Embodiments described relate to mud pumping and cement pumping equipment and applications for completion of hydrocarbon wells. In particular, embodiments of offshore hydrocarbon wells, techniques for their completion and completion equipment such as the noted pumping equipment are described.
Exploring, drilling, and completing hydrocarbon wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. This may be especially true in the case of certain drilling and completion operations where the configuration or environment of the operation or production site presents added challenges.
In the case of offshore, and certain other drilling operations, the operating environment may pose several natural challenges dramatically affecting the expense of operations. In the case of offshore drilling, measures are often taken to curtail expenses such as keeping equipment and space for equipment to a minimum. That is, for a given offshore operation, any increase in the amount or types of equipment required, as well as the necessary accommodations therefor, comes with a fairly dramatic increase in offshore set up and operating expenses. In certain circumstances expenses may be saved by limiting the equipment employed. However, even with certain sacrifices made in terms of equipment choices, available footspace remains at a premium in offshore operations.
Regardless of the premium on available footspace at an offshore platform, like most drilling rigs, an offshore drilling rig generally includes both a mud circulation assembly and a cementing assembly along with a host of other drilling equipment. These assemblies in particular, are alternatingly employed in completing an underground well and providing a casing therefor. That is, as a drill bit is advanced downward to form and extend a borehole below ground, the mud circulation assembly is employed to both provide fluid and remove debris with respect to a location near the advancing bit. Once the borehole has been drilled to the desired depth by the drill bit, mud circulation is temporarily stopped with the drill bit and associated drilling pipe brought back to the surface. A section of borehole casing may then be advanced down into the borehole. Once the borehole casing is properly positioned and the mud circulation terminated, the cementing assembly may be operated to pump a cement slurry through the borehole, securing the borehole casing in place. This process may then be repeated until a well of the desired depth has been completed. That is, further drilling, mud circulation, and advancing of additional borehole casing, may continue, periodically interrupted by subsequent cementing and securing of the casing as described.
In the above method of well completion two different types of fluid, mud and cement slurry, may be present within the borehole depending on what stage of the operation is in effect. However, these fluids serve entirely different purposes. The mud is circulated through the borehole with the purpose of lubricating, cooling, and furthering the advancement of the drill bit. On the other hand, cement is introduced to the borehole with the purpose of stabilizing the borehole casing in a secure and final position. Thus, the introduction of either of these fluids at the wrong time may be of dire consequence to the proper completion of the well. For example, the presence of no more than about 1%-3% mud at a location for cementing may prevent the cement slurry from setting and forming a proper bond between the borehole casing and the wall of the borehole at that location. Alternatively, cement contaminants within the mud during drilling may impede drilling and stop the advancement of borehole casing altogether. Either of these circumstances are likely to have severe consequences, perhaps requiring a shut down of the entire operation for re-drilling at a new location, likely at a cost of several hundred thousand dollars if not more.
Given the potential catastrophic consequences of cement slurry or mud contamination at the improper stage of well completion, the mud circulation assembly and the cementing assembly are separately maintained and isolated from one another on the rig. Thus, the mud circulation assembly, operating 90%-97% of the time during active drilling operations, is operated from one location on the rig with multiple high horsepower prime movers, pumps and other equipment. When the time for cementing approaches, mud circulation is terminated and from a separate cementing room of the rig, the above described cementing assembly is operated, employing its own comparatively lower horsepower prime movers, pumps, and associated equipment. While understandable in light of the potential consequences of contamination as described above, in the case of an offshore rig, this maintenance of entirely separate assemblies and associated equipment comes at a significant cost to already scarce footspace.
A pump assembly is provided for delivering mud and cement slurry to a borehole. The pump assembly includes a prime mover coupled to a mud pump. A cement pump is coupled to one of the prime mover and the mud pump itself to deliver the cement slurry to the borehole.
Embodiments are described with reference to certain offshore hydrocarbon completion or production facilities such as a semi-submersible rig. However, other types of offshore production facilities including jack-up rigs, and barge rigs may employ embodiments described herein. Furthermore land based completion or production facilities may employ such embodiments. Regardless, embodiments described herein may be employed to reduce the total equipment required for a well completion operation, thereby providing savings in terms of capital cost, certain operational inefficiencies, footspace, and total equipment weight. As such, embodiments described herein may be especially of benefit for offshore operations.
Referring now to
Space and weight savings as noted above may ultimately reduce operational costs and provide other advantages to a well completion operation. For example, as shown in
Continuing now with reference to
As shown in
As a result of the above-described coupling, the cement pumping equipment 225 of the embodiment shown does not require a cement prime mover 127 as does the prior art embodiment of
In addition to the benefit of the above noted increase in available footspace 201, other advantages may be obtained from eliminating the cement prime mover 127 of
Continuing with reference to
Continuing with reference to
As shown in
Conventional cementing equipment 125 atop a skid base 122, as shown in
Continuing with reference to
Use of hydraulic coupling lines 250 to couple the pumps 128, 154 as indicated above also allows the cementing equipment 225 to be somewhat remotely located relative to the prime mover 153. That is, the inherent power transfer capacity of conventional hydraulics are such that use of hydraulic coupling lines 250 such as those shown would allow placement of the hydraulically compatible pumps 128, 154 at about any location on a conventional offshore rig 101 relative to one another. Thus blueprints for configurations of conventional rigs with relatively unaffiliated pumping equipment need not be drastically modified in order to accommodate embodiments described herein that employ coupled pumping equipment as indicated.
Continuing with reference to
Operation of the pump assembly 200 is directed from a single unitary completion control unit 255 as opposed to multiple control units disbursed throughout the rig 101. In addition to directing mud pumping operations, the completion control unit 255 is configured for coupling to cement pumping equipment 225 for directing a cementing application as described further below. In the embodiment shown, a tower 110 interfaces the platform 175 of the rig 101 at a central location. The tower 110 may be employed to support a variety of tools for forming or accessing a borehole 197 therebelow. Such access may be for well completion as detailed further below, for well production, or a variety of well access applications.
The rig 101 includes a submersible portion 180 configured to support the platform 175 above water 190 at all times. The submersible portion 180 or other parts of the rig 101 may be anchored, tethered, or otherwise secured to the floor 195 of the ocean or other body of water 190. The effectiveness of anchoring the submersible portion 180 in particular may be improved to a degree by elimination of substantially massive equipment there-above such as any cement prime movers 127 (see
Referring now to
Continuing with reference to
As described above, drilling while employing the circulating mud 300 provides lubrication and a degree of cooling to the grinding bit 350. The circulation of the mud 300 also allows for the removal of cuttings and debris as the borehole 197 extends deeper below the floor 195. In the embodiment shown, such mud circulation and drilling are directed from a completion control unit 255. Once a given depth of the borehole has been reached, the completion control unit 255 may be employed to cease the indicated circulation of mud 300 and retract the drilling pipe 325. Thus, cementing of a section of borehole casing 185 may ensue. As described with added reference to
Referring now to
In one embodiment the above-described cement pump 128 operates at between about 200 Hp and about 800 Hp, preferably at about 300 Hp as supplied by the mud pump 154 in order to direct the cement slurry 400 as indicated. Between about 1,500 and about 15,000 PSI may be generated in this manner for driving the cement slurry 400 as shown. Additionally, a cement mixer 129 may be driven at low pressure in advance of, or during, the driving of the cement slurry 400 into the borehole 197. In fact, in one embodiment, the cement mixer 129 may be driven by the cement pump 128. Again, in such an embodiment, powering of the cement pump 128 for such tasks is achieved via the coupling of the cement pump 128 to the mud pump 154 through the hydraulic coupling lines 250.
As indicated above, the same completion control unit 255 that is employed in directing mud circulation may be employed in directing the described cementing. Thus, some equipment space in the cementing room 220 may be saved. However, even more significantly, the configuration of the pump assembly 200 itself is such that the described cementing application may proceed without use of a dedicated cementing prime mover such as that of the prior art (see the prime mover 127 of
As indicated above, removal of the dedicated cementing prime mover may be achieved by driving the cement pump 128 with the mud pump 154. As shown in
In the above described embodiments, mud pumping equipment 150 and cement pumping equipment 225 have been linked together for the sake of streamlining well completion and reducing the total equipment required for the process. However, this is done in such a manner as to maintain isolation of mud 300 from cement slurry 400. That is, rather than employ a single pump such as the mud pump 154 for directly driving both the circulation of mud 300 and the driving of a cement slurry 400, a separate pump such as the cement pump 128 is retained as part of the pump assembly 200. In this manner, the circulation of mud 300 remains physically isolated from the driving of the cement slurry 400. Thus, the risk of contamination with cement slurry 400 during drilling or with mud 300 during cementing is not increased by employment of embodiments of the pump assembly 200 as described herein. Nevertheless, a significant amount of equipment (e.g. the cement prime mover 127 of
Referring now to
Unlike a conventional pump assembly as described above with reference to
As noted, embodiments of pump assemblies described herein for use in a well completion operation are employed in a manner that avoids the potential catastrophic consequences of cement slurry or mud contamination at the improper stage of well completion. The pump assemblies described retain substantially isolated mud circulation and cement slurry applications while including strategically coupled mud pumping equipment and cement pumping equipment. Thus, a single integrated well completion assembly is provided with a reduced amount of equipment, total weight of equipment, and required footspace for equipment, all without risking the possibility of the indicated contamination.
Although exemplary embodiments describe a particular integrated well completion assembly including a pump assembly at a semi-submersible rig, additional embodiments are possible. For example, a host of alternative types of rigs may be employed in addition to land based well completion assemblies. Additionally, for sake of explanation, embodiments are primarily described with reference to pump equipment including a single pump and/or prime mover. However, the pump equipment provided may actually include multiple pumps or prime movers. For example, multiple cement pumps may be coupled to multiple mud pumps or more directly to their multiple prime movers in order to provide an embodiment of a pump assembly as alluded to above. Furthermore, many changes, modifications, and substitutions may be made without departing from the scope of the described embodiments.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/805,693, filed on Jun. 23, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2194054 | Peterson | Mar 1940 | A |
2282597 | Archer | May 1942 | A |
3435906 | Nicolson | Apr 1969 | A |
3891037 | Well | Jun 1975 | A |
3976148 | Maus et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4178142 | Schwing | Dec 1979 | A |
4191513 | Schwing | Mar 1980 | A |
4341508 | Rambin, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4611973 | Birdwell | Sep 1986 | A |
4634352 | Austin | Jan 1987 | A |
4703813 | Sieler | Nov 1987 | A |
4880365 | Austin | Nov 1989 | A |
4899832 | Bierscheid, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
5289877 | Naegele | Mar 1994 | A |
5344570 | McLachlan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5580166 | Schmittchen | Dec 1996 | A |
6048132 | Kupke et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048135 | Williford et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056071 | Scott et al. | May 2000 | A |
6228153 | Saitoh | May 2001 | B1 |
6505691 | Judge | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6904982 | Judge | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7004730 | Williams | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7096948 | Mosing | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20060196695 | Giroux et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239834 | Larson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080260545 | Frokjaer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20160334300 | Hilpert | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9925608 | May 1999 | WO |
03001062 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2005088131 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
56.0931MX—Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2011. |
Office Action issued Sep. 6, 2013 for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200780019895.1, Agent's English Translation provided, 11 pages total. |
Foreign Agent's English translation of third office action issued Mar. 22, 2013 for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200780019895.1, 12 pages. |
Examination Report issued in India Patent Appl. No. 7088/chenp/2008 on Mar. 18, 2016; 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070295509 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60805693 | Jun 2006 | US |