The present invention relates to integrated circuits and semiconductor devices (ICs) in general and their methods of manufacture wherein the integrated circuits and semiconductor devices employ camouflaging techniques, which would make it difficult for the reverse engineer to discern how the semiconductor device is manufactured.
The present invention is related to the following US patents and patent applications by some of the same inventors as the present inventors:
The creation of complex integrated circuits and semiconductor devices can be a very expensive undertaking given the large number of hours of sophisticated engineering talent involved in designing such devices. Additionally, integrated circuits can include read-only memories into which software, in the form of firmware, is encoded. Further, integrated circuits are often used in applications involving the encryption of information, and therefore in order to keep such information confidential, it can be desirable to keep such devices from being reverse engineered. Thus, there can be a variety of reasons for protecting integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from being reversed engineered.
In order to keep the reverse engineer at bay, different techniques are known in the art to make integrated circuits more difficult to reverse engineer. One technique that is used is to make the connections between transistors difficult enough to determine that the reverse engineer must carefully analyze each transistor (in particular, each CMOS transistor pair for CMOS devices), and not use automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques in order to reverse engineer the integrated circuit. Since integrated circuits can have hundreds of thousands or even millions of transistors, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor in a device can effectively frustrate the reverse engineer's ability to reverse engineer the device successfully.
The prior art techniques mentioned above, if successful, will force the reverse engineer to study the metal connections to try to figure out the boundaries of standard circuits and to try to figure out their function. For example, gate connections may utilize the polysilicon layer (the first polysilicon layer in a process having two or more polysilicon layers) and the reverse engineer would look for these contacts, knowing that these gate contacts are typically the input to transistors and hence to a standard circuit. In addition, the source and drain contacts are made to the substrate via metal interconnects. One way in which the reverse engineer might work would be to look for cell boundaries by means of looking for silicon-to-gate poly metal lines, as these suggest the possibilities for contacts between the output (the drain contact) from one transistor cell into the input (the gate contact) of a next transistor cell. If this can be done, the reverse engineer can define cell boundaries by these silicon-gate poly lines. Then, by noting the cell boundaries, the reverse engineer can find the cell characteristics (for example, size and number of transistors) and from this make reasonable assumptions as to the cell's function. In addition to cell boundaries, the reverse engineer may also rely upon the size of the transistor and its location. For example, P-channel devices (PMOS) are larger than N-channel devices (NMOS), and all PMOS devices are grouped in one row while all NMOS devices are grouped in a different row. This information could then be stored in a database for automatic classification of other similar cells.
It is an object of this invention to make reverse engineering more difficult and, in particular, to force the reverse engineer to study implants under the gates. It is believed that this will make the reverse engineer's efforts all the more difficult by making it very time consuming, and perhaps making it exceedingly impractical, if not impossible, to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention. The present invention can be used harmoniously with techniques disclosed in the prior United States patents and patent applications identified above to further confuse the reverse engineer.
a depicts a simplified cross-section of a prior art single well CMOS device. In a NMOS device, shown on the left, an active region 16a is typically a n-type source region, while active region 18a is typically a n-type drain region disposed in a p-type substrate 12. A gate 20a may be manufactured out of a layer of polysilicon 19 disposed upon a layer of gate oxide 21. The gate 20a is disposed between the two active regions 16a, 18a. Field Oxide 10 isolates the NMOS device from the PMOS device of the CMOS pair and other semiconductor devices within the IC. In a PMOS device, shown on the right, an active region 16b is typically a p-type source region, while active region 18b is typically a p-type drain region disposed in a n-type well 42 of the substrate 12. A gate 20b may be manufactured out of a layer of polysilicon 19 disposed upon a layer of gate oxide 21. The gate 20b is disposed between the two p-type active regions 16b, 18b. The n-type well 42 isolates the p-type active regions 16b, 18b from the p-type substrate 12.
b depicts a simplified cross-section of another prior art CMOS device. Two major goals in the semiconductor industry are to increase the density and to increase the speed of digital or analog integrated circuits (ICs). Increasing the density means using smaller channel lengths and widths. In order to satisfy the conditions such as separation of highly integrated fine or minute elements of a semiconductor device, some n-type devices of a CMOS pair having a substrate of a first conductivity type have a well of the same conductivity type as the substrate.
The present invention preferably makes use of a standard CMOS manufacturing process called a “double well process” in which the semiconductor substrate of a first conductivity has a well having a first conductivity type, and a well having a second conductivity type. One skilled in the art will appreciate, after reading this patent, that the present invention may also make use of other CMOS processes that are not double well processes. Masks are used to determine the location and shapes of the first conductivity type wells and the second conductivity type wells.
