1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a versatile integrated multi-sensor apparatus which combines positional data from a variety of sensor types including a GNSS system. The various sensor data is ranked according to its confidence level, and using that data as a means to automatically create a planned path and steer a vehicle along that planned path. Elements of the present invention allow the system to be easily interchangeable among a multitude of vehicles and to communicate with other vehicles to allow for autonomous cooperative vehicle behavior building and task delegation.
2. Description of the Related Art
Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) guidance and control are widely used for vehicle and personal navigation and a variety of other uses involving precision location in geodesic reference systems. GNSS, which includes the Global Positioning System (GPS) and other satellite-based positioning systems, has progressed to sub-centimeter accuracy with known correction techniques, including a number of commercial satellite based augmentation systems (SBASs).
For even more accurate information, higher frequency signals with shorter wavelengths are required. It is known in the art that by using GNSS satellites' carrier phase transmissions, and possibly carrier phase signal components from base reference stations or satellite based augmentation systems (SBAS), including the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) (U.S.), and similar systems such as EGNOS (European Union) and MSAS (Japan), a position may readily be determined to within millimeters. When accomplished with two antennas at a fixed spacing, an angular rotation may be computed using the position differences. In an exemplary embodiment, two antennas placed in the horizontal plane may be employed to compute a heading (rotation about a vertical axis) from a position displacement. Heading information, combined with position, either differentially corrected (DGPS) or carrier phase corrected real-time kinematic (RTK), provides the feedback information desired for a proper control of the vehicle direction.
Another benefit achieved by incorporating a GNSS-based heading sensor is the elimination or reduction of drift and biases resultant from a gyro-only or other inertial sensor approach. Yet another advantage is that heading may be computed while movable equipment is stopped or moving slowly, which is not possible in a single-antenna, GNSS-based approach that requires a velocity vector to derive a heading. Yet another advantage of incorporating a GNSS-based heading sensor is independence from a host vehicle's sensors or additional external sensors. Thus, such a system is readily maintained as equipment-independent and may be moved from one vehicle to another with minimal effort. Yet another exemplary embodiment of the sensor employs global navigation satellite system (GNSS) sensors and measurements to provide accurate, reliable positioning information. GNSS sensors include, but are not limited to, GPS, Global Navigation System (GLONAS), Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and the like, as well as combinations including at least one of the foregoing.
An example of a GNSS is the Global Positioning System (GPS) established by the United States government, which employs a constellation of 24 or more satellites in well-defined orbits at an altitude of approximately 26,500 km. These satellites continually transmit microwave L-band radio signals in two frequency bands, centered at 1575.42 MHz and 1227.6 MHz, denoted as L1 and L2 respectively. These signals include timing patterns relative to the satellite's onboard precision clock (which is kept synchronized by a ground station) as well as a navigation message giving the precise orbital positions of the satellites, an ionosphere model and other useful information. GPS receivers process the radio signals, computing ranges to the GPS satellites, and by triangulating these ranges, the GPS receiver determines its position and its internal clock error.
In standalone GPS systems that determine a receiver's antenna position coordinates without reference to a nearby reference receiver, the process of position determination is subject to errors from a number of sources. These include errors in the GPS satellite's clock reference, the location of the orbiting satellite, ionosphere induced propagation delay errors, and troposphere refraction errors. The overall positional signal is weakened with each satellite target lost. These targets may be lost due to obstructions such as trees, hills, or merely because the satellite has orbited out of view.
To overcome these positioning errors of standalone GPS systems, many positioning applications have made use of data from multiple GPS receivers. Typically, in such applications, a reference or base receiver, located at a reference site having known coordinates, receives the GPS satellite signals simultaneously with the receipt of signals by a remote or rover receiver. Depending on the separation distance between the two GPS receivers, many of the errors mentioned above will affect the satellite signals equally for the two receivers. By taking the difference between signals received both at the reference site and the remote location, these errors are effectively eliminated. This facilitates an accurate determination of the remote receiver's coordinates relative to the reference receiver's coordinates. Additional sensors may also be used to support weak GNSS positional data, such as an inertial measurement unit which may include a gyroscope. Such additional sensors are, however, prone to lose calibration and then need to be corrected.
Differential global navigation satellite system (DGNSS) guidance utilizes a localized base receiver of known location in combination with a rover receiver on a moving vehicle for obtaining accurate vehicle positions from GNSS data. Differential positioning, using base and rover receivers, provides more accurate positioning information than standalone systems because the satellite ranging signal transmission errors tend to effect the base and rover receivers equally and therefore can be cancelled out in computing position solutions. In other words, the base-rover position signal “differential” accurately places the rover receiver “relative” to the base receiver. Because the “absolute” geo-reference location of the fixed-position base receiver is precisely known, the absolute position of the rover receiver can be computed using the base receiver known, absolute position and the position of the rover receiver relative thereto.
Differential GPS is well known and exhibits many forms. GPS applications have been improved and enhanced by employing a broader array of satellites such as GNSS and WAAS. For example, see commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,469,663 to Whitehead et al. titled Method and System for GPS and WAAS Carrier Phase Measurements for Relative Positioning, dated Oct. 22, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirely. Additionally, multiple receiver DGPS has been enhanced by utilizing a single receiver to perform differential corrections. For example, see commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,397,147 to Whitehead titled Relative GPS Positioning Using A Single GPS Receiver With Internally Generated Differential Correction Terms, dated May 28, 2002 the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
It is not uncommon to utilize a GNSS system in combination with an automatic-steering module linked to a vehicle's steering manifold through a steering controller unit. The guidance unit receives positional information from the GNSS unit and compares it with a pre-planned path or map. Because the GNSS positional information allows the guidance unit to know exactly where the vehicle is located along a path, it can use this information to automatically guide and steer the vehicle along this path.
A steering controller is required to accept instructions from the guidance unit and actually perform the steering controls on the vehicle. This device connects to the vehicle steering manifold and/or hydraulic steering valves. Signals from the guidance unit are delivered to the steering controller, which then commands hydraulic valves to open or close depending on the desired results.
Automatic steering systems using GNSS data tend to lose accuracy. If the system calibration is off the steering controller may tend to over-correct, resulting in erratic turns. Additionally, loss of the GNSS signal could affect the automatic steering function.
Disclosed herein is a method for providing accurate and precise vehicle positioning guidance and control with automatic steering capabilities. The present invention utilizes a series of separate sensors which may serve as temporary reliable guidance devices when GNSS signals are weak, and are recalibrated when GNSS signals are strong. This reliable positioning information gathering allows multiple vehicles to operate in cooperation with each other using autonomous task delegation and control. A versatile system is described that facilitates a number of precise steering tasks for a variety of functions using proportional hydraulic control and state-of-the-art GNSS positional systems.
In the accompanying drawings, which illustrate the principles of the present invention and an exemplary embodiment thereof.
I. Introduction, Environment, and Preferred Embodiment
Generally, a preferred embodiment of the present invention consists of components which allow a farming vehicle, with or without an attached farming implement, to automatically guide itself around a field and perform a plurality of functions, leading to precision farming. Said vehicle may be in constant communication with other vehicles similarly equipped for the same or different tasks. The vehicles within such a network are capable of making decisions amongst themselves about where to go and what to do to best perform assigned tasks based on the global position of each vehicle relative to each other and the location of said tasks.
The preferred embodiment or the integrated multi-sensor guidance system (guidance system) 2, as shown in
The preferred embodiment of the present invention has at least four particular applications. First, there is a command center approach that can be applied, where the guidance system is a one-time capital investment that can be moved and used with each piece of farming equipment, regardless of the season or the task being performed. Second, a highly accurate yet economical automatic steering application is available. Such an application can allow for high accuracy work to be performed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with limited stress on human drivers. The third particular application of the present invention deals with sectional control of implements; that is the guidance unit can selectively shut off portions of the working implement where overlap would otherwise occur. Finally, site-specific farming using variable rate control can be applied. Depending on the site and the crop being grown, the system can fluctuate how much work the implement does, whether that be spraying, seeding, or tilling.
II. Sensor Suite
The sensor suite 7 is comprised of a plurality of sensors, including at least a GNSS system 8, a wheel angle sensor (WAS) 16 and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) 26. Additional sensors may include a video camera unit oriented in the vehicle towards the direction of travel. For example, the video camera unit can be oriented towards a landmark on the horizon, which can provide an aiming point or point of reference corresponding to a predetermined geo-reference location. Other sensors in the sensor suite 7 can include a radar unit for ranging and direction finding, e.g., to a particular radar target. A laser unit, radio input, telemetry, and other sensor units capable of aiding in precision position and trajectory mapping can also be utilized. This suite of sensors gathers position and heading data and relay this information to the guidance unit 10 discussed in detail in section III.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the GNSS system 8 will be assigned the highest confidence level as a default, and is thus a primary and important element to this guidance system 2. Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) are broadly defined to include GPS (U.S.), Galileo (proposed), GLONASS (Russia), Beidou/Compass (China, proposed), IRNSS (India, proposed), QZSS (Japan, proposed) and other current and future positioning technology using signals from satellites, with or without augmentation from terrestrial sources. Inertial navigation systems (INS) include gyroscopic (gyro) sensors, accelerometers and similar technologies for providing output corresponding to the inertia of moving components in all axes, i.e. through six degrees of freedom (positive and negative directions along transverse X, longitudinal Y and vertical Z axes). Yaw, pitch and roll refer to moving component rotation about the Z, X and Y axes respectively. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar meaning.
Disclosed herein in an exemplary embodiment is a sensor system for vehicle guidance. The sensor system can utilize a plurality of GNSS code or carrier phase differenced antennas to derive attitude information, herein referred to as a GNSS attitude system. Moreover, the GNSS attitude system may optionally be combined with one or more rate gyro(s) used to measure turn, roll or pitch rates and to further calibrate bias and scale factor errors within these gyros. In an exemplary embodiment, the rate gyros and GNSS receiver/antenna are integrated together within the same unit, to provide multiple mechanisms to characterize a vehicle's motion and position to make a robust vehicle steering control mechanism.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a vehicle 4, an implement 6, and a sensor suite 7. The sensor suite is comprised of a plurality of sensors, containing at least a GNSS system 8, a WAS 16, and an IMU 26. Said GNSS system 8 is further comprised of a receiver 22, a differential receiver 20, a base station antenna 18, and a plurality of antennas 24 located on said vehicle 4 and implement 6. The GNSS system provides position information to the guidance unit 10. This information can be used or creating a path 64 around a field 60, establishing alternatives 72 to said path when obstacles 66 are encountered.
The sensor suite 7 will integrate all connected sensors with the ultimate result being robust tight wheel control; that is, wheel and vehicle control at a very precise level. This sensor integration implements a confidence level or reliance level checklist by which certain sensors are given higher-priority when position information is used unless those sensors are reporting weak or no signal. Higher priority sensor systems are used to recalibrate lower priority systems while said higher priority systems remain at their default signal levels. This ensures that when the higher priority systems lose signal, the lower priority systems are timely calibrated to compensate for the higher priority system for the short time period of reduced signal.
III. Guidance Unit 10
A guidance unit 10, otherwise known as an electronic control unit (ECU), can be put to several different uses on an agricultural vehicle. One common use is to provide heading data based on a pre-planned or calculated path 64. The guidance unit might have the path manually input into the unit, or it might be capable of receiving GNSS positional data and information regarding a particular piece of land and calculate a path based off of this information. The guidance unit 10 can display information to the vehicle's driver through a user interface (UI) 28 and allow the driver to manually steer the vehicle along the displayed path. A more precise application of such a guidance unit 10 is to introduce automatic steering to a farming vehicle 4. The vehicle 4 will then guide itself along said calculated or pre-planned path 64 with greater precision than manual steering could provide.
The guidance unit 10 can be put to additional uses as well, including automated implement control and advanced mapping and data management. The automated implement control comprises sectional implement control, including application rate control and variable rate control. The advanced mapping and data management, as mentioned above, includes the system's ability to take known landscape information from the GNSS system and store that information for processing during jobs. This leads to real-time map creation as the vehicle self-guides the piece of land to be worked.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention includes the sensor suite 7 mentioned above which is connected to the guidance unit 10. The guidance unit 10 interprets positional data received from the sensor suite 7 and puts it to use in several ways. The guidance unit 10 is further divided into at least a logic portion 30 and a guidance portion 32. The guidance unit receives data from the sensor suite 7, determines what to do with the data in the logic portion 30, including computing a path 64 or selectively controlling the implement, and then transmits that data through the guidance portion 32 to the steering controller 12 and the implement steering controller 50.
As demonstrated in
Once the default process 106 is begun, the loop 100 begins a sensor signal check 108. During this step, each sensor's signal is checked internally to determine whether it is communicating properly with the rest of the guidance system 2 and whether incoming signals are present. For example, the GNSS system 8 will be checked several times per second to determine the strength of the satellite signal being received by the antennas 24 and receiver 22. These sensor signal levels are then compared 110 with the default signal levels that are expected. If these detected signals are equal to or exceed the strength of the expected signal, a “yes” command is entered and the sensor signal check begins again.
If, however, the detected signal is lower than the expected default signal, a “no” command is reported and the loop 100 enters a confidence level reduction step 112 whereby the particular sensor's confidence level is reduced according to the strength of the detected signal. A confidence level comparison step 114 is then performed, comparing the updated confidence levels of all sensors in the sensor suite 7. If the result of the sensor-reliance reordering step 116 is a change in reliance levels, a “yes” command is returned and the reliance priority list is reordered at 118. This occurs when the confidence level of a particular sensor drops so low due to a weak or loss of signal that its information is no longer reliable. That sensor drops down in the reliance list and the new most reliable sensor is used to produce position and heading information until a sensor signal check 108 results in the original sensor regaining its signal and thus priority level. If the result of the sensor-reliance reordering step 116 is “no,” then the reliance list is not reordered and the confidence loop 100 returns to the sensor signal checking step 104.
This process of steps ensures that only the most reliable sensors are used to determine current vehicle position and heading and to recalibrate less reliable sensors. The listed steps are an example of such a confidence loop 100 and are not intended to be the only means to achieve the desired results. Additional or fewer steps may be used to return an appropriate confidence or reliance level list.
As an example of this process, the guidance unit 10 is connected to the steering controller 12 and the WAS 16. The guidance unit can relay correction information from the GNSS positioning system 8 to the WAS for calibration purposes. The WAS 16 is initially calibrated with a zero-heading and receives information from the steering controller 12 regarding turn data, and in turn relays actual data back to the steering controller and the guidance unit. The guidance unit knows exact position and heading information because of data received from the GNSS system 8 and other sensors high on the reliability list. By comparing the highly reliable GNSS information with the less reliable WAS information, the guidance unit can tell whether the WAS is correct or not. If it is determined that the WAS information is incorrect, the guidance unit can recalibrate the WAS and create a new zero-heading. In the alternative, if the confidence loop 100 were to determine that the GNSS system 8 had a weak signal at a particular point, the guidance unit 10 could rely on data from the IMU 26 and/or WAS 16 until the GNSS signal returns. These additional sensors are better suited for short-term accurate guidance, but quickly degrade and must be recalibrated.
IV. Steering Controller 12
The steering controller 12 is the third major component of the guidance system 2. The steering controller is designed to accept guidance inputs and transform those inputs into outputs that result in actual motion and steering of the vehicle 4.
The steering controller 12 portion of the guidance system 2 is designed to transmit and receive steering information from all associated parts and to provide the means for actually controlling the direction of the vehicle 4 based upon position and guidance data gathered by the sensor suite 7 and interpreted by the guidance unit 10. The steering controller is directly connected to the guidance unit 10, the WAS 16, the hydraulic steering manifold 14, and the implement controller 50. The steering controller 12 is the primary step for transforming data from the guidance system into actual movement of the vehicle itself.
Although the WAS 16 is part of the sensor suite 7 as discussed above, there is a direct connection between the WAS 16 and the steering controller 12. This results in a “wheel loop” whereby the steering controller 12 transmits steering commands to the hydraulic steering manifold 14 which proceeds to turn the wheels of the vehicle 4 in a direction. The angle of the turn is reported back to the steering controller, which may order further steering corrections depending on the pre-planned path 64. This angle can also reported to the guidance unit 10 where it is compared with other sensors in the confidence loop 100. Assuming another sensor, such as the GNSS system 8, is currently at the top of the reliance list, the WAS may be recalibrated if it turns out that the applied turning angle was incorrect when applied to the calculated path 64.
V. Automaton Control
The process of controlling several machines as automatons in a smart and accurate system, such as the one presented herein, is accomplished with the combination of the above-described units into a single, autonomous system allowing one system to control the positioning, guidance, and workload of a fleet of agricultural vehicles.
VI. Alternative Examples of a Guidance System 2
The above sections discuss the preferred embodiment of the invention, comprising generally a sensor suite 7, a guidance unit 10 and a steering controller 12. Several alternative methods of forming the guidance system 2 exist. A primary example is using the GNSS system 8 to completely replace the sensor suite 7, and moving the IMU 26 to the guidance unit 10. Other examples of said guidance system 2 follow.
As shown in
An integrated multi-sensor guidance system for a vehicle assembly including a steering subsystem, which guidance system includes: said vehicle assembly having a dynamic attitude comprising a geo-reference location, vehicle assembly orientation and vehicle assembly speed; a processor with multiple sensor inputs and actuator outputs; a suite of sensor units each connected to a respective sensor input.
Said sensor unit suite includes a GNSS unit with an antenna and a receiver connected to said antenna, said GNSS unit providing output signals corresponding to the GNSS-defined locations of said vehicle assembly dynamic attitude to a respective processor input.
A guidance controller is adapted for receiving signal input and generating control output based on said signal input; a data storage device including memory storage; and a suite of actuator units each connected to a respective actuator output.
Said sensor unit suite includes an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor providing output signals corresponding to an inertial aspect of a dynamic attitude of said vehicle assembly to a respective processor input.
Said guidance controller is adapted for receiving inertial measurement signals and integrating said inertial measurement signals with said GNSS-based positioning signals. Said processor is programmed to determine variable confidence levels in real time for each said sensor unit based on its current relative performance; and said processor is programmed to utilize said sensor unit outputs proportionally based on their respective confidence levels in generating said control output signals.
Said processor is programmed to define multiple behavior-based automatons comprising self-operating entities in said guidance system, said automatons performing respective behaviors using data output from one or more sensor units for achieving said behaviors and wherein one or more sensor units provide the same or similar data.
Each said automaton has an accepting interface for accepting requests from other automatons; a requesting interface for making requests to another automaton; a knowledge input for receiving a behavioral definition for affecting the behavior of the automatons; and a data input for receiving input data; and a data output for sending out the data.
Said actuator unit suite includes a steering unit connected to said steering subsystem and receiving said control output signals from said processor. Said steering subsystem includes: a steering controller including a steering processor and connected to said guidance controller. Said steering controller receives guidance signals as inputs from said guidance controller and computing steering signals as outputs from said steering controller; and said steering actuator receives said steering signals from said steering controller and steering said vehicle in response thereto.
Said sensor suite includes sensor units chosen from among the group comprising: a video camera unit oriented in the vehicle assembly direction of travel; a radar unit; a laser unit; radio input; telemetry; material application exclusion areas input; satellite image inputs; contour/elevation overlay inputs; prescription mapping; and a wheel angle sensor (WAS).
Said actuator suite includes actuator units chosen from among the group comprising: an implement steering unit, an implement sectional control unit, personal computer (PC) office software, material application rate control, secondary vehicle control, mapping, crop yield, and mapping skips and overlaps.
Said guidance controller is adapted for receiving and storing in said memory storage device GNSS-based positioning signals. Said processor is adapted for computing a GNSS-based guide pattern. Said guidance controller is adapted for providing output signals to a display device for displaying vehicle motion relative to guide patterns and contrasting displays of areas treated by said vehicle along previously-traveled portions of said guide patterns. Said guidance controller is adapted for calibrating and storing in said memory multiple vehicle profiles, each said profile including multiple, independent vehicle-specific automatons.
A method of vehicle control and guidance, comprises the steps: providing a vehicle assembly including a steering subsystem and dynamic attitude comprising a geo-reference location, vehicle assembly orientation, and vehicle assembly speed; providing a guidance system including processor with multiple sensor inputs and actuator outputs, a suite of sensor units connected to a respective sensor input, a suite of actuator units connected to a respective actuator output, and a data storage device including memory storage; providing a guidance controller; inputting signal input data to said guidance controller; and generating control output signals with said guidance controller based on said signal input.
The sensor unit suite includes an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor providing output signals corresponding to an inertial aspect of a dynamic attitude of said vehicle assembly to a respective processor input. The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes generating inertial measurement signals with said IMU sensor; receiving the inertial measurement signals with said guidance controller; and integrating said inertial measurement signals with said GNSS-based positioning signals.
The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes determining variable confidence levels with the processor in real time for each said sensor unit based on current relative performance; and utilizing said sensor unit outputs proportionally based on the respective confidence levels in generating said control output signals.
The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes defining multiple behavior-based automatons comprising self-operating entities in said guidance system; and instructing said automatons to perform respective behaviors using data output from one or more sensor units for achieving said behaviors wherein one or more sensor units provide the same or similar data.
The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes providing each automaton with an accepting interface for accepting requests from other automatons; providing each automaton with a requesting interface for making requests to another automaton; providing each automaton with a knowledge input for receiving a behavioral definition for affecting the behavior of the automatons; providing each automaton with a data input for receiving input data; and providing each automaton with a data output for sending data.
The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes providing a steering unit connected to said steering subsystem; and receiving said control output signals at said steering unit as steering control instructions. The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes providing a steering processor connected to said guidance controller; receiving guidance signals at said steering controller as inputs from said guidance controller; computing steering signals as outputs from said steering controller; receiving said steering signals with said steering actuator; and steering said vehicle assembly in response to said steering signals.
The method of vehicle control and guidance also includes determining variable confidence levels with the processor in real time for each said sensor unit based on current relative performance; and utilizing said sensor unit outputs proportionally based on the respective confidence levels in generating said control output signals.
An integrated multi-sensor guidance system for a vehicle assembly including a steering subsystem, includes: said vehicle assembly having a dynamic attitude comprising a geo-reference location, vehicle assembly orientation and vehicle assembly speed; a processor with multiple sensor inputs and actuator outputs; a suite of sensor units each connected to a respective sensor input.
Said sensor unit suite includes a GNSS unit with an antenna and a receiver connected to said antenna, said GNSS unit provides output signals corresponding to the GNSS-defined locations of said vehicle assembly dynamic attitude to a respective processor input; said sensor unit suite includes an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor providing output signals corresponding to an inertial aspect of a dynamic attitude of said vehicle assembly to a respective processor input.
Said guidance controller is adapted for receiving inertial measurement signals and integrating said inertial measurement signals with said GNSS-based positioning signals; said processor is programmed to determine variable confidence levels in real time for each said sensor unit based on its current relative performance.
Said processor is programmed to utilize said sensor unit outputs proportionally based on their respective confidence levels in generating said steering signals; a suite of actuator units are each connected to a respective actuator output; said actuator unit suite includes a steering unit connected to said steering subsystem and receiving said steering signals from said processor.
Said processor is programmed to define multiple behavior-based automatons comprising self-operating entities in said guidance system, said automatons performing respective behaviors using data output from one or more sensor units for achieving said behaviors and wherein one or more sensor units provide the same or similar data.
Each said automaton has an accepting interface for accepting requests from other automatons; a requesting interface for making requests to another automatons; a knowledge input for receiving a behavioral definition for affecting the behavior of the automatons; a data input for receiving input data; and a data output for sending out the data.
It will be appreciated that the components of the system 2 can be used for various other applications. Moreover, the subsystems, units and components of the system 2 can be combined in various configurations within the scope of the present invention. For example, the various units could be combined or subdivided as appropriate for particular applications. The system 2 is scalable as necessary for applications of various complexities. It is to be understood that while certain aspects of the disclosed subject matter have been shown and described, the disclosed subject matter is not limited thereto and encompasses various other embodiments and aspects.
This application relates to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/243,417, filed Sep. 17, 2009, filed concurrently herewith, which is incorporated herein by reference. The present application is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,649,930, issued Feb. 11, 2014, entitled: GNSS INTEGRATED MULTI-SENSOR CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD; which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/243,417, filed Sep. 17, 2009, the contents and disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3585537 | Rennick et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3596228 | Reed, Jr. et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3727710 | Sanders et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3815272 | Marleau | Jun 1974 | A |
3899028 | Morris et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3987456 | Gelin | Oct 1976 | A |
4132272 | Holloway et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4170776 | MacDoran et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4180133 | Collogan et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4398162 | Nagai | Aug 1983 | A |
4453614 | Allen et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4529990 | Brunner | Jul 1985 | A |
4637474 | Leonard | Jan 1987 | A |
4667203 | Counselman, III | May 1987 | A |
4689556 | Cedrone | Aug 1987 | A |
4694264 | Owens et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4710775 | Coe | Dec 1987 | A |
4714435 | Stipanuk et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4739448 | Rowe et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4751512 | Longaker | Jun 1988 | A |
4769700 | Pryor | Sep 1988 | A |
4785463 | Janc et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4802545 | Nystuen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4812991 | Hatch | Mar 1989 | A |
4813991 | Hale | Mar 1989 | A |
4858132 | Holmquist | Aug 1989 | A |
4864320 | Munson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4894662 | Counselman | Jan 1990 | A |
4916577 | Dawkins | Apr 1990 | A |
4918607 | Wible | Apr 1990 | A |
4963889 | Hatch | Oct 1990 | A |
5031704 | Fleischer et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5100229 | Lundberg et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5134407 | Lorenz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5148179 | Allison | Sep 1992 | A |
5152347 | Miller | Oct 1992 | A |
5155490 | Spradley et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5155493 | Thursby et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156219 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165109 | Han et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5173715 | Rodal et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177489 | Hatch | Jan 1993 | A |
5185610 | Ward et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191351 | Hofer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194851 | Kraning et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202829 | Geier | Apr 1993 | A |
5207239 | Schwitalla | May 1993 | A |
5239669 | Mason et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5255756 | Follmer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5268695 | Dentinger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5293170 | Lorenz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294970 | Dornbusch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296861 | Knight | Mar 1994 | A |
5311149 | Wagner et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323322 | Mueller et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334987 | Teach | Aug 1994 | A |
5343209 | Sennott et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345245 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359332 | Allison et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361212 | Class et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365447 | Dennis | Nov 1994 | A |
5369589 | Steiner | Nov 1994 | A |
5375059 | Kyrtsos et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390124 | Kyrtsos | Feb 1995 | A |
5390125 | Sennott et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390207 | Fenton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5416712 | Geier et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430654 | Kyrtsos et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442363 | Remondi | Aug 1995 | A |
5444453 | Lalezari | Aug 1995 | A |
5451964 | Babu | Sep 1995 | A |
5467282 | Dennis | Nov 1995 | A |
5471217 | Hatch et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476147 | Fixemer | Dec 1995 | A |
5477228 | Tiwari et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477458 | Loomis | Dec 1995 | A |
5490073 | Kyrtsos | Feb 1996 | A |
5491636 | Robertson | Feb 1996 | A |
5495257 | Loomis | Feb 1996 | A |
5504482 | Schreder | Apr 1996 | A |
5511623 | Frasier | Apr 1996 | A |
5519620 | Talbot et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521610 | Rodal | May 1996 | A |
5523761 | Gildea | Jun 1996 | A |
5534875 | Diefes et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543804 | Buchler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546093 | Gudat et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548293 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561432 | Knight | Oct 1996 | A |
5563786 | Torii | Oct 1996 | A |
5568152 | Janky et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568162 | Samsel et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583513 | Cohen | Dec 1996 | A |
5589835 | Gildea et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592382 | Colley | Jan 1997 | A |
5596328 | Stangeland et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600670 | Turney | Feb 1997 | A |
5604506 | Rodal | Feb 1997 | A |
5608393 | Hartman | Mar 1997 | A |
5610522 | Locatelli et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610616 | Vallot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610845 | Slabinski et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612883 | Shaffer et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615116 | Gudat et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617100 | Akiyoshi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5617317 | Ignagni | Apr 1997 | A |
5621646 | Enge et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638077 | Martin | Jun 1997 | A |
5644139 | Allen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646844 | Gudat et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663879 | Trovato et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664632 | Frasier | Sep 1997 | A |
5673491 | Brenna et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680140 | Loomis | Oct 1997 | A |
5684476 | Anderson | Nov 1997 | A |
5684696 | Rao et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5706015 | Chen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717593 | Gvili | Feb 1998 | A |
5725230 | Walkup | Mar 1998 | A |
5731786 | Abraham et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739785 | Allison et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757316 | Buchler | May 1998 | A |
5765123 | Nimura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777578 | Chang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810095 | Orbach et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828336 | Yunck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838562 | Gudat et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854987 | Sekine et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862501 | Talbot et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864315 | Welles et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864318 | Cosenza et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875408 | Bendett et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877725 | Kalafus | Mar 1999 | A |
5890091 | Talbot et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899957 | Loomis | May 1999 | A |
5906645 | Kagawa et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912798 | Chu | Jun 1999 | A |
5914685 | Kozlov et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917448 | Mickelson | Jun 1999 | A |
5918558 | Susag | Jul 1999 | A |
5919242 | Greatline et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923270 | Sampo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926079 | Heine et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927603 | McNabb | Jul 1999 | A |
5928309 | Korver et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929721 | Munn et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933110 | Tang | Aug 1999 | A |
5935183 | Sahm et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936573 | Smith | Aug 1999 | A |
5940026 | Popeck | Aug 1999 | A |
5941317 | Mansur | Aug 1999 | A |
5943008 | Van Dusseldorp | Aug 1999 | A |
5944770 | Enge et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945917 | Harry | Aug 1999 | A |
5948043 | Mathis | Sep 1999 | A |
5949371 | Nichols | Sep 1999 | A |
5955973 | Anderson | Sep 1999 | A |
5956250 | Gudat et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969670 | Kalafus et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987383 | Keller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014101 | Loomis | Jan 2000 | A |
6014608 | Seo | Jan 2000 | A |
6018313 | Engelmayer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023239 | Kovach | Feb 2000 | A |
6052647 | Parkinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055477 | McBurney et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057800 | Yang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061390 | Meehan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061632 | Dreier | May 2000 | A |
6062317 | Gharsalli | May 2000 | A |
6069583 | Silvestrin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070673 | Wendte | Jun 2000 | A |
6076612 | Carr et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081171 | Ella | Jun 2000 | A |
6100842 | Dreier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122595 | Varley et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128574 | Diekhans | Oct 2000 | A |
6144335 | Rogers | Nov 2000 | A |
6191730 | Nelson, Jr. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191733 | Dizchavez | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198430 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198992 | Winslow | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199000 | Keller et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205401 | Pickhard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212453 | Kawagoe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215828 | Signell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229479 | Kozlov et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230097 | Dance et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233511 | Berger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236916 | Staub et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236924 | Motz | May 2001 | B1 |
6253160 | Hanseder | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256583 | Sutton | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259398 | Riley | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266595 | Greatline et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285320 | Olster et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292132 | Wilson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307505 | Green | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313788 | Wilson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314348 | Winslow | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325684 | Knight | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336066 | Pellenc et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345231 | Quincke | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6356602 | Rodal et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377889 | Soest | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380888 | Kucik | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389345 | Phelps | May 2002 | B2 |
6392589 | Rogers et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397147 | Whitehead | May 2002 | B1 |
6415229 | Diekhans | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418031 | Archambeault | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421003 | Riley et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424915 | Fukuda et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431576 | Viaud et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434462 | Bevly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445983 | Dickson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445990 | Manring | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449558 | Small | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463091 | Zhodzicshsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463374 | Keller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466871 | Reisman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469663 | Whitehead et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484097 | Fuchs et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501422 | Nichols | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515619 | McKay, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516271 | Upadhyaya et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6539303 | McClure et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542077 | Joao | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549835 | Deguchi | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553299 | Keller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553300 | Ma et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553311 | Aheam et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570534 | Cohen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6577952 | Strother et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587761 | Kumar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606542 | Hauwiller et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611228 | Toda et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611754 | Klein | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611755 | Coffee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622091 | Perlmutter et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631916 | Miller | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643576 | O Connor et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646603 | Dooley et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657875 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671587 | Hrovat et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6688403 | Bernhardt et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703973 | Nichols | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711501 | McClure et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721638 | Zeitler | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732024 | Wilhelm Rekow et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744404 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754584 | Pinto et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774843 | Takahashi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789014 | Rekow et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792380 | Toda | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819269 | Flick | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819780 | Benson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822314 | Beasom | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6865465 | McClure | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865484 | Miyasaka et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876920 | Mailer | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6900992 | Kelly et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922635 | Rorabaugh | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931233 | Tso et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6967538 | Woo | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990399 | Hrazdera et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006032 | King et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7026982 | Toda et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027918 | Zimmerman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031725 | Rorabaugh | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7089099 | Shostak et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7142956 | Heiniger et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162348 | McClure et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191061 | McKay et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7225060 | O'Connor et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225068 | Schick et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231290 | Steichen et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248211 | Hatch et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7271766 | Zimmerman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277784 | Weiss | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7277792 | Overschie | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292186 | Miller et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7324915 | Altman et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7358896 | Gradincic et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373231 | McClure et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388539 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395769 | Jensen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7428259 | Wang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437230 | McClure et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451030 | Eglington et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454290 | Alban et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460942 | Mailer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479900 | Horstemeyer | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505848 | Flann et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522100 | Yang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7571029 | Dai et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580783 | Dix | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7689354 | Heiniger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7904226 | Dix | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8160765 | Morselli et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190337 | McClure | May 2012 | B2 |
8437901 | Anderson | May 2013 | B2 |
8649930 | Reeve et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020004691 | Kinashi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020072850 | McClure et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030014171 | Ma et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030187560 | Keller et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208319 | Ell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040039514 | Steichen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040186644 | McClure et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040212533 | Whitehead et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050080559 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114023 | Williamson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165546 | Aral | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050225955 | Grebenkemper et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265494 | Goodings | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060167600 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206246 | Walker | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215739 | Williamson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070078570 | Dai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088447 | Stothert et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121708 | Simpson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070205940 | Yang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070285308 | Bauregger et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039991 | May et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059068 | Strelow et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080129586 | Martin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195268 | Sapilewski et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204312 | Euler | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090171583 | DiEsposti | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174597 | DiLellio et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174622 | Kanou | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177395 | Stelpstra | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177399 | Park et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090259397 | Stanton | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259707 | Martin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262014 | DiEsposti | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262018 | Vasilyev et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262974 | Lithopoulos | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265054 | Basnayake | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265101 | Jow | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265104 | Shroff | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273372 | Brenner | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090273513 | Huang | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090274079 | Bhatia et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090274113 | Katz | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276155 | Jeerage et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295633 | Pinto et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090295634 | Yu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299550 | Baker | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322597 | Medina Herrero et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322598 | Fly et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322600 | Whitehead et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322601 | Ladd et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322606 | Gronemeyer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326809 | Colley et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013703 | Tekawy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026569 | Amidi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030470 | Wang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039316 | Gronemeyer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039318 | Kmiecik | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039320 | Boyer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039321 | Abraham | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060518 | Bar-Sever et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063649 | Wu | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084147 | Aral | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085249 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085253 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103033 | Roh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103034 | Tobe et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103038 | Yeh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103040 | Broadbent | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106414 | Whitehead | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106445 | Kondoh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109944 | Whitehead et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100109945 | Roh | May 2010 | A1 |
20100109947 | Rintanen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100109948 | Razoumov et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100109950 | Roh | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111372 | Zheng et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114483 | Heo et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117894 | Velde et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117899 | Papadimitratos et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117900 | Van Diggelen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124210 | Lo | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124212 | Lo | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134354 | Lennen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149025 | Meyers et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149030 | Verma et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149033 | Abraham | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149034 | Chen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149037 | Cho | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150284 | Fielder et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152949 | Nunan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156709 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156712 | Pisz et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156718 | Chen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159943 | Salmon | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161179 | McClure et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161211 | Chang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161568 | Xiao | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171660 | Shyr et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171757 | Melamed | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185364 | McClure | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185366 | Heiniger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185389 | Woodard | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188285 | Collins | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188286 | Bickerstaff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189163 | Burgi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207811 | Lackey | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210206 | Young | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211248 | Craig et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211315 | Toda | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211316 | DaSilva et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
07244150 | Sep 1995 | JP |
WO9836288 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO0024239 | May 2000 | WO |
WO03019430 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO2005119386 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2009066183 | May 2009 | WO |
WO2009126587 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2009148638 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Information Disclosure Statement, Listing of Related Cases, Aug. 2, 2016, 1 page. |
Noh, Kwang-Mo, Self-tuning controller for farm tractor guidance, Iowa State University Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, Paper 9874, (1990). |
Van Zuydam,. R.P., Centimeter-Precision Guidance of Agricultural Implements in the Open Field by Means of Real Tim Kinematic DGPS, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, pp. 1023-1034 (1999). |
Parkinson, Bradford W., et al., “Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, vol. II”, Bradford W. Parkinson and James J. Spiker, Jr., eds., Global Postioning System: Theory and Applicaitons, vol. II, 1995, AIAA, Reston, VA, USA, pp. 3-50, (1995), 3-50. |
“Orthman Manufacturing Co., www.orthman.com/htm;guidance.htm”, 2004 regarding the “Tracer Quick-Hitch”. |
Lin, Dai et al., “Real-time Attitude Determination fro Microsatellite by Lamda Method Combined with Kalman Filtering”, A Collection fof the 22nd AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit Technical Paers vol. 1, Monetrey, California American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., (May 2004),136-143. |
Xu, Jiangning et al., “An EHW Architecture for Real-Time GPS Attitude Determination Based on Parallel Genetic Algorithm”, The Computer SocietyProceedings of the 2002 NASA/DOD Conference on Evolvable Hardware (EH'02), (2002). |
Han, Shaowel et al., “Single-Epoch Ambiguity Resolution for Real-Time GPS Attitude Determination with the Aid of One-Dimensional Optical Fiber Gyro”, GPS Solutions, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 5-12 (1999) John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Park, Chansik et al., “Integer Ambiguity Resolution for GPS Based Attitude Determination System”, SICE 1998, Jul. 29-31, Chiba, 1115-1120. |
Last, J. D., et al., “Effect of skywave interference on coverage of radiobeacon DGPS Stations”, IEEE Proc.—Radar, Sonar Navig., vol. 144, No. 3, Jun. 1997, pp. 163-168. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT/US2004/015678, filed May 17, 2004, Jun. 21, 2005. |
“ISO”, 11783 Part 7 Draft Amendment 1 Annex, Paragraphs B.6 and B.7.ISO 11783-7 2004 DAM1, ISO: Mar. 8, 2004. |
Kaplan, E D., “Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications”, Artech House, MA, 1996. |
Irsigler, M et al., “PPL Tracking Performance in the Presence of Oscillator Phase Noise”, GPS Solutions, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 45-57 (2002). |
Ward, Phillip W., “Performance Comparisons Between FLL, PLL and a Novel FLL-Assisted-PLL Carrier Tracking Loop Under RF Interference Conditions”, 11th Int. Tech Meeting of the Satellite Division of the U.S. Inst. of Navigation, Nashville, TN, Sep. 15-18, 783-795, 1998. |
Bevly, David M., “Comparison of INS v. Carrier-Phase DGPS for Attitude Determination in the Control of Off-Road Vehicles”, ION 55th Annual Meeting; Jun. 28-30, 1999; Cambridge, Massachusetts; pp. 497-504. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Searching Authortiy, PCT/US08/88070, Feb. 9, 2009. |
Keicher, R. et al., “Automatic Guidance for Agricultural Vehicles in Europe”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 25, (Jan. 2000),169-194. |
Takac, Frank et al., “SmartRTK: A Novel Method of Processing Standardised RTCM Network TRK Information For High Precision Positioning”, Proceedings of ENC GNSS 2008, Toulouse, France,(Apr. 22, 2008). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/33567, (Feb. 9, 2009). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/49776, (Aug. 11, 2009). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/AU/2008/000002, (Feb. 28, 2008). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT/IB2008/003796 (Jul. 15, 2009). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/33693, (Mar. 30, 2009). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/039686, (May 26, 2009). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/34376, (Nov. 2, 2009). |
“International Search Report / Written Opinion”, PCT/US09/63594, (Jan. 11, 2010). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/60668, (Dec. 9, 2009). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US09/067693, (Jan. 26, 2010). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT/US10/21334, (Mar. 12, 2010). |
Rho, Hyundho et al., “Dual-Frequency GPS Precise Point Positioning with WADGPS Corrections”, [retrieved on May 18, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet: ,URL: http://gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/iongnss2005.rho.wadgps.pdf, (Jul. 12, 2006). |
“Eurocontrol, Pegasus Technical Notes on SBAS”, report [online], Dec. 7, 2004 [retrieved on May 18, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://vvww.icao.int/icao/en/ro/nacc/meetings/2004/gnss/documentation/Pegasus/tn.pdf>, (Dec. 7, 2004),p. 89 paras [0001]-[0004]. |
“ARINC Engineering Services, Interface Specification IS-GPS-200, Revision D”, Online [retrieved on May 18, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet<URL: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/geninfo/IS-GPS-200D.pdf>, (Dec. 7, 2004),p. 168 para [0001]. |
Schaer, et al., “Determination and Use of GPS Differential Code Bias Values”, Presentation [online]. Revtrieved May 18, 2010. Retrieved from the internet:.<http://nng.esoc.esa.de/ws2006/REPR2.pdf> (May 8, 2006). |
“International Search Report”, PCT/US10/26509 (Apr. 20, 2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61243417 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12884038 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 15041784 | US |