1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to deep pile foundations, and in particular to a method of interactively determining a pile depth, i.e. “toe level” necessary to meet a design load capacity criterium.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the field of foundation construction, pile-type foundation systems are commonly used to support a wide variety of structures. Typical structural applications include commercial buildings, institutional buildings, industrial facilities, power plants, transportation and other structures involving relatively heavy static loads. Moreover, dynamic loads associated with operating equipment can be accommodated by pile-type foundation systems.
The piles comprising such foundation systems can be formed with poured-in-place concrete, which is generally poured into prediilled boreholes around steel reinforcing bar cages, which have been preset in the boreholes. Auger Cast-in Place (“ACIP”) represents another type of pile forming technique wherein grout or concrete is introduced under pressure or by gravity through the auger bit into the borehole, for example, during the extraction of the auger bit. Grout generally comprises cement, fine aggregate (e.g., sand) and appropriate admixtures. ACIP foundations generally offer advantages of relatively high bearing capacities and relatively fast, cost-effective construction. Moreover, significant material savings can often be achieved, as compared to comparable poured-in-place pile foundation systems.
Drilled displacement (DD) methods can offer further advantages, particularly with respect to the elimination of excessive spoilage extracted from the boreholes, which presents a disposal problem. Spoilage disposal can be particularly expensive and problematical when hazardous wastes are encountered in the subsurface soil being drilled, for example in environmental remediation projects and on project sites containing buried hazardous wastes. A DD pile forming apparatus is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,033,152. The auger bit shown therein includes a lower section with constant-diameter, right-hand flighting on a downwardly-tapered core and an upper section with reverse (left-hand) flighting on an upwardly-tapered core. The tapered configuration of the lower section tends to displace and compact the soil laterally. The reverse flighting of the upper section pushes the spoilage brought up by the lower section back downwardly and outwardly for compaction.
Several benefits can be achieved with such displacement. The lateral displacement tends to “improve” the soil. Specifically, the borehole is thus lined with compacted soil, which tends to contain the grout and prevent its dispersal into loose, uncompacted surrounding soil. Another benefit relates to minimizing the quantity of spoilage exiting the borehole at grade. As compared to conventional, full-flight augers, displacement-type auger bits tend to displace soil capable of displacement. Displacement also avoids the extraction of soft, sloppy, water-laden soil. Another disadvantage associated with conventional, full-flight augers relates to over-excavation whereby excessive quantities of softer soil are extracted from certain portions of boreholes. The resulting over-excavated boreholes often have hourglass-shaped configurations with enlarged portions, which tend to require excessive quantities of grout or concrete as compared to cylindrical, straight-walled boreholes. Such extra material can be relatively expensive, particularly when multiple and relatively deep boreholes are affected.
Lateral soil displacement can be accomplished with auger bits having tapered stems, which tend to force the displaced soil laterally outwardly. For example, the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,033.152 discloses a “full” displacement auger bit with a tapered stem and bidirectional flighting. The stem expands upwardly from a minimum diameter at its lower end to a maximum diameter at a transition section where the flighting reverses and contracts back to a reduced diameter at an upper end of the auger bit. The flighting has a relatively constant diameter, which is approximately equal to the maximum diameter of the stem at the transition section whereby substantially “full” displacement occurs at the transition section. The fully-expanded stem and the bidirectional flighting of this auger bit cooperate to force substantially all of the displaced soil to the transition section of the bit, which “displaces” and compacts it laterally into the borehole periphery. The borehole periphery is thereby “improved,” with greater grout-retaining capacity.
Pile forming operations can extend to considerable depths as required by project structural design criteria and depending upon the load-bearing capacity of the soil conditions encountered at different depths. For example, DD piles can extend 50 feet or more into the earth. Pile diameters of two feet or more are relatively common. The various combinations of soil, rock and buried concrete (e.g., from previous projects) encountered in such borings tend to affect the materials and configurations of different cutting tips mounted on the augers. For example, soils with high rock content require bits with special cutting teeth and hardened (e.g., heat-treated) steel construction. Soils comprising primarily clay and/or sand, on the other hand, can be drilled with bits having other tip constructions and configurations.
Wear-resistance is a relatively important aspect of DD bit design. Costs associated with bit wear and replacement tend to be relatively high. Therefore, minimizing wear and the attendant costs of same are important objectives.
Auger, cast-in-place (ACI P) foundation piles are similar but lack the lateral displacement feature of the DD piles described above. The augers used for ACI P foundations typically have a continuous flight auger (CFA) configuration with constant stem diameters and one-directional flighting. They are commonly used where the site stratigraphy from test borings indicates soil conditions that would not be conducive to lateral displacement, and/or where extracted spoilage is acceptable.
Conventional pile foundation construction involves first installing one or more test piles, typically at the “worst-case” part of the jobsite. The test borehole is generally drilled partly into a bearing layer of soil. Several other soil layers with lesser capacities (i.e. soil strength, cohesion, etc.) may be located above a “target” layer, which often comprises a well-defined dense material stratum. The equipment operator can terminate the test borehole upon penetrating a predetermined depth into the target layer, thereby establishing a “toe level.” Upon reaching the target layer, the torque increases as a consequence of boring into the denser material. The increased torque can be detected by the equipment operator and used to establish the borehole toe level. Because the other pilings are located in better soil conditions, it is normally reasonable to use the toe level from the test boring for the entire project. However, the specific site stratigraphy may be more complex and may include a transitional increase in strength with depth. If design capacities can be achieved with the production piles at lesser depths than the test pile, significant cost savings can be achieved without compromising the structural integrity of the foundation. The installation effort (IE) value relates a torque index (TI) and a penetration rate index (PRI) to a pile geotechnical capacity (Q). Monitoring the cumulative installation effort (CIE) can reliably determine the required toe level for a required capacity, for example, with the DD equipment and procedures described herein, and with other equipment and procedures, such as ACIP. Complex stratigraphy and varying subsurface site conditions can be accommodated with the IE methodology of the present invention.
The present invention addresses these design criteria. Heretofore there has not been available a full-displacement DD/IE system and method with the advantages and features of the present invention.
In the practice of an aspect of the present invention, a full displacement system is provided for forming a drilled displacement (DD) foundation pile. The system includes a rig adapted for hoisting and rotating an auger for drilling a subsurface borehole. The auger includes an auger bit with bidirectional flighting and a tapered stem, which cooperate to laterally displace and compact soil on the borehole periphery. The auger bit includes anti-wear protrusions, comprising stepped edges of the stem plates and blocks extending transversely across the flighting upper faces. The protrusions trap soil in protective positions on the stem and flighting for protecting same from wear. Another anti-wear feature comprises a double layer of flighting at the auger bit lower end. In the practice of the method of the present invention, the auger is hoisted and rotated by the rig, which is also adapted for exerting a downward “crowding” force for boring. Upon reaching a desired depth, as determined by soil bearing conditions, the auger is extracted simultaneously with pumping grouting material into the borehole. The rig can optionally be utilized for placing a reinforcing cage in the grout material for curing in-place to provide a reinforced pile. In the practice of another aspect of the method of the present invention, installation effort (IE) is calculated based on a torque index (TI) and a tool penetration rate index (PRI) and used for computing a total level necessary to achieve a required minimum geotechnical capacity (Qmin).
a and 13b are a flowchart for a method of constructing a deep foundation pile and embodying an aspect of the present invention.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience in reference only and will not be limiting. For example, up, down, front, back, right and left refer to the invention as oriented in the view being referred to. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the embodiment being described and designated parts thereof. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar meaning.
Referring to the drawings in more detail, the reference numeral 2 generally designates a pile-forming system embodying the present invention and including a rig 4 with a tracked transport vehicle and power source 6 mounting a mast 8 with a generally vertical, drilling position (
In performing a boring operation, the vehicle 6 traverses a job site ground surface 11 to locate the auger 19 over the desired location of a borehole 13. The rig 4 can include manual or automatic fine adjustment controls for relatively precisely positioning the auger 19 and plumbing the mast 8. The auger 19 includes an auger bit 20, which is mounted on the lower end of the grout pipe 18 by a splined coupling 21 and is adapted for boring the borehole 13 when rotated by the rotary drive 10. The auger 19 is urged downwardly (i.e. “crowded”) by a crowd winch 16 operating through the cable network 15. Grout is pumped from the grout pump 12 through a swivel connection in the rotary drive 10, through the grout pipe 18 and into the auger bit 20 for discharge from the lower end thereof during extraction of the auger bit 20 whereby the borehole 13 is filled with cementous grout below the extracting auger bit 20.
The system 2 and the method described thus far are generally similar to known prior art systems. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,033,152 for Pile Forming Apparatus shows such a system and is incorporated herein by reference.
The auger bit 20 includes a stem 22 with lower and upper sections 24, 26 terminating at stem lower and upper ends 28, 30 respectively. The stem lower section 24 is tapered with a downwardly-converging configuration and the stem upper section 26 is oppositely tapered with an upwardly-converging configuration. The maximum diameter of the stem 22 occurs at a transition 32 whereat the stem diameter is approximately equal to the overall diameter of the auger bit 20. The bit 20 is thus a “full” displacement type. “Partial” displacement augers, on the other hand, have stem diameters that are less than their overall flighting diameters.
As shown in
The auger bit 20 also includes flighting 56 including a lower, right-hand flighting section 58 and an upper, left-hand flighting section 60 associated with the stem lower and upper sections 24, 26 respectively. The flighting sections 58, 60 converge at the transition 32 to form a V-shaped flighting point 62. At the transition 32 the stem 22 diameter substantially equals the flighting 56 diameter whereby substantially all of the displaced soil material is displaced laterally and compacted into the sides of the borehole 13, i.e. “full” displacement. Conversely, the maximum exposure of the flighting 56 occurs in proximity to the stem lower and upper ends 28, 30.
The flighting 56 is equipped with anti-wear protrusions comprising blocks 66 mounted on the upper face of the lower flighting section 58 and generally extending radially outwardly from the stem outer shell 40 to a flighting edge 64. A suitable number of blocks 66 are located at appropriate intervals along the lower flighting section 58 and form protective packed-soil flighting shields 68, which reduce abrasive contact between displaced spoilage 54 and the upper surfaces of the flighting lower section 58, as shown in
The auger bit 20 can include a removable and replaceable tip 70 adjacent to and including the stem lower end 28. The tip 70 terminates at a cutting tool 72, which can be configured for the particular soil conditions encountered at a job site. Exemplary cutting tool configurations which are known in the prior art are shown in
In the practice of the method of the present invention, the transport vehicle 6 is transported to a job site and the mast 8 is raised. The rotary drive 10 can be fully raised to commence a drilling procedure. Kelly bar extensions (not shown) are known in the prior art and provide additional boring depth capability by extending the auger 19 above the top of the mast 8. The rig 4 can be manually and/or automatically adjusted for relatively precise positioning of the borehole and for plumbing the mast 8. The rotary drive 10 rotates the auger 19 clockwise for the bit flighting configuration shown, i.e. right-hand through the flighting lower section 58. The weight of the auger 19 can be augmented by the weight of the rig 4 exerted through the crowd winch 16, which the operator can control in order to maintain a relatively constant downward pressure on the auger 19. The cutting tool 72, 74 or 76 breaks through the subsurface soil, rock, etc. and the right-hand lower section flighting 58 advances the auger 19, while conveying spoilage upwardly in a helical path defined by the lower section flighting 58. The upwardly-expanding diameter of the stem lower section 24, which is associated with its tapered configuration, tends to force the displaced spoilage outwardly, compacting same with the borehole 13 periphery.
The left-hand upper flighting section 60 pushes displaced material downwardly for lateral displacement and compaction adjacent to the full-displacement, auger bit transition 32. Such displacement and compaction provides several benefits. Little or no spoilage is extracted onto the ground surface 11, thus eliminating or reducing expenses and problems associated with spoilage disposal. Moreover, the periphery of the borehole 13 is compacted and stabilized, thus facilitating the pile formation by effectively retaining the wet grout. Without such stabilization, considerable volumes of grout could flow laterally into the adjacent soil, particularly in loose and sandy soil conditions and in over-excavated boreholes.
After reaching the desired depth, the auger 19 is extracted using the cable network 15. Rotation in the same direction is maintained through the downward insertion stroke and through the upward extraction stroke, whereby soil displacement can occur throughout both strokes. Simultaneously with extracting the auger 19, cementous material, such as grout 36, is discharged through the discharge opening 38. The weight of the column of grout 36 in the auger 19 tends to force the grout 36 into the borehole 13 under considerable pressure, which tends to minimize voids and air pockets.
After the borehole 13 is substantially filled with grout 36, the cable network 15 can be used to hoist a suitable reinforcing cage 78 on the mast 8. The reinforcing cage 78 can then be lowered into the wet grout 36. Suitable guides (not shown) can be provided for properly spacing the reinforcing cage 78 inwardly from the borehole 13 periphery whereby the reinforcing cage 78 is substantially centered therein. The reinforcing cage 78 can be suspended in the wet grout 36 by a suitable suspension device attached to the upper end of the reinforcing cage 78.
In the practice another aspect of the method of the present invention, IE is monitored and used interactively in the drilling of boreholes for auger pressure grouted displacement (APGD) and auger cast-in-place (ACIP) pile foundations. Without limitation on the generality of useful applications of the IE method of the present invention, it can be used in connection with the APGD system and method described above. Generally speaking, the IE method involves computing torque based on hydraulic fluid pressure (Tfp) and penetration rate (PR) indices for specific drilling rigs and correlating IE comprising the product of T and PR with ultimate load capacity (Qult).
Referring to
TI=2.78(tfp/TBase)1.36
Similarly, a penetration rate index (PRI) is calculated at 108 as the inverse of the square root of the penetration rate (PR) normalized by a base penetration rate (PRBase), chosen as 6.1 meters (20 feet) per minute:
PRI=1/(PR/PRBase)0.5
The product of PRI and TI gives the incremental (or instantaneous) installation effort (IIE) at 110.
IIE=PRI×TI
The relationships for PRI and TI arise from the fact that neither penetration rate nor torque is linearly related to soil strength. IIE is a good indicator of subsurface stratigraphy over a range of conditions, and consequently the total or cumulative installation effort (CIE) required to extend the tool to the toe level can be directly related to the ultimate pile capacity (Qult). The total effort generally indicates shaft resistance, and the effort just prior to reaching the toe level relates to toe resistance. A relatively consistent relationship exists between cumulative installation effort (CIE) and ultimate pile capacity (Qult):
Q
ult=1040.1 Ln(SumIE)−6396.8 kN
Performance charts for specific rigs are calculated at 112 using the formulae noted above. Although such performance charts can be estimated based on experience with similar types of equipment, rigs tend to vary somewhat in their actual performances whereby data from specific pile constructions is useful for formulating the rig-specific charts. For a particular project, site-specific data can be obtained from test borings at 114 and a required test pile depth (Dmin) is estimated at 116.
A pile is drilled at 118, IIE is evaluated at 120 and accumulated at 122 to provide cumulative IE (CIE) for use in refining the test pile depth at 124. If the depth is not reached (negative at decision box 126), the cycle loops back to continue drilling the pile at 118. An affirmative decision at 126 leads to a load test at 128 and estimating the required production pile depth at 130. Production piles are drilled at 132. IIE is evaluated at 134 and IE is cumulated at 136 to derive CIE and the production pile depth is evaluated and refined as necessary at 138. If the depth is not reached (negative decision at decision box 140), the cycle loops back to drilling production piles at 132. An affirmative decision at 140 leads to a Done? decision box 142, from which a negative decision also loops back to drilling additional production piles at 132, with an affirmative decision leading to updating the rate-specific performance chart at 144 and an end at 146.
a-13b show a method of constructing an APGD foundation consisting of multiple piles according to an aspect of the method of the present invention. From a start 202, site-specific data (stratigraphy) is obtained from test borings at 204 and project-specific performance parameters are determined at 206. An estimated minimum pile toe level/depth (Dmin) is determined at 208 and appropriate rigs and their respective performance charts are selected and obtained at 210, 212. Test piles are drilled at 214 and IIE is continuously evaluated at 216 to obtain CIE at 218, from which Qult is calculated at 220 according to the above formula. Utilizing this information, the test Dmin is refined at 222. If Dmin is not reached (negative decision at decision box 224), the cycle loops back to drilling at 214. An affirmative decision at 224 leads to a compression load test at decision box 226, which, if not passed (negative decision) leads to drilling another test pile at 214, with an affirmative decision leading to stratigraphy modeling and data compilation at 228, based upon which pile group factors are considered at 230. Piles in groups can perform differently than standalone piles and can have different load capacities depending on a variety of factors, such as stratigraphy, pile spacing, loads, etc.
Continuing with
It is to be understood that the invention can be embodied in various forms, and is not to be limited to the examples discussed above. Other components, configurations and steps can be utilized in the practice of the present invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/696,054 filed Apr. 3, 2007, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/890,061, filed Jul. 13, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,198,434, issued Apr. 3, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10890061 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11696054 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11696054 | Apr 2007 | US |
Child | 12025640 | US |