Instrumentation and methods for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10350088
  • Patent Number
    10,350,088
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 1, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 16, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
Embodiments of instrumentation and methods are provided for the insertion of intervertebral disc prosthesis. The instrumentation of the embodiments comprises a guide comprising at least two lateral faces, at least one upper plate, at least one lower plate, at least one retainer, a cage defining an insertion axis for the prosthesis, and an angle adjuster adapted to adjust an angle formed by the insertion axis and an antero-posterior sagittal axis; and at least one separator sized to maintain a gap between the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra. Methods for implanting a prosthesis using the disclosed instrumentation comprise implanting a pin in the median sagittal axis of a vertebrae; measuring the dimensions of the intervertebral space; choosing the prosthesis; choosing the guide; adjusting the angle adjuster; positioning the guide adjacent to the intervertebral space; inserting the prosthesis into the guide; and inserting the prosthesis into the intervertebral space.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to instrumentation for inserting intervertebral disc prostheses.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Various types of instruments for inserting intervertebral disc prostheses are known, such as those disclosed in the French patent application FR0405899000 filed by the applicant. These instruments only allow insertion by anterior access, along the antero-posterior axis of the prosthesis. Preparation of the vertebrae between which the prosthesis is to be implanted by this type of instrumentation therefore requires opening the tissue covering these vertebrae and pushing aside the blood vessels on the anterior face of the spinal column, which generates a risk for the patient.


The embodiments disclosed herein provide instrumentation and methods that allow insertion of a prosthesis between the vertebrae, laterally or obliquely, while appropriately positioning the prosthesis in relation to the sagittal plane and the coronal plane.


Embodiments of instrumentation for the insertion of intervertebral disc prosthesis between vertebrae in accordance with the present invention comprise a guide and at least one separator. In preferred embodiments, the guide has at least two lateral faces, at least one upper plate, at least one lower plate, at least one retainer, a cage defining an insertion axis for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and having open posterior and anterior faces, and an angle adjuster adapted to adjust the angle formed by the insertion axis and an antero-posterior median sagittal axis of the vertebrae. The separators are sized to maintain a gap between the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra that is sufficient for insertion of the intervertebral disc prosthesis through the guide into the intervertebral space. For the disclosed embodiments, during the insertion of the intervertebral disc prosthesis the upper plate is disposed proximal to a plane substantially coincident with the lower surface of the upper vertebra, and the lower plate is disposed proximal to a plane substantially coincident with the upper surface of the lower vertebra. The upper plate and the lower plate are separated by a distance approximately equal to the height of the intervertebral disc prosthesis. The angle adjuster is adapted to position the guide opposite the intervertebral space between the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra and to adjust an angle formed by the insertion axis and an antero-posterior median sagittal axis defined by the intersection of a midline, substantially vertical, sagittal plane and a transverse, substantially horizontal, plane of the spinal column.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the angle adjuster comprises at least one sighting device configured for visual adjustment of the angle between the insertion axis and the antero-posterior median sagittal axis.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the angle adjuster comprises a sighting device configured for operation with at least one pin implanted into at least one of the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra and approximately oriented with the antero-posterior median sagittal axis of said vertebra to align said sighting device with the antero-posterior median sagittal axis.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises:


at least one pin for implantation into at least one of the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra in approximate orientation with the antero-posterior median sagittal axis of said vertebra;


at least one offset adjuster adjustably linking the angle adjuster to the at least one pin.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises:


at least one contact adjuster disposed approximately parallel to the insertion axis;


a coupling between the at least one contact adjuster and the angle adjuster allowing movement of the angle adjuster with respect to the at least one contact adjuster;


a connector configured to move along the longitudinal axis of the pin and to connect the at least one offset adjuster to the at least one pin.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the at least one pin comprises a sharp point.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the angle adjuster comprises at least one adjustment gauge indicating at least one parameter concerning the position of the guide relative to the vertebrae.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the adjustment gauge comprises a lateral offset gauge comprising a pointer pointing to graduations indicating the lateral offset of the guide from the antero-posterior median sagittal axis of the vertebrae.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the adjustment gauge comprises an angle gauge comprising a pointer pointing to radial graduations indicating the angle between the insertion axis of the intervertebral disc prosthesis and the antero-posterior median sagittal axis of the vertebrae.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises a tightener that selectively allows or prevents rotation of the angle adjuster with respect to the guide, thereby permitting adjustment and fixation of the angle between the insertion axis of the intervertebral disc prosthesis and the antero-posterior median sagittal axis.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the at least one retainer comprises at least one groove permitting the at least one separator to slide within the groove.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the at least one retainer comprises at least one shaft providing at least one axis of rotation for the at least one separator.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the guide further comprises a stop limiting the rotation of the at least one separator about the at least one axis of rotation.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the rotation of an at least one separator is limited by an adjustable stop enabling to set the extent to which the rotation is limited.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the guide comprises at least one channel oriented substantially parallel to the insertion axis of the intervertebral disc prosthesis and configured to guide at least one part protruding from at least one surface of the intervertebral disc prosthesis.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the insertion axis of the intervertebral disc prosthesis through the guide is oriented approximately parallel to a longitudinal centerline of the guide passing through the open anterior and posterior faces of the cage.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the insertion axis of the intervertebral disc prosthesis through the guide is not oriented approximately parallel to a longitudinal centerline of the guide passing through the open anterior and posterior faces of the cage.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises at least one chisel having at least one blade and suitable shape and dimension for engagement with the guide and for cutting at least one notch in a vertebra.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the chisel comprises a shaft, a handle at the end of the shaft opposite the at least one blade, and an adjustable stop limiting the travel of the chisel inside the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the chisel comprises two blades and a spacer of suitable dimension to separate the blades by a distance approximately equal to the height of the intervertebral space.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises an impactor having a shaft, a handle at one end of the shaft for manipulating the impactor, and at the other end of the shaft a pusher having shape and dimensions substantially conforming to at least one edge of the intervertebral disc prosthesis contacted by the pusher during use.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the impactor has an adjustable stop limiting the travel of the impactor inside the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises a holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and wherein the guide comprises a recess providing clearance for holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis sufficient to position the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the instrumentation further comprises a holder for the guide engaging at least two notches of the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the holder for the guide is configured to engage the at least two notches of the guide without interfering with engagement of a recess of the guide by tools for accessing the intervertebral space or by the holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis.


Methods for inserting intervertebral disc prostheses between two vertebrae are also provided.


General steps for preparing the vertebral site for insertion of an intervertebral disc prosthesis between two vertebrae are known, and are not an aspect of the inventive method disclosed herein. In general, such preparatory steps comprise removal of the natural biological intervertebral disc, clearing the intervertebral space, and maintaining a gap between the upper vertebra and lower vertebra with a known instrument.


Methods for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis in accordance with the present invention can be performed using instrumentation comprising at least one pin and a guide having at least one upper plate, at least one lower plate, a cage defining an insertion axis for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and having open posterior and anterior faces, and an angle adjuster. In a preferred embodiment, a method according the present invention comprises:

    • implanting at least one pin in the median sagittal axis of one of the two vertebrae;
    • measuring the dimensions of the intervertebral space;
    • choosing the intervertebral disc prosthesis to be implanted;
    • choosing the guide to be used;
    • adjusting the angle adjuster based on an antero-posterior median sagittal axis of the spinal column, defined by the intersection of a midline, substantially vertical, sagittal plane and a transverse, substantially horizontal, plane of the spinal column, on the dimensions of the intervertebral space and on the obstacles to access to the intervertebral space, in order to set a desired angle between the insertion axis for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and the antero-posterior median sagittal axis;
    • positioning the guide adjacent to the intervertebral space at the desired angle;
    • inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide through the open posterior face of the cage; and
    • inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space through the open anterior face of the cage.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises a step of adjusting an offset adjuster for setting a lateral offset of the guide relative to the antero-posterior median sagittal axis.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the step of inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space is performed using an impactor comprising a shaft and an adjustable stop, said step further comprising adjustment of the stop and the application of a thrust to the impactor.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the step of adjusting the angle adjuster is performed using a sighting device for aligning the guide with the antero-posterior median sagittal axis, said step further comprising placement of the sighting device in contact with the at least one pin.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises a step of adjusting an offset adjuster of adjustable length connecting the angle adjuster of the guide to a connector connected to the pin, this adjusting step being implemented thanks to the measurements of the intervertebral space.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the step of positioning the guide adjacent to the intervertebral space further comprises translation of the guide along an axis substantially parallel to the antero-posterior median sagittal axis until the guide is proximal to the vertebrae.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises the insertion of one or more separators into the intervertebral space.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises the engagement of at least one of the one or more separators with at least one retainer of the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the step of positioning the guide is performed with a holder for the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the step of inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide is performed with a holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis, the guide comprising a recess providing clearance sufficient for the holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis to position the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the step of positioning the guide is performed with a holder for the guide configured to engage at least two notches of the guide to provide clearance for tools for accessing the intervertebral space.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises, before inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space, the step of preparing the intervertebral space using a chisel having at least one blade, an adjustable stop and suitable shape and dimension for engagement with the guide and for cutting at least one notch in at least one vertebra.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises the step of clearing the intervertebral space of the bone debris generated by cutting the notch.


According to another feature in an embodiment, the method further comprises a step of removing the guide, the one or more separators, and the at least one pin after the step of inserting the intervertebral disc intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space.


Other features and advantages of the invention will become clearer upon reading the following description of various embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 represents a perspective view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention, with a pin implanted in a vertebra and the guide facing the intervertebral space located above this vertebra.



FIG. 2 represents a top view of the instrumentation represented in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 represents a side view of the instrumentation in FIG. 1, seen from the posterior face of the guide.



FIGS. 4A and 4B represent, respectively, a perspective view and a top view of the guide according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 5A and 5B represent perspective views of another embodiment of the guide of the instrumentation, respectively, before and after the introduction of the separating elements in the guide.



FIGS. 6A and 6B represent, respectively, a top view and a side view of the chisel according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 6C and 6D represent, respectively, a top view and a side view of the impactor on an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 7A and 7B represent a perspective view of an embodiment of the invention, when using a chisel.



FIG. 7B presents further details of FIG. 7A.



FIGS. 8A and 8B represent a top view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention, when using the chisel and, respectively, before and after the penetration of the chisel into the vertebra.



FIG. 9A represents a perspective view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention, when using the impactor.



FIG. 9B presents further details of FIG. 9A.



FIG. 10A represents a top view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention, during the insertion of the prosthesis in the guide.



FIG. 10B represents a top view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention, when using the impactor pushing the prosthesis inside the guide.



FIG. 11A represents a transparent view of the instrumentation according to an embodiment of the invention, when the prosthesis is being pushed into the intervertebral space by the impactor according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 11b represents a prosthesis in place in the intervertebral space after the impactor has been removed.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The invention relates to an instrumentation and methods for inserting intervertebral disc prostheses (P) between vertebrae (Vi, Vs). The invention complements general surgical instruments and methods. The following description presents different, non-restrictive, embodiments of devices and methods according to various features of the invention. The different structures and steps in the various embodiments can be incorporated in the other embodiments in various combinations.


In a preferred embodiment, the instrumentation comprises a guide (1) in the shape of an open cage that can slide, by use of a movable connector (22), on at least one pin (2) implanted into a vertebra. Two pins (2), one implanted in upper vertebra (Vs) and the other implanted in the lower vertebra (Vs), and two movable connectors (22), can also be used.


Various elements of the embodiments described herein involve an antero-posterior reference axis (S). The determination of this antero-posterior reference axis will be apparent to the surgeon using the embodiments of the instrumentation and methods described. In general, the antero-posterior reference axis will lie along the intersection of a plane substantially coincident with a median sagittal (a substantially vertical plane along the midline of the spine) and a plane substantially coincident with a horizontal plane (a transverse plane, along the antero-posterior axis of the vertebrae and substantially horizontal), although other orientations may be appropriate depending on the particular characteristics of the spine and vertebrae and/or on the choice of the surgeon. For example, the antero-posterior reference axis (S) may not lie along the midline sagittal plane of the spine and may thus be Para-Sagittal and it can be inclined leftward or rightward in the antero-posterior direction of the vertebrae. The antero-posterior reference axis (S) may also not be aligned along the horizontal plane of the vertebrae and may thus be inclined upward or downward in the antero-posterior direction of the vertebrae.


A holder (not represented) for the guide can be used to place the guide (1) over the pin (2) and to make it slide until it is proximal with the vertebrae. In a preferred embodiment, the guide (1) comprises two lateral faces, at least one upper plate (17) and at least one lower plate (18) which together form a cage intended to receive the prosthesis (P) through its open posterior face and allow the insertion through its open anterior face of the prosthesis (P) between the lower (Vi) and upper (Vs) vertebrae. In use of the instrumentation, separators (10), comprising, for example, substantially rectangular plates having dimensions adapted to the height of the prosthesis (P) (generally without regard to any osteal anchors), are placed approximately parallel to the lateral faces of the guide (1) and in proximity to the lateral faces. Separators (10) maintain a sufficient gap between the vertebrae and, co-operating with the guide (1), allow the insertion of the prosthesis (P) between the vertebrae. A holder (not represented) of the prosthesis (P) allows placement of the prosthesis (P) inside the guide (1). An impactor (4) is provided for pushing the prosthesis (P) through the open cage of the guide into the intervertebral space.


Various embodiments of the invention will now further be described in detail in reference to the drawings. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, the guide (1) has a cage through which the prosthesis will be inserted until it reaches the intervertebral space. The cage is open on its anterior and posterior faces. The guide (1) comprises lateral faces, at least one upper plate (17) and at least one lower plate (18). In the embodiments represented in the drawings, the guide (1) has a shape substantially of a parallelepiped, with its upper plate (17) and lower plate (18) approximately parallel to each other. In an alternative embodiment (not represented), the upper plate (17) and lower plate (18) are not approximately parallel to each other and the guide (1) has, in coronal (frontal) section, a substantially trapezoidal shape. In this alternative embodiment, the separators (10) could, according to the insertion angle (A1) of the prosthesis (P), comprise non-rectangular plates such as trapezoidal plates, and/or could have different dimensions from one lateral face of the guide (1) to the other. A trapezoidal embodiment is especially suitable for implanting a prosthesis having upper and lower surfaces form an angle, thus imposing an inclination on the vertebrae between which they are intended to be implanted.


In the embodiment represented in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the guide (1) has solid lateral faces comprising substantially rectangular plates, whereas in the embodiments represented in the other figures, the lateral faces of the guide are open and comprise rods linking the upper plate (17) and lower plate (18). However, as mentioned above, the different structures described for the various embodiments of the instruments of the invention can be adapted to other instruments and/or other embodiments. Thus, the guide (1) could have open lateral faces in the embodiment represented in FIGS. 5A and 5B or even have solid lateral faces in the embodiments represented in the other figures.


The guide (1) comprises, proximate to its lateral faces, retainer (100) allowing it to co-operate with separators (10) used to maintain a gap between the vertebrae before and during the insertion of the prosthesis. The separators (10) have a shape and dimensions adapted to the height of the prosthesis (P) (generally without regard to any osteal anchors), allowing for maintenance of a sufficient gap between the vertebrae (Vi, Vs) for the introduction of the prosthesis (P) into the intervertebral space. The height of the cage of the guide (1) is adapted to the height of the prosthesis (generally without regard to any osteal anchors). Guides of different heights generally will be used for prostheses of different heights. The width of the cage of the guide (1), however, can be configured to allow the same guide to be used for the implanting of prostheses of substantially different widths, as for the two prostheses represented in FIGS. 11A and 11B. When a guide (1) is used for prostheses of substantially different widths, preferred embodiments use guiding channels (11) engaging osteal anchors on the prostheses to guide the prostheses during insertion. A surgeon, however, will preferably use a guide (1) having a size most suitable to the dimensions of and the encumbrances of access to the intervertebral space, and will implant a prosthesis having a size most suitable to the dimensions of the guide (1) and the intervertebral space.


In the embodiments represented in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the retainer (100) of the guide (1) comprises grooves on each of the lateral edges of each of the lower (18) and upper (17) plates of the guide (1). The grooves receive the separators (10), and permit the separators (10) to co-operate with the guide (1) by sliding in the grooves (100). The sliding of the separators (10) in relation to these retainers (100) allows a translation of the guide (1) in relation to the separators (10). Thus, the separators (10) could be inserted between the vertebrae (Vs, Vi) before or after the positioning of the guide (1). For example, this embodiment also allows to remove the guide (1) once the prosthesis has been implanted, while leaving the separators (10) in place between the vertebrae (Vs, Vi) to allow proper positioning of the prosthesis.


In the embodiments represented in FIGS. 1 to 4 and 7 to 11, the retainer (100) of the guide comprises shafts located proximally to the lateral faces of the guide (1). These shafts provide axes of rotation about which the separators (10) may rotate. In these embodiments of retainer (100), as seen in FIGS. 1 and 2 stops limiting the rotation can be disposed proximal to the lateral faces, towards the exterior of the guide, limiting rotation of the separators (10) about their respective axis of rotation (100). In a preferred embodiment, these stops comprise a rod (13a) having a distance to the anterior face of the guide (1) that is less than the distance of the axis of rotation (100) of the separators (10) to the anterior face of the guide (1). In another embodiment, the stops are adjustable and comprise, for example, at least one conical part (13b) screwed into at least the upper (17) or lower (18) plates of the guide. The depth of the adjustable stop can be set using the screw threads, and will adjust the limit on the rotation of the separators (10) about their axis of rotation (100). The stops limiting the rotation of the separators (10) about their axis of rotation can also comprise, as in the embodiment represented in FIGS. 4A and 4B, studs (13a) attached to the separators (10) and projecting into an opening or recess made in at least one of the lower plate (18) and upper plate (17). In this embodiment of stops (13a), the relative sizes of these studs and the opening or recess can be used to establish the limit on the rotational freedom of the separators (10).


In a preferred embodiment, instrumentation according to the invention comprises at least a pin (2) having a sharp point (21) intended to be implanted into an antero-posterior reference axis (S) of one of the vertebrae (Vi, Vs) between which the prosthesis (P) is to be implanted. Implanting the pin (2) into a vertebra provides a reference that, in conjunction with other structure of the guide (1), permits targeting the point (C) onto which the prosthesis (P) is to be centred in the intervertebral space. The guide (1) comprises at least one angle adjuster (12) allowing adjustment of the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) in relation to the antero-posterior reference axis (S) of the vertebrae, and thus the angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S). The intersection between the insertion axis (X) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S) defines a point which can be set to coincide with the point (C) onto which the prosthesis (P) is to be centred in the intervertebral space. The antero-posterior reference axis (S) may lie along the intersection of a plane substantially coincident with a median sagittal plane and a plane substantially coincident with a horizontal plane, although other orientations may be appropriate depending on the particular characteristics of the spine and vertebrae and/or depending on the choice of the surgeon.


In the embodiments represented in FIGS. 4A, 4B, 5A and 5B, the angle adjuster (12) comprises a sighting device having, for instance, a back sight intended to cooperate with at least one pin (2) implanted in the median sagittal axis of at least one vertebra. The back sight preferably has a suitable shape and dimension to cooperate with the pin (2) to allow the back sight to be placed against the pin and to slide the guide (1) along the pin, thereby permitting a suitable positioning of the guide (1) along the antero-posterior reference axis (S). By providing stable placement of the guide (1) with reference to the antero-posterior reference axis (S), the sighting device (12) also facilitates adjustment (either visually or by use of a gauge or other device) of the angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S) of the vertebrae (Vi, Vs).


In the embodiments represented in FIGS. 1 to 3 and 7 to 11, an offset adjuster (120) of adjustable length links the angle adjuster (12) to a connector (22) that can slide on pin (2). For one embodiment, the offset adjuster (120) comprises a rod with one end fixed to the connector (22) and the opposite end threaded to mate with a treaded hole in the angle adjuster (12). In another of the various alternative embodiments, the offset adjuster (120) comprises a rod attached to connector (22) but freely rotatable with respect to connector (22). In such alternative embodiment, offset adjuster (120) can be screwed in the threaded hole in angle adjuster (12) even when connector (22) is in place on pin (2). For example, a six-sided hole can be formed in the threaded end of offset adjuster (120) and used to rotate offset adjuster (120) with known tools.


The guide (1) can also comprise at least one contact adjuster (110). In various embodiments of contact adjusters (110), the contact adjuster (110) is disposed approximately parallel to the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P). The angle adjuster (12) is configured to slide along the contact adjuster (110), although other adjustable couplings between the angle adjuster (12) and the contact adjuster (110) are readily apparent. In this arrangement, angle adjuster (12) can be set to the desired angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S), and by adjusting the distance between angle adjuster (12) and connector (22) using offset adjuster (120), the intersection point between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S) of the vertebrae can be made to coincide with the point (C) on which the prosthesis (P) is to be centered. By moving the angle adjuster (12) along the contact adjuster (110), the guide (1) can be brought proximal to the vertebrae (Vi, Vs) while maintaining the connector (22) in the desired proximity to the adjacent vertebra.


In various embodiments, the angle adjuster (12) of the guide (1) comprises an adjustment gauge. The adjustment gauge can be configured to indicate one or more adjustment of the guide (1), including, for example, the angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S) and/or the length of the offset distance between angle adjuster (12) and connector (22).


The adjustment gauge embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2 comprises a lateral offset gauge. In this embodiment, the lateral offset gauge indicates the length of the offset distance between angle adjuster (12) and connector (22), indirectly measuring the offset of the guide (1) laterally from the antero-posterior reference axis (S). The lateral offset gauge comprises a pointer (1211) attached to the angle adjuster (12) and located proximal to graduations (1212) made in a surface of the offset adjuster (120). The position of the pointer (1211) in relation to the graduations (1212) indicates the length of the offset distance between angle adjuster (12) and connector (22) and therefore the lateral offset of the guide (1) in relation to the pin (2).


The adjustment gauge embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2 further comprises an angle gauge indicating the angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S). In this embodiment, the angle gauge comprises a pointer (1221) attached to the angle adjuster (12) and located proximal to radial graduations (1222) made in the surface of the guide (1). The position of the pointer (1221) in relation to the graduations (1222) indicates the angle (A1) along which the prosthesis (P) will be implanted in relation to the antero-posterior reference axis (S) of the vertebrae (Vs, Vi).


In an alternative embodiment, a tightener is provided that selectively allows or prevents rotation of the angle adjuster (12) with respect to the cage of the guide (1). The tightener permits adjustment of the angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and the antero-posterior reference axis (S) by allowing rotation of the angle adjuster (12), and permits fixation of that angle (A1) in proper adjustment by preventing rotation of the angle adjuster (12).


In the disclosed embodiments, the pin (2) is intended to be implanted in a horizontal transverse plane of the vertebrae. Two pins (2) can also be used, along with two angle adjuster (12), for example, placed one on one of the upper plate (17) and one on the lower plate (18) as shown in FIG. 3. However, the instrumentation also may use a pin (2) to be implanted other than in a horizontal transverse plane of the vertebrae. For example, the pin (2) may be implanted in an inclined manner in the sagittal plane with its point (21) oriented towards the bottom of the spinal column. In that configuration, the guide (1) could be provided with a single angle adjuster (12) on one of the upper plate (17) or lower plate (18), but still be held in the suitable horizontal position by using to the adjustable offset adjuster (120) and the angle adjuster (12).


Some prostheses have osteal anchors (51) on the surfaces that contact adjacent vertebrae. For example, winglets on the prosthesis can be provided to engage notches made in the surfaces of the vertebrae. The surfaces of the vertebrae engaged by the osteal anchors (51) of this type of prosthesis therefore must be prepared before insertion of the prosthesis. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment the instrumentation comprises a chisel (3) used to prepare intervertebral space. The chisel (3) has suitable shape and dimension to penetrate into the open cage of the guide (1) and pass through the guide (1) to make cuttings on the vertebrae that will be engaged by an osteal anchor (51). In a preferred embodiment, at least one plate among the upper (17) and lower (18) plates of the guide (1) comprises a guiding channel (11) oriented along the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P). This guiding channel (11) has a shape and dimensions adapted to the shape and dimensions of an osteal anchor (51) of the prosthesis (P). The notch made in the vertebra using the chisel (3) assists centering of the prosthesis in relation to the point (C). In the embodiments represented in the drawings, the guiding channel (11) defining the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis is not approximately parallel to the longitudinal centerline (L) passing through the anterior and posterior open faces of the guide (1), but the guiding channel (11) can obviously be made so as to define an insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis approximately parallel to the longitudinal centerline passing through the anterior and posterior faces of the guide (1).


In a preferred embodiment, the chisel (3) comprises a shaft (30) having, at one of its ends, at least one blade (32) of suitable shape and dimension for engagement with the guiding channel (11) of the guide (1) and for cutting a notch in a vertebra complementary with the shape and dimension of an osteal anchor (51). The shaft has, at its other end, a handle (35) allowing positioning of the blade (32) into the guiding channel (11) manipulating of the chisel to make a notch in the vertebra for the osteal anchor (51) of the prosthesis (P). An adjustable stop (31) on the shaft (30) can limit the travel of the chisel (3) in the axis (X) of the guide (1) and therefore limit the length of the notch, which can correspond to length of the osteal anchor (51). In the embodiment in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the chisel (3) comprises two blades (32) held apart from each other by a spacer (33) of suitable dimension to separate the blades (32) by a distance approximately equal to the height of the intervertebral disc prosthesis (P) (generally without regard to any osteal anchors). Using two guiding channels (11), the chisel (3) can be used to simultaneously form two notches of suitable dimensions and positions to receive the osteal anchors (51) assembled on the upper and lower surfaces of the prosthesis (P).


