The present invention relates generally to documents, such as lottery tickets, having indicia under a Scratch-Off-Coating (SOC), and more particularly to methods for enhancing the redundancy of the documents while adding to the aesthetics of the documents.
Lottery scratch-off or instant games have become a time-honored method of raising revenue for state and federal governments the world over. Indeed, the concept of hiding indicia information under a SOC has also been applied to numerous other products such as commercial contests, telephone card account numbers, gift cards, etc. Literally, billions of scratch-off products are printed every year where the Scratch-Off-Coatings (SOCs) are used to ensure that the product has not been previously used, played, or modified.
Typically the indicia are printed using a specialized high-speed ink jet printer or imager with a water-soluble dye. Normally, the indicia are monochromatic black or in some cases red in color, but in all cases each type of indicia is imaged as a discrete spot color.
This use of single spot color indicia imaging has repeatedly proven to be problematic with traditional spot color inkjet heads partially clogging, such that a portion of the indicia prints while other portions do not. For example, in January 2015, a Roswell, N. Mex. lottery player believed he won over $500,000 in an instant ticket key number match game. The lottery player believed that he was holding a winning ticket 100 (
Some attempts to mitigate the problem of clogged lottery inkjet misprints have been attempted with the incorporation of detailed legal disclaimers, abbreviated captions of indicia, and the development of elaborate automated press monitoring systems—e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,665,400 (Duke). However, legal disclaimers do nothing to mitigate bad press resulting from misprinted lottery tickets and so far have not stopped lawsuits. Additionally, most players do not notice any indicia captions due to small size and abbreviated spelling—see
To date, some state jurisdictions have attempted to pass legislation forcing lotteries or their ticket providers to pay out apparent prizes on misprinted tickets with comments like: “That's a real problem because people are throwing away tickets all the time that could very well be winning tickets if these misprints are out there . . . ” It is therefore highly desirable to develop techniques and methodologies for ensuring the redundancy and integrity of scratch-off ticket indicia. Ideally, these redundancy mechanisms would also provide added security against pin-prick attacks of instant tickets where a nefarious person attempts to identify winning indicia via a series of small holes on the SOC such that the attacked ticket still appears to be intact and unplayed to the untrained eye. Particularly, these redundancy and security techniques should enhance the aesthetics of the ticket or document rather than detracting from its appearance. The present invention essentially eliminates or solves problems of misprints or tampered tickets or other documents.
One aspect of the present invention relates to a redundantly printed security-enhanced document comprising a substrate and at least two different printed variable indicia directly or indirectly on the substrate having a general area, the at least two different printed variable indicia having at least first printed variable indicia printed in the same general area of the substrate as at least second printed variable indicia, the at least first printed variable indicia and the at least second printed variable indicia being present so as to overlap with or be registered so closely together such that failure of the printing of one or more portions of either or any of the at least two printed variable indicia does not alter a meaning of information represented by variable indicia on the redundantly printed security-enhanced document.
The at least first printed variable indicia and the at least second printed variable indicia are printed in different colors, such as or preferably in two or four different colors. The colors can be process colors.
One of the at least first printed variable indicia and the at least second printed variable indicia at least partially can comprise numerals and wherein another of the at least first printed variable indicia and the at least second printed variable indicia at least partially can comprise words.
One of the at least first printed variable indicia and the at least second printed variable indicia at least can comprise drawings or photographs.
Another aspect of the present invention is a method of making a redundantly printed security-enhanced document comprising a substrate having a general area and at least two different printed variable indicia directly or indirectly on the substrate, the method comprising printing directly or indirectly on the substrate at least first printed variable indicia and at least second printed variable indicia in the same general area of the substrate, and during the printing, registering and maintaining registration of the at least first printed variable indicia and the at least second printed variable indicia so as to overlap with or be registered so closely together such that failure of the printing of one or more portions of either or any of the at least two printed variable indicia does not alter a meaning of information represented by variable indicia on the redundantly printed security-enhanced document. The method can print the variable indicia to produce the redundantly printed enhanced-security document having the features set forth above.
Objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be apparent from the present description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In accordance with aspects of the invention, a security-enhanced document with a removable SOC is produced, which may be an instant lottery ticket in certain embodiments. The document includes any variable imaged indicium that determines if the document wins any prize(s) or contains data that is otherwise secure under the SOC. Thus, as used herein, “ticket” or “instant lottery ticket” includes both lottery tickets and other types of security enhanced documents using scratch-off coatings.
In a first embodiment, the variable indicia are imaged using all or some of the standard CMYK (i.e., Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and blacK) process colors. In this embodiment, redundancy is achieved via multiple ink applications due to the serial application of the individual CMYK process colors.
In another embodiment, the variable indicia itself is imaged in one color with at least one secondary color providing a written description of the indicia in the background. Like the first embodiment, this embodiment achieves redundancy via multiple ink applications. In this particular embodiment, the indicia and background colors do not necessarily have to be CMYK.
In still another embodiment, the variable indicia are imaged utilizing patterns of multiple colors. Again, redundancy is achieved via multiple ink applications.
In yet another embodiment, the variable indicia are imaged with an inverted background color with redundancy achieved via the inverted foreground and background different colors. As used herein, “inverted” colored indicia in the foreground or background of a printed substrate uses a light-colored background with dark-colored foreground or vice versa, or uses different contrasting colors, or uses complementary colors or otherwise different colors for the background and foreground, such that the color indicia in both the foreground and background are visible and legible. This embodiment also has the advantage of creating confusion coloration as a countermeasure to pin pricking attacks.
In all of these embodiments, the variable indicia and their background are composed of at least two separate colors. The essential concept of the invention is to provide imaging redundancy since different colors require different ink applications with the different ink applications providing redundancy due to different ink hardware, ink, etc. for each color.
Described are a number of printing mechanisms and methodologies that provide practical details for reliably producing redundant indicia under a SOC that are immune to failure of any one high speed variable ink application system. Although the examples provided herein are primarily related to instant tickets, it is clear that the same methods are applicable to any type of document (e.g., telephone card, prepaid cards, vouchers, bank security instruments, coupons, etc.) where information is protected by a SOC.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawings will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
As used herein, the words “image” or “print” are used equivalently and mean that whatever indicium or indicia is or are created directly or indirectly on any substrate may be done by any known imaging or printing method or equipment. Likewise, “imaging” or “printing” describing a method and “imaged” or “printed” describing the resulting indicium or indicia are used equivalently and correspondingly to “image” or “print.”
As used herein, the terms “multi” or “multiple” or similar terms means at least two, and may also mean three, four, or more, for example, unless otherwise indicated in the context of the use of the terms.
As used herein, “variable” indicium or indicia refers to imaged indicia which indicates information relating a property, such as, without limit, a value of the document, such as, without limit, a lottery ticket, coupon, commercial game piece or the like, where the variable indicium or indicia is or are ultimately hidden by a SOC until the information or value is authorized to be seen, such as by a purchaser of the document who scratches off the SOC, revealing the variable indicium or indicia.
Reference will now be made in detail to examples of the invention, one or more embodiments of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, and not meant as a limitation of the invention. For example, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment, may be used with another embodiment to yield still a further embodiment. The present invention encompasses these and other modifications and variations as come within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Multi-color indicia redundancy can be achieved with fewer colors, so long as at least two colors are applied to each indicium. The at least two redundant colors can be various spot colors and need not comprise the standard CMYK process colors.
Notice that in the embodiments 150, 160, and 165, because of the redundant meaning of the variable indicia, failure of any one color to print in either the primary (numerical) variable indicia or the secondary background (caption) variable indicia would not obfuscate the intended meaning of the indicia in a game. When it is realized that the secondary background (caption) variable indicia 152, 162, 167 is imaged over or under the respective primary variable indicia 151, 161, 167, as is shown in example 165, it becomes apparent that redundancy is maintained even if either the primary or secondary variable indicia fail to print at all. Another advantage of the examples of
The relatively low resolution (240 dpi) of and monochromatic nature of existing variable indicia on standard lottery tickets dictates that the fonts for these characters be simple and straightforward so that even consumers with poor eyesight can readily differentiate between different information imparted by the variable indicia. This simplistic representation of information reduces the amount of entropy in the image and therefore makes it possible to more easily identify particular variable indicia with very little visual information, such that microscopic pinprick patterns (where the SOC would appear to be substantially intact to the unaided eye) can enable pick-out of illicit winners, since the pinprick patterns would be more discernible. In the preferred embodiment of
One possible press configuration 250 capable of producing the redundant variable indicia embodiments of
A different press configuration 275 is illustrated in
Of course, all press configuration embodiments must ensure that sufficient registration is maintained between multiple ink or dye applications such that the redundantly printed variable indicia appear to be one coherent object to the human eye. Thus, it is essential that registration be maintained between the various applications of redundant indicia, preferably to between 1 and ½ print dot.
Of course, there are other variations of the disclosed embodiments (e.g., process color indicia images comprised of a balance of at least two different colors, etc.) that would be apparent to anyone skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure, and would be within the parameters of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/243,384, filed Oct. 19, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4677553 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4725079 | Koza et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
5268992 | Sasaki | Dec 1993 | A |
5542710 | Silverschotz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5601887 | Rich et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5681065 | Rua, Jr. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704647 | Desbiens | Jan 1998 | A |
5752152 | Gasper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5803504 | Deshiens et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6097497 | McGraw | Aug 2000 | A |
6155491 | Dueker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6325420 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330685 | Hao et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354630 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379742 | Behm et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405929 | Behm et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6493597 | Linares et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6650946 | Bauer | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6694043 | Seder et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6733194 | Schilling et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6739245 | Schilling et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6768558 | Yamashita et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7665400 | Duke | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8342576 | Eschbach et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8539883 | Reckefuss et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8619278 | Kojima et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20030193684 | Kendall et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040061326 | Hilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060017758 | Nambudiri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080013848 | Wu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100139512 | Reckefuss et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100253063 | Skogster | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110126729 | Morono et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110134458 | Kojima et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120025516 | Miller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120145024 | Scrymgeour | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120267888 | Behm | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20170106271 | Finnerty et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 20, 2017 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2016/057677. |
Anika Myers Palm, “Woman sues after ‘winning’ $500,000 scratch-off ticket is called misprint,” Orlando Sentinel, May 20, 2010, downloaded from webpage: <http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2010-05-20/news/os-scratch-off-lottery-lawsuit-mispri20100520_1_gold-rush-ticket-lottery-officials-lottery-spokeswoman-jacqueline-barreiros>. |
Associated Press, “Florida Lottery refuses to pay winning prize,” May 1, 2007, downloaded from webpage: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/18728793/ns/us_news-weird_news/t/florida-lottery-refuses-pay-winning-prize/#.WDHYNHeZOEI<http://www.nbcnews.com/id/18n8793/ns/us_news-weird_news/t/florida-lottery-refuses-pay-winning-prize/>. |
Barbara Hijek, “‘Winning’ $500,000 scratch-off ticket is called misprint,” Sun Sentinel, May 21, 2010, downloaded from webpage: <http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sfl-mtblog-2010-05-winning_500000_scratchoff_tick-story.html>. |
Dallas Franklin, “New Mexico man told $500,000 winning lottery ticket is a ‘misprint’,” NBC News, KFOR.com, Jan. 5, 2015, downloaded from webpage: <http://kfor.com/2015/01/05/new-mexico-man-told-500000-winning-lottery-ticket-is-a-misprint/>. |
Dan Russell, “Misprinted Lottery Tickets and the Disappointment of a Non-Winning Ticket,” American Gaming Layer, Autumn 2015, downloaded from webpage: <https://imgl.org/sites/default/files/media/publications/misprintedlotterytickets_russel_agl_fall_2015.pdf>. |
Gabrielle Burkhart, “Man suing NM Lottery over $500K ticket ‘misprint’,” KRQE.com, Feb. 4, 2015, <http://krqe.com/2015/02/04/man-suing-nm-lottery-over-500k-ticket-misprint/>. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2017 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2016/057677. |
Jameson Fleming, “New Mexico Man Told his $500K Winning Lottery Ticket was a ‘misprint’,” Syracuse.com, Jan. 6, 2015, downloaded from webpage: <http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2015/01/new_mexico_man_told_his_500k_winning_lottery_ticket_was_a_misprint.html>. |
Kipphan, “Handbook of Print Media”, Springer Verlag, pp. 94 (2000), including Google machine translation of original German text, 4 pages. |
Sophie Jane Evans, “Lottery refuses to pay out for retiree's $500k ‘winning’ lottery ticket because they say it's a Misprint,” Dailymail.com.uk, Jan. 5, 2015, downloaded from webpage: <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2898283/New-Mexico-man-buys-500k-winning-lottery-ticket-officials-say-misprint-refuse-honor-it.html>. |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 6, 2017 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2016/057677. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 18, 2018 in International Application No. PCT/US2018/038280. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170106271 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62243384 | Oct 2015 | US |