All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The field relates generally to resonant wireless power transfer systems, and more specifically to implantable resonant wireless power transfer systems.
Many implantable medical devices require electrical systems to power the implant. Typically, this is achieved using percutaneous wiring to connect a power source to the implant.
More recently, there has been development into powering an implanted device wirelessly with a Transcutaneous Energy Transfer (TET) system, e.g., through an oscillating magnetic field. For a TET system to be useful, electrical energy storage and processing must be provided when external power is interrupted or not available. This electrical energy processing and storage can be implemented with solid-state electronics and a battery.
Typically, implantable medical devices, such as implanted sensors, require very little power to operate. With such low power levels (on the order of milliwatts), power transfer levels and efficiency can be lower. With higher power devices (e.g. on the order of watts and up to 15 W or more), efficient transfer of wireless power is extremely important. Additionally, positions within the body are limited that can accommodate larger implanted devices, some of which are deep below the skin surface. These implant locations require additional attention to position and orientation of both the transmit and receive coils, as well as techniques to improve and maximize transfer efficiency.
Previous TET systems for implantable medical devices required the implanted receiver coil to be positioned just under the skin, and typically include a mechanical feature to align the receive and transmit coils and keep them together. By implanting these devices directly under the skin, the size and power requirements of these implanted devices is limited if they are to be powered by a TET system.
An implantable TET receiver unit is provided, comprising an internal housing, an energy source disposed in the internal housing, a controller disposed in the internal housing, the controller configured to control operation of the TET receiver, a ferrite housing disposed around the internal housing, the ferrite housing configured to reduce an amount of magnetic flux that reaches the internal housing, and at least one wire coil wrapped around the ferrite housing and electrically coupled to the controller, the at least one wire coil configured to receive wireless energy from an external power transmitter.
In one embodiment, the ferrite housing comprises two ferrite halves machined out of solid pieces of ferrite. In some embodiments, the ferrite housing comprises a plurality of ferrite tiles.
In one embodiment, the receiver unit further comprises at least one ferrite fin extending from the ferrite housing and positioned next to the at least one wire coil. In one embodiment, the at least one ferrite fin extends around at least a portion of a perimeter of the ferrite enclosure. In another embodiment, the at least one ferrite fin extends around a perimeter of the ferrite enclosure.
In some embodiments, the at least one wire coil further comprises at least one exciter coil and at least one resonator coil.
In some embodiments, the receiver unit further comprises a first ferrite fin extending from the ferrite enclosure and positioned between the at least one resonator coil and an external wireless power transmitter, and second ferrite fin extending from the ferrite enclosure and positioned between the resonator coil and the exciter coil, and a third ferrite fin extending from the ferrite enclosure and positioned on an opposite side of the exciter coil from the second ferrite fin.
In one embodiment, the at least one ferrite fin is configured to increase a coupling between the at least one wire coil and an external wireless power transmitter. In another embodiment, the at least one ferrite fin is configured to decrease a coupling between a resonator coil and an exciter coil of the at least one wire coil.
In some embodiments, a ferrite gap between the ferrite housing occurs along small sides of the internal housing. In one embodiment, a ferrite gap between the ferrite housing occurs along large sides of the internal housing.
A system for wireless energy transfer is also provided, comprising a transmitter unit comprising a transmitter resonator coil coupled to a power supply and configured to transmit wireless energy, and a receiver unit comprising an internal housing, an energy source disposed in the internal housing, a controller disposed in the internal housing, the controller configured to control operation of the TET receiver, a ferrite housing disposed around the internal housing, the ferrite housing configured to reduce an amount of magnetic flux that reaches the internal housing, and at least one wire coil wrapped around the ferrite housing and electrically coupled to the controller, the at least one wire coil configured to receive wireless energy from the transmitter unit.
In some embodiments, the system further comprises at least one ferrite fin extending from the ferrite housing and positioned next to the at least one wire coil. In one embodiment, the at least one ferrite fin extends around a perimeter of the ferrite enclosure.
In other embodiments, the at least one wire coil further comprises at least one exciter coil and at least one resonator coil.
In some embodiments, the at least one ferrite fin is configured to increase a coupling between the at least one wire coil and the transmitter unit.
In another embodiment, the at least one ferrite fin is configured to decrease a coupling between a resonator coil and an exciter coil of the at least one wire coil.
An implantable TET receiver unit is also provided, comprising an internal housing, an energy source disposed in the internal housing, a controller disposed in the internal housing, the controller configured to control operation of the TET receiver, and a coil structure sized and configured to be placed around the internal housing, the coil structure including at least one wire coil configured to receive wireless energy from an external power transmitter, the coil structure further including at least one ferrite strip disposed near the at least one wire coil and configured to increase a coupling between the at least one coil structure and the external power transmitter.
A method of transmitting and receiving wireless energy is provided, comprising transmitting wireless energy from a transmitter coil into a patient, receiving the wireless energy with a receiver unit implanted in the patient, and preventing magnetic flux from interfering with electronics of the receiver unit with a ferrite enclosure that surrounds the receiver unit.
A method of transmitting and receiving wireless energy is also provided, comprising transmitting wireless energy from a transmitter coil into a patient, receiving the wireless energy with a receiver unit implanted in the patient, and increasing a coupling between the transmitter coil and the receiver unit with a ferrite fin that surrounds the receiver unit and is disposed near a receiver coil of the receiver unit.
In some embodiments, the receiver unit comprises an integrated antenna disposed on or near the internal housing and electrically coupled to the controller. In one embodiment, the integrated antenna is formed on a wall of the ferrite housing.
In another embodiment, the receiver unit further comprises a polymer encapsulating the ferrite housing, the internal housing, and the integrated antenna.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
In the description that follows, like components have been given the same reference numerals, regardless of whether they are shown in different embodiments. To illustrate an embodiment(s) of the present disclosure in a clear and concise manner, the drawings may not necessarily be to scale and certain features may be shown in somewhat schematic form. Features that are described and/or illustrated with respect to one embodiment may be used in the same way or in a similar way in one or more other embodiments and/or in combination with or instead of the features of the other embodiments.
Various aspects of the invention are similar to those described in International Patent Pub. No. WO2012045050; U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,667,452; 8,669,676; 8,569,914; 8,627,447; 8,489,200; 8,140,168; 7,865,245; 7,774,069; 7,711,433; 7,650,187; 7,571,007; 7,741,734; 7,825,543; 6,591,139; 6,553,263; and 5,350,413; and U.S. Pub. Nos. 2013/0320773; 2013/0127253; 2010/0308939; 2008/027293; and 2010/0102639, the entire contents of which patents and applications are incorporated herein for all purposes.
Wireless Power Transmission System
Power may be transmitted wirelessly by magnetic induction. In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are closely coupled.
In some cases “closely coupled” or “close coupling” refers to a system that requires the coils to be very near each other in order to operate. In some cases “loosely coupled” or “loose coupling” refers to a system configured to operate when the coils have a significant spatial and/or axial separation, and in some cases up to distance equal to or less than the diameter of the larger of the coils. In some cases, “loosely coupled” or “loose coupling” refers a system that is relatively insensitive to changes in physical separation and/or orientation of the receiver and transmitter. In some cases, a loosely coupled system is a highly resonant wireless energy transfer system.
In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are non-resonant coils. For example, a change in current in one coil induces a changing magnetic field. The second coil within the magnetic field picks up the magnetic flux, which in turn induces a current in the second coil. An example of a closely coupled system with non-resonant coils is described in International Pub. No. WO2000/074747, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference. A conventional transformer is another example of a closely coupled, non-resonant system. In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are resonant coils. For example, one or both of the coils is connected to a tuning capacitor or other means for controlling the frequency in the respective coil. An example of closely coupled system with resonant coils is described in International Pub. Nos. WO2001/037926; WO2012/087807; WO2012/087811; WO2012/087816; WO2012/087819; WO2010/030378; and WO2012/056365, and U.S. Pub. No. 2003/0171792, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are loosely coupled. For example, the transmitter can resonate to propagate magnetic flux that is picked up by the receiver at relatively great distances. In some cases energy can be transmitted over 3 cm, over 5 cm, over 7 cm, or over 10 cm. In some cases energy can be transmitted over several meters. In some cases energy can be transmitted to a deep body implant. In a loosely coupled system power transfer may not necessarily depend on a critical distance. Rather, the system may be able to accommodate changes to the coupling coefficient between the transmitter and receiver. An example of a loosely coupled system is described in International Pub. No. WO2012/045050, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
In various embodiments, the system is able to accommodate ongoing changes to the coupling coefficient between the transmitter and receiver during operation. In the case of an implantable device receiving wireless energy, for example, the relative orientation of the transmitter and receiver is constantly changing. Indeed, sometimes the components can vibrate or move at a rapid pace, which presents challenges to conventional highly-resonant, loosely-coupled systems.
Power may be transmitted wirelessly by radiating energy. In various embodiments, the system comprises antennas. The antennas may be resonant or non-resonant. For example, non-resonant antennas may radiate electromagnetic waves to create a field. The field can be near field or far field. The field can be directional. Generally far field has greater range but a lower power transfer rate. An example of such a system for radiating energy with resonators is described in International Pub. No. WO2010/089354, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference. An example of such a non-resonant system is described in International Pub. No. WO2009/018271, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference. Instead of antenna, the system may comprise a high energy light source such as a laser. The system can be configured so photons carry electromagnetic energy in a spatially restricted, direct, coherent path from a transmission point to a receiving point. An example of such a system is described in International Pub. No. WO2010/089354, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
Power may also be transmitted by taking advantage of the material or medium through which the energy passes. For example, volume conduction involves transmitting electrical energy through tissue between a transmitting point and a receiving point. An example of such a system is described in International Pub. No. WO2008/066941, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
Power may also be transferred using a capacitor charging technique. The system can be resonant or non-resonant. Exemplars of capacitor charging for wireless energy transfer are described in International Pub. No. WO2012/056365, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
The system in accordance with various aspects of the invention will now be described in connection with a system for wireless energy transfer by magnetic induction. The exemplary system utilizes resonant power transfer. The system works by transmitting power between the two inductively coupled coils. In contrast to a transformer, however, the exemplary coils are not coupled together closely. A transformer generally requires the coils to be aligned and positioned directly adjacent each other. The exemplary system accommodates looser coupling of the coils.
While described in terms of one receiver coil and one transmitter coil, one will appreciate from the description herein that the system may use two or more receiver coils and two or more transmitter coils. For example, the transmitter may be configured with two coils—a first coil to resonate flux and a second coil to excite the first coil. In various embodiments, the system uses a plurality of coils with at least one of the coils configured as a repeater. One will further appreciate from the description herein that usage of “resonator” and “coil” may be used somewhat interchangeably. In various respects, “resonator” refers to a coil and a capacitor connected together. In various respects, “transmitter” and “receiver” refer to coils.
In accordance with various embodiments of this disclosure, the system comprises one or more transmitters configured to transmit power wirelessly to one or more receivers. In various embodiments, the system includes a transmitter and more than one receiver in a multiplexed arrangement. A frequency generator may be electrically coupled to the transmitter to drive the transmitter to transmit power at a particular frequency or range of frequencies. The frequency generator can include a voltage controlled oscillator and one or more switchable arrays of capacitors, a voltage controlled oscillator and one or more varactors, a phase-locked-loop, a direct digital synthesizer, or combinations thereof. The transmitter can be configured to transmit power at multiple frequencies simultaneously. The frequency generator can include two or more phase-locked-loops electrically coupled to a common reference oscillator, two or more independent voltage controlled oscillators, or combinations thereof. The transmitter can be arranged to simultaneously delivery power to multiple receivers at a common frequency.
In various embodiments, the transmitter is configured to transmit a low power signal at a particular frequency. The transmitter may transmit the low power signal for a particular time and/or interval. In various embodiments, the transmitter is configured to transmit a high power signal wirelessly at a particular frequency. The transmitter may transmit the high power signal for a particular time and/or interval.
In various embodiments, the receiver includes a frequency selection mechanism electrically coupled to the receiver coil and arranged to allow the resonator to change a frequency or a range of frequencies that the receiver can receive. The frequency selection mechanism can include a switchable array of discrete capacitors, a variable capacitance, one or more inductors electrically coupled to the receiving antenna, additional turns of a coil of the receiving antenna, or combinations thereof. An example of a suitable switching mechanism is a field effect transistor (FET). FETs can be advantage because of their low power losses.
In general, most of the flux from the transmitter coil does not reach the receiver coil. The amount of flux generated by the transmitter coil that reaches the receiver coil is described by “k” and referred to as the “coupling coefficient.”
In various embodiments, the system is configured to maintain a value of k in the range of between about 0.2 to about 0.01. In various embodiments, the system is configured to maintain a value of k of at least 0.01, at least 0.02, at least 0.03, at least 0.04, or at least 0.05. Even though the coupling coefficient (k) may be small, the exemplary system provides adequate, useful energy transfer through strong coupling and other energy transfer efficiencies. In one example, the system uses highly resonant structures to overcome the small coupling coefficient.
In various embodiments, the coils are physically separated. In various embodiments, the separation is greater than a thickness of the receiver coil. In various embodiments, the separation distance is equal to or less than the diameter of the larger of the receiver and transmitter coil.
Because most of the flux does not reach the receiver, the transmitter coil must generate a much larger field than what is coupled to the receiver. In various embodiments, this is accomplished by configuring the transmitter with a large number of amp-turns in the coil.
Since only the flux coupled to the receiver gets coupled to a real load, most of the energy in the field is reactive. The current in the coil can be sustained with a capacitor connected to the coil to create a resonator. The power source thus only needs to supply the energy absorbed by the receiver. The resonant capacitor maintains the excess flux that is not coupled to the receiver.
In various embodiments, the impedance of the receiver is matched to the transmitter. This allows efficient transfer of energy out of the receiver. In this case the receiver coil may not need to have a resonant capacitor.
Turning now to
The exemplary transmitter includes a coil Lx connected to a power source Vs by a capacitor Cx. The exemplary receiver includes a coil Ly connected to a load by a capacitor Cy. Capacitor Cx may be configured to make Lx resonate at a desired frequency. Capacitance Cx of the transmitter coil may be defined by its geometry. Inductors Lx and Ly are connected by coupling coefficient k. Mxy is the mutual inductance between the two coils. The mutual inductance, Mxy, is related to coupling coefficient, k.
Mxy=k√{square root over (Lx·Ly)}
In the exemplary system the power source Vs is in series with the transmitter coil Lx so it may have to carry all the reactive current. This puts a larger burden on the current rating of the power source and any resistance in the source will add to losses.
The exemplary system includes a receiver configured to receive energy wirelessly transmitted by the transmitter. The exemplary receiver is connected to a load. The receiver and load may be connected electrically with a controllable switch.
In various embodiments, the receiver includes a circuit element configured to be connected or disconnected from the receiver coil by an electronically controllable switch. The electrical coupling can include both a serial and parallel arrangement. The circuit element can include a resistor, capacitor, inductor, lengths of an antenna structure, or combinations thereof. The system can be configured such that power is transmitted by the transmitter and can be received by the receiver in predetermined time increments.
In various embodiments, the transmitter coil and/or the receiver coil is a substantially two-dimensional structure. In various embodiments, the transmitter coil may be coupled to a transmitter impedance-matching structure. Similarly, the receiver coil may be coupled to a receiver impedance-matching structure. Examples of suitable impedance-matching structures include, but are not limited to, a coil, a loop, a transformer, and/or any impedance-matching network. An impedance-matching network may include inductors or capacitors configured to connect a signal source to the resonator structure.
In various embodiments, the transmitter is controlled by a controller (not shown) and driving circuit. The controller and/or driving circuit may include a directional coupler, a signal generator, and/or an amplifier. The controller may be configured to adjust the transmitter frequency or amplifier gain to compensate for changes to the coupling between the receiver and transmitter.
In various embodiments, the transmitter coil is connected to an impedance-matched coil loop. The loop is connected to a power source and is configured to excite the transmitter coil. The first coil loop may have finite output impedance. A signal generator output may be amplified and fed to the transmitter coil. In use power is transferred magnetically between the first coil loop and the main transmitter coil, which in turns transmits flux to the receiver. Energy received by the receiver coil is delivered by Ohmic connection to the load.
One of the challenges to a practical circuit is how to get energy in and out of the resonators. Simply putting the power source and load in series or parallel with the resonators is difficult because of the voltage and current required. In various embodiments, the system is configured to achieve an approximate energy balance by analyzing the system characteristics, estimating voltages and currents involved, and controlling circuit elements to deliver the power needed by the receiver.
In an exemplary embodiment, the system load power, PL, is assumed to be 15 Watts and the operating frequency of the system, f, is 250 kHz. Then, for each cycle the load removes a certain amount of energy from the resonance:
It has been found that the energy in the receiver resonance is typically several times larger than the energy removed by the load for operative, implantable medical devices. In various embodiments, the system assumes a ratio 7:1 for energy at the receiver versus the load removed. Under this assumption, the instantaneous energy in the exemplary receiver resonance is 420 μJ.
The exemplary circuit was analyzed and the self inductance of the receiver coil was found to be 60 uH. From the energy and the inductance, the voltage and current in the resonator could be calculated.
The voltage and current can be traded off against each other. The inductor may couple the same amount of flux regardless of the number of turns. The Amp-turns of the coil needs to stay the same in this example, so more turns means the current is reduced. The coil voltage, however, will need to increase. Likewise, the voltage can be reduced at the expense of a higher current. The transmitter coil needs to have much more flux. The transmitter flux is related to the receiver flux by the coupling coefficient. Accordingly, the energy in the field from the transmitter coil is scaled by k.
Given that k is 0.05:
For the same circuit the self inductance of the transmitter coil was 146 uH as mentioned above. This results in:
From this example one can appreciate the competing factors and how to balance voltage, current, and inductance to suit the circumstance and achieve the desired outcome. Like the receiver, the voltage and current can be traded off against each other. In this example, the voltages and currents in the system are relatively high. One can adjust the tuning to lower the voltage and/or current at the receiver if the load is lower.
Estimation of Coupling Coefficient and Mutual Inductance
As explained above, the coupling coefficient, k, may be useful for a number of reasons. In one example, the coupling coefficient can be used to understand the arrangement of the coils relative to each other so tuning adjustments can be made to ensure adequate performance. If the receiver coil moves away from the transmitter coil, the mutual inductance will decrease, and ceteris paribus, less power will be transferred. In various embodiments, the system is configured to make tuning adjustments to compensate for the drop in coupling efficiency.
The exemplary system described above often has imperfect information. For various reasons as would be understood by one of skill in the art, the system does not collect data for all parameters. Moreover, because of the physical gap between coils and without an external means of communications between the two resonators, the transmitter may have information that the receiver does not have and vice versa. These limitations make it difficult to directly measure and derive the coupling coefficient, k, in real time.
Described below are several principles for estimating the coupling coefficient, k, for two coils of a given geometry. The approaches may make use of techniques such as Biot-Savart calculations or finite element methods. Certain assumptions and generalizations, based on how the coils interact in specific orientations, are made for the sake of simplicity of understanding. From an electric circuit point of view, all the physical geometry permutations can generally lead to the coupling coefficient.
If two coils are arranged so they are in the same plane, with one coil circumscribing the other, then the coupling coefficient can be estimated to be roughly proportional to the ratio of the area of the two coils. This assumes the flux generated by coil 1 is roughly uniform over the area it encloses as shown in
If the coils are out of alignment such that the coils are at a relative angle, the coupling coefficient will decrease. The amount of the decrease is estimated to be about equal to the cosine of the angle as shown in
If the coils are arraigned such that half the flux from one coil is in one direction and the other half is in the other direction, the flux cancels out and the coupling coefficient is zero, as shown in
A final principle relies on symmetry of the coils. The coupling coefficient and mutual inductance from one coil to the other is assumed to be the same regardless of which coil is being energized.
Mxy=Myx
Exemplary TET System
In a TET system, many factors must be considered when designing the implantable receiver components. In particular, the implanted components should be small and light enough to be implanted within the body, toxic and dangerous electrical and battery components should be isolated from the body, and the implant should be designed in a way to maximize its ability to receive wireless power from the transmitter while reducing or eliminating the generation of heat within the body. Various embodiments of a TET implant are described in this disclosure to address these factors. As used herein, TET system refers to the larger system including, for example, data communication and power storage. In one embodiment, the TET system includes two or more implants to house an internal power source, circuitry, and a data communication subsystem. The data communication system may include an antenna. The antenna may be housed in one of the implant housing, or the antenna may be attached to the outside of an implant housing. U.S. Pub. No. 2007/0142696, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, shows and describes various configurations for housing the various system components in the body.
Construction and design of one exemplary implantable TETS receiver unit will now be described.
The internal housing can include openings 508 on at least one side of the housing to accommodate electronic feed-throughs for components connected to the receiver unit. In some embodiments, the feed-throughs can comprise an implantable medical device feed-through 510, a radio feed-through 512, and a TET feed-through 514. These feed-throughs can be used to connect the receiver unit to any number of electronic devices for the transfer of power and/or data to those devices. It should be understood that any number of openings 508 and feed-throughs can be incorporated into the housing, depending on the specific application or needs. The feed-throughs are shown as male connectors, but in other embodiments the feed-throughs can comprise female connectors, or other types of electrical connectors known in the art.
Referring now to
In various embodiments, ferrite layer enclosure 826 is formed of two or more layers of ferrite. In one embodiment, a low frequency ferrite is formed over the titanium can of internal housing 806. A relatively high frequency ferrite is formed over the low frequency ferrite. In one embodiment, the low frequency ferrite is thicker than the high frequency ferrite. The combination of low frequency and high frequency ferrite materials enhances shielding across a wider spectrum of frequencies. In one example, it provides shielding at both the TETS operating frequency and RF operating frequency.
As also shown in
As shown in
In the case of a titanium internal housing 806, the size of the gaps can become an issue because of titanium's relatively high resistivity (for a metal). The magnetic fields that enter these ferrite gaps can create a significant amount of heat when interacting with the titanium enclosure. Mathematically, as the ferrite gap increases to cover a larger surface area, the tolerance on the gap must be tighter to reduce the amount of induced heat below a safe and reasonable level. For example, if a maximum amount of heat allowed in the TETS receiver is 100 mW of heat, then the maximum allowable gap between the ferrite core halves in
Referring now to
Ferrite fin 1029B separates the receiver's resonator 1034A and exciter 1034b coils and can be configured to decrease the coupling between the resonator and exciter coils. The fin accomplishes this by conducting some magnetic field (that would otherwise be picked up by the exciter coil) away from the receiver, so that it is not picked up by the exciter. The width w of the fin 1029B can be relatively large compared to the width w of the other ferrite fins. To optimize the coupling between the resonator and exciter, the width must be determined from case to case; too large and the coupling may end up less than optimum. Another effect of the fin 1029B is that it also decouples the transmitter coil from the exciter coil.
The third ferrite fin 1029C can be configured to shield the receiver from influence by foreign objects behind the receiver. The width w of the fin 1029c can also be relatively large compared to the width of the first ferrite fin.
All three types of ferrite fins can be configured to increase the self inductance of the coil they are next to. This can be beneficial because it reduces the required number of turns of those coils, saving weight and also increasing the coil's quality factor Q (i.e., increasing the ratio of inductance to resistance).
One possible disadvantage of using fins is that it makes the design of a reversible receiver (one that can have the same transmitter oriented on either side of it) more difficult. First off, a reversible receiver cannot use a wide rear fin 1029c, because the fin becomes a pick-up fin when the transmitter is located on the same side. Second, use of a wide central fin 1029b may decouple the receiver's resonator coil from the transmitter, lowering overall system efficiency. To prevent this, the resonator can be split into two halves, with the exciter in between and using two decoupler fins, but this comes at a cost of reduced Q for the resonator. Another possibility is to split the exciter into two halves, with the resonator in between, using two central fins, and reduce the width of the central fins. This lowers Q of the exciter, but can be a good solution for a reversible receiver. Note that if the transmitter on the back side of the receiver is of a different type (e.g., a large stationary coil under a bed), it may be the case that the receiver does not have to be made reversible. The design of the receiver may therefore depend on the design requirements and desired amount of flexibility for the implanting physician.
There can be a small gap between each fin and the ferrite cover without causing any heating (this is not an issue for these particular gaps), although they should be kept reasonably small (about 100 microns or less) to avoid too much loss of the intended function of the fins.
Coil structure 1140 of
Also shown in
The entire coil structure 1140 can comprise a plastic, polyurethane, epoxy, or similar material to enclose the coil resonators and the ferrite strips. The coil structure can be sized and configured to provide a snug and tight fit around the internal housing of
The method of making the implanted system will now be described. The coil structure 1140 is formed by winding wires around ferrite strips 1129. The assembled coil unit is then overmolded with epoxy to hold it together and form coil structure 1140. The internal housing 1106 is formed in a manner as described above. The internal housing 1106 is then inserted into the middle 1142 of the coil structure 1140. Thereafter the housing 1106 assembled with the coil structure 1140 is processed similar to above. The coil structure is electrically connected to the internal housing. The whole structure is formed together, for example, by overmolding with a polymer. An antenna such as antenna 936 (shown in
As shown in
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Various modifications to the above embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
In particular, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. Furthermore, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, unless explicitly stated otherwise, the term “or” is inclusive of all presented alternatives, and means essentially the same as the commonly used phrase “and/or.” It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/794,258, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, titled “Integrated Implantable TETS Housing Including Fins and Coil Loops”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4041955 | Kelly et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4561443 | Hogrefe et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4561444 | Livingston et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4630615 | Yomtov | Dec 1986 | A |
4679560 | Galbraith | Jul 1987 | A |
4726378 | Kaplan | Feb 1988 | A |
4736747 | Drake | Apr 1988 | A |
4924171 | Baba et al. | May 1990 | A |
5346458 | Affeld | Sep 1994 | A |
5350413 | Miller | Sep 1994 | A |
5569156 | Mussivand | Oct 1996 | A |
5630836 | Prem et al. | May 1997 | A |
5690693 | Wang et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702431 | Wang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5755748 | Borza | May 1998 | A |
5771438 | Palermo et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5831248 | Hojyo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5948006 | Mann | Sep 1999 | A |
6123726 | Mori et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6149683 | Lancisi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6212430 | Kung | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6296533 | Grubbs et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312338 | Sato et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320354 | Sengupta et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324431 | Zarinetchi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327504 | Dolgin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6389318 | Zarinetchi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6442434 | Zarinetchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451055 | Weiss | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458164 | Weiss | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478820 | Weiss | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6553263 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579315 | Weiss | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591139 | Loftin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605032 | Benkowski et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6647298 | Abrahamson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650213 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6723039 | French et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6772011 | Dolgin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6801807 | Abrahamson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810289 | Shaquer | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850803 | Jimenez et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6894456 | Tsukamoto et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895281 | Amundson et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6949065 | Sporer et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960968 | Odendaal et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967621 | Cadotte, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985773 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015769 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7107103 | Schulman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126310 | Barron | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7225032 | Schmeling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246040 | Borg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286880 | Olson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7428438 | Parramon et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7471986 | Hatlestad | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496733 | Altman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505816 | Schmeling et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515012 | Schulman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522878 | Baarman | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7532901 | LaFranchise et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7565187 | Dynok et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7571007 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574173 | Terranova et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587241 | Parramon et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599743 | Hassler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7650187 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650192 | Wahlstrand | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7711433 | Davis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720546 | Ginggen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7741734 | Joannopoulos et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761164 | Verhoef et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774069 | Olson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782190 | Martin et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7805200 | Kast et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7812481 | Iisaka et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818036 | Lair et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818037 | Lair et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825543 | Karalis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7830114 | Reed | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7865245 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7872367 | Recksiek et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7904170 | Harding | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7932696 | Peterson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962222 | He et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
RE42682 | Barreras et al. | Sep 2011 | E |
8076801 | Karalis et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081925 | Parramon et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096954 | Stahmann et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140168 | Olson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150529 | Snell et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165694 | Carbanaru et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185212 | Carbunaru et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8193766 | Rondoni et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8203434 | Yoshida | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244367 | Wahlstrand et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8247926 | Issa et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8258653 | Kitamura et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265770 | Toy et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8278784 | Cook et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292052 | Bohori et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299652 | Sample et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301079 | Baarman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319473 | Choi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8362742 | Kallmyer | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373310 | Baarman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378522 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378523 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463395 | Forsell | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489200 | Zarinetchi et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8551163 | Aber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562508 | Dague et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8581793 | Carr | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587154 | Fells et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8620447 | D'Ambrosio et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628460 | Yomtov et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629578 | Kurs et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8668473 | Larose et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8810071 | Sauerlaender et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8884468 | Lemmens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8971958 | Frikart et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002468 | Shea et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9106083 | Partovi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9192704 | Yomtov et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9515494 | Kurs et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9515495 | Kurs et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20020038138 | Zarinetchi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087204 | Kung et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093456 | Sawamura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030171792 | Zarinetchi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040138725 | Forsell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040256146 | Frericks | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006083 | Chen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050288743 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060271129 | Tai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070096686 | Jimenez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123948 | Dal Molin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142696 | Crosby et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191706 | Calderon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080009198 | Marino | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027293 | Vodermayer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080100294 | Rohling et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149736 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167531 | McDermott | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211320 | Cook et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090018616 | Quick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090051224 | Cook et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072628 | Cook et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081943 | Dobyns et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090174264 | Onishi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212736 | Baarman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226328 | Morello | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270679 | Hoeg et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284220 | Toncich et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100019985 | Bashyam et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033021 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100035453 | Tronnes et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045114 | Sample et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063347 | Yomtov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066305 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069992 | Aghassian et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100109958 | Haubrich et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114143 | Albrecht et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122995 | Thomas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100171368 | Schatz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100184371 | Cook et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194334 | Kirby et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210233 | Cook et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211134 | Forsell | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222848 | Forsell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222849 | Forsell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100225174 | Jiang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244576 | Hillan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256708 | Thornton et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277121 | Hall et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308939 | Kurs | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100314946 | Budde et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331919 | DiGiore et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025132 | Sato | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043050 | Yabe et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046699 | Mazanec | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057607 | Carobolante | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101790 | Budgett | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109263 | Sakoda et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115431 | Dunworth et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127848 | Ryu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148215 | Marzetta et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178361 | Yomtov | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234155 | Chen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241436 | Furukawa | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110245892 | Kast et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110266880 | Kim et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276110 | Whitehurst et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110278948 | Forsell | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291489 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110291613 | Rosik et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295345 | Wells et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298294 | Takada et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301667 | Olson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313238 | Reichenbach et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001485 | Uchida | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120032522 | Schatz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039102 | Shinoda | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057322 | Waffenschmidt | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065458 | Tol | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120080957 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120091951 | Sohn | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104997 | Carobolante | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109256 | Meskins et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119914 | Uchida | May 2012 | A1 |
20120146575 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120149229 | Kearsley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150259 | Meskens | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120153954 | Ota et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157753 | D'Ambrosio | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157754 | D'Ambrosio | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161539 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164943 | Bennett | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169132 | Choudhary et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169133 | Lisi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169137 | Lisi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169139 | Kudo | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169278 | Choi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120175967 | Dibben et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120245649 | Bohori et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245664 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259398 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120274148 | Sung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306433 | Kim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007949 | Kurs et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060103 | Bergida et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130119773 | Davis | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127253 | Stark et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159956 | Verghese et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190551 | Callaway et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130241468 | Moshfeghi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271088 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289334 | Badstibner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310630 | Smith et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130320773 | Schatz et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331638 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005466 | Crosby et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011447 | Konanur et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028110 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028111 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031606 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140265620 | Hoarau et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275727 | Bonde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150229289 | Suzuki | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150326030 | Malpas | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160218432 | Pope et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160250484 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254703 | Hansen | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254704 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202012000166 | Jun 2013 | DE |
102012201073 | Jul 2013 | DE |
1513241 | Mar 2005 | EP |
H03109063 | May 1991 | JP |
11-506646 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2013094456 | May 2013 | JP |
2013161640 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2014160611 | Sep 2014 | JP |
1020020089605 | Nov 2002 | KR |
1020120007296 | Jan 2012 | KR |
1020120077448 | Jul 2012 | KR |
0001442 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0074747 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0137926 | May 2001 | WO |
WO2005106901 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2007053881 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2008066941 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2009018271 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009021220 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009023905 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009042977 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2010030378 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2010089354 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011081626 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011113934 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO2012002063 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012056365 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012087807 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012087811 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012087816 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012087819 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012099965 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO2012141752 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013110602 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013138451 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO2014039673 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Development and Implementation of RFID Technology, Ed. Cristina Turcu, Feb. 2009, pp. 28-30, 93-97. |
Merli, Francesco, et al., “Design, Realization and Measurements of a Miniature Antenna for Implantable Wireless Communication Systems”, IEEE Transaction on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, No. 10, Oct. 2011, pp. 3544-3555. |
Merli, Francesco, et al.,“The Effect of Insulating Layers on the Performance of Implanted Antennas”, IEEE Transaction on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 21-31. |
Abadia, Javier, et al., 3D-Spiral Small Antenna Design and Realization for Biomdical Telemetry in the MICS Band. Radioengineering, vol. 18, No. 4, Dec. 2009, pp. 359-367. |
Bonde et al.; Promise of unrestricted mobility with innovative, portable wireless powering of a mechanical circulatory assist device; American Association for Thoracic Surgery; © 2012; 2 pgs.; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://aats.org/annualmeeting/Abstracts/2012/T8.cgi. |
Chargepoint, Inc.; -chargepoin+®; product brochure; 4 pgs.; © 2014; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://www.chargepoint.com/network/. |
Dixon, Jr.; Eddy current losses in transformer windings and circuit wiring; Unitrode Corp. Seminar Manual (SEM600); Watertown, MA; 12 pgs.; 1988 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date). |
Evatran; PluglessTM Level 2 EV Charging System (3.3kW); product brochure; 7 pgs.; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://www.pluglesspower.com/tech-specs/. |
Ferret, B.; Electric vehicles get big boost!; Renewable Energy World; 3 pgs.; Jul. 30, 2012; retrieved Jul. 30, 2012 from the internet: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2012/07/. |
Motavalli, Jim; WiTricity Takes Its Car-Charging Technology Out for a Road Test; New York Times; 3 pgs.; Jul. 25, 2012; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/25/witricity-takes-its-car-charging-technology-out-for-a-road-test/. |
Petersen et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,708 entitled “Wireless Battery Charging,” filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Petersen, E.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,820 entitled “Variable Capacitor for Resonant Power Transfer Systems,” filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Petersen, E.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,823 entitled “Resonant Power Transfer System and Method of Estimating System State,” filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Hansen, J.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,832 entitled “Resonant Power Transfer Systems With Protective Algorithm,” filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Petersen et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,840 entitled “Computer Modeling for Resonant Power Transfer Systems,” filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Hansen, J.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,842 entitled “Resonant Power Transmission Coils and Systems,” filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/051474, mailed Dec. 30, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140265621 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61794258 | Mar 2013 | US |