”. Depending on the detection result, the respective containers are advanced in different ways.

Containers in which gas bubbles in the product and/or gas mists in the container were detected during a first examination can be recycled via a conveyor belt R for renewed examination through the measurement unit M. It is, however, also imaginable that the conveyor belt R may lead such containers to some other measurement unit that is different from said measurement unit M.

Likewise, the system A for examining filled containers may include a parking station in which filled containers, which were sorted out for renewed examination for contaminants, can, prior to said renewed examination for contaminants, be parked e.g. for periods of at least 0.1, 1, 10, 100 h. The supply to the parking station may take place e.g. via the conveyor belt R or a further additional conveyor belt RZ (or other container transport facilities). This is advantageous insofar as the period between two examinations of the same filled container for contaminants can be controlled, irrespectively of and/or in addition to the conveying speed of the conveyor belts/of a conveyor belt.

FIG. 2 shows exemplarily a container B filled with a product P and closed with a closure Z. A gas mist N is shown, which is composed of many gas bubbles that can no longer be resolved individually by a camera image. In addition, gas bubbles G as well as contaminants D are exemplarily identified.

Through the container bottom, light L falls exemplarily into the container B, so that the content of the container can be examined. The light L may also impinge on the container from the side or from above. A camera K, which is exemplarily arranged on the side and which is additionally able to move e.g. along the direction of movement W, is capable of taking pictures of the container and/or its content.

The inner side Ji of the container wall J, which is connected to the lower side ZU of the closure, defines the inner contour of the container.

FIG. 3 shows a diagram, which illustrates exemplarily various evaluation possibilities of pictures of a container to be examined for contaminants, said pictures being e.g. pictures taken by a camera/derived pictures. For example, the X-axis may represent various gray levels in an examination image and the Y-axis may represent the frequencies of the gray levels. The frequency distribution of the gray levels, for example, may here be represented/used as a histogram H, or e.g. an interpolation I of the histogram H. By defining threshold values such as K1x and/or K1y or ranges of values K1x+Δx and/or K1y+Δy, it is thus possible to define gray level threshold values and/or ranges of gray level values so as to identify/classify various objects in the container, e.g. gas mists. Analogously, the X-axis may represent color grades, contrast/brightness levels, wavelength, frequency etc., and the Y-axis may represent e.g. intensity, power spectral density, etc Likewise, the threshold values K1xK1y and the ranges of values K1x+Δx and/or K1y+Δy may represent the above-mentioned magnitudes.

Followed by X sheets with X figures, in which the following reference numerals are used:

A apparatus/system for inspecting/examining containers filled with CO₂-containing products.

B, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 filled containers/receptacles.

C container conveyor belt/conveyor belt for advancing non-rejected containers.

F container conveyor belt/conveyor belt for discharging rejected containers from the production process.

R container conveyor belt/conveyor belt/recycling belt for recycling containers for renewed examination for contaminants.

S container treatment unit for spin-stop process.

T container conveying direction.

K camera, e.g. infrared camera, video camera, photo camera, etc.

N gas mist.

G gas bubbles.

D contaminants, e.g. pieces of broken glass, glass fragments.

P product/content provided in the container.

Z closure of the container.

ZU lower side of the closure of the container.

O surface of the product/content provided in the container.

L light.

U container bottom.

J container wall

Ji inner side of the container wall.

W degree of freedom/direction of movement for the camera.

H histogram.

I interpolation curve of the histogram H.

X ordinate of an image evaluation diagram, e.g. gray levels, color grades, contrast/brightness levels, wavelength, frequency, etc.

Y abscissa of an image evaluation diagram, e.g. frequency, intensity, power spectral density, etc.

Klx threshold value for ordinate magnitude.

Kly threshold value for abscissa magnitude.

Δx, Δy desired range of values for analysis of an ordinate/abscissa magnitude.

Claims

1. A method for examining filled containers which are filled with CO2-containing products for contaminants, comprising examining a container for gas bubbles at least one of in a product with which the container is filled; in the container; or in gas mists in the product or container, and sorting out the container if at least one of gas bubbles are identified in the product or container, or if gas mists are determined in the product/container, and re-examining the sorted out container of a later time.

2. The method according to claim 1, and examining each of the filled containers includes a spin-stop process.

3. The method according to claim 1, further, comprising that gas bubbles in the product/container are determined if at least one of: a minimum number of objects is detected in at least one of the product or the container; objects are detected in at least one of the product or container having spatial dimensions of at least 0.01 mm; or said objects are detected at predetermined dwell positions.

4. The method according to claim 1, comprising that gas mists in the product/container are determined in that on a camera image of the container or on an image derived from one or from a plurality of camera images, areas with spatial dimensions of at least 0.1, cm, underrun or exceed at least one of a color value, a gray value, a brightness, or a contrast threshold value with respect to the provided product/container content by at least 1%, or that gas mists in the product/container are determined in that said large areas exhibit a variation/variations of less than a maximum of 40% with respect to one of a mean value or median of the distribution of at least one of color values, gray values, brightness values, or contrast values within said large areas, or the large areas with values for color and/or gray values and/or brightness and/or contrast values deviating from the container product in above-described way follow the inner contour of the container as regards their shape.

5. The method according to claim 1, comprising that objects in the container are classified on the basis of their shape, objects in the container being classifiable as gas bubbles if the numerical eccentricity of their projected contour in the camera image, or in an image derived from at least one camera image, is not larger than at least 0.1.

6. The method according to claim 1 comprising that gas bubbles in the product and/or gas mists in the container and/or contaminants in the container are determined in that threshold values for temperature differences of at least 0.1° C. are used for differentiating between at least one of classifying the various objects or areas in the container.

7. The method according to claim 1, comprising that containers which are filled with CO2-containing products and in which contaminants have been determined during a first examination are at least one of marked, by means of an imprint or a label, or discharged from the production process, and containers which are filled with CO2-containing products and in which neither contaminants nor gas bubbles have been determined in the product/container nor gas mists have determined in the product/container are advanced to a next production step without being objected to.

8. The method according to claim 1, comprising that containers which are filled with CO2-containing products are discharged from the production process if at least one of contaminants, gas bubbles in the product/container or gas mists in the product/container are determined during a re-examination of the container.

9. The method according to claim 1, comprising that filled containers, which have been sorted so that they can be examined for contaminants once more, are parked, prior to said renewed examination for contaminants, for periods of at least 0.1 h.

10. An apparatus (A) for examining filled containers, which are filled with CO2-containing products for contaminants, comprising a measurement unit (M) which is capable of examining, a container to be examined for at least one of gas bubbles in the product/container gas mists in the product/container, or for contaminants in the product/container, in which, if gas bubbles are determined in at least one of the product or the container, or if gas mists are determined in the product/container, the container can be sorted out and one of fed back to the measurement unit (M) by a container guide for renewed examination by means of the measurement unit (M) later on, or fed to some other alternative measurement unit.

11. The apparatus according to claim 10, the apparatus (A) for examining filled containers including a container treatment unit (S) for a spin-stop process.

12. The apparatus according to claim 10, the apparatus (A) for examining filled containers including a container parking station that accommodates filled containers.

13. The apparatus according to claim 10, the measurement unit (M) including an infrared camera (K).