The present invention relates in general to new developments in dispensing bag-in-containers and, in particular, to the interface vents design which allows control of the pressure at the interface between an inner layer (the bag) and an outer layer (the container) of said bag-in-container, in order to separate the inner layer from the outer layer and collapse the inner bag. It also relates to a method for producing said bag-in-containers and, in particular, to preforms used for their production, as well as a method for producing said preform.
Bag-in-containers, also referred to as bag-in-bottles or bag-in-boxes depending on the geometry of the outer vessel, all terms considered herein as being comprised within the meaning of the term bag-in-container, are a family of liquid dispensing packaging consisting of an outer container comprising an opening to the atmosphere—the mouth—and which contains a collapsible inner bag joined to said container and opening to the atmosphere at the region of said mouth. The system must comprise at least one vent fluidly connecting the atmosphere to the region between the inner bag and the outer container in order to control the pressure in said region to squeeze the inner bag and thus dispense the liquid contained therein.
Traditionally, bag-in-containers were—and still are—produced by independently producing an inner bag provided with a specific neck closure assembly and a structural container (usually in the form of a bottle). The bag is inserted into the fully formed bottle opening and fixed thereto by means of the neck closure assembly, which comprises one opening to the interior of the bag and vents fluidly connecting the space between bag and bottle to the atmosphere; examples of such constructions can be found inter alia in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,484,011, 3,450,254, 4,330,066, and 4,892,230. These types of bag-in-containers have the advantage of being reusable, but they are very expensive and labour-intensive to produce.
More recent developments focused on the production of “integrally blow-moulded bag-in-containers” thus avoiding the labour-intensive step of assembling the bag into the container, by blow-moulding a polymeric multilayer preform into a container comprising an inner layer and an outer layer, such that the adhesion between the inner and the outer layers of the thus produced container is sufficiently weak to readily delaminate upon introduction of a gas at the interface. The “inner layer” and “outer layer” may each consist of a single layer or a plurality of layers, but can in any case readily be identified, at least upon delamination. Said technology involves many challenges and many alternative solutions were proposed.
The multilayer preform may be extruded or injection moulded (cf. U.S. Pat. No. 6,238,201, JPA10128833, JPA11010719, JPA9208688, U.S. Pat. No. 6,649,121). When the former method is advantageous in terms of productivity, the latter is preferable when wall thickness accuracy is required, typically in containers for dispensing beverage.
Preforms for the production of integrally blow-moulded bag-in-containers clearly differ from preforms for the production of blow-moulded co-layered containers, wherein the various layers of the container are not meant to delaminate, in the thickness of the layers. A bag-in-container is comprised of an outer structural envelope containing a flexible, collapsible bag. It follows that the outer layer of the container is substantially thicker than the inner bag. This same relationship can of course be found in the preform as well, which are characterized by an inner layer being substantially thinner than the outer layer. Moreover, in some cases, the preform already comprised vents which are never present in preforms for the production of co-layered containers (cf. EPA1356915).
One redundant problem with integrally blow-moulded bag-in-containers is the formation of the interface vents. Several solutions were proposed wherein the vent was formed after the bag-in-container was blow-moulded, as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,301,838, 5,407,629, JPA5213373, JPA8001761. This approach has of course the disadvantages that it involves an additional production step, and the danger of piercing the bag. Indeed these solutions have in common the formation of a hole normal to the outer container's wall and great accuracy is required not to degrade the inner layer's wall.
In EPA1356915 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,649,121, the preform is formed by injection moulding the outer layer first, followed by injection moulding the inner layer over the outer layer. During injection moulding of the layers, ventilation holes normal to the outer layer's wall are formed with protruding pins, which are flush with the inner surface of the thus obtained outer layer. The over-injected inner layer is not affected by the pins and this method solves the problem associated with the risk of damaging the inner bag during vents formation. The ventilation holes must be positioned close to the region of the container's mouth in an area of no or little stretching during the blow-moulding operation.
The venting holes described in EPA1356915 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,649,121, however, are not suitable for being connected to a source of pressurized gas to force delamination and squeezing of the inner bag. Furthermore, the inner and outer layers are little or not stretched in the region close to the container's mouth resulting in thicker and more rigid walls in this region than in the container's body. Consequently, a higher pressure would be required to delaminate the inner from the outer layers by blowing compressed air through the vents in a direction normal to the interface, as required in beg-in-containers for dispensing beverage like beer and sodas.
JPA10180853 discloses an integrally blow-moulded bag-in-container, wherein the preform consists of an assembly of an inner preform fitted into an outer preform such as to have a cavity transverse to the outer container's wall at a location very close to the preform assembly's mouth. Upon blow-moulding, said vent is maintained in the thus produced bag-in-container. It should be noted that the thickness of the preform's walls disclosed in JPA10180853 varies locally which can lead to serious processing and reproducibility problems of the final bag-in-container upon blow-moulding.
In order to optimize delamination of the inner and outer layers upon blowing pressurized gas into the vents, said vents should preferably run parallel to the interface between the two layers to provide a wedge effect. In the solutions proposed in the prior art relating to integrally blow-moulded bag-in-containers However, the vents run perpendicular to the interface and open to the atmosphere through a hole across, and normal to the outer container's wall, therefore providing no wedge effect and thus reducing the efficacy and reproducibility of the delamination of the inner bag from the outer container.
Bag-in-containers for beverage, like beer or sodas are usually positioned in a specially designed appliance comprising a dispensing passage to be connected to the mouth opening of the inner bag and a source of pressurized gas (generally air) to be connected to the vents opening(s). For reasons of compactness of the appliance, the vents design is restricted and should preferably open to the atmosphere at a location adjacent to the bag-in-container's mouth and oriented along the same axis as the latter, so as to allow all the piping to be bundled together. Such design follows the traditional beer keg interface in this regard, which is of course an advantage as it allows the replacement of a traditional keg by an integrally blow-moulded bag-in-container, without having to change the dispensing appliance.
It follows from the foregoing that there remains a need in the art for an integrally blow-moulded bag-in-container dispense package that allows optimization of the delamination of the inner bag from the outer container upon injection of a pressurized gas at the interface thereof and, at the same time, which can be used with the existing dispensing appliances.
The present invention is defined in the appended independent claims. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims. In particular the present invention relates to an integrally blow-moulded bag-in-container having an inner layer forming the bag and an outer layer forming the container, and a mouth fluidly connecting the volume defined by the bag to the atmosphere. The container further includes at least one interface vent fluidly connecting the interface between inner and outer layers to the atmosphere, wherein the at least one vent runs parallel to the interface between inner and outer layers and opens to the atmosphere at a location adjacent to, and oriented approximately coaxially with the bag-in-container's mouth.
The present invention also concerns a preform for blow-moulding the bag-in-container of the present invention. The preform includes an inner layer and an outer layer, and a body, a neck region, and a mouth fluidly connecting the space defined by the inner layer to the atmosphere, wherein the inner and outer layers are connected to one another by an interface at least at the level of the neck region. The preform includes at least one interface vent running parallel to the interface and opening to the atmosphere at a location adjacent to, and oriented coaxially with the preform's mouth.
The inner and outer layers of the preform (and consequently of the bag-in-container) of the present invention may consist of different or the same materials. The two layers of the preform may be connected by an interface throughout substantially the whole inner surface of the outer layer. Inversely, they may be separated over a substantial area of the preform's body by a gap containing air and which is in fluid communication with at least one interface vent. The preform may be an assembly of two separate inner and outer preforms or, alternatively, they may be an integral preform obtained by injection moulding one layer on top of the other.
The vent preferably is in the shape of a wedge with the broad side at the level of the opening thereof and getting thinner as it penetrates deeper into the vessel, until the two layers meet to form an interface. The container may comprise one or several vents evenly distributed around the lip of the bag-in-container's mouth.
One advantageous method to produce the bag-in-container of the present invention comprises the following steps:
A particularly preferred embodiment of the preform according to the present invention is an integral two layer preform which may be manufactured by a process comprising the following sequential steps:
Referring now to appended
The preform may consists of an assembly of two independent preforms (11) and (12) produced independently from one another and thereafter assembled such that the inner preform (11) fits into the outer preform (12). This solution allows for greater freedom in the design of the neck and vents, as well as in the choice of materials constituting each preform component. Alternatively, it can be an integral preform obtained by injection moulding one layer on top of the other. The latter embodiment is advantageous over the assembled preform in that it comprises no assembly step and one production station only is required for the preform fabrication. On the other hand, the design of the vents in particular is restricted and the respective melting temperatures of the inner and outer layers must be carefully matched depending on which layer is injected first; the rule of thumb being that the layer being injected first generally requires a higher melting temperature.
The inner and outer layers of the preform (1) may consist of different materials or the same material. In case different materials are used, some requirements must be fulfilled depending on the process parameters in the injection moulding of the preform as well as in the blow-moulding of the bag-in-container. It is important of course that both materials may be processed in a rather similar process window and that they will not form too strong an interface which would not satisfactorily release upon injecting pressurized gas at the interface.
Alternatively and surprisingly, good results can be obtained also with preforms wherein both inner and outer layers consist of the same material. The same polymer is considered in contact on either side of the interface between the inner and outer layers in the following cases:
Preferred materials for the preform and bag-in-container of the present invention are polyesters like PET, PEN, PTT, PTN; polyamides like PA6, PA66, PA11, PA12; polyolefins like PE, PP; EVOH; biodegradable polymers like polyglycol acetate (PGAc), polylactic acid (PLA); and copolymers and blends thereof. In case different materials are used for the inner and outer layers, their optimal blow-moulding temperatures should not differ from one another by more than about 70° C. preferably 40° C., most preferably 10° C., and ideally should have the same blow-moulding temperature. The layer's temperatures may be determined by IR-measurement.
The two layers (11) and (12) of the preform may be connected by an interface (14) throughout substantially the whole inner surface of the outer layer (cf. (1) in
A release agent may be applied at the interface on either or both surfaces of the inner and outer layer, which are to form the interface of the bag-in-container. In the case the outer layer is injection moulded onto the inner layer, the release agent can be applied at the outer surface of the inner layer prior to moulding the outer layer. Any release agents available on the market and best adapted to the material used for the preform and resisting the blowing temperatures, like silicon- or PTFE-based release agents (e.g., Freekote) may be used. The release agent may be applied just prior to loading the preforms into the blowmoulding unit, or the preforms may be supplied pretreated.
The application of a release agent is particularly beneficial with respect to the design of the inner layer. Indeed, lowering the interferential adhesive strength facilitates delamination of the inner layer from the outer layer and hence reduces stress exerted on the inner layer upon delamination, as such the inner layer can be designed very thin and flexible without risking that the inner layer is damaged upon delamination. Clearly, the flexibility of the inner bag is a key parameter for the liquid dispensing and moreover costs savings can be achieved in terms on material savings when the inner layer can be designed very thin.
The at least one vent (3) preferably is in the shape of a wedge with the broad side at the level of the opening (4) thereof and getting thinner as it penetrates deeper into the vessel, until the two layers meet to form an interface (14) at least at the level of the neck region. The container may comprise one or several vents evenly distributed around the lip of the bag-in-container's mouth. Several vents are advantageous as they permit the interface of the inner and outer layers (21) and (22) of the bag-in-container (2) to release more evenly upon blowing pressurized gas through said vents. Preferably, the preform comprises two vents opening at the vessel's mouth lip at diametrically opposed positions. More preferably, three, and most preferably, at least four vents open at regular intervals of the mouth lip.
The wedge shape of the vent is advantageous for the release of the interface but also for the production of an integral preform. A method for producing an integral preform suitable for blow-moulding a bag-in-container according to the present invention comprises the steps of:
The bag-in-container (2) of the present invention can be obtained by providing a preform as described above; bringing said preform to blow-moulding temperature; fixing the thus heated preform at the level of the neck region with fixing means in the blow-moulding tool; and blow-moulding the thus heated preform to form a bag-in-container. The inner and outer layers (21) and (22) of the thus obtained bag-in-container arm connected to one another by an interface (24) over substantially the whole of the inner surface of the outer layer. Said interface (24) is in fluid communication with the atmosphere through the vents (3), which maintained their original geometry through the blow-moulding process since the neck region of the preform where the vents are located is held firm by the fixing means and is not stretched substantially during blowing.
It is essential that the interface (24) between inner and outer layers (21) and (22) releases upon blowing pressurized gas through the vents in a consistent and reproducible manner. The success of said operation depends on a number of parameters, in particular, on the interfacial adhesive strength, the number, geometry, and distribution of the vents, and on the pressure of the gas injected. The interfacial strength is of course a key issue and can be modulated by the choice of materials for the inner and outer layers, and by the process parameters during blow-moulding. The pressure-time-temperature window used is of course of prime importance, but it has surprisingly been discovered that excellent results can be obtained if the blow-moulding process is carried out on a preform as described above, of the type wherein a gap containing air separates the inner and outer layers over a substantial area of the preform's body and wherein said gap is in fluid communication with at least one interface vent and wherein,
Alternatively or additionally, it is preferred to apply a (mechanical) pressure on the neck region of the inner layer in a direction as indicated by the arrows P in
A preform according to the present invention was produced by injecting a melt into a first mould cavity cooled at a temperature of T_mould ° C., to form the preform's inner layer (11). A melt was injected into a second mould cavity cooled to form the preform's outer layer (12). The two preform components were assembled to form a preform according to the present invention.
The preform produced as explained above was heated in an oven comprising an array of IRlamps and then fixed into a blow-moulding mould which walls were maintained at a desired temperature. Air was blown into the preform under pressure. The thus produced bag-in-container was then filled with a liquid and connected to an appliance for dispensing beverage comprising a source of compressed air in order to determine the delamination pressure.
The delamination pressure was determined as follows. The interface vents of said bag-in-container were connected to the source of compressed air. Air was injected through the vents at a constant pressure, and the interface between inner and outer layers was observed. The pressure was increased stepwise until delamination pressure was reached. Delamination pressure is defined as the pressure at which the inner bag separates from the outer layer over the whole of their interface and collapses. The surfaces of the thus separated layers were examined for traces of bonding.
The delamination pressure of the bag-in-container described above was of about 05±0.1 bar overpressure and showed little trace of cohesive fracture between the inner and outer layers. This example demonstrates that bag-in-containers of excellent quality can be produced with integral preforms according to the present invention.
This application is a continuation application of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/944,728, filed Jul. 31, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/944,728 is a continuation application of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/919,159, filed Mar. 12, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,664, and incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/919,159 is a continuation application of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/552,419, filed Nov. 24, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,919,841, and incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/552,419 is a divisional application of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/450,896, filed May 24, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,931,651, and incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/450,896 is the National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2008/054765, filed on Apr. 18, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/785,747, filed on Apr. 19, 2007, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2959812 | Allen | Nov 1960 | A |
3050773 | Hagen | Aug 1962 | A |
3285461 | Santelli | Nov 1966 | A |
3450254 | Miles | Jun 1969 | A |
3484011 | Greenhalgh et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3491918 | Lucas | Jan 1970 | A |
3632004 | Grimes et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3843005 | Uhlig | Oct 1974 | A |
3869056 | Valyi | Mar 1975 | A |
3878282 | Bonis et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3932104 | Schneider | Jan 1976 | A |
3940001 | Haefner et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3955697 | Valyi | May 1976 | A |
4013748 | Valyi | Mar 1977 | A |
4079850 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4092391 | Valyi | May 1978 | A |
4107362 | Valyi | Aug 1978 | A |
4147278 | Uhlig | Apr 1979 | A |
4170623 | Dubois et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4233010 | Suzuki | Nov 1980 | A |
4243725 | Wiggins et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4250078 | McFarlane | Feb 1981 | A |
4273246 | Thompson | Jun 1981 | A |
4280859 | Thompson | Jul 1981 | A |
4330066 | Berliner | May 1982 | A |
4339502 | Gerry et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4378328 | Przytulla et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4381277 | Nilsson | Apr 1983 | A |
4408004 | Pengilly | Oct 1983 | A |
4417753 | Bacehowski et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4454945 | Jabarin et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4459400 | Kuhfuss et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4476272 | Pengilly | Oct 1984 | A |
4510115 | Gokcen et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4529570 | Przytulla | Jul 1985 | A |
4609516 | Krishnakumar et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4646925 | Nohara | Mar 1987 | A |
4680208 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4696840 | McCullough et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4816093 | Robbins, III | Mar 1989 | A |
4818575 | Hirata et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4847129 | Collette et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4863665 | Schad et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4865224 | Streck | Sep 1989 | A |
4865234 | Folgero | Sep 1989 | A |
4875508 | Burke, II et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4892230 | Lynn, Jr. | Jan 1990 | A |
4933135 | Horwege et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4984713 | Chambers et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5012944 | Scheurenbrand et al. | May 1991 | A |
5012956 | Stoody | May 1991 | A |
5069363 | Daimler | Dec 1991 | A |
5197602 | Biesecker et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5219005 | Stoffel | Jun 1993 | A |
5242085 | Richter et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5301838 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5332121 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5344045 | Richter et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368195 | Pleet et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381927 | Richter et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5407629 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429702 | Grooms et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5433347 | Richter et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435452 | Nishigami et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447678 | Kneer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5464106 | Slat et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472753 | Farha | Dec 1995 | A |
5508076 | Bright | Apr 1996 | A |
5513761 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529744 | Tindale | Jun 1996 | A |
5567377 | Nishigami et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582788 | Collette et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5647930 | Bright | Jul 1997 | A |
5688570 | Ruttinger, Sr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5750216 | Horino et al. | May 1998 | A |
5780128 | Farha | Jul 1998 | A |
5799809 | Sako et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804016 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804305 | Slat et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819978 | Hlebovy | Oct 1998 | A |
5894041 | Cornell | Apr 1999 | A |
5908124 | Klauke et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912416 | Weisker | Jun 1999 | A |
5921416 | Uehara | Jul 1999 | A |
5921438 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925710 | Wu et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927525 | Darr et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
RE36410 | Meshberg | Nov 1999 | E |
5989482 | Sagawa | Nov 1999 | A |
6034167 | Tung et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039204 | Hosokoshiyama et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066287 | Brady et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068900 | Kohn et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083450 | Safian | Jul 2000 | A |
6136286 | Okuyama et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6195201 | Koch et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197851 | Maxwell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198793 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205847 | Nomoto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6238201 | Safian | May 2001 | B1 |
6254820 | Cornell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266943 | Nomoto et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276558 | Kneer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312641 | Hutchinson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332726 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6352426 | Hutchinson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359969 | Shmaenok | Mar 2002 | B1 |
H2018 | Giaimo et al. | Apr 2002 | H |
6438199 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467653 | Hamamoto et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499311 | Mahajan | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503440 | Kuehn et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6503586 | Wu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516839 | Timp et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521159 | Rashid et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6570168 | Schultz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6581803 | Yoshimoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602568 | Semersky | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6641881 | Darr | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645421 | Sanderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649121 | Hamamoto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6670007 | Safian et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676883 | Hutchinson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6722102 | Pape et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6749785 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6933055 | Share et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6981617 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7036690 | Tsubaki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7044334 | Mita et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055719 | Nomoto et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7114636 | Yoshimoto et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7188751 | Van Der Klaauw et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201291 | Vigny et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204950 | Farha et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7253422 | Smith | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277158 | Dierichs | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303387 | Hutchinson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7459119 | Ota et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7482047 | Tremley et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7614515 | Furusawa et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7816436 | Harrison et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837927 | Morel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8029718 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8118183 | Iwahashi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
9555572 | Van Hove et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9919841 | Van Hove et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10668659 | Van Hove et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10730664 | Van Hove et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10864671 | Van Hove et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20010040173 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022140 | Semersky | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020130139 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141071 | Singer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153386 | Uetake et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190079 | Hamamoto | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030031017 | Tsuji | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086524 | Schultz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095623 | Singer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040060889 | Yoneyama et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040061930 | Wedowski | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069735 | Yoneyama et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076782 | Safian et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086703 | Semersky | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112921 | Nomoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119961 | Singer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151937 | Hutchinson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159983 | Clougherty | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040187444 | Hutchinson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217128 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227922 | Dierichs et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239908 | Bleeker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257546 | Banine | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029337 | Van Handel | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103802 | Alberg | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115054 | Brandner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133578 | Farha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136201 | Farha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050270513 | Dierichs et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275818 | Singer | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060006586 | Farha et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060054635 | Iwahashi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065992 | Hutchinson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073294 | Hutchinson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078089 | Masaki et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091328 | Kanazawa | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119824 | Dierichs | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132747 | Singer et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138354 | Bakker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141189 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160031 | Wurm et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060257603 | Shi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070262092 | Tyski | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273853 | Bleeker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080100816 | Mulder et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080272154 | Maas et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080257846 | Hove et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257847 | Van Hove et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258353 | Hutchinson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258356 | Van Hove et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260978 | Van Hove et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090057347 | Leys et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090206524 | Laidler et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100239799 | Van Hove et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243596 | Van Hove et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252583 | Maas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110149200 | Joo | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120132607 | Landman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20150210420 | Hosokoshiyama | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102317051 | Jan 2012 | CN |
2115269 | Oct 1972 | DE |
69632354 | May 2005 | DE |
0118042 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0189750 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0161185 | Nov 1987 | EP |
189750 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0389191 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0346518 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0729819 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0759399 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0799683 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1048436 | Nov 2000 | EP |
0759399 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1167223 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1180424 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1048436 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1245499 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1356915 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1180424 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1547768 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1593605 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1167223 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1671776 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1482366 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1245499 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1593605 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2245954 | Nov 2010 | EP |
1356915 | Nov 2011 | EP |
1284918 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2148770 | Nov 2021 | EP |
2138685 | Jul 1973 | FR |
2676958 | Dec 1992 | FR |
2717783 | Sep 1995 | FR |
2866010 | Aug 2005 | FR |
1329257 | Sep 1973 | GB |
S4826027 | Apr 1973 | JP |
S57174221 | Oct 1982 | JP |
S60201909 | Oct 1985 | JP |
S61185417 | Aug 1986 | JP |
H02108516 | Apr 1990 | JP |
H04173134 | Jun 1992 | JP |
H04267727 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H0531791 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H05213373 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H0639906 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H06345069 | Dec 1994 | JP |
H071564 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H0748519 | Feb 1995 | JP |
H0748519 | Nov 1995 | JP |
H081761 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H08175568 | Jul 1996 | JP |
H09150830 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09208688 | Aug 1997 | JP |
H09208688 | Aug 1997 | JP |
H09308688 | Dec 1997 | JP |
H1010719 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H10500078 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H10128833 | May 1998 | JP |
H10180853 | Jul 1998 | JP |
H10338269 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H1110719 | Jan 1999 | JP |
H1177744 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000016469 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-62745 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000062745 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001001389 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001106218 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001179810 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002198309 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002313598 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004128449 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004149196 | May 2004 | JP |
3556344 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005047172 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005047538 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005075414 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006036250 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006165552 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006182389 | Jul 2006 | JP |
3935213 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007276790 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008254774 | Oct 2008 | JP |
4580524 | Nov 2010 | JP |
4586223 | Nov 2010 | JP |
WO2011010719 | Jan 2013 | JP |
20070012493 | Jan 2007 | KR |
20070119060 | Dec 2007 | KR |
100859229 | Sep 2008 | KR |
100921267 | Oct 2009 | KR |
2133699 | Jul 1999 | RU |
2346871 | Feb 2009 | RU |
82470 | Apr 2008 | UA |
WO1990007414 | Jul 1990 | WO |
WO1990007555 | Jul 1990 | WO |
WO19990003668 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9108099 | Jun 1991 | WO |
WO19910008099 | Jun 1991 | WO |
WO 9112926 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO19910012926 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9211187 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO19920011187 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO19980013292 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO1999003668 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO19990011561 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO1999033634 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO2000003944 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0185420 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO20030037725 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2004060748 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004106426 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2006124199 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007039158 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007039158 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2006107099 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008129016 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009041809 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009088285 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO2009154446 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2009074285 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2010044659 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010014004 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2014077681 | May 2014 | WO |
WO2014077681 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Avery, Jack, “Gas-Assist Injection Molding,” chapter 1, pp. 1-29, Hanser-Gardner Publications, 2001. |
Berger Kenneth R., reviewed by B. Welt, A Brief History of Packaging, (ABE321) Agricultural and Biological = Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication, Dec. 2002, Reviewed Dec. 2005, http://edis.ifas.ufl. edu, 5 pages. Heineken Ex. 1016. |
Charles A. Harper, Handbook of Plastic Processes, 2006, 90 pages, Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication. Heiniken Ex. 1028. |
Leaversuch, R.,“Barrier PET Bottles,” Plastics Technology, Mar. 2003, web: http://www.ptonline.com/articles/barrier-pet-bottles. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action dated Sep. 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,896, now Patented. |
Injection Molding, Blow Molding, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, 75 pages, vols. 1 and 3, Copyright John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Anheuser-Busch InBev Exhibit 2010. |
In the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patents Court, Ground of Invalidity (EP 770), Oct. 9, 2018, 6 pages. |
Clariant, Masterbatches for Thermoplastic Polyester, accessed Nov. 7, 2019. Heineken Ex. 1041. Date of Publication Currently Unknown According to Heiniken Prior Art Notice (ITC 337-TA-1115). |
Standard PET preforms & specific developments, PET preforms, 2016, 5 pages, www.pdg-plastiques.com. Heiniken Ex. 1031. Date of Publication Currently Unknown According to Heiniken Prior Art Notice (ITC 337-TA-1115). |
Online article, “Co-molding—Overmolding—Plastopia,” https://www.plastopialtd.com/co-molding/, Plastopia Molding Limited 2015-2021. |
Online article, “Injection Overmolding—Plastopia,” https://www.plastopialtd.com/overmolding/, Plastopia Molding Limited 2015-2021. |
Bag-in-a-box (BiB)—Diffpack, Aug. 27, 2018, 7 pages, http://www_diffpack.com/bag-box-bb/. Heineken Ex_ 1020_ Date of Publication Currently Unknown According to Heiniken Prior Art Notice (ITC 337-TA-1115). |
Wiley, John & Sons, “Processing and finishing of Polymeric Materials,” vol. 2, p. 221 (2011) ISBN 978-0-470-88917-6. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,746, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,408, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jul. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/954,556, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jul. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,098, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 26, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 7, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,313, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated May 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,745, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Nov. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 1, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/944,728 Final Rejection Mailed. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 3, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/853,597, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,904, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,745, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,365, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,896, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 22, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,408, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 27, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Apr. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,750, now Abandoned. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Aug. 7, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Jun. 17, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,748, now Abandoned. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated May 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,747, now Abandoned. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election dated May 30, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,896, now Patented. |
Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 18, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/954,556, now Abandoned. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 25, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,189, now Abandoned. |
Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 5, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Richard Coles, Derek Mcdowell, Mark J. Kirwan, Food Packaging Technology, 2003, 262 pages, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Heineken Ex. 1017. |
Wikipedia article, “Crystallization of polymers,” last edited on May 18, 2018, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crystalization_of_polymers&oldid=841776901. |
Article, “Recycling,” section 4.9, in “Plastics and the Environment,” Anthony L. Andrady, ed., published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2003, pp. 163-166. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,745, now Abandoned. |
Advisory Action dated Aug. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,896, now Patented. |
Advisory Action dated Aug. 20, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,904, now Patented. |
Advisory Action dated Dec. 1, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Advisory Action dated Jul. 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Advisory Action dated Jul. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/954,556, now Abandoned. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 22, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Advisory Action dated Sep. 16, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated May 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Sep. 6, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated May 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,904, now Patented. |
First Action Interview Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/051,610, now Patented. |
Henk Albers declaration—Opposition of EP1. |
Charles A. Harper, Handbook of Plastic Processes, 2006, 196 pages, Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication. Anheuser-Busch InBev Exhibit 2009. |
Dutch speaking court of commerce judgement. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action dated Sep. 9, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,904, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated May 13, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,896, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Mar. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,392, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Mar. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Jun. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Jul. 26, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Jul. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Apr. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/853,597, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Mar. 25, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/944,728 Final Rejection Mailed. |
Final Rejection dated May 15, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/582,780, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Oct. 20, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,744, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Sep. 3, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,098, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Apr. 11, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Apr. 16, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,745, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Apr. 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Apr. 23, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Final Rejection dated Dec. 4, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,745, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Dec. 19, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,313, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Feb. 2, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/954,556, now Abandoned. |
Final Rejection dated Jan. 16, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,189, now Abandoned. |
I Hwa Lee, Bonding “Unjoinable” Polymers, DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers, 2011, packaging.dupont.com, 7 pages. Heiniken Ex. 1029. |
In the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patents Court, Particulars of Claim, Oct. 9, 2018, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/NL2008/050225 dated Sep. 22, 2008. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-504004, dated Nov. 2, 2011. |
John Bozzelli, What to Do About Weak Weld Lines: Plastics Technology, Apr. 1, 2008, 5 pages, https://www.ptonline.com/articles/what-to-do-about-weak-weld-lines. Heiniken Ex. 1030. |
Misko, George G., The Regulation of Packaging by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau: An Added Level of Complexity, Apr. 10, 2008, 6 pages, www.packaginglaw.com. Heiniken Ex. 1022. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,343, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 13, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,744, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 4, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/887,189, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 5, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,365, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 7, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,426, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/919,159, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 30, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/889,566, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Dec. 19, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/582,780, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Dec. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,721, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Dec. 2, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,896, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 12, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,893, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 3, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/785,749, now Abandoned. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,904, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 13, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,892, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 25, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,419, now Patented. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/450,895, now Patented. |
Connor, M. et al., “A criterion for optimum adhesion applied to fibre reinforced composites,” 32 Journal of Material Science 5059-67 (1997). |
Dr. Ulrich K. Thiele, Polyester Bottle Resins, Production Processing, Properties and Recycling, 2007, 16 pages, Impressum, PETplanet print vol. 5. Heiniken Ex. 1035. |
Giles, Geoff A., Handbook of Beverage Packaging, Sheffield Food Technology, 1999, 20 pages, Sheffield Academic Press Ltd. Heiniken Ex. 1019.\. |
Multilayered blow molded container used for carbonated beverages, comprises resin made outer and inner layers, which are separable. |
Norman Lee, Plastic Blow Molding Handbook, Society of Plastic Engineers and its Blow Molding Division, 1990, 18 pages, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY. Heiniken Ex. 1032. |
Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc., Transparent IR Absorbers and Antistatic Additives, Nyacol Applications, Aug. 27, 2018, 3 pages, http://www nyacol.com/application/it--absorbers-antistatic—additives/. Heiniken Ex. 1039. Date of Publication Currently Unknown According to Heiniken Prior Art Notice (ITC 337-TA-1115). |
Omnexus by SpecialChem, The Universal Selection Source: Plastics & Elastomers, Thermoplastics Polyester PET, Aug. 23, 2018, 19 pages, https://omnexus.specialchem.com/selectors/c-thermoplastics-polyester-pet. Heiniken Ex. 1036. Date of Publication Currently Unknown According to Heiniken Prior Art Notice (ITC 337-TA-1115). |
Sanchez-Valdes, S. et al., Polymer Engineering and Science, Jan. 1998, No. 1, 150-55. |
Machine English translation of JP 10-180853. |
Banine V. et al, “The relationship between an EUV source and the performance of an EUV lithographic system”, Proceedings of SPIE, 20000101 IEEE, US, vol. 3997,pp. 126-135. XP002493691. |
David W. Brooks and Geoff A. Giles, PET Packaging Technology, 2002, 390 pages, Scheffield Packaging Technology, Scheffield Academic Press Ltd. Heiniken Ex. 1018. |
Du et al., Polymer Engineering and Science, 2010, 1111-21. |
Dynamic mechanical analysis of PET, Thermal Analysis Application No. HB 238, Dec. 2009, 3 pages, Mettler-Toledo TA Application Handbook Thermoplastics. Heiniken Ex. 1037. |
Fried, Joel R., Polymer Science & Technology (second edition), Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 2003, 32 pages, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458, www.phptr.com. Heiniken Ex. 1034. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220315287 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12450896 | US | |
Child | 14552419 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16944728 | Jul 2020 | US |
Child | 17848321 | US | |
Parent | 15919159 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16944728 | US | |
Parent | 14552419 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15919159 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11785747 | Apr 2007 | US |
Child | 12450896 | US |