1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to dispersion resistant digital optical transmitters.
2. The Relevant Technology
The quality and performance of a digital transmitter is determined by the distance over which the transmitted digital signal can propagate without severe distortions. This is typically characterized as the distance over which a dispersion penalty reaches a level of about 1 dB. A standard 10 Gb/s optical digital transmitter, such as an externally modulated optical source (e.g., a laser), can transmit up to a distance of about 50 km in standard single mode fiber, at 1550 nm, before the dispersion penalty reaches the level of about 1 dB. This distance is typically called the dispersion limit.
The Bit Error Rate (BER) of an optical digital signal after propagation though fiber, and the resulting distortion of the signal, are determined mostly by the distortions of a few bit sequences. The 101 bit sequence, and the single bit 010 sequence, are two examples of bit sequences that have high frequency content and tend to distort most after dispersion in a fiber, leading to errors in the bit sequence. Transmission techniques that can alleviate the distortion for these bit sequences increase the dispersion tolerance of the entire data pattern.
In view of the foregoing it would be advancement in the art to provide an apparatus and method for increasing the dispersion tolerance of an optical digital transmitter, particularly for high-frequency data.
In one aspect of the invention, an optical transmission system includes an optical transmitter, an optical receiver, and an optical fiber having a first end coupled to the optical transmitter and a second end coupled to the optical receiver. The optical fiber includes a dispersive material and defines an optical path length between the first and second ends. The optical transmitter includes a laser transmitter operable to emit a digital signal comprising a train of zero and one bits, the one bits comprising adiabatic pulses. The pulses have an adiabatic frequency excursion between a base frequency and a peak frequency.
The train of zero and one bits may include a high frequency sequence comprising a first one bit followed by a zero bit followed by a second one bit. The frequency excursion has a value such that the phase difference between the first one bit and the second one bit at a middle point of the zero bit between them is between π/2 and −π/2 radians when the bit sequence arrives at the receiver.
In another aspect of the invention, the adiabatically chirped pulses of the one bits have a 1/e2 pulse width τ0 upon exiting the transmitter and a 1/e2 pulse width pulse width τ upon traveling to the receiver through the optical fiber. The frequency excursion (ΔvAD) between the base frequency and the peak frequency approximately satisfies the relation ΔvAD(τ−τ0)erf(1)=¼ such that the 1 bits interfere destructively at a middle point of an intervening zero bit having a duration T.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
The optical transmitter 12 may be a directly frequency modulated laser coupled to an optical spectrum reshaper, such as is used in the commercially available Chirp Managed Laser (CML™). Alternatively, the transmitter 12 includes a directly modulated distributed feedback (DFB) laser for FM generation and a separate amplitude modulator (AM). In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the optical transmitter generates optical pulses that are amplitude modulated and frequency modulated such that the temporal frequency modulation profile of the pulses substantially follows the temporal amplitude modulation profile. We call these pulses adiabatically chirped amplitude modulated pulses (ACAM).
Dispersion tolerance of pulses generated by the optical signal source 12 are enhanced when pulses have a flat-top chirp and the adiabatic chirp is chosen to produce a π phase shift between 1 bits separated by odd number of 0 bits. This is evident by considering a 101 bit sequence. In this case, as the 1 bits spread in time, they interfere destructively in the middle due to the uniform π phase shift across the pulse. Accordingly, the dispersion tolerance tends to be relatively independent of distance, because the phase across each pulse is constant and any overlap is adding destructively.
In a pulse generated according to embodiments of the present invention, the optical transmitter 12 is modulated to produce an adiabatically chirped amplitude modulated (ACAM) pulse sequence that manifests superior dispersion tolerance. In some embodiments, the chirp is not flat-topped, but varies adiabatically with the amplitude of the pulse. Hence the phase across the pulse is not constant and is varying.
The adiabatic chirp and the crossing percentage can be arranged according to a novel integral rule, described below, to optimize transmission at a particular distance. Optical cross over is a convenient representation of the pulse duty cycle for a random digital bit sequence, and is defined below. For example, for a 100% duty cycle pulse, where the single 1 bit duration is equal to the bit period, the cross-over is 50%.
Digital data consists of 1s and 0s, at a bit rate, B=1/T, where T is the bit period. For a B=10 Gb/s system, T=100 ps. The 1 and 0 bits each occupy time durations □1, and □0 respectively, such that
□1+□0=2T. (1)
The duty cycle is defined as the fraction of the duration of the 1s to twice the bit period;
D=□1/2T. (2)
A non-return-to-zero digital data stream is often shown on a sampling oscilloscope in the form of an “eye diagram,”, as in
In some embodiments, pulses are formed according to an integral rule such that the phase difference between the peaks of two 1 bits separated by a 0 bit are adjusted such that the phase difference between the two pulses in the middle of the 0 bit becomes equal to π at a desired propagation distance. This guarantees that the interference of the 1 bits in the middle of the 0 bit, which is separating them, is maximally destructive, leading to a minimum at the desired distance. This causes the phase margin near the 0 bit and the extinction ratio to increase with propagation distance.
For a fixed crossing percentage, the optimum adiabatic chirp decreases with increasing propagation distance. Also optimum chirp increases for higher crossing percentage. It should be noted that the integral rule assumes that the bit sequence limiting propagation is the 101 bit sequence. So the optimum conditions of the transmitter may be somewhat different to accommodate other limiting bit sequences. For example, single 1 bits spread less if they have higher crossing (longer 1s width). So it is advantageous to use a high crossing. However, the 101 bit should still maintain integrity for lower crossing, as long as the integral rule is satisfied.
Where ΔvAD is the adiabatic chirp, defined as peak frequency excursion of the frequency profile of the pulse, and Δv(t) is the time varying instantaneous frequency profile of the pulse. For example, as shown in
This ACAM signal can be generated by a variety of ways, including using a directly frequency modulated laser coupled to an optical spectrum reshaper, such as is used in the commercially available Chirp Managed Laser (CML™). The ACAM signal may be generated by an independent distributed feedback (DFB) laser for FM generation and a separate amplitude modulator placed after the laser modulator. When the frequency modulation is generated by a DFB laser, the resulting output field has continuous phase. Hence the phase in the center of the 0 bit between the two 1 bits is ½ the phase difference between the peaks of E1 and E2.
Upon propagation through a dispersive fiber, the pulses broaden and their wings overlap. The instantaneous frequency of the pulses has two contributions: 1) the adiabatic chirp of the original pulse, and 2) the linear chirp introduced by fiber dispersion, which introduces a quadratic phase variation across the pulse. In the absence of adiabatic chirp this quadratic phase is the same for the two 1 bit pulses in the 101 sequence. Because of the quadratic symmetry, the dispersion-induced phase is the same for the E1 and E2 pulses in the middle of the 0 bit between the 1 bits, where they overlap. Hence the overlapped pulses interfere constructively, causing the 0 level to rise at the 0 bit and increase the 0→1 bit error rate. This is a key feature of the distorted eye for a chirp-free externally modulated transmitter after fiber propagation.
The curve 18 of
I(t)=E12(t)+E22(t)+2E1*(t)E2(t)cos(Φ1t−Φ2t) (2)
Here Φ1t and Φ2t are the phases of the field at time t for the 1 bits, E1 and E2. In order to have destructive interference, the phase difference has to be ideally π, however, any value in the range π/2≦Φ2t−Φ1t≦−π/2 (modulo 2π) will cause some destructive interference since the cosine function is negative in this range. This accounts for the large range of usable distances, and adiabatic chirp values for which the resulting optical eye is relatively open and the BER is acceptably low. Using Eq. 1 the phases at t=T are given in terms of the shaded areas A1 and A2 to be
Φ1t=Φ1+A1=A1
Φ2t=Φ2−A2 (3)
In the case that the pulses broaden approximately symmetrically, A1=A2, the condition for destructive interference becomes
Φ2t−Φ1t=Φ2−2A(z)≈π (4)
According to Eq. 4, optimum cancellation is achieved when the phase difference between the peaks of two 1 bits separated by a zero is given by
Note that the phase difference, Φ2, between the two 1 bits separated by a single 0 bit, has to be larger than π in order to get cancellation at distance z. This is distinctly different from the case of flat-top chirp, in which the phase difference is equal to π. It is interesting to note that since the phase difference has to be π modulo 2π, that phase difference 2A(z)−π will also provide a cancellation at the middle of the pulses. In Eq. 5, the integral is a dimensionless factor, which depends only on the pulse shape, rise time and fall times. This factor decreases with increasing pulse duty cycle; i.e. increasing eye crossing percentage. So a higher chirp required for pulses with higher duty cycle (higher crossing percentage) is expected. For experimental conditions using a directly frequency modulated laser coupled to an optical spectrum reshaper, such as the commercially available CML™, we find that for ΔvAD=6.5 GHz, crossing percentage of 55%, rise time ˜35 ps, and fall time ˜35 ps, which were optimized for 2300 ps/nm dispersion, the phase difference is Φ2=1.3π. This value was calculated from a measured pulse shape and assuming adiabatic chirp. For this condition the CML™ gave a <10−6 bit error rate at 10.7 Gb/s at 22 dB optical signal to noise ratio (OSNR) after 2300 ps/nm of dispersion and satisfies the industry requirements. It is important to note that the receiver used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention is a standard 10 Gb/s direct detection receiver having a bandwidth of approximately 75% of the bit rate. Also, the optical eye diagram of the resulting signal at the receiver is a standard two-level intensity modulated eye diagram. This is because the destructive interference between bits keeps the optical eye open.
The valley area, between the two overlapping pulses, A(z), decreases with increasing distance, as the pulses broaden. This implies that the optimum adiabatic chirp decreases with increasing distance. For a Gaussian pulse the area, A(z), up to the middle of the zero bit between the two 1 bits, at t=T, can be approximated by
A(z)=2πΔvAD(T−√{square root over (τ02+β22z2/τ02)}erf(T/τ)) (6)
Where τ0 is the 1/e2 pulse width of the 1 bit before propagation, τ=√{square root over (τ02+β22z2/τ02)} is the pulse width after propagation, β2 is the fiber dispersion in ps2/km, and z is propagation distance. Substituting Eq. 6 for the area into Eq. 5 for the integral rule for Gaussian pulses to calculate Φ2 in terms of the adiabatic chirp and initial pulse width, τ0, we obtain an explicit dependence of optimum adiabatic chirp on pulse width:
ΔvAD(τ×erf(T/τ)−τ0×erf(T/τ0))=¼ (7)
As an example, according to Eq. 7, for τ=90 ps and τ0=50 ps, the optimum adiabatic chirp is ˜ 7 GHz. It is important to note that τ is an increasing function of the transmission distance τ=√{square root over (τ02+β22z2/τ02)}, and so the optimum chirp according to Eq. 7 will decrease with increasing distance:
According to some embodiments of an invention, for a given dispersive medium having an optical path length between the transmitter 12 and the receiver 16, the initial pulse width τ0 and frequency excursion ΔvAD are chosen such that Eq. 7 will be satisfied near the receiver, so as to generate a phase shift equal to π between 1 bits separated by single 0 bits, for a given pulse width τ near the receiver 16 after dispersion of the pulse while traveling through the dispersive medium.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
The Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/877,425, filed Dec. 28, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324295 | Harris | Jun 1967 | A |
3973216 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3999105 | Archey et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4038600 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4561119 | Epworth | Dec 1985 | A |
4671604 | Soref | Jun 1987 | A |
4754459 | Westbrook | Jun 1988 | A |
4805235 | Henmi | Feb 1989 | A |
4841519 | Nishio | Jun 1989 | A |
4896325 | Coldren | Jan 1990 | A |
4914667 | Blonder et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5088097 | Ono et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5119393 | Oka et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136598 | Weller et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5177630 | Goutzoulis et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5293545 | Huber | Mar 1994 | A |
5325378 | Zorabedian | Jun 1994 | A |
5325382 | Emura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5371625 | Wedding et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5412474 | Reasenberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416629 | Huber | May 1995 | A |
5434693 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450432 | Okuda | Sep 1995 | A |
5459799 | Weber | Oct 1995 | A |
5465264 | Buhler et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477368 | Eskildsen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5550667 | Krimmel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5568311 | Matsumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
5592327 | Gabl et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5696859 | Onaka et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5737104 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5777773 | Epworth et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805235 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5856980 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5920416 | Beylat et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946129 | Xu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953139 | Nemecek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953361 | Borchert | Sep 1999 | A |
5974209 | Cho et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991323 | Adams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018275 | Perrett et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6081361 | Adams et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088373 | Hakki | Jul 2000 | A |
6096496 | Frankel | Aug 2000 | A |
6104851 | Mahgerefteh | Aug 2000 | A |
6115403 | Brenner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6157025 | Katagiri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188499 | Majima | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222861 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271959 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282003 | Logan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298186 | He | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331991 | Mahgerefteh | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351585 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359716 | Taylor | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6421151 | Berger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459518 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473214 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486440 | Crafts et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506342 | Frankel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522809 | Takabayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6353623 | Munks | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6563623 | Penninckx et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577013 | Glenn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580739 | Coldren | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618513 | Evankow, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628690 | Fish et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650667 | Nasu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654564 | Colbourne et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658031 | Tuganov et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665351 | Hedberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687278 | Mason et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690686 | Delfyett | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6738398 | Hirata | May 2004 | B2 |
6748133 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778307 | Clark | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785308 | Dyer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810047 | Oh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834134 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836487 | Farmer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847758 | Watanabe | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6943951 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947206 | Tsadka et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963685 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7013090 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027470 | May | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054538 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073956 | Shin et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076170 | Choa | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7123846 | Tateyama et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164865 | Tatsuno et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187821 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7263291 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280721 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7352968 | Tayebati | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356264 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376352 | Tayebati | May 2008 | B2 |
7406266 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406267 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433605 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474859 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477851 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480464 | McCallion et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492976 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502532 | McCallion et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505694 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515626 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7536113 | Matsui et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542683 | Matsui et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555225 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558488 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564889 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7609977 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613401 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616902 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630425 | Tayebati et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639955 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657179 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663762 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697186 | McCallion et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697847 | Matsui et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742542 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760777 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778295 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809280 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20010012430 | Usami et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010048705 | Kitaoka et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002099 | Hara et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012369 | Nasu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020044738 | Jablonski | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048290 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063930 | Blauvelt | May 2002 | A1 |
20020131047 | Zarrabian et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154372 | Chung et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159490 | Karwacki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176659 | Lei et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002120 | Choa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030063647 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067952 | Tsukiji et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077031 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099018 | Singh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030147114 | Kang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161370 | Buimovich et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169787 | Vergaftman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193974 | Frankel et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210912 | Leuthold | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008933 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008937 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036943 | Freund et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076199 | Wipiejewski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081386 | Morse et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096221 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040218890 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234200 | Jennings et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050100345 | Welch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111852 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152702 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163512 | Tayebati et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169638 | Tayebati et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050169642 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175356 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206989 | Marsh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213993 | Kazemi-Nia et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050249509 | Nagarajan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271394 | Whiteaway et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286829 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286909 | Kish et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002718 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008272 | Abeles et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018666 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029358 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029396 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029397 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060120416 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060193636 | Katagiri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060228120 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2006 | A9 |
20060233556 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239306 | Donanhoe | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060274993 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070286608 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002990 | McCallion et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037608 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080166134 | McCallion et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181619 | Heismann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187325 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193132 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193144 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240180 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247763 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247765 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291950 | McCallion et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090003842 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090060526 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080905 | Olsson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090196631 | Daghighian et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090238224 | Ye | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090269069 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100008679 | Cole | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100098436 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1236891 | Dec 1999 | CN |
052758 | Jul 1992 | EP |
602659 | Jun 1994 | EP |
2 107 147 | Apr 1983 | GB |
58-075340 | May 1983 | JP |
62-189832 | Aug 1987 | JP |
09-214427 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11-031859 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000105313 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-036477 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-284711 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001291928 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001320328 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002243935 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002267834 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002267998 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-311235 | Oct 2002 | JP |
9905804 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0104999 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0117076 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0118919 | Mar 2001 | WO |
03005512 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080159747 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60877425 | Dec 2006 | US |