The invention relates to an inlet for feeding air to an engine, and an aircraft.
In particular during takeoff and landing, and also while flying at low altitude, birds may collide with an aircraft, such as an airplane, and may damage the aircraft
In the event of such a ‘bird strike’ the engines (such as the fan and/or compressor) may be damaged when the bird or generally other objects contacting the aircraft enter the intake of the engine. This can result in high costs for the repair or the replacement of the engine.
One approach is to design and to test the engine for a defined bird strike (i.e., an impinging object with maximum weight, maximum density, etc.). This may mean that the engine indeed may be damaged, but in spite of the bird strike does not fail during the flight. The engine can function with reduced output until a safe landing.
The object of the invention is to make an aircraft safer, wherein only low maintenance costs are incurred.
This object is achieved in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
One aspect of the invention relates to an intake for feeding air to an engine of an aircraft. The aircraft may comprise one or more turbines, with which the air from the intake is compressed and ejected again in order to propel the aircraft.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the intake comprises an opening or an inlet for sucking in air, which points in the direction of movement of the aircraft, and an air duct between the (outer) opening and the engine, i.e. an outlet of the air duct. The air duct is curved in such a way that an impact region in the air duct is arranged after the opening in relation to the direction of movement of the aircraft, such that an object flying into the opening generally hits the impact region. In other words, the air duct of the intake does not run in a straight line to the engine, but can be curved, for example such that there does not have to be a direct line of sight between the opening of the intake and the engine.
An object flying into the intake along the direction of movement of the aircraft generally contacts an inner wall of the air duct (the impact region). The direction of movement may be a direction of continued movement of the aircraft. The direction of movement may correspond substantially to a longitudinal axis of the aircraft.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the impact region has a penetration region or a predetermined breaking region or predetermined breaking point, which is designed to be penetrated by the impinging object. By way of example, the penetration region may be destroyed or heavily deformed in the event of contact with the objet flying in. A penetration of the penetration region may signify, here, a plastic deformation of the penetration region. The penetration region may be a component part or an arrangement of component parts in the inner wall of the air duct and/or behind the inner wall, which component part or arrangement of component parts is designed to shatter or to heavily deform in order to absorb at least some of the energy of the impinging object.
The impinging object can infiltrate the penetration region and/or can break through the penetration region and can be deflected away from the engine. It is thus possible to prevent a bird, for example, from infiltrating the engine, and further subsequent damage can be avoided. Since the remains of the bird or at least a large part of these remains normally do not pass into the engine, the risk of damage to the engine is heavily reduced.
The penetration region (or the component part or the component parts or materials thereof) can be designed as replacement parts, which can be economically replaced during maintenance following contact with an object. By means of the introduction of a penetration region, a component part that can be easily replaced can be penetrated by a bird, for example, such that said bird does not reach the intake duct. It is thus possible to prevent the bird from damaging the engine, which is generally expensive. The aircraft remains able to continue the flight and to land safely. The comparatively economical replacement part can then be changed.
It is also possible that the intake intercepts impinging objects with high impact energy. An aircraft can also be protected against heavy birds. Even at high speed, an aircraft can be protected against objects infiltrating the intake.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, at least part of the intake protrudes from the aircraft. By way of example, the region of the intake after the opening may be shaped in a shell-like manner. The penetration region can be arranged in the part of the intake protruding from the aircraft.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the part of the intake protruding from the aircraft is separated at least partially from the aircraft upon impact of the object. In this way, the output of the engine indeed may be reduced, but on the other hand the aircraft can still land safely without difficulty, and a repair of the aircraft is possible by simple installation of an economical replacement part.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention the penetration region extends from an inner wall of the air duct to an outer wall of the intake, such that an object contacting the penetration region breaks through the penetration region (with sufficiently high impact energy) and leaves the aircraft. The impinging object can be deflected away from the engine, for example by breaking through a part protruding from the aircraft (in a straight line). In this case as well the output of the engine indeed may be reduced. However, the aircraft can land without difficulty and can be repaired economically.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the penetration region comprises a cavity or a hollow space, in which the object contacting the penetration region is stopped. By way of example a cavity may be arranged behind an inner wall, which is designed to break upon impact of an object, the impinging object being received in said cavity.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the penetration region comprises a material that at least partially absorbs an impact energy of the impinging object. This material may be, for example, an inner wall of the air duct, which is designed to break upon impact of the object. By way of example, the material may be a plastic and/or a lightweight structure, whereas other parts of the inner wall consist of metal. It is also possible that the material can absorb the entire movement energy of the impinging object by way of plastic deformation, this material being a foam, for example.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the penetration region comprises a first material, which is designed to absorb a first part of an impact energy of the impinging object, and a second material, which is arranged after the first material in relation to the direction of movement of the aircraft and which is designed to absorb a remaining part of the impact energy. By way of example, the first material may be an easily destroyable part of the inner wall of the air duct, and the second material may be a foam.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a material for absorbing an impact energy is arranged in a cavity that serves to stop the impinging object. By way of example, the cavity can be lined with this material, for example foam.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the penetration region comprises a flap, which in a closed position provides part of an inner wall of the air duct. The flap can be held in an open position by means of material arranged in the penetration region.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the flap is preloaded by way of a spring mechanism, such that the flap, after infiltration of the impinging object into the penetration region, closes the inner wall of the air duct. By way of example, the impinging object may clear away a material in the penetration region that holds the flap in the open position, and may thus release the flap. Even after the contact of the object, the air duct can thus continue to perform its function without great limitation. The air flowing through the opening of the intake can be conveyed further on to the engine.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a surface of the penetration region in the air duct is provided with a radar-absorbing material. The surface, for example the surface of the flap or the surface of a material of the inner wall of the penetration region, for example may comprise such a material or may be coated therewith. In particular, a replacement part of the penetration region can be produced or disguised with radar-absorbing material.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the air duct in a surrounding environment of the penetration region has a curvature through at least 90° (for example up to 180°). The air duct may comprise an intake manifold, in which the penetration region is arranged. Predetermined breaking points can be installed in this intake manifold and also in the (outer) covering. A defined region at the intake manifold can thus be designed such that a bird, for example, breaks through the inner wall and no longer infiltrates the region in front of the engine.
A further aspect of the invention relates to an aircraft, for example a manned or unmanned aircraft or a drone. The aircraft may be a disguised aircraft, which has a low radar signature, a low infrared signature and/or low acoustic signature. The aircraft may be a flying wing.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the aircraft comprises at least one intake, as has been described above and as will be described below, and an engine, which is arranged offset in relation to the opening of the intake. Here, an object flying into the intake contacts the penetration region, is generally deflected from the air duct of the intake, and cannot infiltrate the engine.
It is possible that the demands on the engine in terms of bird strike are reduced in this way. The weight of the engine can thus be reduced. Whereas conventional engine designs are generally designed for a maximum bird strike (which is derived statistically), it is possible to ensure by way of the predetermined breaking point that even heavy birds do not damage the engine.
In particular for military aircraft, which generally also operate at low flying altitude, at which most birds are normally found, the problems emanating from a bird strike can be reduced.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the engine is arranged against the direction of movement of the aircraft. By means of a reverse engine integration, a radar signature of the aircraft can be reduced further than with a conventionally disguised intake.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described hereinafter in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In principle, identical or similar parts are provided with like reference signs.
The aircraft 10 has a substantially kite-like, flat form, in which all engine openings (intake opening 12 and outlet opening 14) are arranged on an upper side.
Two engines 16 are arranged laterally, symmetrically with respect to a center axis of the aircraft 10 and are arranged against the direction of movement 18 of the aircraft 10. Also symmetrically with respect to the center axis, there is associated with each engine 16 an intake 20, by which air is fed to the respective engine 16, and an outlet 22, via which the air compressed by the engine 16 is rejected rearward (against the direction of movement 18).
Here, the air flows into an intake opening 12, which points in the direction of movement 18, and then into an air duct 24, which leads to the engine 16. The air duct 24 has a region 26 with a curvature through 180°, which runs from top to bottom (with respect to a normal flying position of the aircraft 10).
After the curved region 26, the air duct 24 leads into the engine 16. The outlet 22 has a region 28 with a curvature through 180°, which runs orthogonally to the curvature of the region 26. After the region 28, the outlet 22 leads into the outlet opening 14.
In
The aircraft 10 shown in
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
As
In addition it is noted that “comprising” does not rule out any other elements or steps, and “a” or “one” does not rule out a plurality. It is also noted that features or steps that have been described with reference to one of the above exemplary embodiments can also be used in combination with other features or steps of other above-described exemplary embodiments. Reference signs in the claims are not to be considered as limiting.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 023 718 | Dec 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2013/000712 | 12/2/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/086329 | 6/12/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3329377 | Peterson | Jul 1967 | A |
3971218 | Toth, Jr. | Jul 1976 | A |
4346860 | Tedstone | Aug 1982 | A |
4354346 | Wooding | Oct 1982 | A |
4456458 | Gilbertson | Jun 1984 | A |
4617028 | Ray et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4713934 | Pellow | Dec 1987 | A |
4972672 | Sanderson | Nov 1990 | A |
5697394 | Smith et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5779189 | Hamstra | Jul 1998 | A |
5906334 | Chamay | May 1999 | A |
5971000 | Koncsek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
20100212285 | Negulescu | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130206920 | Bichler et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101855135 | Oct 2010 | CN |
888 510 | Sep 1953 | DE |
914 920 | Jul 1954 | DE |
32 42 248 | Jun 1983 | DE |
37 13 875 | Jul 1988 | DE |
39 01 010 | Aug 1990 | DE |
10 2010 023 938 | Dec 2011 | DE |
2 223 856 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 327 627 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2 149 017 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2 182 670 | May 2002 | RU |
2 271 964 | Mar 2006 | RU |
80431 | Feb 2009 | RU |
WO 0212690 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) dated Jun. 3, 2014 with English-language translation (seven (7) pages). |
German-language Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) dated Jun. 3, 2014 (six (6) pages). |
Chinese Office Action issued in Chinese counterpart application No. 201380063793.5 dated Apr. 5, 2016 (Eight (8) pages). |
Russian Search Report issued in Russian counterpart application No. 2015123293/11(036321) dated Oct. 27, 2017 (Seven (7) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150314883 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |