The present invention relates to insulation such as fire insulation and/or protection. In particular, the present invention relates to an insulation structure for the internal insulation of a vehicle. The insulation structure may be useful for protecting the internal region of a vehicle from a fire incursion from outside the vehicle surroundings.
Conventional insulation systems, such as e.g. shown in
Insulation packages of this type are attached to the frames of the aircraft fuselage structure by means of fasteners which are typically made of plastic(s), for example, polyamide. The typical insulation systems, which comprise glass wool and simple plastic films, may have a burn-through time of approximately sixty seconds.
In case of fire in an aircraft parked on the ground, i.e. the “post-crash fire scenario” (
As mentioned above, typical fasteners of the insulation are made of non-metallic materials (plastics), which are usually not able to resist the fire in case of catastrophe for an extended period of time. Due to this, a collapse of the burning insulation (insulation packages) may occur, because of which uncontrollable obstructions or other fire danger points would (suddenly) be present.
WO 00/75012 A 1 discloses a fuselage insulation for an aircraft fuselage which is specified as “fire-blocking”. This publication discloses an insulation package which is positioned as the primary insulation within a spatial region which lies between the fuselage internal paneling and the fuselage external skin. In this case, this insulation package is protected in areas by a film made of fire-blocking material. This fire-blocking film region is directly facing toward the external skin of the aircraft fuselage (as a type of fire protection shield). Neglecting the fact that only insufficient protection of the insulation package and also the fuselage internal region from occurring fire may be provided using this suggestion, since during a fire catastrophe the flames of fire may pass from outside the aircraft through a damaged external skin and may feed on the internal insulation, i.e., would pass through the (only) fire-blocking, but not fire-resistant film upon permanent fire strain, the intended regional positioning of an only fire-blocking film may not be able to ensure fire protection safety in relation to the fuselage inside region for an extended period of time.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an insulation structure for the internal insulation of a vehicle is provided, which may be adapted for arrangement in an intermediate space between an internal paneling of the vehicle and an outside or external skin of the vehicle. The insulation structure comprises an insulation package with an insulation core which is embedded in the insulation package. Furthermore, there is a film of a burn-through safe film material, wherein the film material is an obstruction to a fire to which a film surface region of this film is subjected during a fire incident. According to an aspect of the present invention, the insulation package is essentially enveloped by the film.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention may allow for an improved insulation structure of a vehicle, which is used for internal insulation, in such a way that a fire incursion of the flames of a source of fire acting from outside the vehicle surroundings into the vehicle interior may prevented or may be delayed. Furthermore, it is believed that an increase of the fire protection safety for separate interior regions lying near a structure external skin being implemented through the type of film insulation of the insulation package may be achieved.
The present invention is described in greater detail with reference to an exemplary embodiment on the basis of the following drawings.
a shows an illustration of the details B shown in
In order to make the illustration in
The illustration in
In order to clarify improvements which may be achieved with exemplary embodiments of the present invention and an improved fire protection safety for spatial regions to be bulkheaded off, which include an intermediate space, the external skin 33, and internal paneling of the aircraft cabin positioned parallel and with spacing to the latter (defined and lying transversely to the fuselage longitudinal axis), with reference to the illustration in
In order to now implement this need for elevating the fire protection safety for separated interior regions proximal to a structure external skin, e.g. of a passenger aircraft, for example, a burn-through safe film 11 made of a fire-resistant film material is suggested, which completely envelops an insulation package 3, traditionally used for internal insulation of an aircraft fuselage, according to the pattern of
The further considerations include a typical insulation package 3 comprising fiberglass (glass wool), in which an insulation core 1 is embedded. In this case, the core material fulfills requirements in regard to thermal and acoustic insulation. This is (even here) typically a product of the fiber industry, fiberglass materials mainly being used. The type of attachment of the film-enveloped insulation package 3 and the use of corresponding fasteners in order to at least partially fulfill the need for a fire-protection safety in regard to the overall arrangement of the internal insulation of the aircraft fuselage will not be discussed in greater detail.
The film 11, which is suggested for enveloping the insulation package 3, is (for the intended purpose) to completely envelop the insulation package 3. It is implemented using a burn-through safe material, i.e., using a film material which is safe from burn through of the film wall because of the permanent effect of the flames of a fire 7 on the external surface of the film 11 and/or its film material. This film material is accordingly an absolute obstruction for a flaming fire 7, which a film surface region of this film 11 is subjected to during a fire catastrophe which is shown in
Since the statement “burn-through safe” is correlated very strongly with the statement “fire-resistant”, “fire-resistant” meaning something like “resistant to fire”, the film 11 is therefore implemented using a material of high and permanent fire resistance, which is implemented as sufficiently resistant. In this case, the level of this resistance to fire 7 is correlated to the type of film material used and the film wall thickness used, the permanence of the resistance being correlated to a usage period of the film 11, which is considered as a very long period of time and will then run over a (finite) duration of a longer chronological interval (calculated from the beginning of usage of the film 11); for example, until the end of a time at which the film material will lose its resistance to fire 7 because of film aging or it may be expected that this resistance to fire 7 will be reduced.
The statement “insensitive” assumes being “not sensitive” [Wahrig Deutsches Wörterbuch] to (here) the flame effect of the fire 7 on the film material. Since other sensitivities of the film material, for example, to environmental conditions at the usage location of the film 11 acting on the film material from outside the insulation package 3, would be conceivable, the statement “burn-through safe” mainly comprises the statement “insensitive” to occurring fire 7, the film material used certainly also able to be and (in aircraft construction) intended to be insensitive to other influences, for example, contamination and other chemical influences in the air, to the influence of electrical hazards, to the influence of the environmental air pressure, etc.
The film 11 is accordingly to be implemented using a material of high and permanent fire resistance which is implemented as resistant and/or insensitive to occurring fire 7, because of which a film wall does not burn through because of the influence of the flaming fire 7 even with permanent effect on the film surface region and propagation of the fire 7 flaming against the film surface region may be prevented or hindered.
A further embodiment of an insulation structure for internal insulation, which is installed in a commercial aircraft, for example, is shown in
Even if later, as indicated clearly in
In
In contrast to
The long and wide sides of the end section shaped in this way into an attachment end section 50 have a flat design (in the side view).
The final state of the Z-shaped folded attachment section 50 of the first film 11 may be approximately inferred from the detail B of
Taking out a through hole from the partial attachment end sections of the attachment end sections 33, 33a, 33b and/or the compacted end body sections perpendicular to the contact surfaces, through which a fastener, such as a screw-like connection element, is guided, using which the attachment end sections 50, 50a, 50b and/or the compacted end body sections are attached to the aircraft structure, will also be provided later.
It is also to be noted that usage of the burn-through safe films 11, 11a, 11b as a fire barricade or in correlation as a fire barrier is also considered.
It is also to be noted that this burn-through safe film 11 is implemented with a carrier film, on which the fibers of a fire barrier are applied. The fibers of the fire barrier are to be implemented using ceramic fibers. Accordingly, the possibility exists that a burn-through safe film 11 or a film reinforcement is formed from the ceramic fibers, this film reinforcement reinforcing at least one defined film region A of the film 11, which would otherwise be implemented using multiple layered films 11 lying one on top of another.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 001 083 | Jan 2004 | DE | national |
PCT/EP05/00045 | Jan 2005 | WO | international |
The present application claims priority of DE 10 2004 001 083 filed Jan. 5, 2004 and U.S. 60/600,107 filed Aug. 9, 2004, which are both hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/000045 | 1/5/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/1/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/068291 | 7/28/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2342839 | Byers | Feb 1944 | A |
3003902 | McDuff | Oct 1961 | A |
3567162 | Lea | Mar 1971 | A |
4598007 | Kourtides et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4805366 | Long | Feb 1989 | A |
4842465 | Pease et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4907923 | McGrath, Jr. | Mar 1990 | A |
5298694 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5759659 | Sanocki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5866231 | Bodin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5987833 | Heffelfinger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000107 | West | Dec 1999 | A |
6122387 | Borchers et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6177157 | Cota | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6231944 | Holt | May 2001 | B1 |
6314630 | Munk et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358591 | Smith | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6442806 | Wesson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6627561 | Wulliman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6777103 | Merkley et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7083147 | Movsesian et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7186360 | Benitsch | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7282252 | Fay et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20050211839 | Movsesian et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3111596 | Oct 1982 | DE |
19832000 | Nov 1999 | DE |
1134479 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1134479 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1164006 | Dec 2001 | EP |
9112131 | Aug 1991 | WO |
0075012 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0075012 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070018042 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60600107 | Aug 2004 | US |