This section is intended to provide background information to facilitate a better understanding of various technologies described herein. As the section's title implies, this is a discussion of related art. That such art is related in no way implies that it is prior art. The related art may or may not be prior art. It should therefore be understood that the statements in this section are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
There are two types of concrete construction that require some form of formwork: vertical formwork and shoring. Vertical formwork provides the ability to form structures that hold vertical loads. Shoring provides the ability to form structures that hold horizontal loads. Vertical structures like walls, columns and foundations require formwork, and horizontal structures like slabs, beams and girders require shoring to cast them into place as an elevated structural component. Examples where shoring provides horizontal concrete members include: slabs, horizontal concrete girders, cross-t's under highways, etc.
Many companies in existence today have developed specific independent formwork systems and independent shoring systems. They generally carry a sizable inventory of several different types that are both rented and sold to contractors who build concrete structures.
The applications of formwork and shoring are unlimited given the wide range of project types in both the industrial and commercial construction markets. From high-rise buildings, to the construction of an industrial facility, formwork and shoring are used to help contractors cast foundations, columns, walls, elevated slabs and elevated beams in an enormous variety of shapes and uses. Chances are that all of the buildings in which people live and work have some sort of poured in-place concrete that was casted using a formwork system.
Older generation systems required formwork and shoring providers to have significantly large inventories of parts in order to make up the variety of configurations necessary. Those systems consisted of endless amounts of components used by a building contractor. Along with the large amount of inventory items, the assembly efficiency for those systems was often on the low side, as compared to systems in use today. Due to the large amount of pieces, it was common for many of these items to be lost during the construction process.
Described herein are various implementations of an integrated construction system. In one implementation, the integrated construction system includes a first panel for a formwork configuration of the integrated construction system, a second panel for a shoring configuration of the integrated construction system, and a third panel for a worker access configuration of the integrated construction system. The first panel, the second panel and the third panel are the same panel type.
In one implementation, the panel type may be a form panel. The form panel may be an aluminum form panel. In one implementation, the second panel may supported by a header beam in the shoring configuration. The header beam may be coupled to a plurality of posts. The header beam may be an aluminum header beam and the plurality of posts may be a plurality of aluminum posts. At least one bracing assembly may be coupled between the plurality of posts. The at least one bracing assembly may include a first modular ledger, a second modular ledger, and at least one ledger strut. The bracing assembly may include two ledger struts and ledger brace members.
In one implementation, the panel type may be a modular ledger. In the shoring configuration, the second panel may be part of a bracing assembly. The bracing assembly may include: the second panel, a fourth panel comprising the same panel type, and at least one ledger strut. The bracing assembly may include two ledger struts and ledger brace members.
In the worker access configuration, the third panel and a fifth panel may be part of a second bracing assembly, the fifth panel being the same panel type. A sixth panel may be coupled to the second bracing assembly to form an outer wall of the worker access configuration, the sixth panel being the same panel type. A plurality of modular ledger panels may be coupled together and are coupled to the second bracing assembly to form an outer wall of the worker access configuration. The plurality of modular ledger panels may be coupled together using a ledger splice.
A plurality of joists may be coupled to a top surface of the second bracing assembly. The plurality of joists can support a platform that provides worker access.
Described herein are various implementations of a method for providing an integrated construction system. A first panel for a formwork configuration of the integrated construction system is provided. A second panel for a shoring configuration of the integrated construction system is provided. A third panel for a worker access configuration of the integrated construction system is provided. The first panel, the second panel and the third panel are a same panel type
The above referenced summary section is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description section. Additional concepts and various other implementations are also described in the detailed description. The summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to limit the number of inventions described herein. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
Implementations of various techniques will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying drawings illustrate only the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various techniques described herein.
The integrated construction system of the present disclosure was designed to rectify many of the shortcomings conventional systems, including to further reduce the amount of components needed and maintain a high degree of versatility. In addition, the present integrated construction system is primarily built from non-welded lightweight aluminum components, with minimal steel items used for various fittings and connectors.
As stated above, prior art forming and shoring systems were designed to be independent. Besides the integrated construction system described in the present disclosure and the system disclosed in Applicant's related co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/630,923, which is herein incorporated by reference, there is no integrated system disclosed in the prior art where standard elements of the integrated system can be used in both a formwork system configuration and a shoring system configuration. The present integrated construction system functions as one complete system for both vertical and horizontal aspects of concrete construction. The present integrated construction system can also be configured to provide a heavy-duty access or scaffolding system.
The present disclosure provides a shoring system that is part of a larger integrated construction system. This shoring system includes several key unique features that are not found in similar systems currently available in the market. These unique features are outlined below.
None of the prior art individual construction systems provides a system that provides the aspects of formwork, shoring and provision of safe worker access during construction. The present integrated construction system forms part of a complete “construction system” offering that satisfies all three of the aforementioned aspects of construction.
In one implementation, the present integrated construction system provides aluminum extruded posts with mechanically fastened cast fittings. Prior art modular aluminum shoring systems have bracing ledger and base attachment aluminum welded fittings. However, many of the prior art shoring systems do not have ledger fittings and, therefore, do not provide any capacity for the ledgers to carry any appreciable load. The present shoring systems provide post fittings attached with mechanical fasteners that are designed to carry loads for multiple situations.
In one implementation, the present integrated construction system provides a multipurpose aluminum and steel modular ledger. The ledgers may be made from a hybrid of aluminum and steel components vs. welded aluminum.
The ledgers can be configured into a variety of assemblies for a multitude of applications vs. static sized bracing panels. The ledgers are designed to act as a truss or load bearing member vs. being used solely as a bracing and spacing member.
The ledger post connections have a removable series of end connections for various uses. The ledger post connections are not permanently mounted and are designed for multiple purposes as opposed to being designed for a single purpose.
The modular ledger is designed to be useable as: a bracing/spacing panel between vertical posts; a headload or truss shoring member that can hold up shoring loads in a variety of situations; an access platform for vertical shearwall construction; a roof truss system for large enclosures; and a perimeter safety deck system for construction worker access.
In one implementation, the present integrated construction system provides safety deck solutions for worker access. Safe construction worker access is an important aspect of all high-rise concrete construction projects. The present integrated construction system provides safe worker access to the outer perimeter of floor slab construction during all phases of: a floor pour, shoring setup, slab pour, post-tensioning slab cables, and continuous setup of the next level of shoring. Prior art systems use the actual slab shoring structure to give workers access to the perimeter of the top floor under construction. The problem with the prior art is that once the shoring is stripped, there is no effective means of access to the outer perimeter of a previously constructed floor slab. The issues present in prior art worker access slow down the construction cycle. The present integrated construction system provides perimeter deck access that is provided using components of the integrated construction system but independent of the shoring deck itself, to give worker access to the outer perimeter of the work. This allows the lower level access to remain in place to allow workers continued perimeter access to lower levels, while the upper level construction continues.
In one implementation, the present integrated construction system provides applications for heavy duty access. Conventional scaffolding systems are generally used to give workers access to general construction tasks. However, when the applications become extremely high or when the system incurs higher than normal loading conditions, other means of worker access are generally required. The present integrated construction system is able to provide worker access in higher than normal loading situations, while still meeting all OSHA access regulations.
In one implementation, the present integrated construction system provides heavy duty enclosures. Enclosures or containment structures are a common form of providing environmentally controlled spaces when critical construction processes require weather or other forms of climate protection. When these enclosure structures become large or subjected to high external forces, such as wind, most conventional scaffolding systems do not have the ability to perform in these high external force conditions. The present integrated construction system is able to sustain higher than normal loads and can be configured to provide larger than normal containment structures.
In one implementation, a mega-shore application is provided. Most prior art shoring systems have either a light or medium duty rating. Other prior art shoring systems may have heavy or very heavy-duty ratings. No prior art system can function across all rating ranges. Posts coupled to a mega-shore bearing plate can be configured in a variety of ways to achieve each level of duty rating. This includes the ability to cluster posts in groups to achieve very high loads in excess of 100,000 lbs. per shore location.
An example of a perimeter safety deck system 135 is also shown in
Screw legs 255 are provided in various lengths and are used to adjust a height of the vertical post. The height of the post may be adjusted by using the screw legs on one or both ends of the vertical post. The bearing plate 220, mega-shore bearing plate 225, slope bracket 230, post hinge 235, screw leg connector clips 240, swivel caster shoe 245, and deck drophead 250 are used with the vertical posts to provide various shoring application configurations.
As also described above in
The post 305 is configured to be a complete extruded piece, e.g., constructed of aluminum. The post 305 is cut to a specific length. A groove is lathed into the circumference of the post 305 at predetermined locations along the post. In one implementation, the groove is lathed into the post every 12 inches. In one implementation, the groove is a ½ inch cut groove. The fitting ring 307 slides down the post and twists into place at each groove. View 320 shows the fitting ring 307 being twisted into the groove (not shown). View 320 shows a circular shaft portion 335 of the post 305. View 320 also shows an outer rib portion 337 of the post 305 that remains below the groove. The groove is cut on the vertical ribs of the extrusion, not on the circular shaft. In one implementation, screws may fasten the fittings into place to prevent them from moving.
View 310 and 315 are top and side views of the fitting ring 307, respectively. As previously described, the rings are twisted into place as shown in view 320 and mechanically fastened as shown in view 325, e.g., using screw 330.
Configuring posts in the manner described above allows for the installation of posts and ledgers without welding. In addition, configuring posts in this manner further allows posts to take a load. Prior art systems don't allow a ledger to put a load from a ledger onto a post.
Shoring is generally used repetitively from one concrete pour to the next. In typical prior art shoring systems, the shoring system is completely disassembled and then re-assembled on the next position. The present integrated construction system provides the ability to keep much of the setup intact and fly the assembly with a crane from one setup to the next to reduce labor costs. The screw leg clips allow the screw legs to remain attached to the posts, so the screw legs will still turn for adjustment, but also provide the ability to move the post and screw leg as a unit from one pour to the next without being disassembled.
Another portion of
As shown in the various views, the modular posts can be used with the same multi-purpose bearing plate to provide different applications.
In one implementation, standard aluminum form panels used in a drop deck shoring application can be easily stripped from the finished concrete pour while leaving the shoring posts in place as re-shoring for the next elevated pour. Re-shoring is used to support fresh concrete floor slabs from underneath while shoring is placed on top for the next elevated floor slab pour.
The wall form and work platform can be picked up with a crane as a unit and landed onto a bracket at the next elevation. The wall form and work platform also allow the crane rigging to be released safely by the construction workers. The crane rigging is released more safely because the form panel seats itself onto the bracket securely and uses gravity to hold it in-place without human interaction. This allows the workers to access the platform safely to remove the rigging and complete the next wall pour.
In one implementation, the posts are all aluminum. The fittings may be cast steel or cast aluminum. With respect to the bracing assembly, the ledger panels are made of aluminum. The end fittings with the screw mechanism may be steel. The vertical struts may be steel. The cross brace may be an aluminum strap. In this manner, the bracing assembly can be a combination of aluminum and steel. The present shoring system does not use any welded aluminum.
The present shoring system includes a number of advantages and benefits. The present shoring system is part of a larger integrated construction system that provides a total solution for formwork, shoring and heavy-duty access. This new larger integrated construction system has significantly less items in its usable inventory, as compared to other independent task focused systems, i.e., prior art independent formwork systems, prior art independent shoring systems, and prior art independent heavy-duty access systems. The present integrated construction system has a unique approach to the type of materials used in its construction, as well as the method of manufacture. The present integrated construction system, by design, minimizes the number of separate components needed to provide shoring, formwork and worker access application. The integrated construction system further provides a unique method of manufacturing the integrated construction system components.
The integration of formwork, shoring and heavy-duty access into one system creates a unique and singular approach for providing a “construction system” vs. individual systems that are designed to handle one of the three applications. The present integrated construction system reduces the amount of inventoried components by over 75%, as compared to existing systems. In addition, this unique combination of components provides new innovative methods to construction worker access that is currently not available on elevated construction sites.
In combination with the robust nature of the materials of the integrated construction system and the method of assembly, the cost to own the present integrated construction system is vastly reduced for both a dead asset basis, as well as the physical maintenance cost required to maintain a formwork and access inventory. In addition, the integrated construction system provides an increased flexibility to handle field applications, as well as increase the efficiency for the contractors that will use the integrated construction system to build concrete structures.
The discussion above is directed to certain specific implementations. It is to be understood that the discussion above is only for the purpose of enabling a person with ordinary skill in the art to make and use any subject matter defined now or later by the patent “claims” found in any issued patent herein.
It is specifically intended that the claimed invention not be limited to the implementations and illustrations contained herein, but include modified forms of those implementations including portions of the implementations and combinations of elements of different implementations as come within the scope of the following claims. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions may be made to achieve the developers'specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure. Nothing in this application is considered critical or essential to the claimed invention unless explicitly indicated as being “critical” or “essential.”
In the above detailed description, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, circuits and networks have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments.
It will also be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first object or step could be termed a second object or step, and, similarly, a second object or step could be termed a first object or step, without departing from the scope of the invention. The first object or step, and the second object or step, are both objects or steps, respectively, but they are not to be considered the same object or step.
The terminology used in the description of the present disclosure herein is for the purpose of describing particular implementations only and is not intended to be limiting of the present disclosure. As used in the description of the present disclosure and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be understood that the term “and/or” as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and/or groups thereof.