In an embodiment of the invention, the instrumentation comprises an impactor (4) as shown in FIGS. 6C and 6D used to move the prosthesis (P) through the cage of the guide (1) into the intervertebral space. The impactor (4) comprises a shaft (40), a handle (45) at one end of the shaft for manipulating the impactor, and at the other end of the shaft a pusher (42) having shape and dimensions substantially conforming to the edges of the intervertebral disc prosthesis (P) contacted by the pusher (42) during use. The height and width of the pusher (42) can be substantially equal, respectively, to the height (generally without regard to any osteal anchors) and the width of the prosthesis (P). An adjustable stop (41) on the shaft (40) of the impactor (4) can limit the travel of the impactor (4) in the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis (P) and therefore control the depth to which the prosthesis (P) will be inserted into the intervertebral space. The stop (41) therefore can assist centering the prosthesis (P) in relation to the point (C).


In an embodiment of the invention, the instrumentation can comprise a holder (not shown) for the prosthesis (P). As shown in the drawings, at least one of the upper plate (17) and the lower plate (18) comprises a recess (111) providing clearance of the holder for the prosthesis (P) and allowing the prosthesis (P) to be placed in the guide (1) with the holder. Such holder for the prosthesis (P) may consist, for example, of forceps or pliers or tweezers of a known type, with shape and dimensions adapted to insert the prosthesis (P) in the guide (1) by engaging the recess (111).


In an embodiment of the invention, the instrumentation can comprise a holder (not shown) for the guide (1). The holder can assist positioning the guide (1) in suitable position in contact with the vertebrae (Vi, Vs). The holder co-operates with at least two notches (112) made on at least one of the upper plate (17) and the lower plate (18). As represented in drawings, the notches (112) are located in the recess (111) of the guide (1). Such holder for the guide (1) may consist, for example, of dilating forceps or opening pliers, or opening tweezers of a known type, with shape and dimensions adapted to co-operate with the notches (112) while leaving the recess (111) accessible to forceps or pliers or suitable tools for accessing the intervertebral space. For example, the holder for the guide (1) may consist of opening pliers having opening ends curved in a direction approximately orthogonal to the direction of the opening of the pliers. These curved ends thus co-operate with the notches (112) in the recess (111) and may have dimensions adapted so that, when they co-operate with the notches (112), they do not substantially protrude from the notches (112) inside the recess (111). Such holder will thus hold the guide (1) while leaving a recess (111) accessible for the clearance of pliers or small tweezers or any suitable tools for accessing the intervertebral space through the guide (1). The recess (111) may also be accessible for the clearance of the holder for the prosthesis (P) and for the positioning of the prosthesis (P) into the guide (1), if the holder has still not been removed at this step.


The various embodiments of the invention described above provide instrumentation for implanting an intervertebral disc prosthesis (P) between the vertebrae (Vs, Vi). The use of the instrumentation will now be described, providing detail of the steps taken to implant the prosthesis.


As aforementioned, the invention compliments general surgical instruments and methods, which are not an aspect of the inventive method disclosed herein and will not be described. In addition, the prerequisite steps for preparing the patient and access to the vertebrae, for example from the anterior face, will not be described in detail. Prior to the implanting itself of the prosthesis (P), the surgeon creates an access to the vertebrae and removes the fibro-cartilaginous tissue of the natural biological intervertebral disc. Generally, separators (tweezers, according to a commonly used designation) of a known type maintain a gap between the vertebrae during the removal of the natural biological disc by the surgeon. The natural gap of the vertebrae will have been measured beforehand to determine the height (generally without regard to any osteal anchors) of the prosthesis (P) to be implanted in the intervertebral space and, consequently, the height of the guide (1) that is to be chosen for implantation. Measuring the height of the intervertebral space also allows determination of the height of the separators (10), which is chosen to maintain the gap required for inserting the prosthesis (P) between the vertebrae. The guide (1) will thus be chosen according to the height of these separators (10) and the dimensions of the prosthesis (P) in the horizontal plane, which will depend on the dimensions of the vertebrae and the encumbrances to accessing the intervertebral space.


During the removal of the natural biological disc by the surgeon, separators (tweezers) commonly used are too cumbersome for the rest of the operation and are thus replaced by a wedge (called “spacer” or “bougie”, according to a commonly used designation in English or French, respectively) whose height will have been chosen so as to preserve the natural gap of the vertebrae and to correspond to the height of the prosthesis (P) (generally without regard to any osteal anchors).


The removal of the natural biological intervertebral disc can be preceded or followed by a step of implanting at least one pin (2) of the instrumentation in at least one of the vertebrae (Vi, Vs) between which the prosthesis is to be implanted. So that the pin (2) provides a symmetrical reference in relation to the vertebrae, the implanting of the pin (2) is performed by placing it, preferably horizontally, along the antero-posterior reference axis (S) of the vertebra. The dimensions of the guide (1) chosen for implanting the prosthesis will affect the height in the vertebra for implantation of pin (2), which should enable the angle adjuster (12) to place the guide (1) opposite the intervertebral space with its upper plate (17) and lower plate (18) in contact with the respectively upper and lower surfaces of the respectively upper and lower vertebrae. In a known manner, the surgeon measures the exact dimensions of the vertebrae, using a known measuring device. The measuring of the vertebrae, notably along the antero-posterior axis, informs the surgeon of the depth of the intervertebral space and allows the surgeon to determine the ideal dimensions of the prosthesis (P) in the horizontal plane and to calculate, as a function of the dimensions of the measured vertebrae and of the chosen prosthesis, the position of the point (C) on which the prosthesis (P) is to be centered. By taking a radiograph of the vertebra in which the pin (2) was implanted, for example using a known image intensifier, the surgeon can also control the proper positioning of the point (21) of the pin in the vertebra, for example its alignment on the median sagittal axis. The pins (2) are short and comprise, for example, small diameter rods. The small dimensions of the pins allow the surgeon to possibly recommence the step of implanting the pin (2) into the vertebra if he considers that the position of the point (21) is unsatisfactory.


Once these measurements have been made, the surgeon has all the information necessary to choose the most appropriate guide (1) and prosthesis (P). According to the embodiment of the guide (1) chosen by the surgeon, the surgeon adjusts, according to the gathered measurements, the angle adjuster (12) to accurately target the point (C) on which the prosthesis (P) is to be centered in the intervertebral space.


The positioning of the guide (1) opposite the intervertebral space can be performed using a holder for the guide or without the use of such a holder. Among other embodiments of the invention, the surgeon can choose between separators (10) that slide in the grooves of the retainer (100) or separators (10) that rotate about their axes of rotation on shafts (100). For separators (10) that slide in the grooves of the retainer (100), the surgeon inserts separators (10) in the intervertebral space, removes the known wedge (bougie or spacer), and slides the guide (1) on the separators (10) to bring the guide (1) proximal to the vertebrae. For separators (10) that rotate about their axes of rotation on shafts (100), the surgeon inserts the separators (10) assembled on shafts (100), removes the known wedge (bougie or spacer), and drives the separators (10) into the intervertebral space until the guide is proximal with the vertebrae.


The surgeon may choose different embodiments of the angle adjuster (12) to more readily facilitate placement of the prosthesis (P) centered at point (C). According to the encumbrance of the surgeon's access to the vertebrae, the surgeon will choose one of the embodiments described below so as to insert the prosthesis along the antero-posterior sagittal axis or along an inclined axis.


In the embodiment of the instrument described above in which the angle adjuster (12) comprise a sighting device created by a back sight, and preferably in the case where the prosthesis can be implanted straight on and does not require an oblique insertion, the surgeon targets the point (C) by placing the sighting device in the median sagittal axis of the vertebrae marked by at least one pin (2) implanted in at least one vertebra. The back sight preferably has a suitable shape and dimension to co-operate with the pin (2), so as to allow the back sight to be placed against the pin and to slide the guide (1) along the pin, thereby ensuring suitable positioning of the guide in relation to the vertebrae. The surgeon inserts the prosthesis (P) it into the cage of the guide (1) though the cage's open posterior face. A holder for the prosthesis can be used that allows, as mentioned above, insertion of the prosthesis (P) into the cage of the guide while the holder for the guide is still in its place and holding the guide in contact with the vertebrae. The impactor (4) allows the surgeon to implant the prosthesis between the vertebrae by pushing on the handle (45) of the impactor (4) or by hitting, for example with a hammer, on this handle (45). The adjustable position of the stop (41) on the shaft (40) of the impactor (4) will have already been set according to the distance of point (C) on which the prosthesis is to be centred between the vertebrae, in relation to the anterior face of the vertebrae. The adjusting of the position of the stop naturally takes into account the size of the pusher (42) of the impactor (4) and the diameter of the prosthesis (P).


According to the vertebrae (Vi, Vs) between which the prosthesis (P) is to be implanted, implanting of the prosthesis (P) along the antero-posterior sagittal axis may not necessarily be the easiest or least risky solution. For example, the vena cava and the aorta, which are major life-supporting blood vessels, pass in front of the lumbar vertebrae and considerably encumber the access to the anterior face of such vertebrae. The surgeon may therefore prefer to implant the intervertebral disc prosthesis (P) along an oblique axis of insertion, such as an antero-lateral axis in the case of access to the vertebrae from the anterior face. Some of the embodiments of the invention facilitate insertion of the prosthesis (P) obliquely, for example, by use of an angle adjuster (12) to set an angle (A1) between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis and the antero-posterior reference axis (S).


The small diameter pins (2) can be implanted in the median sagittal plane of the vertebrae without having to shift to any great extent the tissue and/or the organs passing over the anterior face of the vertebrae. The angle (A1) created between the insertion axis (X) of the prosthesis and the antero-posterior reference axis (S), as well as the magnitude of the offset of the guide (1) on one side of the vertebrae, will already have been determined according to the encumbrances to access to the vertebrae (Vi, Vs), the size of the vertebrae (Vi, Vs), and the size of the prosthesis (P). Thus, adjusting the angle (A1) and the offset of guide (1) from the antero-posterior reference axis (S) permits the intersection the axis of insertion (X) and of the antero-posterior reference axis (S) to coincide with the point (C) on which the prosthesis is to be centred.


Offset adjuster (120) can be used to establish the offset of guide (1) from the antero-posterior reference axis (S), for example, by screwing to a greater or lesser degree a threaded end of offset adjuster (120) into a threaded hole made in the angle adjuster (12). As mentioned above, adjustment of the length of the offset adjuster (120) can be performed before or after the connector (22) is placed on the pin (2), depending on the chosen embodiment. The sliding of the connector (22) over the pin (2) allows the guide (1) to be brought proximal to the vertebrae, with its anterior face opposite the intervertebral space. Other steps for implanting can be identical to those previously described, for example by using the impactor (4) of which the position of the stop (41) on the shaft (40) of the impactor (4) will already have been set according to the distance of the point (C) in relation to the anterior face of the vertebrae and according to the size of the prosthesis (P).


If the prosthesis comprises osteal anchors (51) fixed to the surfaces of the prosthesis (P), the chisel (3) is used to make notches in the vertebrae of shape and dimension complementary with the shape and dimension of the osteal anchors (51). The handle (35) of the chisel (3) can be used to push, or perhaps use strikes of a hammer, and pull the chisel (3) to make such notches. As mentioned above, the shape and dimension of the different embodiments of the chisel (3) are adapted to the type of prosthesis (P) to be implanted and to the type of osteal anchors (51). After preparing the intervertebral space with the chisel (3), the surgeon removes the chisel (3) from the inside of the guide (1) and removes the fragments of bone generated by making the notches. The prosthesis is implanted between the vertebrae using the impactor (4).


Once the prosthesis has been properly placed in the intervertebral space, the surgeon removes the guide (1), the separators (10) and the pin(s) (2).


Although the present invention has been described in detail, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many embodiments taking a variety of specific forms and reflecting changes, substitutions and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the described embodiments illustrate but do not restrict the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. Instrumentation for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis into an intervertebral space between an upper vertebra and a lower vertebra, the instrumentation comprising: a guide comprising at least one retainer,a cage defining an insertion axis for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and having open posterior and anterior faces, andan angle adjuster adapted to position the guide opposite the intervertebral space and to adjust an angle formed by the insertion axis and an antero-posterior reference axis, the angle adjuster including an adjustment gauge to visually indicate at least the angle formed by the insertion axis and an antero-posterior reference axis.
  • 2. Instrumentation of claim 1 in which the angle adjuster comprises at least one sighting device configured for visual adjustment of the angle between the insertion axis and the antero-posterior reference axis.
  • 3. Instrumentation of claim 1 in which the angle adjuster comprises a sighting device configured for operation with at least one pin implanted into at least one of the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra and approximately oriented with the antero-posterior reference axis of said vertebra to align said sighting device with the antero-posterior reference axis.
  • 4. Instrumentation of claim 1 further comprising: at least one pin for implantation into at least one of the upper vertebra and the lower vertebra in approximate orientation with the antero-posterior reference axis of said vertebra; andat least one offset adjuster adjustably linking the angle adjuster to the at least one pin.
  • 5. Instrumentation of claim 4 further comprising: at least one contact adjuster disposed approximately parallel to the insertion axis;a coupling between the at least one contact adjuster and the angle adjuster allowing movement of the angle adjuster with respect to the at least one contact adjuster; anda connector configured to move along the longitudinal axis of the pin and to connect the at least one offset adjuster to the at least one pin.
  • 6. Instrumentation of claim 5 in which the at least one pin comprises a sharp point.
  • 7. Method for implanting an intervertebral disc prosthesis into an intervertebral space between two vertebrae comprising the steps of: acquiring instrumentation comprising at least one pin, a guide, a cage defining an insertion axis for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and having open posterior and anterior faces, and an angle adjuster;implanting at least one pin in at least one of the two vertebrae, along an antero-posterior reference axis;measuring the dimensions of the intervertebral space;choosing the intervertebral disc prosthesis to be implanted;choosing the guide to be used;adjusting the angle adjuster based on the antero-posterior reference axis, on the dimensions of the intervertebral space and on the obstacles to access to the intervertebral space, in order to set a desired angle between the insertion axis for the intervertebral disc prosthesis and the antero-posterior reference axis;positioning the guide adjacent to the intervertebral space at the desired angle;inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide through the open posterior face of the cage; andinserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space through the open anterior face of the cage.
  • 8. Method for implanting of claim 7 further comprising a step of adjusting an offset adjuster for setting a lateral offset of the guide relative to the antero-posterior reference axis.
  • 9. Method for implanting of claim 7 in which the step of inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space is performed using an impactor comprising a shaft and an adjustable stop, said step further comprising adjustment of the stop and the application of a thrust to the impactor.
  • 10. Method for implanting of claim 7 in which the step of adjusting the angle adjuster is performed using a sighting device for aligning the guide with the antero-posterior reference axis, said step further comprising placement of the sighting device in contact with the at least one pin.
  • 11. Method for implanting of claim 7 further comprising a step of adjusting an offset adjuster of adjustable length connecting the angle adjuster of the guide to a connector connected to the pin, this adjusting step being implemented thanks to the measurements of the intervertebral space.
  • 12. Method for implanting of claim 11 further comprising a step of removing the guide, the one or more separators, and the at least one pin after the step of inserting the intervertebral disc intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space.
  • 13. Method for implanting set forth in claim 7 in which the step of positioning the guide adjacent to the intervertebral space further comprises translation of the guide along an axis substantially parallel to the antero-posterior reference axis until the guide is proximal to the vertebrae.
  • 14. Method for implanting of claim 7 further comprising the insertion of one or more separators into the intervertebral space.
  • 15. Method for implanting of claim 14 further comprising the engagement of at least one of the one or more separators with at least one retainer of the guide.
  • 16. Method for implanting of claim 7 in which the step of positioning the guide is performed with a holder for the guide.
  • 17. Method for implanting of claim 7 in which the step of inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide is performed with a holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis, the guide comprising a recess providing clearance sufficient for the holder for the intervertebral disc prosthesis to position the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the guide.
  • 18. Method for implanting of claim 7 in which the step of positioning the guide is performed with a holder for the guide configured to engage at least two notches of the guide to provide clearance for tools for accessing the intervertebral space.
  • 19. Method for implanting of claim 7 further comprising, before inserting the intervertebral disc prosthesis into the intervertebral space, the step of preparing the intervertebral space using a chisel having at least one blade, an adjustable stop and suitable shape and dimension for engagement with the guide and for cutting at least one notch in at least one vertebra.
  • 20. Method for implanting of claim 19 further comprising the step of clearing the intervertebral space of the bone debris generated by cutting the notch.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
05 06652 Jun 2005 FR national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/892,933, filed May 13, 2013, and issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 9,248,025 on Feb. 2, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/435,955, filed May 5, 2009, and issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 8,439,931 on May 14, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/180,868, filed Jul. 13, 2005, and issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 7,632,282 on Dec. 15, 2009, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 to French Patent Application No. 05 06652, filed in FRANCE on Jun. 29, 2005.

US Referenced Citations (422)
Number Name Date Kind
1436573 Choppinet et al. Nov 1922 A
2836442 Moskovitz May 1958 A
3325197 Wehner Jun 1967 A
3486505 Morrison Dec 1969 A
3857642 Miller Dec 1974 A
3958278 Lee et al. May 1976 A
4074542 Hankosky et al. Feb 1978 A
4085466 Goodfellow et al. Apr 1978 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4655778 Koeneman Apr 1987 A
4714469 Kenna Dec 1987 A
4756711 Mai et al. Jul 1988 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4787908 Wyss et al. Nov 1988 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4874389 Downey Oct 1989 A
4892545 Day et al. Jan 1990 A
4911718 Lee et al. Mar 1990 A
4932975 Main et al. Jun 1990 A
4946378 Hirayama et al. Aug 1990 A
4955908 Frey et al. Sep 1990 A
4955916 Carignan et al. Sep 1990 A
4997432 Keller Mar 1991 A
5002576 Fuhrmann et al. Mar 1991 A
5041139 Branemark Aug 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Arthur D Dec 1991 A
5122130 Keller Jun 1992 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5171281 Parsons et al. Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5197986 Mikhail Mar 1993 A
5246458 Graham Sep 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5290312 Kojimoto Mar 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5314477 Marnay May 1994 A
5358526 Tornier Oct 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5397364 Kozak et al. Mar 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5425773 Boyd et al. Jun 1995 A
5507816 Bullivant Apr 1996 A
5534029 Shima Jul 1996 A
5534030 Navarro et al. Jul 1996 A
566360 White Aug 1996 A
5545229 Parsons et al. Aug 1996 A
5556431 Buttner-Janz Sep 1996 A
5562738 Boyd et al. Oct 1996 A
5571109 Bertagnoli Nov 1996 A
5609636 Kohrs et al. Mar 1997 A
5645596 Kim et al. Jul 1997 A
5674294 Bainville et al. Oct 1997 A
5676701 Yuan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676702 Ratron Oct 1997 A
5683465 Shinn et al. Nov 1997 A
5702450 Bisserie Dec 1997 A
5702472 Huebner Dec 1997 A
5722977 Wilhelmy Mar 1998 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5776199 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5782832 Larsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5782919 Zdeblick et al. Jul 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5824094 Serhan et al. Oct 1998 A
5827328 Buttermann Dec 1998 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5888224 Beckers et al. Mar 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5893889 Harrington Apr 1999 A
5895428 Berry Apr 1999 A
5899941 Nishijima et al. May 1999 A
5984967 Zdeblick et al. Nov 1999 A
6001130 Bryan et al. Dec 1999 A
6010502 Bagby Jan 2000 A
6033438 Bianchi et al. Mar 2000 A
6039763 Shelokov Mar 2000 A
6045552 Zucherman et al. Apr 2000 A
6063088 Winslow May 2000 A
6063121 Xavier et al. May 2000 A
6080158 Lin Jun 2000 A
6093205 McLeod et al. Jul 2000 A
6096038 Michelson Aug 2000 A
6096080 Nicholson et al. Aug 2000 A
6113637 Gill et al. Sep 2000 A
6113638 Williams et al. Sep 2000 A
6136031 Middleton Oct 2000 A
6146421 Gordon et al. Nov 2000 A
6146422 Lawson Nov 2000 A
6149650 Michelson Nov 2000 A
6156067 Bryan et al. Dec 2000 A
6179873 Zientek Jan 2001 B1
6179874 Cauthen Jan 2001 B1
6193757 Foley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206922 Zdeblick et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210412 Michelson Apr 2001 B1
6221077 Rinner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224595 Michelson May 2001 B1
6224607 Michelson May 2001 B1
6228118 Gordon May 2001 B1
6231609 Mehdizadeh May 2001 B1
6245072 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258094 Nicholson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261293 Nicholson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264656 Michelson Jul 2001 B1
6267763 Castro Jul 2001 B1
6270498 Michelson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277149 Boyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283998 Eaton Sep 2001 B1
6296664 Middleton Oct 2001 B1
6306170 Ray Oct 2001 B2
6315797 Middleton Nov 2001 B1
6319257 Carignan et al. Nov 2001 B1
6344057 Rabbe et al. Feb 2002 B1
6364880 Michelson Apr 2002 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371988 Pafford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375655 Zdeblick et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387130 Stone et al. May 2002 B1
6395035 Bresina et al. May 2002 B2
6402750 Atkinson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402785 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409765 Bianchi et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413278 Marchosky Jul 2002 B1
6416551 Keller Jul 2002 B1
6419704 Ferree Jul 2002 B1
6419706 Graf Jul 2002 B1
6423095 Van Hoeck et al. Jul 2002 B1
6440168 Cauthen Aug 2002 B1
6447512 Landry et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447546 Bramlet et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447547 Michelson Sep 2002 B1
6468310 Ralph et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471724 Zdeblick et al. Oct 2002 B2
6478800 Fraser et al. Nov 2002 B1
6478823 Michelson Nov 2002 B1
6482234 Weber et al. Nov 2002 B1
6506216 McCue et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514260 Zdeblick et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517580 Ramadan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6520967 Cauthen Feb 2003 B1
6520996 Manasas et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524312 Landry et al. Feb 2003 B2
6527804 Gauchet et al. Mar 2003 B1
6527806 Ralph et al. Mar 2003 B2
6540785 Gill et al. Apr 2003 B1
6572653 Simonson Jun 2003 B1
6579291 Keith et al. Jun 2003 B1
6579320 Gauchet et al. Jun 2003 B1
6582468 Gauchet Jun 2003 B1
6592624 Fraser et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599294 Fuss et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599320 Kuslich Jul 2003 B1
6607558 Kuras Aug 2003 B2
6610089 Liu et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610092 Ralph et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610093 Pisharodi Aug 2003 B1
6613091 Zdeblick et al. Sep 2003 B1
6616671 Landry et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641614 Wagner et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645206 Zdeblick et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645249 Ralph et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652533 O'Neil Nov 2003 B2
6652586 Hunter et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656224 Middleton Dec 2003 B2
6669730 Ralph et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669731 Ralph et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669732 Serhan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673113 Ralph et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679915 Cauthen Jan 2004 B1
6682562 Viart et al. Jan 2004 B2
6695851 Zdeblick et al. Feb 2004 B2
6695882 Bianchi et al. Feb 2004 B2
6706068 Ferree Mar 2004 B2
6709439 Rogers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719794 Gerber et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723127 Ralph et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726720 Ross et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730088 Yeh May 2004 B2
6733504 Lin et al. May 2004 B2
6733532 Gauchet et al. May 2004 B1
6733535 Michelson May 2004 B2
6736850 Davis May 2004 B2
6740117 Ralph et al. May 2004 B2
6740118 Eisermann et al. May 2004 B2
6749635 Bryan Jun 2004 B1
6752832 Neumann Jun 2004 B2
6755841 Fraser et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764512 Keller Jul 2004 B2
6764515 Ralph et al. Jul 2004 B2
6767367 Michelson Jul 2004 B1
6770074 Michelson Aug 2004 B2
6770095 Grinberg et al. Aug 2004 B2
6793678 Hawkins Sep 2004 B2
6800093 Nicholson et al. Oct 2004 B2
6814737 Cauthen Nov 2004 B2
6824565 Muhanna et al. Nov 2004 B2
6899735 Coates et al. May 2005 B2
6936071 Marnay et al. Aug 2005 B1
6964686 Gordon Nov 2005 B2
6966929 Mitchell Nov 2005 B2
6984245 McGahan et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986789 Schultz et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994727 Khandkar et al. Feb 2006 B2
7001432 Keller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7011684 Eckman Mar 2006 B2
7025787 Bryan et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037340 Gau May 2006 B2
7056344 Huppert et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060097 Fraser et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060099 Carli et al. Jun 2006 B2
7105023 Eckman Sep 2006 B2
7105024 Richelsoph Sep 2006 B2
7118580 Beyersdorff et al. Oct 2006 B1
7153325 Kim et al. Dec 2006 B2
7169153 Keller Jan 2007 B2
7175662 Link et al. Feb 2007 B2
7198644 Schultz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7204851 Trieu et al. Apr 2007 B2
7204852 Marnay et al. Apr 2007 B2
7291170 Huppert Nov 2007 B2
7326250 Beaurain et al. Feb 2008 B2
7419505 Fleischmann et al. Sep 2008 B2
7494508 Zeegers Feb 2009 B2
7507248 Beaurain et al. Mar 2009 B2
7594931 Louis et al. Sep 2009 B2
7632282 Dinville Dec 2009 B2
7682396 Beaurain et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695516 Zeegers Apr 2010 B2
7695518 Gau Apr 2010 B2
7842088 Rashbaum et al. Nov 2010 B2
8002835 Zeegers Aug 2011 B2
8147556 Louis et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162988 Delecrin et al. Apr 2012 B2
8221422 Mangione Jul 2012 B2
8221457 Delecrin et al. Jul 2012 B2
8241359 Davis et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257439 Zeegers Sep 2012 B2
8262700 Cho et al. Sep 2012 B2
8267999 Beaurain et al. Sep 2012 B2
8343219 Allain et al. Jan 2013 B2
8409288 Davis et al. Apr 2013 B2
8430915 Beaurain et al. Apr 2013 B2
8439931 Dinville May 2013 B2
8465546 Jodaitis et al. Jun 2013 B2
8617245 Brett Dec 2013 B2
8623087 Huppert Jan 2014 B2
8632591 Vila et al. Jan 2014 B2
8685100 Jodaitis et al. Apr 2014 B2
8753397 Beaurain et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771284 Rashbaum et al. Jul 2014 B2
8845691 Renaud et al. Sep 2014 B2
8858635 Hovorka et al. Oct 2014 B2
8920474 Delecrin et al. Dec 2014 B2
8932359 Brett Jan 2015 B2
8974497 Cho et al. Mar 2015 B2
8974532 Zeegers Mar 2015 B2
8979932 Rashbaum et al. Mar 2015 B2
9039774 Chataigner et al. May 2015 B2
9044337 Dinville et al. Jun 2015 B2
9044339 Zeegers Jun 2015 B2
9078765 Louis et al. Jul 2015 B2
9144505 Steib Sep 2015 B2
9248025 Dinville Feb 2016 B2
9265618 Rashbaum et al. Feb 2016 B2
9265619 Beaurain et al. Feb 2016 B2
9314232 Stark Apr 2016 B2
9333095 Beaurain et al. May 2016 B2
9402658 Dinville et al. Aug 2016 B2
9445915 Zeegers Sep 2016 B2
9463091 Brett Oct 2016 B2
9480572 Jodaitis et al. Nov 2016 B2
9526622 Vila et al. Dec 2016 B2
9532882 Huppert Jan 2017 B2
9549766 Delecrin et al. Jan 2017 B2
9597194 Rashbaum et al. Mar 2017 B2
9597198 Davis et al. Mar 2017 B2
9655739 Hovorka et al. May 2017 B2
9713535 Davis et al. Jul 2017 B2
9730733 Cho et al. Aug 2017 B2
9763699 Beaurain et al. Sep 2017 B2
9795485 Allain et al. Oct 2017 B2
9833331 Dinville et al. Dec 2017 B2
9877842 Chataigner et al. Jan 2018 B2
9974661 Dinville et al. May 2018 B2
20010020185 Ray Sep 2001 A1
20020087212 James et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020143343 Castro Oct 2002 A1
20030028249 Baccelli et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030055503 O'Neil et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069586 Errico et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030109928 Pasquet et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030149438 Nichols et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171814 Muhanna et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187506 Ross et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195626 Huppert Oct 2003 A1
20030220691 Songer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040002758 Landry et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040002761 Rogers et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010316 William et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040030387 Landry et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034423 Lyons et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040073309 Bianchi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073311 Ferree Apr 2004 A1
20040083000 Keller et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093082 Ferree May 2004 A1
20040093083 Branch et al. May 2004 A1
20040102846 Keller et al. May 2004 A1
20040111160 Evans et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117022 Marnay et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133278 Marino et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040133281 Khandkar et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143332 Krueger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148029 Bianchi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162617 Zucherman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172020 Beaurain et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193273 Huang Sep 2004 A1
20040199254 Louis et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220582 Keller Nov 2004 A1
20040225295 Zubok et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225363 Richelsoph Nov 2004 A1
20040225364 Richelsoph et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040243238 Arnin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040243240 Beaurain et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254577 Delecrin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050010215 Delecrin et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015094 Keller Jan 2005 A1
20050021042 Marnay et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027359 Mashburn Feb 2005 A1
20050027363 Gordon Feb 2005 A1
20050033305 Schultz Feb 2005 A1
20050033437 Bao et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050033438 Schultz et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043798 Eckman Feb 2005 A1
20050043800 Paul et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043804 Gordon et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060034 Berry et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065611 Huppert et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071009 Muhanna et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085911 Link Apr 2005 A1
20050085917 Marnay et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050107788 Beaurain et al. May 2005 A1
20050113842 Bertagnoli et al. May 2005 A1
20050113926 Zucherman et al. May 2005 A1
20050119665 Keller Jun 2005 A1
20050131542 Benzel et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143824 Richelsoph et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149189 Mokhtar et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050159818 Blain Jul 2005 A1
20050165408 Puno et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165485 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050171610 Humphreys et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192671 Bao et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197705 Arnin et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197706 Hovorka et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216086 Marik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216092 Marik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228500 Kim et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234553 Gordon Oct 2005 A1
20050240273 Khandkar et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246024 Zeegers Nov 2005 A1
20050251260 Gerber et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256579 Keller et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267581 Marnay et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283242 Zucherman et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060015183 Gilbert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020341 Schneid et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030860 Peterman Feb 2006 A1
20060036326 Baumgartner et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041313 Allard et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041314 Millard Feb 2006 A1
20060069437 Weber Mar 2006 A1
20060069441 Zucherman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060111783 Aflatoon et al. May 2006 A1
20060116768 Krueger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060116769 Marnay et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060122703 Aebi et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136063 Zeegers Jun 2006 A1
20060142863 Fraser et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149273 Ross et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060149371 Marik et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060149378 Chase et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155377 Beaurain et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155378 Eckman Jul 2006 A1
20060173544 Gau Aug 2006 A1
20060178746 Bartish et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190082 Keller et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200241 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200242 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200243 Rothman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060212123 Lechmann et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235520 Pannu Oct 2006 A1
20060235526 Lemaire Oct 2006 A1
20060259143 Navarro et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265072 Richelsoph Nov 2006 A1
20060282074 Renaud et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287728 Mokhtar et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010887 Williams et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016217 Dinville Jan 2007 A1
20070016299 Eckman Jan 2007 A1
20070055378 Ankney et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073403 Lombardo et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073404 Rashbaum et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070088362 Bonutti et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100454 Burgess et al. May 2007 A1
20070100455 Parsons May 2007 A1
20070100456 Dooris et al. May 2007 A1
20070149974 Mangione Jun 2007 A1
20070162130 Rashbaum et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070270951 Davis et al. Nov 2007 A1
20090216241 Dinville Aug 2009 A1
20120116466 Dinville et al. May 2012 A1
20130041408 Dinville et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130253651 Dinville Sep 2013 A1
20140214168 Jodaitis et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140228885 Dinville et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150051702 Chataigner et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150080959 Renaud et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150320568 Ameil et al. Nov 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
2263842 Jul 1974 DE
2804936 Aug 1979 DE
3023353 Apr 1981 DE
8912648 Nov 1990 DE
20310432 Sep 2003 DE
20310433 Sep 2003 DE
102004027986 Jul 2005 DE
42271 Dec 1981 EP
176728 Apr 1986 EP
0298235 Jan 1989 EP
0317972 May 1989 EP
0333990 Sep 1989 EP
0356112 Feb 1990 EP
0512529 Nov 1992 EP
0560141 Sep 1993 EP
0566810 Oct 1993 EP
0566810 Aug 1996 EP
0738504 Oct 1996 EP
0747025 Dec 1996 EP
0852934 Jul 1998 EP
0903126 Mar 1999 EP
0955021 Nov 1999 EP
0978258 Feb 2000 EP
1222903 Jul 2002 EP
1250898 Oct 2002 EP
1344506 Sep 2003 EP
1344508 Sep 2003 EP
1374808 Dec 2005 EP
1915111 Apr 2008 EP
2124815 Sep 1972 FR
2372622 Jun 1978 FR
2659226 Sep 1991 FR
2716619 Sep 1995 FR
2718635 Oct 1995 FR
2723841 Mar 1996 FR
2724108 Mar 1996 FR
2730159 Aug 1996 FR
2737656 Feb 1997 FR
2632516 Dec 1999 FR
2787019 Jun 2000 FR
2787021 Jun 2000 FR
2824261 Nov 2002 FR
2831796 May 2003 FR
2843293 Feb 2004 FR
2846550 May 2004 FR
2865629 Aug 2005 FR
2865630 Aug 2005 FR
2869528 Nov 2005 FR
2261446 Oct 1990 JP
WO-9011740 Oct 1990 WO
WO-1991007931 Jun 1991 WO
WO-9113598 Sep 1991 WO
WO-9301771 Feb 1993 WO
WO-9404100 Mar 1994 WO
WO-9909914 Mar 1999 WO
WO-1999053871 Oct 1999 WO
WO-9956675 Nov 1999 WO
WO-1999065412 Dec 1999 WO
WO-1999066864 Dec 1999 WO
WO-0053127 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0074606 Dec 2000 WO
WO-0101893 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0119295 Mar 2001 WO
WO-2001041680 Jun 2001 WO
WO-2001062191 Aug 2001 WO
WO-2002071960 Sep 2002 WO
WO-02089701 Nov 2002 WO
WO-2003015646 Feb 2003 WO
WO-03039400 May 2003 WO
WO-2003045262 Jun 2003 WO
WO-03059212 Jul 2003 WO
WO-03075804 Sep 2003 WO
WO-2003075803 Sep 2003 WO
WO-2004039291 May 2004 WO
WO-2004041129 May 2004 WO
WO-2004041131 May 2004 WO
WO-2004071360 Aug 2004 WO
WO-2005046534 May 2005 WO
WO-05074839 Aug 2005 WO
WO-05104996 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2005117728 Dec 2005 WO
WO-2006136760 Dec 2006 WO
WO-2007000654 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2007000654 Jan 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (108)
Entry
“Applicants' Response filed Aug. 18, 2009 to USPTO OA of Feb. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/632,253”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,565, Amendment After Final filed Nov. 29, 2007”, 1 pg.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,565, Response filed Nov. 6, 2007 to Final Office Action dated May 7, 2007”, 37 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06779794.4, Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2009”, 1 pg.
“France Application Serial No. 0213833, Preliminary Search Report dated Jul. 10, 2003”, 2 pgs.
“France Application Serial No. 2730159, Preliminary Search Report dated Sep. 29, 1995”, 1 pg.
“France Application Serial No. 2824261, Preliminary Search Report dated Feb. 25, 2002”, 4 pgs.
“France Application Serial No. 2831796, Preliminary Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2002”, 2 pgs.
“France Application Serial No. 2865629, Preliminary Search Report dated Sep. 14, 2004”, 2 pgs.
“France Application Serial No. 2865630, Preliminary Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2005”, 2 pgs.
“France Application Serial No. 2869528, Preliminary Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2004”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2006/001781, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 19, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2006/001781, International Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2007”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2006/001781, Written Opinion dated Mar. 22, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“Request for Continued Examination in U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710; dated Jul. 11, 2013”, LDR Medical, by its attorneys; USPTO; Alexandria, Virgina, 3 pgs.
“USPTO OA of Feb. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/632,253”, 14 pgs.
Bouduk, N, et al., “A biological basis for instantaneous centres of rotation of the vertebral column”, Proc institution Mechanical Engineers, (Jun. 16, 1995), 177-183.
Gertzban, S D, et al., “Centrode Patterns and Segmental Instability in Degenerative Disc Disease”, BSc, M. Tile, MD, BSc, {Med), FRCS©, and B. Cruickshank, MD, FRCPath, Spine, vol. 10, No. 3 (Jan. 21, 1984), 257-261.
Griffith, S L, et al., “A Multicenter Retrospective Study of the Clinical Results of the LINK SB Charite Intervertebral Prosthesis”, vol. 19, No. 16, (Mar. 21, 1994), 1842-1849.
Haher, T R, et al., “Instantaneous Axis of Rotation as a Function of the Three Columns of the Spine”, MS, Spine, vol. 17, No. 6, (Jan. 09, 1992), S149-S154.
Haher, T R, et al., “The Effect of the Three Columns of the Spine on the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation in Flexion and Extension”, Spine, vol. 16, No. 8, (Apr. 16, 1991), S312-S318.
Klein, J A, et al., “Relocation of the Bending Axis During Flexion-Extension of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs and its Implications for Prolapse”, Spine, vol. 8, No. 6, (Nov. 18, 1982), 659-664.
Kostuik, J P, “Alternatives to Spinal Fusion”, vol. 29, No. 4, (Oct. 4, 1998), 701-715.
Liu, X, et al., “A New Technique for the Three-Dimensional Study of the Spine in Vitro and In Vivo by Using a Motion-Analysis System”, Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 10, No. 4, (Jan. 30, 1997), 329-338.
Pearcy, M J, et al., “Instantaneous Axes of Rotation of the Lumbar Intervertebral Joints”, vol. 13, No. 9, (Nov. 15, 1987), 1033-1041.
Seligman, S D, “Computer Analysis of Spinal Segment Motion in Degenerative Disc Disease With and Without Axial Loading”, Spine, vol. 9., No. 6, (Dec. 31, 1983), 566-573.
White Ill, A A, et al., “Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine”, 2nd Edition, J.B. Lippincott Co., (1990), 128-130.
Yoshioka, T, et al., “Motion Characteristics of the Normal Lumbar Spine in Young Adults: Instantaneous of Axis of Rotation and Vertebral Center Motion Analysis”, Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 3, No. 2, (1990), 103-113.
U.S. Appl. No 11/180,868, U.S. Pat. No 7.632,282, filed Jul. 13, 2005, Instrumentation and Methods for Insterting an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955, U.S. Pat. No. filed May 5, 2009, Instrumentation and Methods for Inserting an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, U.S. Pat. No. 9,248,025 filed May 13, 2013, Instrumentation and Methods for Inserting an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,565, Final Office Action dated May 7, 2007”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,565, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2006”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,565, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 29, 2007”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,565, Response filed Jan. 17, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2006 ”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846, Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2007”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846, Response filed Apr. 15, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846, Response filed Jun. 25, 2008 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 25, 2007”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,846, Response filed Oct. 16, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2007”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 15, 2013”, 27 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2010”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2009”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2013”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 11, 2014”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Response filed Jan. 20, 2011 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2011”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Response filed Apr. 26, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2009”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/051,710, Response filed Oct. 11, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2011”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2008”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2007”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Response filed Jan. 26, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2009”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Response filed Apr. 16, 2008 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Response filed Aug. 4, 2009 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2009”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/109,276, Response filed Aug. 6, 2007 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2007”, 39 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868, Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2008”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2009”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2009”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868, Response filed May 5, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2008”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,868, Response filed Jul. 21, 2008 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2008”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,007, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2009”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/676,237, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2009”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2012”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2014”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Response filed Apr. 9, 2012 to Non Final Office Action date Oct. 7, 2011”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Response filed May 6, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Response filed Aug. 19, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2014”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Response filed Dec. 20, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,677, Response filed Dec. 29, 2012 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2012”, 20 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955, Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2012”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2011”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 26, 2013”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955, Response filed Apr. 11, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2011”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,955, Response filed Dec. 24, 2012 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2012”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2014”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2015”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2015”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, Response filed Apr. 2, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2014”, 10 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,933, Response filed Dec. 29, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2014”, 11 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05702425.9, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 2, 2009”, 3 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05702425.9, Notice of Intention to Grant dated Oct. 22, 2010”, 35 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 05702425.9, Response filed Jul. 22, 2009 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 2, 2009”, 16 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06779794.4, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 10, 2010”, 6 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06779794.4, Notice of Intention to Grant dated Jan. 19, 2009”, 55 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06779794.4, Response filed Mat 11, 2009 to Notice of Intention to Grant dated Jan. 19, 2009”, 33 pgs.
“European Application Serial No. 06779794.4, Response filed May 19, 2011 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Nov. 10, 2010”, 21 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/162002/002998, International Preliminary Examination Report dated Dec. 22, 2003”, 8 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/162002/002998, International Search Report dated Sep. 16, 2003”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2002/004642, International Preliminary Examination Report dated Apr. 1, 2004”, 4 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2002/004642, International Search Report dated Jul. 2, 2003”, 2 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2003/004872, International Preliminary Examination Report dated Mar. 1, 2005”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2003/004872, International Search Report dated Mar. 3, 2004”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/162005/000280, International Search Report dated Jun. 24, 2005”, 5 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2005/001151, International Search Report dated Sep. 12, 2005”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/162005/00280, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 16, 2006”, 8 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/162005/00280, Written Opinion dated Jun. 24, 2005”, 8 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2006/01781, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 19, 2007”, 6 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2006/01781, International Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2007”, 3 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/1B2006/01781, Written Opinion dated Mar. 22, 2007”, 6 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160220389 A1 Aug 2016 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13892933 May 2013 US
Child 15012815 US
Parent 12435955 May 2009 US
Child 13892933 US
Parent 11180868 Jul 2005 US
Child 12435955 US