This disclosure is generally related to device fabrication, and in particular fabrication of integrated native metal oxide discrete elements, which can advantageously be used to fabricate a discrete dynode electron multiplier (DDEM) by creating dynodes with a native oxide as secondary electron emissive (SEE) layer for use in electron multiplication process. The dynodes are machined from a metal block that comprises: a metal base component, namely Al, Al alloys or BeCu, and metal oxide SEE materials, namely Al2O3 or BeO, advantageously eliminating the need of a costly and time-consuming processing of applying an SEE coating on the dynode surface, and for aluminum alloys advantageously offering an intrinsic &pant to provide a higher secondary electron yield than the aluminum oxide.
An electron multiplier is a device based on avalanche effect through electron multiplication, made possible by use of high secondary electron emissivity materials such as Al2O3, BeO, SiO2 and MgO.
The electrons are multiplied after impacting the surface. This effect produces more secondary electrons and the process repeats itself after multiple surfaces creating the avalanche effect, the basis of electron multiplier devices.
This avalanche through multiple surface interactions is sustained by properly designed electric field between consecutive surfaces. The electric field provides favorable electron collisional energy to generate secondary electrons (SEE) and efficient electron trajectories (ion optics) to another target surface.
The process is repeated as necessary to achieve a certain total number of electrons. This principle is valid for both continuous and discrete dynode electron multiplier. In the case of DDEM, electron trajectories ion optics are determined by the electric field defined by the shape or geometry and position of the individual dynode in a dynode array. Detail operation has been widely described in the literature, and some constructions have been disclosed.
The basic application of electron multiplier is to detect high energetic neutral particles, charged particles, high energy photons or photons in general with certain use of photocathode at the device input.
Both types, continuous and discrete dynode electron multiplier, are available commercially with their own unique fabrication methods. Further attention will be given to the construction of discrete dynode electron multiplier.
As illustrated in
The above described sheet based manufacturing process has been used to manufacture DDEM for the commercial market. Clearly, this approach does not offer cost effectiveness in manufacturing in terms of labor, quality, substantial number of inventories, error in assembling by operators, assembling high precision tooling/fixtures, etc. Furthermore, applying an SEE coating on the surface of the metal sheet dynode significantly increases the cost. It is worth noting that sheet based manufacturing process places substantial limitations the ability to precisely shape the dynodes and on the precision of dynode location due to restrictions inherent in metal sheet forming technique and restrictions inherent in mounting techniques, respectively.
Disclosed herein is an integrated native oxide device-based technology which allows the fabrication of an electron multiplier suitable for low cost manufacturing while maintaining high device performance desired by the users. This “coating-less” technology allows for endless flexibility in design, fabrication, and mounting.
There are few secondary electron emissive materials, Al2O3, BeO, SiO2, and MgO that are stable in air and suitable for electron multiplier use. To avoid the need for a costly emissive layer coating, dynode metal base is advantageously selected to be the same as the metal oxide component, the metal oxide which advantageously serves as an electron emissive layer. Aluminum, alloys of aluminum, and BeCu are therefore suitable materials for the dynode raw material since for each of these materials a native emissive layer can be grown simply by oxidation through a heating process (e.g. dry heating; wet heating with steam) in the presence of oxygen (e.g., oxygen, air). Furthermore, aluminum alloys offer intrinsic dopant, particularly magnesium, which in oxide form possess higher secondary electron emission yields than aluminum oxide. The choice of the dopant concentration depends on the particular aluminum alloys series, which varies from a fraction of a percent to several percent (6%).
Endless flexibility in design and fabrication of an DDEM is achieved by building the dynodes by machining from a block of raw material (e.g., aluminum, aluminum alloys, or BeCu). This process allows production of dynodes of a virtually unlimited number of geometries or shapes as suitable for various different applications. For instance, dynodes can be designed and machined to achieve any one or more of: a miniaturization of the device, a wider shape of the dynode(s) to accept ion ribbon profile, a large surface area of the dynode(s) for high ion detection efficiency, a high dynamic range and lifetime, or simply for low cost applications.
A dynode array can be completely formed from a single block of raw material in two separate arrays or a single unified twin array.
Some implementations can decouple the native grown SEE region and the ion optics region within the dynode. The native grown SEE part can be part of a cartridge which would mount into an ion optics structure. Single or double cartridge configurations are possible by design, to form a pair of emissive electron array across from each other.
Some implementations can assemble individual full dynodes into a structure to form a DDEM as is the case for conventional DDEMs. However, in this implementation, the fabrication advantageously does not require an SEE coating on the dynode surfaces since an SEE layer is naturally grown from the material block by a heating process under oxygen or air or by other methods.
Gain enhancement dopants, such as cesium, can be added to the robust native SEE surface. Though, in the presence of an emissive layer coating, precaution must be given to the doping process, in order to avoid coating damage, which in turn would lower the device manufacturing yield. Several fabrication examples based on this principle are described here.
For a high performance DEM fabrication, a dynode array can be formed by bonding aluminum, aluminum alloys, or BeCu block into ceramics or a ceramic with metallic layer, for instance Direct Bonded Copper (DBC), Direct Bonded Aluminum (DBA) or glass materials. Various bonding processes such as brazing, soldering, and fusion (for glass materials) may be suitable, however a process modification introduced to accommodate the differences in coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the metal and the ceramics or glass. Varieties of glass materials snatching specific metal CTEs are available and commonly used in hermetic sealing applications. The metal block (e.g., aluminum, aluminum alloys or BeCu) then is machined to form dynode shape, positioned and separated to become individual functional dynodes in an array structure. Electrical discharge machine (EDM) is a suitable stress-free cutting technique to achieve high precision shape and positioning of the individual dynodes in the array structure, and which translates to best electron transmission of the DDEM and hence higher device performance. The separation process is designed such that electrical insulation is created between individual dynodes for electrical biasing as required to operate an electron multiplier device.
Alternatively, spot welding (e.g., by means of laser or resistive techniques) can be employed to bond DBC or DBA to the metallic block of aluminum, alloys of aluminum, or BeCu. Note that DBC and DBA represent a configuration of a standard thin metal-ceramic-thin metal. Furthermore, the thin metal material may be selected based on its suitability for the spot welding process with an aluminum block, alloys of aluminum block, or BeCu block.
After dynode array formation, the activation process produces native metal oxide SEE layer based on the raw aluminum, aluminum alloys or BeCu. Standard oxidation with all various enhancement such as doping could be applied.
A DDEM can be built from a pair of dynode arrays facing each other and at least one electric network (passive and/or active electrical network) that provides an electrical bias on individual dynode. The electrical network may be carried by or incorporated in at least one side wall.
Due to this “coating-less” approach, entire dynodes can be machined from a single block with a single side bonding to, for example, a ceramic, DBC, or DBA. This produces inherent alignment of all DDEM elements (input dynode, multiple dynodes, anode). A single side wall containing any electric network (e.g., passive and/or active networks) to provide electrical bias on individual dynode may be provided to produce the electron multiplier. Advantageously, no special alignment is needed for the electric network side wall.
Another construction of a DDEM can be executed by, fundamentally, separating the dynode emissive surface features from the dynode ion optic features to form a single/double cartridge which mounts onto the ion optics structure. The aluminum, aluminum alloys, or BeCu block bonded to ceramics, DBC, DBA, or glass, as mentioned above, can be used to build the dynode emissive parts. In this implementation, the metallic blocks are simpler features providing the function of a native secondary electron emitter or simply called a “cartridge”. The ion optic function is then integrated into side wall structure to finally form the ion optic structure. A single wall or two walls can be designed to hold the ion optics structure. One of the walls carries or contains an electric network which form part of the DDEM device. This construction can employ a united pair of emissive plates or a separated pair of emissive plates. Such can be advantageously designed as replacement part, being the only part that needs to be replaced to extend the life time of the DDEM beyond its nominal life time, obviating the need for replacement of the whole device. Therefore, it offers cost incentive to end users for consumable replacement of the DDEM.
Another fabrication method is simply machining individually the full dynodes (with the ion optic geometry) from a block of aluminum, block of aluminum alloys or block BeCu. The machining is followed by an activation process to grow a native metallic oxide as an SEE layer prior to assembly of the final designated structure of the DDEM. The designated structure is designed to accommodate easy and precise assembly of the individual dynodes, eliminating operator error in the process, as desired by manufacturers. The principal of individually assembling dynodes can be expanded to thin aluminum and thin aluminum alloys sheets, formed to specific geometries due to the fact that there is no SEE layer coating operation required. Some aluminum alloys, for example 2000 and 6000 series aluminum allows, can be heat treated to stiffen the dynode structures when forming technique, instead of machining, is preferred in the dynode shaping. Therefore, this technique can replace stainless steel dynode constructions where depositing an SEE coating is required. Individual aluminum dynodes can be assembled into printed circuit board (PCB) that are commonly available for electronic circuits, such as standard PCB FR4, DBC, DBA, and laminated ceramic PCBs. Bonding can be performed by soldering or brazing techniques suitable for use with aluminum.
A width of dynodes with a planar symmetry can be extended for applications that detect ions with a wide or ribbon profile. This form is achieved easily by machining a block of aluminum, aluminum alloys, or BeCu to form a dynode, in contrast to forming such from a thin metal sheet.
With this technique, it is possible to manufacture cylindrical dynode array design, for instance, manufacturing of a coaxial electron multiplier (COAXEM). Some of the potential advantages include:
1. COAXEM increases the emissive surface allowing for larger dynamic range while maintaining compact shape and form:
2. COAXEM increases the transmission due to the elimination of the side walls which exist in the planar designs:
3. COAXEM eliminates the alignment restriction as the is mounted on the same axis as the ejected ions:
4. COAXEM can be used with no High energy dynode with a leading outer ring dynode; and
5. COAXEM Allows the integration of the high energy dynode with no added cumbersome structure with a leading inner ring dynode.
Another method to fabricate DDEM is simply machining metal material to include Interconnect Metallic Material (IMM) between dynodes. The BIM can be aluminum, aluminum alloys, or BeCu. IMM is fashioned at an initial phase of fabrication and kept throughout the following processes, including surface activation and final assembly. After assembly, the IMM is removed which electrically frees at last the adjacent dynodes from each other's. IMM has two major advantages. The first advantage is allowing the machining of adjacent dynodes with a high inter-location precision, thanks to the structural property of the IMM. The second advantage is eliminating invasive jigs to EDM machine the dynode shapes thanks to the electrical property of IMM, the jigs which might otherwise reduce yield and/or increase machining costs.
Post-Activation Bonding Assembly (PABA) may be applied between an insulator and the dynode array metal block after surface activation and before IMM removal. PABA advantageously allows for further assembly simplification while maintaining dynode-to-dynode high setting precision and the overall structural integrity. Due to the low temperature PABA process, in contrary to high temperature pre-activation brazing, PABA is a much lower cost option. The above-mentioned merits of PABA facilitates highly reliable DDEM assembly with improved performance and lower cost.
A high energy dynode is a metallic part shaped to attract charged particles and direct emitted charged secondaries particles toward an electron multiplier, enhancing high-mass charged particle detection efficiency.
Clearly of the approaches for fabrication of DDEM described herein allow for highly flexible DDEM designs, suitable to manufacture the device. The approaches described herein allow for free style designs, dictated by the specific requirements of numerous applications and at the same time design for manufacturing (DFM) can be accommodated in the design intent.
In at least one implementation, a fabrication of a discrete dynode electron multiplier (DDEM) starts with bonding a metal block of aluminum (Al), Al alloys or beryllium copper (BeCu) to a single ceramic, direct bonded copper (DBC) or direct bonded aluminum (DBA) plate with a cut out or opening. This cut out or opening provides an access for dynode machining for formation of geometrical ion optics on the metal block. Electric Discharge Machine (EDM) is suitable for creating the cut out due to its high precision and due to its lack of stress on the metal during the cutting process. In this machining stage, the dynode ion optics parts, the input end, the anode, the intended dynode region for native grown SEE, the electrical isolation inter-spacing between dynodes, and the critical spacing between upper and lower dynode arrays are established. (The terms “upper” and “lower” are used herein and in the claims only for convenience, to refer to the relative positions of elements within a given illustration, based on the orientation of a given drawing sheet. Such is not intended and should not be interpreted as requiring one element to be positioned relatively above or below another element.) The metal block of Al, Al alloys, or BeCu may be pre-machined to accommodate certain features to simplify the EDM cutting and the bonding process. Various bonding process may be suitable, for example brazing, spot welding (laser or resistive type), or soldering.
A fabrication of the DDEM 200 starts with a block of a metal on which a native oxide can be grown (e.g., Al, Al alloys or BeCu). The metal block, which may be a single metal block, is physically coupled or attached to a single ceramic, DBC, or DBA substrate or plate that serves as the frame 22. The metal block is physically coupled or attached to a single ceramic, DBC, or DBA substrate or plate via any variety of techniques or structures, including but not limited to soldering, bonding, adhering (e.g., high temperature adhesive), clamping, riveting, fastening, etc. The two dynode arrays 200b, 200c are then machined from the metal block, preferably from a single metal block. This inherently self-aligns, self-positions, self-orients, self-spaces, and otherwise fixes the alignment, position, orientation and spacing between the dynodes 21 of each dynode array 200b, 200c fixed relative to one another. The machining may take a variety of forms, although EDM may be preferred. The resulting structure is then exposed to oxygen or an oxygen containing environment and heated to grow a native oxide on the exposed surfaces of the dynodes 21 of both dynode arrays 200b, 200c. Finally, the side wall may be mounted to the resultant single unit dynode component 200a.
The construction of the single unit dynode component 200a is highly advantageous in manufacturing, for example, with the alignment, position, orientation and spacing between the dynodes 21 of each dynode array 200b, 200c fixed relative to one another by being manufactured from a single block of material, eliminating the later need for alignment. The EDM the dynodes 21 of both dynode arrays 200b, 200c from a single block of material ensures that all dimensions are precise, including spacing between the upper and lower arrays. Such is made possible by the technique of growing a native oxide grown on the structure, whereas metallization of the opposed faces of the dynodes 21 of the opposed dynode arrays 200b, 200c is impractical. In this respect, metallization typically employs a beam which should face (e.g., perpendicular to) the surface being metallized. This is impractical or even impossible given the tight spacing between the opposed dynode arrays 200b, 200c when machined from a single piece of material or when two opposed dynodes, one from each dynode array 200b, 200c, are machined from a single piece of material. This may also advantageously avoid any need to form slots in the insulative substrate (e.g., single ceramic, DBC, or DBA substrate or plate).
The dynodes 21, 28 of the integrated single unit dynode component 200a can be can be oxidized to generate a native oxide SEE. For example, the integrated single unit dynode component 200 can be subjected to a heating in air process to generate the native oxide SEE (e.g., Al2O3 from base metal Al). After oxidation, the integrated single unit dynode component 200a can be assembled together with a side wall 25 to form the DDEM 200. The elimination of a coating or process operation (e.g., deposition) allows reduction of a spacing between the upper array and lower array, advantageously facilitating miniaturization of the DDEM 200. This approach which employs generation of a native oxide SEE advantageously avoids a costly and complicated SEE coating process operation.
As best illustrated in
Side wall 45 carries an electric network 30, anode connection 46, and a high voltage node or point of contact 47 and provides the structural integrity of the DDEM 400. A second side wail 40 may be included for additional mechanical stability. As best illustrated in
This form of DDEM 400 where two ceramic, DBC, or DBA plates are used to hold the upper and lower arrays of dynodes can be built by separating the dynode ion optic structure, including input end and anode, from the dynode SEE region. The dynode SEE region component held by the plate constitutes a cartridge, therefore two cartridges are employed to form the illustrated DDEM 400. As will be apparent from this disclosure, the ion optic structure is integrated into at least one side wall 45, 40, the side wall 45 carrying an electrical network 30. The second side wall 40 may help to stabilize the mechanical structure.
Individual dynodes which include both an ion optic feature and SEE native grown oxide can be manually assembled to create an array of dynodes. This method still offers more advantages as compared to conventional approaches where each individual dynode is formed from metal sheet bending techniques. For example, machining offers virtually endless flexibility in dynode shaping as compare to metal bending, offers increased precision and higher tolerances in machining than metal bending, offers more flexible in designing the assembly process, etc.
As best illustrated in
Due to the flexibility in machining dynodes from Al, Al alloys, or BeCu material, where native oxide SEE can be grown from the base metal, this technology enables the formation of a cylindrically symmetry dynode or array of cylindrically symmetry dynodes. The benefits of the cylindrical dynode shape have been mentioned herein.
As best illustrated in
In some implementations, a high energy cylindrical dynode can simply be added before an input end of the cylindrical symmetry DDEM 700. For example,
Individual dynodes 901, Inter-metallic material (IMM) 902, input end 903, and output end 904 are machined from a single unitary block of metal, for example aluminum, aluminum alloys, or BeCu. Each individual dynode 901 in the array of dynodes 901 is connected to one another by IMM 902. Such advantageously high precision in inter-dynode position, and also advantageously eases DDEM assembling process. The design shown in
As best illustrated in
As best illustrated in
This method of assembling is not limited to integrated native oxide devices (INODs), but it can be applied to other metals such as stainless steel where SEE layer can be added as required.
This application incorporates by reference the teachings of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 62/716,185, filed Aug. 8, 2018, in its entirety.
From all of the exemplary disclosed DDEM fabrication implementations described herein, it is evident that this fundamental technology offers advantages for flexibility in dynode shaping with high precision fit for implementing various designs driven by specific end use applications and by manufacturability considerations.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/042438 | 7/18/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/033119 | 2/13/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4143291 | Morales | Mar 1979 | A |
4668890 | Swingler | May 1987 | A |
5680008 | Brandes et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
20130240907 | Jackman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150187550 | Hirano | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150235825 | Nagata et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170352515 | Hosea et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20190164734 | Kobayashi | May 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/042438, dated Oct. 31, 2019, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/042438, dated Oct. 31, 2019, 8 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 dated Oct. 8, 2021 in corresponding Australian Application No. 2019317273, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210358730 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62716185 | Aug 2018 | US |