Integrated Automated Filtration for Separation, Washing and Drying of Peptide Crystals

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20200223886
  • Publication Number
    20200223886
  • Date Filed
    September 19, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Published
    July 16, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The present invention describes the integration of preparative crystallization, crystal separation, crystal washing and freeze-drying processes into single continuous process using pressure filtration. The process facilitates time reduction, and outlines the novel design of using multiple organic solvent washes and nitrogen gas purging for the removal of imbibed water and achieve final drug substance that meets the quality specifications.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

Present invention relates to downstream processing of biologics, more specifically, to downstream processing of Insulin and its analogues. Present invention further relates to integration of crystal separation, followed by crystal washing and freeze-drying into a single continuous process for purification of insulin and its analogues.


BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Traditionally, preparative protein crystallization involves a series of washing (of the settled crystals) and gravity settling steps. The end product of preparative protein crystallization is further processed by vacuum assisted freeze-drying to obtain the drug substance (DS) in dry powder form. The resultant drug substance must conform to purity by residual substance (RS) analysis, moisture content (LOD-Loss on Drying), sulphated ash content (ROI) and residual solvent limits as per universal quality and regulatory specifications. The entire process of preparative crystallization, settling of the crystals in the tank and washing to meet the desired quality requirements and freeze-drying requires a minimum of 7 days at commercial scale. Evidently, the discontinuous and modular nature of this process makes it energy, cost and time intensive.


Methods of crystallization and purification of insulin or insulin analogs have been disclosed in WO2015084694, U.S. Pat. No. 8,769,841, WO1996040730, CN103512318 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,408,536.


WO2015084694 describes a method for crystallizing insulin or insulin analogues under alkaline conditions and purifying the crystals by filtering through a filter and drying the crystals captured on the filter to produce crystalline insulin or insulin analogue crystal compositions. After crystallization, the entire volume of decanted crystal suspension is then transferred to a filter apparatus. The filter apparatus described in WO2015084694 is an agitated Nutsche filter, which have a stainless steel screen with a pore size about 5 μm.


U.S. Pat. No. 8,769,841 discloses a process of freeze drying of an essentially aqueous solution comprising at least one first step having a first temperature and pressure level (i.e. primary drying phase) and at least one second step having a second temperature and pressure level following the first step (i.e. secondary drying phase).


WO1996040730 disclose a method for recovering an acylated protein, those that resist recovery by precipitation or crystallization and subsequent filtration from aqueous solutions, as a powder. Acylated proteins are certain acylated proinsulins, insulins and insulin analogues. The method comprises of combination adjusting the aqueous solution to near the isoelectric pH of the protein and providing a suitable alcohol concentration to cause precipitation of the protein in the form of filterable particles at the adjusted pH.


CN103512318 disclose a drug purification drying process that relates to a lyophilized processing of insulin wherein the process discloses a freeze-drying process for insulin. The impurity content is lower than conventional technology. This process avoids the use of organic solvents, eliminating the potential adverse effects on people and the environment, and saying the drying time of 2-3 days and improve industrial productivity.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,408,536 disclose a process for drying protein crystals from an aqueous protein crystal suspension. The process comprises of filtering off the crystals from an aqueous suspension, washing the filter cake, spin-drying the same, drying the crystals in the fluidized bed with a stream of moistened nitrogen and emptying the dried crystals using a nitrogen pressure surge into a flanged container.


Though several methods are available for crystallizing insulin and its analogues, there is a need to develop an alternative method to have simple and optimized process of crystallization, washing and separation of the crystal as well as drying the same which can be practised in the industry in a bigger scale equipment which works on the same principle.


The present invention offers an integrated simple process for separation and drying of insulin and its analogues.


OBJECT OF INVENTION

The object of present invention is to integrate the discrete processes of crystallization, washing of the crystals and freeze-drying into a single continuous process using pressure filtration while achieving comparable standards of critical quality attributes and process performance attributes.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention describes the integration of preparative Insulin and Insulin analogues crystallization, crystal separation and freeze-drying processes into single continuous process using pressure filtration. The process facilitates time reduction, and outlines the novel design of using multiple organic solvent washes and nitrogen gas purging for the removal of imbibed water and achieve final drug substance that meets the major quality specifications.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 represents flowchart of process of pressure filtration for insulin and insulin analogues purification



FIG. 2 represents representative image of lab scale pressure-filter



FIG. 3 represents drug substance from conventional (left) and new (right) process



FIG. 4 represents variability chart for Product loss/recovery as Loss %



FIG. 5 represents variability chart for residual moisture content in Drug Substance as LOD (loss on drying) %



FIG. 6 represents variability chart for High Molecular Weight Products (HMWP) %



FIG. 7 represents variance chart for Purity %





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
Definitions

The term ‘crystal suspension’ refer to a volume of solution prepared by addition of Zinc Chloride (ZnCl2) to insulin or insulin analogue followed by pH adjustment in the range of 4.5-8.5 using acid/alkali. Addition of zinc improves the physical stability of insulin by multimerization.


The term ‘filter’ refer to a simple set up that is similar to a ‘Buchner funnel’ with the pore size of filter membrane used varying between ‘1-15 μm’ which does not involve any centrifugal force. The term ‘pressure filtration’ refer to a solid-liquid filtration aided by controlled pressure that pushes the solution against a filter membrane so that the solid substance (crystalline insulin and insulin analogue) is retained as a cake while the (organic solvent) mother liquor passes through as permeate. This exogenous pressure results in increased effective flow rate, high pressure gradient across the membrane and use of inert gas ensures stability to the finished product. Pressure filtration is an instantaneous process with an operating time of between 2-5 minutes on a lab scale and 45-60 minutes on an industrial scale.


The term ‘insulin’ or ‘insulin analogue’ refer to 51 amino acid peptide hormone used for treatment of diabetes. It also refers to other insulin related forms such as insulin precursor or insulin analogue precursor, intermediate insulin or insulin analogue molecules obtained during downstream processes.


DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

Insulin and insulin analogues were expressed extracellularly using a recombinant Pichia based fermentation process. Transformed Pichia pastoris yeast strain are fermented in culture medium. The secreted Insulin or Insulin analogues were recovered by method of chromatography.


Insulin and insulin analogue was crystallized from the chromatography elution pool. It was further made into crystal suspension in presence of Zinc Chloride (ZnCl2) and at an appropriate pH (in the range of 4.5 to 8.5) by addition of acid or alkali. Profile of crystal suspension (percentage solids, purity) was determined. The resultant insulin or insulin analogue crystals had high purity. Entire volume of crystal suspension was washed with water to remove the free precipitant used for crystallization and was taken forward for further processing of freeze drying.


The crystal suspension was first processed for separation through pressure filtration process to obtain the dried cake. This separation process is devoid of gravity and centrifugal force. The dried cake had imbibed water, which is removed by steps of washing by organic solvent and purging nitrogen gas through it.


The single continuous process can be depicted in following four steps.

    • 1. Pressure Filtration of crystal suspension (initial separation of crystals)
    • 2. Drying: washing with organic solvents for displacement of imbibed water
    • 3. Drying: final purge of nitrogen to remove residual organic solvents
    • 4. Automatic dispensing of dried powder in a cGMP environment.


Similar integration of crystal separation, washing and drying can be performed at multiple preceding crystallization step during the downstream processing of insulin and insulin analogues. The raw material(s), reagent(s) and equipment(s) were used as per listed below in table 1, 2 and 3 respectively.









TABLE 1







list of raw material










Sr. No.
Raw Materials
Grade
Manufacturer













1.
Acetic acid
HPLC
Rankem


2.
Acetonitrile (ACN)
HPLC
Rankem


3.
Acetonitrile (ACN)
Commercial Grade
ASAHI KASEI


4.
L-Arginine
Reagent grade
Sigma-Aldrich


5.
1-butanol
Commercial Grade
Deepak fertilizers


6.
Ethanol
Commercial Grade
Changshu Yangyuan





Chemicals


7.
Ethyl acetate
Commercial Grade
Lakshmi Organic





Industries


8.
Filter membrane
Not Applicable
Sefar Filtration





(India) Pvt. Ltd


9.
HCl
ACS Reagent
Sigma-Aldrich


10.
Methanol
Commercial Grade
Deepak fertilizers


11.
2-propanol
Commercial Grade
Deepak fertilizers


12.
Trifluoroacetic acid
Chromasolv
Sigma-Aldrich


13.
Water for injection
Not Applicable
Biocon
















TABLE 2







list of buffer/reagents and preparation









Sr. No.
Buffers/Reagents
Preparation












1.
0.1% TFA in MilliQ
Measure 1000 mL of MilliQ water.



water
Pipette out 1 mL of water




and add 1 mL of HPLC grade TFA.


2.
1N HCl
Measure 70 mL of water and then




add 8.212 mL of concentrated HCl (HPLC




grade). Make up the final volume to




100 mL using MilliQ water in a




volumetric flask.


3.
0.01N HCl
Measure 245 mL of water. Add 2.5 mL




of 1N HCl (HPLC grade). Make up the




volume to 250 mL with MilliQ water.


4.
HMWP buffer
Measure 600 mL of milliQ water.



(High Molecular
Add 0.65 g of Reagent grade



Weight Transfer
L-Arginine while on stirring.



buffer)
Make up the volume to 650 mL.




Add 150 mL of Acetic acid and




200 mL of ACN. Filter the




solution using a 0.45 μm




followed by 0.2 μm filter and




sonicate for 20 minutes.
















TABLE 3







List of equipment/instruments









Sr. No.
Name
Model/Make












1.
Analytical HPLC
Agilent HPLC- 1200/Agilent technologies




Agilent HPLC- 1100/Agilent technologies




LC-2010CHT/Shimadzu


2.
Column
Advanced Chromatography Technologies:




ACE 300-C18, 5 μm; 4.6 × 250 mm




Waters: Insulin HMWP 7.8 × 300 mm


3.
Pressure filter
Prototype from BHS Sonthofen


4.
Vacuum oven
Servewell


5.
Weighing balance
Mettler Toledo


6.
Water bath
Julabo


7.
Water bath
Equitron


8.
Sonicator
Servewell


9.
Vortexer
Shalom


10.
Nitrogen Gas
Biocon



cylinder


11.
Cold room
Blue star


12.
Deep freezer
Vestfrost









The trials were performed in a lab scale pressure filter set up with an approximate filter cross-sectional area of 80 cm2 to 100 cm2. It also comprises of a pressure inlet for compressed inert gas (Nitrogen), a pressure gauge and safety release valve, sample inlet and outlet ports and a water jacket (FIG. 2).


Variable parameters were wash solvent, solvent volume, number of washes, time of nitrogen purging for each wash and an optional change of filter media, which is dependent on the size of crystals being processed. Process performance and quality attributes of the obtained drug substance were measured by analysing percentage of loss of crystals in permeate and loss on drying (LOD), purity and molecular weight (HMWP). The temperature of the set up was maintained in range of 25° C. to 35° C.


The cake formed by process of pressure filtration of insulin and insulin analogue crystal suspension, had requisite thickness and texture. However, the goal was to dry the cake to achieve acceptable standards of LOD and very importantly to integrate the crystallization-freeze drying of the conventional process into a single continuous process. To achieve sufficient displacement of imbibed residual water from filter cake, single or multiple wash strategies with different organic solvents were studied. The wash steps were also designed to enable effective removal of precipitants, and residual solvents that are present in reverse phase (chromatography) elution pool and obtain a drug substance that complies with the universal quality and regulatory specifications.


The assembly of instrument(s) for achieving the dried powder in continuous and automated manner was as follows:

    • i. The equipment was an SS cylindrical assemblage with jacketing to maintain required internal temperature as well as provision for passing an (inert) gas. Nitrogen gas cylinder and Julabo water chiller were used for these trials. The temperature was maintained in the range of 25-35° C.
    • ii. A filter fabric of 80 cm2 to 100 cm2 area was placed on an SS mesh support and housed in the assemblage. Fabric filter was selected from PET 1703 (Poly ester fabric) and SK-011 (Poly propylene fabric).
    • iii. The assemblage was sealed with a SS disc lined with silicon gasket, and clamps were fastened to make the compartment airtight, followed by pouring the homogenous neat suspension from the top of the vessel to commence pressure filtration.
    • iv. Nitrogen gas at bar pressure in the range of 1 bar to 2.5 was applied via NRV/inlet port.
    • v. Filtrate/permeate was collected via the sample outlet port at the bottom.
    • vi. Steps ‘iii’ and ‘iv’ were repeated for single or multiple cake washes using organic solvent.
    • vii. Drying was performed by addition of an organic solvent and further passing N2 gas for about three minutes after which the assemblage was unfastened.
    • viii. The fabric containing the cake was carefully removed and gently tapped to recover the cake which was then transferred into a sterile airtight amber colour container and stored at −20° C. until further analysis.


Two trials were conducted. First, was preliminary screening (Trial I) and second (Trail II) was design of experiment (DOE).


Preliminary screening trials (trial 1) were performed in a lab scale prototype of industrial pressure filter (FIG. 2) with different organic solvents using the design described in Table 4. In preferable embodiment, acetonitrile was considered best working organic solvent. Filter fabrics were studied and screened for their pore size, i.e. retention of crystals, texture, workability on commercial scale and resilience/inertness to the pH and temperature conditions of the process. Two types of filter fabric were used viz. poly ester fabric and poly propylene fabric. Organic solvents were chosen based on their ability to displace water from the cake and their volatile nature (table 4). The FDA guidelines to acceptable solvents and their residual limits in final drug substance were also considered for the selection of solvents.









TABLE 4







Solvent screening design












% Solvent volume based



Trial

on crystal suspension


number
Solvent
volume
Washes













1.
Acetonitrile (ACN)
5
1


2.

5
2


3.

10
1


4.
Butanol
5
1


5.

5
2


6.

10
1


7.
Ethanol
5
1


8.

5
2


9.

10
1


10.
Ethyl acetate
5
1


11.

5
2


12.

10
1


13.
Isopropanol
5
1


14.

5
2


15.

10
1


16.
Water
5
1


17.

5
2


18.

10
1









Solvents and wash combinations yielding high percentage LOD (loss on drying) values in the above design were eliminated. Data set is presented in table 5 and table 6.


The captured data set in table 5 and table 6 suggested that the resultant insulin and insulin analogue drug substance has comparable quality attributes to the drug substance made from traditional crystallization-freeze drying process with optimal recovery of product (FIG. 3).


Two washes of acetonitrile planned in Trail I has satisfactory outcome with respect to percentage LOD. However, to fall in-line with regulatory requirements a further reduction in LOD was desired. Parameters that were studied in this experimental setup included a) number of washes; b) drying time and c) temperature during filtration to study the probability of temperature accelerating the evaporation of the residual organic solvent trapped in filter cake. For Trail II (DOE), HMWP was also determined.









TABLE 5







Solvent Screening Result











Crystallization 3 Neat
















suspension (NS)
Wash 1 (W1)
Wash 2 (W2)





















NS
NS
NS
W1
W1
W2
W2
Drying
DS




conc.
volume
permeate
volume
permeate
volume
permeate
time
weight



Wash Solvent %
(g/L)
(mL)
(mL)
(mL)
(mL)
(mL)
(mL)
(min)
(g)
LOD %





16 Jan. 2017












LP1-5%-W1
14.65
300
285
15
21
NAP
NAP
1.5
5.52
26


LP1 5% W 1 & 2
14.65
300
290
15
13
15
17.5
1.5
5.26
20.46


LB1-5%-W1
14.65
300
280
15
18
NAP
NAP
1.5
6.33
35.14


LB1-5%-W 1 & 2
14.65
300
290
15
13.5
15
20
2.5
5.88
36.22


LA-5%-W1
14.65
300
290
15
14.3
NAP
NAP
1.5
4.96
15.99


LA-5%-W 1 & 2
14.65
300
295
15
12.5
15
13.5
1.5
4.88
9.34


LA-10%-W1
14.65
300
290
30
29
NAP
NAP
2
5.3
21.25


LP1-10%-W1
14.65
300
290
30
31.5
NAP
NAP
2
5.43
21.14


LB1-10%-W 1
14.65
290
275
30
30
NAP
NAP
2
5.5
25.1


LP1-5%-W1
14.65
200
190
10
9.7
NAP
NAP
1.5
3.81
NAV


19 Jan. 2017












LE-5%-W 1 & 2
14.65
300
290
15
9.8
15
18
2
5.66
22.35


LEA-5%-W1
14.65
300
290
15
21.5
NAP
NAP
2
7.07
37.84


LEA-5%-W 1 & 2
14.65
300
290
15
9
15
9.6
2
6.67
34.11


LEA 10% W1 & 2
14.65
300
280
30
25 5
30
28
2
6.87
36.03


LE-5%-W 1 & 2 T1
14.65
300
290
15
18.5
15
16
2
5.44
15.75


LE-5%-W 1 & 2 T2
14.65
300
285
15
13
15
16.5
2
6.06
16.43


LA-5%-W 1 & 2 T1
14.65
300
300
15
15
15
14
2
5.38
10.52


LA-5%-W 1 & 2 T2
14.65
300
305
15
10
15
9.5
2
5.7
11.53





LOD values in BOLD are actual values, rest are theoretical values based on neat suspension product concentration.


LA: Acetonitrile, LP1: Isopropanol, LB1: Butanol, LEA: Ethyl acetate, NS: Neat suspension, W1/2; Wash 1 and Wash 2, T1/2; Trial 1 and Trial 2; LOD: Loss on drying; NAP: Not applicable, NAV: Not available






A full factorial experimental design along with the response data is presented in table 6. Fifty experiments were performed discretely as below (table 6).









TABLE 6







Experimental design with response data




















Drying
Drying






Sr.
Wash I
Wash II
Wash III
Temp
Time
%
%
%
%


No.
(% V/V)
(% V/V)
(% V/V)
(° C)
(min)
LOD
Purity
HMWP
Loss



















1
5
10
5
35
3
19.18
99.20
0.158
1.41


2
10
10
0
35
2
22.23
99.25
0.163
1.89


3
10
5
10
35
2
17.66
99.18
0.159
4.50


4
10
10
5
35
3
16.38
99.22
0.162
1.59


5
10
10
10
25
2
12.77
99.06
0.167
0.19


6
5
5
0
25
2
18.70
98.86
0.173
0.49


7
7.5
7.5
5
30
2.5
13.90
99.25
0.156
1.58


8
10
10
10
35
3
16.37
99.24
0.165
1.54


9
5
10
10
35
3
13.06
99.17
0.158
2.62


10
5
10
10
25
2
14.60
98.72
0.162
0.17


11
5
5
10
25
2
11.99
99.00
0.163
0.24


12
10
10
5
25
2
9.14
98.71
0.158
0.13


13
10
10
5
35
2
13.25
99.26
0.164
3.25


14
5
5
0
35
2
14.01
99.35
0.225
0.23


15
10
5
5
35
3
21.74
99.11
0.218
1.11


16
5
5
5
25
3
15.66
98.89
0.171
0.31


17
10
5
5
25
3
14.60
99.19
0.164
0.25


18
10
5
0
25
3
20.36
99.06
0.169
0.18


19
10
10
0
35
3
16.58
99.20
0.172
1.78


20
5
5
0
25
3
12.13
98.95
0.176
0.34


21
5
5
10
25
3
14.58
98.84
0.181
0.33


22
10
10
10
35
2
14.47
99.22
0.152
1.78


23
10
5
10
25
3
9.56
99.04
0.164
0.15


24
10
10
0
25
2
15.70
99.03
0.158
0.16


25
5
10
0
25
3
15.35
98.97
0.164
0.19


26
10
5
5
35
2
15.54
99.18
0.157
1.99


27
5
10
0
35
3
16.10
99.37
0.159
2.61


28
5
10
0
35
2
12.93
99.19
0.157
1.66


29
10
10
0
25
3
12.66
99.06
0.165
0.18


30
5
5
10
35
2
18.12
99.20
0.160
1.42


31
5
5
0
35
3
15.35
99.27
0.159
5.10


32
10
5
5
25
2
16.88
99.05
0.166
0.28


33
5
5
5
25
2
17.11
98.53
0.170
0.30


34
10
10
10
25
3
9.33
99.14
0.166
0.28


35
10
5
10
25
2
20.35
98.73
0.162
0.22


36
5
10
5
35
2
13.63
99.19
0.161
2.02


37
10
5
0
35
2
18.68
99.35
0.159
1.57


18
10
5
0
25
2
23.54
99.13
0.164
0.16


39
5
5
5
35
3
17.18
99.19
0.158
1.83


40
5
10
10
25
3
15.21
99.08
0.169
0.24


41
5
10
5
25
2
13.80
98.85
0.165
0.27


42
5
10
5
25
3
11.79
99.08
0.168
0.25


43
10
5
10
35
3
18.13
99.25
0.157
1.87


44
5
10
10
35
2
17.66
99.20
0.158
1.39


45
5
10
0
25
2
15.81
98.92
0.171
0.33


46
5
5
10
35
3
19.76
99.21
0.161
1.60


47
7.5
7.5
5
30
2.5
13.81
99.23
0.159
1.32


48
10
10
5
25
3
12.42
99.15
0.162
0.16


49
10
5
0
35
3
20.44
99.22
0.158
5.33


50
5
5
5
35
2
13.68
99.25
0.225
0.83









The drug, substance from Trials 12, 23 and 34 had the lowest LOD values i.e. of less than 10% (table 7), while drug substance from trials 11 and 42 had LOD values less than 12%. There were no significant changes in purity and HMWP profiles, and per-step losses were found to be well within range.


The results of variability are also represented in FIGS. 4, 5, 6 and 7 for percentage loss of product, percentage LOD, percentage HMWP and percentage purity respectively,









TABLE 7







Summary of results of DOE (Trial II)









Trial
WASHES (% V/V)












number
W I
W II
W III
% LOD














12
10
10
5
9.14


23
10
5
10
9.56


34
10
10
10
9.33









From the multivariate studies, it was found out that more number of washes with organic solvent (3>2>1) resulted in ample displacement of imbibed water from filter cake. Three washes including wash 1 at 10%, wash 2 at 5% or 10% and wash 3 at 5% or 10%, were found to be most effective in reducing LOD. Volume of washes can be fine-tuned further as per process requirements. Increased drying time helped in forcing out some solvent imbibed in the cake post-washing. Increasing the temperature during filtration did not reduce the LOD of the drug substance, but it did not significantly affect the profile of the drug substance either. Thus, the temperature was maintained in the range of 25° to 35° C. Based on this multivariate study further trials can be designed and executed to further reduce the LOD to <4%.


The results of this multivariate study were satisfactory and drew immediate attention to a novel process that is shorter, continuous, less resource intensive and automated.

Claims
  • 1. A single continuous process of insulin or insulin analogues crystal separation, washing and drying aided by pressure filtration comprising the below steps: a) Preparing crystal suspension of insulin and insulin analogues using ZnCl2 and pH adjustment between 4.5 and 8.5;b) Pouring the suspension obtained from step a) on filter fabric placed on area ranging between 80 cm2 to 100 cm2 of pressure filtration unit;c) Purging nitrogen gas via inlet port of pressure filtration unit;d) Collecting filtrate via outlet port of pressure filtration unit;e) Repetition of Steps ‘b’ and ‘c’ for multiple cake washes using 100% organic solvent;f) Drying by passing nitrogen gas at a pressure range of 1 bar to 2.5 bar;g) Removal of dried cake in form of dried powder.
  • 2. The single continuous process of claim 1, wherein insulin or insulin analogues have crystal size in the range of 1-40 μm.
  • 3. The single continuous process of claim 1, wherein the temperature inside the assemblage is maintained in the range of 25° to 35° C.
  • 4. The single continuous process of claim 1, wherein pressure filtration unit has filter membrane with pore size in the range of 1-15 μm.
  • 5. The single continuous process of claim 1, wherein the single continuous pressure filtration process of crystallization of insulin or insulin analogues is completed within 5 to 10 minutes
  • 6. The single continuous process of claim 1, wherein the fabric filter is placed on SS mesh support of pressure filtration unit.
  • 7. The single continuous process of claim 5, wherein the fabric filter is selected from poly ester fabric and poly propylene fabric
  • 8. The single continuous process of claim 1, wherein the 100% organic solvent is selected from acetonitrile, butanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate and isopropanol.
  • 9. The process of claims 1 and 9 wherein the volume of 100% organic solvent is 5-10% of the volume of crystal suspension.
  • 10. The process of claim 9, wherein preferable 100% organic solvent is acetonitrile.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
201741034158 Sep 2017 IN national
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application is a U.S. National Stage Entry of International Application No. PCT/IB2018/057204, filed Sep. 19, 2018, which claims priority to IN Application No. 201741034158, filed Sep. 26, 2017, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2018/057204 9/19/2018 WO 00