This application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/NL2009/050299, filed May 29, 2009, and which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 08157291.9, filed May 30, 2008, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to an instrument comprising:
An instrument as is set forth in the opening paragraph is in particular suitable for minimally invasive surgery, in course of which, usually, an elongated mechanism having substantially small cross-section is introduced via an incision into a body of a patient. The mechanism may comprise a handle or any other suitable actuator or mechanism for operating the first and the second working elements, for example, miniature forceps, miniature scissors, or the like. It is of paramount importance to first, apply sufficient force to the first and the second working element on one hand, and to provide accurate feedback of the applied force to the operator.
An embodiment of an instrument for minimally invasive surgery is known from WO 03/020139. In the known instrument the external force exerted on the forceps by a surgeon is being measured by a force sensor arranged on a jaw of the forceps and is feed-back to the surgeon via a control unit. In this way the surgeon can have a feeling of the applied force. The force sensor may be connected by means of a glass fiber to a suitable control unit.
It is a disadvantage of the known instrument in that an accuracy of the force measurement is affected by external factors, like ambient temperature and signal loss caused by undesirable deflection of the fiber due to the fact that it runs over a hinge of the working element. It is a further disadvantage of the known instrument that the gripping force measurement by the force sensor on the forceps is dependent on the axial position of the tissue in the forceps.
Another embodiment of a surgical instrument is known from U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,667. It is a disadvantage of the known surgical instrument that force sensor signals are routed along hinges, which decreases accuracy of the measurement.
A still another embodiment of a surgical instrument is known from WO2007/111737. It is a disadvantage of the known surgical instrument that, by way of its construction and sensor arrangement, it cannot measure gripping force independently of a position of tissue in the jaws.
It is an object of the invention to provide an instrument, in particular for minimally invasive surgery, wherein the force exerted on the first and/or second working element is determined with higher degree of accuracy.
To this end in the instrument according to the invention the distal end of the frame comprises an opening between the first origin and the second origin, the force sensor being arranged on the frame in a vicinity of the opening.
The technical measure of the invention is based on the insight that by provision of the force sensor on the frame any signal distortion due to the movement of the first and/or the second working element is avoided. Additionally, the measured force can be made independent of the position of the tissue in the working elements. It is found that by provision of an opening between the first origin and the second origin a force measurement with increased sensitivity is enabled. The opening may be realized by a slit, or by means of one or more bore holes arranged in the area between the first origin and the second origin.
In an embodiment of the instrument according to the invention the first working element is pivotable about a first hinge and/or the second working element is pivotable about a second hinge.
It is found, by virtue of Newton's third law that the forces applied by the first and the second working elements in use to the surrounding, for example to a tissue, manifest themselves as reaction forces to the hinge where about these elements pivot. Therefore, by providing the first and/or the second working elements with a dedicated hinge, the accuracy of the force measurement is improved, in particular because the measured force can be made independent of the position of the tissue in the working element and due to the fact that both force components are measured independently from each other. In addition no vulnerable sensor signals need to be transferred over the rotating hinges, which could cause damage to the sensor wires or fibres.
Preferably, for the force sensor one or more strain sensors are used. Strain sensors can be used to measure force because a force increment dF causes a strain dx as described by Hooke's law: F=E·dx, where k is the modulus of elasticity. Also strain can be used to measure temperature because temperature increment dT causes a material to extend: dx=a·dT, where a is the coefficient of thermal expansion.
In a still further embodiment of the instrument according to the invention a plurality of strain sensors is provided, wherein at least one strain sensor is arranged for measuring a linear sum of several effects such as gripping force, rod pulling force, and vertical force resulting from the rod force, which results in apparent gripping force. The strain sensors may be arranged in the vicinity of the opening to optimize the sensitivity for gripping forces on the tissue.
At least one strain sensor is preferably provided in order to avoid signal misinterpretation due to ambient influences, for example temperature or interfering forces. For example, it is possible that a pair of strain sensors is provided wherein a first strain sensor is used for determining the force exerted by a forceps jaw, wherein the second strain sensor is used as reference for compensating for strain and pressure forces along the frame. Such forces can occur due to pushing or pulling forces on the rod, but can also occur due to manipulation of tissue with the jaws other than gripping. Such an arrangement with extra sensors and how to derive gripping force from them is explained in conjunction with the detailed description of
In addition, it is found that friction in an axis where about a working element is pivotable may cause undesired distortion to the measured signal. By using a suitable plurality of the sensors for measuring a force exerted by a working element force measurement with increased accuracy is enabled by combination of data measured at the plurality of measurement points. In practice this might be implemented by the calibration method elaborated in conjunction with
Preferably, a suitable plurality of strain sensors is integrated on a mutual optical fiber. The fiber may be arranged in a suitable cavity provided in the frame or on a surface of the frame. It will be appreciated that in case when both the first working element and the second working element are pivotable respective pluralities of strain sensors are provided. In this case two optical fibers may be envisaged. More preferably, each optical fiber may be provided in a high-frequency shielded environment for protecting tissue from potentially hazardous influence of high frequency signals transmitted through these fibres.
A single extra sensor cannot be used to compensate for 2 effects. At least 1 extra sensor is needed to compensate for spurious forces and at least 1 other additional sensor is needed to compensate for temperature. Such a temperature reference is preferably put on a part of the frame that doesn't carry mechanical stress. Extra sensors will be explained in more detail with reference to
In a further embodiment of the instrument according to the invention at least one of the working elements comprises a strain sensor arranged for measuring a temperature of the distal end of the instrument.
It is found to be particularly advantageous to build-in a temperature sensor in the distal portion of the instrument. Such measurement may be advantageous during interventions, when it is preferable to measure local tissue temperature prior to any handling. For example, in some cases it might be necessary to determine absence of inflammation, which is characterized by an increase of the local temperature.
In accordance with this feature, force measurements can be carried out independently of the tissue temperature, by means of application of suitable correction factors and/or sensor temperature calibration data. In particular, local deformations of the working elements and/or frame due to temperature differences may be accounted for. As a result a temperature invariant force measurement is enabled. Additionally or alternatively, for example, during coagulation procedure, the distal portion of the instrument can be used to measure temperature of the tissue independently, which is advantageous for preventing excessive tissue damage due to overheating.
In a further embodiment of the instrument according to the invention, the instrument comprises a control unit arranged to determine a feedback signal conceived to be used for controlling the first working element and/or the second working element.
This feature has an advantage that accuracy of the manipulation of the working elements arranged at the distal portion of the apparatus can be substantially increased due to the fact that, first, the respective forces applied by the working elements to the tissue are measured with increased accuracy and, secondly, due to the fact that the relative displacement and mutual position of the working elements is controlled based on the feed-back signal provided by the control unit on basis of suitable analysis of said measured forces. This feature will be explained in more detail with reference to
In a particular embodiment of the instrument according to the invention the one or more strain sensors are implemented as Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors.
It is found to be advantageous to use FBG sensors. An example of the FBG sensor is described in WO01/84097 A1 and will not be explained here in detail. An application of the FBG sensors as strain gauges is advantageous because a wavelength shift is proportional to a degree of strain, which is independent of any loss in the signal intensity thereby improving accuracy of force measurement. Furthermore an FBG doe not comprise any electrical signals near the sensitive measurement area. This is especially important in minimally invasive surgery instruments, which tend to include high voltage and high frequency electrical signals for surgical purposes, such as cutting.
Preferably, a plurality of FBG sensors is integrated on a mutual optical fiber. According to this feature a total number of constructive elements of the instrument is decreased due to the fact that respective signals generated by a suitable plurality of the FBG sensors propagate over a mutual optical fiber. Preferably, the frame of the instrument comprises a cavity and the optical fiber is arranged in said cavity.
These and other aspects of the invention will be discussed in further detail with reference to drawings, wherein like reference signs relate to like elements. It will be appreciated that the drawings are presented for illustrative purposes and may not be used to limit the scope of protection of appended claims.
In accordance to a further aspect of the invention both the first jaw 4 and the second jaw 5 are arranged with dedicated individual hinges 21a, 22a. Due to this the reaction forces applied to a suitable jaw displacement mechanism 21 are measured independently of the position of tissue in the jaws 4 and 5 thereby increasing accuracy of force measurement. Also the sensors 28a and 28b are on the frame 27 and not on any of the moving parts of the distal portion of the device such that vulnerable sensor wiring doesn't have to cross hinges.
The jaw displacement mechanism 21 may be arranged with a suitable plurality of further pivots for enabling an envisaged displacement trajectory of the jaw tips. The mechanism 21 may comprise a doubly segmented bar 20a and 20b, which may be operable by the actuation rod 26 connected to a suitable fitting, for example a bayonet fitting 25.
In accordance with the present embodiment it is possible to measure grip forces of the jaws 4, 5 as well as tangential, radial and axial forces. Measurement of axial Fx and vertical Fz forces as well as tangential momentum My can be easily measured using the depicted apparatus. It will further be appreciated that further forces could be measured by supplementing the arrangement as shown in
In addition, it is possible to provide a supplementary temperature sensor 29 at a tip of one or both working elements. This has an advantage of enabling a direct tissue measurement using working elements 4, 5 post application of coagulation or electrosurgery. In this case the working elements 4, 5 may indicate whether the tissue or the working elements have appropriately cooled down. Preferably, the temperature sensor comprises an FBG sensor.
Detail 30b depicts a left view of the forceps 4, 5, whereby the opening 33 is better visible. It will be appreciated that the sensors 36a, 36b, 37a, 37b may be arranged in a suitable vicinity of the opening 33, it is not necessary to position them exactly above or below the opening for reaching the same effect of improving accuracy of force measurement.
It will be appreciated that
It will be appreciated that embodiment shown in
The detector 67d may comprise a suitable plurality of detector elements and may be arranged to determine a wavelength shift of the impinging radiation beam, for example using an a-prior established correlation between a detector element having a specific position and a wavelength expected at that position. The optical elements may comprise lenses, mirrors, gratings, prisms, or any combination thereof. As a result an accurate system for determining an absolute value of the force exerted by one or more working elements is provided, improving overall reliability of the device.
Preferably, the processing means 67f is arranged to provide a feedback signal conceived to be used for controlling the working elements 60a, 60b. It will be appreciated that the control signal S is related to an absolute value of the force conceived to be applied by the working elements 60a, 60b to the tissue alone or in combination. The control signal S may be supplied to a suitable robot 68 conceived to operate the motor 69 arranged in the proximal end of the instrument 60. Alternatively, the control signal S may be directly applied to the motor 69 arranged in the proximal end of the instrument, as is discussed with reference to
Device according to the invention comprises a frame 71 arranged with a first working elements 74 and a second working element 75, which may be pivotably arranged with respect to the axes 74a, 74b. It will be appreciated that it is also possible that only one of the working elements is pivotably arranged. An opening 73 is provided in a vicinity of respective origins of the first working element and the second working element. In order to measure forces exerted by the first working element and the second working elements the frame 71 may be provided with sensors 76a, 76b, 77a, 77b which may be arranged on respective mutual fiber 78a, 78b. The fibers are preferably provided in a cavity running along the frame 71. Alternatively, the sensors may be arranged on the working elements 74, 75. The first working element and the second working element 74, 75 are controllable by means of a trigger 79, which may be manually operated. The trigger 79 is connected by means of suitable rods 79a, 79b to either or both the first working element 74 and the second working element 75 for enabling suitable displacement thereof. The trigger may be provided with a sensor 72b for measuring a force exerted on the trigger 79.
In accordance with the current embodiment the device 70 comprises a control unit 72c whereto signals from the sensors 72b, 76a, 76b, 77a, 77b are fed. Based on these signals the control unit is arranged to generate a feed-back signal for controlling the actuator 72d of the trigger unit 79 for suitably displacing the first working element 74 and the second working element 75. The actuator 72d may relate to a motor discussed with reference to
In addition, the actuator 83b, may be arranged to feed-back the force exerted by the first working element and the second working element to suitable handles of the trigger 79 so that the operator is provided with accurate indication on the exerted force.
Preferably, sensor S1 only measures the actuation pulling force F3 in the rod operating the first working element 101 and the second working element 102, whereas sensor S2 measures a combination of gripping force F0, actuation pulling force in the rod F3, and vertical component of this rod force acting on the working elements.
The mutual dependencies between forces, lengths, and angles may be written as follows:
The derived forces and angles may then be given by the following:
wherein the subscript “h” or “v” denotes a vertical or a horizontal component, respectively.
The sensor signals S1, S2 depending on the forces, lengths, and angles can be given by:
Constant f gives the ratio between sensor sensitivity for vertical and horizontal forces on the hinges. Constant f might be derived by geometrical analysis, FEM analysis, or calibration of a real instrument.
From this derivation it is clear that the signal from sensor S2 depends on the gripping force F0, the position of tissue in the forceps L0, and the opening angle of the forceps which is linked in a unique way to angle γ. Angle γ can be determined by simply measuring the displacement of the pulling rod, From the resulting equations force F0 and length L0 can be solved if both the sensors S1 and S2 are used.
In practice such an arrangement of sensors would be calibrated before use because both sensors might be sensitive to a combination of forces resulting in a sensitivity. Such sensitivity can be written in a matrix as follows:
From which F0 can be calculated:
Constants a, b, c, and d can be found by performing a measurement where gripping twice with the same force F0 at two different positions in the forceps; at L0,1 and L0,2. This gives four sensor readings; two readings for sensor S1: S1,1 & S1,2, and two readings for sensor S2: S2,1 & S2,2. It then follows by common linear algebra that;
Using these constants an accurate determination of gripping force F0 can be made, as long as the matrix with constants a, b, c, and d is sufficiently well conditioned. This can be accomplished by placing the sensors such that they are linearly independent.
Note that the above calibration is shown for a single opening angle only. For other angles an analytical model as given in
Embodiment 100 has decreased sensitivity for spurious forces because the connecting bars 35a and 35b are positioned horizontally. Angle γ in
It will be appreciated that although the slit between the origins of the first working element and the second working element is depicted to extend in a longitudinal direction, i.e. a direction along the frame 3, it is also possible to arrange the slit in a direction transverse to the direction of the frame. In this case the slit may divide the frame into two parts, each part connected with a working element. Each working element is arranged to transfer a corresponding force towards the part of the frame it cooperates with. In a particular embodiment the slit may be arranged perpendicular to a direction of frame 3 shown in
In the embodiment 100 extra sensors may be provided. The extra sensors can be used to compensate for sensitivity to undesirable forces, such as the forces exerted by the connecting bars 35a, 35b between the working elements 4 and 5 and the rod 39. In such an arrangement sensors 36b/c and 37b/c are mainly measuring the effect of the pulling force in the rod, whereas sensors 36a and 37a are mainly measuring the force exerted by the jaws on the tissue plus an additional component of the rod force caused by the connecting bars 35a and 35b. This extra force depends on the rod force and the opening angle of the jaws. In the configuration of
Sensors 36d and 37d are largely insensitive to any forces but equally sensitive to temperature and can therefore be used to compensate for temperature effects.
While specific embodiments have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described in the foregoing without departing from the scope of the claims set out below. It will further be appreciated that several mechanical layouts of the forceps are possible within the concept of the invention provided a slit or any other opening is arranged between the jaws of the forceps, said opening being arranged to guide the jaw reaction forces to separate parts of the frame of the surgical instrument.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08157291 | May 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL2009/050299 | 5/29/2009 | WO | 00 | 2/16/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/145632 | 12/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5078466 | MacCulloch | Jan 1992 | A |
5269804 | Bales et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5413492 | Obata | May 1995 | A |
5689606 | Hassan | Nov 1997 | A |
5720742 | Zacharias | Feb 1998 | A |
6024514 | Ostergaard | Feb 2000 | A |
6146394 | Morejohn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6389193 | Kimmel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6582451 | Marucci et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6616667 | Steiger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6928947 | Clapham | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934457 | Vincent et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7155316 | Sutherland et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169167 | Chu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210556 | Bath et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7211099 | Lang et al | May 2007 | B2 |
20020188316 | Dingler | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040225323 | Nagase et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060159524 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200049 | Leo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070036506 | Kewitsch | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074584 | Talarico et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078484 | Talarico et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070151391 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080065098 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065111 | Blumenkranz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20110046637 | Patel | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
93 20 348 | May 1994 | DE |
10127506 | Jan 2003 | DE |
1429163 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1660852 | May 2006 | EP |
03005062 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03020139 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03020139 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03056132 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2006010326 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007044684 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007111737 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2009009220 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110137337 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |