The present invention relates to journal bearings, and more particularly, to journal bearings integrating both fluid film and magnetic load carrying elements.
Fluid Film Bearings (FFBs) and Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) are competing devices in the marketplace. FFBs, in particular Journal Bearings (JBs), are superior load carrying elements due to their larger load carrying capacity and their ability to introduce passive damping to the rotor system. However, JBs exhibit an unstable vibration at high speed, called oil whip, which is excited when the rotor speed reaches about twice the first critical speed. This instability limits the possibility of increasing the rotor speed of rotation.
AMBs, on the other hand, provide contactless rotor support, at high speeds and are free from whip instabilities. They have an added feature which is their capabilities as controlling elements. AMBs can provide variable and controllable stiffness and damping and additionally can provide unbalance control and many other control features. However, AMBs suffer from certain shortcomings. In particular reliability issues are always a concern for AMB designers. In fact, AMBs are always designed with a redundant bearing system, called a “backup bearing”, such that the backup bearing carries the rotor in case of AMB failure.
The present invention provides a smart high performance integrated bearing that combines a fluid film bearing (FFB) with an electro-magnetic actuator (EMA) in one integrated device. In all cases, the fluid film bearing shall carry the load, whereas the electro-magnetic actuator can be used as a pure controller or both as a controller and a load carrying element. In the latter case the electro-magnetic actuator can be considered as an active magnetic bearing (AMB).
The integration of AMBs and JBs in one device, referring to herein as an integrated journal bearing (IJB), has clear advantages. The IJB has all of the advantages of JBs and AMBs, and avoids all of the shortcomings of AMBs and JBs. The IJB is a superior load carrying element due to its larger load carrying capacity and its ability to introduce passive damping to the rotor system. Moreover, it is free from whip instabilities and has capabilities as a controller. An IJB can provide variable and controllable stiffness and damping and additionally can provide unbalance control and many other control features. Most importantly, there is no need for a backup bearing as the rotor is carried on the JB in all cases.
It is thus a general object of this invention to provide an improved bearing for rotating machines.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a fluid film bearing integrated with an electro-magnetic actuator confined in one space.
It is another object of this invention to provide a fluid film bearing integrated with an electro-magnetic actuator confined in one space filled with oil.
It is still another object of this invention to provide an electro-magnetic actuator within the integrated bearing that acts as an active magnetic bearing.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide an active magnetic bearing within the integrated bearing that may or may not carry a load.
It is a particular object of this invention to provide a superior load carrying element.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide a load carrying element with superior load carrying capacity.
It is another object of this invention to provide a load carrying element that can introduce passive damping to the rotor system.
It is a yet another object of this invention to provide a load carrying element that is free from whip instabilities.
It is a still another object of this invention to provide a load carrying element that can act as a controller.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a load carrying element that can provide a variable and controllable stiffness and damping.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide a load carrying element that can provide unbalance control.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide a load carrying element that can provide many active control features.
It is still an additional object of this invention to provide a superior load carrying element that can provide all the above features without the need for a backup bearing.
Advantageously, an integrated journal bearing according to the present invention may simultaneously achieve all the above objectives.
In a preferred embodiment, the magnetic bearing surrounds a laminated rotor and maintains its own suitable clearance. Two journals (possibly with the same diameter as the laminated rotor) are assembled on each side of the AMB and maintain the rotor laminations in place. The two JBs are installed over the two journals, with their own particular clearance. Oil conduits introduce oil into the two JBs, which is allowed to flow freely into the AMB space. Oil seals are used to seal the oil flow outside the integrated bearing.
This embodiment achieves the required objectives in a unique way. To maintain symmetry, two journal bearings surround an AMB in one confined space. Oil is introduced in the confined space thus flooding both the AMB and the FFB. A controller is then used to control the AMB to achieve the required performance.
In another embodiment only one FFB and one AMB is used. In this embodiment the magnetic bearing surrounds a laminated rotor and maintains its own suitable clearance. A journal (possibly with the same diameter as the laminated rotor) is assembled beside the AMB and maintains the rotor laminations in place. The JB is installed over the journal, with its own particular clearance. Oil conduits introduce oil into the JB, which is allowed to flow freely into the AMB space. Oil seals are used to seal the oil flow outside the integrated bearing.
Other possible embodiments with two AMBs and one FFB are possible, and people skilled in the art can clearly select the most suitable embodiment for the particular application at hand.
It should be clear that for the purposes of this application it does not matter whether the FFB is a JB or an elliptic bearing, or a pressure dam bearing or a multi-lobe bearing or even a tilting-pad bearing. Similarly it does not matter whether the AMB is a load-carrying AMB or just an EMA. The particular design and the field of application shall dictate the type of FFB and AMB used.
The inventor in his invention of U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 in 2010 revealed the possibility of integrating FFBs with AMBs in one device. This was a major breakthrough. Up to that date, no one in his right mind would consider adding oil to a magnetic bearing. In fact, promoters of AMBs hailed them as “oil-free” devices, claiming this as one of their advantages. U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 was a paradigm shift in thinking where oil is introduced into an AMB.
The specifications of U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 explain that the integrated bearing can have the form of one integral bearing having the fluid film bearing within the magnetic bearing, such that the fluid for the fluid film bearing passes over the rotor of the magnetic bearing, and within the clearance between the rotor and stator in the magnetic bearing.
However, in this case a design issue will appear, since the magnetic bearing will require a large clearance to dissipate generated heat, and the fluid film bearing will require small clearance to improve load carrying capacity. This design issue can be tackled in two ways, one is to select a compromise clearance between the two conflicting requirements, and the other is to use a small clearance for loading in the fluid film bearing, and use an increased fluid low to dissipate the generated heat in the magnetic bearing.
Similar to U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601, this application considers the FFB and the AMB as an integrated bearing, but contrary to U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 the FFB and the AMB do not share the same clearance. In this invention the integrated bearing consists of an AMB and an FFB that are integrated in one device but do not share a clearance. However both the AMB and the FFB are flooded in oil.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 reveals that the invention actually relies on the advantages and shortcomings of both devices. The invention is to use a fluid film bearing (whether it is a cylindrical journal bearing, an elliptic bearing, an offset-half bearing, a multi-lobe bearing, or a tilting-pad bearing, does not really matter) as a primary load carrying bearing, and to use a magnetic bearing in combination with the fluid film bearing to control the instability. This should be quite an efficient combination, where the combination results in bearings that can be used at high speeds without having neither stability nor reliability problems.
Moreover U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 refers to many patents that cover magnetic bearings, e.g.,
However, none of these patents discuss the use of magnetic bearings as a means of controlling journal bearings instability. Actually, most of the state-of-the-art, and the current development efforts in magnetic bearings, are for the use of magnetic bearings as a primary load carrying element, and to use the excess control action to provide some desirable stability benefits in rotating machines
Also, U.S. Pat. No. 7,836,601 refers to many patents that cover fluid film bearings, e.g.,
However, none of these patents suggest the use of magnetic bearings as a means of controlling fluid film instabilities.
Actually, the development of magnetic bearings and the development of fluid film bearings are two completely separate items, and investigators in both areas do not appreciate the developments in the other area, as if they are two different islands.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,353,273, Hybrid foil-magnetic bearing is an exception. In that invention, it is suggested that both the foil bearing and the magnetic bearing are used as load carrying elements. It is possible to do so to carry large load, such that each of the foil bearing and the magnetic bearing carry part of the load. However, in the opinion of this inventor, that is not a good solution. The hybrid foil-magnetic bearing, although capable of operating at high speeds, still suffers from the same disadvantages of magnetic bearings.
Although fluid film bearings and magnetic bearings are well known devices, yet it is not obvious that they can be used in a combined form, since the current technology is that these are competing devices not complementing devices. Both are considered load carrying devices that have certain control capabilities (passive control for fluid film bearings and active control for magnetic bearings). It is thus an invention to consider the magnetic bearing only as a controlling device, and the fluid film bearing as only a load carrying device. Their combined effect is to have bearings with the advantages of large load carrying capacity, excellent reliability, and use at high speeds without instability, in addition to all the known advantages of fluid film bearings and magnetic bearings. Moreover, an additional advantage will appear, since the magnetic bearing is not used as a load carrying element, the power requirements will be reduced, and thus smaller, lighter magnetic bearings can be used that can control the rotor vibrations reliably.
In the accompanying drawings:
This invention is a smart high performance integrated bearing that combines a fluid film bearing (FFB) with an electro-magnetic actuator (EMA) in one integrated device. In all cases, the fluid film bearing shall carry the load, whereas the electro-magnetic actuator can be used as a pure controller or both as a controller and a load carrying element. In the latter case the electro-magnetic actuator can be considered as an active magnetic bearing (AMB).
The integration of AMBs and JBs in one device, the integrated journal bearing (IJB), has clear advantages. The IJB has all of the advantages of JBs and AMBs, and avoids all of the shortcomings of AMBs and JBs. The IJB is a superior load carrying element due to its larger load carrying capacity and its ability to introduce passive damping to the rotor system. Moreover, it is free from whip instabilities and has capabilities as a controller. An IJB can provide variable and controllable stiffness and damping and additionally can provide unbalance control and many other control features. Most importantly, there is no need for a backup bearing as the rotor is carried on the JB in all cases.
The same embodiment is shown in
The inventor has applied many control algorithms similar to the block diagram in
In all of the above experiments an off-the-shelf programmable controller is used. The control algorithms discussed in the previous paragraph were all implemented experimentally, and were quite successful. The choice of the control algorithm is a matter of choice for each application. In many cases, it is important to instruct the magnetic bearing not to interfere with the load carrying by the JB. In fact the H∞ controller introduced in reference 7 actually tends to carry some of the load on the AMB, while the PD controller tends to act as a controller only. The problem is that the AMB likes to center the rotor, while the JB tends to move the rotor center downwards and sideways. These two competing devices need a controller designed to carry the load on the JB and keep all the AMB power for control. Only in special circumstances (like relocating resonances) should the AMB be allowed to carry the load. The references mentioned above provide ample examples of the controller application. However, a person skilled in the art can judiciously select the appropriate control algorithm. It should be understood that the preceding is merely a detailed description of one or more embodiments of this invention and that numerous changes to the disclosed embodiments can be made in accordance with the disclosure herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The preceding description, therefore, is not meant to limit the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/597,628 filed on May 17, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/337,555, filed on May 17, 2016, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3969804 | MacInness et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4034228 | Arauner | Jul 1977 | A |
4300808 | Yoshioka | Nov 1981 | A |
4415281 | Agrawal | Nov 1983 | A |
4488826 | Thompson | Dec 1984 | A |
4526483 | Hishikawa et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4597676 | Vohr et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4767223 | Goodwin | Aug 1988 | A |
4827169 | Habermann | May 1989 | A |
4828403 | Schwartzman | May 1989 | A |
4880320 | Haines et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4961122 | Sakai et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5032028 | Riazuelo et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5096309 | Nakasugi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5201585 | Gans et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5322371 | Signoret et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5480234 | Chen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489155 | Ide | Feb 1996 | A |
5516212 | Titcomb | May 1996 | A |
5531523 | Subbiah | Jul 1996 | A |
5549392 | Anderson | Aug 1996 | A |
5634723 | Agrawal | Jun 1997 | A |
5743654 | Ide et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743657 | O'Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5772334 | Parkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5795076 | Ball et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5879085 | Ball et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6089756 | Ono et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6353273 | Heshmat | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6606536 | Aso | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6653756 | Ueyama et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6703736 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707200 | Carroll et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717311 | Locke | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720695 | Coenen | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727617 | McMullen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737777 | Werfel et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7836601 | El-Shafei | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20050275300 | El-Shafei | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080224556 | El-Shafei | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20160053807 | Maciver et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
El-Shafei et al., Controlling Journal Bearing Instability Using Active Magnetic Bearings, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Jan. 2010, vol. 132. |
Dimitri et al., Instability Control and Unbalance Compensation of Flexible Rotors Supported on Journal Bearings Using Magnetic Bearings, Proceedings of the 8th IFToMM International Conference on Rotordynamics, Sep. 12-15, 2010, KIST, Seoul, Korea. |
El-Hakim et al., Numerical and Experimental Identification of the Static Characteristics of a Combined Journal-Magnetic Bearing: Smart Integrated Bearing, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Vibratoins in Rotating Machinery, IMechE, London, UK, pp. 399-407, Sep. 11-13, 2012. |
El-Shafei et al., Test Rig Characterization and Dynamic Testing of a Smart Electro-Magnetic Actuator Journal Integrated Bearing, Mechanisms and Machine Science vol. 21, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, Proceedings of the 9th IFToMM International Conference on Rotodynamics, Sep. 22-25, 2014, Milan, Italy. |
Dimitri et al., Oil Whip Elimination Using Fuzzy Logic Controller, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Jun. 2016, vol. 138, No. 6. |
Dimitri et al., Magnetic Actuator Control of Oil Whip Instability in Bearings, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 51, No. 11, Nov. 2015. |
El-Shafei et al., PD Control of a Smart Electro-Magnetic Actuator Journal Integrated Bearing (SEMAJIB), Proceedings of the 11th IMechE International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Manchester, UK, Sep. 2016, Paper C1030, pp. 239-250. |
PCT International Searching Authority; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2017; entire document. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190234461 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62337555 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15597628 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 16376503 | US |