The present invention relates to the general field of highway guardrail systems and roadside safety barriers. Principally, the invention is of an improved highway guardrail end treatment for guardrail barrier systems.
Highway safety devices utilized along most roadways are comprised primarily of guardrail barrier systems. Guardrails called W-beam guardrails are used to prevent vehicles from leaving the roadway and possibly colliding with fixed objects, other vehicles, or other safety hazards. For this, the semi-rigid guardrail barrier must be able to resist lateral impact forces, for instance a vehicle approaching at an angle to the length of rail. In this the barrier should perform in such a way that the vehicle is safely redirected back onto the roadway as opposed to tearing through or passing through the guardrail.
The ability of guardrail to resist this lateral loading force is dependent upon a universally accepted corrugated shape, which dissipates the energy of the vehicle in a safe and controlled manner. However, the rigidity of a W-beam guardrail is such that an upstream, or terminal end of a length of guardrail, can, in itself, present a hazard. Vehicles impacting the end section of a guardrail barrier without an appropriate terminal device encounter extreme forces that can lead to serious injury or death of the occupants. This problem of addressing terminal safety is a major area of research within the highway safety industry.
Recent design alternatives have placed emphasis on two main categories of terminal devices. These are terminal devices (or terminals) which gate the vehicle into a clear zone located behind the guardrail length opposite the roadway, and those that absorb the energy of the impacting vehicle through controlled dynamic buckling of the guardrail. Additionally, terminals can be either flared or tangent to the roadway.
Of the current terminal designs available, two are found to be the most widely used. Both systems are designed within the constraints of the currently accepted uniform standards, such that vehicles impacting at an angle to the length of guardrail are redirected away from the hazard. Functions during end-on impacts are design dependent to each terminal.
The first terminal system is an energy absorbing safety treatment which utilizes a customized head assembly. This head assembly functions to induce controlled buckling of the terminal guardrail, such that the vehicle is brought to a controlled stop after all impacting energy has been dissipated. The concept of this terminal system has been applied to both flared and tangent applications.
The second terminal system, existing only as a flared gating system, utilizes slotted regions in the W-beam guardrail to reduce column strength in longitudinal impacts. A designed plate is set to maintain structural integrity during impacts, such that said slotted regions do not tear and allow the vehicle to pass through the barrier.
Therefore, the intent of highway safety is to develop guardrail terminal systems which will address the issue of end-on impacts, and at the same time maintain adequate structural integrity to safely redirect vehicles during lateral impacts. Alternative designs to existing systems should provide equivalent or better safety performance, as well as increase the availability of safety hardware through lowered costs, easier installation, and wide availability of common parts.
The aim of the present invention is such that problems with guardrail terminal sections can be addressed at the lowest possible cost to the consumer. This is attained through utilization of common parts and the reduction in hardware items required. It is also the intent that the system comply with existing design standards and is easily interchangeable in installation and components to other competitive systems.
The present invention features a cable assisted rail terminal for use in conjunction with standard highway guardrail barrier. The terminal is comprised of W-beam rail cut to allow interaction of a cable within the plane of the barrier. These cut or weakened regions are of sufficient size and quantity to properly reduce the ability of the rail to resist buckling in response to longitudinal impacts.
The invention utilizes the strength of the cable to appropriately dissipate lateral impact forces, such that the guardrail does not tear at those weakened regions, thus preventing the vehicle from leaving the roadway.
The cable, of sufficient length as to span the entirety of the terminal system, shares the load of impacting forces. The cable attachments are located such that during lateral impacts the force of the vehicle is dissipated into a ground anchor assembly, as opposed to directly through the guardrail beam.
This attachment of said cable is constructed of a common anchor bracket, known in the art, and to an anchor bracket of increased dimension from the standard item. The enlarged cable anchor bracket allows direct connection of said cable to said ground anchor assembly.
It is intended that the present invention utilize a number of support posts to maintain structural height of the guardrail panels and cable. At least one of said posts is to be frangible, while the quantity and dimension of each shall be adjusted to meet industry accepted design standards.
The cable integrated guardrail terminal system of the present invention utilizes a cable running the length of the system to engage an impacting vehicle in tandem with the W-beam components of said terminal. The W-beam contains holes placed longitudinally along the face of the rail to weaken column strength in axial impacts. A cable of sufficient length is used to aid in the safe redirection of laterally impacting vehicles by preventing tearing of the rail at said weakened locations. The terminal system also aids in safely bringing vehicles to a controlled stop away from the protected hazard.
The preferred embodiment of the present terminal system is as an end-treatment for highway guardrail barriers. The terminal can be used in conjunction with various other guardrail terminal anchorage systems, such as a breakaway cable anchor known in the art. The utilization of the system is to safely redirect laterally impacting vehicles back onto the roadway, and prevent vehicle spearing during end-on impacts. The system is intended to gate vehicles into a clear zone behind the guardrail barrier or bring vehicles to a controlled stop during axial impacts. The use of the terminal system is intended for all roadside applications, regardless of speed, made possible by modifying the W-beam components to fit expected impact conditions.
Referring now to the system shown in
Also, as shown in
With reference now to
With reference now to
Another cable 19 passes from the double cable bracket 20, to be connected to the post 11 carried via lower soil tube 30.
The post 12 is carried via soil tube 31, with a horizontal strut member 32 disposed between soil tubes 30 and 31.
With reference to
With reference now to
With reference to
With reference now to
The overall length of each W-beam section as shown, from left to right in
The double cable anchor bracket illustrated in
The cable 18, shown in
As shown in
Other holes 44 are shown in
With reference to
The double-cable bracket illustrated in
The double cable bracket 20 of
With reference to the cable of
With reference to
With reference to
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/325,638 filed Dec. 20, 2002, now abandoned which in turn is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/236,190 filed Aug. 23, 2002, now abandoned, which, in turn, is based upon provisional application 60/315,528, filed Aug. 29, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3776520 | Charles et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4075473 | Winston | Feb 1978 | A |
4260296 | Hilfiker | Apr 1981 | A |
4466222 | Mitchell | Aug 1984 | A |
4496264 | Casey | Jan 1985 | A |
4655434 | Bronstad | Apr 1987 | A |
4819916 | Wun-chung | Apr 1989 | A |
5022782 | Gertz et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5039066 | Stacey | Aug 1991 | A |
5078366 | Sicking et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5391016 | Ivey et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5407298 | Sicking et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5547310 | Muller | Aug 1996 | A |
5765811 | Alberson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775675 | Sicking et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797591 | Krage | Aug 1998 | A |
5957435 | Bronstad | Sep 1999 | A |
6022003 | Sicking et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6065738 | Pearce et al. | May 2000 | A |
6109597 | Sicking et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6173943 | Welch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220575 | Lindsay et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6244571 | Reid et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6575434 | Bligh et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6669402 | Davis et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6719483 | Welandsson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005028757 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050077507 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60315528 | Aug 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10325638 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11003803 | US | |
Parent | 10236190 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10325638 | US |