1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for use in oil and gas wellbores. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and apparatus for controlling the use of valves and other automated downhole tools through the use of instrumentation that can additionally be used as a relay to the surface. More particularly still, the invention relates to the use of deployment valves in wellbores in order to temporarily isolate an upper portion of the wellbore from a lower portion thereof.
2. Description of the Related Art
Oil and gas wells typically begin by drilling a borehole in the earth to some predetermined depth adjacent a hydrocarbon-bearing formation. After the borehole is drilled to a certain depth, steel tubing or casing is typically inserted in the borehole to form a wellbore and an annular area between the tubing and the earth is filed with cement. The tubing strengthens the borehole and the cement helps to isolate areas of the wellbore during hydrocarbon production.
Historically, wells are drilled in an “overbalanced” condition wherein the wellbore is filled with fluid or mud in order to prevent the inflow of hydrocarbons until the well is completed. The overbalanced condition prevents blow outs and keeps the well controlled. While drilling with weighted fluid provides a safe way to operate, there are disadvantages, like the expense of the mud and the damage to formations if the column of mud becomes so heavy that the mud enters the formations adjacent the wellbore. In order to avoid these problems and to encourage the inflow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore, underbalanced or near underbalanced drilling has become popular in certain instances. Underbalanced drilling involves the formation of a wellbore in a state wherein any wellbore fluid provides a pressure lower than the natural pressure of formation fluids. In these instances, the fluid is typically a gas, like nitrogen and its purpose is limited to carrying out drilling chips produced by a rotating drill bit. Since underbalanced well conditions can cause a blow out, they must be drilled through some type of pressure device like a rotating drilling head at the surface of the well to permit a tubular drill string to be rotated and lowered therethrough while retaining a pressure seal around the drill string. Even in overbalanced wells there is a need to prevent blow outs. In most every instance, wells are drilled through blow out preventers in case of a pressure surge.
As the formation and completion of an underbalanced or near underbalanced well continues, it is often necessary to insert a string of tools into the wellbore that cannot be inserted through a rotating drilling head or blow out preventer due to their shape and relatively large outer diameter. In these instances, a lubricator that consists of a tubular housing tall enough to hold the string of tools is installed in a vertical orientation at the top of a wellhead to provide a pressurizable temporary housing that avoids downhole pressures. By manipulating valves at the upper and lower end of the lubricator, the string of tools can be lowered into a live well while keeping the pressure within the well localized. Even a well in an overbalanced condition can benefit from the use of a lubricator when the string of tools will not fit though a blow out preventer. The use of lubricators is well known in the art and the forgoing method is more fully explained in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/536,937, filed Mar. 27, 2000, and that published application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
While lubricators are effective in controlling pressure, some strings of tools are too long for use with a lubricator. For example, the vertical distance from a rig floor to the rig draw works is typically about ninety feet or is limited to that length of tubular string that is typically inserted into the well. If a string of tools is longer than ninety feet, there is not room between the rig floor and the draw works to accommodate a lubricator. In these instances, a down hole deployment valve or DDV can be used to create a pressurized housing for the string of tools. Downhole deployment valves are well known in the art and one such valve is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,209,663, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Basically, a DDV is run into a well as part of a string of casing. The valve is initially in an open position with a flapper member in a position whereby the full bore of the casing is open to the flow of fluid and the passage of tubular strings and tools into and out of the wellbore. In the valve taught in the '663 patent, the valve includes an axially moveable sleeve that interferes with and retains the flapper in the open position. Additionally, a series of slots and pins permits the valve to be openable or closable with pressure but to then remain in that position without pressure continuously applied thereto. A control line runs from the DDV to the surface of the well and is typically hydraulically controlled. With the application of fluid pressure through the control line, the DDV can be made to close so that its flapper seats in a circular seat formed in the bore of the casing and blocks the flow of fluid through the casing. In this manner, a portion of the casing above the DDV is isolated from a lower portion of the casing below the DDV.
The DDV is used to install a string of tools in a wellbore as follows: When an operator wants to install the tool string, the DDV is closed via the control line by using hydraulic pressure to close the mechanical valve. Thereafter, with an upper portion of the wellbore isolated, a pressure in the upper portion is bled off to bring the pressure in the upper portion to a level approximately equal to one atmosphere. With the upper portion depressurized, the wellhead can be opened and the string of tools run into the upper portion from a surface of the well, typically on a string of tubulars. A rotating drilling head or other stripper like device is then sealed around the tubular string or movement through a blowout preventer can be re-established. In order to reopen the DDV, the upper portion of the wellbore must be repressurized in order to permit the downwardly opening flapper member to operate against the pressure therebelow. After the upper portion is pressurized to a predetermined level, the flapper can be opened and locked in place. Now the tool string is located in the pressurized wellbore.
Presently there is no instrumentation to know a pressure differential across the flapper when it is in the closed position. This information is vital for opening the flapper without applying excessive force. A rough estimate of pressure differential is obtained by calculating fluid pressure below the flapper from wellhead pressure and hydrostatic head of fluid above the flapper. Similarly when the hydraulic pressure is applied to the mandrel to move it one way or the other, there is no way to know the position of the mandrel at any time during that operation. Only when the mandrel reaches dead stop, its position is determined by rough measurement of the fluid emanating from the return line. This also indicates that the flapper is either fully opened or fully closed. The invention described here is intended to take out the uncertainty associated with the above measurements.
In addition to problems associated with the operation of DDVs, many prior art downhole measurement systems lack reliable data communication to and from control units located on a surface. For example, conventional measurement while drilling (MWD) tools utilize mud pulse, which works fine with incompressible drilling fluids such as a water-based or an oil-based mud, but they do not work when gasified fluids or gases are used in underbalanced drilling. An alternative to this is electromagnetic (EM) telemetry where communication between the MWD tool and the surface monitoring device is established via electromagnetic waves traveling through the formations surrounding the well. However, EM telemetry suffers from signal attenuation as it travels through layers of different types of formations. Any formation that produces more than minimal loss serves as an EM barrier. In particular salt domes tend to completely moderate the signal. Some of the techniques employed to alleviate this problem include running an electric wire inside the drill string from the EM tool up to a predetermined depth from where the signal can come to the surface via EM waves and placing multiple receivers and transmitters in the drill string to provide boost to the signal at frequent intervals. However, both of these techniques have their own problems and complexities. Currently, there is no available means to cost efficiently relay signals from a point within the well to the surface through a traditional control line.
Expandable Sand Screens (ESS) consist of a slotted steel tube, around which overlapping layers of filter membrane are attached. The membranes are protected with a pre-slotted steel shroud forming the outer wall. When deployed in the well, ESS looks like a three-layered pipe. Once it is situated in the well, it is expanded with a special tool to come in contact with the wellbore wall. The expander tool includes a body having at least two radially extending members, each of which has a roller that when coming into contact with an inner wall of the ESS, can expand the wall past its elastic limit. The expander tool operates with pressurized fluid delivered in a string of tubulars and is more completely disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,444 and that patent is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. In this manner ESS supports the wall against collapsing into the well, provides a large wellbore size for greater productivity, and allows free flow of hydrocarbons into the well while filtering out sand. The expansion tool contains rollers supported on pressure-actuated pistons. Fluid pressure in the tool determines how far the ESS is expanded. While too much expansion is bad for both the ESS and the well, too little expansion does not provide support to the wellbore wall. Therefore, monitoring and controlling fluid pressure in the expansion tool is very important. Presently fluid pressure is measured with a memory gage, which of course provides information after the job has been completed. A real time measurement is desirable so that fluid pressure can be adjusted during the operation of the tool if necessary.
There is a need therefore, for a downhole system of instrumentation and monitoring that can facilitate the operation of downhole tools. There is a further need for a system of instrumentation that can facilitate the operation of downhole deployment valves. There is yet a further need for downhole instrumentation apparatus and methods that include sensors to measure downhole conditions like pressure, temperature, and proximity in order to facilitate the efficient operation of the downhole tools. Finally, there exists a need for downhole instrumentation and circuitry to improve communication with existing expansion tools used with expandable sand screens and downhole measurement devices such as MWD and pressure while drilling (PWD) tools.
The present invention generally relates to methods and apparatus for instrumentation associated with a downhole deployment valve (DDV). In one aspect, a DDV in a casing string is closed in order to isolate an upper section of a wellbore from a lower section. Thereafter, a pressure differential above and below the closed valve is measured by downhole instrumentation to facilitate the opening of the valve. In another aspect, the instrumentation in the DDV includes different kinds of sensors placed in the DDV housing for measuring all important parameters for safe operation of the DDV, a circuitry for local processing of signal received from the sensors, and a transmitter for transmitting the data to a surface control unit.
In yet another aspect, the design of circuitry, selection of sensors, and data communication is not limited to use with and within downhole deployment valves. All aspects of downhole instrumentation can be varied and tailored for others applications such as improving communication between surface units and measurement while drilling (MWD) tools, pressure while drilling (PWD) tools, and expandable sand screens (ESS).
Also shown schematically in
Prior to opening the DDV 110, fluid pressures in the upper portion 130 and the lower portion 120 of the wellbore 100 at the flapper 230 in the DDV 110 must be equalized or nearly equalized to effectively and safely open the flapper 230. Since the upper portion 130 is opened at the surface in order to insert the tool string 500, it will be at or near atmospheric pressure while the lower portion 120 will be at well pressure. Using means well known in the art, air or fluid in the top portion 130 is pressurized mechanically to a level at or near the level of the lower portion 120. Based on data obtained from sensors 128 and 129 and the SMCU 800, the pressure conditions and differentials in the upper portion 130 and lower portion 120 of the wellbore 100 can be accurately equalized prior to opening the DDV 110.
While the instrumentation such as sensors, receivers, and circuits is shown as an integral part of the housing 112 of the DDV 110 (See
The figure shows the wellbore having the DDV 110 disposed therein with the electronics necessary to operate the sensors discussed above (see
Still another use of the apparatus and methods of the present invention relate to the use of an expandable sand screen or ESS and real time measurement of pressure required for expanding the ESS. Using the apparatus and methods of the current invention with sensors incorporated in an expansion tool and data transmitted to a SMCU (see
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2290406 | Crites | Jul 1942 | A |
3362487 | Lindsey | Jan 1968 | A |
3517553 | Williams et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3552502 | Wilson, Sr. | Jan 1971 | A |
3831138 | Rammner | Aug 1974 | A |
3986350 | Schmidt | Oct 1976 | A |
4015234 | Krebs | Mar 1977 | A |
4160970 | Nicolson | Jul 1979 | A |
4247312 | Thakur et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4297880 | Berger | Nov 1981 | A |
4367794 | Bednar et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4440239 | Evans | Apr 1984 | A |
4553428 | Upchurch | Nov 1985 | A |
4630675 | Neipling et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4691203 | Rubin et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4775009 | Wittrisch et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5010966 | Stokley et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014781 | Smith | May 1991 | A |
5172717 | Boyle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5235285 | Clark et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5293551 | Perkins et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303773 | Czernichow et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5355952 | Meynier | Oct 1994 | A |
5358035 | Grudzinski | Oct 1994 | A |
5512889 | Fletcher | Apr 1996 | A |
5661402 | Chesnutt et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5730219 | Tubel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5857522 | Bradfield et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900137 | Homan | May 1999 | A |
5971072 | Huber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992519 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996687 | Pringle et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006828 | Kluth et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006832 | Tubel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018501 | Smith et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035952 | Bradfield et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041864 | Patel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6072567 | Sapack | Jun 2000 | A |
6075462 | Smith | Jun 2000 | A |
6095250 | Day et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6138774 | Bourgoyne, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173772 | Vaynshteyn | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176312 | Tubel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179052 | Purkis et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191586 | Bittar | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199629 | Shirk et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209663 | Hosie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234258 | Karigan | May 2001 | B1 |
6247536 | Leismer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269874 | Rawson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279660 | Hay | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283207 | Lemetayer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308137 | Underhill et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325146 | Ringgenberg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328118 | Karigan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343649 | Beck et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352129 | Best | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354147 | Gysling et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374925 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386288 | Snider et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6422084 | Fernald et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425444 | Metcalfe et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427776 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429784 | Beique et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457540 | Gardes | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478091 | Gano | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484816 | Koederitz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6575244 | Chang et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585041 | Crossley | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598675 | Bussear et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607042 | Hoyer et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6644110 | Spriggs et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668943 | Maus et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684950 | Patel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6755261 | Koederitz | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6814142 | Paulk et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851481 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6904981 | van Riet | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912177 | Smith | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920942 | Koederitz | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6951252 | Restarick et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966373 | Von Gynz-Rekowski | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7004448 | Suter et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044237 | Leuchtenberg | May 2006 | B2 |
7044239 | Pinckard et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20010048089 | Clark et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030150621 | Pia | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155131 | Vick, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030192695 | Dillenbeck et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040065446 | Tran et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139791 | Johansen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040178003 | Riet | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231889 | van Riet | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251032 | Luke et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050092523 | McCaskill et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115708 | Jabusch | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060011236 | Suter et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060065402 | Fontanan et al. | Mar 2006 | A9 |
20060086538 | van Riet | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124300 | Steiner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060207795 | Kinder et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 945 590 | Sep 1999 | EP |
2 154 632 | Sep 1985 | GB |
2 299 915 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2 330 598 | Apr 1999 | GB |
2 335 453 | Sep 1999 | GB |
2 360 532 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2 381 282 | Apr 2003 | GB |
2 394 242 | Apr 2004 | GB |
2 394 974 | May 2004 | GB |
2 400 125 | Oct 2004 | GB |
2 403 250 | Dec 2004 | GB |
WO 9850681 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 2004020774 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040084189 A1 | May 2004 | US |