The present invention provides a panel with improved insulating characteristics and an improved method for making an insulated panel.
Various methods have been used to produce foam filled wood stud walls. One particular method, developed by the Assignee of the present invention, is particularly suited to prefabricated walls and is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,273,693. In that method, a half completed stud wall is introduced into an apparatus comprising a backplate and a moveable dam having a removable sheet and a compressible membrane. The exterior sheathing of the stud wall is placed against the backplate. The stud wall is backed with any suitable exterior sheathing, such as asphalt-impregnated fiber board. The removable sheet is draped over the interior of the stud wall. The compressible membrane is placed over the removable sheet and the moveable dam urges the backplate, stud wall, removable sheet and compressible membrane together. The compressible membrane forms a seal between the dam and the studs and is urged into the wall cavity reducing the volume of the cavity.
A foam or foam-forming mixture is introduced between the sheathing and the moveable dam having the removable sheet and the compressible membrane, which is temporarily positioned against the interior side of the studs. The foam or foam-forming mixture is introduced by a “spray-pour” method. In this type of method, a spray-type urethane foam is injected between the exterior sheathing and the dam using an atomizing spray nozzle having a tube to direct the trajectory of the spray. The foam is then permitted to rise freely between the sheathing and the dam and is allowed to set.
After allowing sufficient setting time to elapse, the dam is moved to the next upper unfilled section of the stud wall while the removable sheet and the compressible membrane are unrolled in advance of the moveable dam and the next bath of foam or foam-forming mixture is introduced into the wall. The wall can therefore be filled in a series of spray-pours.
This method produced a foam insulated wall panel with excellent thermal performance and a uniform planar finish on the interior surface. However, the application of urethane foam is a highly exothermic process and during the curing phase these panels are sometimes subject to some distortion.
In one embodiment, the insulated panel comprises exterior sheathing, studs, rigid foam panels and spray/pour foam that is cured in place. The rigid foam panels are placed up against the sheathing between the studs, and the spray/pour foam is used to fill in the void.
In another embodiment, the rigid foam panels have beveled sides and second rigid foam panels are placed over the rigid foam panels. The rigid foam panels are placed up against the sheathing between the studs, with the second rigid foam panels placed up against the rigid foam panels. The spray/pour foam is used to fill in the void between the rigid foam panels. The beveled sides of the rigid foam panels aid in placing the rigid foam panels, prevent the spray/pour foam from penetrating and expanding behind the rigid foam panels and pushing them outwards and help in allowing the rigid foam panels to be fitted around electrical boxes and other such elements.
In another embodiment, the rigid foam panels are without beveled sides, but instead are placed by guides or spacers, and held in place by the adhesive. The spray/pour foam is used to fill in the void between the rigid foam panels and the sheathing. Lack of beveled sides ease manufacturing of the rigid foam panels and allow the rigid foam panels to be cut to fit a cavity, while still allowing the rigid foam panels to be fitted around electrical boxes and other such elements.
Between the studs 14, rigid foam panels 16 are secured to the exterior sheathing 12 and/or the studs 14. Preferably, the rigid foam panels 16 occupy more than half the width of the studs 14. For example, for nominal 2×4 studs 14, the rigid foam panels 16 could be at least two inches thick. The rigid foam panel 16 may be Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) or extruded polystyrene; however other materials may be used.
The remaining space between the studs 14 is then filled with uncured spray-pour foam 18 such as spray-pour polyurethane foam. The uncured foam is then cured in place. For example, the remainder of the void can be filled with the spray-pour foam 18 in a series of spray-pours, as performed in the previous method described above and as described in more detail U.S. Pat. No. 5,273,693, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Other methods for filling the void with foam could also be used. Note that the foam 18 is not filled all the way to the inner edge of the studs 14. The rigid foam panels 16 may be restrained or pressed against the sheathing 12 while the spray-pour foam 18 is filled and until it is at least substantially cured.
With this technique, the panel 10 is easier to manufacture and is less subject to distortion caused by the curing of the foam. The rigid foam panels 16 displace sufficient foam 18 to eliminate distortion on the sheathing 12, while the layer of spray-pour foam 18 still provides an air-tight seal between the studs 14. This technique allows the mixing of different foam types in the spray-pour foam 18 to achieve different thermal resistance values for various target markets without modifying overall wall thickness. Walls 10 can also be cost-performance optimized for specific applications. Use of this technique reduces the required curing related dwell time of the panel 10 in the moveable dam thereby speeding the manufacturing process. Other features could be incorporated into the panel 10 through the design of special extruded rigid foam insulation to manage sound attenuation.
As an alternate technique, when using a homogenous foam 18, smaller loose pieces of cured foam could simultaneously be blown into the void with the sprayed-in foam 18 to adapt the process to various shapes and to reduce labor.
Between the studs 14, rigid foam panels 26 are secured to the exterior sheathing 12 and/or the studs 14. Preferably, the rigid foam panels 26 occupy more than half the width of the studs 14. For example, for nominal 2×4 studs 14, the rigid foam panels 26 could be at least two inches thick. The rigid foam panels 26 may be Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) or extruded polystyrene; however other materials may be used. The rigid foam panels 26 also have beveled sides adjacent the studs 14.
Second rigid foam panels 27 are then placed against the rigid foam panels 26. The second rigid foam panels 27 may be a polyurethane foam board; however other materials may be used.
The remaining space between the studs 14, rigid foam panels 26 and second rigid foam panels 27 is then filled with spray-pour foam 18, such as spray-pour polyurethane foam. For example, the remainder of the void can be filled with the spray-pour foam 18 by spraying the uncured spray-pour foam 18 into the void and letting the foam 18 cure in the void. Excess cured spray-pour foam 18 (for example, to the extent the cured foam 18 expands beyond the studs 14) is removed. Other methods for filling the void with foam could also be used. The rigid foam panels 14, 26 may be restrained or pressed against the sheathing 12 while the spray-pour foam 18 is filled and until it is at least substantially cured.
With this technique, the panel 20 is easier and less expensive to manufacture and is less subject to distortion caused by the curing of the foam. The rigid foam panels 26 displace sufficient foam 18 to eliminate distortion on the sheathing 12, while the spray-pour foam 18 still provides an air-tight seal between the studs 14. The beveled sides of the rigid foam panels 26 work as a guide in fitting the rigid foam panels 26 against the sheathing 12, as well as preventing the foam 18 from penetrating and expanding behind the rigid foam panels 26 and pushing them out of the cavity. The beveled sides of the rigid foam panels 26 also allow for the rigid foam panels 26 to be cut out and fit around electrical boxes or other such elements while still maintaining the desired airtight seal.
The rigid foam panels 26 can be less expensive and can have less insulating properties than the second rigid foam panels 27 and the spray-pour foam 18. This provides a well-insulated, cost-effective panel 20.
This technique also allows the mixing of different foam types in the spray-pour foam 18 to achieve different thermal resistance values for various target markets without modifying overall panel thickness. Panels 20 can also be cost-performance optimized for specific applications. Use of this technique reduces the required time for curing of the panel 20 thereby speeding the manufacturing process. Other features could be incorporated into the panel 20 through the design of special extruded rigid foam insulation to manage sound attenuation.
As an alternate technique, when using a homogenous foam 18, smaller loose pieces of cured foam could simultaneously be blown into the void with the sprayed-in foam 18 to adapt the process to various shapes and to reduce labor.
Adhesive 35 is applied to the interior surface of the exterior sheathing and/or the exterior surface of the rigid foam panels 36. Guides 33, or spacers, are placed adjacent the studs 14 to properly position the rigid foam panels 36 as they are placed against the sheathing 12. The rigid foam panels 36 may then be secured using the adhesive 35 to prevent them from moving out of place during assembly. Preferably, the rigid foam panels 36 occupy more than half the width of the studs 14. For example, for nominal 2×4 studs 14, the rigid foam panels 36 could be at least two inches thick. The rigid foam panels 36 may be Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) or extruded polystyrene; however other materials may be used.
Second rigid foam panels 37 are then placed against the rigid foam panels 36, again using the guides 33 (spacers) for proper position. The second rigid foam panels 37 may be a polyurethane foam board; however other materials may be used. The second rigid foam panels 37 may be secured to the rigid foam panels 36 by adhesive (not shown).
When the adhesive 35 has at least partially set and the rigid foam panels 36, 37 are secured in place, the guides 33 are removed. In the example the guides 33 are pictured as pieces of dimensional lumber sized to fit the application; while this represents one method for guiding into and keeping in place the rigid foam panels 36 during assembly, other methods may be used.
As shown in
With this technique, the panel 30 is easier and less expensive to manufacture and is less subject to distortion caused by the curing of the foam. The rigid foam panels 36 displace sufficient foam 18 to eliminate distortion on the sheathing 12, while the spray-pour foam 18 still provides an air-tight seal between the studs 14. The second rigid foam panels 37 increase the insulating properties of the panel 30. The rigid foam panels 36 are without beveled sides, which further eases manufacture. The rigid foam panels 36 can quickly be cut to size and fitted to a particular cavity. The rigid foam panels 36 can still be fitted around electrical boxes or other such elements.
This technique also allows the mixing of different foam types in the spray-pour foam 18 to achieve different thermal resistance values for various target markets without modifying overall panel thickness. Panels 30 can also be cost-performance optimized for specific applications. Use of this technique reduces the required curing related dwell time of the panel 30 thereby speeding the manufacturing process. Other features could be incorporated into the panel 30 through the design of special extruded rigid foam insulation to manage sound attenuation. The rigid foam panels 36 can be less expensive and can have less insulating properties than the second rigid foam panels 37 and the spray-pour foam 18. This provides a well-insulated, cost-effective panel 30.
As an optional technique shown for example in
Generally, the panel 30 is as shown in
As is shown, the center area accommodates the electrical box 41 and an electrical conduit 43. To make up for the loss of insulation material cut away from the second rigid foam panel 37 to accommodate the electrical box 41 and electrical conduit 43, the third rigid foam panel 45 may be used instead of the rigid foam panel 36. The third rigid foam panel 45 may be of a different material than that of the rigid foam panels 36, and preferably the third rigid foam panel 45 would be have higher insulating properties than the rigid foam panel 36 to compensate for the loss of insulating material from second rigid foam panel 37. For example, the third rigid foam panel 45 can be of the same material as the second rigid foam panel 37 (for example, polyurethane foam board); however other materials may be used.
For all of the above embodiments, another benefit should be noted. In applications where a vapor barrier would be required, if the polyurethane layer (cured in-place foam and/or rigid foam board) is at least two inches thick across the entire panel, it may not be necessary to add a vapor barrier (depending upon the application and/or the relevant building codes in the applicable jurisdiction). This provides some additional cost saving.
As used herein, the term “rigid” when referring to the “rigid foam board” is used to mean that the foam is at least substantially cured and has a substantially defined shape, in contrast to spray-pour foam which is shaped and cured after being placed into the panel. As should be apparent, in the figures, the distance between the studs 14 is not to scale.
Although preferred embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/543,747, which was filed on Aug. 19, 2009 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,365,497, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/089,971, filed Aug. 19, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2314449 | Hoggatt | Mar 1943 | A |
3258889 | Butcher | Jul 1966 | A |
3503907 | Bonner, Jr. | Mar 1970 | A |
3605365 | Hastings | Sep 1971 | A |
3641724 | Palmer | Feb 1972 | A |
3785913 | Hallamore | Jan 1974 | A |
3796593 | Finelli | Mar 1974 | A |
3879908 | Weismann | Apr 1975 | A |
3991252 | Kolakowski et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4259028 | Cook | Mar 1981 | A |
4425396 | Hartman | Jan 1984 | A |
4471591 | Jamison | Sep 1984 | A |
4804506 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4914883 | Wencley | Apr 1990 | A |
5192598 | Forte et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5389167 | Sperber | Feb 1995 | A |
5765330 | Richard | Jun 1998 | A |
5787665 | Carlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5890334 | Hughes, Jr. | Apr 1999 | A |
5979131 | Remmele et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026629 | Strickland et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6099768 | Strickland et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119422 | Clear et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6164030 | Dietrich | Dec 2000 | A |
6322869 | Dietrich | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6415580 | Ojala | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6584749 | Sperber | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6727290 | Roth | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7008691 | Ogle | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7127856 | Hagen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127858 | Layfield | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7168216 | Hagen, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7574837 | Hagen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7882666 | Karalic | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8399062 | Romes et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8875472 | Korwin-Edson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20040109971 | Weinstein et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148889 | Bibee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060201089 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060272280 | Romes et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070234667 | Lubker et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080127600 | Schiffmann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090324924 | Romes et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100065206 | Romes | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100175810 | Korwin-Edson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110036030 | Hegland | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110138724 | Olang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120174511 | Harding | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130280467 | Fay | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140075872 | Mercado | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2097788 | May 1997 | CA |
4315533 | Dec 1994 | DE |
2589905 | May 1987 | FR |
2722811 | Jan 1996 | FR |
2000234402 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002188242 | Jul 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2009/001151, Mar. 3, 2011. |
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2009/001151, Sep. 29, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130008110 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61089971 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12543747 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13617164 | US |