As will be seen, changing the location of the different wells forms a conduction path between two active regions, such as the source and drain. Thus, the resulting semiconductor device will be permanently ON for any reasonable gate voltage. Therefore, with the present invention, the circuit may be constructed to look the same as some conventional circuits, but the functionality of selected transistors will be quite different and therefore the circuit will function quite differently from the circuit that it visually mimics. Since the reverse engineering process looks for repeating patterns of circuit devices (as seen from a top or plan view) and assumes that all repeating patterns reflect the same circuit functions, the reverse engineer is apt to assume an incorrect function when trying to copy the original integrated circuit. Thus, the real functionality of the integrated circuit in which the present invention is used is hidden. Of course, if this technique of making a pattern of transistors mimic a conventional circuit but perform a different function is used hundreds or thousands of times in a complex integrated circuit having perhaps millions of transistors, the reverse engineer ends up with not only a device which does not work, but also a daunting task of trying to figure out what went wrong with the assumptions that he or she made in analyzing the chip to be reverse engineered. This additional effort, if undertaken, forces the reverse engineer to spend additional time trying to determine how the chip in question is really configured.
The present invention not only provides a device and method that will confuse the reverse engineer, but it also provides a simpler path to implementation than other methods of inhibiting the reverse engineering process. The technique disclosed herein may be utilized to modify the library design of a particular vendor as opposed to forming a completely new and different appearing library. Thus, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the cost and time associated with the present invention is less than other methods used to inhibit integrated circuits from being reverse engineered.
Note that the present invention might only be used once in a thousand of instances of what appears to be a semiconductor device or a pattern of devices on the chip in question, but the reverse engineer will have to look very carefully at each semiconductor device or pattern knowing full well that for each semiconductor device or pattern that he or she sees, there is a very low likelihood that it has been modified by the present invention. The reverse engineer will be faced with having to find the proverbial needle in a haystack.
Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention comprises a method of camouflaging an integrated circuit for the purpose of deterring a reverse engineer, wherein a well of the same type as the source and drain regions is placed under the gate in contact with the source and drain region.
In another aspect, the present invention provides for camouflaging an integrated circuit structure. The integrated circuit structure is formed by a plurality of wells. The well under the gate being disposed adjacent to the same type source and drain regions.
a is a simplified cross-sectional view of a prior art CMOS device with a single well process;
b is a simplified cross-sectional view of a prior art CMOS device having a substrate of a conductivity type and a well of the same conductivity type for the n-type device made by a double-well process;
a through 4c are exemplary simplified process sequences for a single well CMOS device in accordance with the present invention;
a through 5d are exemplary simplified process sequences for a double well CMOS device in accordance with the present invention;
a through 6d are a second set of exemplary simplified process sequences in accordance with the present invention;
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
As shown in
While the devices of
a-4c show how the semiconductor device depicted in
The CMOS transistor pair in
Prior art devices, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,375 and U.S. application Ser. No. 09/882,892 previously discussed, utilize buried contacts to connect active regions. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the doping concentration of a source or drain implant is typically on the order of 1019 atoms/cm3. The doping concentration of a well is typically on the order of 1013 atoms/cm3 to 1015 atoms/cm3. The doping concentration of a buried contact is typically on the order of 1018 atoms cm3. Thus, buried contacts refer to implants with a higher doping concentration than a well, typically much closer to the doping concentration of a source/drain implant. In the present device and method it is a well that is being used to provide the connection between the active regions. Further, the depth of a buried contact is generally more similar to the depth of the source/drain implants, while a well implant is generally deeper than the source/drain implants. Also, well 22 can be easily formed at the same time as well 42 is formed.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that there are a variety of different processes available for the manufacture of semiconductor devices. The following discussion is provided as an example relating to a 0.35 μm process in accordance with the present invention. The present invention may also be applied to other processes using the same basic methodology, although the exact details, such as dimensions and doping levels, will differ. Process steps used to make the devices shown in
a-4c depict processes that may be used in forming a device in accordance with the present invention. Turning to
In
a-5d depict an exemplary set of process steps that may be used in producing a double well CMOS device in accordance with the present invention. Turning to
In
In
In
There are other methods, other than the manufacturing process described above and shown in
In
In
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the concentration of phosphorous ions 38 is much larger when the active regions 16a, 18a are formed compared to the concentration of phosphorous ions 34 when the n-wells 22, 42 are formed. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the combination of temperature and ion concentration can be varied in accordance with typical semiconductor process such that the desired region/well depth can be obtained. Preferably, the temperature cycles and the ion concentrations are chosen such that the n-type wells 22, 42 are deeper than the n-type source and drain regions 16a, 18a. In addition in some applications, the temperature cycles and ion concentrations are preferably chosen such that the n-type wells 22, 42 are deeper than the p-type well 14. This insures that n-type well 22 overrides p-type well 14.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the p-type wells 14a, 14b are not required in order for the device to be always ON. However, given the small feature size of conventional devices, it is common for the devices to have a p-type well 14 of the same conductivity type as the substrate 12, as shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention utilizes a permanently ON PMOS transistor. Without adding additional processing steps to the formation of the semiconductor device, the PMOS device formed by the present invention can always be ON but shorted to the substrate. In the prior art PMOS transistors, such as the one shown in
One skilled in the art will appreciate that in some applications it may be undesirable for the semiconductor device to be shorted to the substrate as shown in
In
If a PMOS and a NMOS device are both to be manufactured using a standard double-well manufacturing process without adding additional process steps, then one skilled in the art will appreciate that n-well 42 is generally not placed to ensure p-well 52 will be placed under gate 20b. However, the structures shown in
It is very difficult for the reverse engineer to detect the techniques disclosed herein. For example, even when using microscopic investigates like SEM analysis on the top (plan view) side of the circuit of semiconductor devices altered by the techniques herein disclosed, the altered circuit will look identical to other standard semiconductor devices. Should the reverse engineer determine that further analysis of all millions of the semiconductor devices is required, then the metal, oxide, and insulation layers must be carefully removed. Next, the reverse engineer must perform a stain and etch to determine that the well implant has been placed where the gate had been. This will be difficult because for many dense ICs there will always be a well implant in the gate region under the gate, only the well implant is usually a different type than the active regions adjacent to the gate region. However, in the case of the present invention, the well will be the same type as the semiconductor active regions adjacent to the gate region. Therefore, the reverse engineer must be able to determine between the different types of well conductivity types. Using the present techniques, the gate well implants are low dose. Thus, the chemical etches dependent on the chemical nature of the implanted material will not be as effective. As a result, it is believed that the techniques which will be needed to detect the use of the present invention will be sufficiently time consuming to deter the reverse engineer. A complex integrated circuit may comprise millions of semiconductor devices, and if the reverse engineer must carefully analyze each semiconductor device in order to determine whether or not the present invention has been used to disguise each semiconductor device, the effort involved in reverse engineering such an integrated circuit will be tremendous.
Having described the invention in connection with certain embodiments thereof, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art, for example, other doses or other types of semiconductor devices. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as is specifically required by the appended claims.
This application is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/735,841, filed on Dec. 12, 2003 which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,514,755 with an Issue Date of Apr. 7, 2009. This application claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/433,314 filed Dec. 13, 2002, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/758,792 and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/882,892 filed Jun. 15, 2001 mentioned below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3673471 | Klein et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3898105 | Mai | Aug 1975 | A |
3946426 | Sanders | Mar 1976 | A |
3983620 | Spadea | Oct 1976 | A |
4017888 | Christie et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4101344 | Kooi et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4139864 | Schulman | Feb 1979 | A |
4143854 | Vetter | Mar 1979 | A |
4145701 | Kawagoe | Mar 1979 | A |
4164461 | Schilling | Aug 1979 | A |
4196443 | Dingwall | Apr 1980 | A |
4267578 | Vetter | May 1981 | A |
4291391 | Chatterjee et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4295897 | Tubbs et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4314268 | Yoshioka et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4317273 | Guterman et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322736 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4374454 | Jochems | Feb 1983 | A |
4393575 | Dunkley | Jul 1983 | A |
4409434 | Basset et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4435895 | Parrillo | Mar 1984 | A |
4471376 | Morcom et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4493740 | Komeda | Jan 1985 | A |
4530150 | Shirato | Jul 1985 | A |
4581628 | Miyauchi et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4583011 | Pechar | Apr 1986 | A |
4603381 | Guttag et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4623255 | Suszko | Nov 1986 | A |
4636822 | Codella et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4727038 | Watabe | Feb 1988 | A |
4729001 | Haskel | Mar 1988 | A |
4753897 | Lund et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4766516 | Ozdemir | Aug 1988 | A |
4771012 | Yabu et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4799096 | Koeppe | Jan 1989 | A |
4814854 | Tigelaar et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821085 | Haken et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829356 | Arndt | May 1989 | A |
4830974 | Chang et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860084 | Shibata | Aug 1989 | A |
4912053 | Schrantz | Mar 1990 | A |
4927777 | Hsu et al. | May 1990 | A |
4931411 | Tigelaar et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939567 | Kenney | Jul 1990 | A |
4962484 | Takeshima et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975756 | Haken et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4998151 | Korman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015596 | Toyoda et al. | May 1991 | A |
5016077 | Sato | May 1991 | A |
5030796 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5050123 | Castro | Sep 1991 | A |
5061978 | Mizutani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065208 | Shah et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068697 | Noda et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070378 | Yamagata | Dec 1991 | A |
5073812 | Shimura | Dec 1991 | A |
5101121 | Sourgen | Mar 1992 | A |
5117276 | Thomas et al. | May 1992 | A |
5120669 | Schrantz | Jun 1992 | A |
5121089 | Larson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5121186 | Wong et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132571 | McCollum et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138197 | Kuwana | Aug 1992 | A |
5146117 | Larson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5168340 | Nishimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5177589 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5202591 | Walden | Apr 1993 | A |
5210437 | Sawada et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225699 | Nakamura | Jul 1993 | A |
5227649 | Chapman | Jul 1993 | A |
5231299 | Ning et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5302539 | Haken et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308682 | Morikawa | May 1994 | A |
5309015 | Kuwata et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317197 | Roberts | May 1994 | A |
5336624 | Walden | Aug 1994 | A |
5341013 | Koyanagi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345105 | Sun et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354704 | Yang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369299 | Byrne et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371390 | Mohsen | Dec 1994 | A |
5371443 | Sun et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376577 | Roberts et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378641 | Cheffings | Jan 1995 | A |
5384472 | Yin | Jan 1995 | A |
5384475 | Yahata | Jan 1995 | A |
5399441 | Bearinger et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404040 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412237 | Komori et al. | May 1995 | A |
5441902 | Hsieh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453635 | Hsu | Sep 1995 | A |
5468990 | Daum | Nov 1995 | A |
5475251 | Kuo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5506806 | Fukushima | Apr 1996 | A |
5510279 | Chien et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5531018 | Saia et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539224 | Ema | Jul 1996 | A |
5541614 | Lam et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571735 | Mogami et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576988 | Kuo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580804 | Joh | Dec 1996 | A |
5585658 | Mukai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5611940 | Zettler | Mar 1997 | A |
5635749 | Hong | Jun 1997 | A |
5638946 | Zavracky | Jun 1997 | A |
5650340 | Burr et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675172 | Miyamoto et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677557 | Wuu et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679595 | Chen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702972 | Tsai | Dec 1997 | A |
5719422 | Burr et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719430 | Goto | Feb 1998 | A |
5721150 | Pasch | Feb 1998 | A |
5744372 | Bulucea | Apr 1998 | A |
5763916 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783375 | Twist | Jul 1998 | A |
5783846 | Baukus et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789298 | Gardner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811340 | Park | Sep 1998 | A |
5821147 | Kizilyali | Oct 1998 | A |
5821590 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831306 | Gardner et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834356 | Bothra et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834809 | Kato et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838047 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854510 | Sur et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858843 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866933 | Baukus et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874328 | Liu et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877050 | Gardner et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880503 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888887 | Li et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891782 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895241 | Lu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909622 | Kadosh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920097 | Horne | Jul 1999 | A |
5925914 | Jiang | Jul 1999 | A |
5930663 | Baukus et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930667 | Oda | Jul 1999 | A |
5933737 | Goto | Aug 1999 | A |
5960291 | Krivokapic | Sep 1999 | A |
5973375 | Baukus et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977593 | Hara | Nov 1999 | A |
5998257 | Lane et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998272 | Ishida et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010929 | Chapman | Jan 2000 | A |
6020227 | Bulucea | Feb 2000 | A |
6030869 | Odake et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031272 | Hiroki et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037627 | Kitamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044011 | Marr | Mar 2000 | A |
6046659 | Loo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054659 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057520 | Goodwin-Johansson | May 2000 | A |
6064110 | Baukus et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078080 | Kadosh et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080614 | Neilson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084248 | Inoue | Jul 2000 | A |
6090692 | Song | Jul 2000 | A |
6093609 | Chuang | Jul 2000 | A |
6103563 | Lukanc et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117762 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137318 | Takaaki | Oct 2000 | A |
6146952 | Nariman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153484 | Donaton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154388 | Oh | Nov 2000 | A |
6215158 | Choi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242329 | Huster et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255174 | Yu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261912 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6294816 | Baukus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6316303 | Lin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326675 | Scott et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337249 | Yamane et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365453 | Deboer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373106 | Maki et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6380041 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384457 | Tyagi et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6399452 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410413 | Scott et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6455388 | Lai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465315 | Yu | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466489 | Ieong et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476449 | Lin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479350 | Ling | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503787 | Choi | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534787 | Hsu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566204 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6613661 | Baukus | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6653694 | Osanai | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6740942 | Baukus et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746924 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6815816 | Clark et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825530 | Brown et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6833307 | Wristers et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833589 | Matsuhashi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6911694 | Negoro et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921690 | Church | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930361 | Inaba | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933250 | Totsuka et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933560 | Lee | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7012273 | Chen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7091114 | Ito | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7179712 | Hoefler | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7208383 | Weintraub et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7242063 | Chow et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7344932 | Chow | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20010042892 | Okada | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020043689 | Matsuoka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058368 | Tseng | May 2002 | A1 |
20020096776 | Chow | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020173131 | Clark, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190355 | Baukus et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030057476 | Morita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030127709 | Lippmann | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173622 | Porter et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030205816 | Janke | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040051137 | Kitamura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061186 | Chow et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075147 | Ueda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099912 | Chow et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040144998 | Chow | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040164361 | Baukus | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040211990 | Asano | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050082625 | Kim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050230787 | Chow | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060049449 | Iino | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071278 | Takao | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105489 | Rhodes | May 2006 | A1 |
20060157803 | Chow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 186 855 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0 364 769 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 463 373 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 528 302 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 585 601 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 764 985 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 883 184 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 920 057 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 193 758 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 202 353 | May 2002 | EP |
2 486 717 | Jan 1982 | FR |
S58-016565 | Jul 1982 | JP |
58-190064 | Jan 1983 | JP |
S59-035465 | Feb 1984 | JP |
61-147551 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-201472 | Sep 1986 | JP |
63-129647 | Jun 1988 | JP |
H01-213350 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02-046762 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H02-062118 | Mar 1990 | JP |
02-188944 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-237038 | Sep 1990 | JP |
H02-237038 | Sep 1990 | JP |
04-028092 | Jan 1992 | JP |
H04-267553 | Sep 1992 | JP |
05-218849 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H05-218849 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H08-274041 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-256398 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000-040809 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-040810 | Feb 2000 | JP |
9821734 | May 1998 | WO |
9857373 | Dec 1998 | WO |
0044012 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0055889 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Response to British Office Action for British Patent Application No. 0512203.1 (Mar. 6, 2007). |
British Office action for British Patent Application No. 0512203.1 (Nov. 10, 2006). |
Response to British Office Action for British Patent Application No. 0512203.1 (Oct. 9, 2006). |
British Office action for British Patent Application No. 0512203.1 (Jun. 7, 2006). |
Response to British Office Action for British Patent Application No. 0512203.1 (Apr. 26, 2006). |
Blythe, et al., “Layout Reconstruction of Complex Silicon Chips,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 138-145 (Feb. 1993). |
Frederiksen, Thomas M., “Standard Circuits in the New CMOS Era,” Intuitive CMOS Electronics, Revised Edition, pp. 134-146 (Jan. 1989). |
Hodges and Jackson, Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, p. 353 (1988). |
IBM—TDB “Double Polysilicon Dynamic Memory Cell with Polysilicon Bit Line,” vol. 21, Issue No. 9, pp. 3828-3831 (Feb. 1979). |
IBM—TDB, “Static Ram Double Polysilicon Process,” vol. 23, Issue No. 8 pp. 3683-3686 (Jan. 1981). |
Larson, L.E., et al., “Microactuators for GaAs-based Microwave Integrated Circuits,” IEEE, pp. 743-746 (1991). |
Lee, “Engineering a Device for Electron-Beam Probing,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, pp. 36-49 (Jun. 1989). |
Ng. K.K., Complete Guide to Semiconductor Devices, McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp. 164-165 (1995). |
Sze, S.M., VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 99, 447, 461-465 (1983). |
Sze, S.M., ed., “Silicides for Gates and Interconnections,” VLSI Technology, McGraw-Hill, pp. 372-380 (1983). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/758,792, filed Jan. 11, 2001, Baukus. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/391,258, filed Sep. 7, 1999, Baukus. |
VLSI manufacturing process, pp. 172 and 279, published 1997 in Taiwan (untranslated). |
Office action dated May 28, 2002 from Taiwanese Patent No. 201664 with its English translation. |
Office action mailed on Feb. 8, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2000-614502 and its English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090170255 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10735841 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 12399628 | US |