This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of the filing date of non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 14/183,893 filed Feb. 19, 2014, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of the filing date of Norwegian patent application No. NO 20130289 filed Feb. 22, 2013 and Norwegian patent application No. NO 20131423 filed Oct. 28, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to a fingerprint sensor for integration in smart phones or similar device.
Finger print sensors comprising electrodes for measuring characteristics in a finger surface are well known, e.g. EP0988614, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,963,679 and 6,069,970 describe sensors based on different impedance or capacitance measurement principles with stripe shaped or matrix sensors comprising a number of individual sensor elements.
The sensor surfaces of current fingerprint sensors are in general not suitable for having extensive direct contact with the environment, and usually have to be provided with a housing protecting the circuits from humidity, wear, corrosion, chemical substances, electronic noise, mechanical influences, sun light electric discharges etc. U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,248 provides a possible solution to this problem, in which the circuit is enclosed in such a way that the finger is allowed to direct contact with the sensitive surface of the sensor through an opening in the top of the enclosure.
In many cases, this solution will not be sufficient to provide the required reliability. The materials (semiconductors, metal, dielectrics) being used on the surface of the integrated circuits are usually not sufficiently reliable to withstand exposure from the outer environment and contact with the finger over a longer period of time, and thus this solution will also lead to reliability problems. Another solution may be adding additional layers of metal and dielectrics on the chip surface, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,069,970. Adding thick dielectric layers, however, generally results in a degradation of the measurement signal and, hence, the performance of the fingerprint sensor. Such layers also tend to increase the production costs and create compatibility problems with the semiconductor process in general (related to processing temperature, varying dimensions due to temperature differences etc.). Yet another solution is described in EP1303828 routing the conductors through a substrate to the processor then being positioned safely on the other side of the substrate, inside the device.
Touch screen driven devices, such smart phones and tablet style personal computer devices, typically have a front surface where the display area is approaching 100% utilization and has very limited space available for physical buttons or other user interaction devices outside the display area. US 2013/0181949 A1 discloses one possible implementation of a transparent fingerprint sensor overlaying the touch screen of a smart phone. U.S. Pat. No. 8,564,314 disclose another possible implementation of a fingerprint sensor integrated with a capacitive touch position sensor where the sensor is positioned under glass. However, the patent does not discuss or propose any solutions to overcome the severe degradation of the sensor performance caused by the thick protective cover glass.
A fingerprint sensor integrated in the glass of a touch screen device, such as mobile phone or a tablet style personal computer, especially for sensing through the front glass or protective covering of the touch screen device allows for a cost effective solution that protects the fingerprint sensor against the external environment, and a multiplicity of different design and ergonomics key design criteria for different handset manufacturers.
These objectives are obtained by providing a fingerprint sensor especially for integration in a device having an overlay made of an insulating material where the fingerprint sensor comprising a plurality of sensing elements positioned on a first side of the overlay,
a plurality of probes positioned in a predetermined pattern defining a fingerprint sensing area on a second side of the overlay, the plurality of probes extending from the first side of the overlay at least partially through the overlay, and a plurality of conductor leads on the first side of the overlay interconnecting the plurality of probes with the plurality of sensing elements.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a fingerprint sensor system especially for integration in a device having an overlay made of an insulating material, where the fingerprint sensor system comprising a plurality of sensing elements positioned on a first side of the overlay, a plurality of probes positioned in a predetermined pattern defining a fingerprint sensing area on a second side of the overlay, the plurality of probes extending from the first side of the overlay at least partially through the overlay, a plurality of conductor leads on the first side of the overlay interconnecting the plurality of probes with the plurality of sensing elements,
a plurality of amplifiers connected to the plurality of sensing elements, the number of amplifiers preferably being less than the number of sensing element, and an activation circuit connected to the plurality of sensing elements, the activation circuit being adapted to output at least one activation signal.
Yet further objects of the present invention are obtained as claimed by the attached claim set.
The present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, illustrating the invention by way of example only.
The predetermined pattern defining the sensing area as shown in
An exemplary manufacture process of a fingerprint sensor as described herein takes advantage of commercially available cover materials and micro-machining processes. First, holes and/or blind holes are made in the substrate material to define the position and depth of the probes by methods known by the person skilled in the art such as laser drilling, mechanical drilling, ion drilling, ion etching etc. Secondly, the holes and surfaces are filled and/or covered by a conductive material by methods know by the person skilled in the art such as deposition, ion-exchange metallization etc. Thirdly, the electrodes and conductor leads might be processed partially on the front and/or back side of the substrate with standard lithography and etching processes as know by the person skilled in the art.
Now returning to
The conductor leads 22 in one exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprise at least one conductive layer processed directly on the overlay 20 by applying and patterning the at least one layer of conductive material by methods known by the person skilled in art. The conductor leads might be used as a redistribution layer to fan out a typically very narrow pitch of the probes 21, 21′ to ease the interconnect to a subsequent signal processing unit. In this way the redistribution layer also decouples the size of the subsequent signal processing unit from the size of the sensing area. Alternatively, the conductor leads 22 might be supplied with, e.g., BGA balls to interconnect to the subsequent signal processing unit. In yet another embodiment as described in further detail below with reference to
In yet another exemplary embodiment the sensing element 40 is provided with a fourth conductive layer (not shown) positioned between the second and the third conductive layers. The fourth conductive layer will act as a shield layer between activation line 46 and pick-up electrodes 44.
In
The sensing element might also comprise a third conductor, or activation line, 56 defined in a third conductive layer positioned under the activation electrode 53 on the opposite side of a second dielectric layer 55. The activation line 56 is electrically connected to the activation electrode 53 either capacitively over the dielectric layer 55 or galvanically through a conductive via 57. It should be noted that the activation electrode 53 and pick-up electrode 54 might switch functionality based on a specific implementation. In yet another exemplary embodiment the sensing element 50 is provided with a fourth conductive layer (not shown) positioned between the second and the third conductive layer. The fourth conductive layer will act as a shield layer between activation line 56 and pick-up electrodes 54.
An exemplary measurement principle according to the present invention is illustrated in
The description above with reference to
The unit may also include optional silicon dies and circuitry 24 (see
As illustrated in
Thus is possible to integrate a fingerprint sensor in the shell of a touch-screen device, such as a mobile phone or tablet style personal computer, while taking into account design and ergonomics considerations that are key design criteria for handset manufacturers. This will provide additional advantages such as:
Design
Ergonomics and usability
Simplified integration and enhanced durability
User feedback for increased biometric performance
Direct interaction with application graphics and animations
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20130289 | Feb 2013 | NO | national |
20131423 | Oct 2013 | NO | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4016490 | Weckenmann et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4290052 | Eichelberger et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4353056 | Tsikos | Oct 1982 | A |
5325442 | Knapp | Jun 1994 | A |
5371404 | Juskey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5399898 | Rostoker | Mar 1995 | A |
5509083 | Abtahi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5844287 | Hassan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861875 | Gerpheide | Jan 1999 | A |
5862248 | Salatino et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5953441 | Setlak | Sep 1999 | A |
5963679 | Setlak | Oct 1999 | A |
6016355 | Dickinson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020749 | Morris et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025726 | Gershenfeld et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026564 | Wang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6069970 | Salatino et al. | May 2000 | A |
6289114 | Mainguet | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327376 | Harkin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6459424 | Resman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483931 | Kalnitsky et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6512381 | Kramer | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522773 | Houdeau | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525547 | Hayes | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6636053 | Gozzini | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6714666 | Morimura et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6737329 | Lepert et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6765274 | Honda | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6785407 | Tschudi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6862942 | Kawahata | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6927581 | Gozzini | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6987871 | Kalnitsky et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7053633 | Hara | May 2006 | B2 |
7081765 | Miyasaka et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084642 | Gozzini | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7088114 | Gozzini | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110577 | Tschudi | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7251351 | Mathiassen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7298875 | Kim et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7339381 | Van Berkel | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7522753 | Kalnitsky et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7705613 | Misra et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7738681 | Rannow | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7848550 | Mathiassen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7940249 | Perreault | May 2011 | B2 |
8358815 | Benkley | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8421890 | Benkley, III | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8487624 | Bredholt | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8564314 | Shaikh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8860683 | Baumbach | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9135495 | Pope et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9153490 | Mitushashi et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9177191 | Benkley | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20030161511 | Vermesan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050101054 | Mastromatteo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050156906 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060056663 | Call | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119369 | Kawahata et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080002867 | Mathiassen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100176271 | Rim et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110019373 | Ryhänen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110102569 | Erhart | May 2011 | A1 |
20110182488 | Bredholt et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192657 | Chen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110267298 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120134549 | Benkley, III | May 2012 | A1 |
20120242635 | Erhart et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120267740 | Okamoto | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270648 | Rasmussen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130181949 | Setlak | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194071 | Sløgedal et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130279769 | Benkley, III et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140241595 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140361395 | Bhagavat et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150036065 | Yousefpor et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150119654 | Martin et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013100571 | Apr 2013 | AU |
0919947 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0902387 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0988614 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1328919 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1775674 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1303828 | Jan 2008 | EP |
63-310087 | Dec 1988 | JP |
04104377 | Apr 1992 | JP |
6-288852 | Oct 1994 | JP |
8-235361 | Sep 1996 | JP |
10-91769 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11-19070 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-164824 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-318864 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2001-141411 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-208509 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-1339057 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-502520 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2005156291 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2012-083829 | Apr 2012 | JP |
20080035133 | Apr 2008 | KR |
201229852 | Jul 2012 | TW |
201346779 | Nov 2013 | TW |
WO 9425938 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9852157 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9858342 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 0199035 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0199035 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0199036 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03049012 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004098083 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2011080262 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2013058464 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2014128249 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014128260 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Third Party Submission filed in U.S. Appl. No. 14/451,076, 22 pages (Jul. 31, 2015). |
Ratha, N., Bolle, R., “Automatic Fingerprint Recognition Systems,” Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., ISBN 0-387-95593-3, New York, NY, 31 pages (2004). |
International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/053427, 4 pages (dated Jun. 23, 2014). |
International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP20014/053403, 3 pages (dated Jun. 25, 2014). |
Search Report issued in Norwegian Patent Application No. 20130289, 2 pages (dated Sep. 19, 2013). |
Third Party Submission as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 14/294,903, 15 pages (Jun. 10, 2015). |
Third Party Submission as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 14/294,903, 19 pages (Jun. 10, 2015). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/016576, 11 pages (dated Jun. 12, 2015). |
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Rejection with English Translation of Japanese Application No. 2002-503803, 17 pages (dated Jul. 15, 2010). |
International Search Report for PCT/NO01/00238, 4 pages (dated Jan. 9, 2002). |
Balde et al., “Overview of Multichip Technology,” Electronic Materials Handbook, ASM International, vol. 1, pp. 144-145, 297-305, 320-321, 438-442 (ISNBN 0-87170-285-1) (no date provided). |
Baumgartner et al., “Advanced Multichip Module Technologies,” Proceedings of the 9th European Hybrid Microelectronics Conference, ISHM, International Society for Hybrid Microelectronic, pp. 200-207 (Jun. 1993). |
Drueke, “A Sealing Process for Printed-Through-Holes,” Proceedings of the 9th European Hybrid Microelectronics Conference, ISHM, International Society for Hybrid Microelectronics, pp. 115-122 (Jun. 1993). |
Non-final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,893, 33 pages (dated Jan. 13, 2016). |
Notice of Allowance Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,893, 23 pages (dated Jul. 13, 2016). |
Non-final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/768,654, 40 pages (dated May 19, 2017). |
Non-final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/355,415, 43 pages (dated Dec. 30, 2016). |
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/768,654, 26 pages (dated Dec. 8, 2017). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170068836 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14183893 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15355415 | US |