Integrated fibre channel support in an ethernet fabric switch

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9699117
  • Patent Number
    9,699,117
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 5, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 4, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
One embodiment of the present invention provides a switch. The switch includes a packet processor and a device management module. During operation, the packet processor constructs a notification message containing a Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Routing Bridge (RBridge) identifier associated with a Fiber Channel router. The device management module operates in conjunction with the packet processor and terminates TRILL forwarding for a received TRILL packet with the RBridge identifier as an egress RBridge identifier.
Description
BACKGROUND

Field


The present disclosure relates to network management. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a method and system for efficient integration of a storage area network to a Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) network.


Related Art


The exponential growth of the Internet has made it a popular delivery medium for multimedia applications, such as video on demand and television. Such applications have brought with them an increasing demand for bandwidth. As a result, equipment vendors race to build larger and faster switches with versatile capabilities, such as Fibre Channel (FC) connectivity, to move more traffic efficiently. However, the size of a switch cannot grow infinitely. It is limited by physical space, power consumption, and design complexity, to name a few factors. Furthermore, switches with higher capability are usually more complex and expensive. More importantly, because an overly large and complex system often does not provide economy of scale, simply increasing the size and capability of a switch may prove economically unviable due to the increased per-port cost.


A flexible way to improve the scalability of a switch system is to build a fabric switch. A fabric switch is a collection of individual member switches. These member switches form a single, logical switch that can have an arbitrary number of ports and an arbitrary topology. As demands grow, customers can adopt a “pay as you grow” approach to scale up the capacity of the fabric switch.


Meanwhile, layer-2 (e.g., Ethernet) switching technologies continue to evolve. More routing-like functionalities, which have traditionally been the characteristics of layer-3 (e.g., Internet Protocol or IP) networks, are migrating into layer-2. Notably, the recent development of the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) protocol allows Ethernet switches to function more like routing devices. TRILL overcomes the inherent inefficiency of the conventional spanning tree protocol, which forces layer-2 switches to be coupled in a logical spanning-tree topology to avoid looping. TRILL allows routing bridges (RBridges) to be coupled in an arbitrary topology without the risk of looping by implementing routing functions in switches and including a hop count in the TRILL header.


As more data-intensive applications are deployed, high-performance layer-2 communication to a storage area network is becoming progressively more important as a value proposition for network architects. It is desirable to provide data flows from a storage device with a quality of service while providing the flexibility and ease of deployment of the layer-2 communication.


While TRILL brings many desirable features to a network, some issues remain unsolved in efficient Fibre Channel integration.


SUMMARY

One embodiment of the present invention provides a switch. The switch includes one or more ports capable of receiving packets based on a first protocol, a packet processor, and a device management module. During operation, the packet processor constructs a notification message containing a switch identifier which is based on a second protocol and associated with a router that operates on the first protocol. The device management module operates in conjunction with the packet processor and terminates forwarding for a packet which is encapsulated with the second protocol and has the switch identifier based on the second protocol as an egress RBridge identifier.


In a variation on this embodiment, the first protocol is a Fibre Channel protocol. The second protocol is a Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) protocol. The switch identifier is a Routing Bridge (RBridge) identifier. The router that operates on the first protocol is a Fibre Channel router. Furthermore, the packet processor extracts a Fibre Channel packet from a received TRILL packet. The destination address of the Fibre Channel packet corresponds to the Fibre Channel router.


In a further variation on this embodiment, the Fibre Channel packet is encapsulated in an Ethernet frame.


In a variation on this embodiment, the device management module identifies a media access control (MAC) address of the router that operates on the first protocol as a local MAC address associated with the switch.


In a variation on this embodiment, the switch also includes an identification module and a flow control module. The identification module identifies a class of service associated with the Fibre Channel router. The flow control module configures priority-based flow control associated with the class of service.


In a further variation on this embodiment, the packet processor creates a notification message for a remote switch in response to identifying the class of service. The notification message contains the class of service associated with the priority-based flow control configured for the switch.


In a variation on this embodiment, the packet processor is further configurable to construct a notification message for a remote switch, wherein the notification message contains information learned locally.


In a variation on this embodiment, the switch also includes a forwarding module which makes local routing decision for a TRILL packet using a routing protocol instance. The TRILL packet contains a Fibre Channel packet or a non-Fibre Channel packet.


In a further variation on this embodiment, the routing protocol corresponds to one of: 1) Open Shortest Path First (OSPF); 2) Intermediate System To Intermediate System (IS-IS); and 3) Distance-vector.


In a variation on this embodiment, the switch also includes a fabric switch management module which maintains a membership in a fabric switch. Such a fabric switch accommodates a plurality of switches and operates as a single logical switch.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary TRILL network coupled to virtualized Fiber Channel (FC) routers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary TRILL network coupled to virtualized FC routers with hierarchical interconnections, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary network configuration of a TRILL network coupled to virtualized FC routers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2B illustrates an exemplary network configuration of a TRILL network with hybrid RBridges coupled to servers and virtualized FC routers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a hybrid RBridge distributing priority-based flow control configuration information to other RBridges in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge self-configuring priority-based flow control based on received information from another RBridge in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a hybrid RBridge distributing virtualized FC connectivity information to other RBridges in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge learning about other networking devices via a TRILL port, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge forwarding an Ethernet-encapsulated FC packet received from an end device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a hybrid RBridge processing a TRILL packet, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary RBridge, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the claims.


Overview


In embodiments of the present invention, the problem of extending a Fibre Channel (FC) fabric domain to a Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) network is solved by facilitating packet forwarding in the TRILL network toward FC routers. Typically, a storage area network is dedicated to provide access to unit-level data (e.g., a data block) from target storage devices. Such a storage area network can make a storage device, such as a disk array, accessible to a remote server (i.e., a server not locally coupled to the storage device) such a way that the target appears as a storage device locally coupled to the server. Fibre Channel (FC) is a networking technology designed for efficiently move data through a storage area network. More details on FC network architecture, protocols, naming/address conventions, and various standards are available in the documentation available from the NCITS/ANSI T11 committee (www.t11.org) and publicly available literature, such as “Designing Storage Area Networks,” by Tom Clark, 2nd Ed., Addison Wesley, 2003, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.


FC provides quality of service to a data flow between a server and a storage device, such as a RAID array or a tape backup device. However, to benefit from FC, a respective server requires a dedicated FC network interface card. Because a server typically exchanges information with a non-FC device via a layer-2 communication protocol, such as Ethernet, the server needs another network interface card (e.g., Ethernet network interface card) to communicate with the non-FC device. As a result, the server requires at least two interface cards (i.e., an Ethernet and an FC interface cards) to operate. Equipping a respective server with multiple interface cards in a large server farm incurs a high deployment cost. More importantly, multiple interfaces cards in a respective server lead to substantial power consumption, a high operational cost, and a large carbon foot-print for the server farm.


To solve this problem, FC routing capability can be integrated with an RBridge. An RBridge with FC routing capability can be referred to as a hybrid RBridge. One or more hybrid RBridges can be deployed in a TRILL network to couple a storage area network (i.e., an FC fabric) with the TRILL network. A respective hybrid RBridge presents the locally coupled FC routers as virtual RBridges to rest of the TRILL network and facilitate packet forwarding towards the FC routers in the TRILL network. Note that the rest of the TRILL network perceives a respective virtual RBridge as a regular RBridge coupled to the hybrid RBridge. A layer-2 (e.g., Ethernet) interface card couples a respective server with the TRILL network. To communicate with a target storage device, the server creates an FC packet for a corresponding FC router, encapsulates the FC packet in an Ethernet frame, and forwards the frame via the Ethernet interface card to the TRILL network. This encapsulation can be referred to as Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE). An FC packet encapsulated in an Ethernet frame can be referred to as an FCoE frame.


Upon receiving the FCoE frame, an ingress RBridge identifies the destination of the frame to be a virtual RBridge. The ingress RBridge in the TRILL network is not aware of the FC routing capability of the hybrid RBridge. Hence, the ingress RBridge encapsulates the frame in a TRILL packet and forwards the frame toward the virtual RBridge. When the hybrid RBridge associated with the virtual RBridge receives the packet, the hybrid RBridge extracts the FC packet and forwards the FC packet to the FC router corresponding to the virtual RBridge. The FC router, in turn, forwards the frame to the target. In this way, the hybrid RBridge enables the server to communicate with a target storage device with the flexibility of a TRILL network and the performance of an FC fabric while using a single interface.


In some embodiments, the TRILL network is a fabric switch and a respective RBridge in the TRILL network is a member switch of the fabric switch. The fabric switch can be an Ethernet fabric switch. In an Ethernet fabric switch, any number of switches coupled in an arbitrary topology may logically operate as a single switch. Any new switch may join or leave the fabric switch in “plug-and-play” mode without any manual configuration. A fabric switch appears as a single logical switch to the end device.


In a fabric switch, the hybrid RBridge also virtualizes a respective FC router and presents the FC router to the rest of the fabric switch as a virtual member switch coupled to the hybrid RBridge. In some embodiments, the control plane of the fabric switch operates as a Fibre Channel fabric. Consequently, the hybrid RBridge can use the domain identifier of an FC router as the identifier to the virtual member switch. In this way, the hybrid RBridge extends the FC fabric domain to the fabric switch domain.


Although the present disclosure is presented using examples based on TRILL and FC, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to networks defined using TRILL, FC, or a particular Open System Interconnection Reference Model (OSI reference model) layer. For example, embodiments of the present invention can also be applied to a multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) network. In this disclosure, the term “TRILL network” is used in a generic sense, and can refer to any networking layer, sub-layer, or a combination of networking layers. The term “Fibre Channel” or “FC” is also used in a generic sense, and can refer to any networking technology for a storage area network.


The term “RBridge” refers to routing bridges, which are bridges implementing the TRILL protocol as described in Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments (RFC) “Routing Bridges (RBridges): Base Protocol Specification,” available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6325, which is incorporated by reference herein. Embodiments of the present invention are not limited to application among RBridges. Other types of switches, routers, and forwarders can also be used.


In this disclosure, the term “edge port” refers to a port on an RBridge which sends/receives data frames in native Ethernet format. The term “TRILL port” refers to a port which sends/receives data frames encapsulated with a TRILL header and outer MAC header.


The term “end device” can refer a host, a conventional layer-2 switch, or any other type of network device. Additionally, an end device can be coupled to other switches or hosts further away from a network. An end device can also be an aggregation point for a number of network devices to enter the network. From a storage area network's perspective, an end device can be a server requesting data from the storage area network. In this disclosure, the terms “end device” and “sever” are used interchangeably.


The term “switch identifier” refers to a group of bits that can be used to identify a switch. If the switch is an RBridge, the switch identifier can be an “RBridge identifier.” If the switch is an FC router, the switch identifier can be a “domain identifier.” Note that the TRILL standard uses “RBridge ID” to denote a 48-bit Intermediate-System-to-Intermediate-System (IS-IS) ID assigned to an RBridge, and “RBridge nickname” to denote a 16-bit value that serves as an abbreviation for the “RBridge ID.” In this disclosure, “switch identifier” is used as a generic term, is not limited to any bit format, and can refer to any format that can identify a switch. The term “RBridge identifier” is used in a generic sense, is not limited to any bit format, and can refer to “RBridge ID,” “RBridge nickname,” or any other format that can identify an RBridge. The term “domain identifier” is also used in a generic sense, is not limited to any bit format, and can refer to any group of bits that uniquely identify a switch in an FC fabric.


The term “frame” refers to a group of bits that can be transported together across a network. “Frame” should not be interpreted as limiting embodiments of the present invention to layer-2 networks. “Frame” can be replaced by other terminologies referring to a group of bits, such as “packet,” “cell,” or “datagram.”


The term “switch” is used in a generic sense, and it can refer to any standalone or fabric switch operating in any network layer. “Switch” should not be interpreted as limiting embodiments of the present invention to layer-2 networks. Any device that can forward traffic to an end device can be referred to as a “switch.” Examples of a “switch” include, but are not limited to, a layer-2 switch, a layer-3 router, a TRILL RBridge, an FC router, or an FC switch.


The term “Ethernet fabric switch” refers to a number of interconnected physical switches which form a single, scalable logical switch. In a fabric switch, any number of switches can be connected in an arbitrary topology, and the entire group of switches functions together as one single, logical switch. This feature makes it possible to use many smaller, inexpensive switches to construct a large fabric switch, which can be viewed as a single logical switch externally.


Network Architecture



FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary TRILL network coupled to virtualized FC routers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 1, a TRILL network 100 includes RBridges 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, and 107. End devices 112 and 114 are servers coupled to network 100 via RBridges 104 and 103, respectively. RBridges in network 100 use edge ports to communicate to end devices and TRILL ports to communicate to other RBridges. Data frames transmitted and received via TRILL ports are encapsulated in TRILL headers. For example, RBridge 104 is coupled to end device 112 via an edge port and to RBridges 105, 101, and 102 via TRILL ports. In this example, RBridges 101, 102, and 103 are hybrid RBridges with FC routing capabilities, and coupled to storage area network 150.


In some embodiments, storage area network 150 is an FC fabric and includes FC routers 122, 124, and 126. Target storage devices 142, 144, and 146 are coupled to FC routers 122, 124, and 126, respectively. FC fabric 150 is dedicated to provide access to data blocks from targets 142, 144, and 146. Typically, to access targets 142, 144, and 146, servers 112 and 114 require dedicated FC network interface cards. Servers 112 and 114 also need another network interface card (e.g., Ethernet network interface card) to communicate with non-FC devices. Equipping server 112 and 114 with multiple interface cards incurs a high deployment cost and substantial power consumption.


To solve this problem, hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 present FC routers 122, 124, and 126 as virtual RBridges 132, 134, and 136, respectively, to RBridges 104, 105, 106, and 107. Note that RBridges 104, 105, 106, and 107 perceive virtual RBridges 132, 134, and 136 as regular RBridges coupled to hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103, respectively. In some embodiments, network 100 is a fabric switch and the RBridges in network 100 are member switches of the fabric switch. This fabric switch appears as a single logical switch to servers 112 and 114.


In some embodiments, the control plane for network 100 operates as a FC fabric and RBridge identifiers in network 100 are in the same format as the domain identifier of FC routers 122, 124, and 126. Hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 advertize the domain identifiers of FC routers 122, 124, and 126 as the identifiers of virtual RBridges 132, 134, and 136. In this way, hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 extend the domain of storage area network 150 to the domain of network 100. As a result, a single routing protocol instance in a respective RBridge in network 100 can make routing decisions for TRILL packets containing Fibre Channel or non-Fibre Channel packets. Examples of the routing protocol can include, but are not limited to Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol, Intermediate System To Intermediate System (IS-IS) routing protocol, and Distance-vector routing protocol.


During operation, hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103, optionally, learns about targets 142, 144, and 146, from FC routers 122, 124, and 126, respectively. Hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103, in turn, create and send notification messages to RBridges 104, 105, 106, and 107 indicating that targets 142, 144, and 146 are coupled to virtual RBridges 132, 134, and 136, respectively. To communicate with target 142, server 112 creates an FC packet, encapsulates the FC packet in an Ethernet frame, and forwards the FCoE frame to ingress RBridge 104. While constructing the FCoE frame, server 112 assigns a domain identifier of FC router 122 as the destination address of the inner FC packet and the MAC address of FC router 122 as the destination address of the Ethernet frame.


In some embodiments, upon receiving the FCoE frame, RBridge 104 checks the encapsulated FC packet and identifies destination target 142 to be coupled to virtual RBridge 132. RBridge 104 is not aware of the FC routing capability of hybrid RBridge 101. Hence, RBridge 104 simply uses regular TRILL routing for forwarding the FCoE frame to virtual RBridge 132. Using the local routing protocol instance, RBridge 104 determines the next-hop RBridge to be RBridge 101. RBridge 104 then encapsulates the FCoE frame in a TRILL packet destined to virtual RBridge 132 (i.e., with the identifier of virtual RBridge 132 as the egress RBridge identifier) and forwards the packet to hybrid RBridge 101. In some embodiments, hybrid RBridge 101 marks the RBridge identifier of virtual RBridge 132 as a local RBridge identifier (i.e., as belonging to hybrid RBridge 101). Upon receiving the TRILL packet, hybrid RBridge 101 recognizes the RBridge identifier as a local RBridge identifier and terminates TRILL forwarding for the packet.


In some embodiments, hybrid RBridge 101 marks the MAC address of FC router 122 as a local MAC address. The MAC address of FC router 122 can be derived from the domain identifier of FC router 122. Hybrid RBridge 101 then extracts the FCoE frame from the TRILL packet and recognizes the destination address of the FCoE frame to be a local MAC address. In other words, hybrid RBridge 101 considers the FCoE frame to be destined to itself. As a result, hybrid RBridge 101 decapsulates the Ethernet frame, promotes the internal FC packet to the upper layer, and forwards the FC packet to FC router 122 coupled to target 142. Similarly, server 114 can communicate with target 144 via hybrid RBridges 103 and 102, and FC router 124. In this way, hybrid RBridge 101, 102, and 103 allow servers 112 and 114 to access targets 142, 144, and 146 via network 100 using one layer-2 interface.


In some embodiments, network 100 ensures automatic priority-based flow control configuration for all RBridges in network 100. Upon identifying FC router 122, hybrid RBridge 101 obtains the class of service associated with the FC traffic from FC router 122 and configures priority-based flow control for the class of service. In the same way, hybrid RBridges 102 and 103 also obtains the class of service for FC traffic from FC routers 124 and 126, respectively. Hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 propagate the associated configuration information to respective other RBridges in network 100. Upon receiving the configuration information, other RBridges self-configure the priority-based flow control for that specific class of service. In this way, RBridges in network 100 provide a desired quality of service to the FCoE frames.



FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary TRILL network coupled to virtualized FC routers hierarchical interconnections, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Components in FIG. 1B are the same as in FIG. 1A, so the same numerals are used to denote them. In this example, FC router 128 is coupled to FC routers 122, 124, and 126. FC router 128 virtualizes FC routers 122, 124, and 126, and presents targets 142, 144, and 146 to hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 as coupled to FC router 128. Hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103, in turn, present FC router 128 as virtual RBridge 138 to RBridges 104, 105, 106, and 107. To ensure a separation between network 100 and FC fabric 150, a respective local FC port of hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 can be an EX_port while the peer port of FC router 128 can be an E port. As a result, topology information of network 100 is not propagated to FC fabric 150.


During operation, to communicate with target 144, server 114 creates an FCoE frame, and forwards the FCoE frame to ingress RBridge 103. RBridge 103 checks the encapsulated FC packet and identifies destination target 144 to be coupled to virtual RBridge 138. RBridge 103 recognizes the identifier of virtual RBridge to be a local identifier, extracts the FC packet from the FCoE frame, and forwards the FC packet to FC router 128. FC router 128, in turn, forwards the FC packet to FC router 124 coupled to target 144. Similarly, server 112 communicates with target 146 via RBridge 104, hybrid RBridge 101, and FC router 128.


In some embodiments, FC router 128 provides zoning support to targets 142, 144, and 146. Such zoning support is required to create logical partitions in FC fabric 150. A respective logical partition enables a selective communication between hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103, and targets 142, 144, and 146. In some embodiments, FC router 128 uses the logical partitions to present the targets as parts of different storage area networks. For example, if targets 142 and 144 belong to one zone while target 146 belongs to a different zone, FC router 128 presents a respective zone to hybrid RBridge 101, 102, and 103 as separate storage area networks. Consequently, hybrid RBridge 101, 102, and 103 create a virtual RBridge for targets 142 and 144, while another virtual RBridge for target 146.


Network Configuration



FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary network configuration of a TRILL network coupled to virtualized FC routers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, a TRILL network 200 includes TRILL RBridges 212, 214, and 216. Also included are RBridges 202 and 204, each with a number of Ethernet edge ports which can be coupled to end devices. For example, server 242 is coupled with RBridges 202 via an Ethernet edge port. Network 200 also includes hybrid RBridges 222 and 224, each with a number of edge ports for coupling end devices, and a number of FC ports for coupling FC routers. For example, RBridges 224 is coupled with server 244 via an Ethernet edge port and with FC router 232 via an FC EX_port, separating the topology information of network 200 from the FC domain. In some embodiments, hybrid RBridges 222 and 224 have only TRILL and FC ports, and not any Ethernet port. For example, hybrid RBridge 222 can operate without any Ethernet port because no end device is coupled with hybrid RBridge 222. RBridges in network 200 are interconnected with each other using TRILL ports.


Hybrid RBridge 222 creates a notification message presenting FC router 232 as virtual RBridge 234 and target 236 as a storage device coupled to virtual RBridge 234. Hybrid RBridge 222 then sends the notification message to all other RBridges in network. Upon receiving the message, other RBridges considers virtual RBridge 234 as a result RBridge coupled to hybrid RBridge 222. In some embodiments, network 200 is a fabric switch, wherein the notification message is created using an internal messaging service of the fabric switch.


Hybrid RBridges 222 and 224 in network 200 enables server 242 to communicate with target 236 in FC domain via an Ethernet port. During operation, to communicate with target 236, server 242 creates an FCoE frame, and forwards the FCoE frame to ingress RBridge 202 via an Ethernet interface. RBridge 202 checks the encapsulated FC packet and identifies destination target 236 to be coupled to virtual RBridge 234. RBridge 202 encapsulates the FCoE frame in a TRILL packet destined to virtual RBridge 234 and forwards the packet to one of the intermediate RBridges 212, 214, and 216. Because TRILL supports equal-cost multipath routing, a respective TRILL packet from RBridge 202 can be routed to hybrid RBridge 222 via any of RBridges 212, 214, and 216. Because the identifier of virtual RBridge 234 is a local identifier in hybrid RBridge, upon receiving the TRILL packet, hybrid RBridge 222 recognizes the packet to be destined to virtual RBridge 234. Hybrid RBridge 222 then extracts the FC packet and forwards the FC packet to FC router 232 coupled to target 236. Though other RBridges in network 200 perceives virtual RBridge 234 to be coupled to hybrid RBridge 222 via a TRILL port, hybrid RBridge 222 actually forwards the FC packet via a local FC EX_port.


In some embodiments, hybrid RBridges 222 and 224 can also forward non-FC traffic. Server 244 is coupled to hybrid RBridge 224 via an Ethernet port. To communicate with server 244, server 242 creates an Ethernet frame, and forwards the frame to ingress RBridge 202. RBridge 202 checks the destination of the frame and identifies destination server 244 to be coupled to hybrid RBridge 224. RBridge 202 encapsulates the frame in a TRILL packet destined to egress RBridge 224 and forwards the packet to RBridge 224 via one of the intermediate RBridges 212, 214, and 216. Upon receiving the TRILL packet, hybrid RBridge 224 recognizes the TRILL packet to be destined to itself, extracts the Ethernet frame, and forwards the Ethernet frame to server 244. In this way, a hybrid RBridge can forward Ethernet traffic as well as storage (e.g., FC) traffic.



FIG. 2B illustrates an exemplary network configuration of a TRILL network with hybrid RBridges coupled to servers and virtualized FC routers, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, a TRILL network 250 includes TRILL RBridges 262 and 264. Also included are hybrid RBridges 252 and 254, each with a number of edge ports for coupling end devices, and a number of FC ports for coupling FC routers. For example, RBridges 254 is coupled with server 282 via an Ethernet edge port and with FC router 272 via an FC EX_port, separating the topology information of network 250 from the FC domain. Hybrid RBridge 254 creates a notification message presenting FC router 272 as virtual RBridge 274 and target 276 as a storage device coupled to virtual RBridge 274. Hybrid RBridge 254 then sends the notification message to all other RBridges in network. In some embodiments, network 250 is a fabric switch, wherein the notification message is created using an internal messaging service of the fabric switch.


In some embodiments, hybrid RBridge 254 marks the MAC address of FC router 272 as a local MAC address. The MAC address of FC router 272 can be derived from the domain identifier of FC router 272. During operation, to communicate with target 276, server 282 creates an FCoE frame, and forwards the FCoE frame to hybrid RBridge 254 via an Ethernet port. Upon receiving the FCoE frame, hybrid RBridge 254 recognizes the MAC address of the FCoE frame to be a local MAC address and considers the FCoE frame to be destined to itself. As a result, hybrid RBridge 254 extracts the internal FC packet from the FCoE frame and promotes the frame to the upper layer. In the upper layer, hybrid RBridge 254 identifies target 276 as the destination of the FC packet and forwards the FC packet to FC router 272 coupled to target 276. In this way, when hybrid RBridge 254 is coupled to server 282, hybrid RBridge 254 can forward traffic to FC domain without encapsulating the FCoE frame in a TRILL packet. This reduces the load on inter-switch links of network 250.


However, hybrid RBridge 254 still presents FC router 272 as virtual RBridge 274 for other servers coupled to network 250. For example, to communicate with target 276, server 286 creates an FCoE frame and forwards the frame to RBridge 262. Upon receiving the FCoE frame, ingress RBridge 262 encapsulates the frame in a TRILL packet destined to virtual RBridge 274 and forwards the packet to hybrid RBridge 254. Hybrid RBridge 254 receives the TRILL packet, recognizes the TRILL packet to be destined to virtual RBridge 274, extracts the FC packet, and forwards the FC packet to FC router 272 coupled to target 276. Hence, FC router virtualization is required in network 250 even when a hybrid RBridge can forward traffic to FC domain without encapsulating an FCoE frame in a TRILL packet.


Priority-Based Flow Control


Priority-based flow control facilitates different classes of service for flow control of Ethernet frames. Such flow control enables control over a respective data flow on shared links. Priority-based flow control allows FCoE frames to receive a lossless service from a link shared with traditional lost-tolerant traffic. To facilitate priority-based flow control, whenever a hybrid RBridge learns about a target, the hybrid RBridge configures a class of service associated with the FCoE frames and propagates the configuration information to other RBridges in the TRILL network. FIG. 3A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a hybrid RBridge distributing priority-based flow control configuration information to other RBridges in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The hybrid RBridge first receives class of service information associated with FC traffic from a locally coupled FC router (operation 302). The hybrid RBridge then creates a buffer dedicated for the FCoE frames belonging to the class of service (operation 304). In some embodiments, a network administrator can configure the priority-based flow control in the hybrid RBridge.


The hybrid RBridge then creates a notification message containing the priority-based flow control configuration for other RBridges in the TRILL network (e.g., other member switches in a fabric switch) (operation 306). This notification message can be an Ethernet control message. The hybrid RBridge encapsulates the notification message in a TRILL packet (operation 308) and sends the TRILL packet to other RBridges (operation 310). In some embodiments, the hybrid RBridge uses multicast to distribute the notification message.



FIG. 3B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge self-configuring priority-based flow control based on received information from another RBridge in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Upon receiving a notification message from another RBridge (operation 352), the RBridge extracts the content from the notification message (operation 354). In some embodiments, the extraction of the content includes decapsulation of a TRILL header of an Ethernet frame. The RBridge then checks whether the notification message contains any priority-based flow control configuration (operation 356). In some embodiments, the RBridge examines a message type and an associated operation code of the message to determine whether the message pertains to priority-based flow control. If the message does not contain any priority-based flow control configuration, the RBridge takes action based on the content of the message (operation 358).


If the message contains priority-based flow control configuration, the RBridge identifies the class of service from the configuration (operation 362). In some embodiments, the RBridge identifies the class of service by identifying a priority value associated with the class in the message. The RBridge then dedicates a buffer for the class of service (operation 364) and initiates priority-based flow control for the class of service (operation 366). Such initiation can include, but is not limited to, monitoring the dedicated buffer, identifying a potential overflow, and calculating time to transmit frames, both current and incoming, from the buffer. In some embodiments, the RBridge uses priority-based flow control specified by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) specification 802.1Qbb, “Priority-based Flow Control,” available at http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/802.1bb.html, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.


In the example in FIG. 1, when hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 learn about FC routers 122, 124, and 126, hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103 dynamically virtualize FC routers 122, 124, and 126, and present them as virtual RBridges 132, 134, and 136, respectively, by sending notification messages to RBridges 104, 105, 106, and 107. Upon receiving the notification messages, RBridges 104, 105, 106, and 107 dynamically learn about virtual RBridges 132, 134, and 136 as regular RBridges coupled to hybrid RBridges 101, 102, and 103, respectively. FIG. 4A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a hybrid RBridge distributing virtualized FC connectivity information to other RBridges in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Upon detecting a new networking device (operation 402), the hybrid RBridge checks whether the detected device is an FC router (operation 404). If not, then the hybrid RBridge checks whether the detected device is an end device (operation 406). Note that the detected end device can be a server.


If the detected device is an end device, the hybrid RBridge creates a notification message identifying the end device (operation 424). In some embodiments, the hybrid RBridge detects the end device by learning the MAC address of the end device from a received frame and includes the learned MAC address in the notification message. If the detected device is not an FC router or an end device, the detected device is a new RBridge joining the TRILL network. The hybrid RBridge then creates a notification message identifying the RBridge (operation 422). In some embodiments, the hybrid RBridge detects the new RBridge from a received notification message from another RBridge.


If the identified networking device is an FC router (operation 404), the hybrid RBridge marks the layer-2 identifier of the FC router as a local identifier (operation 412). For example, if the identifier is a MAC address, the hybrid RBridge marks the MAC address of the FC router as a local MAC address. The hybrid RBridge then virtualizes the FC router as an RBridge (operation 414). In some embodiments, the RBridge identifier and the FC domain identifier have the same format, and the domain identifier of the FC router is used as the virtual RBridge identifier. Hybrid RBridge creates a notification message identifying the FC router as a (virtual) RBridge (operation 416). Note that the RBridges receiving the notification message recognize the FC router as a regular RBridge.


The hybrid RBridge can, optionally, learn about the target storage devices coupled to the FC router (operation 426) and associates the targets with the (virtual) RBridge in the notification message (operation 428). After creating a notification message identifying the detected networking device (operation 422, 424, or 428), the hybrid RBridge forwards the notification message to all other RBridges in the TRILL network. In some embodiments, the hybrid RBridge and the other RBridges in the TRILL network can be member switches of a fabric switch. The hybrid RBridge can use an internal messaging service of the fabric switch to create the notification message.



FIG. 4B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge learning about other networking devices via a TRILL port, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Upon receiving a notification message from a remote RBridge (operation 452), the RBridge checks whether the notification message contains information about one or more end devices (operation 454). If the notification contains end device information, the RBridge associates the end devices with the ingress RBridge of the message (operation 462). The RBridge then checks whether the ingress RBridge is a new RBridge (operation 464). A new RBridge is an RBridge for which the RBridge does not already have information stored in a local database. In some embodiments, the local database maintains the state of a fabric switch and is used to manage the member switches. If the notification message does not contain end device information (operation 454), the notification message contains information about a new RBridge. If the message contains information about a new RBridge (operation 454 or 464), the RBridge stores the new RBridges information in a local database (operation 456). Note that the new RBridge information can include the associated end device information as well.


Frame Processing



FIG. 5 presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge forwarding an Ethernet-encapsulated FC packet received from an end device, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The RBridge first receives an FCoE frame from the end device via a local edge port (operation 502). The end device can be a server accessing data from a target storage device in a storage area network. The RBridge then examines the internal FC packet of the receiving FCoE frame to identify the target of the FC frame (operation 504) and identifies the RBridge coupled to the target (operation 506). Note that the identified RBridge can be a virtual RBridge. However, the RBridge considers the virtual RBridge as a regular RBridge and is not aware that the virtual RBridge is actually an FC router.


The RBridge encapsulates the received FCoE frame in a TRILL packet with an identifier of the virtual RBridge as the egress RBridge identifier (operation 508). The RBridge uses local forwarding information to identify the next hop RBridge and assigns the MAC address of the next hop RBridge as the destination address of the outer Ethernet header of the TRILL packet (operation 510). Note that the RBridge uses the same local forwarding information to determine routes for both FC and non-FC traffic. The RBridge forwards the TRILL packet to the next hop RBridge (operation 512). For the example in FIG. 2A, RBridge 202 encapsulates an FCoE frame for target 236 received from server 242 in a TRILL packet with an identifier of virtual RBridge 234 as the egress RBridge identifier. RBridge 202 identifies RBridge 212 as the next hop RBridge and assigns the MAC address of RBridge 212 as the destination address of the outer Ethernet header of the TRILL packet. RBridge 202 then forwards the TRILL packet to RBridge 212 based on the local forwarding information. Because the egress RBridge of the TRILL packet is RBridge 222, intermediate RBridge 212 does not examine the internal FC frame and forwards the TRILL packet to RBridge 222 using regular TRILL routing.



FIG. 6 presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a hybrid RBridge processing a TRILL packet, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The hybrid RBridge first receives a TRILL packet via a TRILL port (operation 602). The TRILL port couples another RBridge via an inter-switch link. The hybrid RBridge checks whether the TRILL packet is for the local RBridge (i.e., the hybrid RBridge) (operation 604). If not, the TRILL packet is for another RBridge and the hybrid RBridge forwards the packet to the next hop RBridge (operation 628). If the TRILL packet is for the local RBridge, the hybrid RBridge extracts the internal frame from the TRILL packet (operation 606). The hybrid RBridge checks whether the extracted frame is for the local RBridge (operation 610). If the frame is for the local RBridge, the hybrid RBridge decapsulates the frame and the inner packet is promoted to the upper layer (operation 612).


In some embodiments, the hybrid RBridge marks the MAC address of the virtual RBridge (i.e., the FC router) as a local MAC address. Hence, the decapsulated packet can be an FC packet for an FC router coupled to the hybrid RBridge. The hybrid RBridge checks whether the packet is an FC packet (operation 614). If so, the hybrid RBridge identifies the target of the FC packet (operation 616) and the FC router coupled to the target (operation 618). The hybrid RBridge then forwards the FC packet to the FC router via a local FC port (operation 620). In some embodiments, the FC port is an EX_port. If the frame is not for the local RBridge (operation 610), the frame is for an end device coupled to the RBridge via a layer-2 interconnection. If the internal packet is not an FC packet (operation 614), the packet is for an end device coupled to the RBridge via a layer-3 interconnection. The RBridge identifies the end device (operation 622) and forwards the frame or packet to the end device (operation 624).


Exemplary RBride



FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary RBridge, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, an RBridge 700 includes a number of communication ports 702, a flow control module 720, a device management module 730, an identification module 732, a packet processor 710, a forwarding module 740, and a storage 750. Forwarding module 720 makes local routing decision for a respective TRILL packet using a single routing protocol instance. The TRILL packet can contain an FCoE frame or a regular Ethernet frame (i.e., a non-FC frame). RBridge 700 can generate the TRILL or the FC packet using packet processor 710, or receive via one of the communication ports 702. Examples of the routing protocol can include, but are not limited to OSPF, IS-IS, and Distance-vector. Communication ports 702 can include one or more ports capable of receiving frames encapsulated in a TRILL header and/or an FC header. Packet processor 710 can process these frames.


In some embodiments, RBridge 700 may maintain a membership in a fabric switch, wherein RBridge 700 also includes a fabric switch management module 760. Fabric switch management module 760 maintains a configuration database in storage 750 that maintains the configuration state of a respective switch within the fabric switch. Fabric switch management module 760 maintains the state of the fabric switch, which is used to join other switches. Under such a scenario, communication ports 702 can include inter-switch communication channels for communication within a fabric switch. This inter-switch communication channel can be implemented via a regular communication port and based on any open or proprietary format.


During operation, RBridge 700 detects an FC router coupled to RBridge 700. RBridge 700 virtualizes the FC router and presents the FC router as a virtual RBridge to the rest of the TRILL network. Packet processor 710 constructs a notification message containing an RBridge identifier associated with the FC router. Device management module 730 operates in conjunction with packet processor 710 and checks whether a received TRILL packet has the RBridge identifier as the egress RBridge identifier. If so, device management module 730 terminates TRILL forwarding for the packet and packet processor 710 extracts an Ethernet frame from the TRILL packet. Device management module 730 identifies a MAC address of the FC router configured as a local address. If the MAC address of the Ethernet frame matches the MAC address of the FC router, packet processor 710 extracts an FC packet from the Ethernet frame.


Identification module 732 identifies a class of service associated with the FC router. Flow control module 720 then configures priority-based flow control associated with the class of service for RBridge 700. Packet processor 710 creates a notification message for a remote RBridge, which can be a member switch of a fabric switch, in response to identifying the class of service. The notification message can contain the class of service associated with the priority-based flow control configured for RBridge 700. When RBridge 700 learns information about a networking device, such as a MAC address, via one of the communication ports 702, packet processor 710 constructs a notification message for the remote RBridge containing the learned information.


Note that the above-mentioned modules can be implemented in hardware as well as in software. In one embodiment, these modules can be embodied in computer-executable instructions stored in a memory which is coupled to one or more processors in RBridge 700. When executed, these instructions cause the processor(s) to perform the aforementioned functions.


In summary, embodiments of the present invention provide a switch and a method for integrating a TRILL network with a storage area network. In one embodiment, the switch includes a packet processor and a device management module. During operation, the packet processor constructs a notification message containing a Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Routing Bridge (RBridge) identifier associated with a Fibre Channel router. The device management module operates in conjunction with the packet processor and terminates TRILL forwarding for a received TRILL packet with the RBridge identifier as an egress RBridge identifier.


The methods and processes described herein can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable non-transitory storage medium. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable non-transitory storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the medium.


The methods and processes described herein can be executed by and/or included in hardware modules or apparatus. These modules or apparatus may include, but are not limited to, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a dedicated or shared processor that executes a particular software module or a piece of code at a particular time, and/or other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules or apparatus are activated, they perform the methods and processes included within them.


The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit this disclosure. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A first switch, comprising: a plurality of ports comprising a first port capable of forwarding based on a first protocol in a network of interconnected switches and a second port capable of forwarding based on a second protocol;a packet processor configured to: construct a notification message indicating a physical switch identifier of a second switch, which operates based on the second protocol, as a second switch identifier of a third switch capable of operating based on the first protocol, wherein the physical switch identifier and the second switch identifier are of a same format;determine the first port as an output port for the notification message, wherein the first port corresponds to another switch; anddetermine the second port as an output port for a packet with the physical switch identifier as an egress switch identifier based on the physical switch identifier, wherein the second port corresponds to the second switch.
  • 2. The first switch of claim 1, wherein the packet processor is further configured to extract the packet by decapsulating an encapsulation header associated with the first protocol, wherein the destination address of the encapsulation header corresponds to the third switch.
  • 3. The first switch of claim 2, wherein the packet is a Fibre Channel packet, and wherein the second switch is a Fibre Channel router.
  • 4. The first switch of claim 1, further comprising device management circuitry configured to: terminate forwarding for an Ethernet header of the packet, prior to determining the second port as an output port, by identifying a media access control (MAC) address of the second switch as a local address associated with the first switch.
  • 5. The first switch of claim 1, further comprising: identification circuitry configured to identify a first class of service associated with the second switch based on the second protocol; andflow control circuitry configured to, corresponding to the first class of service, configure a second class of service based on priority-based flow control for the first switch.
  • 6. The first switch of claim 5, wherein the packet processor is further configured to create a notification message for a remote switch in the network of interconnected switches in response to identifying the first class of service, wherein the notification message includes the second class of service configured for the first switch.
  • 7. The first switch of claim 1, wherein the packet processor is further configured to construct a notification message for a remote switch in the network of interconnected switches, wherein the notification message includes a MAC address learned from a port in the plurality of ports.
  • 8. The first switch of claim 1, further comprising forwarding circuitry configured to make a local routing decision for a second packet using a routing protocol instance based on the first protocol, wherein the second packet includes an inner packet destined to a remote switch outside of the network of interconnected switches.
  • 9. The first switch of claim 8, wherein the routing protocol corresponds to one of: Open Shortest Path First (OSPF);Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS); andDistance-vector.
  • 10. The first switch of claim 1, further comprising a fabric switch management module configured to maintain a membership in the network of interconnected switches, wherein the network of interconnected switches is identified by a fabric identifier.
  • 11. A method, comprising: constructing, by a first switch, a notification message, wherein the first switch includes a plurality of ports comprising a first port capable of forwarding based on a first protocol in a network of interconnected switches and a second port capable of forwarding based on a second protocol;wherein the notification message indicates a physical switch identifier of a second switch, which operates based on the second protocol, as a second switch identifier of a third switch capable of operating based on the first protocol, wherein the physical switch identifier and the second switch identifier are of a same format; anddetermining the first port as an output port for the notification message, wherein the first port corresponds to another switch; anddetermining the second port as an output port for a packet with the physical switch identifier as an egress switch identifier based on the physical switch identifier, wherein the second port corresponds to the second switch.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the method further comprises extracting the packet by decapsulating an encapsulation header associated with the first protocol, wherein the destination address of the encapsulation header corresponds to the third switch.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the packet is a Fibre Channel packet, and wherein the second switch is a Fibre Channel router.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising: terminating forwarding for an Ethernet header of the packet, prior to determining the second port as an output port, by identifying a media access control (MAC) address of the second switch as a local address associated with the first switch.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, further comprising: identifying a first class of service associated with the second switch based on the second protocol; andcorresponding to the first class of service, configuring a second class of service based on priority-based flow control for the first switch.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising creating a notification message for a remote switch in the network of interconnected switches in response to identifying the first class of service, wherein the notification message includes the second class of service configured for the first switch.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, further comprising constructing a notification message for a remote switch in the network of interconnected switches, wherein the notification message includes a MAC address learned from a port in the plurality of ports of the first switch.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, further comprising making a local routing decision for a second packet using a routing protocol instance based on the first protocol, wherein the second packet includes an inner packet destined to a remote switch outside of the network of interconnected switches.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the routing protocol corresponds to one of: Open Shortest Path First (OSPF);Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS); andDistance-vector.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, further comprising maintaining a membership in the network of interconnected switches, wherein the network of interconnected switches is identified by a fabric identifier.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/557,268, titled “VCS FCoE: FC Interconnect,” by inventors Phanidhar Koganti and Suresh Vobbilisetty, filed 8 Nov. 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. The present disclosure is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/087,239, titled “Virtual Cluster Switching,” by inventors Suresh Vobbilisetty and Dilip Chatwani, filed 14 Apr. 2011, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/598,204, titled “End-to-End Lossless Ethernet in Ethernet Fabric,” by inventors Huan Song, Phanidhar Koganti, Mythilikanth Raman, and Rajnish Gupta, filed 29 Aug. 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (550)
Number Name Date Kind
5390173 Spinney Feb 1995 A
5802278 Isfeld Sep 1998 A
5878232 Marimuthu Mar 1999 A
5879173 Poplawski Mar 1999 A
5959968 Chin Sep 1999 A
5973278 Wehrli, III Oct 1999 A
5983278 Chong Nov 1999 A
5995262 Hirota Nov 1999 A
6041042 Bussiere Mar 2000 A
6085238 Yuasa Jul 2000 A
6092062 Lohman Jul 2000 A
6104696 Kadambi Aug 2000 A
6185214 Schwartz Feb 2001 B1
6185241 Sun Feb 2001 B1
6295527 McCormack Sep 2001 B1
6331983 Haggerty Dec 2001 B1
6438106 Pillar Aug 2002 B1
6498781 Bass Dec 2002 B1
6542266 Phillips Apr 2003 B1
6553029 Alexander Apr 2003 B1
6571355 Linnell May 2003 B1
6583902 Yuen Jun 2003 B1
6633761 Singhal Oct 2003 B1
6636963 Stein Oct 2003 B1
6771610 Seaman Aug 2004 B1
6870840 Hill Mar 2005 B1
6873602 Ambe Mar 2005 B1
6937576 DiBenedetto Aug 2005 B1
6956824 Mark Oct 2005 B2
6957269 Williams Oct 2005 B2
6975581 Medina Dec 2005 B1
6975864 Singhal Dec 2005 B2
7016352 Chow Mar 2006 B1
7061877 Gummalla Jun 2006 B1
7062177 Grivna Jun 2006 B1
7173934 Lapuh Feb 2007 B2
7197308 Singhal Mar 2007 B2
7206288 Cometto Apr 2007 B2
7310664 Merchant Dec 2007 B1
7313637 Tanaka Dec 2007 B2
7315545 Chowdhury et al. Jan 2008 B1
7316031 Griffith Jan 2008 B2
7330897 Baldwin Feb 2008 B2
7380025 Riggins May 2008 B1
7397794 Lacroute Jul 2008 B1
7430164 Bare Sep 2008 B2
7453888 Zabihi Nov 2008 B2
7477894 Sinha Jan 2009 B1
7480258 Shuen Jan 2009 B1
7508757 Ge Mar 2009 B2
7558195 Kuo Jul 2009 B1
7558273 Grosser, Jr. Jul 2009 B1
7571447 Ally Aug 2009 B2
7599901 Mital Oct 2009 B2
7688736 Walsh Mar 2010 B1
7688960 Aubuchon Mar 2010 B1
7690040 Frattura Mar 2010 B2
7706255 Kondrat et al. Apr 2010 B1
7716370 Devarapalli May 2010 B1
7720076 Dobbins May 2010 B2
7729296 Choudhary Jun 2010 B1
7787480 Mehta Aug 2010 B1
7792920 Istvan Sep 2010 B2
7796593 Ghosh Sep 2010 B1
7801021 Triantafillis Sep 2010 B1
7808992 Homchaudhuri Oct 2010 B2
7836332 Hara Nov 2010 B2
7843906 Chidambaram et al. Nov 2010 B1
7843907 Abou-Emara Nov 2010 B1
7860097 Lovett Dec 2010 B1
7898959 Arad Mar 2011 B1
7912091 Krishnan Mar 2011 B1
7924837 Shabtay Apr 2011 B1
7937438 Miller May 2011 B1
7937756 Kay May 2011 B2
7945941 Sinha May 2011 B2
7949638 Goodson May 2011 B1
7957386 Aggarwal Jun 2011 B1
8018938 Fromm Sep 2011 B1
8027354 Portolani Sep 2011 B1
8054832 Shukla Nov 2011 B1
8068442 Kompella Nov 2011 B1
8078704 Lee Dec 2011 B2
8090805 Chawla Jan 2012 B1
8102781 Smith Jan 2012 B2
8102791 Tang Jan 2012 B2
8116307 Thesayi Feb 2012 B1
8125928 Mehta Feb 2012 B2
8134922 Elangovan Mar 2012 B2
8155150 Chung Apr 2012 B1
8160063 Maltz Apr 2012 B2
8160080 Arad Apr 2012 B1
8170038 Belanger May 2012 B2
8175107 Yalagandula May 2012 B1
8194674 Pagel Jun 2012 B1
8195774 Lambeth Jun 2012 B2
8204061 Sane Jun 2012 B1
8213313 Doiron Jul 2012 B1
8213336 Smith Jul 2012 B2
8230069 Korupolu Jul 2012 B2
8239960 Frattura Aug 2012 B2
8249069 Raman Aug 2012 B2
8270401 Barnes Sep 2012 B1
8295291 Ramanathan Oct 2012 B1
8295921 Wang Oct 2012 B2
8301686 Appajodu Oct 2012 B1
8339994 Gnanasekaran Dec 2012 B2
8351352 Eastlake, III Jan 2013 B1
8369335 Jha Feb 2013 B2
8369347 Xiong Feb 2013 B2
8392496 Linden Mar 2013 B2
8451717 Venkataraman et al. May 2013 B2
8462774 Page Jun 2013 B2
8467375 Blair Jun 2013 B2
8520595 Yadav Aug 2013 B2
8599850 Jha Dec 2013 B2
8599864 Chung Dec 2013 B2
8615008 Natarajan Dec 2013 B2
8619788 Sankaran Dec 2013 B1
8705526 Hasan Apr 2014 B1
8706905 McGlaughlin Apr 2014 B1
8717895 Koponen May 2014 B2
8724456 Hong May 2014 B1
8798045 Aybay Aug 2014 B1
8804736 Drake Aug 2014 B1
8806031 Kondur Aug 2014 B1
8826385 Congdon Sep 2014 B2
8918631 Kumar Dec 2014 B1
8937865 Kumar Jan 2015 B1
8965296 Keathley Feb 2015 B2
8995272 Agarwal Mar 2015 B2
9178793 Marlow Nov 2015 B1
9350680 Thayalan May 2016 B2
9438447 Basso Sep 2016 B2
20010005527 Vaeth Jun 2001 A1
20010055274 Hegge Dec 2001 A1
20020019904 Katz Feb 2002 A1
20020021701 Lavian Feb 2002 A1
20020039350 Wang Apr 2002 A1
20020054593 Morohashi May 2002 A1
20020087723 Williams Jul 2002 A1
20020091795 Yip Jul 2002 A1
20030026290 Umayabashi Feb 2003 A1
20030041085 Sato Feb 2003 A1
20030093567 Lolayekar May 2003 A1
20030097464 Martinez May 2003 A1
20030097470 Lapuh May 2003 A1
20030123393 Feuerstraeter Jul 2003 A1
20030147385 Montalvo Aug 2003 A1
20030174706 Shankar Sep 2003 A1
20030189905 Lee Oct 2003 A1
20030189930 Terrell Oct 2003 A1
20030208616 Laing Nov 2003 A1
20030216143 Roese Nov 2003 A1
20030223428 Gonzalez Dec 2003 A1
20030233534 Bernhard Dec 2003 A1
20040001433 Gram Jan 2004 A1
20040003094 See Jan 2004 A1
20040010600 Baldwin Jan 2004 A1
20040049699 Griffith Mar 2004 A1
20040057430 Paavolainen Mar 2004 A1
20040081171 Finn Apr 2004 A1
20040088668 Hamlin May 2004 A1
20040095900 Siegel May 2004 A1
20040117508 Shimizu Jun 2004 A1
20040120326 Yoon Jun 2004 A1
20040156313 Hofmeister et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165595 Holmgren Aug 2004 A1
20040165596 Garcia Aug 2004 A1
20040205234 Barrack Oct 2004 A1
20040213232 Regan Oct 2004 A1
20040225725 Enomoto Nov 2004 A1
20040243673 Goyal Dec 2004 A1
20050007951 Lapuh Jan 2005 A1
20050044199 Shiga Feb 2005 A1
20050074001 Mattes Apr 2005 A1
20050094568 Judd May 2005 A1
20050094630 Valdevit May 2005 A1
20050108375 Hallak-Stamler May 2005 A1
20050122979 Gross Jun 2005 A1
20050152335 Lodha Jul 2005 A1
20050157645 Rabie et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050157751 Rabie Jul 2005 A1
20050169188 Cometto Aug 2005 A1
20050195813 Ambe Sep 2005 A1
20050207423 Herbst Sep 2005 A1
20050213561 Yao Sep 2005 A1
20050220096 Friskney Oct 2005 A1
20050259586 Hafid Nov 2005 A1
20050265356 Kawarai Dec 2005 A1
20050278565 Frattura Dec 2005 A1
20060007869 Hirota Jan 2006 A1
20060018302 Ivaldi Jan 2006 A1
20060023707 Makishima et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029055 Perera Feb 2006 A1
20060034292 Wakayama Feb 2006 A1
20060036648 Frey Feb 2006 A1
20060036765 Weyman Feb 2006 A1
20060059163 Frattura Mar 2006 A1
20060062187 Rune Mar 2006 A1
20060072550 Davis Apr 2006 A1
20060083172 Jordan Apr 2006 A1
20060083254 Ge Apr 2006 A1
20060093254 Mozdy May 2006 A1
20060098589 Kreeger May 2006 A1
20060126511 Youn Jun 2006 A1
20060140130 Kalkunte Jun 2006 A1
20060168109 Warmenhoven Jul 2006 A1
20060184937 Abels Aug 2006 A1
20060209886 Silberman Sep 2006 A1
20060221960 Borgione Oct 2006 A1
20060227776 Chandrasekaran Oct 2006 A1
20060235995 Bhatia Oct 2006 A1
20060242311 Mai Oct 2006 A1
20060242398 Fontijn Oct 2006 A1
20060245439 Sajassi Nov 2006 A1
20060251067 DeSanti Nov 2006 A1
20060256767 Suzuki Nov 2006 A1
20060265515 Shiga Nov 2006 A1
20060285499 Tzeng Dec 2006 A1
20060291388 Amdahl Dec 2006 A1
20060291480 Cho Dec 2006 A1
20060294413 Filz Dec 2006 A1
20070036178 Hares Feb 2007 A1
20070053294 Ho Mar 2007 A1
20070074052 Hemmah Mar 2007 A1
20070081530 Nomura Apr 2007 A1
20070083625 Chamdani Apr 2007 A1
20070086362 Kato Apr 2007 A1
20070094464 Sharma Apr 2007 A1
20070097968 Du May 2007 A1
20070098006 Parry May 2007 A1
20070116224 Burke May 2007 A1
20070116422 Reynolds May 2007 A1
20070130295 Rastogi Jun 2007 A1
20070156659 Lim Jul 2007 A1
20070177525 Wijnands Aug 2007 A1
20070177597 Ju Aug 2007 A1
20070183313 Narayanan Aug 2007 A1
20070206762 Chandra Sep 2007 A1
20070211712 Fitch Sep 2007 A1
20070220059 Lu Sep 2007 A1
20070226214 Smits Sep 2007 A1
20070238343 Velleca Oct 2007 A1
20070258449 Bennett Nov 2007 A1
20070274234 Kubota Nov 2007 A1
20070280223 Pan Dec 2007 A1
20070289017 Copeland, III Dec 2007 A1
20080052487 Akahane Feb 2008 A1
20080056135 Lee Mar 2008 A1
20080057918 Abrant Mar 2008 A1
20080065760 Damm Mar 2008 A1
20080080517 Roy Apr 2008 A1
20080095160 Yadav Apr 2008 A1
20080101386 Gray May 2008 A1
20080112133 Torudbakken May 2008 A1
20080112400 Dunbar et al. May 2008 A1
20080133760 Berkvens Jun 2008 A1
20080159277 Vobbilisetty Jul 2008 A1
20080172492 Raghunath Jul 2008 A1
20080181196 Regan Jul 2008 A1
20080181243 Vobbilisetty Jul 2008 A1
20080186981 Seto Aug 2008 A1
20080205377 Chao Aug 2008 A1
20080219172 Mohan Sep 2008 A1
20080225852 Raszuk Sep 2008 A1
20080225853 Melman Sep 2008 A1
20080228897 Ko Sep 2008 A1
20080240129 Elmeleegy Oct 2008 A1
20080267179 LaVigne Oct 2008 A1
20080285458 Lysne Nov 2008 A1
20080285555 Ogasahara Nov 2008 A1
20080288020 Einav Nov 2008 A1
20080298248 Roeck Dec 2008 A1
20080304498 Jorgensen Dec 2008 A1
20080310342 Kruys Dec 2008 A1
20090022069 Khan Jan 2009 A1
20090024734 Merbach Jan 2009 A1
20090037607 Farinacci Feb 2009 A1
20090042270 Dolly Feb 2009 A1
20090044270 Shelly Feb 2009 A1
20090067422 Poppe Mar 2009 A1
20090067442 Killian Mar 2009 A1
20090079560 Fries Mar 2009 A1
20090080345 Gray Mar 2009 A1
20090083445 Ganga Mar 2009 A1
20090092042 Yuhura Apr 2009 A1
20090092043 Lapuh Apr 2009 A1
20090094354 Rastogi Apr 2009 A1
20090106298 Furusho Apr 2009 A1
20090106405 Mazarick Apr 2009 A1
20090113408 Toeroe Apr 2009 A1
20090116381 Kanda May 2009 A1
20090122700 Aboba May 2009 A1
20090129384 Regan May 2009 A1
20090138577 Casado May 2009 A1
20090138752 Graham May 2009 A1
20090144720 Roush Jun 2009 A1
20090161584 Guan Jun 2009 A1
20090161670 Shepherd Jun 2009 A1
20090168647 Holness Jul 2009 A1
20090199177 Edwards Aug 2009 A1
20090204965 Tanaka Aug 2009 A1
20090213783 Moreton Aug 2009 A1
20090222879 Kostal Sep 2009 A1
20090232031 Vasseur Sep 2009 A1
20090245112 Okazaki Oct 2009 A1
20090245137 Hares Oct 2009 A1
20090245242 Carlson Oct 2009 A1
20090246137 Hadida Oct 2009 A1
20090249444 Macauley Oct 2009 A1
20090252049 Ludwig Oct 2009 A1
20090252061 Small Oct 2009 A1
20090252503 Ishigami Oct 2009 A1
20090260083 Szeto Oct 2009 A1
20090279558 Davis Nov 2009 A1
20090292858 Lambeth Nov 2009 A1
20090316721 Kanda Dec 2009 A1
20090323698 LeFaucheur Dec 2009 A1
20090323708 Ihle Dec 2009 A1
20090327392 Tripathi Dec 2009 A1
20090327462 Adams Dec 2009 A1
20090328392 Tripathi Dec 2009
20100002382 Aybay Jan 2010 A1
20100027420 Smith Feb 2010 A1
20100042869 Szabo Feb 2010 A1
20100046471 Hattori Feb 2010 A1
20100054260 Pandey Mar 2010 A1
20100061269 Banerjee Mar 2010 A1
20100074175 Banks Mar 2010 A1
20100097941 Carlson Apr 2010 A1
20100103813 Allan Apr 2010 A1
20100103939 Carlson Apr 2010 A1
20100114818 Lier May 2010 A1
20100131636 Suri May 2010 A1
20100157844 Casey Jun 2010 A1
20100158024 Sajassi Jun 2010 A1
20100165877 Shukla Jul 2010 A1
20100165995 Mehta Jul 2010 A1
20100168467 Johnston Jul 2010 A1
20100169467 Shukla Jul 2010 A1
20100169948 Budko Jul 2010 A1
20100182920 Matsuoka Jul 2010 A1
20100189119 Sawada Jul 2010 A1
20100195489 Zhou Aug 2010 A1
20100215042 Sato Aug 2010 A1
20100215049 Raza Aug 2010 A1
20100220724 Rabie Sep 2010 A1
20100226368 Mack-Crane Sep 2010 A1
20100226381 Mehta Sep 2010 A1
20100246388 Gupta Sep 2010 A1
20100254703 Kirkpatrick Oct 2010 A1
20100257263 Casado Oct 2010 A1
20100265849 Harel Oct 2010 A1
20100271960 Krygowski Oct 2010 A1
20100272107 Papp Oct 2010 A1
20100281106 Ashwood-Smith Nov 2010 A1
20100284414 Agarwal Nov 2010 A1
20100284418 Gray Nov 2010 A1
20100284698 McColloch Nov 2010 A1
20100287262 Elzur Nov 2010 A1
20100287548 Zhou Nov 2010 A1
20100290464 Assarpour Nov 2010 A1
20100290473 Enduri Nov 2010 A1
20100299527 Arunan Nov 2010 A1
20100303071 Kotalwar Dec 2010 A1
20100303075 Tripathi Dec 2010 A1
20100303083 Belanger Dec 2010 A1
20100309820 Rajagopalan Dec 2010 A1
20100309912 Mehta Dec 2010 A1
20100329110 Rose Dec 2010 A1
20110007738 Berman Jan 2011 A1
20110019678 Mehta Jan 2011 A1
20110032945 Mullooly Feb 2011 A1
20110035489 McDaniel Feb 2011 A1
20110035498 Shah Feb 2011 A1
20110044339 Kotalwar Feb 2011 A1
20110044352 Chaitou Feb 2011 A1
20110051723 Rabie Mar 2011 A1
20110058547 Waldrop Mar 2011 A1
20110064086 Xiong Mar 2011 A1
20110064089 Hidaka Mar 2011 A1
20110072208 Gulati Mar 2011 A1
20110085560 Chawla Apr 2011 A1
20110085563 Kotha Apr 2011 A1
20110088011 Ouali Apr 2011 A1
20110110266 Li May 2011 A1
20110134802 Rajagopalan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110134803 Dalvi Jun 2011 A1
20110134925 Safrai Jun 2011 A1
20110142053 Merwe Jun 2011 A1
20110142062 Wang Jun 2011 A1
20110149526 Turner Jun 2011 A1
20110158113 Nanda Jun 2011 A1
20110161494 McDysan Jun 2011 A1
20110161695 Okita Jun 2011 A1
20110176412 Stine Jul 2011 A1
20110188373 Saito Aug 2011 A1
20110194403 Sajassi Aug 2011 A1
20110194563 Shen Aug 2011 A1
20110228767 Singla Sep 2011 A1
20110228780 Ashwood-Smith Sep 2011 A1
20110231570 Altekar Sep 2011 A1
20110231574 Saunderson Sep 2011 A1
20110235523 Jha Sep 2011 A1
20110243133 Villait Oct 2011 A9
20110243136 Raman Oct 2011 A1
20110246669 Kanada Oct 2011 A1
20110255538 Srinivasan Oct 2011 A1
20110255540 Mizrahi et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110261828 Smith Oct 2011 A1
20110268118 Schlansker Nov 2011 A1
20110268120 Vobbilisetty Nov 2011 A1
20110268125 Vobbilisetty Nov 2011 A1
20110273988 Tourrilhes Nov 2011 A1
20110273990 Rajagopalan Nov 2011 A1
20110274114 Dhar Nov 2011 A1
20110280572 Vobbilisetty Nov 2011 A1
20110286357 Haris Nov 2011 A1
20110286457 Ee Nov 2011 A1
20110286462 Kompella Nov 2011 A1
20110292947 Vobbilisetty Dec 2011 A1
20110296052 Guo Dec 2011 A1
20110299391 Vobbilisetty Dec 2011 A1
20110299413 Chatwani Dec 2011 A1
20110299414 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110299527 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110299528 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110299531 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110299532 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110299533 Yu Dec 2011 A1
20110299534 Koganti Dec 2011 A1
20110299535 Vobbilisetty Dec 2011 A1
20110299536 Cheng Dec 2011 A1
20110317559 Kern Dec 2011 A1
20110317703 Dunbar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120011240 Hara Jan 2012 A1
20120014261 Salam Jan 2012 A1
20120014387 Dunbar Jan 2012 A1
20120020220 Sugita Jan 2012 A1
20120027017 Rai Feb 2012 A1
20120033663 Guichard Feb 2012 A1
20120033665 Da Silva Feb 2012 A1
20120033668 Humphries Feb 2012 A1
20120033669 Mohandas Feb 2012 A1
20120033672 Page Feb 2012 A1
20120042095 Kotha Feb 2012 A1
20120063363 Li Mar 2012 A1
20120075991 Sugita Mar 2012 A1
20120099567 Hart Apr 2012 A1
20120099602 Nagapudi Apr 2012 A1
20120099863 Xu Apr 2012 A1
20120102160 Breh Apr 2012 A1
20120106339 Mishra May 2012 A1
20120117438 Shaffer May 2012 A1
20120131097 Baykal May 2012 A1
20120131289 Taguchi May 2012 A1
20120134266 Roitshtein May 2012 A1
20120136999 Roitshtein May 2012 A1
20120147740 Nakash Jun 2012 A1
20120158997 Hsu Jun 2012 A1
20120163164 Terry Jun 2012 A1
20120170491 Kern Jul 2012 A1
20120177039 Berman Jul 2012 A1
20120210416 Mihelich Aug 2012 A1
20120221636 Surtani Aug 2012 A1
20120230225 Matthews Sep 2012 A1
20120239918 Huang Sep 2012 A1
20120243539 Keesara Sep 2012 A1
20120250502 Brolin Oct 2012 A1
20120260079 Mruthyunjaya Oct 2012 A1
20120275297 Subramanian Nov 2012 A1
20120275347 Banerjee Nov 2012 A1
20120278804 Narayanasamy Nov 2012 A1
20120287785 Kamble Nov 2012 A1
20120294192 Masood Nov 2012 A1
20120294194 Balasubramanian Nov 2012 A1
20120320800 Kamble Dec 2012 A1
20120320926 Kamath et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120327766 Tsai Dec 2012 A1
20120327937 Melman et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130003535 Sarwar Jan 2013 A1
20130003549 Matthews Jan 2013 A1
20130003737 Sinicrope Jan 2013 A1
20130003738 Koganti et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130028072 Addanki Jan 2013 A1
20130034015 Jaiswal Feb 2013 A1
20130034021 Jaiswal Feb 2013 A1
20130066947 Ahmad Mar 2013 A1
20130067466 Combs Mar 2013 A1
20130070762 Adams Mar 2013 A1
20130083693 Himura Apr 2013 A1
20130097345 Munoz Apr 2013 A1
20130114595 Mack-Crane May 2013 A1
20130124707 Ananthapadmanabha May 2013 A1
20130127848 Joshi May 2013 A1
20130132296 Koppenhagen May 2013 A1
20130135811 Dunwoody May 2013 A1
20130136123 Ge May 2013 A1
20130148546 Eisenhauer Jun 2013 A1
20130156425 Kirkpatrick Jun 2013 A1
20130194914 Agarwal Aug 2013 A1
20130219473 Schaefer Aug 2013 A1
20130223221 Xu Aug 2013 A1
20130223449 Koganti Aug 2013 A1
20130250951 Koganti Sep 2013 A1
20130259037 Natarajan Oct 2013 A1
20130266015 Qu Oct 2013 A1
20130268590 Mahadevan Oct 2013 A1
20130272135 Leong Oct 2013 A1
20130294451 Li Nov 2013 A1
20130297757 Han Nov 2013 A1
20130301425 Udutha Nov 2013 A1
20130301642 Radhakrishnan Nov 2013 A1
20130308492 Baphna Nov 2013 A1
20130308647 Rosset Nov 2013 A1
20130315586 Kipp Nov 2013 A1
20130322427 Stiekes Dec 2013 A1
20130332660 Talagala Dec 2013 A1
20130336104 Talla Dec 2013 A1
20130346583 Low Dec 2013 A1
20140013324 Zhang Jan 2014 A1
20140019608 Kawakami Jan 2014 A1
20140025736 Wang Jan 2014 A1
20140044126 Sabhanatarajan Feb 2014 A1
20140050223 Foo Feb 2014 A1
20140056298 Vobbilisetty Feb 2014 A1
20140059225 Gasparakis Feb 2014 A1
20140064056 Sakata Mar 2014 A1
20140071987 Janardhanan Mar 2014 A1
20140086253 Yong Mar 2014 A1
20140105034 Sun Apr 2014 A1
20140157251 Hocker Jun 2014 A1
20140258446 Bursell Sep 2014 A1
20140269733 Venkatesh Sep 2014 A1
20140298091 Carlen Oct 2014 A1
20140355477 Velayudhan et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150010007 Matsuhira Jan 2015 A1
20150030031 Zhou Jan 2015 A1
20150127618 Alberti May 2015 A1
20150143369 Zheng May 2015 A1
20150172098 Agarwal Jun 2015 A1
20150195093 Mahadevan et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150222506 Kizhakkiniyil Aug 2015 A1
20150248298 Gavrilov Sep 2015 A1
20150263991 MacChiano Sep 2015 A1
20150281066 Koley Oct 2015 A1
20150301901 Rath Oct 2015 A1
20150347468 Bester Dec 2015 A1
20160072899 Tung Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
102801599 Nov 2012 CN
0579567 May 1993 EP
0579567 Jan 1994 EP
0993156 Dec 2000 EP
1398920 Mar 2004 EP
1916807 Apr 2008 EP
2001167 Dec 2008 EP
2874359 May 2015 EP
2008056838 May 2008 WO
2009042919 Apr 2009 WO
2010111142 Sep 2010 WO
2011140028 Nov 2011 WO
2014031781 Feb 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (232)
Entry
“Switched Virtual Internetworking moves beyond bridges and routers”, Sep. 23, 1994, No. 12, New York, US.
Knight, S. et al. “Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol”, Apr. 1998, XP-002135272.
Eastlake, Donald et al., “RBridges: TRILL Header Options”, Dec. 2009.
Touch, J. et al., “Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement”, May 2009.
Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridge VLAN Mapping”, Dec. 2009.
“Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) 6.2 Virtual Fabrics Feature Frequently Asked Questions”.
Perlman, Radia “Challenges and Opportunities in the Design of TRILL: a Routed layer 2 Technology”, XP-002649647, 2009.
Nadas, S. et al., “Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6”, Mar. 2010.
Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridges: Base Protocol Specification”, Mar. 2010.
Christensen, M. et al., “Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Snooping Switches”, May 2006.
“Switched Virtual Internetworking moved beyond bridges and routers”, 8178 Data Communications Sep. 23, 1994, No. 12, New York.
S. Night et al., “Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol”, Network Working Group, XP-002135272, Apr. 1998.
Eastlake 3rd., Donald et al., “RBridges: TRILL Header Options”, Draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-options-00.txt, Dec. 24, 2009.
J. Touch, et al., “Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement”, May 2009.
Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridge VLAN Mapping”, Draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-vlan-mapping-01.txt, Dec. 4, 2009.
Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) 6.2 Virtual Fabrics Feature Frequently Asked Questions.
Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridges: Base Protocol Specification”, draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-protocol-16.txt, Mar. 3, 2010.
Lapuh, Roger et al., “Split Multi-link Trunking (SMLT)”, Oct. 2002.
Lapuh, Roger et al., “Split Multi-link Trunking (SMLT) draft-lapuh-network-smlt-08”, 2008.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,843, filed Jun. 26, 2012, dated Oct. 21, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011, dated Nov. 12, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Nov. 29, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011, dated Dec. 2, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Mar. 14, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011, dated Jan. 16, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jan. 10, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jan. 6, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012, dated Feb. 20, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Mar. 26, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Apr. 9, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011, dated Mar. 27, 2014.
Louati, Wajdi et al., “Network-Based Virtual Personal Overlay Networks Using Programmable Virtual Routers”, 2005.
Knight, Paul et al., “Network based IP VPN Architecture using Virtual Routers”, May 2003.
Kreeger, L. et al. “Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00”, Aug. 2, 2012.
An Introduction to Brocade VCS Fabric Technology, Dec. 3, 2012.
Knight, Paul et al. “Layer 2 and 3 Virtual Private Networks: Taxonomy, Technology, and Standardization Efforts”, 2004.
Narten, T. et al. “Problem Statement: Overlays for Network Virtualization draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01”, Oct. 31, 2011.
The Effortless Network: HyperEdge Technology for the Campus LAN, 2012.
Fastlron and Turbulron 24x Configuration Guide, 2010.
Fastlron Configuration Guide, Supporting IronWare Software Release 07.0.00, 2009.
Foundary Fastlron Configuration Guide, Software Release FSX 04.2.00b, Software Release FWS 04.3.00, Software Release FGS 05.0.00a, 2008.
Brocade Unveils “The Effortless Network”, 2009.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249, filed Mar. 16, 2010, dated Sep. 12, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249, filed Mar. 16, 2010, dated Apr. 26, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011, dated May 22, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011, dated Dec. 21, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011, dated Jul. 9, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Feb. 5, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jul. 16, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jun. 10, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011, dated Mar. 18, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jun. 21, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011, dated Jul. 31, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jan. 28, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jul. 3, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Feb. 5, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jul. 18, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010, dated Dec. 20, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010, dated May 24, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Mar. 4, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Sep. 5, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968, filed Nov. 19, 2010, dated Jun. 7, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968, filed Nov. 19, 2010, dated Jan. 4, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,864, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Sep. 19, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,360, filed Apr. 29, 2011, dated May 31, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Oct. 2, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No., 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011, dated Dec. 3, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011, dated Jun. 11, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,688, filed Feb. 18, 2011, dated Apr. 25, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Jun. 11, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Feb. 22, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011, dated Oct. 26, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011, dated May 16, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No., 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011, dated Jan. 28, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed May 22, 2013, dated May 22, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jun. 19, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,808, filed Feb. 3, 2012, dated Jul. 18, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011, dated Jun. 13, 2013.
Zhai F. Hu et al. “RBridge: Pseudo-Nickname; draft-hu-trill-pseudonode-nickname-02.txt”, May 15, 2012.
Huang, Nen-Fu et al., “An Effective Spanning Tree Algorithm for a Bridged LAN”, Mar. 16, 1992.
Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,357, filed Nov. 5, 2012.
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012.
Office Action dated May 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,843, filed Jun. 26, 2012.
Office Action dated May 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/484,072, filed May 30, 2012.
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012.
Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,861, filed Apr. 5, 2012.
Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, filed Mar. 20, 2012.
Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Lapuh, Roger et al., ‘Split Multi-link Trunking (SMLT) draft-lapuh-network-smlt-08’, Jan. 2009.
‘An Introduction to Brocade VCS Fabric Technology’, BROCADE white paper, http://community.brocade.com/docs/DOC-2954, Dec. 3, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806 Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2012.
Office action dated Jan. 10, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jan. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011.
Office action dated Jul. 31, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011.
Office action dated Jan. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Oct. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
Office action dated Dec. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
Office action dated Nov. 29, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Nov. 12, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011.
BROCADE Brocade Unveils The Effortless Network, http://newsroom.brocade.com/press-releases/brocade-unveils-the-effortless-network-nasdaq-brcd-0859535, 2012.
Kreeger, L. et al., ‘Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00’, Jan. 30, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,993, filed Feb. 3, 2012, dated Jul. 23, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,808, filed Jul. 18, 2013, dated Jul. 18, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,887 dated Jan. 6, 2014.
Office action dated Apr. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249, filed Mar. 16, 2010.
Office action dated Sep. 12, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249, filed Mar. 16, 2010.
Office action dated Dec. 21, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
Office action dated Mar. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
Office action dated Jul. 9, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
Office action dated May 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011.
Office action dated Dec. 5, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011.
Office action dated Apr. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Feb. 5, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jun. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Mar. 18, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011.
Office action dated Mar. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jun. 21, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jan. 28, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Mar. 26, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jul. 3, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jul. 18, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Dec. 20, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
Office action dated May 24, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
Office action dated Sep. 5, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Mar. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jan. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
Office action dated Jun. 7, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
Office action dated Sep. 19, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,864, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated May 31, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,360, filed Apr. 29, 2011.
Office action dated Dec. 3, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
Office action dated Apr. 22, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
Office action dated Jun. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
Office action dated Apr. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,688, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
Office action dated Feb. 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
Office action dated Jun. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
Office action dated Oct. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011.
Office action dated May 16, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011.
Office action dated Aug. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011.
Office action dated Jan. 28, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
Office action dated May 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
Office action dated Jun. 19, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jul. 18, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,808, filed Feb. 3, 2012.
Office action dated Jun. 13, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,688, filed Feb. 18, 2011, dated Jul. 17, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Jul. 7, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Apr. 9, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jul. 25, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jun. 20, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011, dated Aug. 7, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012, dated Jul. 24, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, filed Mar. 20, 2012, dated Mar. 6, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,061, filed Jul. 23, 2012, dated Jun. 6, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,207 dated Jul. 24, 2014, filed Jan. 15, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010, dated Dec. 2, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011, dated Dec. 5, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012, dated Feb. 28, 2014.
Perlman R: ‘Challenges and opportunities in the design of TRILL: a routed layer 2 technology’, 2009 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops, Honolulu, HI, USA, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Nov. 30, 2009, pp. 1-6, XP002649647, DOI: 10.1109/GLOBECOM.2009.5360776 ISBN: 1-4244-5626-0 [retrieved on Jul. 19, 2011].
TRILL Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Proposed Standard RBridges: Base Protocol Specificaiton Mar. 3, 2010.
Office action dated Aug. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office action dated Jul. 7, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Nov. 7, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Nov. 10, 2014.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,942, filed Jun. 10, 2011.
Mckeown, Nick et al. “OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks”, Mar. 14, 2008, www.openflow.org/documents/openflow-wp-latest.pdf.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, dated Mar. 9, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011, dated Jan. 5, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012, dated Jan. 5, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,357, filed Nov. 5, 2012, dated Jan. 30, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,026, filed Mar. 26, 2013, dated Jan. 30, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,328, filed Mar. 5, 2013, dated Mar. 13, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Mar. 13, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Feb. 27, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011, dated Feb. 23, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Jan. 29, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011, dated Jan. 26, 2015.
Office action dated Oct. 2, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Kompella, Ed K. et al., ‘Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling’ Jan. 2007.
Rosen, E. et al., “BGP/MPLS VPNs”, Mar. 1999.
Abawajy J. “An Approach to Support a Single Service Provider Address Image for Wide Area Networks Environment” Centre for Parallel and Distributed Computing, School of Computer Science Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, filed Mar. 20, 2012, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/577,785, filed Dec. 19, 2014, dated Apr. 13, 2015.
Mahalingam “VXLAN: A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks” Oct. 17, 2013 pp. 1-22, Sections 1, 4 and 4.1.
Office action dated Apr. 30, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012.
Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
Office Action dated May 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,822, filed Nov. 3, 2011.
Siamak Azodolmolky et al. “Cloud computing networking: Challenges and opportunities for innovations”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, No. 7, Jul. 1, 2013.
Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
Office action dated Jun. 8, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,042, filed Feb. 11, 2014.
Office Action Dated Jun. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/890,150, filed May 8, 2013.
Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,817, filed Mar. 15, 2011.
Touch, J. et al., ‘Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement’, May 2009, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17.
Zhai F. Hu et al. ‘RBridge: Pseudo-Nickname; draft-hu-trill-pseudonode-nickname-02.txt’, May 15, 2012.
Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2014.
Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/473,941, filed Aug. 29, 2014.
Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/488,173, filed Sep. 16, 2014.
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,217, filed Feb. 25, 2013.
Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,374, filed Jan. 15, 2014.
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/151,693, filed Jan. 9, 2014.
Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/577,785, filed Dec. 19, 2014.
Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,042, filed Feb. 11, 2014.
Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/215,996, filed Mar. 17, 2014.
Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,566, filed Jan. 6, 2012.
Open Flow Switch Specification Version 1.1.0, Feb. 28, 2011.
Open Flow Switch Specification Version 1.0.0, Dec. 31, 2009.
Open Flow Configuration and Management Protocol 1.0 (OF-Config 1.0) Dec. 23, 2011.
Open Flow Switch Specification Version 1.2 Dec. 5, 2011.
Office action dated Feb. 2, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016. U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,106, filed Jan. 13, 2014.
Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/557,105, filed Jul. 24, 2012.
Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/488,173, filed Sep. 16, 2014.
Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,397, filed Aug. 20, 2013.
Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,508, filed Feb. 12, 2010.
Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/618,941, filed Feb. 10, 2015.
Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,913, filed Oct. 9, 2014.
Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/473,941, filed Aug. 29, 2014.
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/284,212, filed May 21, 2016.
Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/216,292, filed Mar. 17, 2014.
Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,328, filed Mar. 5, 2013.
Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 14/512,268, filed Oct. 10, 2014.
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/899,849, filed May 22, 2013.
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012.
Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016, U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,357, filed Nov. 5, 2012.
Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/473,941, filed Aug. 29, 2014.
Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/822,380, filed Aug. 10, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130114600 A1 May 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61557268 Nov 2011 US