This invention relates to surgical sizing instruments for creating appropriately sized tissue pockets prior to insertion of medical implants. In various embodiments, the invention also relates to instruments and tools that facilitate marking the tissue to aid proper positioning and alignment of the implant.
Most surgeries conducted to implant medical devices (such as, e.g., pacemakers) include a procedural step in which the surgeon fashions a “pocket” in the tissue in which the medical device is to be implanted. The implementation of this step varies by surgeon, resulting in varying sizes of the pockets created. While this variability is generally not an issue of great importance in a highly vascular region of the body that quickly heals, it can be problematic in delicate organs, such as, e.g., the eye. Medical eye implants include, for example, Ahmed glaucoma valves, which are used to drain aqueous humor out of the eye to treat certain types of glaucoma (an eye disease due, typically, to increased intraocular pressure, which generally results in damage to the optic nerve), and ophthalmic miniature drug-pump devices. Current procedures for insertion of such medical devices into the eye rely on the surgeon's skill to create an incision and insert the medical device without any prior sizing of the pocket. This process can lead to unwanted tearing of tissue and rupture of blood vessels, which may delay patient recovery, as well as to possible damage to the delicate external components of the medical device, which can compromise its functionality. Furthermore, without a properly sized pocket, it may be difficult to precisely place and anchor the medical device in the tissue. Accordingly, there is a need for instruments that facilitate forming an accurately shaped and sized pocket for medical-device implantation in the tissue and/or that aid in the proper positioning of an implant within the pocket.
The present invention provides surgical sizing and/or marking instruments that aid surgeons in the implantation of medical devices. In various embodiments, the surgical sizing instrument (“surgical sizer”) includes or consists of a replica of the actual medical device to be implanted (possibly scaled in size) that is fixedly attached to an ergonomic handle. A replica of a medical device, as defined herein, is a structure that is substantially similar in its exterior three-dimensional shape to the medical device. However, the replica may omit certain structural details, such as refill ports or minor surface structures, that do not significantly affect the shape of the exterior surface and/or whose omission is not clinically relevant to the body's ability to accommodate the actual implantable device in a pocket formed by the replica. Such replicas are considered “substantially similar in shape” to the implantable medical device. More generally, the term “substantially” or “approximately” means ±10%, and in some embodiments, ±5%.
In contrast to conventional sizers, which serve to measure the size of a tissue pocket or orifice by incrementally altering movable elements until they correspond to the dimensions of the pocket or orifice, a sizer in accordance herewith facilitates creating an appropriately sized pocket for the implantable medical device and simultaneously verifying insertion feasibility prior to actual insertion of the device. Since the medical-device replica is fixedly attached to the handle, the surgeon cannot lose the device, as might be the case if the surgeon were to size the pocket by using an introducer to grip the device.
In various embodiments, the surgical sizer also includes features or tools that provide the surgeon with the ability to accurately mark relevant anatomical landmarks during sizing. Alternatively, in some embodiments, surgical sizers and markers are provided as two separate instruments, each including a handle and, fixedly attached thereto, either a replica of the implant or a marking portion.
While surgical sizers/markers in accordance herewith can be used for many types of implants (e.g., drug pumps, pacemakers, other neural stimulators), embodiments of the invention can be particularly helpful in the insertion process of implants that are delicate in nature (e.g., microelectronic devices or infusion pumps with flexible cannulas) and/or require precise placement and markers for possible anchoring techniques. Accordingly, one area where the use of surgical sizers/markers in accordance herewith is particularly beneficial is that of ophthalmic surgery.
In one aspect, the present invention provides an instrument facilitating surgical implantation of an implantable device. The instrument includes a pocket-forming portion substantially shaped like the implantable device, and a grippable handle portion extending away from and joined to the pocket-forming portion. By “joined” is meant forming a unitary structure; accordingly, two separate structures permanently fixedly attached to form a single structure, or a single structure having distinct portions (e.g., pocket-forming and handle portions), are joined as that term is used herein. The pocket-forming portion may include a positively scaled (e.g., slightly larger) replica of the implantable device. Further, it may have a curvature that is complementary to an internal anatomical contour (e.g., an ocular orbit). The handle portion has a length adequate to facilitate external manual retention of the instrument with the pocket-forming portion disposed within an internal anatomical site.
In some embodiments, the instrument includes or consisting essentially of a polymer material and/or a metal (such as, e.g., stainless steel, titanium, niobium, nickel titanium, or an alloy). The material is preferably biocompatible. In some embodiments (particularly in embodiments of instruments intended for repeated use), an autoclave-safe metal is used. In other embodiments (particularly in embodiments of instruments intended for one-time use), an autoclave-degradable polymer is used. The surface of the instrument (or a surface portion) may be coated with parylene.
The handle portion is in some embodiments planar and in others non-planar. It may be joined to the pocket-forming portion in a planar fashion. At an end opposite the pocket-forming portion, the handle portion may include a cut-out that is anatomically compatible with a human thumb. The cut-out may be textured, and may form, e.g., a circle, a slot, or a hook shape.
In certain embodiments, the handle portion includes, in a distal portion thereof, one or more markings, such as, e.g., two circular indentations proximate a terminus of the pocket-forming portion, or a distance marking at 8 mm from the from a terminus of the pocket-forming portion and, optionally, distance markings at 3.5 mm and 4 mm from the distance marking at 8 mm. In some embodiments, the handle portion includes a slot proximate a terminus of the pocket-forming portion. The ends of the slot may be semicircular in shape. The instrument may further include a marking tool with a tip (e.g., a felt tip or a non-piercing protrusion) suspended above and sized to fit through the slot; the marking tool is configured to mark tissue when engaged.
In a further aspect, the invention provides an instrument facilitating marking tissue at an implantation site of an implantable device. The instrument includes a marking portion having one or more features for marking the tissue, and a handle portion joined to the marking portion (e.g., fixedly attached thereto or forming a single structure with the marking portion, as defined above). The handle portion may be planar or non-planar, have one or more textured regions, and/or include a cut-out at a proximal end, and may generally have features and characteristics like the handle of a surgical sizer as described above. In some embodiments, the marking portion is joined to the handle portion at an angle; in other embodiments, it is joined to the handle portion in a planar fashion. The marking portion may include a cut-out for alignment with an anatomical landmark. Further, it may have, at an underside, one or more non-piercing protrusions for marking tissue. The marking portion may also include distance markings, circular indentations, or a slot (and optionally, an integrated marking tool with a tip above the slot) as described above with respect to marking portions in a surgical sizer. The marking instrument may be fabricated from (preferably biocompatible) metals and/or polymers, and may be autoclave-safe or autoclave-degradable, depending on the intended use. The surface of the marking instrument (or a surface portion) may be coated with parylene.
In another aspect, the invention may be directed to a method of fabricating an instrument facilitating surgical implantation of an implantable device. The method includes fabricating a structure including a pocket-forming portion substantially shaped like the implantable device and, joined thereto, a handle portion from a metal and/or a polymer (e.g., by injection molding or stereolithography), depositing a first polymer layer on the structure, and then depositing a second polymer layer on an underside of the structure. The first polymer layer may be hydrophobic and, e.g., include or consist essentially of parylene, and the second polymer layer may include silicone. The method may further include using a cut-out, a slot, or an indentation formed in the structure to hold the structure during the deposition steps.
In yet another aspect, the invention may be directed to a method of fabricating an instrument facilitating marking tissue at an implantation site of an implantable device. The method includes fabricating a structure including a marking portion and a handle portion joined thereto from a metal and/or a polymer (e.g., by injection molding or stereolithography), depositing a first polymer (e.g., parylene or another hydrophobic polymer) layer on the structure, and then depositing a second polymer (e.g., silicone) on an underside of the structure. The method may further include using a cut-out, a slot, or an indentation formed in the structure to hold the structure during the deposition steps.
The foregoing will be more readily understood from the following detailed description, in particular, when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
The holding end of the handling portion 104 may have a cut-out (or groove) 108 anatomically compatible with a human thumb to provide the surgeon with a gripping surface and tactile feedback during surgery. This cut-out 108 may take the form of a circular hole, an elongated slot, or other shape (e.g., a hook-shape), and have a textured grip for additional feedback. The entire proximal portion of the tool can, optionally, be textured in order to allow the surgeon to grip the tool, while keeping the distal end relatively smooth, e.g., with a coating of silicone or parylene.
The surgical sizer 200 may have various marking features at which the surgeon may opt to mark the eye with a felt-tip marker, bovie, cauterizing tool, or other comparable marking tool to identify certain locations proximate the anatomic location where an implant should be placed. For example, as shown in
The sizer 200 shown in
The preferred implantation position of ophthalmic drug pumps as shown in
In some embodiments, illustrated in
In some embodiments, pocket-sizing and marking functionalities are not integrated into the same device, but instead are provided by two separate surgical instruments, each including a handle portion and, fixedly attached to the handle, the replica or marking portion.
The handle portion 504 of the marking instrument 500 may be rod-shaped and, optionally, include a textured gripping area 514, as shown in
Surgical sizers and markers as described herein may be constructed using injection molding, machining, stereolithography, or other 3D manufacturing procedures known to persons of skill in the art. The construction of the surgical instrument may be straightforwardly adapted to its intended application and use. For example, a surgical sizer or marker intended for repeated use may be made of an autoclave-compatible material (i.e., a material that withstands the high-pressure, high-temperature steam used in an autoclave to sterilize the tool), such as metal (e.g., stainless steel, titanium, niobium, nickel titanium (“nitinol”), or an alloy of comparable properties) or certain polymer materials (e.g., polyether ether ketone or polypropylene). On the other hand, an instrument intended for one-time use may be manufactured from a disposable polymer material, preferably one that degrades during autoclaving to ensure that the instrument is not used more than once (such as, e.g., caprolactone, lactic acid, glycolic acid, acrylic, polycarbonate, or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene). In various embodiments, the surgical sizer, or its surface, is made of a biocompatible material, such as a biocompatibel metal (e.g., titanium or titanium alloys, colbalt-chrome alloys, molybdenum or molybdenum alloys, nitonol (a titanium-nickel alloy), certain types of stainless steel, gold, platinum, nickel alloys, or alumina ceramics) or polymer (e.g., polyether ether ketone, polypropylene, urethane, teflon, polyethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, certain epoxies, silicone, or parylene).
The external surfaces of the surgical sizer or marker are preferably non-abrasive and/or finished with smooth edges in order to prevent damage to the surrounding tissues contacted during implantation. In some embodiments, the surgical instrument is surface-coated with parylene or a comparable hydrophobic material for an optimized smooth surface; surface coatings may be applied to both metal and disposable plastic tools. In one preferred embodiment, the instrument is injected-molded out of polymer (SOMOS 11122) and then coated with Parylene C. Additionally, the underside of the instrument may be dipped in silicone or other materials commonly used by those skilled in the field to further optimize the surface. During the coating procedure, the groove, holes, or indentations in the distal portion of the handle or the marking portion may be used to hold the instrument so as to minimize the surface area that is not coated with conventional coating procedures.
The terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms and expressions of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof. In addition, having described certain embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts disclosed herein may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular, embodiments of the invention need not include all of the features nor have all of the advantages described herein. Rather, they may possess any subset or combination of features and advantages. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/646,124, filed on Oct. 5, 2012, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/543,519, filed on Oct. 5, 2011, the entire disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1433340 | Samuel et al. | Oct 1922 | A |
1561116 | Silliman et al. | Nov 1925 | A |
2555076 | Crossley et al. | May 1951 | A |
4036230 | Waldock | Jul 1977 | A |
4375218 | DiGeronimo | Mar 1983 | A |
4406285 | Villasenor et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4705035 | Givens | Nov 1987 | A |
4739761 | Grandon | Apr 1988 | A |
4844065 | Faulkner | Jul 1989 | A |
D304078 | Jensen | Oct 1989 | S |
4880017 | Soll | Nov 1989 | A |
4917677 | McCarthy | Apr 1990 | A |
5006123 | Soil | Apr 1991 | A |
5007913 | Dulebohn | Apr 1991 | A |
5021057 | Byrne | Jun 1991 | A |
5484447 | Waldock et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5697945 | Kritzinger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5752967 | Kritzinger et al. | May 1998 | A |
5797954 | Shaffer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5893853 | Arnold | Apr 1999 | A |
6113606 | Dykes | Sep 2000 | A |
6171324 | Cote et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D439976 | Cote | Apr 2001 | S |
6248123 | McDonald | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251090 | Avery | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280449 | Blake | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6447528 | Paraschac | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6554829 | Schulze | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6786926 | Peyman | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7160297 | Nesbitt | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7972348 | Anderson | Jul 2011 | B1 |
20020133168 | Smedley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050125013 | Kessler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203554 | Dykes | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060258994 | Avery | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080081952 | Josephberg | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080255578 | Neusidl | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100057094 | Akahoshi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106202 | Gannoe et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137780 | Singh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100331770 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110112546 | Juan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
554239 | Sep 1974 | CH |
10693 | May 1980 | EP |
2906997 | Apr 2008 | FR |
29129011 | Aug 2008 | FR |
1005694 | Oct 1998 | NL |
9636377 | Nov 1996 | WO |
1999030656 | Jun 1999 | WO |
2008085966 | Jul 2008 | WO |
20100031691 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2001087200 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT2012058944 dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT2012021540 dated Jun. 28, 2012 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180289442 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61543519 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13646124 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 15951800 | US |