Integrated circuits protected against reverse engineering and method for fabricating the same using an apparent metal contact line terminating on field oxide

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7294935
  • Patent Number
    7,294,935
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 24, 2001
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 13, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
Semiconducting devices, including integrated circuits, protected from reverse engineering comprising metal traces leading to field oxide. Metallization usually leads to the gate, source or drain areas of the circuit, but not to the insulating field oxide, thus misleading a reverse engineer. A method for fabricating such devices.
Description
I. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to the field of the prevention of reverse engineering of integrated circuits and/or making such reverse engineering so difficult and time-consuming as to make reverse engineering of integrated circuits non-feasible.


More particularly, this invention relates to using, in order to prevent and/or discourage such reverse engineering, apparent metal contact lines terminating on field oxide.


2. Description of the Related Art


The design and development of semiconductor integrated circuits require thorough understanding of complex structures and processes and involve many man-hours of work requiring high skill, costing considerable sums of money.


In order to avoid these expenses, some developers stoop to the contentious practice of reverse engineering, disassembling existing devices manufactured by somebody else, and closely examining them to determine the physical structure of the integrated circuit, followed by copying the device. Thus, by obtaining a planar optical image of the circuits and by studying and copying them, typically required, product development efforts are circumvented.


Such practices harm the true developer of the product and impairs its competitiveness in the market-place, because the developer had to expend significant resources for the development, while the reverse engineer did not have to.


A number of approaches have been used in order to frustrate such reverse engineering attempts, particularly in the field of semiconductor integrated circuits.


For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,933 to Baukus, et. al. teaches how transistors in a complementary metal oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuit can be connected by implanted, hidden and buried lines between the transistors. This hiding is achieved by modifying the p+ and n+ source/drain masks. The implanted interconnections are further used to make a 3-input AND-circuit look substantially the same as a 3-input OR-circuit.


Furthermore, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846 to Baukus, et. al. and 5,930,663 to Baukus et. al. teach a further modification in the source/drain implant masks, so that the implanted connecting lines between transistors have a gap inserted, the length of which is approximately the length of the feature size of the CMOS technology being used. These gaps are called “channel blocks.”


If the gap is “filled” with one kind of implant (depending on whether the implanted connecting line is p or n), the line conducts; if another kind of implant is used for the gap-filling, the line does not conduct. The reverse engineer must determine connectivity on the basis of resolving the “n” or “p” implant at the minimum feature size of the channel block. In addition, transistor sizes and metal connection routings are modified, in order to deprive the reverse engineer of using clues which can help him find inputs, outputs, gate lines and so on as keys to the circuit functionality.


Practicing the inventions taught in the above-mentioned patents to secure an integrated circuit causes the reverse engineer to perform steps that are not always needed. These steps include: decomposing the circuit layer by layer, careful processing of each layer (which usually must include an etching step) followed by imaging of the layer with exact registration to other layers.


When the reverse engineer is delayering the circuit, he can look also for metal lines running from drain contacts to a poly-gate contact. He does this by looking in the two lowest metal layers for dimples, indicating the presence of metal plugs beneath. Thus, the contact position can be determined, greatly simplifying the reverse engineer's task. Previous patents mentioned above do not address this problem.


Therefore, there still exists a need for an inexpensive, easy-to-implement defensive method which can help to provide the enhanced protection against the reverse engineering of semiconductor integrated circuits, in particular to make the reverse engineer's task of finding real contacts to source and drains very difficult. The present invention provides such a method.


II. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Usual practice of reverse engineering is to try to determine a basic structure of an integrated circuit by identifying metal patterns in the higher level metal layers in the circuit. Metals on these layers route the electric signals between circuit blocks. Once a basic circuit function is determined, rather than look at each next transistor pair, the reverse engineer will utilize the similarity in the upper metal patterns and assume each circuit section showing that pattern is the same.


The main objective of this invention is to make a reverse engineer to examine every connection of every CMOS transistor pair in an integrated circuit. If the reverse engineer is forced to do such detailed examination, he would have to spend so much time and money as to make the attempt of reverse engineering prohibitive and leading to de facto protection against reverse engineering.


In order to achieve this objective, circuit techniques are used to make the pattern of a subsequent circuit section unpredictable and non-repeatable; in other words, these techniques make it incorrect to make a usual assumption that similar metal patterns encompass similar circuit functionality.


The gist of this invention is to guide the reverse engineer to an erroneous assumption by having some metal traces terminate on field oxide located close to a contact region. He will assume, erroneously, that the presence of the plug is to make a real contact to a source or drains when, in fact, there is none.


The field oxide that defines and borders on the contact area is offset so that it covers a portion of the contact area. Then, the dimple and the metal plug are aligned so that the metal plug ends on the field oxide adjacent to the source of drain.


The patterns will appear identical, but these apparent connections are not real connections. The reverse engineer will be led to the wrong conclusion as to the circuit block functionality as a result.


A first aspect of the invention provides a semiconducting device adapted to prevent and/or to thwart reverse engineering, comprising field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate, a metal plug contact disposed within a contact region and above said field oxide layer, and a metal connected to said metal plug contact.


A second aspect of the invention provides a method for preventing and/or thwarting reverse engineering, comprising steps of providing a field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate, providing a metal plug contact disposed within a contact region and above said field oxide layer, and connecting a metal to said metal plug contact.


A third aspect of the invention provides a semiconducting device adapted to prevent and/or to thwart reverse engineering, comprising field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate, a metal plug contact disposed outside a contact region and above said field oxide layer, and a metal connected to said metal plug contact.


A fourth aspect of the invention provides method for preventing and/or thwarting reverse engineering, comprising steps of providing a field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate, providing a metal plug contact disposed outside a contact region and above said field oxide layer and connecting a metal to said metal plug contact.





III. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where



FIG. 1 schematically shows a prior art field effect transistor that could be part of a CMOS integrated circuit.



FIG. 1(
a) schematically shows how a contact plug is usually located relative to field oxide in (also prior art).


FIG 1(b) schematically shows relative locations of the metal plug and the metallization layer.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a preferred embodiment of this invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing an alternative embodiment of this invention.





IV. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

This invention can be used on any semiconducting device utilizing, preferably, CMOS integrated circuits or bipolar silicon circuits.



FIG. 1 shows general architecture of some elements of a typical field effect transistor within a CMOS integrated circuit 100. The circuit 100 comprises a source 1, a drain 2, gate oxide 3, an insulating field oxide 4, preferably, silicon oxide. It further comprises a layer of polysilicon (“poly”) 5, of silicide 6, and a contact plug 7. The circuit 100 is disposed on a semiconducting substrate 8.



FIG. 1(
a) demonstrates how a contact plug 7 is positioned relative to field oxide 4 in prior art. The contact plug 7 is disposed over a layer of silicide 6 and over the active area 9. In FIG. 1, such a contact could be placed over both the source 1 and the drain 2.



FIG. 1(
b) shows that the contact plug 7 is disposed orthogonally to the plane of metallization layer 10. Such relative orientation of the contact plug 7 is present both in prior art and in this invention.


Seeing metallization 10, a reverse engineer will presume that it leads to either the source or the drain 2, or the gate. He will be misled and confused when the metal leads to the field oxide 4, as shown on FIG. 2 as a preferred embodiment of this invention.



FIG. 2 shows a contact plug 7 and the contact is meant to be to the right of field oxide 4. Field oxide 4 is deposited over a portion of the contact region, and the metal plug 7 which would have usually been placed to end on the contact region ends up on the field oxide 4 region instead.


The plug 7 typically has a substantially smaller area than the contact region.


L10 is the overlap area between the oxide region, the normal contact region and the placing of the plug 7. The diameter of the plug 7 is preferably not larger than the size of the minimum feature. L10 can be of any size, specified by the fabrication vendor, and is preferably 10% larger than the size of the minimum feature. A preferred contact dimension is up to about three times of the via size.


Alternatively, the plug 7 could also end on an oxide layer 4 deposited somewhere in the circuit where there would not be a contact. FIG. 3 shows such embodiment. As can be seen from FIG. 3, contact plug 7 does not extend into active area 9. Instead it ends on oxide layer 4.


Having described the invention in connection with several embodiments thereof, modification will now suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the described embodiments except as required by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconducting device adapted to prevent and/or to thwart reverse engineering, comprising: (a) a field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate having an opening defining a contact region of the semiconductor substrate;(b) a metal plug contact disposed above a section of field oxide located within said contact region, wherein said metal plug contact contacts said field oxide section, and wherein said field oxide section electrically isolates said metal plug contact from said contact region; and(c) a metal connected to said metal plug contact.
  • 2. The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said semiconducting device comprises integrated circuits.
  • 3. The device as claimed in claim 2, wherein said integrated circuits further comprise complementary metal oxide-semiconductor integrated circuits and bipolar silicon-based integrated circuits.
  • 4. The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said field oxide layer further comprises silicon oxide.
  • 5. The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said field oxide section has an uppermost side, said metal plug contact being disposed on said uppermost side of said field oxide layer.
  • 6. A method for preventing and/or thwarting reverse engineering, comprising: (a) providing a field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate having an opening defining a contact region of the semiconductor substrate;(b) providing a metal plug contact disposed above a section of field oxide located within said contact region, wherein said metal plug contact contacts said field oxide section, and wherein said field oxide section electrically isolates said metal plug contact from said contact region; and(c) connecting a metal to said metal plug contact.
  • 7. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein said semiconducting device comprises integrated circuits.
  • 8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said integrated circuits further comprise complementary metal oxide-semiconductor integrated circuits.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein said field oxide layer further comprises silicon oxide.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein said field oxide section has an uppermost side, said metal plug contact being disposed on said uppermost side of said field oxide layer.
  • 11. A semiconducting device adapted to prevent and/or to thwart reverse engineering, comprising: (a) a field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate having an opening defining a contact region of the semiconductor substrate;(b) a metal plug contact having a first surface and a second surface opposite said first surface, wherein said second surface of said metal plug contact is disposed above a section of field oxide located adjacent said contact region and in contact with a dielectric material, wherein no metal is electrically connected with said contact region; and(c) a metal connected to said first surface of said metal plug contact.
  • 12. The device as claimed in claim 11, wherein said semiconducting device comprises integrated circuits.
  • 13. The device as claimed in claim 12, wherein said integrated circuits further comprise complementary metal oxide-semiconductor integrated circuits and bipolar silicon-based integrated circuits.
  • 14. The device as claimed in claim 11, wherein said field oxide layer further comprises silicon oxide.
  • 15. The device as claimed in claim 11, wherein said field oxide section has an uppermost side, said metal plug contact being disposed on said uppermost side of said field oxide layer.
  • 16. The device of claim 11, wherein said field oxide layer comprises said dielectric material.
  • 17. A method for preventing and/or thwarting reverse engineering, comprising: (a) providing a field oxide layer disposed on a semiconductor substrate having an opening defining a contact region of the semiconductor substrate;(b) providing a metal plug contact having a first surface and a second surface opposite said first surface, wherein said second surface of said metal plug contact is disposed above a section of field oxide located adjacent said contact region and in contact with a dielectric material, wherein no metal is electrically connected with said contact region; and(c) connecting a metal to said first surface of said metal plug contact.
  • 18. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein said semiconducting device comprises integrated circuits.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein said integrated circuits further comprise complementary metal oxide-semiconductor integrated circuits.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein said field oxide layer further comprises silicon oxide.
  • 21. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein said field oxide section has an uppermost side, said metal plug contact being disposed on said uppermost side of said field oxide layer.
  • 22. The method of claim 17, wherein said field oxide layer comprises said dielectric material.
US Referenced Citations (108)
Number Name Date Kind
3673471 Klein et al. Jun 1972 A
3946426 Sanders Mar 1976 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4139864 Schulman Feb 1979 A
4164461 Schilling Aug 1979 A
4196443 Dingwall Apr 1980 A
4267578 Vetter May 1981 A
4291391 Chatterjee et al. Sep 1981 A
4295897 Tubbs et al. Oct 1981 A
4314268 Yoshioka et al. Feb 1982 A
4317273 Guterman et al. Mar 1982 A
4322736 Sasaki et al. Mar 1982 A
4374454 Jochems Feb 1983 A
4409434 Basset et al. Oct 1983 A
4435895 Parillo Mar 1984 A
4471376 Morcom et al. Sep 1984 A
4581628 Miyauchi et al. Apr 1986 A
4583011 Pechar Apr 1986 A
4603381 Guttag et al. Jul 1986 A
4623255 Suszko Nov 1986 A
4727493 Taylor, Sr. Feb 1988 A
4766516 Ozdemir et al. Aug 1988 A
4799096 Koeppe Jan 1989 A
4821085 Haken et al. Apr 1989 A
4830974 Chang et al. May 1989 A
4939567 Kenney Jul 1990 A
4958222 Takakura et al. Sep 1990 A
4962484 Takeshima et al. Oct 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
4998151 Korman et al. Mar 1991 A
5030796 Swanson et al. Jul 1991 A
5050123 Castro Sep 1991 A
5061978 Mizutani et al. Oct 1991 A
5065208 Shah et al. Nov 1991 A
5068697 Noda et al. Nov 1991 A
5070378 Yamagata Dec 1991 A
5101121 Sourgen Mar 1992 A
5117276 Thomas et al. May 1992 A
5121089 Larson et al. Jun 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5132571 McCollum et al. Jul 1992 A
5138197 Kuwana Aug 1992 A
5146117 Larson Sep 1992 A
5168340 Nishimura Dec 1992 A
5177589 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1993 A
5202591 Walden Apr 1993 A
5225699 Nakamura Jul 1993 A
5227649 Chapman Jul 1993 A
5231299 Ning et al. Jul 1993 A
5302539 Haken et al. Apr 1994 A
5308682 Morikawa May 1994 A
5309015 Kuwata et al. May 1994 A
5317197 Roberts May 1994 A
5336624 Walden Aug 1994 A
5341013 Koyanagi et al. Aug 1994 A
5345105 Sun et al. Sep 1994 A
5354704 Yang et al. Oct 1994 A
5369299 Byrne et al. Nov 1994 A
5371390 Mohsen Dec 1994 A
5376577 Roberts et al. Dec 1994 A
5384472 Yin Jan 1995 A
5399441 Bearinger et al. Mar 1995 A
5404040 Hshieh et al. Apr 1995 A
5412237 Komori et al. May 1995 A
5441902 Hsieh et al. Aug 1995 A
5468990 Daum Nov 1995 A
5475251 Kuo et al. Dec 1995 A
5506806 Fukushima Apr 1996 A
5531018 Saia et al. Jul 1996 A
5539224 Ema Jul 1996 A
5541614 Lam et al. Jul 1996 A
5571735 Mogami et al. Nov 1996 A
5576988 Kuo et al. Nov 1996 A
5611940 Zettler Mar 1997 A
5638946 Zavracky Jun 1997 A
5677557 Wuu et al. Oct 1997 A
5679595 Chen et al. Oct 1997 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5719430 Goto Feb 1998 A
5721150 Pasch Feb 1998 A
5783846 Baukus et al. Jul 1998 A
5821590 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5838047 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1998 A
5854510 Sur, Jr. et al. Dec 1998 A
5866933 Baukus et al. Feb 1999 A
5880503 Matsumoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5888887 Li et al. Mar 1999 A
5895241 Lu et al. Apr 1999 A
5920097 Horne Jul 1999 A
5930663 Baukus et al. Jul 1999 A
5930667 Oda Jul 1999 A
5973375 Baukus et al. Oct 1999 A
5977593 Hara Nov 1999 A
5998257 Lane et al. Dec 1999 A
6037627 Kitamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6046659 Loo et al. Apr 2000 A
6054659 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6057520 Goodwin-Johansson May 2000 A
6093609 Chuang Jul 2000 A
6117762 Baukus et al. Sep 2000 A
6137318 Takaaki Oct 2000 A
6154388 Oh Nov 2000 A
6165861 Liu et al. Dec 2000 A
6215158 Choi Apr 2001 B1
6255155 Lee et al. Jul 2001 B1
6294816 Baukus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6326675 Scott et al. Dec 2001 B1
6365453 Deboer et al. Apr 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
0 186 855 Jul 1986 EP
0 364 769 Apr 1990 EP
0 463 373 Jan 1992 EP
0 528 302 Feb 1993 EP
0 585 601 Mar 1994 EP
0 764 985 Mar 1997 EP
0 883 184 Dec 1998 EP
0 920 057 Jun 1999 EP
1 193 758 Apr 2002 EP
1 202 353 May 2002 EP
2486717 Jan 1982 FR
58-190064 Nov 1983 JP
61-147551 Jul 1986 JP
63 129647 Jun 1988 JP
02-046762 Feb 1990 JP
02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
10-256398 Sep 1998 JP
9821734 May 1998 WO
9857373 Dec 1998 WO
0044012 Jul 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020096776 A1 Jul 2002 US