Patent Grant
6976362
Syngas generators, such as reformers and gasifiers of hydrocarbon fluids and solid carbonaceous materials, and Fischer Tropsch (FT) units, primarily for creating liquid hydrocarbons from syngas, are combined to create an integrated plant for providing one or more of urea, ammonia, carbon dioxide, electric power, and even sulfur when dealing with sulfur-containing raw material.
Our modern civilization cannot be sustained without burning carbonaceous materials for primarily motive and electrical power within the foreseeable future. The carbon dioxide (CO2) generated by such burning may be contributing to the gradual increase of the planet's temperature since 1900. This is occurring because CO2 permits the sun's energy to pass through the atmosphere but traps the longer wavelength energy radiated by the earth into the atmosphere.
The integrated plants and processes of this invention can help reduce the amount of CO2 currently vented into the air as a by-product of synthesizing the various products later discussed in the description of the manufacturing plant flow diagrams. Consequently, the reduction of CO2, which is a greenhouse gas, through the sequestration processes detailed herein, reduces the amount of greenhouse gases vented into the atmosphere. Further, the plants of this invention produce substantial energy savings by balancing exothermic and endothermic reactors as discussed below.
A variety of syngas generators are known, e.g., reformers, autothermal reactors, and gasifiers. Thus, U.S. Pat. No. 5,611,947 to J. S. Vavruska, U.S. Pat. No. 5,993,761 to Piotr and Albin Czernichowski and U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,852 to A. F. Blutke et al. all teach plasma reformers useful in constructing the integrated facilities used in the process of this invention. Likewise, Charles B. Benham et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,621,155, utilize reformers to provide feedstreams to Fischer Tropsch reactors utilizing iron-based catalysts. U.S. Pat. No. 6,306,917 to Mark S. Bohn et al. teaches that hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, and electric power can be manufactured at a plant using the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reactors. It also suggests that urea can be produced from the carbon dioxide but no suggestion is given as to what facilities or processes are needed to manufacture the urea or the economic practicality of such a course.
The mentioned references deal with economic niches where tax incentives, regulatory penalties and other incentives must combine with other factors to make the processes commercial. A continuing increase in world temperatures or a firmer tie-in between the CO2 in the atmosphere and increasing world climate temperatures could quickly result in such incentives. The plants can be of particular utility when sited at remote locations where there is a large surplus of natural gas, petroleum, coal or other carbonaceous materials which are presently unrecoverable because of transportation costs, etc.
Increasing regulatory demands have limited, and, in some instances extinguished, the petroleum producers' and refiners' ability to flare waste gases. Further, there are often limitations on the amounts and kinds of other wastes that can be disposed of locally without harm to the environment, e.g., at an offshore crude oil producing platform. The multi-product plants of this invention provide a mechanism for packaging the various unit processes required for the utilization of this invention in a manner that the resulting plants can be utilized to supply electricity for a platform, eliminate the need for flares, convert the waste gases and liquids normally flared into liquid hydrocarbons, ammonia and/or urea while substantially eliminating local CO2 emissions. Solid commercial products can also be produced for agriculture, e.g., sulfur and urea prills. Such self-contained plants provide trade-offs; for offshore petroleum and/or natural gas platforms, which can improve their economic life span. This is particularly true where the deposits being recovered are sour or include some CO2 production.
The unit processes of this invention are each individually well known and the economics of the processes have been commercially proven. However, the joining of these unit processes as taught herein provides a utility for environmental and other purposes that has heretofore been unforeseen.
Ammonia, carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons, electric power and urea are producible from the reaction of hydrogen, nitrogen, water, and a source of oxygenated carbon. The process begins with oxygen, water and coal being formed into syngas (H2/CO) in a syngas generator. The syngas is utilized in a FT reactor to produce hydrocarbons and hydrogen by general the reaction:
3H2+CO→CH4+H2 (1).
The hydrogen from this reaction is reacted with nitrogen from an air separation oxygen plant to form ammonia, NH3:
3H2+N2→2NH3 (2).
The ammonia can then be reacted with carbon dioxide, CO2, to make urea, H2NCONH2, (reaction 3). The CO2 for this reaction is formed by the well known water-gas shift reaction (4).
2NH3+CO2→H2NCONH2+H2O (3).
CO+H2O→CO2+H2 (4).
Electric power can be produced by combustion of hydrogen, formed in reactions 1 and 4, in a gas turbine used to drive an electricity generator and/or utilizing steam produced from syngas heat recovery to drive a steam turbine which, in turn, drives an electricity generator. Furthermore, electric power can be produced without producing urea. Sulfur and various heavy metals can be recovered when sulfur or metal-containing carbon sources are utilized.
In the coal gasification/FT/power plant of
To the extent needed, the gaseous treated stream, or desulfurized syngas, 220, from the SRU 20 is then piped to the FT reactor 21. Wax 240 is removed from the FT reactor 21 as a liquid for use as a product or for production of diesel fuel in a hydrocracking unit (not shown). The overhead gases 260 from FT reactor 21 are cooled in heat exchanger 22 whereby condensing water 270 and hydrocarbons 280 are removed in separator vessel 23. Tail gas 300 from the product separator 23 is piped to a water gas shift reactor 24. Steam 320 is added to the shift reactor 24 to react with the carbon monoxide in the tail gas 300 to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide, 340. The shift reactor 24 preferably uses a high temperature iron/chrome shift catalyst. The output 340 of the shift reactor 24 is passed through CO2 removal unit 25 which removes CO2 preferably in an amine solution. The CO2 is removed from the solution in CO2 stripper 26 and compressed in compressor 27 for sequestration or use. Combustible components 360 from the CO2 removal unit 25, comprised primarily of hydrogen, are fed to a combustor 28 and burned with air 380 to produce combustion products 400 comprised primarily of water vapor and nitrogen. The combustion products 400 are fed to the gas turbine 29 which is used to drive a coupled electricity generator 30 for power generation. The hot exhaust gases 420 from gas turbine 29 are cooled in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) 31 and burned in a flare (not shown). The HRSG unit 31 generates high pressure superheated steam 440 which powers steam turbine 32 also coupled to electricity generator 30. Exhaust steam 460 from steam turbine 32 is condensed in water-cooled condenser 33, and the water 480 is recycled (not shown) using pump 34. Fueling the gas turbine 29 with primarily hydrogen greatly reduces the amount of CO2 produced in the stack gases.
In one embodiment of the invention, the syngas 220 leaving sulfur removal unit 20 is divided into two streams. One gas stream goes to the FT unit 21 while the other stream 35 bypasses the FT and hydrocarbon recovery units 21, 22, and 23 and combines with the FT tail gases 300 fed to the shift reactor 24. Using this embodiment, plant output can be adjusted to optimize the split between FT products and electrical power production.
Example 1 is a computer simulation based on the flow sheet of FIG. 1.
5500 tpd Pittsburgh #8 coal is gasified with 3091 tpd water and 4806 tpd oxygen. The coal is 74.16% by weight carbon. After quenching and cleaning, 47.2% of the syngas is sent to a FT reactor using an iron-based catalyst to produce 6000 barrels per day of C5+ hydrocarbon products and tail gases. After separating the FT hydrocarbon products from the FT tail gases, the tail gases and the other 52.8% of the syngas are mixed with 233 MMSCFD of steam and sent to a low-temperature shift reactor. The gases leaving the shift reactor having achieved equilibrium conditions at 250° C. are comprised on a volume basis of approximately 38.0% H2, 37.5% CO2, 23.0% H2O, and less than 1% of CO, CH4 and N2. After removing 11,300 tpd of CO2 for sequestration and condensing the water from the tail gases, the remaining stream of predominantly H2 is used as fuel in the combustion turbine to produce approximately 349 Mwe of power from a combined cycle unit. Only 3.5% by weight of the carbon in the coal fed to the gasifier is present in the combustion turbine flue gases emitted into the atmosphere and contributing the greenhouse effect.
The flow sheet takes advantage of the water-gas shift activity of an iron-based FT catalyst in converting much of the carbon in the feed coal to CO2. This catalyst is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,504,118 issued to Charles B. Benham et al. A computer simulation utilizing the equipment of this flow sheet of 5500 ton per day of coal produces 6000 barrels per day of FT liquids, 400 MW net electrical power, and 10515 ton per day of sequesterable CO2. Only 9% of the feed carbon is in the stack gas.
Simulation of the coal gasifier was based on synthesis gas composition given in “Table 1. Syngas Production from Various Carbonaceous Feedstocks”, Texaco Gasification Process for Solid Feedstocks, Texaco Development Corporation, 1993. Simulation of the Fischer-Tropsch reactor was based on Rentech's iron-based catalyst (U.S. Pat. No. 5,504,118).
The obvious benefits of utilizing the unit operations and processes of this invention include:
With respect to
Feedstocks include coal and low value industrial materials, e.g., petroleum coke and refinery bottoms having a hydrogen to carbon ratio of about 1. Feedstocks can, however, have higher ratios, e.g., natural gas with a ratio approaching 4:1. Many of these materials will include contaminants which must be removed, e.g., sulfur, arsenic and silicaceous materials which are removed during the course of the syngas manufacturing steps as slag or sulfur compounds.
The syngas produced can be contaminated with unwanted impurities such as chlorine and other toxic materials which must be safely removed and stored.
For the purposes of this invention, iron-based FT catalysts are preferred because they produce CO2 and H2 via their water gas shift activity. In general, the reactors, materials of construction and processes are well known to those skilled in the refining and Fischer Tropsch utilizing industries. The assemblage of the reactors taught form the basis of the claimed chemical processing units sequenced in the invention. The sequenced chemical processes, catalysts, temperatures, concentrations and other stated parameters form the basis of the chemical process claims. It is to be understood that the order of the chemical processing units and the process steps and conditions described in Figures and the discussion thereof can be varied and the variations are intended to fall within the claims as taught in the description and Figures.
This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 09/963,349 filed Sep. 25, 2001, titled “Integrated UREA Manufacturing Plants and Processes” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,846 on Oct. 14, 2003.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3617498 | Kittrell | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3972958 | Garwood et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3986349 | Egan | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4059648 | Derr et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4092825 | Egan | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4197184 | Munro et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4202167 | Suggitt et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4256654 | Schlinger et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4308128 | Cummings | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4404088 | Bachtel et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4433065 | van der Burgt et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4496371 | Urban et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4501655 | Hilfman et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4524581 | Cascone et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4549396 | Garwood et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4579985 | Minderhoud et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4595702 | Chu et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4605639 | Dyer et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4617288 | Bell et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4902303 | Den Bleyker | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4957715 | Grover et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4992081 | Den Bleyker | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4994428 | Bell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5023276 | Yarrington et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5026472 | Hoehn et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5255504 | Hodrien et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5289676 | Brown et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5324335 | Benham et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324336 | Child | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5403568 | Stowe, Jr. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5424051 | Nagji et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5500449 | Benham et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504118 | Benham et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5506272 | Benham et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5543437 | Benham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545238 | Brooker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5611947 | Vavruska | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5620670 | Benham et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5621155 | Benham et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5645613 | Benham et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5666800 | Sorensen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5736116 | LeBlanc et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5763716 | Benham et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5993761 | Czernichowski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6153852 | Blutke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156809 | Clark et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6248794 | Gieskes | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6306917 | Bohn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6632846 | Sheppard et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040216465 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09963349 | Sep 2001 | US |
| Child | 10612573 | US |
