Integrated delivery and visualization tool for a neuromodulation system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8412336
  • Patent Number
    8,412,336
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 29, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for delivering a neurostimulator to a target tissue are provided which may include any number of features. One feature is a delivery tool comprising a handle portion, an elongate shaft comprising a contoured distal portion, a visualization system embedded in the elongate shaft, and an insertion groove on the elongate shaft configured to deploy the neurostimulator. The contoured distal portion can be shaped and configured to maintain contact with a posterior maxilla and elevate a periosteum off of the posterior maxilla to avoid soft tissue dissection. In some embodiments, the neurostimulator is implanted in close proximity to or touching the sphenopalatine ganglion.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, including patents and patent applications, mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to a surgical tool and visualization method for delivering a therapy delivery device to craniofacial regions, and more specifically to a surgical tool and integral visualization method for delivery of a neurostimulator device to the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF).


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Electrical stimulation of peripheral and central neural structures has shown increased interest due to the potential benefits it may provide to individuals suffering from many neurological and behavioral diseases. Many of these therapies today are not well accepted due to the invasive nature of the therapy, even though the efficacy is quite good. This has created a need for less invasive therapies that are directed toward patient and physician clinical needs.


Headaches are one of the most debilitating ailments that afflict millions of individuals worldwide. The specific pathophysiology of headaches is unknown. Known sources of headache pain consist of trauma, vascular, autoimmune, degenerative, infectious, drug and medication-induced, inflammatory, neoplastic, metabolic-endocrine, iatrogenic, musculoskeletal and myofacial causes. Also, even though the possible underlying cause of the headache pain is identified and treated, the headache pain may persist.


Currently, the sphenopalatine (pterygopalatine) ganglion (SPG) is a target of manipulation in clinical medicine to treat headaches. The SPG is an extracranial neuronal center located behind the nose. It consists of parasympathetic neurons that innervate (in part) the middle cerebral and anterior cerebral blood vessels, the facial blood vessels, and the lacrimal glands. The SPG also consists of sympathetic and sensory nerve fibers that pass through the SPG in route to their end organs. Manipulation of the SPG is mostly performed in attempted treatments of severe headaches, such as cluster headaches or chronic migraines.


Various clinical approaches have been used for over 100 years to modulate the function of the SPG to treat headaches. These procedures vary from least invasive (e.g. transnasal anesthetic blocks) to much more invasive (e.g. surgical ganglionectomy) as well as procedures such as surgical anesthetic injections, ablations, gamma knife and cryogenic surgery. Most of these procedures have very good short term efficacy outcomes (days to months), however these results are usually temporary and the headache pain returns. A chronically implanted SPG neurostimulator may provide much better long term efficacy in these patients.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, a method of delivering a neurostimulator to within close proximity of a sphenopalatine ganglion is provided, comprising making an incision over the anterior maxilla, inserting a delivery tool having an integrated visualization system into the incision, visualizing tissue near a distal portion of the delivery tool with the visualization system, advancing the delivery tool sub-periosteally at a lateral edge of a zygomaticomaxillary buttress region towards a pterygopalatine fossa, and delivering the neurostimulator in close proximity to the sphenopalatine ganglion.


The method can further comprise the step of elevating a periosteum away from the anterior maxilla with the delivery tool to expose a zygomaticomaxillary buttress region prior to the advancing step. In some embodiments, the advancing step further comprises advancing the delivery tool posteriorly, medially, and superiorly towards the pterygopalatine fossa.


In one embodiment, the delivery tool includes a contoured distal portion that is shaped and configured to maintain contact with a posterior maxilla and elevate a periosteum off of the posterior maxilla to avoid soft tissue dissection. The contoured distal portion can have a thickness of between 2-5 mm, for example. In some embodiments, the contoured distal portion has an elliptical cross-section.


In one embodiment, the visualization system comprises a fiberscope.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of illuminating the delivery tool with a light source placed within a nasal cavity and positioned close to or within a sphenopalatine foramen.


A delivery tool configured to deliver a neurostimulator into a patient is also provided, comprising a handle portion, an elongate shaft comprising a contoured distal portion, the contoured distal portion shaped and configured to maintain contact with a posterior maxilla and elevate a periosteum off of the posterior maxilla to avoid soft tissue dissection, a visualization system embedded in the elongate shaft, and an insertion groove on the elongate shaft configured to deploy the neurostimulator.


In some embodiments, the insertion groove is recessed into the elongate shaft. In other embodiments, the insertion groove is located on an opposing edge of the delivery tool from the visualization system, allowing for visualization of the deployment of the neurostimulator.


In some embodiments, the visualization system is a fiberscope. In other embodiments, the visualization system comprises a light source contained in the handle portion.


In one embodiment, the delivery tool further comprises a lens embedded at the distal portion, the lens constructed to allow for a focal length of between 2-15 mm.


In other embodiments, the visualization system is configured to highlight differences between soft tissue and bone. In another embodiment, the visualization system comprises an electronic chip positioned within the distal portion and configured to provide video and/or still images to be sent to a viewing system.


In one embodiment, the delivery tool further comprises an external light source configured to provide transillumination of the delivery tool. In another embodiment, the delivery tool further comprises an aperture configured to dispense a fluid to a distal end of the delivery tool. The delivery tool can further comprise a touch sensitive button coupled to the aperture, wherein a quick press of the button releases a bolus of fluid and a long press of the button releases a continuous stream of fluid.


In some embodiments, the delivery tool further comprises a bifurcated distal dissecting tip having a lens positioned between the dissecting tips.


In additional embodiments, the delivery tool further comprises a tissue clearance tip around the visualization system configured to provide increased tissue clearance around the visualization system.


In some embodiments, the contoured distal portion has a thickness of between 2-5 mm. In other embodiments, the contoured distal portion has an elliptical cross-section.


A method of treating a neurological disorder is also provided, comprising making an incision over an anterior maxilla, inserting a delivery tool having an integrated visualization system into the incision, visualizing tissue near a distal portion of the delivery tool with the visualization system, advancing the delivery tool sub-periosteally at a lateral edge of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress region towards the pterygopalatine fossa, delivering the neurostimulator in close proximity to the sphenopalatine ganglion, and applying an electrical current from the neurostimulator to the sphenopalatine ganglion to treat the neurological disorder.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of elevating a periosteum away from the anterior maxilla with the delivery tool to expose a zygomaticomaxillary buttress region prior to the advancing step.


In another embodiment, the delivery tool includes a contoured distal portion that is shaped and configured to maintain contact with a posterior maxilla and elevate a periosteum off of the posterior maxilla to avoid soft tissue dissection.


In some embodiments, the neurological disorder is headache.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a lateral looking view of the target anatomy.



FIG. 2 is a front looking view of a delivery and visualization tool.



FIG. 3 is an isometric view of the integral delivery and visualization tool.



FIG. 4
a is a detailed isometric view of the distal tip of the tool.



FIG. 4
b is a cross-section of the distal tip of the tool.



FIG. 5 is an isometric view of an alternate embodiment of a bifurcated distal tip of the tool.



FIG. 6 is an isometric view of a lens covering shown engaging the fiber lens on the distal tip of the tool.



FIG. 7 is an enlarged isometric view of an alternate embodiment of the distal tip housing a digital video camera.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of an integrated delivery and visualization tool 100 shown positioned within the craniofacial anatomy. The tool can be used in aided delivery of a small neurostimulator for the treatment of chronic headaches. The tool is designed and constructed to elevate and or dissect the periosteum and soft tissue, and to visualize the intended anatomy, as illustrated in FIG. 1, during delivery of the neurostimulator. The tool is designed to be inserted trans-orally from an incision located on the anterior maxilla 101. The tool can then elevate the periosteum away from the anterior maxilla bone 101 to expose the zygomaticomaxillary buttress region 103. The tool can then be inserted sub-periosteally at the lateral edge of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and advanced posteriorly, medially, and superiorly towards the PPF 104. The SPG 105, a small extracranial autonomic ganglion, is located within the PPF. The SPG is the intended target for stimulation for the treatment of headaches and other neurological disorders. This tool is designed and configured to deliver the neurostimulator in very close proximity to the SPG, by contacting the SPG directly or by placing the neurostimulator within 1-5 mm of the SPG, such that targeted electrical stimulation or delivery of electrical current from the neurostimulator to the SPG can be accomplished.


In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, the tool 100 features an elongate shaft comprising a compound-contoured distal portion 110 with an integral visualization system 140. Using an integral visualization system in the delivery tool advantageously reduces or eliminates radiation exposure in the patient since fewer or no x-rays or fluoroscopy are needed. The tool can be made of surgical grade stainless steel, for example. In one embodiment the tool is approximately 15-40 cm in length, excluding the visualization viewing system attachments. The distal portion 110 of the tool can be shaped and configured such that a user can maintain contact with the posterior maxilla while advancing the tool sub-periosteally to the pterygopalatine fossa. The tool is shaped and designed to maintain bone contact and elevate the periosteum off the bone to avoid soft tissue dissection, which may prevent unwanted soft tissue injury or bleeding during the implantation of a neurostimulator. Additionally, by remaining sub-periosteal, a higher contrast between the bone and the soft tissue overlaying the periosteum can make visualization easier.


In one embodiment, the visualization system comprises a fiberscope 140 embedded into the elongate shaft of the delivery tool, as shown in FIG. 3. The fiberscope allows for both illumination and visualization of tissue near the distal end of the delivery tool. The fiberscope can contain two types of fiber optic bundles, such as fiber optic light bundles for illumination and fiber optic image bundles to relay images to the viewing system. The number of fibers within the fiberscope visualization system is dependent on the overall diameter of each fiber and the overall diameter of the fiberscope, which is dependent on the size and shape of the delivery tool.


In some embodiments, the delivery tool's distal portion 110 can have a thickness of between 2-5 mm, with a fiberscope diameter that corresponds to the thickness of the delivery tool (2-5 mm). More specifically, the distal portion of the tool can be 3 mm thick with a fiberscope diameter of 2 mm. The tool's distal portion 110 can have a radius of curvature ranging from 8 cm to 0.3 cm. In one specific embodiment, the radius of curvature of the distal portion can be approximately 4.5 cm, and in another embodiment, the radius of curvature of the tool's distal portion can be nearly flat. The illumination fibers within the fiberscope can accommodate a number of different light sources, including, but not limited to, white, red, blue, green, infrared, and near infrared light sources. In some embodiments, the light sources are contained within the delivery tool and more specifically within the handle of the delivery tool.


The light sources may be light emitting diodes or other standard light sources that can be contained in the handle of the delivery tool. Also in some embodiments, the light sources are selectable as individual sources or in combination sources used in conjunction. The different light sources may allow for differentiation of different tissue types, for example, bone, fat, blood vessels, and nerves, where blue light is preferred for achieving good contrast between nerves and other tissues.


A lens can also be embedded at the distal portion of the delivery tool, the lens being constructed to allow for maximum viewing angle at the tip of the delivery tool. In some embodiments, the lens can allow for a focal length of between 2-15 mm. More specifically, since the depth of the PPF is variable but likely between 10 and 20 mm deep, and the location of the SPG within the PPF is between 4 and 10 mm from the medial wall of the PPF, a viewing distance or focal length of 5-7 mm will likely cover the range needed with the distal portion of the delivery tool at or just within the opening of the PPF.


The fiberscope can then be attached to a viewing system 150, as shown in FIG. 3. The viewing system 150 can be a standard video display with the necessary electronics to convert the image from the fiberscope to a real time video display. Alternatively, a customized viewing system can be made that includes advanced image processing capabilities to help guide implantation, for example, by highlighting the differences between soft tissue and bone. The advanced image processing may include the ability to detect and process non-visible wavelengths, such as, but not limited to, infrared and near-infrared.


In an alternative embodiment, a separate light source may be used in conjunction with or solely to help illuminate and visualize the target anatomy. The PPF is located behind the nose and is constrained anteriorly by the posterior maxilla, medially by the sphenoid bone, posteriorly by the pterygoid process and laterally open to the infratemporal fossa. Additionally the PPF can be accessed from the nasal cavity via the sphenopalatine foramen or laterally from the infratemporal fossa. A light source can be placed within the nasal cavity and positioned close to or within the sphenopalatine foramen to provide illumination of the tool. The light source can include, but is not limited to, white, red, blue, green, infrared, and near infrared light sources. Additionally, to aid in the placement of the neurostimulator within very close proximity to the SPG, additional working channels can be utilized though the nasal cavity for additional tools to help pull the neurostimulator into the correct placement or make small adjustments to the final location of the neurostimulator.


In an additional embodiment, an external bright light source may also be used in conjunction with or solely to help illuminate and visualize the target anatomy. The PPF is open on its lateral aspect to the infratemporal fossa, thus a bright light may be placed on the external skin, and more specifically, on the cheek or forehead either in or out of a dark room to transilluminate the target anatomy PPF. Transillumination is a procedure used for medical diagnostic purposes to visualize the maxillary and frontal sinuses to rule out any problems in these areas. Since the PPF is located just posterior to the maxillary sinus and inferior to the frontal sinuses, transillumination in this area may provide an adequate light source for visualization of the PPF and more specifically the SPG. The bright light source used can include, but is not limited to, white, red, blue, green, infrared, and near infrared light sources.


The compound-contoured distal portion comprises a curvilinear body having an elliptical cross-section, with a sharpened edge at the distal tip of the curvilinear body that is configured to contact the bone and dissect through the tissue. The distal edge can be configured and shaped to traverse around the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and under the zygomatic bone along the posterior maxilla and into the pterygopalatine fossa, while maintaining contact with the posterior maxilla 102, as labeled in FIG. 1, and lifting the periosteum off the posterior maxilla.


According to this embodiment the tool can also include an insertion groove 120 in the elongate shaft. The insertion groove is recessed into the elongate shaft and configured to guide and/or deploy the neurostimulator into the pterygopalatine fossa to within close proximity of the target neural anatomy, such as the SPG. Once the tool is place in position within the PPF and in close proximity to the SPG, the distal end of the neurostimulator is placed within the proximal portion of the insertion groove on the tool and advanced. The neurostimulator is advanced by pushing the neurostimulator along the insertion groove into the PPF. In one embodiment, the insertion groove 120 is located on the opposing edge of the delivery tool from the fiberscope and fiberscope lens 140, allowing for visualization of the deployment of the neurostimulator into the target anatomy.


Also according to this embodiment, the tool incorporates an ergonomic handle 130 of approximately 6-12 cm in length, varying in diameter from proximal (0.5-3 cm) to distal (0.5-2 cm), with variable methods to provide grip and tactile manual maneuverability, such as circumferential ridges or cross-hatched precut pattern into the surgical grade stainless steel. In one embodiment, the handle and shaft of the delivery tool can contain the flexible fiberscope within the body of the tool.



FIG. 4
a shows a close-up view of the curvilinear geometry of the distal portion 110 of the integral delivery and visualization tool 100. As illustrated in FIG. 4a, the tool incorporates an insertion or deployment groove 120, a tissue dissecting tip 160, an integral fiberscope visualization system 170, and an aperture 180. The aperture can be used to dispense saline to the distal tip of the tool, providing a gap between the tissue and the visualization system's lens. A piece of plastic (or other transparent material) can also provide a gap between the lens and the tissue. The aperture could also be used to remove fluid from the tip of the device, for example, blood.


The delivery of fluid through the aperture can be done from a syringe based system, which can be attached to the delivery tool. However, in one embodiment, the delivery and visualization tool maintains a refillable volume of fluid within the handle. The fluid can be deployed into the visualization field using an integral button on the handle of the delivery tool. The button can be touch sensitive, such that a quick press releases a bolus of fluid into the visualization field, and a long press delivers a continuous stream of fluid into the visualization field to clear and create tissue separation for increased visualization. Alternatively, fluid can be delivered by a control system attached to the tool, or manually by the user, for example, using standard IV drip lines. The stored fluid can be normal saline, or other physiological solutions, such as sterile water. The stored fluid can also be or contain a therapeutic or diagnostic agent, such as but not limited to vasocontrictive agents or a local anesthetic, such as lidocaine, or other types of drugs used to create local anesthetic blocks. The fluid can be delivered from the distal tip of the tool through a larger lumen that contains the fiberscope, according to some embodiments. Alternatively, the fluid can be delivered to the tip of the tool through a small lumen or catheter that is integrated to the shaft of the tool. The same system can also be used to remove fluid, for example, blood or saline, using external suction.


In one embodiment, the distal portion 110 of the tool also incorporates a curvilinear geometry along the axis of the tool. The curvilinear geometry can range between 2.5 cm and 7.5 cm. The distal curve of the tool is designed to allow maximal engagement of the posterior maxilla as the delivery tool is advanced posteriorly, medially and superiorly into the PPF of human patients of different anatomical sizes, while minimizing tissue damage by dissecting the plane between the bone and the periosteum. The sculpted distal portion of the tool tapers to the distal tip, which maintains contact with the bone and can be generally elliptically shaped in cross-section, as shown in FIG. 4b.


In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4b, the embedded fiberscope can be located centrally within a lumen 220 in the cross-section of a delivery tool 200. Also according to this embodiment, the aperture for fluid delivery has a separate lumen 220. In this embodiment each lumen runs the length of the delivery tool. The lumen for the fiberscope and aperture can be located away from the insertion or deployment groove 120.


In FIG. 4b, the distal tip of the integral delivery and visualization system is adapted to taper to a sharp edge that is similar to standard surgical periosteal elevators. At the distal tip, the final 5-15 mm of the tip may have an increased curvature in the same plane as the distal portion curvature of the tool. This increased curvature at the tip is done to allow greater contact with the posterior maxilla as the delivery tool is advanced toward the PPF. Also, this curvature creates increased amount of tissue separation that allows for increased amount of visualization of the target anatomy. Also according to this embodiment and the primary embodiment, as the distal tip tapers to the distal edge, the lumen for the fiberscope is stopped such that the distal edge and the fiberscope lens are not in the same plane, but the fiberscope lens is more proximal from the distal tip. Alternatively, a clear glass can be used to fill in the gap between the distal edge and the lens from the fiberscope, or the gap can be filled in by a custom made lens. In yet another embodiment, individual fibers from the fiberscope can extend to the distal edge of the tool so that no gap exists between the individual fibers and the lens at the distal edge of the tool.


In an alternative embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 5, the tool 100 may include a bifurcated distal dissecting tip 230, with a lens 240 centered or arranged between the tissue dissecting members. Alternate embodiments of the tool include various tips of various shapes and configurations to either bluntly or sharply dissect the periosteum from the bone and include visualization of the target anatomy.


In other embodiments of the tool, the shaft and tool tip can be manufactured from various other materials: metals such as titanium and rigid polymers such as PEEK, polycarbonate, or nylon. The tool may also be made from ceramics such as aluminum oxide or zirconium oxide. Additionally, the tool may be made from combinations of metals, ceramics, plastics or plastic composites. Alternate embodiments of the tool include tips that are removable from the tool for disposal or exchanged for different tip, such as tips with different curvatures, dissecting edges, and visualization lens.


Another embodiment of the integrated delivery and visualization tool includes a fiber optic scope that is used as auxiliary equipment to the tool and engages and disengages as required. The fiber optic scope in this embodiment is used to visualize surrounding tissue and the SPG as the tool advances across the posterior maxilla and into the PPF.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, a distal portion 110 of the tool can support an additional clearance tip 175 configured to provide increased tissue clearance around the fiberscope visualization system for greater visualization of the target tissue. The tissue clearance tip 175 can be fitted onto the tip of the fiberscope and can be made from either polymers or plastics that have an optically transparent and non distorting finish to provide the greatest visualization of the surrounding tissue.


As illustrated in FIG. 7, an alternate embodiment of the distal portion 110 of the tool includes a miniature digital electronic chip 260 and a miniature light emitting diode 270, either integral within the distal portion of the integrated delivery and visualization tool or on the elongate shaft of the tool, and containing a lens or prism and lens that is directed forward to visualize the target anatomy. The digital chip can provide video and or still images to be sent to a viewing system. The digital chip can be linked to the viewer system either using a wired or wireless connection. The viewing system can be a standard external video display, and small handheld display, or integrated into a heads up display located on a pair of glasses worn by the user. The viewing system can be used as part of any or all of the embodiments described in this application.


In an alternate embodiment, either in addition to or instead of the visualization system, a contact switch can be included at or near the distal portion of the delivery tool, such that it is nominally in contact with bone. The switch could be mechanical, like a reed switch, or electrical, like a capacitive proximity sensor, and can communicate contact with bone to the user when deformed. Communication can be achieved audibly, for example with an alarm, visibly, for example with a light, or mechanically, for example with a button that pops up. Further, if a visualization system is being used, an alert can be communicated on the monitoring screen.


In an additional embodiment, the tool may be designed to allow safe transmission of RF (radiofrequency) energy without affecting the safety of the patient or efficacy of the tool. Transmitting RF energy to achieve hemostasis by coagulating bleeding vessels is a common surgical technique. By designing the tool to safely transmit RF energy, the surgeon can coagulate undesirably bleeding vessels and or tissues without removing the tool. In order to achieve this, all but the areas desired for RF delivery would be electrically insulated from the patient and the user to prevent RF energy from affecting undesired areas in the patient or the user.


As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of delivering a neurostimulator to within close proximity of a sphenopalatine ganglion, comprising: making an incision over an anterior maxilla;inserting a delivery tool having an integrated visualization system into the incision;visualizing tissue near a distal portion of the delivery tool with the visualization system;advancing the delivery tool sub-periosteally at a lateral edge of a zygomaticomaxillary buttress region towards a pterygopalatine fossa; anddelivering the neurostimulator in close proximity to the sphenopalatine ganglion.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of elevating a periosteum away from the anterior maxilla with the delivery tool to expose a zygomaticomaxillary buttress region prior to the advancing step.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the advancing step further comprises advancing the delivery tool posteriorly, medially, and superiorly towards the pterygopalatine fossa.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the delivery tool includes a contoured distal portion that is shaped and configured to maintain contact with a posterior maxilla and elevate a periosteum off of the posterior maxilla to avoid soft tissue dissection.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the contoured distal portion has a thickness of between 2-5 mm.
  • 6. The method of claim 4 wherein the contoured distal portion has an elliptical cross-section.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the visualization system comprises a fiberscope.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of illuminating the delivery tool with a light source placed within a nasal cavity and positioned close to or within a sphenopalatine foramen.
  • 9. A method of treating a neurological disorder, comprising: making an incision over an anterior maxilla;inserting a delivery tool having an integrated visualization system into the incision;visualizing tissue near a distal portion of the delivery tool with the visualization system;advancing the delivery tool sub-periosteally at a lateral edge of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress region towards the pterygopalatine fossa;delivering the neurostimulator in close proximity to the sphenopalatine ganglion; andapplying an electrical current from the neurostimulator to the sphenopalatine ganglion to treat the neurological disorder.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising the step of elevating a periosteum away from the anterior maxilla with the delivery tool to expose a zygomaticomaxillary buttress region prior to the advancing step.
  • 11. The method of claim 9 wherein the delivery tool includes a contoured distal portion that is shaped and configured to maintain contact with a posterior maxilla and elevate a periosteum off of the posterior maxilla to avoid soft tissue dissection.
  • 12. The method of claim 9 wherein the neurological disorder is headache.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/141,179, filed Dec. 29, 2008, titled “INTEGRATED DELIVERY AND VISUALIZATION TOOL FOR A NEUROMODULATION SYSTEM.” This application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (294)
Number Name Date Kind
2123980 Warwick Jul 1938 A
2182071 Crossley Dec 1939 A
3357434 Abell Dec 1967 A
3746004 Jankelson Jul 1973 A
3862321 Adams et al. Jan 1975 A
3914283 Okamoto et al. Oct 1975 A
3923060 Ellinwood, Jr. Dec 1975 A
3925469 Adams et al. Dec 1975 A
4073917 Sandberg et al. Feb 1978 A
4102344 Conway et al. Jul 1978 A
4117160 Molnar et al. Sep 1978 A
4147804 Diamond et al. Apr 1979 A
4217349 Katsube et al. Aug 1980 A
4298603 Chang et al. Nov 1981 A
4305402 Katims Dec 1981 A
4352820 Scurlock et al. Oct 1982 A
4379161 Thominet et al. Apr 1983 A
4397845 Allen Aug 1983 A
4441210 Hochmair et al. Apr 1984 A
4495174 Allcock et al. Jan 1985 A
4519400 Brenman et al. May 1985 A
4529601 Broberg et al. Jul 1985 A
4550733 Liss et al. Nov 1985 A
4551453 Marsili Nov 1985 A
4565200 Cosman Jan 1986 A
4592359 Galbraith Jun 1986 A
4622219 Haynes Nov 1986 A
4627438 Liss et al. Dec 1986 A
4632940 Chiarino et al. Dec 1986 A
4646744 Capel Mar 1987 A
4692147 Duggan Sep 1987 A
4695576 af Ekenstam et al. Sep 1987 A
4718423 Willis et al. Jan 1988 A
4727145 Press Feb 1988 A
4776349 Nashef et al. Oct 1988 A
4784142 Liss et al. Nov 1988 A
4830008 Meer May 1989 A
4833149 Press May 1989 A
4856526 Liss et al. Aug 1989 A
4870086 Sandberg Sep 1989 A
4871475 Lubowitz et al. Oct 1989 A
4886493 Yee Dec 1989 A
4920979 Bullara May 1990 A
4937078 Mezei et al. Jun 1990 A
4976711 Parins et al. Dec 1990 A
5038781 Lynch Aug 1991 A
5085868 Mattsson et al. Feb 1992 A
5178156 Takishima et al. Jan 1993 A
5193539 Schulman et al. Mar 1993 A
5199428 Obel et al. Apr 1993 A
5215086 Terry, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5227165 Domb et al. Jul 1993 A
5234957 Mantelle Aug 1993 A
5255691 Otten Oct 1993 A
5259387 dePinto Nov 1993 A
5314458 Najafi May 1994 A
5318592 Schaldach Jun 1994 A
5330515 Rutecki et al. Jul 1994 A
5335657 Terry, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5344438 Testerman et al. Sep 1994 A
5360805 Ask et al. Nov 1994 A
5387587 Hausler et al. Feb 1995 A
5411546 Bowald et al. May 1995 A
5420151 Hammarberg et al. May 1995 A
5428006 Bechgaard et al. Jun 1995 A
5433739 Sluijter et al. Jul 1995 A
5458626 Krause Oct 1995 A
5458631 Xavier Oct 1995 A
5490520 Schaefer et al. Feb 1996 A
5514131 Edwards et al. May 1996 A
5540730 Terry, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5540734 Zabara Jul 1996 A
5545219 Kuzma Aug 1996 A
5558622 Greenberg Sep 1996 A
5569166 Stone Oct 1996 A
5578061 Stroetmann et al. Nov 1996 A
5591216 Testerman et al. Jan 1997 A
5640764 Strojnik Jun 1997 A
5645570 Corbucci Jul 1997 A
5653734 Alt Aug 1997 A
5658318 Stroetmann et al. Aug 1997 A
5660837 Lundquist Aug 1997 A
