1. Technical Field
The present invention generally relates to switching elements and logic circuits, and in particular to switching elements that integrate nanotube switching technology, in which nanotubes provide conductive channels in switches, with field effect switching technology and logic circuits formed therefrom.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Digital logic circuits are used in personal computers, portable electronic devices such as personal organizers and calculators, electronic entertainment devices, and in control circuits for appliances, telephone switching systems, automobiles, aircraft and other items of manufacture. Early digital logic was constructed out of discrete switching elements composed of individual bipolar transistors. With the invention of the bipolar integrated circuit, large numbers of individual switching elements could be combined on a single silicon substrate to create complete digital logic circuits such as inverters, NAND gates, NOR gates, flip-flops, adders, etc. However, the density of bipolar digital integrated circuits is limited by their high power consumption and the ability of packaging technology to dissipate the heat produced while the circuits are operating. The availability of metal oxide semiconductor (“MOS”) integrated circuits using field effect transistor (“FET”) switching elements significantly reduces the power consumption of digital logic and enables the construction of the high density, complex digital circuits used in current technology. The density and operating speed of MOS digital circuits are still limited by the need to dissipate the heat produced when the device is operating.
Digital logic integrated circuits constructed from bipolar or MOS devices do not function correctly under conditions of high heat or heavy radiation. Current digital integrated circuits are normally designed to operate at temperatures less than 100 degrees centigrade and few operate at temperatures over 200 degrees centigrade. In conventional integrated circuits, the leakage current of the individual switching elements in the “off” state increases rapidly with temperature. As leakage current increases, the operating temperature of the device rises, the power consumed by the circuit increases, and the difficulty of discriminating the off state from the on state reduces circuit reliability. Conventional digital logic circuits also short internally when subjected to heavy radiation because the radiation generates electrical currents inside the semiconductor material. It is possible to manufacture integrated circuits with special devices and isolation techniques so that they remain operational when exposed to heavy radiation, but the high cost of these devices limits their availability and practicality. In addition, radiation hardened digital circuits exhibit timing differences from their normal counterparts, requiring additional design verification to add radiation protection to an existing design.
Integrated circuits constructed from either bipolar or FET switching elements are volatile. They only maintain their internal logical state while power is applied to the device. When power is removed, the internal state is lost unless some type of non-volatile memory circuit, such as EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory), is added internal or external to the device to maintain the logical state. Even if non-volatile memory is utilized to maintain the logical state, additional circuitry is necessary to transfer the digital logic state to the memory before power is lost, and to restore the state of the individual logic circuits when power is restored to the device. Alternative solutions to avoid losing information in volatile digital circuits, such as battery backup, also add cost and complexity to digital designs.
Important characteristics for logic circuits in an electronic device are low cost, high density, low power, and high speed. Resistance to radiation and the ability to function correctly at elevated temperatures also expand the applicability of digital logic. Conventional logic solutions are limited to silicon substrates, but logic circuits built on other substrates would allow logic devices to be integrated directly into many manufactured products in a single step, further reducing cost.
Devices have been proposed which use nanoscopic wires, such as single-walled carbon nanotubes (NT), to form crossbar junctions to serve as memory cells. (See WO 01/03208, Nanoscopic Wire-Based Devices, Arrays, and Methods of Their Manufacture; and Thomas Rueckes et al., “Carbon Nanotube-Based Nonvolatile Random Access Memory for Molecular Computing,” Science, vol. 289, pp. 94–97, 7 Jul., 2000.) Hereinafter these devices are called nanotube wire crossbar memories (NTWCMs). Under these proposals, individual single-walled nanotube wires suspended over other wires define memory cells. Electrical signals are written to one or both wires to cause them to physically attract or repel relative to one another. Each physical state (i.e., attracted or repelled wires) corresponds to an electrical state. Repelled wires are an open circuit junction. Attracted wires are a closed state forming a rectified junction. When electrical power is removed from the junction, the wires retain their physical (and thus electrical) state thereby forming a non-volatile memory cell.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003-0021966 discloses, among other things, electromechanical circuits, such as memory cells, using nanotube ribbons. Such circuits include a structure having electrically conductive traces and supports extending from a surface of a substrate. Nanotube ribbons that can electromechanically deform, or switch, are suspended by the supports that cross the electrically conductive traces. Each ribbon comprises one or more nanotubes. The ribbons are typically formed by selectively removing material from a layer or matted fabric of nanotubes.
For example, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003-0021966, a nanofabric may be patterned into ribbons, and the ribbons can be used as a component to create non-volatile electromechanical memory cells. The ribbon is electromechanically-deflectable in response to electrical stimulus of control traces and/or the ribbon. The deflected, physical state of the ribbon may be made to represent a corresponding information state. The deflected, physical state has non-volatile properties, meaning the ribbon retains its physical (and therefore informational) state even if power to the memory cell is removed. As explained in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003-0124325, three-trace architectures may be used for electromechanical memory cells, in which two of the traces are electrodes to control the deflection of the ribbon.
The use of an electromechanical bi-stable device for digital information storage has also been suggested (c.f. U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,149: Non-volatile memory device including a micro-mechanical storage element).
The creation and operation of bi-stable, nano-electro-mechanical switches based on carbon nanotubes (including mono-layers constructed thereof) and metal electrodes has been detailed in previous patent applications of Nantero, Inc. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,574,130, 6,643,165, 6706402; U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/915,093, 10/033,323, 10/033,032, 10/128,117, 10/341,005, 10/341,055, 10/341,054, 10/341,130, 10/776,059, 10/776,572, 10/917,794, and 10/918,085 the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties).
FIGS. 2A–C and 3A–C are schematic representations of nanotube switching element 100 of
Embodiments of the present invention provide integrated switching devices that combine nanotube (NT) switching elements with field effect semiconductor elements, including but not limited to MOS NFETs and PFETs (FETs).
According to one aspect of the invention, nanotube switching elements are integrated with field effect devices to form hybrid switching devices that are non-volatile.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device is a multi-terminal device, with a signal input terminal, at least one control input terminal and an output terminal. An integrated switching device forms and unforms a conductive channel from the signal input to the output subject to the relative state of the control input. The conductive channel includes a nanotube channel element and a field modulatable semiconductor channel element.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device is a four-terminal device with two control input terminals, a signal input terminal, and an output terminal.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device includes a nanotube switching element and a field effect device interconnected in series. The field effect device may resemble a field effect transistor. A control input node of the nanotube switching element and the gate of the field effect device are logically tied together.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device includes a nanotube switching element and a field effect device arranged to limit the leakage current.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device includes a network of nanotube switching elements and/or field effect devices.
According to one aspect of the invention, integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device are used to form logic circuits.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device is connected to a power supply and provides a pull-up device.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device is connected to ground and provides a pull-down device.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device is arranged so that a field effect transistor is proximate to the output terminal.
According to one aspect of the invention, an integrated switching device including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device is arranged so that a nanotube switching element is proximate to the signal input terminal.
According to one aspect of the invention, integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device are used to provide a device family to implement logic functions.
According to one aspect of the invention, integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device are used to provide a complementary logic scheme to implement logic functions.
According to one aspect of the invention, integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device are used to construct dual-rail single-output circuits.
According to one aspect of the invention, integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device are used to construct dual-rail dual-output circuits.
According to one aspect of the invention, integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device are used to form logic circuits to implement Boolean operations. A Boolean logic circuit includes at least one input terminal and an output terminal and a network of integrated switching elements including a nanotube switching element and a field effect device electrically disposed between the at least one input terminal and the output terminal. The network performs a Boolean transformation of Boolean signals on the at least one input terminal.
According to one aspect of the invention, circuits using integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect transistor have driving capabilities comparable to CMOS.
According to one aspect of the invention, circuits using integrated switching devices including a nanotube switching element and a field effect transistor are CMOS compatible.
Embodiments of the invention provide switching elements with a conductive channel that has both a nanotube component and a field effect semiconductor component. Preferred embodiments of the invention provide integrated hybrid logic devices that use nanotube switching elements in combination with field effect devices resembling field effect transistors (FETs). The integrated devices are referred to herein as NT-FET devices. The NT-FET devices of preferred embodiments form an NT-FET device family. The devices in the NT-FET device family can be used as switching elements and to implement any desired logic function or logical device, such as an inverter. In certain embodiments, an NT-FET device includes a MOSFET, e.g., a p-channel FET (PFET) or an n-channel FET (NFET), placed in series with a nanotube switching element connected to a source (VDD or GND). In preferred embodiments, the gate of the FET is logically tied to a control input of the nanotube switching element. In some embodiments, the source may also be a signal such as an output from other logic. More complex integrated NT-FET devices may include an FET network and/or a nanotube switching element network, rather than a single nanotube switching element and a single FET. The NT-FET devices may exhibit certain desirable characteristics, such as the ability to drive different types of circuits, including CMOS circuits, and low leakage currents. In preferred embodiments, the NT-FET devices are non-volatile.
The non-volatile NT-PFET device 10 includes a non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 and a PFET device 30. The construction and operation of non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 is described in more detail below. In preferred embodiments, the conductive channel element of non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 is formed of a porous nanotube fabric. Non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 has an input electrode, which is the input signal contact for the nanotube channel element. The input electrode of non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 forms the signal input terminal 25 of NT-PFET device 10, which is connected to VDD . The non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 output is connected to the source of PFET device 30 at common terminal 35. Non-volatile nanotube switching element 20 also has a control structure, including two control input terminals, for controlling the channel formation of the switching element. The control input terminals are referred to herein as a control or set electrode and a release electrode. The set electrode of non-volatile nanotube switch 20 is connected to the gate of PFET device 30 to form a common control node at control input terminal 40, which is activated by input AT. Control input terminal 40′ is connected to the release electrode of switch 20, and is activated by input AC, the complement of input AT. The drain of PFET device 30 forms the output of non-volatile NT-PFET device 10 at node 45.
The non-volatile NT-NFET device 50 includes a non-volatile nanotube switching element 60 and a NFET device 70. The construction of non-volatile nanotube switching element 60 is similar to that of nanotube switching element 20 and is described in more detail below. In preferred embodiments, the conductive channel element of non-volatile nanotube switch 60 is formed of a porous nanotube fabric. Non-volatile nanotube switch 60 has an input electrode, which is the input signal contact with the nanotube channel element. The input electrode of non-volatile nanotube switch 60 forms the signal input terminal 55 of NT-NFET device 50, which is grounded. The non-volatile nanotube switching element 60 output is connected to the source of NFET device 70 at common terminal 75. Non-volatile nanotube switching element 60 also has a control structure with two control input terminals for controlling the switching of the element. The set electrode of non-volatile nanotube switching element 60 is connected to the gate of NFET device 70 to form a common node at control input terminal 80′, which is activated by input AT. Control input terminal 80 is connected to the release node of switching element 60, and is activated by input AC. The drain of NFET device 70 forms the output of non-volatile NT-NFET device 50 at output terminal 85.
Release electrode 112 is made of conductive material and is separated from nanotube channel element 115 by an insulating material 119. The channel element 115 is separated from the facing surface of insulator 119 by a gap height G102.
Output electrodes 113a,b are made of conductive material and are separated from nanotube channel element 115 by insulating material 119.
Output electrodes 113c,d are likewise made of conductive material and are separated from nanotube channel element 115 by a gap height G103. Notice that the output electrodes 113c,d are not covered by insulator.
Control electrode 111 is made of conductive material and is separated from nanotube channel element 115 by an insulating layer (or film) 118. The channel element 115 is separated from the facing surface of insulator 118 by a gap height G104.
Signal electrodes 114a,b each contact the nanotube channel element 115 and can therefore supply whatever signal is on the signal electrode to the channel element 115. This signal may be a fixed reference signal (e.g., VDD or Ground) or varying (e.g., a Boolean discrete value signal that can change). Only one of the electrodes 114a,b need be connected, but both may be used to reduce effective resistance.
Nanotube channel element 115 is a lithographically-defined article made from a porous fabric of nanotubes (more below). It is electrically connected to signal electrodes 114a,b. The electrodes 114a,b and support 116 pinch or hold the channel element 115 at either end, and it is suspended in the middle in spaced relation to the output electrodes 113a–d and the control electrode 111 and release electrode 112. The spaced relationship is defined by the gap heights G102–G104 identified above. For certain embodiments, the length of the suspended portion of channel element 115 is about 300 to 350 nm.
Under certain embodiments the gaps G103, G104, G102 are in the range of 5–30 nm. The dielectric on terminals 112, 111, and 113a and 113b are in the range of 5–30 nm, for example. The carbon nanotube fabric density is approximately 10 nanotubes per 0.2×0.2 um area, for example. The suspended length of the nanotube channel element is in the range of 300 to 350 nm, for example. The suspended length to gap ratio is about 5 to 15 to 1 for non-volatile devices, and less than 5 for volatile operation, for example.
Under preferred embodiments, the nanotube switching element 100 of
By properly tailoring the geometry of nanotube switching element 100, the nanotube switching element 100 may be made to behave as a non-volatile or a volatile switching element. By way of example, the device state of
The nanotube switching element 100 operates in the following way. If signal electrode 114 and control electrode 111 (or 112) have a potential difference that is sufficiently large (via respective signals on the electrodes), the relationship of signals will create an electrostatic force that is sufficiently large to cause the suspended, nanotube channel element 115 to deflect into mechanical contact with electrode 111 (or 112). (This aspect of operation is described in the incorporated patent references.) This deflection is depicted in
By using appropriate geometries of components, the switching element 100 then attains the closed, conductive state of
In contrast, if the relationship of signals on the electrode 114 and control electrode 111 is insufficiently different, then the nanotube channel element 115 is not deflected and no conductive channel is formed to the output electrode 113. Instead, the channel element 115 is attracted to and physically contacts the insulation layer on release electrode 112. This OPEN (OFF) state is shown in
If the voltage difference between the control electrode 111 (or 112) and the channel element 115 is removed, the channel element 115 returns to the non-elongated state (see
Preferably, if the switching element 100 is designed to operate in the non-volatile mode, the channel element is not operated in a manner to attain the state of
The output node 113 is constructed to include an isolation structure in which the operation of the channel element 115 and thereby the formation of the channel is invariant to the state of the output node 113. Since in the preferred embodiment the channel element is electromechanically deflectable in response to electrostatically attractive forces, a floating output node 113 in principle could have any potential. Consequently, the potential on an output node may be sufficiently different in relation to the state of the channel element 115 that it would cause deflection of the channel element 115 and disturb the operation of the switching element 100 and its channel formation; that is, the channel formation would depend on the state of an unknown floating node. In the preferred embodiment this problem is addressed with an output node that includes an isolation structure to prevent such disturbances from being caused.
Specifically, the nanotube channel element 115 is disposed between two oppositely disposed electrodes 113b,d (and also 113a,c) of equal potential. Consequently, there are equal but opposing electrostatic forces that result from the voltage on the output node. Because of the equal and opposing electrostatic forces, the state of output node 113 cannot cause the nanotube channel element 115 to deflect regardless of the voltages on output node 113 and nanotube channel element 115. Thus, the operation and formation of the channel is made invariant to the state of the output node.
To facilitate the description of such circuits and to avoid the complexity of the layout and physical diagrams of
In
Referring again to
In operation, the output signal provided on output terminal 45 of NT-PFET device 10 is controlled by input signal AT (on control input terminal 40) and its complement AC (on control input terminal 40′). When AT is high: (1) both the set electrode (connected to terminal 40) and the nanotube channel element within nanotube switching element 20 are high, and nanotube switching element 20 remains off; and (2) PFET 30 has a high voltage on its gate (connected to terminal 40) and also remains off. Note that since nanotube switching element is not conducting, it acts as a valve and can reduce standby leakage currents in FET 30. When AT is low: (1) the set electrode is low but the nanotube channel element within nanotube switching element 20 is high, and nanotube switching element 20 turns on; and (2) PFET 30 has a low voltage on its gate and also turns on. When AT is low, NT-PFET device 10 is ON and the voltage at output terminal 45 is VDD. The integrated NT-FET devices and associated structures and logic circuits of the preferred embodiments offer a solution to the CMOS power dissipation problem. There is no significant leakage current between input and output terminals in the “OFF” state of the nanotube switching element, and there is no junction leakage. The use of nanotube switching elements in series with FETs limits the leakage currents in such integrated devices. The nanotube switching element 20, 60 contained within each device 10 and 50 provides a low leakage path when turned off (with power supply still on) even if FET devices 30 and 70 have high OFF-current leakage. The nanotube switching elements may operate in harsh environments such as elevated temperatures, e.g., 150 to 200 deg-C. or higher.
Similarly, the output signal provided on output terminal 85 of NT-NFET device 50 is controlled by input signal AT (connected to control input terminal 80′) and its complement AC (connected to control input terminal 80) When AT is low: (1) both the set electrode (connected to terminal 80′) and the channel element within nanotube switching element 60 are low, and nanotube switching element is off; and (2) NFET 70 has a low voltage on its gate (connected to terminal 80′) and also remains off. When AT is high: (1) the set electrode is high but the channel element within nanotube switching element 60 is low, and nanotube switching element 60 turns on. When AT is high, NT-PFET device 60 is ON and the voltage at output terminal 85 is GND.
In preferred embodiments, NT-FET devices 10 and 50 are sized so that they are non-volatile. The nanotube switching element 20, 60 contained within each device 10, 50 provides a non-volatile element that retains the state of the device when power to the device 10, 50 is removed or interrupted. Thus, NT-FET devices 10 and 50 can be used to perform logic operations when activated, preserve the logic state in a non-volatile mode when powered down and resume operations from the preserved state, without any additional steps or circuitry for saving or restoring the logic states. Alternatively, NT-FET devices 10 and 50 may be sized so that they are volatile.
The NT-FET devices 10 and 50 are integrated at the device level. NT-FET devices 10 and 50 may be operated in a dual-rail differential fashion and can be used as the basic building blocks to provide a non-volatile complementary hybrid NT-FET logic family. NOT and NOR circuits can be formed using techniques described herein and known logic design principles and used be used to implement any logical function.
This hybrid logic family exhibits desirable characteristics of both MOS and NT components. As noted above, this hybrid logic family retains the drive capabilities of conventional CMOS. Operation of the NT-FET devices 10 and 50 as building blocks for a non-volatile dual-rail differential logic family can be further understood by reference to the inverter circuits depicted in
In operation,
In operation,
An additional advantage of the hybrid NT-FET device family is illustrated in
The switching behavior of some embodiments of NT-FETs has been described in detail herein. NT-FETs can be arranged as pull-up or pull-down structures. These pull-up and pull-down structures can be arranged into gates and larger circuits such as Boolean logic circuits. NOR gates and other logic gates can be constructed using NT-FETs using the layouts discussed in the related, incorporated patent references, together with the present disclosure and conventional pull-up/pull-down techniques from conventional CMOS.
It will also be appreciated that additional implementations or types of NT-FET switching devices can be developed by interconnecting networks of non-volatile switching elements and networks of FETs. While the specification has offered specific examples of the schematic layout of a dual-rail single-output inverter and a dual-rail dual-output inverter, it will be appreciated that the NT-FET building blocks of preferred embodiments may be used to derive a complete logic family that can be used to implement any logical function. It is well known to construct circuits with networks of pull-up and pull-down elements, e.g., CMOS circuits. This technology can also be used to implement latches and other storage devices. The technology can be used in all present memory devices such as DRAM, SRAM, Flash, EEPROM, PROM, ASICs, etc. Also, all logic functions such as microprocessors, controllers, digital signal processors, adders, ramdom logic, PLAs, FPGAs, etc. can be fabricated with this invention. Preferred embodiments of NT-FET devices are compatible with MOS technology and are compatible with MOS at the block or function level. NT-FET devices also enable embedding combined nanotube-based logic and MOS circuits in new and existing MOS (and/or nanotube logic) designs at the individual circuit level.
The devices and articles shown in the preceding embodiments are given for illustrative purposes only, and other techniques may be used to produce the same or equivalents thereof. Furthermore, the articles shown may be substituted with other types of materials and geometries in yet other embodiments. For example, the nanotube switching elements may have any suitable architecture. Architectures of nanotube switches preferred for use in embodiments of the present invention are discussed in U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/917,794 and 10/918,085, which are incorporated by reference herein. Although the NT-FET devices are described herein primarily as four-terminal devices, various embodiments may have different configurations. For example, if the nanotube switching element component of an NT-FET device does not have a release electrode, then the NT-FET device may be only a three-terminal device, with only one control input terminal. In various embodiments, the devices may incorporate networks of nanotube switches and/or networks of field-modulatable switches. Any suitable integrated architecture may be used and the use of nanotube or field modulatable switching components with discrete architectures as components is not a limitation of the invention. Certain embodiments may incorporate an electrically conductive channel having a nanotube channel element and a field modulatable semiconductor channel element without using discretely identifiable nanotube and field modulatable switch architectures.
The inventors envision additional configurations of volatile and nonvolatile or mixed nanoelectromechanical designs depending upon the specific application, speed, power requirements and density desired. Additionally the inventors foresee the use of multiwalled carbon nanotubes or nanowires as the switching element of contact points within the nanotube switches. As the technology node decreases in size from 90 nm to 65 nm and below down to the size of individual nanotubes or nanowires the inventors foresee adapting the basic electromechanical switching elements and their operation to a generation of nanoscale devices with scaleable performance characteristics concomitant with such size reduction. It will also be appreciated that the invention is not limited to the use of carbon nanotubes.
The following patent references refer to various techniques for creating nanotube fabric articles and switches and are assigned to the assignee of this application. Each is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of the equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Pat. Apl., Ser. No. 60/581,015, filed on Jun. 18, 2004, entitled Nonvolatile Carbon Nanotube Logic (NLOGIC) and CMOS Inverter, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to the following applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/917,794, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled Nanotube-Based Switching Elements, now Publication No. 2005/0035367;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,085, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled Nanotube-Based Switching Elements With Multiple Controls, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,990,009;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,181, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled Nanotube Device Structure And Methods Of Fabrication, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,071,023;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/917,893, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled Nanotube-Based Switching Elements And Logic Circuits, now Publication No. 2005/0035787;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/917,606, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled Isolation Structure For Deflectable Nanotube Elements, now Publication No. 2005/0035344;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/033,087, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, entitled Nanotube-Based Transfer Devices and Related Circus, now Publication No. 2005/0279988;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/033,213, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, entitled Receiver Circuit Using Nanotube-Based Switches and Transistors, now Publication No. 2005/0282515;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/033,215, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, entitled Receiver Circuit Using Nanotube-based Switches and Logic, now Publication No. 2005/0282516;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/033,216, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, entitled Nanotube-based Logic Driver Circuits, now Publication No. 2005/0280436;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/032983, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, entitled Storage Elements Using Nanotube Switching Elements, now Publication No. 2006/0044035; andU.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/032823, filed on Jan. 10, 2005, entitled Tri-State Circuit Using Nanotube Switching Elements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4044343 | Uchida | Aug 1977 | A |
4979149 | Popovic et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5414654 | Kubota et al. | May 1995 | A |
5578976 | Yao | Nov 1996 | A |
5677823 | Smith | Oct 1997 | A |
5682345 | Roohparvar et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5818748 | Bertin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5903010 | Flory et al. | May 1999 | A |
6097241 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097243 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128214 | Kuekes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159620 | Heath et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160230 | McMillan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183714 | Smalley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198655 | Heath et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221330 | Moy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232706 | Dai et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6345362 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346846 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348700 | Ellenbogen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353552 | Sample et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6373771 | Fifield et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376787 | Martin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423583 | Avouris et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426687 | Osborn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445006 | Brandes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6518156 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6548841 | Frazier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559468 | Kuekes et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574130 | Segal et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597048 | Kan | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625047 | Coleman, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625740 | Datar et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643165 | Segal et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661270 | Nagata | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673424 | Lindsay et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6706402 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706566 | Avouris et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741334 | Asano et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750471 | Behune | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759693 | Vogeli et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760245 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774052 | Vogeli et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781166 | Lieber et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784028 | Rueckes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6794914 | Sani et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803840 | Hunt et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809465 | Jin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835591 | Rueckes et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835613 | Schlaf | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6884734 | Buehrer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6919740 | Snider | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946410 | French et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955937 | Burke et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6968486 | Matsushima | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969651 | Lu et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6986962 | Oyanagi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990009 | Bertin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015500 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7054194 | Liaw et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071023 | Bertin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20010023986 | Mancevski | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020130311 | Lieber et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130353 | Lieber et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020172963 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173083 | Avouris et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175390 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179434 | Dai et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018630 | Indeck et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021141 | Segal et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021966 | Segal et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022428 | Segal et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030124325 | Rueckes et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124837 | Rueckes et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132823 | Hyman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030165074 | Segal et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177450 | Nugent | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198812 | Rueckes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199172 | Rueckes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200521 | DeHon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206436 | Eaton et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030234407 | Vogeli et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236000 | Vogeli et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023514 | Moriya et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075125 | Asao | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075159 | Vogeli | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077107 | Vogeli | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085805 | Segal et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087162 | Vogeli | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099438 | Arthur et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040159833 | Rueckes et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164289 | Rueckes et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175856 | Jaiprakash et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181630 | Jaiprakash et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191978 | Rueckes et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198030 | Buehrer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214366 | Segal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214367 | Segal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040238907 | Pinkerton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007002 | Golovchenko et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035344 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035367 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035786 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035787 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036365 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037547 | Bertin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041465 | Rueckes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041466 | Rueckes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047244 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052894 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053525 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056825 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056866 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056877 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058590 | Sen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058797 | Sen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058834 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059176 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059210 | Rueckes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062035 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062062 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062070 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063210 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063244 | Bertin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065741 | Segal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068128 | Yip | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074926 | Bertin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101112 | Rueckes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128788 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139902 | Jung | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141266 | Jung | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141272 | Jung | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162896 | Jung | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174842 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191495 | Rueckes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237781 | Bertin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050269553 | Sen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269554 | Sen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270824 | Bertin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279988 | Bertin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280436 | Bertin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281084 | Rueckes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282515 | Betin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282516 | Bertin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060044035 | Bertin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061389 | Bertin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125033 | Segal et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060128049 | Jaiprakash et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183278 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193093 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204427 | Ghenciu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231865 | Bertin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237805 | Bertin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250843 | Bertin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250856 | Bertin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255834 | Ward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276056 | Ward et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015303 | Bertin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0103208 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0144796 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 03091486 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 04065655 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 04065657 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 04065671 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060061389 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60581015 | Jun 2004 | US |