This application relates to an integral powered wing aircraft (or IPWA). More specifically the present invention relates to an aircraft design consisting of two concentrically oriented contra-rotating discs, whereby rotational forces generated by the discs are equal and in opposition to each other such that a central axis remains fixed. This invention consists of a series of aeronautical performance enhancements that may be applied individually or collectively to the various embodiments described. This patent application will then introduce disc stacking a variation of the prior embodiments, which use individual discs rotating concentrically about a canopy and anchored to a central axle. The contra-rotating discs are stacked one above the other as contrasted with a concentric configuration in prior embodiments. The series of aeronautical enhancements referenced above will then be collectively incorporated in the presentation of the preferred embodiment.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by extending the mounting arms of the inner concentric disc out to the outer diameter of the outer concentric disc. The linear synchronized electromagnetic drive motor [LSEDM] lower section is then removed from the outer edge of the inner disc and relocated and attached to the end of these extended mounting arms. The upper section of [LSEDM] that in prior embodiments is mounted to the inner edge of the outer concentric disc is now mounted to the bottom of the outer edge of the outer disc. The LSEDM is now located at the maximum extremity of the circumference of the outer disc thus maximizing the effective torque of the LSEDM about the central axle. The larger LSEDM will create greater force and the longer mounting arm radii will amplify the torque. A larger internal combustion engine [ICE] and electric generator may be provided for even greater performance.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the prior embodiments performance by providing a vertical rim about the outer circumference of the outer concentric circle. These prior embodiment include the embodiments disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,950,603 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,559,506, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein for all purposes. The vertical rim shall extend some distance above the top horizontal plane of the disc so as to obstruct the air flow from the outer edges. The effect is to reduce the average ambient atmospheric pressure above the disc.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by providing a vertical rim about the outer circumference of the outer concentric circle. The vertical rim about and extending below the outer circumference of the outer concentric circle shall extend downward for some distance, but at least including the Directional Stabilizer within the rim. This will enhance performance by concentrating the downward air flow to increase the average ambient atmospheric pressure below the contra-rotating discs and canopy from above.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by extending short air foil segments out from the outer circumference of the outer disc. This provides additional lift. Placing a rim about the outer loose edge reinforces the foil and adds even more lift.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance performance of prior embodiments by changing the two contra-rotating concentric discs into two discs each having the same outer diameter and approximately the same inner diameter. The two discs are stacked, one above the other, and both contra rotate concentrically about the canopy or core. The LSEDM is mounted between and about the outer edge of the two contra-rotating stacked discs.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by adding a thin, short, lightweight skirt about the outer rim of the directional stabilizer. This will allow the contra-rotating discs to force air into the non-rotating skirt which will create a ground effect lift on the IPWA when it is travelling a few inches above water, sand, snow, desert, or similar flat surface.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by continuing with objective #5 above and modifying it as follows. The single large disc containing air foils along the radii of its surface is replaced with three concentric discs with total area, radii and circumference approximately equivalent to the one disc they replace. These concentric discs create rows of air foils held in place by rims on each side. The second disc is below the upper disc. The surface of this second disc may be similar to a turbine blade, a fan, a tapered spiral of any appropriate shape. This disc rotates about the axle. An LSEDM around the outer circumference of the largest upper disc and the full lower disc drives the two discs in opposing directions. There is an LSEDM between the inner edge of the outermost disc and the outer edge of the second largest concentric disc. The larger disc drives the second larger disc in the same direction as itself, but at greater rate of revolutions per minute. Similarly there is a LSEDM positioned between the inner edge of the second largest concentric disc and the outer edge of the smallest and innermost concentric disc. The lower disc may have steep angled blades to create a greater rotational resistance and simultaneously increasing the downward push on air flow to the directional stabilizer. The blades become steeper in angle as it gets closer to the center.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by continuing with objective #5 above and modifying it as follows. The single large disc contains air foils along the radii of its surface as well as various other contours and configurations to enhance or aid lift. This disc (a) has a single large disc (b) below it and has a LSEDM that drives the contra-rotation of the two discs against one another, as in objective #5, except the upper disc offers greater resistance than the lower disc by itself. It requires more energy to rotate the upper disc than the lower disc. Furthermore, it is understood that when the upper disc reaches maximum velocity, it can create no additional lift from its air foils. So it is desirable to gain additional lift from air below these two discs. So a third disc similar to the second disc is added below disc #2. Then a fourth disc similar to disc #2 is stacked below disc #3. There is a LSEDM between the second and third discs, and the third and fourth disc. However, the second, third, and fourth discs may or may not all be rotating in the same direction. The third may rotate in the opposite direction. The third may rotate at more RPM's than the second. The fourth may rotate at more RPM's than the third.
It is an objective of this invention to enhance the performance of prior embodiments by combining all the enhancements #1 through #8 to create an enhanced preferred embodiment.
This invention discloses a number of aeronautical enhancements to the prior embodiments that can be combined in part or collectively to provide enhancements that can be combined in part or collectively to provide an enhancement that is a faster, more powerful, better performing and more efficient aircraft than the prior art. This invention disclosure also introduces an additional preferred embodiment that creates the new concept of disc stacking.
The present invention relates to an integral powered winged aircraft or “IPWA”. More specifically, the invention relates to an aircraft wherein lift is generated by two discs which rotate about a central axis. The discs generate equal and opposite forces such that the central axis remains fixed, thereby allowing it to be used for a crew or cargo compartment. In one embodiment, the two discs are concentrically located. The various components of the present invention, and the manner in which they interrelate, will be described in greater detail hereinafter.
Placing the LSEDM 42 at the outer edge of this larger radius increases the torque arm of the LSEDM and thus the speed and lift of the vehicle 20, even if LSEDM 42 simply continues to exert the same force between the upper and lower sections of the LSEDM because the discs will be rotating faster with the same level of power input.
The upper rim 88 described in
A lower disc 142 is attached by mounting arms 144 to lower bearing 146 and extended sleeve 148 which both wrap over and around the upper bearing extended sleeve 134. The extended sleeve 148 has gear teeth 152 about its perimeter. These gear teeth 152 are driven in the opposite direction by drive gear 154 attached to gear box 156 powered by internal combustion engine 118. The lower disc 142 is rotated in the opposite direction of the upper disc 126. There are numerous ways to configure these disc motors.
Whenever the contra rotating discs, as illustrated in
When the torque is being created by an LSEDM at the outer circumference of a disc there is only a radial load on the mounting arms. The torque coming back to the bearings is minimal because any unbalanced torque is relieved by rotation of the bearings around the axle.
So when the torque to drive the discs is being transferred through the mounting arms then the mounting arms need circumferential and rotational bracing as shown in the Circular Truss Diagram claim in
In
With the skirt in place the IPWA should be able to travel faster than if it were traveling in water, but consume less energy than it would traveling several feet above ground. The directional/stabilizer would still be used to control the vehicle movements.
Discs 182, 184 and 186 rotate outside and inside one another. Their surfaces are a series of air foils or any combination of contours and configurations that will create and enhance the lifting capacity of these discs. The surface of the lower disc 192 shall be similar to a turbine blade, a fan, a tapered spiral, or any configuration that will increase lift by forcing down the air it receives from the discs above it. The lower disc 192 may be two or more discs driven in the same or opposite rotational direction. A directional/stabilizer 194 is located below the lowest rotating disc 192 and can be attached back to the central axle.
Outer disc 182 has an LSEDM 196 attached between the outer rim of lower disc 192. These discs exert equal and opposite forces against one another to create the counter rotation.
An LSEDM 196 is located between the inner rim of disc 182 and the outer rim of disc 184. Disc 184 is driven in the same direction as disc 182 but at a greater speed of rotation.
An LSEDM 196 is also located between the inner rim of disc 184 and the outer rim of disc 186. Disc 186 rotates in the same direction as disc 184 but at a greater speed of rotation.
Each disc has its own set of mounting arms back to the central axle and each disc receives its own electric current flow from its own mounting arms.
There are bearings 198 between the inner rim of disc 186 and the outer rim of the canopy 188.
The maximum revolutions per minute that disc 182 may rotate is limited as the outer rim approaches the speed of sound. However if disc 184 was rotating at the same speed as disc 182, it would not be reaching this upper limit. This allows the LSEDM 196 to drive disc 184 faster until the outer rim of disc 184 approaches the speed of sound. Next, an LSEDM 196 between disc 184 and disc 186 accelerates the rotation of disc 186 until the outer rim of disc 186 approaches the speed of sound. With all three disc rotating at maximum RPM in the same direction of rotation maximum lift can be achieved, provided enough energy is available. This is one of two major advantages of partitioning one large top disc into two or more concentric discs that can rotate independently. It is understood that an alternative to the LSEDM is to have one or more motors or drive trains at the axle that drives each of the mounting arms in the appropriate direction and speed. The motor can be an internal combustion engine, electric motor or any type of drive motor.
There is a second major purpose for changing one large disc into two or more concentric discs. When the large disc is rotating near maximum RPM the radial g forces are enormous. They can easily exceed 1000 g's. By partitioning the one large disc into multiple discs the length of the airfoil and radial length of the disc is decreased. This decreases the g forces in each of the narrower concentric discs. If a concentric disc is simply a thin inner narrow band and a thin outer narrow band with airfoils attached between them then each airfoil will be in tension (tensile stress) where it is attached to the inner band and in compression (compressive stress) where it is attached to the outer band. Somewhere near the middle of each airfoil there would be a place where there is neither tensile stress nor compression forces. Creating multiple concentric discs makes it much easier (and allows a lighter vehicle) to control these radial forces.
The lower disc has the same maximum rotational limits as the upper disc. It is for this reason that an additional 1, 2, or more similar turbine like discs may be necessary below the lower disc 192 just so the lower discs collectively can counter for the collective momentum of the three concentric upper level rotating discs.
In
This application claims priority to co-pending provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/546,141 filed on Oct. 12, 2011, and entitled “Integral Powered Wing Aircraft Utilizing Full Rotary Disc Stacking with Aeronautical Enhancements.” The contents of this co-pending application are fully incorporated herein for all purposes. This application also claims priority to and is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 13/118,509 filed on May 30, 2011, and entitled “Integral Powered Winged Aircraft for Infantry and Artillery Mobilization and Front Line Combat”, which in turn claims priority to and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/501,971 filed on Jul. 13, 2009, and entitled “Integral Powered Wing Aircraft” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,950,603). The '971 application, in turn, is a divisional of and claims priority to application Ser. No. 11/521,597 filed on Sep. 14, 2006, and entitled “Integral Powered Wing Aircraft” (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,559,506). The '597 application, in turn, claims priority to provisional application Ser. No. 60/717,145 filed on Sep. 14, 2005, entitled “Integral Powered Wine Aircraft.” The contents of all the foregoing applications are fully incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61546141 | Oct 2011 | US | |
60717145 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11521597 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12501971 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13118509 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13650576 | US | |
Parent | 12501971 | Jul 2009 | US |
Child | 13118509 | US |