As used herein, the term “if” may be construed to mean “when” or “upon” or “in response to determining” or “in response to detecting,” depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase “if it is determined” or “if [a stated condition or event] is detected” may be construed to mean “upon determining” or “in response to determining” or “upon detecting [the stated condition or event]” or “in response to detecting [the stated condition or event],” depending on the context. As used herein, the terms “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; “upwardly” and downwardly”; “below” and “above”; and other similar terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element may be used in connection with some implementations of various technologies described herein.
While the foregoing is directed to implementations of various techniques described herein, other and further implementations may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, which may be determined by the claims that follow. Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/630,923, filed Jun. 22, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/471,173, filed Mar. 14, 2017, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/354,325, filed Jun. 24, 2016, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1890386 | Kingston | Dec 1928 | A |
1890336 | Nodine | Dec 1932 | A |
1919405 | Wilson | Jul 1933 | A |
2382201 | Burke et al. | Aug 1945 | A |
3222829 | Bening | Dec 1965 | A |
3288427 | Pluckebaum | Nov 1966 | A |
3462110 | Cheslock | Aug 1969 | A |
3491852 | Leist | Jan 1970 | A |
3550723 | Gentry et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3559357 | Lowe | Feb 1971 | A |
3578060 | Spencer | May 1971 | A |
3815858 | Mocny | Jun 1974 | A |
3900179 | Mocny | Aug 1975 | A |
4036466 | Van Meter | Jul 1977 | A |
4102096 | Cody | Jul 1978 | A |
4106256 | Cody | Aug 1978 | A |
4133433 | Wolf | Jan 1979 | A |
4162682 | Miller | Jul 1979 | A |
4163537 | Mourgue | Aug 1979 | A |
4194338 | Trafton | Mar 1980 | A |
4473209 | Gallis et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4516372 | Grutsch | May 1985 | A |
4582001 | Leikarts | Apr 1986 | A |
4587786 | Woods | May 1986 | A |
4685264 | Landis | Aug 1987 | A |
4761847 | Savage | Aug 1988 | A |
4805365 | Bastian | Feb 1989 | A |
4813196 | Bokelund et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5078360 | Spera | Jan 1992 | A |
5150557 | Gregory | Sep 1992 | A |
5192145 | Rixen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5219473 | Sandwith | Jun 1993 | A |
5228258 | Onoda et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5367852 | Masuda | Nov 1994 | A |
5549176 | Hawkins | Aug 1996 | A |
5641036 | Maxwell | Jun 1997 | A |
5729948 | Levy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746535 | Kohler | May 1998 | A |
6106186 | Taipale et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6161359 | Ono | Dec 2000 | A |
6321501 | Ignash | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6712543 | Schmalzhofer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7096641 | Birnbaum et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7178765 | Huang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7950199 | Newhouse et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8136633 | Rogers | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8635820 | Lafferty, III | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8869477 | Ha et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9074379 | Ciuperca | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9153860 | Tserodze et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9249565 | Merrifield | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9388561 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9587298 | Lin et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9719267 | Rogers | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020092961 | Gallis | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040055249 | Kennedy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040200172 | Beck | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040237437 | Hur | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050217040 | Jackson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060011802 | Di Cesare | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060042179 | Vanagan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070021048 | Henning | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080017783 | Vanagan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080210725 | Birtwisle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090212195 | Arocena Bergareche | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090301815 | Rogers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100224447 | Rogers | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110011018 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120025058 | Floreani | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120112376 | Khoo | May 2012 | A1 |
20130036688 | Gosain | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130043095 | Thacker | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140020982 | Hayman et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021424 | Ramskov | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140086669 | Rogers | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140228060 | Abhyanker | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140361144 | Mcgahan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150211242 | Rosati | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150337548 | Ciuperca | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160102462 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160244984 | Hollmann | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170370099 | Chevis | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1188175 | Jul 1998 | CN |
103899083 | Jul 2014 | CN |
203878831 | Oct 2014 | CN |
204386134 | Jun 2015 | CN |
202009010716 | Nov 2009 | DE |
0 408 209 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 729 536 | Sep 1996 | EP |
2 462 296 | Jun 2012 | EP |
1465950 | Mar 1977 | GB |
H 07-279411 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H 10-46806 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2002-256700 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004-156416 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2009127315 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2016-532026 | Oct 2016 | JP |
10-0682310 | Feb 2007 | KR |
20-0463949 | Dec 2012 | KR |
2015-0116373 | Oct 2015 | KR |
2007-043897 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2012-096639 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2017/039097; dated Sep. 11, 2017. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2018/066256; dated Apr. 11, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180106055 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62471173 | Mar 2017 | US | |
62354325 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15630923 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 15845962 | US |