A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The following notice applies to the software and data as described below, and in the drawings, that form a part of this document: Copyright Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company d/b/a Marvin Windows and Doors, Warroad, MN. All Rights Reserved.
This document pertains generally, but not by way of limitation, to status monitoring of fenestration assemblies including windows and doors.
Fenestration assemblies including door assemblies, window assemblies, and the like have one or more movable panels such as sashes or doors. The panels are movable relative to respective window and door frames. Security features are provided to fenestration assemblies to facilitate closing and locking of the assemblies to accordingly secure a home, building or the like.
Confirmation of closing and locking of a fenestration assembly is accomplished in some examples with a plurality of sensors. Each sensor is configured to detect a status of the fenestration assembly. For instance, in one example, a sensor is provided to detect whether the door or sash of the fenestration assembly is closed. Another sensor (second sensor) is provided to detect if the door or sash is locked. The status of each sensor including detection of a closed condition by the first sensor and a locked condition by the second sensor is, for example, provided to a user remotely to indicate both status conditions of the assembly. That is to say open/closed and locked/unlocked status indicators for the fenestration assembly are provided to a user.
In another example, the output of the sensors including open/closed conditions from a first sensor and locked/unlocked conditions from a second sensor are interpreted by a controller (e.g., processor, memory, program or the like) to determine if the fenestration assembly is secure or unsecure. The controller provides a secure status if both the closed and locked conditions occur at the same time. However, if the first sensor detects the open condition and the second sensor detects either of the locked or unlocked conditions, the controller provides an unsecure status. Similarly, if the second sensor detects the unlocked condition and the first sensor detects either of the open or closed conditions the controller provides an unsecure status. Stated another way, the controller is provided with an algorithm that in effect provides a flow chart to determine the secure or unsecure status of the fenestration assembly based.
Overview
The present inventors have recognized, among other things, that a problem to be solved includes reducing the number of sensors and supporting components needed to determine if a fenestration assembly is secure (closed and locked) or unsecure. In some examples, status monitoring systems use a plurality of sensors. Each of the sensors is configured to detect a separate condition of the assembly. For instance, a first sensor detects the locked/unlocked condition and a second sensor detects the closed/open condition. Spacing for the sensors is provided in or on the fenestration assembly. Where the sensors are provided in the fenestration assembly routing, molding or the like is used to provide sufficient space for the sensors. Where the sensors are provided on the fenestration assembly the aesthetic appeal of the assembly is decreased because of the visible installed sensors. Further, where a controller is used to interpret the conditions from the various sensors and output one or more status indicators for the fenestration assembly, additional space is allocated within the fenestration assembly for the controller, or optionally, the controller is fastened to the exterior of the fenestration assembly (thereby further decreasing the aesthetic appeal). Further still, the controller provides additional expense and labor for the status monitoring assembly because of additional electronics, coding (for algorithms) or the like.
The present subject matter provides a solution to this problem, such as by providing a status monitoring assembly including a sensor (e.g., sensor, switch or the like) configured to provide a secure status indicator with the fenestration assembly closed and locked. In one example a sensor and a sensor operator (e.g., a sensor assembly) are installed with the fenestration assembly. The sensor is configured to detect the sensor operator when the fenestration assembly is closed (e.g., the door, sash, or sashes are closed) and the locking mechanism is locked (e.g., a latch is coupled with a latch fastener). When both of these conditions are satisfied the sensor operator is detected by the sensor and a secure status for the assembly is achieved. In other permutations or conditions, where one or more of the panel is open or the locking mechanism is unlocked, the sensor fails to detect the sensor operator and accordingly the status monitoring assembly provides an unsecure status (including a failure to indicate the system is secure). Relatively complex logic (i.e., flowchart type algorithms) and associated controllers that assess multiple conditions from multiple sensors and output a status based on the assessment are thereby avoided.
The status monitoring assembly described in the examples herein thereby determines the secure and unsecure status through a consolidated system including one or more sensors (as opposed to requiring at least two sensors). Further, the status monitoring assembly performs this function without the use of a controller, algorithms, subscription to a service that broadcasts (and optionally interprets) status data from the fenestration assembly or the like. Instead, the secure or unsecure status of the status monitoring assembly is in one example readily broadcast with a wireless transceiver (including a transmitter) and received at an output device at the home or with the user (e.g., a smartphone, tablet or the like).
Because the status monitoring assemblies described herein use a sensor and sensor operator and do not require multiple sensors, the integration of the assemblies with fenestration components (e.g., frames, doors, sashes or the like) is facilitated relative to the multiple components of other status monitoring systems having plural sensors, a controller and the like. Accordingly, routing of recesses and routing of interconnections for power and transmission (where included) are thereby reduced, and the status monitoring assemblies (including a sensor assembly, power source, transceiver or the like) are readily integrated with fenestration assemblies. Further, because of the minimal number of components, the status monitoring assembly is readily concealed within fenestration assemblies to maintain the aesthetic appeal of the assembly.
This overview is intended to provide an overview of subject matter of the present patent application. It is not intended to provide an exclusive or exhaustive explanation of the invention. The detailed description is included to provide further information about the present patent application.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different instances of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
In the example shown in
Further, and in some examples, the fenestration assembly 100 includes one or more locking mechanisms. In the example shown in
The locking mechanism 150 optionally includes a locking operator 155 (e.g., a lever, slider, handle, or the like). In an example, the locking operator 155 is coupled with the first latch 151, and movement (e.g., translation or manipulation) of the locking operator 155 couples or decouples the first latch 151 with the first latch fastener 152 to lock or unlock the locking mechanism 150. For example, the locking operator 155 is rotatably coupled to a pivot point 250. Additionally, in this example, the locking operator 155 is coupled to a latch linkage 260. The locking operator 155 is configured to move (e.g., rotate about the pivot point 250) and the movement of the locking operator 155 is transferred to the first latch 151 by the latch linkage 260. In some examples, the first latch 151 is coupled to a tie bar 160, and translation of the locking operator 155 is optionally transferred to the tie bar 160 by the latch linkage 260 and the first latch 151. In still other examples, the locking operator 155 is directly coupled with the tie bar 160, for instance with a pin and groove assembly, and the tie bar 160 is coupled with the first latch 151 (and in some examples additional latches elsewhere on the fenestration assembly).
Referring again to
As shown in
The tie bar 160 optionally includes a tie bar arm 165. The tie bar arm 165 projects away from at least one of the one or more locking mechanisms 150, for instance the second locking mechanism 150B. In an example, the tie bar arm 165 projects from the second locking mechanism 150B, and the tie bar arm 165 is positioned proximate a corner of the fenestration frame 110. In another example, the tie bar arm 165 translates (e.g., reciprocates) with respect to the locking mechanism 150 when the tie bar 160 translates (e.g., if the locking operator 155 is moved by a user).
The fenestration assembly 100 optionally includes a retaining bracket 170. The retaining bracket 170 defines a channel, and the channel is sized and shaped to receive the tie bar 160. The retaining bracket 170 is coupled with the fenestration frame 110, and accordingly couples the tie bar 160 with the fenestration frame 110. The tie bar 160 is slidably coupled with the retaining bracket 160 (e.g., the channel), and the tie bar 160 is configured to translate with respect to the fenestration frame 110. In an example, the tie bar arm 165 translates (e.g., reciprocates) with respect to the retaining bracket 170 and the position of the tie bar arm 165 (e.g., an end portion of the tie bar arm 165) varies with respect to the retaining bracket 170 (or the fenestration frame 110, for instance a corner of the fenestration frame 110).
As shown in
The sensor 182 (e.g., a magnetic sensor, a mechanical switch, an electrical switch, or the like) detects the presence of the sensor operator 184 (e.g., a magnet, a mechanical contact, an electrical contact, or the like). In an example, the sensor 182 detects the sensor operator 184 positioned proximate the sensor operator 184. For example, the sensor 182 includes an electrical switch, and if the sensor operator 184 is positioned proximate the sensor 182 (e.g., the panel 120 is closed and locked), the electrical switch is closed and one or more of current or a change in resistance or potential are sensed. If the sensor operator 184 is remote from the sensor 182, the electrical switch is open and the sensor accordingly fails to detect the closed and locked panel 120.
The sensor 182 and the sensor operator 184 are coupled to the fenestration assembly 100 to facilitate the monitoring of the secure and unsecure configurations of the fenestration assembly 100. In an example, the sensor 182 detects the sensor operator 184 if the panel 120 is in the closed position. In another example, the sensor 182 detects the sensor operator 184 if a latch (e.g., the first latch 151) is coupled with a latch fastener (e.g., the first latch fastener 152). In still another example, the sensor 182 detects the sensor operator 184 because the fenestration assembly 100 is in the closed position and the latch is coupled with the latch fastener.
The status monitoring assembly 180 is optionally configured to report an indication (e.g., an LED is activated, a mechanical flag or indicia is triggered, an electrical or electromagnetic signal) of the secure configuration if the sensor operator 184 is detected by the sensor 182. Additionally, and in some examples, the status monitoring assembly 180 is configured to report an indication of the unsecure configuration if the sensor operator 184 is undetected by the sensor 182.
Referring again to
As described herein and shown in
As shown, in the first unsecure configuration the sensor operator 184 is remote relative to (e.g., not adjacent to, not close to, or positioned away from) the sensor 182. Because the panel 120 is in the open position, the sensor 182 fails to detect the sensor operator 184, and the status monitoring assembly 180 indicates the fenestration assembly 100 is in an unsecure configuration (including a failure to indicate a second configuration). In another example, the status monitoring assembly 180 reports (e.g., provides, transmits or the like) an indication of the unsecure configuration, such as a signal or failure to provide a signal (including no signal).
The tie bar 160 is coupled with the locking operator 155, and the tie bar 160 transmits motion (e.g., translation or movement) of the locking operator 155 to each of the one or more locking mechanisms 150 (e.g., the first locking mechanism 150A and the second locking mechanism 150B). In some examples, the tie bar arm 165 projects away from at least one of the locking mechanisms 150, and the sensor 182 (or the sensor operator 184) is coupled to the tie bar arm 166. Accordingly, the tie bar arm 165 positions the sensor 182 (or the sensor operator 184) remote relative to one or more of the locking mechanisms 150.
In some examples, the sensor 182 is repositionable relative to the fenestration frame 110 (and/or the sensor operator 184). As discussed herein, the tie bar 160 is configured to translate with respect to the fenestration frame 110 (or the retaining bracket 170). The tie bar arm 165 correspondingly translates with respect to the fenestration frame 110. The sensor 182 (or the sensor operator 184) is optionally coupled to the tie bar arm 165, and accordingly, the sensor 182 translates with respect to the fenestration frame 110 if the locking operator 155 is manipulated. The translation of the sensor 182 repositions the sensor 182 relative to the fenestration frame 110 or other components of the fenestration assembly 100 (e.g., the first latch fastener 152, the retaining bracket 170, or the sensor operator 184). For example, the sensor 182 is positioned proximate to the second latch fastener 158 if the locking mechanism 150 is in the unlocked configuration. Conversely, the sensor 182 is positioned remote to the second latch fastener 158 if the locking mechanism 150 is in the locked configuration.
In an example, if the locking mechanism 150 is in an unlocked configuration (e.g., the second unlocked configuration shown in
In an example, the locking operator 155 is moved (e.g., manipulated by a user) and the locking mechanism 150 is transitioned to the locked configuration. The tie bar 160 (and the tie bar arm 165) translates with respect to the fenestration frame 110 (e.g., away from the retaining bracket 170). The translation of the tie bar 160 positions the sensor operator 182 proximate relative to the sensor 182, and in the locked configuration, the sensor 182 detects the sensor operator 184. Accordingly, the sensor 182 fails to detect the sensor operator 184, and the status monitoring assembly 180 reports (e.g., provides) an indication (e.g., an electrical signal) indicating that the fenestration assembly 100 is in an unsecure configuration, including (but not limited to) the second unsecure configuration shown in
For example, the locking mechanism 150 is in the locking configuration, the first latch 151 is aligned with the first latch fastener 152, and the first latch 151 intercepts the first latch fastener 152 with movement (e.g., rotation) of the panel 120 toward the closed position. The first latch 151 prevents positioning of the panel 120 in the closed position. Accordingly, the sensor operator 184 is remote relative to the sensor 182 because the first latch 151 is intercepting the first latch fastener 152 and the status monitoring assembly 100 reports an unsecure configuration of the fenestration assembly 100, including (but not limited to) the third unsecure configuration shown in
In some examples, the mechanism and monitoring cover 400 defines a recess to allow the locking operator 155 to be moved (e.g., manipulated by a user) while the remaining components of the locking mechanism 150 are concealed by the mechanism and monitoring cover 400. Optionally, the mechanism and monitoring cover 400 matches the finish of the remainder of the fenestration assembly 100 (e.g., wood grain, paint, vinyl, another polymer, or the like).
At 502, at least one panel 120 is moved between an open position and a closed position relative to a fenestration frame 110 (see
At 506, the secure and unsecure configurations of the fenestration assembly 100 are monitored with a status monitoring assembly 180 including a sensor 182 and a sensor operator 184. The sensor 182 detects the sensor operator 184, and optionally transmits a signal (or no signal) to facilitate the reporting of the secure and unsecure configurations of the fenestration assembly 100.
At 508, monitoring the configuration of the fenestration assembly 100 includes failing to detect the sensor operator 184 with the sensor 182 if at least one of the panel 120 is in the open position or the latch (e.g., the first latch 151, shown in
At 510, monitoring the configuration of the fenestration assembly 100 includes detecting the sensor operator 184 with the sensor 182 if both the at least one panel 120 is in the closed position and the latch (e.g., the second latch 157, shown in
In yet another example, the sensor operator 184 is detected by moving the at least one panel 120 into the closed position. The sensor operator 184 is moved into proximity with the sensor 182 with movement of the at least one panel 200. Optionally, the sensor 182 is moved into proximity with the sensor operator 184 with movement of the at least one latch (e.g., the first latch 151). For instance, the sensor 182 is coupled with the tie bar 160, the tie bar 160 is configured to move the at least one latch, and the sensor 182 is moved with the tie bar 160 and the at least one latch.
At 512, a secure configuration notification is provided if the sensor operator 184 is detected by the sensor 182. For example, the module 200 is in communication with the sensor 182 (e.g., hard-wired or wirelessly), and the module 200 provides the secure notification to a user, including (but not limited to) an electronic device (e.g., a cellular phone, a tablet computer, a desktop computer, a home automation display, or the like).
Example 1 can include subject matter, such as a fenestration assembly configured for status monitoring, the fenestration assembly comprising: a fenestration frame; at least one panel rotatably coupled with the fenestration frame between open and closed positions; a locking mechanism coupled with the fenestration frame and the panel, the locking mechanism includes at least one latch and at least one latch fastener, one of the latch or latch fastener is coupled with the fenestration frame and the other of the latch fastener or latch is coupled with the panel; wherein the fenestration assembly includes secure and unsecure configurations, in the secure configuration the panel is in the closed position and the latch is coupled with the latch fastener, and in the unsecure configuration one or more of the panel is in the open position or the latch is decoupled from the latch fastener; and a status monitoring assembly configured to monitor secure and unsecure configurations of the fenestration assembly, the status monitoring assembly includes: a sensor operator coupled with one of the fenestration frame or the panel, and a sensor coupled with the other of the panel or the fenestration frame, and the sensor is configured to detect the sensor operator if the panel is in the closed position and the latch is coupled with the latch fastener.
Example 2 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Example 1, to optionally include wherein the status monitoring assembly is configured to report the secure configuration with the sensor operator detected by the sensor, and the status monitoring assembly is configured to report the unsecure configuration with the sensor operator undetected by the sensor.
Example 3 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of one or any combination of Examples 1 or 2 to optionally include wherein the latch includes a latch blade having a tapered portion and a locking portion, the tapered portion is configured to bias the latch fastener toward the locking portion. Example 4 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of one or any combination of Examples 1-3 to optionally include wherein the sensor is configured to detect the sensor operator only if the panel is in the closed position and the latch is coupled with the latch fastener.
Example 5 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of one or any combination of Examples 1˜4 to optionally include wherein the sensor operator is selected from the group consisting of a magnet, a mechanical contact or an electrical contact and the sensor is selected from the group consisting of a magnetic sensor, a mechanical switch or an electrical switch.
Example 6 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-5 to optionally include wherein the locking mechanism includes: an operator, a tie bar coupled between the operator and the latch, and wherein movement of the operator between locked and unlocked positions moves the tie bar and the latch between corresponding locked and unlocked positions.
Example 7 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-6 to optionally include wherein each of the operator, tie bar and the latch are coupled with the fenestration frame, and the latch fastener is coupled with the panel.
Example 8 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-7 to optionally include wherein the sensor is coupled with the tie bar, and the sensor operator is coupled with the panel.
Example 9 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-8 to optionally include wherein the sensor is remote relative to the latch fastener with the latch in a locked position, and the sensor is more proximate to the latch fastener in an unlocked position than in the locked position. Example 10 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-9 to optionally include wherein the sensor operator is remote relative to the latch fastener and the latch.
Example 11 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-10 to optionally include a fenestration assembly configured for status monitoring, the fenestration assembly comprising: a fenestration frame; at least one panel rotatably coupled with the fenestration frame between open and closed positions; a locking mechanism coupled with the fenestration frame and the panel, the locking mechanism includes: at least one latch fastener, at least one latch, an operator, a tie bar coupled between the operator and the latch, and wherein movement of the operator between locked and unlocked positions moves the tie bar and the latch between corresponding locked and unlocked positions; and a status monitoring assembly configured to monitor secure and unsecure configurations of the fenestration assembly, the status monitoring assembly includes: a sensor operator coupled with one of the fenestration frame or the panel, and a sensor coupled with the other of the panel or the fenestration frame, and the sensor is configured to detect the sensor operator if the sash is in the closed position and the latch is coupled with the latch fastener in the locked configuration.
Example 12 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-11 to optionally include wherein each of the operator, tie bar and the latch are coupled with the fenestration frame, and the latch fastener is coupled with the panel.
Example 13 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-12 to optionally include wherein the sensor is coupled with the tie bar, and the sensor operator is coupled with the panel.
Example 14 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-13 to optionally include wherein the sensor is remote relative to the latch fastener with the latch in the locked position, and the sensor is more proximate to the latch fastener in the unlocked position than in the locked position.
Example 15 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-14 to optionally include wherein the sensor operator is remote relative to the latch fastener and the latch.
Example 16 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-15 to optionally include wherein the at least one latch includes first and second latches, and the tie bar couples each of the first and second latches with the operator.
Example 17 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-16 to optionally include wherein the locking mechanism includes a blocking configuration, and in the blocking configuration with the panel in the open position and the latch in the locked position the latch is aligned with the latch fastener, the latch intercepts the latch fastener with movement of the panel toward the closed position and prevents positioning of the panel in the closed position, and the sensor operator is held remote from the sensor with the latch intercepting the latch fastener.
Example 18 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-17 to optionally include wherein the status monitoring assembly is configured to report a secure configuration with the sensor operator detected by the sensor, and the status monitoring assembly is configured to report an unsecure configuration with the sensor operator undetected by the sensor.
Example 19 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-18 to optionally include wherein the latch fastener includes a pin, and the latch includes a latch blade having a tapered portion and a locking portion, the tapered portion is configured to bias the pin toward the locking portion.
Example 20 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-19 to optionally include wherein the sensor is configured to detect the sensor operator only if the sash is in the closed position and the latch is in the locked position.
Example 21 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-20 to optionally include wherein the sensor operator includes one or more of a magnet, a mechanical contact or an electrical contact, and the sensor includes one or more of a magnetic sensor, a mechanical switch or an electrical switch.
Example 22 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-21 to optionally include a power source in electrical communication with the sensor, and the power source is concealed within one or more of the panel or the fenestration frame.
Example 23 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-22 to optionally include a transceiver in electrical communication with the sensor, and the transceiver is concealed within one or more of the panel or the fenestration frame.
Example 24 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-23 to optionally include a method for monitoring a status of a fenestration assembly comprising: moving at least one panel between an open position and a closed position relative to a fenestration frame; moving at least one latch between coupled and decoupled positions relative to a latch fastener; monitoring secure and unsecure configurations of the fenestration assembly with a status monitoring assembly including a sensor and a sensor operator, monitoring including: failing to detect the sensor operator with the sensor if at least one of the panel is in the open position or the latch is decoupled from the latch fastener, and detecting the sensor operator with the sensor if both the at least one panel is in the closed position and the latch is coupled with the latch fastener; and providing a secure configuration notification if the sensor operator is detected by the sensor.
Example 25 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-24 to optionally include wherein moving the at least one panel includes rotating the at least one panel relative to the fenestration frame. Example 26 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-25 to optionally include wherein moving the at least one latch between coupled and decoupled positions includes: moving an operator, transmitting movement from the operator to the at least one latch with a tie bar, and moving the at least one latch according to movement of the operator.
Example 27 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-26 to optionally include wherein detecting the sensor operator with the sensor includes moving the sensor into proximity with the sensor operator, the sensor is coupled with the tie bar and moves with the tie bar.
Example 28 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-27 to optionally include wherein detecting the sensor operator with the sensor includes: moving the at least one panel into the closed position and moving the sensor operator into proximity with the sensor with movement of the at least one panel, and moving the sensor into proximity with the sensor operator with movement of the at least one latch.
Example 29 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-28 to optionally include wherein moving the sensor into proximity with the sensor operator with movement of the least one latch includes moving the sensor with a tie bar configured to move the at least one latch, the sensor coupled with the tie bar.
Example 30 can include, or can optionally be combined with the subject matter of Examples 1-29 to optionally include wherein detecting the sensor operator with the sensor includes: moving the sensor into proximity with the sensor operator, and moving the sensor away from the latch fastener.
Each of these non-limiting examples can stand on its own, or can be combined in various permutations or combinations with one or more of the other examples.
The above description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” Such examples can include elements in addition to those shown or described. However, the present inventors also contemplate examples in which only those elements shown or described are provided. Moreover, the present inventors also contemplate examples using any combination or permutation of those elements shown or described (or one or more aspects thereof), either with respect to a particular example (or one or more aspects thereof), or with respect to other examples (or one or more aspects thereof) shown or described herein.
In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and any documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in this document controls.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In this document, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, composition, formulation, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
Geometric terms, such as “parallel”, “perpendicular”, “round”, or “square”, are not intended to require absolute mathematical precision, unless the context indicates otherwise. Instead, such geometric terms allow for variations due to manufacturing or equivalent functions. For example, if an element is described as “round” or “generally round,” a component that is not precisely circular (e.g., one that is slightly oblong or is a many-sided polygon) is still encompassed by this description.
Method examples described herein can be machine or computer-implemented at least in part. Some examples can include a computer-readable medium or machine-readable medium encoded with instructions operable to configure an electronic device to perform methods as described in the above examples. An implementation of such methods can include code, such as microcode, assembly language code, a higher-level language code, or the like. Such code can include computer readable instructions for performing various methods. The code may form portions of computer program products. Further, in an example, the code can be tangibly stored on one or more volatile, non-transitory, or non-volatile tangible computer-readable media, such as during execution or at other times. Examples of these tangible computer-readable media can include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. § 1.72(b), to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description as examples or embodiments, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment, and it is contemplated that such embodiments can be combined with each other in various combinations or permutations. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This patent application is a continuation of Fames et. al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/035,341 entitled “INTEGRATED FENESTRATION STATUS MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE SAME,” filed on Jul. 13, 2018 (Attorney Docket No. 1261.173US1), which claims the benefit of priority of Fames et. al., U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/532,208 entitled “INTEGRATED FENESTRATION STATUS MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE SAME,” filed on Jul. 13, 2017 (Attorney Docket No. 1261.173PRV), which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. This patent application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/430,322 entitled, “INTEGRATED FENESTRATION STATUS MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR THE SAME,” filed Feb. 10, 2017.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
398039 | Flatman et al. | Feb 1889 | A |
660438 | Holly et al. | Oct 1900 | A |
937348 | Wheelock | Oct 1909 | A |
1434371 | Crompton et al. | Nov 1922 | A |
2104134 | Ferdinand | Jan 1938 | A |
2274711 | Krause | Mar 1942 | A |
2545645 | Blakely | Mar 1951 | A |
2778326 | Guzik | Jan 1957 | A |
2883225 | Akehurst | Apr 1959 | A |
2967595 | Abe | Jan 1961 | A |
3525830 | Hawkins | Aug 1970 | A |
3641540 | Cutler et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4346372 | Sandberg | Aug 1982 | A |
4351288 | Gasloli | Sep 1982 | A |
4465997 | Hines | Aug 1984 | A |
4497135 | Vetter | Feb 1985 | A |
4624073 | Randall | Nov 1986 | A |
4639021 | Hope | Jan 1987 | A |
4656463 | Anders | Apr 1987 | A |
5004961 | Berner et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5006766 | Yuhas et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5090750 | Lindqvist | Feb 1992 | A |
5226256 | Fries et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5301989 | Dallmann et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311168 | Pease, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5355059 | McMillan | Oct 1994 | A |
5382060 | O'Toole et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398447 | Morse | Mar 1995 | A |
5437173 | Spinar | Aug 1995 | A |
5449987 | McMillan | Sep 1995 | A |
5592781 | Mauro | Jan 1997 | A |
5595075 | Chen | Jan 1997 | A |
5595409 | Fier et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5653485 | Campbell | Aug 1997 | A |
5712621 | Andersen | Jan 1998 | A |
5791700 | Biro | Aug 1998 | A |
5992907 | Sheldon et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6141913 | Wong et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6176041 | Roberts | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212923 | Clark | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6588150 | Wong et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615629 | Bates | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6669242 | Fountaine et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672009 | Wong et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6778086 | Morrone et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6817142 | Marshik et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6871885 | Goldenberg et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877784 | Kelley et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6938373 | Wong et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957513 | Pettit et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7013603 | Eenigenburg et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7042353 | Stilp | May 2006 | B2 |
7068162 | Maple et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070215 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079020 | Stilp | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7118142 | Xu | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7158029 | Martyn | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7165791 | Rebel et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7227463 | Merrell | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7322619 | Nolte et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7355515 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7407199 | Richardson | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412800 | Maier | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7481470 | Eenigenburg et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7591494 | Mitchell | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7607262 | Pettit et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7731251 | Ye | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7812800 | Peng et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7874598 | Chung | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7963577 | Wolf | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976077 | Flory et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8020904 | Flory et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8182001 | Tremble et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8205920 | Flory | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8269627 | Gore et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8624736 | Gore et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8955255 | DeBoer et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8978304 | Hollermann et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9157902 | Gore et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9562378 | DeBoer et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9657503 | Hollermann et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10138658 | Barton et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10228266 | McGruder | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10930124 | Fames et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11015368 | Deboer et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11365561 | Hollermann et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20020116874 | Marshik | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030084614 | Pettit et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110698 | Polowinczak et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110699 | Eenigenburg et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040003541 | Wong et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040168370 | Pettit et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195843 | Rotondi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260150 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050097823 | Marshik | May 2005 | A1 |
20050140150 | Hall et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060033343 | Xu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060225354 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244270 | Rotondi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070046036 | Kinsey | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070194914 | Gates | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209281 | Flory et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070262848 | Berstis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080000162 | Zayac | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080084299 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080129054 | Tremble et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163551 | Nolte et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211238 | Stevens | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246287 | Satram et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090241429 | Polowinczak et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100050528 | Pettit et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100207403 | Bourgoin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218425 | Nolte et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263415 | Ruspil | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110113695 | Derham | May 2011 | A1 |
20110192089 | Barton et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110296880 | Sieglaar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304163 | Liang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120313386 | Liang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313387 | Liang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130214545 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130283694 | Deboer et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283695 | Hollermann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285391 | Wolf et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140230331 | Kellum, III | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150167377 | Deboer et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150184434 | Hollermann et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150252596 | Liang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170234033 | Deboer et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180202198 | Hollermann et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190019382 | Farnes et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2333555 | Jul 1999 | GB |
WO-2006116675 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 9,523,223 B2, 12/2016, DeBoer et al. (withdrawn) |
US 10,975,597 B2, 04/2021, DeBoer et al. (withdrawn) |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,842, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 15, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,842, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,842, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 29, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,842, Response filed Mar. 6, 2014 to Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 6, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,842, Response filed Sep. 3, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2014”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,842, Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 6, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Amendment and Response filed Aug. 22, 2014 to Final Office Action dated May 23, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Non Final Office Action dated May 23, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 10, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Response filed Mar. 26, 2014 to Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 3, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Response filed Aug. 22, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated May 23, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/872,864, Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 3, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Applicant Interview Summary filed Apr. 12, 2016”, 1 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 5, 2017”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2015”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Notice of Allowance dated May 2, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 9, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 5, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Response filed Mar. 1, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Response filed Nov. 17, 2015 to Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 11, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Restriction Requirement mailed U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,174, Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 11, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Examiner Interview Summary dated Sep. 16, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2016”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 17, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Preliminary Amendment dated Mar. 18, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Response filed Mar. 21, 2016 to Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 21, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Response filed Sep. 12, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2016”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Response filed Dec. 19, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/658,834, Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 21, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 5, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 1, 2019”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 17, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2020”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2020”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 31, 2019”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 20, 2020”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Response filed May 29, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2020”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Response filed Nov. 11, 2020 to Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2020”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Response filed Jul. 5, 2019 to Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 17, 2021”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 23, 2021”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,322, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 11, 2020”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 15, 2021”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2021”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2020”, 34 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Response filed Mar. 24, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2020”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,341, Examiner Interview Summary dated Sep. 30, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,341, Final Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2020”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,341, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2019”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,341, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 21, 2020”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,341, Response filed Mar. 16, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2019”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,341, Response filed Oct. 9, 2020 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2020”, 12 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,001,471, Voluntary Amendment filed Nov. 3, 2020”, 9 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,011,471, Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“Definition of the word “cam””, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com>, (2021), 11 pgs. |
“Definition of the word “translate””, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com>, (2021), 14 pgs. |
“Definition of the word “translation””, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.merriarn-webster.com>, (2021), 13 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11154029.0, European Search Report and Opinion dated Sep. 25, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“Kolbe & Kolbe Windows & Doors”, [online] [retrieved Apr. 23, 2012], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.kolbe-kolbe.com/>, 1 pg. |
Sopkowiak, J., “Sash Limited Apparatus and Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/328,776, filed Dec. 16, 2011, 67 pgs. |
Sopkowiak, J., “Sash Limiter Apparatus and Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/486,813, filed May 17, 2011, 63 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 20, 2022”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 20, 2022”, 10 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/873,707, Response filed Sep. 29, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2021”, 17 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,957,874, Examiner's Rule 86(2) Requisition dated Sep. 29, 2022”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,957,874, Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2021”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,957,874, Response filed Apr. 14, 2022 to Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2021”, 115 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,95/,874, Response Filed Oct. 4, 2022 to Examiner's Rule 86(2) Requisition dated Sep. 29, 2022”, 11 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,992,217, Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2021”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,992,217, Response Filed Apr. 6, 2022 to Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2021”, 14 pgs. |
“Definition for “transverse,””, <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transverse>, (2022), 12 pages. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,957,874, Examiners Rule 86(2) Report dated Aug. 25, 2023”, 3 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210304572 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62532208 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16035341 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 17167815 | US |