The present invention generally relates to integrated lancing test strips, and more specifically, but not exclusively, concerns an integrated lancing test strip with a hydrophilic sheet or flag that is shaped and structured to enhance fluid flow into the test strip as well as maintain the sterility of the test strip.
Body fluid sampling devices have been developed to draw body fluid, such as blood or interstitial fluid, from a person or animal and analyze the drawn fluid for any number of characteristics, such as blood glucose levels for diabetics. Many of these devices have been designed for home based monitoring so that an individual can monitor their condition throughout the day. In a conventional procedure, the medical practitioner or the individual first creates an incision in the skin by lancing the subject's skin with a lancet. To avoid infection of the incision site and/or contamination of the fluid collected, the lancet is sterilized and packaged in a sterile manner prior to use. Typical packaging of the lancet involves covering the tip of the lancet with a protective cap that maintains the sterility of the lancet as wells prevents subjects from accidentally cutting themselves or others with the lancet. Maintaining the sterility of the lancet while at the same time providing for ease in removal of the protective cap can be difficult, especially when the test is self-administered. Usually, the subject is either elderly or otherwise has some infirmity that reduces their hand dexterity, which in turn makes removal of the cap difficult. One solution has been to weaken the connection between the cap and the lancet, but by weakening this connection, the protective caps are more prone to be dislodged during shipping. Complicated systems have been developed to automatically remove the caps, but the caps still tend to be bulky in nature, which makes storage and disposal of the discarded caps problematic in the automatic system. Even with automatic systems, difficulties still exist in ensuring a consistent level of performance when removing the caps. Also, the bulky nature of the caps reduces the packing density of the lancets when attached together in a tape or cassette of lancets.
Usually, after lancing the skin, the individual has to manually position a test strip or a capillary tube in the drop of body fluid, but as mentioned before, this task can be difficult for many individuals, such as the elderly. The ability to draw a sufficient amount of fluid onto the test strip is always a concern, especially with home-based testing systems. When the amount of fluid is insufficient, the individual can become frustrated by having to repeatedly perform the test and waste multiple test strips. For example, if the individual is unable to steadily hold the test strip, the test strip may not collect a sufficient amount of fluid for a reliable test. Also, the user can press the test strip or the sampling device to hard against the skin so that the incision closes, thereby prematurely cutting off the fluid supply. Wicking structures have been developed to help draw fluid onto the test strip or into a capillary tube. However, it has been discovered that these wicking structures have a number of significant drawbacks. For instance, the wicking structures tend to waste fluid by requiring that a considerable amount of the fluid be absorbed by the wicking structure before transporting the fluid to the testing area on the test strip. Also, typical wicking structures are predisposed to smear the droplet of blood or other fluid on the skin, which in turn tends to waste fluid.
After the body fluid sample is collected, the sample may be analyzed for a variety of characteristics through optical and/or electrochemical analysis as well as in other manners. Integrated lancing test strips have been recently developed in which a lancet is attached to a test strip or some other type of testing media, such that the single, integrated unit can both draw and analyze body fluid. Typically, the lancet is made of metal, such as surgical grade stainless steel. In most conventional body fluid sampling devices that use electrochemical test strips, metallic lancets do not significantly affect the readings from electrochemical test strips because the lancet and the electrochemical test strip are separate and spaced relatively far apart. However, with the advent of integrated lancing test strips, it has been discovered that the small spacing between the lancet and electrodes in the test strip can create considerable electrical interference, which can affect the readings generated from the test strip. The electrical interference becomes even more pronounced as the industry tends to shrink the integrated lancing test strips for incorporation into cassettes, cartridges and other types of storage units.
Thus, there remains the need for further improvement in this field.
One aspect of the present invention concerns a device for sampling a body fluid from an incision in skin. The device includes a lancet, a test strip, and a fluid collection flag extending from the test strip for drawing bodily fluid to the test strip. Further, the fluid collection flag is flexible to bend during lancing and the fluid collection flag has a structure to minimize lateral wicking of the bodily fluid.
A further aspect concerns an integrated bodily fluid sampling device for sampling a bodily fluid from an incision in skin. The device includes a lancet with a lancet tip, a test strip coupled to the lancet, a fluid collection flag, and a protective film. The fluid collection flag extends from the test strip and the fluid collection flag draws bodily fluid onto the test strip. Further, the protective film detachably couples to the fluid collection flag to protect at least the lancet tip such that the lancet tip is sandwiched between the fluid collection flag and the film.
Another aspect concerns an integrated bodily fluid sampling device for sampling and testing a bodily fluid from an incision in skin. The device includes a lancet with a lancet tip, a test strip attached to the lancet, an insulating layer, and a fluid collection flag. The test strip has electrodes. Further, the insulating covers a portion of the lancet and prevents electrical interference between the lancet and the electrodes. The fluid collection flag is configured to draw bodily fluid onto the test strip.
Yet, another aspect concerns a method of drawing a body fluid. The method includes providing a sampling device with a fluid collection flag. The fluid collection flag is configured to minimize lateral wicking of the body fluid. The method also includes contacting a drop of the body fluid with the fluid collection flag and drawing the body fluid longitudinally along a length of the fluid collection flag with the fluid collection flag.
Another aspect concerns a method of providing a sampling device with a lancet that has a lancet tip to form an incision and a testing means to analyze body fluid from the incision. The method also includes sandwiching at least a lancet tip of the lancet between the protective film and a fluid collection flag to maintain sterility of the lancet tip. The fluid collection flag is configured to draw bodily fluid towards the testing means.
Further forms, objects, features, aspects, benefits, advantages, and embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from a detailed description and drawings provided herewith.
For the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates. One embodiment of the invention is shown in great detail, although it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that some features that are not relevant to the present invention may not be shown for the sake of clarity.
The present invention generally concerns an integrated lancing test strip that reduces the amount body fluid that needs to be drawn from an incision in tissue, such as skin. The device includes a lancet for forming the incision in the skin, a test strip or other testing device coupled to the lancet, and a flexible fluid collection sheet or flag extending from the test strip. After the lancet forms the incision, the fluid collection sheet is used to draw fluid from the incision into the test strip for analysis. The fluid collection sheet is made of flexible material so as to not close the incision when it contacts the skin, and the end of the collection sheet is shaped to reduce lateral wicking of the fluid as well smearing of the fluid, thereby increasing the amount of fluid directly transferred to the testing area in the test strip. In one form, the integrated lancing test strip includes a metallic lancet and electrodes with a reagent for analyzing the fluid. A portion of the lancet is coated or covered with a thin conformal film or coating that prevents electrical interference between the lancet and electrodes on the test strip. To maintain the sterility of the lancet, a protective, peelable film covers at least the tip of the lancet in one embodiment. An adhesive joins the peelable film to the fluid collection sheet such that the tip of the lancet is sandwiched in between.
Selected features from different embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to integrated lancing test strips of the type illustrated in the drawings, but it should nevertheless be appreciated that these features can be incorporated into other types designs. As an non-limiting example, although the illustrated integrated lancing test strips have a lancet that is fixed relative to the rest of the test strip, it should be appreciated that the lancet or other portions of the test strip can be moveable relative to the rest of the test strip. Moreover, it is envisioned that multiple integrated lancing test strips can be stored or joined together in a cartridge and/or in a cassette. For other examples of integrated lancing test strip designs, please refer to commonly owned: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/767,522 to Roe et al.; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/330,724, filed Dec. 27, 2002 published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2004/0127818 A1 on Jul. 1, 2004; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/308,463, filed Dec. 3, 2002, published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2004/0106941 A1 on Jun. 3, 2004, which are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
An integrated lancing test strip or disposable unit 30, according to one embodiment of the present invention, will now be described with reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, lancet 32 has a substantially flat shape. As should be appreciated, the lancet 32 can be various geometric shapes. For example, lancet 32 can be rounded. In this embodiment, the lancet 32 is made of metal, but it is contemplated that the lancet 32 can be made of other materials, such as plastic or ceramic, or a combination of materials, such as metal and plastic.
As shown in
As mentioned previously, during the development of integrated lancing test strips, such as the one illustrated in
As should be further appreciated, the insulating layer 34 as well as other components of the unit 30 are assembled in an layer like fashion such that multiple integrated units 30 can be easily assembled in an continuous fashion. Continuous strips or layers of these components, such as the insulating layer 34, can be sandwiched together (or poured) in a continuous fashion so that a continuous strip of the integrated units 30, which are oriented in a side-by-side fashion, can be formed. From the assembled strip, individual units 30 can be cut or the assembled strip of units 30 can remain intact for incorporation into a cassette and/or cartridge.
In the illustrated embodiment, various adhesive layers 38, 42, 46 are used to secure the components of the integrated unit 30 together. However, it should be recognized that the components can be joined together in other manners. By way of nonlimiting examples, the components of the integrated unit 30 can be joined via adhesive tape, welding and through mechanical fasteners, to name a few.
Referring to
The test strip 44 is positioned along the capillary channel 54 so that the test strip 44 is able to collect fluid drawn into the capillary channel 54. As illustrated in
As described above, the fluid collection flag 48 is used to draw the bodily fluid sample through the opening 56 and into the capillary channel 54. With reference to
Referring to
With continued reference to
It was noted above that the integrated lancing test strip 30 has been constructed to minimize the size of the fluid sample. By reducing the amount of fluid needed for testing, the penetration depth of the lancet 32 can be reduced, which results in a general reduction of pain to the user. Also, the smaller sample sizes allow fluid to be collected at less vascularized locations, such as the forearm. During sampling with typical sampling devices, not all of the fluid reaches the testing area of the test strip, which results in wasting of the fluid. Sometimes the fluid can be smeared on the skin or a portion of the fluid remains in the collection device, such as a capillary tube. In the embodiments illustrated in
With the embodiment illustrated in
In accordance with another embodiment, sampling end portion 64a, as shown in
With reference to
Referring to
A sampling end portion 64e according to a further embodiment is illustrated in
With reference to
Referring to
A sampling end portion 64h according to the embodiment illustrated in
An integrated sampling device 30 according to another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
It is envisioned that in other embodiments, the collection flag 48 can be treated or made with hydrophobic and/or hydrophilic to create areas that correspond in shape to the above described shapes of the collection sheet 48. For example, a triangular area of hydrophilic material can be formed on the collection flag 48 in order to reduce lateral wicking of the fluid. Also, it is contemplated that hydrophilic/hydrophobic areas can be used in conjunction with specifically shaped collection flags 48 so as to reduce lateral wicking and further define the fluid flow path.
Maintaining the sterility of the integrated lancing test strip 30, especially the lancet 32, is always a concern. If the lancet 32 is contaminated, infection or other serious injuries can result. In
Once the lancet tip is sterilized, the film 132 is applied over the lancet 32 and is bonded to the collection flag 48. In one embodiment illustrated in
In both illustrated embodiments, the film 132 has an end region 138 that is not coated with an adhesive. The end region 138 provides an adhesive free area for the user or a mechanical device to more easily grasp and remove the film 132 to expose the lancet 32. The film 132 is removed by grasping the end region 138 and peeling the film 132 from the lancet 32, while the collection flag 48 remains attached to the test strip 44. As should be appreciated, the flexibility of the film 132 and the type of adhesive used on the film 132 allow the film 132 to be easily removed from the lancet 32 and the collection flag 48.
It is contemplated that in other embodiments the integrated lancing test strip 30 can have a pair of films 132 such that the lancet engaging surface 134 of each pair of films 132 is coated with an adhesive. Further in this embodiment, one of the films 132 is placed over the lancet 32 and the lancet tip 50. The other film 132 is placed over the test strip 44 such that it extends from the test strip 44 and the lancet engaging surface 134 covers the lancet 32 and lancet tip 50. The lancet engaging surfaces 134 attach to each other to surround the lancet tip 50 and form a seal. In one form, the collection flag 48 is not part of the embodiment encompassing a pair of films 132. However, in another embodiment, the pair of protective films 132 are in the form of a pair of fluid collection flags 48 that remain attached to the integrated unit 30. Before use, the pair of fluid collection flags 48 are pulled apart, either manually or automatically, so that the lancet tip 50 is exposed, and once the incision is formed, both collection flags 48 are used to draw fluid onto the test strip 44.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1328459 | Smith | Jan 1920 | A |
2359550 | Eriksen | Oct 1944 | A |
2646799 | Jacoby, Jr. | Jul 1953 | A |
2801633 | Ehrlich | Aug 1957 | A |
2866542 | Svirchev | Dec 1958 | A |
2998880 | Ladd | Sep 1961 | A |
3604616 | Greif | Sep 1971 | A |
3669256 | Jacob | Jun 1972 | A |
3802842 | Lange et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
D234644 | Sugiyama et al. | Mar 1975 | S |
3910455 | Ferraro | Oct 1975 | A |
3942634 | Gandi et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3967728 | Gordon et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4061468 | Lange et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4095589 | Manschot et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4123840 | Rumer, Jr. | Nov 1978 | A |
D254444 | Levine | Mar 1980 | S |
4203446 | Hofert et al. | May 1980 | A |
4360016 | Sarrine | Nov 1982 | A |
4375815 | Burns | Mar 1983 | A |
4385692 | Eldridge, Jr. | May 1983 | A |
4462405 | Ehrlich | Jul 1984 | A |
4469110 | Siama | Sep 1984 | A |
4490465 | Limbach et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4506787 | Bruso | Mar 1985 | A |
4597493 | Bruso | Jul 1986 | A |
4627445 | Garcia et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635488 | Kremer | Jan 1987 | A |
4637403 | Garcia et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4653513 | Dombrowski | Mar 1987 | A |
4677979 | Burns | Jul 1987 | A |
4787398 | Garcia et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790979 | Terminiello et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4869249 | Crossman et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4873993 | Meserol et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4895147 | Bodicky et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4915697 | DuPont | Apr 1990 | A |
4924879 | O'Brien | May 1990 | A |
4990154 | Brown et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4997092 | Dupont | Mar 1991 | A |
5035704 | Lambert et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5100391 | Schutte et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5129511 | Brown et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5260031 | Seymour | Nov 1993 | A |
5304193 | Zhadanov | Apr 1994 | A |
5406939 | Bala | Apr 1995 | A |
5409133 | Gringer | Apr 1995 | A |
5423847 | Strong et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5529581 | Cusack | Jun 1996 | A |
5540709 | Ramel | Jul 1996 | A |
5545173 | Herbst | Aug 1996 | A |
5582184 | Erickson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5607401 | Humphrey | Mar 1997 | A |
5607437 | Simon et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613978 | Harding | Mar 1997 | A |
5628764 | Schraga | May 1997 | A |
5628765 | Morita | May 1997 | A |
5699907 | Langenstuck | Dec 1997 | A |
5699909 | Foster | Dec 1997 | A |
5730753 | Morita | Mar 1998 | A |
RE35803 | Lange et al. | May 1998 | E |
5755733 | Morita | May 1998 | A |
5776719 | Douglas et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795632 | Buchalter | Aug 1998 | A |
5798031 | Charlton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5824491 | Priest et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830225 | Detsch | Nov 1998 | A |
5857983 | Douglas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871494 | Simons et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873887 | King et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879311 | Duchon et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916230 | Brenneman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931846 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951492 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951493 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962215 | Douglas et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964718 | Duchon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971941 | Simons et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984940 | Davis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997561 | Bocker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010519 | Mawhirt et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022366 | Schraga | Feb 2000 | A |
6036659 | Ray et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036924 | Simons et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045497 | Schweich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6045567 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048352 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051293 | Weilandt | Apr 2000 | A |
6056701 | Duchon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066103 | Duchon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071250 | Douglas et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6071294 | Simons et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086545 | Roe et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099484 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143164 | Heller et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156050 | Davis et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6156051 | Schraga | Dec 2000 | A |
6159424 | Kauhaniemi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183489 | Douglas et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210421 | Bocker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6258229 | Winarta et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270637 | Crismore et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283982 | Levaughn et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299607 | Osborn, III et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306152 | Verdonk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315738 | Nishikawa et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319210 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332871 | Douglas et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346114 | Schraga | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349229 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352514 | Douglas et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364890 | Lum et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409740 | Kuhr et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419661 | Kuhr et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6561989 | Whitson | May 2003 | B2 |
6612111 | Hodges et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6706159 | Moerman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707554 | Miltner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6800488 | Khan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6866675 | Perez et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7008799 | Zimmer et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7211052 | Roe | May 2007 | B2 |
7264627 | Perez | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7322942 | Roe | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20010027277 | Klitmose | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027327 | Schraga | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037099 | Effenhauser | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039387 | Rutynowski et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002344 | Douglas et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004196 | Whitson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016006 | Wendelbo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029059 | Purcell | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040230 | Kuhr et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052618 | Haar et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082522 | Douglas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103499 | Perez et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020137998 | Smart et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160520 | Orloff et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168290 | Yuzhakov et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177761 | Orloff et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177763 | Burns et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177788 | Hodges | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018282 | Effenhauser et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028087 | Yuzhakov et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028125 | Yuzhakov et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050573 | Kuhr et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060730 | Perez | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073932 | Varey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030144608 | Kojima et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030196894 | Cai et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199744 | Buse et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211619 | Olson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212344 | Yuzhakov et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212346 | Yuzhakov et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040034318 | Fritz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055898 | Heller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064068 | DeNuzzio et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106941 | Roe | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127818 | Roe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127819 | Roe et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127929 | Roe | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186394 | Roe et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050021066 | Kuhr et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050245954 | Roe et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251064 | Roe | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277850 | Mace et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283094 | Thym et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008389 | Sacherer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060079810 | Patel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100542 | Wong et al. | May 2006 | A9 |
20060100543 | Raney et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060174592 | Chan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200045 | Roe | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229532 | Wong et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060293611 | Calasso | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016103 | Calasso | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038149 | Calasso | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070167869 | Roe | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173739 | Chan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173740 | Chan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191738 | Raney | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191739 | Roe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080097244 | Arnitz | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103415 | Roe et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161724 | Roe | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2287757 | Apr 2001 | CA |
197 53 847 | Jun 1999 | DE |
0 582 276 | Feb 1994 | EP |
1 281 352 | Feb 2003 | EP |
2000-116768 | Apr 2000 | JP |
WO 9309710 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9309723 | May 1993 | WO |
WO0040150 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0172220 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0226129 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0236010 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02056751 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03015627 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2004060174 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004064636 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004086970 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005084530 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005084545 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005084546 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005104948 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006005503 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2007147494 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060079810 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |