The present invention generally relates to an inspection system for a sheet-fed recto-verso printing press. The present invention more particularly relates to such an inspection system for a sheet-fed recto-verso offset printing press.
Sheet-fed recto-verso printing presses are known in the art, in particular for performing simultaneous recto-verso printing of sheets or webs.
Swiss patent CH 502 897 discloses a multi-color recto-verso printing press for performing simultaneous recto-verso offset printing. The press comprises two blanket cylinders contacting one another to form a printing nip where the paper is printed, each blanket cylinder carrying inked patterns to be applied on to the paper. The inked patterns are formed on the surface of the blanket cylinders by means of two groups of inking devices and plate cylinders. Sheets to be printed are fed to the printing location, between the two blanket cylinders, and are transferred, once printed, to a sheet delivery system, typically a so-called chain gripper systems comprising a plurality of spaced-apart gripper bars comprising a series of grippers for holding a leading edge of the sheets. Another example of a similar printing presses can be found in European patent application EP 0 949 069 A1.
For the purpose of ensuring a sufficient level of printing quality, it is often desired to carry out inspection of the freshly printed sheets on the printing press itself. One typically speaks in this case of in-line inspection, in contrast to off-line inspection where sheets are inspected separately from the printing press or presses where they were printed. In-line inspection system are for instance described in European patent applications EP 0 527 453 and EP 0 576 824. EP 0 576 824 in particular describes an in-line inspection system for carrying out inspection on a recto-verso printing press. In this example, inspection is carried out in the sheet transfer path between the printing station and a sheet-delivery station of the printing press.
Carrying out in-line inspection on recto-verso printing presses is rather complicated because both sides of the printed sheets are printed with fresh ink. Indeed, for inspection to be carried out, one must ensure that, during inspection, the printed sheet to be inspected or at least part of it is appropriately positioned with respect to a reference location. With single-sided printing press, the side of the sheet which has not been printed with fresh ink can be drawn against a reference surface, typically by means of suctions means, inspection of the other side of the sheet being carried out while the sheet is held against the reference surface. Such solution is described in the above-mentioned European patent application EP 0 527 453. With double-sided printing presses, such a solution can only be envisaged if the side of the sheet that is drawn against the reference surface has previously been dried. Otherwise, the contact of the freshly printed side of the sheet with the reference surface would cause smearing and therefore irremediably degrade the printing quality of that side of the sheet.
The solutions proposed so far for carrying out in-line inspection on recto-verso printing presses typically consist in locating the inspection system in the sheet-delivery path of the printing press, as proposed in European patent application EP 0 576 824. Further examples of such a principle can be found in European patent applications EP 1 142 712, EP 1 167 034 and EP 1 323 529. A problem with such solutions however resides in the increased complexity of the printing press. This is particularly the case of the solutions described in EP 1 142 712, EP 1 167 034 and EP 1 323 529 which require two separate sheet transport systems, namely a first one to transfer the sheets from the printing station to the sheet inspection system and a second one to transfer the sheets from the inspection system to the sheet-delivery station.
Still another problem of the prior art solutions, resides in the increased length of the sheet delivery path caused by the presence of the sheet inspection system itself, which thereby increases the footprint of the printing press as a whole.
There is therefore a need for a less complicated and more compact solution.
An aim of the invention is thus to improve the known sheet inspection system for recto-verso printing presses.
More particularly, an aim of the present invention is to provide a solution which does not substantially increase the complexity of the printing press and which can moreover be implemented in existing printing presses without major modifications.
Another aim of the present invention is to provide a solution which does not necessitate an increase of the length of the sheet transport path between the printing station and the sheet-delivery station.
Still another aim of the present invention is to provide a solution which can efficiently prevent smearing of the sheets during inspection.
These aims are achieved thanks to the inspection system and printing press defined in the claims.
According to the invention, a more compact solution is provided which does not require any increase of the footprint of the printing press as compared to a press without inspection. In addition, inspection is carried out at a location immediately following the printing operation. Smearing problems are thus reduced to a minimum.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are the subject-matter of the dependent claims.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will appear more clearly from reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention which are presented solely by way of non-restrictive examples and illustrated by the attached drawings in which:
The invention will be described hereinafter in the context of a sheet-fed offset printing press for printing security papers, in particular banknotes. As this will be apparent from the following, the various embodiments illustrated in the drawings are based on a common machine configuration with the same printing group adapted for simultaneous recto-verso offset printing of the sheets. This printing group is as such similar to that described in European patent application EP 0 949 069 which is incorporated herein by reference. It will however be understood that the printing group could be adapted for performing printing according to other printing processes.
Sheets are fed from a feeding station 1 located at the right-hand side of the printing group onto a feeding table 2 and then to a succession of transfer cylinders 3 (three cylinders in this example) placed upstream of the blanket cylinders 10, 20. While being transported by the transfer cylinders 3, the sheets may optionally receive a first impression on one side of the sheets using an additional printing group (not illustrated) as described in EP 0 949 069, one of the transfer cylinders 3 (namely the two-segment cylinder in
The chain gripper system 5 typically comprises a pair of chains holding a plurality of spaced-apart gripper bars (not shown) each provided with a series of grippers for holding a leading edge of the sheets. In the example of
At the two extremities of the chain gripper system 5, namely below the blanket cylinders 10, 20 and at the outermost left-hand-side part of the sheet delivery station 6, there are provided pairs of chain wheels 51 and 52.
In the example of
Turning now to the inspection system, the printing press shown in
More precisely, the inspection device 100 is disposed in such a way that the first line image sensor 110 visually acquires an image of a printed sheet while the printed sheet is still adhering onto the surface of the first blanket cylinder 10 of the printing press and immediately before the printed sheet is transferred to the down-stream located transfer cylinder 60. In the embodiment of
Carrying out inspection at this location has shown to be advantageous as the freshly printed sheet is still adhering to the surface of the blanket cylinder 10. One thus exploits the inherent function of the blanket cylinder as a reference surface for carrying out inspection. In addition, the fresh ink has a sticking effect which prevent the sheets from detaching too easily from the surface of the blanket cylinder 10. No smearing problems can accordingly occur as the sheet is still in contact with the printing form. In addition, the distance between the printing nip and the sheet transfer location being less than the length of the sheet, inspection is carried out at a time where the sheet is still held between the blanket cylinders 10, 20 at the printing nip thereof and/or held by its leading edge by the transfer cylinder 60.
As shown in
The other inspection device 200 similarly comprises a line image sensor 210 for performing line-scanning image acquisition of the other side of the printed sheets while these are transported by the first transfer cylinder 60. No mirror is required in this example, as the first transfer cylinder 60 enables presenting the other side of the printed sheets directly in front of the line image sensor 210. A light source 230 is also disposed in order to appropriately illuminate the inspected zone on the sheet carried by the transfer cylinder 60.
The transfer cylinders 60 and 65 are preferably one-segment cylinders for carrying one sheet at a time and are preferably treated with or comprise an ink-repellent coating for preventing smearing of the printed sheets. Smearing problems are not as such critical as the printed sheets are directly transferred from the blanket cylinder 10 to the transfer cylinder 60, and from the transfer cylinder 60 to the other transfer cylinder 65. Smearing problems are exacerbated when the printed sheets are transferred from one type of transporting device to another type of transporting device, such as for instance from a chain gripper system to a cylinder as proposed in EP 1 142 712, EP 1 167 034 and EP 1 323 529, because of the inherent speed differences and speed inaccuracies between the two systems. Advantageously, the first and second transfer cylinder 60, 65 are designed as suction drums.
In the example of
The embodiment illustrated in
In this other embodiment, the arrangement and configuration of the first inspection device 300 is identical to that of inspection device 200 in
It will be understood that various modifications and/or improvements obvious to the person skilled in the art can be made to the embodiments described hereinabove without departing from the scope of the invention defined by the annexed claims. For instance, while the embodiments show that the freshly printed sheets are carried by the first blanket cylinder 10, other solutions within the scope of the invention might provide for the transport of the printed sheets by means of the second blanket cylinder 20. Within the scope of the claims, it shall therefore be understood that the expression “first printing cylinder” and “second printing cylinder” can designate any of the two printing cylinders. In addition, while the invention has been described in connection with a printing press for performing simultaneous recto-verso offset printing, the machine might perform simultaneous printing according to other printing processes.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06005169 | Mar 2006 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2007/000562 | 3/8/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/29/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/105059 | 9/20/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4836104 | Duarte | Jun 1989 | A |
5329852 | Bolza-Schuenemann et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5471309 | Bolza-Schunemann | Nov 1995 | A |
5724437 | Bucher et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6101939 | Giori et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6269743 | DeMoore et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6822590 | Kusaka | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883429 | Kamoda | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7000540 | Conzelmann et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7096784 | Giori et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7131376 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20010054364 | Kusaka | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040026851 | Schaede et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040173113 | Dunninger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040255802 | Conzelmann et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050249380 | Geissler et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060213384 | Reinhard et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
502 897 | Feb 1971 | CH |
0 527 453 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 576 824 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 949 069 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 088 654 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 142 712 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 167 034 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 323 529 | Jul 2003 | EP |
17138 | May 1973 | GB |
2005115759 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090025594 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |