The present application relates generally to gas well dewatering systems. More particularly, the present application relates to hanger systems for supporting a cable-supported dewatering pump in a gas well.
Hydrocarbons and other fluids are often contained within subterranean formations at elevated pressures. Wells drilled into these formations allow the elevated pressure within the formation to force the fluids to the surface. However, in low pressure formations, or when formation pressure has diminished, the formation pressure may be insufficient to force fluids to the surface. In these cases, a positive displacement pump, such as a piston pump, can be installed to provide the required pressure to produce the fluids.
The function of pumping systems in gas wells is to produce liquid, generally water, that enters the well bore naturally with the gas. This is generally necessary only on low flow rate gas wells. In high flow rate gas wells, the velocity of the gas tends to be sufficient enough that it carries the water to the surface. In low flow rate wells, the water accumulates in the well bore and restricts the flow of gas. By pumping out the water, the pump allows the well to flow at a higher gas rate, and this additional produced gas, which eventually is related to additional revenue, and helps pay for the pumping unit.
According to an embodiment, it is herein disclosed to use a cable that is capable of holding its own weight, plus the weight of dewatering pump equipment deployed at depths in excess of 10,000 feet. The cable can be configured to conduct electricity required to power the pumping system. In addition, the cable can also be used to retrieve the pumping system via for example a winch located at the surface of the well.
Once the pump is landed downhole, the supporting cable must be landed at the surface via a permanent weight-supporting device or cable hanger. The cable hanger can include primary and secondary means of support such as a friction clamp system in combination with a rope socket system, back-up clamp, and/or the like.
The present disclosure recognizes that it is necessary to provide a system for picking up the cable hanger (primary, secondary or otherwise) so that the downhole pumping system can be pulled from the well when it no longer functions properly. It is desirable to provide such a pickup system that is simple, fast, strong and extremely reliable, as a failure may result in injury or death. The pickup system can be applied to the primary weight-holding device or hanger, or to a secondary or later such device. Preferably, it is applied to the last weight-bearing device installed (i.e. the first picked up).
In one example, the hanger system includes a dewatering pump supported in a downhole location by a cable, a cable hanger bearing the weight of the cable and the weight of the dewatering pump, and a pulling tool configured to detachably connect to the cable hanger and support the weight of the cable hanger, cable and gas well dewatering system as it is pulled out of a seated position in the well.
In another example, the pulling tool includes a bearing sleeve and a locking sleeve, wherein one of the bearing sleeve and locking sleeve is slidable axially relative to the other to selectively cause a ball bearing to engage with and bear on surfaces of the cable hanger and the pulling tool to thereby connect the pulling tool to the cable hanger in a manner that the pulling tool can support the weight of the cable hanger, cable, and dewatering pump.
In another example, the pulling tool includes a pulling sleeve and locking sleeve, wherein one of the pulling sleeve and locking sleeve are slidable axially relative to the other against a bias to selectively cause a collet finger to bear on a surface of the cable hanger and thereby connect the pulling tool to the cable hanger in a manner that the pulling tool can support the weight of the cable hanger, cable and dewatering pump.
In another example, the pulling tool includes a sleeve having internal threads configured to couple with threads on the cable hanger and a flange surface for engaging with a bearing surface located inside of the sleeve.
In another example, the pulling tool is connected to the hanger by a J-slot connection.
The best mode is described hereinbelow with reference to the following drawing figures.
In the following description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed. The different systems described herein may be used alone or in combination with other systems. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives, and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims.
The cable hanger system 10 depicted in
In the example shown in
After the cable is landed in the primary and secondary cable hangers 28, 30, the cable 14 can be cut and a cable head cap 38 and associated seal 40 installed to seal around and protect the cable 14. The cable 14 passes through the seal 40 for connection to an applicable surface power control system (not shown).
In use,
To reconnect the pulling tool 102 to the hanger 116, the locking sleeve 106 is pushed upwardly (arrow 108) against the bias of spring 120 until the ball bearing 110 is allowed to move into the adjacent aperture 124 and recess 122. Thereafter, the pulling tool 102 is slid axially downward (arrow 146) onto the cable hanger 116 until the ball bearing 110 is allowed to roll into the aperture 118 in the cable hanger 116. Thereafter, the locking sleeve 106 is released and the bias of spring 120 forces the locking sleeve 106 downwardly (arrow 146) to force the ball bearing 110 to bear on the surfaces 112, 114.
In the example shown, the collet finger 160 is part of the locking sleeve 154 and the pulling sleeve 152 is axially slidable relative to the locking sleeve 154 from a first position shown in
To reinstall the pulling tool 151 onto the cable hanger 164, the above steps are repeated in reverse order. The pulling sleeve 152 is slid axially downward (arrow 161) against the bias of spring 158 and the entire pulling tool 151 is slid axially downward (arrow 161) onto the cable hanger 164. The cam surface 172 on the cable hanger 164 applies moderate stress to the collet finger 160, thus causing the finger 160 to deflect radially outwardly as the tool 151 moves in the direction of arrow 161. As the collet finger 160 aligns with the aperture 168, its natural resiliency causes it to snap into place and engage with the aperture 168. Thereafter, the bias of spring 158 causes the pulling sleeve 152 to move axially upward in the direction of arrow 156 thus sandwiching the collet finger 160 between the surfaces 166, 170 and connecting the pulling tool 151 to the hanger 164.
To install the pulling tool 202 onto the cable hanger 216, the locking sleeve 206 is moved upward (arrow 212) against the bias of spring 208 and the entire tool 202 is forced downwardly in the direction of arrow 222. The collet finger 210 is cammed outwardly by camming surface 224 on cable hanger 216 and then its natural resiliency causes the collet finger 210 to snap into the recess 220. Thereafter, the locking sleeve 206 is moved downwardly in the direction of arrow 222 by the bias of spring 208 until the collet finger 210 is sandwiched between the surfaces 214, 218, thus connecting the pulling tool 202 to the hanger 216.
To install the pulling tool 352, it is inserted onto the cable hanger 354 against the bias of spring 356 until the pin 360 (aligned in the slot 362) bottoms out on the end 364 of the J-slot 362. The field operator then turns the pulling tool 352 about its longitudinal axis 366 and allows the bias of spring 356 to push the pulling tool 352 upwards in the direction of arrow 367 until the pin bottoms out at the end 368 of J-slot 362. Engagement between the pin 360 and end 368 of J-slot 362 couples the pulling tool 352 to the cable hanger 354. The pulling tool 352 can be disengaged from the cable hanger 354 by following the above steps in reverse.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2708411 | Richardson | May 1955 | A |
2834300 | Brock | May 1955 | A |
2941629 | Rohacs | Jun 1960 | A |
3183972 | Fredd | May 1965 | A |
3589838 | Tuzson | Jun 1971 | A |
3912009 | Davis, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
4043390 | Glotin | Aug 1977 | A |
4184515 | Streich et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4317485 | Ross | Mar 1982 | A |
4598630 | Kao | Jul 1986 | A |
4688999 | Ames et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5188517 | Koster | Feb 1993 | A |
5203172 | Simpson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5229017 | Nimerick et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5577890 | Nielsen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5778978 | Crow | Jul 1998 | A |
5871051 | Mann | Feb 1999 | A |
5961841 | Bowers | Oct 1999 | A |
6000468 | Pringle | Dec 1999 | A |
6017198 | Traylor et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6044909 | Gano | Apr 2000 | A |
6069118 | Hinkel et al. | May 2000 | A |
6089322 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6140277 | Tibbles et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140817 | Flaum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6196309 | Estilette, Sr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6508310 | Mioduszewski et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6569814 | Brady et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6638896 | Tibbles et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6660693 | Miller et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720290 | England et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6837309 | Boney et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854515 | Matthews et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6915854 | England et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6964299 | Scarsdale | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7005765 | Schulz et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7124819 | Ciglenec et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150325 | Ireland et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7380608 | Geier | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7726404 | Kubala et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020108757 | Traylor | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040060705 | Kelley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084178 | Reid | May 2004 | A1 |
20060083645 | Simmons | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070023191 | Dreggevik | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070110597 | Traylor et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070227732 | Miller et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251704 | Reimert et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090217992 | Wilson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100096129 | Hinkel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100206544 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206549 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206568 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209265 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211226 | Dowling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2099043 | Dec 1982 | GB |
2339914 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2436576 | Oct 2007 | GB |
2457784 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2010096303 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010096431 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010096481 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100206544 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |