Reference is made to commonly assigned copending patent application Ser. No. 10/674,135 filed herewith entitled “Method For Postage Evidencing For The Payment Of Terminal Dues” in the names of Erik Monsen, Ian A. Siveyer, Marc Morelli, Yakup J. Igval, John C. Harmon and Ronald P. Sansone; Ser. No. 10/674,134 filed herewith entitled “Method For Postage Evidencing With Cross-Border Mail Tracking Capability and Near Real Time for Terminal Dues Reconciliation” in the names of Ronald P. Sansone and Erik Monsen; and Ser. No. 10/673,794 filed herewith entitled “Method For Postage Evidencing For The Payment Of Terminal Dues Using Radio Frequency Identification Tags” in the names of Ronald P. Sansone and Erik Monsen.
The invention relates generally to the field of mailing systems and, more particularly, to methods for paying for international business reply mail.
The Universal Postal Union has a complex system that administers contracts between member post offices relating to terminal dues paid between and among different post offices. Terminal dues are the payments made between national postal administrations to cover the costs of handling and delivering international mail. Rates are established by the Universal Postal Union, and through bilateral and multilateral agreements. Typically, a post office will charge another post office for the delivery of mail to a recipient within its jurisdiction. For instance, if mail is sent from the United States to the United Kingdom, the United States post office will deliver the mail to the Royal Mail, and the Royal Mail will deliver the mail to the recipient. At the end of a predetermined time, the United States post office and the Royal Mail will tabulate, by weight, all of the mail each post office delivered for the other post office and calculate how much money one post office owes to the other post office.
Business mailers prepare and process various types of business mail utilizing inserters to collate the sheets and stuff the same into envelopes. Invoices, advertisements for the purchase of goods and/or services, prepaid post cards as well as business reply, i.e., business reply envelopes, business reply cards. Business reply sometimes is placed in outer envelopes mailed by business mailers to customers. Recipients of business mailers' mail may enclose a check and invoice and/or an advertisement order form in the business reply mail and mail it via the United States Postal Service (USPS) to the business mailer. Business mailer recipient customers may also mail the enclosed business reply card back to the business mailer.
The USPS allows a business mailer to receive first class business reply permit mail from their customers and pay postage and a fee only for the mail returned to the mailer from the original distribution of the mailing. Postage and fees are collected when the mailer picks up the permit business reply mail at their local USPS office.
One of the disadvantages of the above procedure is that it does not accurately determine the services performed by each post office.
An additional disadvantage of the prior art is that a postage meter could not be used for the payment of international business reply mail.
This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by making it easier for various post offices to calculate and collect accurately terminal dues by providing information to each post office regarding each piece or parcel of mail that crosses an international border. The invention also permits the post offices to calculate terminal dues for international business reply mail by utilizing a postage meter and a data center.
The foregoing may be accomplished by having a mail piece mailed in the United States containing a metered business return mail piece insert that is delivered to a destination in the United Kingdom, where the mailer's postage meter will place a USPS postal indicia on the mail piece for that portion of the delivery cost that is attributable to the United States post office and a Royal Mail replica postal indicia on the mail piece for that portion of the delivery cost that is attributable to the Royal Mail. The mail piece will also contain an indication on the front of the mail piece that the mail piece contains a business reply mail piece. The mailer's postage meter will also notify a data center located in the United States that the mail piece has been metered for the correct international mail values for mail being deposited in the United States and delivered in the United Kingdom. As the mail approaches the United States border, the face of the mail is scanned and interpreted, and the interpreted data is sent to a United States data center which transmits data to a United States meter payment data center that accumulates the United States postage payment for that meter and periodically sends the payments to the carrier's and/or post office bank. The United States meter data center also informs the United Kingdom meter data center of the future delivery of the previously metered mail to the United Kingdom along with a report of the amount of postage attributable to the Royal Mail, the unique identification that identifies the mail and notification that future business reply mail may be sent from the United Kingdom. When mail arrives in the United Kingdom, it is scanned so that the mail unique identification and amount of postage on the face of the mail will be interpreted and forwarded to the United Kingdom data center.
At the United Kingdom data center, the data will be stored and in turn forwarded to the Royal Mail meter payment data center, which notifies the Royal Mail to continue to deliver the mail to the recipient. The United Kingdom data center will inform the Royal Mail payment center that the mail is in the United Kingdom, and that it will receive funds from the United States meter payment data center. The Royal Mail data center also informs the United States data center of the delivery of the mail piece, providing confirmation to the original mailer (sender), and also “closes the loop” between the two international post offices and the sender/recipient. The Royal Mail meter payment center accumulates funds and periodically sends the funds to the Royal Mail bank.
When the recipient opens the mail and decides to return the enclosed business reply mail to the mailer (sender), the recipient deposits the business reply mail with the Royal Mail. The Royal Mail sorts and routes the business reply mail to the postal border exit office. At the postal border exit office, the business reply mail is scanned, and the payment data is extracted from the business reply mail and sent to the United Kingdom data center.
At the Royal Mail data center, the data will be stored and in turn forwarded to the United Kingdom meter payment data center, which notifies the Royal Mail to continue to process the business reply mail and to collect the postage indicated in the Royal Mail indicia affixed to the business reply mail. The Royal Mail data center will inform the Royal Mail payment center that the mail is leaving the United Kingdom, and that it will receive funds from the United States meter payment data center for the amount of postage indicated in the Royal Mail indicia affixed to the business reply mail. The Royal Mail data center also informs the United States data center of the delivery of the business reply mail, providing confirmation to the original mailer (sender), and also “closes the loop” between the two international post offices and the sender/recipient. The United Kingdom meter payment center accumulates funds and periodically sends the funds to the Royal Mail bank that it receives from the meter payment data center.
The business reply mail will be delivered to the United States where a postal entry scanner reads the USPS indicia on the business reply mail. The read data will be sent to the USPS meter data center. The USPS meter data center will receive and store the data and initiate the amount of payment indicated in the USPS postal indicia in the business reply mail to the United States meter payment data center, which in turn sends funds to the USPS bank. The business reply mail moves to the postal sorting and routing process and ultimately delivered to the original mailer. At the same time that the sortation process is happening, indicia data is being cancelled and forwarded to the original mailer as a status update of the incoming business reply mail.
An advantage of this invention is that it provides more accurate reporting and checking of the amount of international mail. Thus, each post office receives the correct revenue for the amount of mail that it processes.
Referring now to the drawings in detail, and more particularly to
It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that mail 21 may not be sent to Mr. John Smith, and Mr. John Smith receives business reply mail 41 in a magazine or business reply mail 41 within a product.
It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that business reply mail 41 may be produced by interfacing PC meter 131 (
Postal terminal dues processor 140 is coupled to archive 108, national, international and terminal dues data base 141, finance 142, and archives 108 and 113. Processor 140 will poll archive 108 and archives 113 in other lands 111 (United Kingdom, France, German, Japan, etc.) and utilize data base 141 to determine the value of the mail processed by the receiving countries from the sending countries. Then processor 140 will determine how much money each country will receive for delivering mail 21. The amounts of money will be described in the description of
In step 104, the mail is collected and rated at various post office recording stations using data capture techniques and processed by the accepting post office in step 105. As part of the mail accepting procedures in step 105, indicia 20 and 31, bar codes 30 and 31 and unique number 19 are examined and compared to data in data base 102 to determine whether the indicia 20 and 31, bar codes 30 and 31 and unique number 19 used are legitimate. When unique number 19 is issued for postal indicia 20 and 31, the issuance of unique number 18 is reported to the “all issued indicia records national data base” 102, where a record is created, capturing the issued unique number 19 for a particular mailer account number. The record is a proof of validity of postal indicia 20 and 31 having an issued unique number for a particular mailer account number, and the proof is provided when data base 102 is consulted.
In the acceptance process, a code reader is used to identify the unique number 18 and account number on indica 20 and 31. It is understood that, if any portion of indicia 20 and 31, bar codes 30 and 31 and unique number 18 is produced with an invisible ink, a special light source will be needed to make the indicia 20 and 31, bar codes 30 and 31 and unique number 18 visible to the code reader. The identified indicia 20 and 31, bar codes 30 and 31 and unique number 19 is reported to data base 102, and a proof of validity of indicia 20 and 31, bar codes 30 and 31 and unique number 18 is requested. If data base 102 has a record showing the issuance of the unique number 19 for the particular meter account serial number used and that the unique number 19 has not been canceled, then indicia 20 and 31 are considered legitimate. In that case, indicia 20 and 31 have passed the verification process, and the mail is accepted for further processing, with indicia 20 and 31 being canceled in step 105. It is preferred that the cancellation mark is produced with a visible ink in a manner that a “canceled” postal indicator is easily distinguishable from an unused one, and that a “cancelled” postal indicator” will still be able to be read.
When indicia 20 and 31 bearing a unique number 19 for a particular user meter account serial number are canceled in step 105, a request is made to data base 102 to alter the record that is specifically related to the unique number 19 being canceled. The altered record will contain the date and time of cancellation, the cost of the selected services derived from the weighing of the mail, and no longer provide a proof of validity when data base 102 is consulted. The cost for mailing the mail determined in step 105 will be charged to the mailer's meter 130 or 131. The mailer cost information will be transmitted to data center 132 via data base 102 and controller 133.
However, if the acceptance procedures in step 105 fail to yield a proof of validity of indicia 20 and 31, the mail will be sent to rejected mail process 106 where the mail will be returned to the sender or placed in the dead mail file.
The mail that step 105 determines has legitimate indicia 20 and 31 is sent to step 107 for internal sorting and routing from place to place. Step 107 will note the date and time the mail is at each step in the process. The foregoing information will be sent to archive 108 and mail processing controller 134. Then the physical mail is delivered nationally in step 109 or delivered internationally in step 110. Nationally, at the recipient's delivery post office, the mail will be scanned during the last sorting process where the date and time of sorting as well as other information identifying the mail, i.e., unique number 19, will be captured and stored in archive 108. At the last facility before the mail is transferred internationally in step 110, the mail will be scanned where the date and time of sorting as well as other information identifying the mail, i.e., unique number, will be captured and stored in archive 108.
At this point, the physical mail will be delivered to other lands 111. Then the mail will go to step 112 for sorting, routing and acceptance in the country in which the recipient is located. Step 112 will note the date and time the mail is at each step in the process. The foregoing information will be sent to archive 113. Then the physical mail is delivered nationally in step 114. At the international recipient's delivery post office, the mail will be scanned during the last sorting process where the date and time of sorting as well as other information identifying the mail, i.e., unique number, will be captured and stored in archive 113.
Step 165 stores the valid mail route and fees file and any new bar codes and indicia graphics it receives from data center 132, and then transmits the valid mail route and fees file and indicia graphics to decision block 152. Decision block 152 determines whether the operator accepts the information from data center 132. If the operator does not accept the information, the program goes to block 65. Block 65 clears buffer 154A, and then the program goes back to block 150. If the operator accepts the information, the valid mail route file is transferred to buffer 166. Step 157 reads the valid mail route and fees file in buffer 166. Step 158 takes the valid mail route and fees file and computes and buffers all fees, carrier bar codes required indicia and special service graphics plus makes a note of the maximum number of business reply mail pieces that may be returned, i.e., number 16 (
Items 201-219 are transmitted to remote data center 132 where they are processed. Data center 132 returns a validated mail route file complete with computed postal fees which are stored in buffer 166.
Mail 41 will be sorted, routed and transferred by the Royal Mail in 181, and the delivery status of mail 41 will be sent to United Kingdom data center 184. Any mail 41 that has an expiration date 52 that is after Oct. 31, 2003, will be outsorted in block 187. Mail 41 that is not outsorted will be sent to Royal Mail postal border scanner 180 where mail 41 will be scanned. Scanner 180 will read the unique identification number 60 and the amount of postage on the face of mail 41 so that number 60 and the amount of postage will be interpreted and forwarded to United Kingdom Data Center 184. At the same time, the United Kingdom Data Center 184 notifies the USPS meter data center 132 that mail 41 is arriving. As mail 41 approaches the United States border 173, the face of mail 41 is scanned and interpreted by postal entry scanner 178, and the interpreted data is sent to United States Postal Service meter data center 132, which transmits data to USPS meter payment data center 170 and United Kingdom Data Center 184. Data Center 184 transmits this data to United Kingdom meter payment data center 185. Mail 41 will be processed by the postal sort and deliver process 107 and delivered to the owner of meter 130, 131. Data Center 132 will inform meter 130, 131 that mail 41 has been processed. United States data center 132 will maintain the accuracy of the terminal dues rates by accessing terminal dues data center 175. Data center 170 accumulates the United States postage payment for that meter and periodically sends the payments to the USPS bank 172. The United States meter payment data center 170 also informs the United Kingdom of the delivery of mail 41 to the United States along with a report of the amount of postage attributable to the Royal Mail and the unique identification number or code 60 (
The above specification describes a new and improved method for paying for international business reply mail. It is realized that the above description may indicate to those skilled in the art additional ways in which the principles of this invention may be used without departing from the spirit. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4999481 | Baer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5459670 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5554842 | Connell et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5612889 | Pintsov et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5978781 | Sansone | Nov 1999 | A |
6130613 | Eberhardt et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6430543 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6526393 | Fredman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6701304 | Leon | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741178 | Tuttle | May 2004 | B1 |
6865558 | Pierce et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6978248 | Walker et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7058581 | Young | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7120610 | Brookner et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
20020073040 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030009351 | Wade | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014375 | Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030093389 | Critelli et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105704 | Sundel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115162 | Konick | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040012486 | De Souza et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064422 | Leon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040215480 | Kadaba | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 022 065 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 313 068 | May 2003 | EP |
WO 02061999 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050071288 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |