Robotically controlled systems such as employed for minimally invasive medical procedures can include large and complex equipment to precisely control and drive relatively small tools or instruments. (As used herein, the terms “robot” or “robotically” and the like include teleoperation or telerobotic aspects.)
Instruments 150 of system 100 can be interchanged by removing one instrument 150 from a drive system 140 and then installing another instrument 150 in place of the instrument removed. The installation process in general requires that the features on disks 153 properly engage complementary features of the drive system 140. However, before installation, the orientations of disks 153 on instrument 150 are generally unknown to patient-side cart 110. Further, equipment such patient-side cart 110 is often covered for a medical procedure by a sterile barrier because of the difficulty in cleaning and sterilizing complex equipment between medical procedures. These sterile barriers can include a sterile adaptor (not shown) that is interposed between docking port 140 and instrument backend 152. For example, above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 7,048,745 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,699,855 to Anderson et al., entitled “Sterile Surgical Adaptor”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describe some exemplary sterile barrier and adaptor systems.
A typical installation process for an instrument 150 involves mounting backend mechanism 152 without regard for the orientations of disks 153 on a drive system 140, possibly with an intervening sterile adaptor. The drive motors in drive system 140 may be then be rotated back and forth multiple times during the installation procedure to ensure that the complementary features mesh with and securely engage each other for operation of the newly installed instrument 150. At some point during the installation process, the drive motors become securely engaged to rotate respective disks 153. However, the instrument 150 being installed may move in an unpredictable manner at times during the installation procedure because the drive motors positively engage respective disks 153 of instrument 150 at different and unpredictable times. Such unpredictable motion is unacceptable when an instrument is inserted in a patient. In general, clear space is required around an instrument 150 to accommodate random movements of the instrument tip during an installation procedure.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a mechanical interface for a robotic medical instrument permits engagement of the instrument and a drive system without causing movement of the tip of the instrument. Accordingly, an instrument can be engaged with the drive system in a patient-side cart after the instrument is manually posed in a desired configuration or even after the instrument has been inserted for a medical procedure. This permits manual insertion of an instrument followed by robotic control of the instrument.
In one embodiment, an instrument interface includes a symmetrical, tapered or cylindrical projection on one of a medical instrument and a drive system (potentially including a sterile barrier) and a complementary bore in the other of the drive system or the instrument. With cylindrical projection and bore, the diameter of the bore can contract, for example, using the tension in a tendon wrapped around the mechanical element containing the bore, to reduce the diameter of the bore and provide the instrument with frictional forces sufficient to transmit driving torque to the medical instrument. In any case, symmetry of the projection and the bore allows the projection to be compression fit into the bore regardless of the rotation angle of the drive system relative to the instrument.
In one specific embodiment of the invention, a system includes a medical instrument and a drive system. The medical instrument includes a rotatable element that when rotated actuates the medical instrument. The drive system has an interface configured to releasably engage the medical instrument, and a first feature of the rotatable element and a second feature of the interface are shaped to engage each other without inducing rotation that actuates the medical instrument.
Another embodiment of the invention is a medical instrument. The medical instrument includes an actuated structure and a mechanical element connected so that rotation of the mechanical element actuates the actuated structure. The mechanical element has an engagement feature shaped such that for any pose of the actuated structure, the engagement feature can engage a complementary engagement feature on a drive system without inducing rotation that actuates the actuated structure.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is a drive system for a medical instrument. The drive system includes a motor; and an interface coupled to the motor and configured to releasably engage the medical instrument so that rotation of the motor actuates the medical instrument. The interface includes an engagement feature shaped such that for any pose of the medical instrument, the engagement feature can engage a complementary engagement feature of the medical instrument without inducing rotation that actuates the medical instrument.
Still another embodiment of the invention is a method for engaging a medical instrument and a drive system. The method includes bringing a first feature on a rotatable element of the medical instrument into contact with a second feature on a drive element of the drive system without rotating either of the elements. An engagement force is then applied to create friction between the rotatable element and the drive element without rotating either of the elements. When thus engaged, the drive system can be operated to actuate the medical instrument, and the friction transfers torque that the drive system applies to the first rotatable element to the second rotatable element and thereby actuates the mechanical instrument.
Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a medical instrument can be installed on and engaged with a drive system without actuating or otherwise moving the joints or tip of the instrument. Engagement without actuation can be implemented using symmetric mechanical elements that securely engage through compression or friction to maintain the relative orientation of a drive mechanism and the mechanical interface of the instrument. In one embodiment, a symmetric tapered shaft of a drive system or a backend mechanism fits into a symmetric tapered bore or slot in a mechanical element of the backend mechanism or drive system, and friction maintains the orientation of the shaft and the slotted mechanical element. In another specific embodiment, a symmetric shaft can be inserted into a mechanical element containing a bore that contracts in diameter to securely hold the relative orientation of the shaft and the mechanical element. For example, a shaft of a drive motor can fit into a bore within a capstan that is sufficiently flexible that tension in a tendon wrapped around the capstan causes the bore to collapse onto the shaft. The ability to install an instrument without actuating the instrument allows posing of the instrument in a desired configuration before the instrument is installed on a drive system and allows installation of an instrument after the instrument has been inserted into a cannula or even into a patient.
Tapered shafts 230 can be simple, low cost, and robust mechanical elements that are precisely machined using conventional techniques to produce a tapered shape with a circular cross-section. Many types of tapers could be employed on tapered shafts 230. For example, Morse tapers with or without an end tang or guide could be used. Tapered shafts 230 are free to spin on their axis and are symmetric about their respective rotation axes, i.e., have circular cross-sections.
Each tapered shaft 220 is further shaped to fit into a complementary tapered hole 250 or slot in a mechanical element 260 of backend mechanism 210. Mechanical element 260 may be, for example, a hollowed-out spindle having a tapered hole 250 that matches the shape of the corresponding tapered shaft 230 and in particular has circular cross-sections matching those of tapered shafts 220. More generally, tapered holes 250 can be formed in any mechanical elements 260 of instrument backend 210 that are free to spin on their axis, where a mechanical transmission system of backend mechanism 210 converts the rotations of the slotted mechanical elements 260 into movements of tendons 155 and instrument tip 156. For example,
Instrument engagement using the system of
Control of medical instrument 200 after engagement of backend mechanism 210 and drive system 220 can be based on a measurement of the pose (e.g., the positions of joints) of medical instrument 210 and measurements of the rotation angles of each of motors 240. Alternatively, a control process using differences between measured and desired instrument pose or configuration could be employed. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/945,734, entitled, “Tension Control in Actuation of Multi-Joint Medical Instruments” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/780,417, entitled “Drive Force Control in Medical Instrument Providing Position Measurements” describe exemplary systems for control of medical instruments and are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a motor in a drive system can operate a mechanical element of a backend mechanism through a frictional engagement created by radial compression of a hole or bore in a mechanical element.
The process of engaging the instrument on a drive system including motor 240 may further begin with tendon 655 being sufficiently relaxed so that shaft 630 (with or without an interposed portion of a sterile barrier) can slide into the bore of mechanical element 660, without any rotation of mechanical element 660. Shaft 630 and the bore of mechanical element 660 can be symmetrical (e.g., have a circular cross-section) so that shaft 630 can be inserted into mechanical element 660 regardless of the relative orientation of shaft 630 and mechanical element 660. A mechanism within the backend mechanism can then increase or apply the pre-tension to tendon 655 to cause the wraps of tendon 655 to clamp flexible mechanical element 660 on shaft 630. For example, displacing a capstan in a proximal direction relative to the body of an instrument can increase the tension in both ends of a tendon extending from the capstan, causing opposing torques on a joint coupled to the ends of tendon 655. As a result, no joint movement occurs when the tension is increased. Alternatively, when only one end of tendon 655 attaches to an articulated joint, pre-tension in tendon 655 can be preset to permit insertion of shaft 630 (with at least one smooth, cylindrical interface between the capstan, sterile barrier, and input shaft) into capstan 660, so that capstan 660 couples more strongly to shaft 630 when driven in a direction that increases tension in tendon 655. Capstan 660 may then be permitted to slip relative to shaft 630 when driven in the reverse direction.
Motor shaft 630 and the bore of mechanical element 660 do not have tapering that accommodates misalignment in the same manner as embodiments of the invention using tapered shafts and holes. However, compliance can be provided in shaft 630 or capstan 660 to accommodate initial misalignment of motor 240 and capstan 660 during an engagement process.
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This patent document is a continuation-in-part and claims the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/286,644, filed Sep. 30, 2008 and also claims benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 61/485,702, filed May 13, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4117359 | Wehde | Sep 1978 | A |
4259876 | Belyanin et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4281447 | Miller et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4283165 | Vertut | Aug 1981 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6139245 | Hofmeister | Oct 2000 | A |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7316681 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331967 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7699855 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727244 | Orban, III | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7886743 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7947050 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947051 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8333755 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8551115 | Steger et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8644988 | Prisco et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020087048 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040035243 | Duval | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050277875 | Selkee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060235436 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070156019 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232858 | Macnamara et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070287992 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065102 | Cooper | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087871 | Schena | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103491 | Omori et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090062813 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088774 | Swarup et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100082041 | Prisco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100170519 | Romo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100318101 | Choi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015650 | Choi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110213383 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110282359 | Duval | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282491 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120123441 | Au et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120289974 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2626684 | Jul 2004 | CN |
102014759 | Apr 2011 | CN |
H06114000 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H10249777 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2002200091 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003024336 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2005288590 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006061364 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2008104854 | May 2008 | JP |
2012504016 | Feb 2012 | JP |
WO-2007136783 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2010039387 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/037269, mailed on Sep. 19, 2012, 10 pages. |
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 20140021913 filed Feb. 7, 2008, 10 pages. |
PCT/US09/55727 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Feb. 3, 2010, 9 pages. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2015 for Japanese Application No. 20140021913 filed Feb. 7, 2008, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120289973 A1 | Nov 2012 | US | |
20130331857 A9 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61485702 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12286644 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13360395 | US |