The present invention relates to insulating glass units (IGUs) having a low emissivity (low-E) coating stack for films that are suspended and tensioned in the IGUs, with particular emphasis upon both the quality of the infrared reflecting layer formed in the coating stack and the resistance of the low-E coating stack to cracking or crazing.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,335,166 to Lizardo et al. describes an insulating glass unit (IGU) comprising a frame with spacers that support a heat-shrinkable plastic sheet between a pair of spaced apart, but substantially parallel, glass panes to provide an integral unit. Heating the assembled unit causes the plastic sheet to shrink so as to become taut and wrinkle-free. The plastic sheet may be a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film that can be coated on one or both sides with an infrared reflective material.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,799,745 to Meyer et al. describes visually transparent, infrared (IR) reflecting composite films useful in IGUs like that described in the aforementioned Lizardo patent. A transparent support can be selected from among rigid and non-rigid but minimally stretchable solids, including glass and various polymers (including PET). A layer stack of 3 or 7 alternating dielectric and metal layers is sputter-deposited onto one surface of the support. The dielectric layers can be composed of an inorganic metal or semi-metal oxide or salt having a refractive index between 1.75 and 2.25, such as indium oxide, tin oxide, titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, bismuth oxide, chromium oxide, zinc sulfide, magnesium fluoride, or mixtures thereof. Polymer dielectrics are also disclosed. The metal layers can be composed of silver, gold, platinum, palladium, aluminum, copper, nickel, or alloys thereof (e.g., silver alloyed with up to 25% gold). Spacer dielectric layers between the two or three metal layers have thicknesses between 40-200 nm, preferably 50-110 nm, and especially 70-100 nm. Boundary dielectric layers on the outside of the stack have thicknesses between 20-150 nm, preferably 25-90 nm, and especially 30-70 nm. (These thicknesses are for the inorganic dielectric materials. Polymer dielectric layers with their lower refractive index are disclosed to be somewhat thicker.) The metal layers have a combined total thickness between 12-80 nm, with each metal layer having a thickness between 4-40 nm, preferably 4-17 nm, especially 5-13 nm, with 10-12 nm each indicated for two-metal-layer stacks and 5-10 nm each for three-metal-layer stacks.
A variety of window assemblies have a film coating laminated to or deposited directly onto one or more glass substrates, rather than suspend a sheet in a space between pairs of glass panes.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,503,636 to Le Masson et al. describes a transparent polymer (e.g. polyester) substrate that is provided with a stack of layers including at least one silver layer reflecting thermal radiation. The stack is constructed to prevent stresses from causing it to delaminate or curl up. In particular, the presence of an AIN layer under tensile stress compensates for the compressive stresses in a less than 15 nm thick ZnO layer contiguous with the silver layer, so that the film will lie flat when laminated.
U.S. Reissued Pat. RE 37,446 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,532,062, both to Miyazaki et al., describe low emissivity films comprising a glass substrate coated with a stack of alternating oxide and metallic films. The oxide film furthest from the substrate has an internal stress not more than 1.1×1010 dyne/cm2 in order to prevent exfoliation of that surface film from the underlying metal layer due to moisture damage, with consequent turbidity or haze. In order to achieve this internal stress reduction, the 20-70 nm thick, outermost ZnO film is doped with at least one of Si, B, Ti, Mg, Cr, Sn or Ga in a total of up to 10 atomic %, and preferably 2 to 6 atomic %, with respect to the total quantity including Zn. The other oxide layers closer to the substrate may be selected from ZnO, SnO2, ZnO—SnO2 multi-layers, or a doped ZnO like the outermost oxide layer. At least one of the metal film layers may be an IR reflecting layer composed of Ag, or an alloy whose major component is Ag including at least one of Au, Cu and Pd.
Zinc oxide is a well-known seed layer for the growth of silver. The thicker the ZnO seed layer, the better the epitaxial growth of silver on the seed. This results in higher quality silver and consequently a lower emissivity for a given area-specific amount of silver. However, in contexts where a film layer is suspended in tension between windowpanes rather than directly coated onto a windowpane, the brittleness of the highly crystalline zinc oxide becomes a problem. Shrinking or tensioning of the film tends to cause zinc oxide layers to experience crazing, forming a network of myriad visible cracks. Too much shrinking (≧≈1.0%) results in cracked film. However, too little shrinking (≦≈0.5%) results in sagging or wrinkled film that is also visible as image distortions reflected from the film within the window. The distortion from low film tension is exaggerated when the IGU is exposed to elevated ambient temperatures since the thermal expansion coefficient of the film is higher than that of the glass panes.
Traditionally this has not been a problem because In2O3 has been used as the seed layer material, since In2O3 has a more amorphous or glassy structure in comparison and is therefore less subject to crazing. However, In2O3 is not as good a seed for the deposition of high quality (lower emissivity) silver.
An IGU is provided wherein the suspended and tensioned coated film has a ZnO seed layer that is at most 15 nm thick. The thinner ZnO is better able to withstand the strain of a tensioned film without crazing, while still able to serve as an adequate seed for high quality silver deposition.
With reference to
An alternative embodiment is seen in
Again, the IGU 31 is shown installed in an optional frame 33. Frames 13 or 33, not part of the invention itself, may be provided by secondary window manufacturers who purchase IGUs 11 or 31 from a primary manufacturer of the IGUs themselves, e.g. to supply decorative features to the windows they sell directly to consumers.
With reference to
With reference to
The first layer 53 immediately adjacent to the polymer substrate 51 may be an amorphous dielectric, such as indium oxide (In2O3). It is typically about 20 to 80 nm thick.
The second layer 55 may be the seed layer, composed of a more crystalline dielectric than the indium oxide layer 53. In particular, a seed layer 55 in accord with present invention is a zinc-based oxide layer that is a most 15 nm, and typically 5 to 10 nm thick. The zinc-based oxide layer is typically selected from any of a variety of silver-seeding layers including ZnO, aluminum-doped zinc oxide (with up to about 2% Al) (commonly known as ZAO), gallium-doped zinc oxide (with up to about 2% Ga) (commonly known as ZGO), ZnO/SnO2 (with the Sn content between 1% and 10% of the total zinc and tin content), and ZnO/In2O3 (with the In content being approximately 10% of the total zinc and indium content). The selected zinc-based oxide material may be sputtered from a ceramic or metallic target. The thinness of this ZnO layer 55 gives it the ability to withstand the strain of the tensioned sheet without cracking. A minimum thickness of 5 nm ensures that the outer surface of the ZnO layer 55 can serve as an adequate seed for high quality silver deposition.
The third coating layer 57 is the metallic infrared reflective low emissivity coating, which may be composed of silver or of a silver alloy that includes palladium, copper and/or gold. The thickness of the metallic layer 57 is typically 5 to 60 nm, giving it adequate visible light transmission.
A very thin (<5 nm) cap layer (not shown), such as nichrome (NiCr), Ti, ZAO or nichrome nitride (NiCrNx), may be coated on top of the silver layer to preserve the silver quality during the deposition of the outer dielectric.
An outer dielectric layer 59 is formed on the metallic layer 57. This may be composed of indium oxide, and is typically 20 to 50 nm thick. The choice of indium oxide for dielectric layers 53 and 59 is motivated by its crack resistance due to its amorphous quality, while zinc oxide is used for the seed layer to ensure high quality silver deposition for low emissivity. But the zinc oxide seed layer is kept thin enough to minimize its susceptibility to cracking under stress.
As seen in
With reference to
With reference to
A series of silver-based, low-emissivity films were prepared by coating a polyethylene terephthalate film having a thickness of 3 mil with a dielectric-silver-dielectric optical stack using standard sputtering techniques and a laboratory scale, moving web sputtering unit. Representative examples of sputtering methods and equipment can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,204,942 and 4,849,087. The sputtering apparatus was configured to sequentially deposit the dielectric and metal layers on the PET film using multiple, magnetron cathode zones as the PET film was advanced past the cathodes. The cathode zones were isolated from each other as minichambers thereby producing a local environment for the containment of the various plasma gases. This arrangement allows separate sputtering processes to be carried out simultaneously at each station with variations in atmosphere from station to station but with minimal cross-contamination between the cathode zones.
The metal oxide dielectric layers were deposited by direct reactive sputtering in the presence of a reactive gas mixture (oxygen, argon, nitrogen, and hydrogen). The metal layer, i.e., silver, was deposited on the dielectric layer by sputtering in the presence of an inert gas such as argon. An indium oxide dielectric layer was deposited on the silver layer. In some examples, a thin cap layer was deposited on top of the silver layer. The thickness of the various layers was controlled by standard means such as, for example, by varying the voltage and current fed to the electrode targets, the gas flow rates, and the speed at which the substrate is moved past the target.
Examples 1-6 were prepared by sputtering an indium oxide layer base layer directly on the PET film, followed by a zinc oxide seed layer of varying thicknesses, a 10 nm thick silver layer, and a 42 nm thick top layer of indium oxide. The combined thickness of the bottom indium oxide and zinc oxide layers was maintained at 42 nm in all of the Examples; thus, the thickness of the bottom indium oxide layer was reduced as the thickness of the zinc oxide seed layer was increased. Comparative Examples C1-C6 were prepared in an identical manner as Examples 1-6 except that no zinc oxide seed layer was added in Comparative Examples C4-C6. Examples 4-6 and Comparative Example C4 contained an additional <5 nm thick titanium cap layer deposited on top of the silver layer. Table 1 shows the thickness of the zinc oxide seed layer in nm for each of the Examples and Comparative Examples.
The films were tested for their ability to resist cracking when elongated using a Mandrel Bend Test as set forth in ASTM Method D522. This test method determines the cracking resistance (i.e., flexibility) of coatings deposited on sheet metal and other flexible substrates.
In the mandrel bend test, a 7 cm×10 cm coated sheet or film is bent over conical or cylindrical mandrels of various diameters and the presence of any cracks, color changes, adhesion failures, etc. of the optical coating is noted. Coatings attached to substrates are elongated when the substrates are bent during the manufacture of articles or when the articles are abused in service. As the mandrel diameter is reduced, the degree of elongation and stress applied to the film and coating is increased. Thus, the appearance or not of cracks as the films are bent by decreasing mandrel sizes reflects the degree of elasticity of the coating and its resistance to cracking under increasing levels of tension.
The results of the mandrel bend test for the above examples are shown in Table 1. As indicated by the data of Table 1, none of Examples 1-6 showed any cracking with mandrel diameters of 6 or above. These results are similar to the results from Comparative Examples C4-C6, which contained no seed layer. Comparative Examples C4-C6 each showed no cracking with a 6 mm mandrel but did exhibit cracking with a 5 mm mandrel. Examples 2 and 3 showed no cracking with a 5 mm mandrel and thus exhibited a higher resistance to cracking than the other samples. By contrast, Comparative Examples C1-C3, which have ZnO seed layers of 20-30 nm, showed cracking with the less demanding 6 mm mandrels.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/966,469, filed Dec. 13, 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,530,011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4204942 | Chahroudi | May 1980 | A |
4335166 | Lizardo et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4386130 | Hayashi et al. | May 1983 | A |
4419386 | Gordon | Dec 1983 | A |
4520611 | Shingu et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4536424 | Laurent | Aug 1985 | A |
4536998 | Matteucci et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4799745 | Meyer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4849087 | Meyer | Jul 1989 | A |
5061568 | Kessel et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5225273 | Mikoshiba et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5306547 | Hood et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325579 | Baier | Jul 1994 | A |
5532062 | Miyazaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5983593 | Carbary et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6261694 | Iacovangelo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
RE37446 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2001 | E |
6333084 | Woodard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6503636 | Le Masson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6582809 | Boire et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6805960 | Demiryont | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6919134 | Mitsuishi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974629 | Krisko et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7122252 | Hoffman | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150916 | Lemmer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153577 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7186465 | Bright | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7521096 | Lemmer et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7641978 | Veerasamy | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7758915 | Hoffman | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771830 | Neuman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8241752 | Bright | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8530011 | Kleinhempel et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20030228476 | Buhay et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20090068384 | Seth et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100316852 | Condo et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2008083308 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2009085741 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ASTM D522; Standard Test Methods for Mandrel Bend Test of Attached Organic Coatings. |
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,469, filed Dec. 13, 2010, Ronny Kleinhempel et al. |
USPTO Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/966,469. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130260062 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12966469 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13903360 | US |