5676955 Ansmann et al. Oct 1997 A
5700282 Zabara Dec 1997 A
5707400 Terry, Jr. et al. Jan 1998 A
5711316 Elsberry et al. Jan 1998 A
5713922 King Feb 1998 A
5735817 Shantha Apr 1998 A
5756520 Ask et al. May 1998 A
5766605 Sanders et al. Jun 1998 A
5824027 Hoffer et al. Oct 1998 A
5843021 Edwards et al. Dec 1998 A
5861014 Familoni Jan 1999 A
5865843 Baudino Feb 1999 A
5938688 Schiff Aug 1999 A
6001088 Roberts et al. Dec 1999 A
6006134 Hill et al. Dec 1999 A
6016449 Fischell et al. Jan 2000 A
6026326 Bardy Feb 2000 A
6058331 King May 2000 A
6073048 Kieval et al. Jun 2000 A
6093145 Vom Berg et al. Jul 2000 A
6094598 Elsberry et al. Jul 2000 A
6104957 Alo et al. Aug 2000 A
6128538 Fischell et al. Oct 2000 A
6132384 Christopherson et al. Oct 2000 A
6134474 Fischell et al. Oct 2000 A
6141590 Renirie et al. Oct 2000 A
6146380 Racz et al. Nov 2000 A
6161044 Silverstone Dec 2000 A
6161048 Sluijter et al. Dec 2000 A
6178349 Kieval Jan 2001 B1
6205359 Boveja Mar 2001 B1
6246912 Sluijter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251126 Ottenhoff et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259952 Sluijter et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262377 Nielsen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269270 Boveja Jul 2001 B1
6292695 Webster, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308105 Duysens et al. Oct 2001 B1
6353792 Murthy Mar 2002 B1
6356786 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356787 Rezai et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356788 Boveja Mar 2002 B2
6366814 Boveja et al. Apr 2002 B1
6400982 Sweeney et al. Jun 2002 B2
6405079 Ansarinia Jun 2002 B1
6432986 Levin Aug 2002 B2
6438423 Rezai et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456786 Uchida et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458157 Suaning Oct 2002 B1
6491940 Levin Dec 2002 B1
6511500 Rahme Jan 2003 B1
6526318 Ansarinia Feb 2003 B1
6564096 Mest May 2003 B2
6564102 Boveja May 2003 B1
6610713 Tracey Aug 2003 B2
6615081 Boveja Sep 2003 B1
6633779 Schuler Oct 2003 B1
6647296 Fischell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6665562 Gluckman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6668191 Boveja Dec 2003 B1
6735475 Whitehurst et al. May 2004 B1
6760626 Boveja Jul 2004 B1
6788975 Whitehurst et al. Sep 2004 B1
RE38654 Hill et al. Nov 2004 E
6819956 DiLorenzo Nov 2004 B2
6853858 Shalev Feb 2005 B2
6885888 Rezai Apr 2005 B2
6978180 Tadlock Dec 2005 B2
7003352 Whitehurst Feb 2006 B1
7027860 Bruninga et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047078 Boggs, II et al. May 2006 B2
7076307 Boveja et al. Jul 2006 B2
7113033 Barnett Sep 2006 B2
7117033 Shalev et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120489 Shalev et al. Oct 2006 B2
7149574 Yun et al. Dec 2006 B2
7167751 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2007 B1
7191012 Boveja et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203548 Whitehurst et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209787 DiLorenzo Apr 2007 B2
7277758 DiLorenzo Oct 2007 B2
7285118 Lozano Oct 2007 B1
7286879 Wallace Oct 2007 B2
7292890 Whitehurst et al. Nov 2007 B2
7340298 Barbut Mar 2008 B1
7349743 Tadlock Mar 2008 B2
7363076 Yun et al. Apr 2008 B2
7369897 Boveja et al. May 2008 B2
7403821 Haugland et al. Jul 2008 B2
7477945 Rezai et al. Jan 2009 B2
7494458 Fischell et al. Feb 2009 B2
7532938 Machado et al. May 2009 B2
7561919 Shalev et al. Jul 2009 B2
7623924 Narciso, Jr. Nov 2009 B2
7640057 Libbus et al. Dec 2009 B2
7689276 Dobak Mar 2010 B2
7763034 Siegel et al. Jul 2010 B2
7848816 Wenzel et al. Dec 2010 B1
20020026222 Schauerte et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020073334 Sherman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020107553 Hill et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020169365 Nakada et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030004549 Hill et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018367 DiLorenzo Jan 2003 A1
20030018368 Ansarinia Jan 2003 A1
20030060857 Perrson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065374 Honeck Apr 2003 A1
20030100924 Foreman et al. May 2003 A1
20030133877 Levin Jul 2003 A1
20030144709 Zabara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030181951 Cates Sep 2003 A1
20030181958 Dobak, III Sep 2003 A1
20030181959 Dobak, III Sep 2003 A1
20030212440 Boveja Nov 2003 A1
20030216792 Levin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040015204 Whitehurst et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019364 Kieval et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040049235 Deno et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040172084 Knudson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040210295 Brushey Oct 2004 A1
20040230255 Dobak, III Nov 2004 A1
20040236381 Dinsmoor et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050065562 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050065573 Rezai Mar 2005 A1
20050075701 Shafer Apr 2005 A1
20050075702 Shafer Apr 2005 A1
20050102006 Whitehurst et al. May 2005 A1
20050143787 Boveja et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149156 Libbus et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154419 Whitehurst et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154426 Boveja et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050159790 Shalev Jul 2005 A1
20050197675 David et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209654 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216070 Boveja et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234523 Levin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050281751 Levin Dec 2005 A1
20060004423 Boveja et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020299 Shalev Jan 2006 A1
20060064140 Whitehurst et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074450 Boveja et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074463 Seeberger et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079945 Libbus Apr 2006 A1
20060085046 Rezai et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095088 De Ridder May 2006 A1
20060100667 Machado et al. May 2006 A1
20060100671 De Ridder May 2006 A1
20060111754 Rezai May 2006 A1
20060116721 Yun et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149337 John Jul 2006 A1
20060167497 Armstrong et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173495 Armstrong et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060184211 Gaunt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195169 Gross Aug 2006 A1
20060206165 Jaax et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235484 Jaax et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060293723 Whitehurst et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070021801 Heruth et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021802 Heruth et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027483 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027484 Guzman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027486 Armstrong Feb 2007 A1
20070027498 Maschino et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070039625 Heruth et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070049988 Carbunaru et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066997 He et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067004 Boveja et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083245 Lamensdorf et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100411 Bonde May 2007 A1
20070106143 Flaherty May 2007 A1
20070112404 Mann et al. May 2007 A1
20070156177 Harel et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156179 Karashurov Jul 2007 A1
20070167984 Kieval et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070203521 Dobak et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070233193 Craig Oct 2007 A1
20070250145 Kraus et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255368 Bonde et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255369 Bonde et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070293906 Cowan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080027346 Litt et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033509 Shalev et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046053 Wagner et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080071318 Brooke et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080086182 Ben-David et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103547 Okun et al. May 2008 A1
20080103569 Gerber May 2008 A1
20080132933 Gerber Jun 2008 A1
20080132981 Gerber Jun 2008 A1
20080132982 Gerber Jun 2008 A1
20080140000 Shuros et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161877 Kirby et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161894 Ben-David et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183237 Errico et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183246 Patel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183253 Bly Jul 2008 A1
20080262566 Jaax Oct 2008 A1
20080269716 Bonde et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012577 Rezai et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036949 Kokones et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090105783 Solberg et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118780 DiLorenzo May 2009 A1
20090216287 Ansarinia Aug 2009 A1
20090254147 Ansarinia Oct 2009 A1
20090264956 Rise et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276005 Pless Nov 2009 A1
20090276025 Burnes et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090312817 Hogle et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100185258 Papay Jul 2010 A1
20100268306 Maniak et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110029037 Rezai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20120209286 Papay et al. Aug 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
69427 Jan 1983 EP
0970813 Jan 2000 EP
754060 Mar 2003 EP
2108817 Apr 1996 RU
WO8500599 Feb 1985 WO
WO9207605 May 1992 WO
WO9521821 Aug 1995 WO
WO9702000 Jan 1997 WO
WO9715548 May 1997 WO
WO9723467 Jul 1997 WO
WO9738675 Oct 1997 WO
WO0185094 Nov 2001 WO
WO0197905 Dec 2001 WO
WO03082123 Oct 2003 WO
WO2005105202 Nov 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (113)
Entry
Gromova et al.; Sinusoidal modulated currents in comprehensive treatment of children with bronchial asthma; Voprosy Kurortologii Fizioterapii, I Lechebnoi Fizicheskoi Kultury; May-Jun.; (3); pp. 45-47; 1981 (w/ English Abstract).
Karashurov et al.; Radio frequency electrostimulation of the gangliated cord of the sympathetic nerve in patients with bronchial asthma; Surgery (Khigurgiia); vol. 1; pp. 44-46; 2000 (w/ English Abstract).
Rao et al., “Effectiveness of temporal pattern in the input to a ganglion: Inhibition in the cardiac ganglion of spiny lobsters”, J of Neurobiology, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 233-245 (1969) (abstract).
Sinkj et al., “Electroneurography”, Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation, Second Edition: pp. 109-132 (2006).
Boling et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,712 entitled “Implantable Neurostimulator with Integral Hermetic Electronic Enclosure, Circuit Substrate, Monolithic Feed-Through, Lead Assembly and Anchoring Mechanism,” filed Apr. 22, 2010.
Wingeier et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/791,690 entitled “Methods and Devices for Adrenal Stimulation,” filed Jun. 1, 2010.
Cooke-Ariel; Circadian variations in cardiovascular function and their relation to the occurrence and timing of cardiac events; Am. J. Heath. Syst. Pharm.; vol. 55; supp. 3; pp. S5-S11; Nov. 15, 1998.
Giles; Importance of long-acting andiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for congestive heart failure; Am. J. Cardiol.; vol. 70; pp. 98C-101C; Oct. 8, 1992.
Grossmann; Effects of cardiac glycosides on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in healthy volunteers and patients with heart failure; Eur J Clin Invest; vol. 31; Iss.S2; pp. 26-30; Apr. 2001.
Gudovsky et al.; Surgical treatment of bronchial asthma; Surgery (Khigurgiia); vol. 7; pp. 14-18; Jul. 2002.
Karashurov et al.; Evolution of surgical treatment of bronchial asthma; Surgery (Khigurgiia); vol. 11; pp. 57-60; Nov. 1999.
Kim et al.; Sympathectomy: Open and Thoracoscopic; In: Surgical Management of Pain; Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; RD 595.5.587; Chapter 55; Jan. 2002.
Mansoor et al.; Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: technique and application in the study of cardiac dysfunction and congestive heart failure; Congest Heart Fail; vol. 7; pp. 319-324; Nov./Dec. 2001.
Panina et al.; Assessment of autonomic tone over a 24-hour period in patients with congestive heart failure: relation between mean heart rate and measures of heart rate variability; Am. H. J.; vol. 129; pp. 748-753; Apr. 1995.
Teerlink et al.; Hemodynamic variability and circadian rhythm in rats with heart failure: role of locomotor activity; Am. J. Physiol.; vol. 264; pp. H2111-H2118; Jun. 1993.
Van Horne et al.; Multichannel semiconductor-based electrodes for in vivo electrochemical and electrophysiological studies in rat CNS; Neuroscience Letters; vol. 120; pp. 249-252; Nov. 1990.
Ardell et al.; “Differential sympathetic regulation of automatic, conductile, and contractile tissue in dog heart;” American Physiological Society; pp. H1050-H1059; Jun. 6, 1988.
Babe, “Treatment of sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia”, An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am, vol. 16(5): 463-74 (1989) (abstract).
Barre, “Cocaine as an abortive agent in cluster headache”, Headache, vol. 22: 69-73 (1982).
Benumof et al.; Pulmonary artery catheterization; In Clinical Procedures in Anesthesia and Intensive Care; JB Lippincott Company; pp. 405-441; 1992.
Berger et al., “Does topical anesthesia of the sphenopalatine ganglion with cocaine or lidocaine relieve low back pain?”, Anesth Analg, vol. 35: 87-108 (1925).
Brooksby et al.; Dynamic changes in splanchnic blood flow and blood volume in dogs during activation of sympathetic nerves; Circulation Research; vol. 29; pp. 227-238; 1971.
Brooksby et al; Release of blood from the splanchnic circulation in dogs; Circulation Research; vol. 31; pp. 105-118; 1972.
Browne et al., “Concurrent cervical and craniofacial pain” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 86(6): 633-640 (Dec. 1998).
Carneiro et al.; Blood reservoir function of dog spleen, liver and intestine; American Journal of Physiology; vol. 232; No. 1; pp. H67-H72; 1977.
Carroll et al., “Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: a preliminary study of 10 cases” Pain 84:431-437 (2000).
Cepero et al., “Long-term results of sphenopalatine ganglioneurectomy for facial pain”, Am J Otolaryngol, 8(3): 171-4 (1987).
Cheatham et al.; Shock: An overview, surgical critical care service; Department of Surgical Education; Orlando Regional Medical Center; 5th ed.; pp. 1-40; 2003.
Cook, “Cryosurgery of headache”, Res Clin Stud Headache, vol. 5: 86-101 (1978) (abstract).
Cooper et al.; Neural effects on sinus rate and atrioventricular conduction produced by electrical stimulation from a transvenous electrode catheter in the canine right pulmonary artery; Circulation Research; vol. 46; pp. 48-57; 1980.
Cutrer et al., “Effects of PNU-109,291, a selective 5H-T1D receptor agonist, on electrically induced dural plasma extravasation and capsaicin-evoked c-fos immunoreactivity within trigeminal nucleus caudalis” Neuropharm 38:1043-1053 (1999).
Delepine et al., “Plasma protein extravasation induced in the rat dura mater by stimulation of the parasympathetic sphenopalatine ganglion”, Exp Neurology, vol. 147: 389-400 (1997).
Devoghel, “Cluster headache and sphenopalatine block”, Acta Anaesthesio Belg, vol. 32(1), pp. 101-107 (1981).
Feindel et al., “The tentorial nerves and localization of intracranial pain in man” Neurology 555-563 (1955).
Ferrante et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders”, Reg Anesth Pain, vol. 23(1): 30-6 (1998) (abstract).
Frisardi et al., “Electric versus magnetic transcranial stimulation of the trigeminal system in healthy subjects. Clinical applications in gnathology.”, J Oral Rehabil, 24(12): 920-8 (1986) (abstract).
Goadsby et al., “Differential effects of low dose CP122,288 and eletriptan on Fos expression due to stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in cat” Pain 82:15-22 (1999).
Goadsby et al., “Stimulation of an intracranial trigeminally-innervated structure selectively increases cerebrial blood flow” Brain Research 751:247-252 (1997).
Goadsby et al., “Substance P blockade with the potent and centrally acting antagonist GR205171 does not effect central trigeminal activity with superior sagittal sinus stimuation” Neuroscience 86(1):337-343 (1998).
Goadsby et al., “The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats” Ann Neurol 33:48-56 (1993).
Goadsby et al., Effect of stimulation of trigeminal ganglion on regional cerebral blood flow in cats; Am J. Physiol.; vol. 22; pp. R270-R274; 1987.
Goadsby, “Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation increases regional blood flow independent of glucose utilization in the cat”, Brain Research, vol. 506: 145-8 (1990).
Gregoire, “Cluster headaches”, Can Nurse, vol. 87(9): 33-5 (1991) (abstract).
Hardebo, Jan-Erik; Activation of pain fibers to the internal carotid artery intracranially may cause the pain and local signs of reduced sympathetic and enhanced parasympathetic activity in cluster headache; Headache; 31; pp. 314-320; May 1991.
Hardebo, Jan-Erik; On pain mechanisms in cluster headache; Headache; 31; pp. 91-106; 1991.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, “Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain”, Cephalalgia, Supp & 0:13, 19-24 and 35-38 (1988).
Heusch et al.; Adrenergic mechanisms in myocardial ischemia; Supp. to Basic Research in Cardiology; vol. 85; 1990.
Hillier; Monitored anesthesia care; Clinical Anesthesia; Ch. 47; pp. 1239-1254; 2001.
Hoskin et al., “Fos expression in the trigeminocervical complex of the cat after stimulation of superior sagittal sinus is reduced by L-NAME” Neuroscience Letters 266:173-176 (1999).
Hudson; Basic principles of clinical pharmacology; Clinical Anesthesia; Ch. 11; pp. 239-260; 2001.
Ibarra, Eduardo; Neuromodulación del Ganglio Esfenopalation para Aliviar los Síntomas del la Cefalea en Raciomos; Boletin El Dolor; vol. 46, No. 16; pp. 12-18; 2007 (with English translation).
Janes et al.; Anatomy of human extrinsic cardiac nerves and ganglia; American Journal of Cardiology; vol. 57; pp. 299-309; 1986.
Janzen et al., “Sphenopalatine blocks in the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndrome”, Laryngoscope, vol. 107(10): 1420-2 (1997).
Kittrelle et al., “Cluster headache. Local anesthetic abortive agents”, Arch Neurol, vol. 42(5): 496-8 (May 1985).
Kudrow et al., “Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: preliminary findings”, Headache, vol. 25: 79-82 (1995).
Kudrow, “Natural history of cluster headaches—part 1 outcome of drop-out patients”, Headache, vol. 22: 203-6 (1982).
Kushiku et al.; Upregulation of Immunoreactive Angiotensin II Release and Angiotensinogen mRNA Expression by High-Frequency Preganglionic Stimulation at the Canine Cardiac Sympathetic Ganglia; Circ Res.; 88; pp. 110-116; 2001.
Lambert et al.; Comparative effects of stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion and the superior sagittal sinus on cerebral blood flow and evoked potentials in the cat; Brain Research; vol. 453; pp. 143-149; 1988.
Lebovits et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block: clinical use in the pain management clinic”, Clin J Pain, vol. 6(2): 131-6 (1990).
Maizels et al., “Intranasal lidocaine for treatment of migraine”, JAMA, vol. 276(4): 319-21 (1996).
Manahan et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block relieves symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia: a case report”, Nebr Med J, vol. 81(9): 306-9 (1996) (abstract).
Matsumoto et al.; Effective sites by sympathetic beta-andrenergic and vagal nonadrenergic inhibitory stimulation in constricted airways; Am Rev Respir Dis; vol. 132; pp. 1113-1117; Nov. 1985.
Matthey et al.; Bedside catheterization of the pulmonary artery: risks compared with benefits; In Clinical Procedures in Anesthesia and Intensive Care; JB Lippincott Company; vol. 109; pp. 826-834; 1988.
Meyer et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglionectomy for cluster headache”, Arch Otolaryngol, vol. 92(5): 475-84 (Nov. 1970).
Meyerson et al.; Alleviation of Atypical trigeminal pain by stimulation of the gasserian ganglion via an implanted electrode; Acta Neurochirurgica; supp. 30; pp. 303-309; 1980.
Moskowitz et al., “Basic mechanisms in vascular headache” Headache 8(4):801-815 (Nov. 1990).
Moskowitz, Michael; Cluster headache: evidence for a pathophysiologic focus in the superior pericarotid cavernous sinus plexus; Headache; vol. 28; pp. 584-586; 1988.
Murphy et al.; Human cardiac nerve stimulation; The Annals of Thoracic Surgery; vol. 54; p. 502; 1992.
Nguyen et al., “Chronic motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of central and neuropathic pain. Correlations between clinical, electrophysiological and anatomical data” Pain 82:245-251 (1999).
Onofrio et al., “Surgical treatment of chronic cluster headache”, Mayo Clin Proc, vol. 61(7), pp. 537-544 (1986).
Peterson et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block: a safe and easy method for the management of orofacial pain”, Cranio, vol. 13(3): 177-81 (1995) (abstract).
Phebus et al., “The non-peptide Nk-1 receptor antagonist LY303870 inhibits neurogenic dural inflammation in guinea pigs” Life Sciences 60(18):1553-1561 (1997).
Pollock et al., “Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of sphenopalatine neuralgia”, J Neurosurg, vol. 87(3): 450-3 (1997).
Reder et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion block in treatment of acute and chronic pain”, Diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain, John Wright, publisher, 97-108 (1982).
Reuter et al.; Experimental models of migraine; Funct Neurol; suppl. 15; pp. 9-18; 2000.
Ruskin, “Contributions to the study of the sphenopalatine ganglion”, Laryngoscope, vol. 35(2): 87-108 (1925).
Ruskin; Sphenopalatine (nasal) gaglion: remote effects including “psychosomatic” symptons, rage reaction, pain, and spasm; Arch Phys Med Rehabil; vol. 60; pp. 353-359; Aug. 1979.
Ryan et al., “Sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia and cluster headache: comparisons, contrasts, and treatment”, Headache, vol. 17: 7-8 (1977).
Saade et al., “Patient-administered sphenopalatine ganglion block”, Reg Anesth, vol. 21(1): 68-70 (1996) (abstract).
Sanders et al., “Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in 66 patients suffering from cluster headache: a 12- to 70- month follow-up evaluation”, J Neurosurg., vol. 87(6), pp. 876-880 (Dec. 1997).
Scherlag et al.; Endovascular stimulation within the left pulmonary artery to induce slowing of heart rate and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Cardiovascular Research; vol. 54; pp. 470-475; 2002.
Schulz et al., “Localization of epileptic auras induced on stimulation by subdural electrodes” Epilepsia 38(12) 1321-1329 (1997).
Seylaz et al., “Effect of stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion on cortical blood flow in the rat”, J Cerebr Blood Flow and Metab, vol. 8: 875-8 (1988).
Shuster et al., “Treatment of vasomotor rhinitis, trigeminal neuralgia and Sluder's syndrome by irradiation of the sphenopalatine ganglion with helium-neon lasers”, Vestin Otorinolaringol, vol. 4: 35-40 (1988).
Sluder, “The syndrome of sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia”, Am J Medicament Sci, vol. 111: 868-878 (1910).
Sluder; The anatomical and clinical relations of the sphenopalatine (Meckel's) ganglion to the nose and its accessory sinuses; NY Med. J.; vol. 90; pp. 293-298; Aug. 1909.
Steude; Percutaneous electro stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in patients with atypical trigeminal neuralgia; Neurochirurgia; vol. 21; pp. 66-69; 1978.
Storer et al., “Microiontophoretic application of serotonin (5HT) 1B/1D agonists inhibits trigeminal cell firing in the cat” Brain 120:2171-2177 (1997).
Strassman et al., “Sensitization of meningeal sensory neurons and the origin of headaches” Nature 384:560-563 (Dec. 1996).
Suzuki et al., “Selective electrical stimulation of postganglionic cerebrovascular parasympathetic nerve fibers originating from the sphenopalatine ganglion enhances cortical blood flow in the rat”, J Cerebr Blood Flow and Metab, vol. 10: 383-391 (1990).
Suzuki et al.; Trigeminal fibre collaterals storing substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide ; Neuroscience; vol. 30; No. 3; pp. 595-604; 1989.
Taub et al., “Chronic electrical stimulation of the gasserian ganglion for the relief of pain in a series of 34 patients”, J Neurosurg, vol. 86: 197-202 (1997).
Walters et al.; Cerebrovascular projections from the sphenopalatine and otic ganglia to the middle cerebral artery of the cat; Stroke; vol. 17; pp. 488-494; 1986.
Young, “Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve root for the treatment of chronic facial pain”, J Neurosurg, vol. 83: 72-78 (1995).
Witte et al.; Experimental heart failure in rats: effects on cardiovascular circadian rhythms and on myocardial ?-adrenergic signaling; Cardiovasc Res; vol. 47; pp. 350-358; 2000.
Yee et al.; Circadian variation in the effects of aldosterone blockade on heart rate variability and QT dispersion in congestive heart failure; J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.; vol. 37; pp. 1800-1807; 2001.
Levin, Bruce; U.S. Appl. No. 12/683,301 entitled “Method for Directed Intranasal Administration of a Composition,” filed Jan. 6, 2010.
Fletcher et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/688,524 entitled “Approval Per Use Implanted Neurostimulator,” filed Jan. 15, 2010.
Wingeier et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,444 entitled “Method and Devices for Adrenal Stimulation,” filed Jan. 22, 2010.
Moskowitz; Neurogenic inflammation in the pathophysiology and treatment of migraine; Neurology; vol. 43; suppl. 3; pp. S16-S20; 1993.
Alstadhaug, K.B.; Migraine and the hypothalamus; Cephalalgia (Blackwell Publishing Ltd.); pp. 1-9; 2009.
Boysen et al.; Parasympathetic tonic dilatory influences on cerebral vessels; Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical; vol. 147; pp. 101-104; 2009.
Cohen et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion block for postdural puncture headache; Anaesthesia; vol. 64; pp. 574-575; 2009.
Iliff et al.; Epoxyeicosanoids as mediators of neurogenic vasodilation in cerebral vessels; Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; vol. 296; pp. 1352-1363; Mar. 20, 2009.
Kosaras et al.; Sensory innervation of the calvarial bones of the mouse; The Journal of Comparative Neurology (John Wiley & Sons); 48 pgs.; 2009.
Narouze et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache; Headache; vol. 49; pp. 571-577; Apr. 2009.
Narouze et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the acute treatment of intractable migraine; American Academy of Pain Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts; pp. 226 (Abstract No. 157); 2009.
Scott et al.; Trigger point injections for chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review; Pain Medicine; vol. 10; No. 1; pp. 54-69; 2009.
Toda et al.; Cerebral blood flow regulation by nitric oxide: recent advances; Pharmacol Rev; vol. 61; No. 1; pp. 62-97; 2009.
Vitek; Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: excitation or inhibition; Movement Disorders; vol. 17; supp. 3; pp. S69-S72; 2002.
Zarembinski et al.; Sphenopalatine ganglion block in traumatic trigeminal neuralgia and the outcome to radiosurgical ablation; American Academy of Pain Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts; pp. 200 (abstract No. 102); 2009.
Guo et al.; Treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia with acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion; Journal of traditional chinese medicine; vol. 15(1) pp. 31-33; 1995.
Karavis, “The neurophysiology of acupuncture: a viewpoint”, Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 15(1): 33-42 (May 1997).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100168513 A1 Jul 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61141179 Dec 2008 US