Integrated reformer and syngas separator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9840413
  • Patent Number
    9,840,413
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 18, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 12, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A reformer assembly for a fuel cell includes a vortex tube receiving heated fuel mixed with steam. A catalyst coats the inner wall of the main tube of the vortex tube and a hydrogen-permeable tube is positioned in the middle of the main tube coaxially with the main tube.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to hydrocarbon reformers and syngas separators for fuel cell-based energy production, systems and petrochemical processing.


BACKGROUND

Fuel cells produce electricity by processing hydrogen or hydrocarbon-based teed, often a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide referred to as “syngas”. The syngas is produced by reforming hydrocarbon fuels such as natural gas or diesel fuel. Reforming entails breaking the hydrocarbon chemical bonds, leaving a mixture of separate carbon-based molecules and hydrogen molecules. In any case, many fuel cell-based energy production systems use reformer assemblies to produce the syngas required as input to the fuel cell.


As understood in the present assignee's U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,969, incorporated herein by reference, the life and operational flexibility of fuel cells can be extended by providing only the hydrogen to the fuel cells, diverting the carbon-based products of the reformer assembly elsewhere, e.g., into a turbine or internal combustion energy. Such separation of the syngas components may be accomplished using membrane separation technology. Present principles are directed to a novel reformer assembly which both reforms hydrocarbon-based fuel and separates hydrogen from carbon-based constituents.


SUMMARY

Accordingly, a reformer assembly includes at least one vortex tube with a swirl chamber having an input and a main tube segment communicating with the swirl chamber and having a first output juxtaposed with an inside surface of a wall of the main tube segment. The first output is for outputting relatively hotter and heavier constituents of the gas provided at the input. At least one catalytic constituent is on the inside surface of the wall of the main tube segment. Also, at least one hydrogen-permeable tube can be disposed centrally in the main tube segment and defines a second output at one end of the hydrogen-permeable tube for outputting at least one relatively lighter and cooler constituent of fluid provided at the input.


In example, the relatively lighter and cooler constituent includes hydrogen, while the relatively hotter and heavier constituents of the gas provided at the input include carbon.


If desired, the catalytic constituent can include nickel and/or platinum and/or rhodium and/or palladium and/or gold.


In some examples a fuel cell is connected to the second output.


In some examples an engine connected to the first output. The engine can be, e.g., an internal combustion engine or a turbine.


In an embodiment, plural vortex tubes are arranged in a toroidal configuration, with a first vortex lube in the plural vortex tubes defining the input and providing gas from the respective second output to an input of a next vortex tube in the plural vortex tubes.


In one configuration the lighter gas output is the input to the next vortex tube and in another configuration the heavier gas is the input to the next vortex tube input.


In some examples, a fuel reservoir may be provided for providing hydrocarbon fuel to the vortex tube. The example fuel reservoir may be configured for receiving an exhaust of an engine to heat fuel within the fuel reservoir.


In some examples, a steam reservoir may be provided for providing steam to the vortex tube, with the steam reservoir configured for receiving an exhaust of an engine to heat fluid within the steam reservoir. Also or in addition, the steam reservoir may be configured for receiving steam from the fuel cell.


A water gas shift reactor may be provided for receiving fluid from the second output of the vortex tube.


In another aspect, a system includes a fuel cell and at least one vortex tube assembly for receiving hydrocarbon fuel as input and providing hydrogen reformed and separated from the hydrocarbon fuel within the vortex tube to the fuel cell.


In another aspect, a method includes reforming hydrocarbon fuel using at least one vortex tube, and separating hydrogen from carbon-based constituents during the reforming. The method also includes providing the hydrogen to at least one fuel cell.


The details of the present description, both as to its structure and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example energy generation system;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example vortex tube reformer/separator assembly; and



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a toroidal vortex tube assembly.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows an actuation system 10, described further below, that in one example imparts energy to a receiver, such as an internal combustion engine for a vehicle or in the example shown by imparting torque to a rotor of a turbine 12 to rotate an output shaft of the turbine. The turbine 12 may include a compressor section, a combustion section, and a turbine section in accordance with turbine principles and may also have one or more rotors or shafts which typically are coupled to each other and which may be concentric to each other.



FIG. 1 shows that in one implementation, a fuel tank 14 which contains hydrocarbon-based fuel such as but not limited to jet fuel can provide fuel to an intake 16 of the turbine 12. The fuel typically is injected through injectors in the turbine, where it mixes with air compressed by the compressor section of the turbine and ignited in a so-called “flame holder” or “can”. “Intake” refers generally to these portions of the turbine that are preliminary to the turbine blades. The high-pressure mixture is then directed to impinge on turbine blades 18 which are coupled to the output shaft. In this way torque is imparted to the output shaft to cause it to rotate about its axis. In other implementations the turbine 12 need not be a combustion turbine, and as alluded to above other receivers such as internal combustion engines in vehicles may be used.


The output shaft of the turbine can be coupled to the rotor of an electrical generator to rotate the generator rotor within an electric field and thus cause the generator to output electricity. Or, the output shaft of the turbine may be coupled to the rotor of an aircraft fan to rotate the fan and thus cause it to generate thrust for propelling a turbofan jet plane. Yet again, the output shaft of the turbine may be coupled to the rotor of a propulsion component such as the rotor of a helicopter, the shaft of a watercraft on which a propeller is mounted, or a drive shaft of a land vehicle such as a military tank to rotate the rotor/shaft/drive shaft as the case may be to propel the platform through the air or water or over land, depending on the nature of the conveyance. The propulsion component may include a drive train that can include a combination of components known in the art, e.g., crankshafts, transmissions, axles, and so on.


In addition to or in lieu of actuating a receiver such as the turbine 12 with feel directly from the fuel tank 14, the actuation system 10 may include a reformer assembly 20 which receives fuel from the fuel tank 14. While some embodiments of the reformer assembly may include a reformer and a membrane-type hydrogen separator to separate hydrogen in the reformed product of the reformer from the carbon-based constituents, a vortex tube-based reformer assembly is described further below.


The reformer assembly 20 produces hydrogen from the fuel, and the hydrogen is sent to a fuel cell 22, in some cases through a hydrogen tank 24 first as shown. If desired, multiple reformers and/or fuel cells may be used in parallel with each other.


The fuel cell 22 uses the hydrogen to generate electricity, typically with a relatively high efficiency, by oxidizing the hydrogen with oxygen from, e.g., the ambient atmosphere. Without limitation, the feel cell 22 may be a polymer exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), an alkaline fuel cell (AFC), a molten-carbonate fuel cell (MCFC), a phosphoric-acid fuel cell (PAFC), or a direct-methanol feel cell (DMFC).


In turn, electricity from the fuel cell 22 may be sent to an electric motor 26 to cause an output shaft of the motor 26 to turn. The motor shaft is mechanically coupled through a rotor coupling 28 to a rotor of the turbine 12. Typically, the turbine rotor to which the motor 26 is coupled is not the same segment of rotor bearing the blades 18, although in some implementations this can be the case. Instead, the turbine rotor to which the motor 26 may be coupled may be a segment of the blade rotor that does not bear blades or a rotor separate from the blade rotor and concentric therewith or otherwise coupled thereto. In any case, the motor 26, when energized by the fuel cell 22, imparts torque (through appropriate couplings if desired) through a turbine rotor to the output shaft of the turbine 12, which in some cases may be the same shaft as that establishing the turbine rotor. Power from the motor 26 may be provided to components other than the receiver embodied by the turbine. Yet again, the electrical power produced by the fuel cell may be sent to electrical storage, such as a battery system, or to the electrical distribution grid of a municipality.


In addition, to realize further efficiencies, output of the fuel cell such as water in the form of steam produced by the fuel cell 22 may be mixed with hydrocarbon from the reformer assembly 20 in a mixer 30, which may be a tank or simple pipe or other void in which the water and carbon can mix, with the mixture then being directed (through, e.g., appropriate piping or ducting) to the turbine intake 16. If desired, surfactant from a surfactant tank 32 may also be added to the steam/carbon mixture. Or, the steam from the fuel cell may be sent to the reformer assembly described below without mixing the steam with carbon and/or without mixing the steam with surfactant.


In any case, it may now be appreciated that the steam/carbon mixture may supplement fuel injection, directly from the fuel tank 14 to the turbine intake 16, or replace altogether fuel injection directly from the fuel tank 14 to the turbine intake 16.


Still further, electricity produced by the fuel cell 22 may fee used not only to actuate the electric motor 26 (or provide power to a battery storage or the grid) but also to provide ignition current, for the appropriate components in the turbine or engine 12. Also, electricity from the fuel cell may be used for other auxiliary purposes, e.g., in addition to actuating the electric motor, powering other electrical appliances. In cases where the reformer assembly 20 generates carbon dioxide and steam, these fluids may also be directed to the intake 16 of the turbine directly from the reformer assembly 20 or through the mixer 30.


In some embodiments, water can be returned from the fuel cell 22 if desired to the reformer assembly 20 through a water line 34. Also if desired, heat from the receiver (e.g., from the turbine 12) may be collected and routed back to the reformer assembly 20 through ducting/piping 36, to heat the reformer assembly.



FIG. 2 illustrates a vortex tube-based reformer assembly 20. As shown, the assembly 20 may include a steam reservoir 200 and a fuel reservoir 202. The steam reservoir 200 and fuel reservoir 202 may be heat exchangers, schematically depicted by illustrating a respective outer heating chamber 200a, 202a surrounding a respective inner fluid chamber 200b, 202b, with the heat in each outer heat exchange chamber heating the fluid in the respective inner fluid chamber. Heat may be supplied to each heat exchange chamber 200a, 202a via the exhaust line 36 from the exhaust of the receiver of FIG. 1, e.g., the turbine 12.


First considering the steam reservoir 200, initial water or steam for startup may be supplied to the intake side of an optional impeller 204 or other fluid movement device until such time as the Initial water or steam may be supplemented and preferably superseded by steam exhaust from the fuel cell 22 via the line 34 as shown, initial startup heat may also be provided, e.g., from an electric heating element 206 in the heat exchange chamber 200a of the fluid reservoir 200, from exhaust heat from the turbine or engine, or from some other source of heat until such time as the startup heat may be supplemented and preferably superseded by exhaust heat from the receiver (e.g., turbine 12) via the exhaust line 36 as shown. In any case, the initial water heated into steam for startup and the steam from the fuel cell during operation are sent to a mixer/injector reservoir 208, under the influence of the impeller 204 when provided or simply under steam pressure within the inner fluid chamber 200b.


With respect to the fuel reservoir 202, hydrocarbon fuel such as but not limited to natural gas may be supplied from the fuel tank 14 to the intake side of an optional impeller 210 or other fluid movement device. Initial startup heat may also be provided, e.g., from an electric heating element 212 in the heat exchange chamber 202a of the fuel reservoir 202 or from some other source of heat until such time as the startup heat may be supplemented and preferably superseded by exhaust heat from the receiver (e.g., turbine 12) via the exhaust line 36 as shown. In any case, the heated fuel in the fluid chamber 202b of the fuel reservoir 202, preferably scrubbed of sulfur by desulfurizer sorbent elements 213 that may be provided on the inside wall of the fuel chamber, is sent to the mixer/injector reservoir 208, under the influence of the impeller 210 when provided or simply under fluid pressure within the inner fluid chamber 202b. In some case, the fuel may not be heated prior to provision to the mixer/injector 208.


In some examples, the steam in the steam reservoir 200 and/or fuel in the fuel, reservoir 202 may be heated to six hundred degrees Celsius (600° C.) to one thousand one hundred degrees Celsius (1100° C.) at a pressure of three atmospheres to thirty atmospheres (3 atm-30 atm). More generally, the reaction temperatures applied to the hydrocarbon and steam mixtures can proceed from, a low temperature of 300 C up to 1200 C. These temperatures can be optimized for the input hydrocarbon feed type, the duty transit time of the process through the reaction tube, and the applied pressures caused by the turbulent flow such the vortex generated in the reaction tube.


The mixer/injector 208 mixes the steam from the steam reservoir 200 with the fuel from the fuel reservoir 202. The mixing may be accomplished under the influence of the turbidity of the respective fluids as they enter the mixer/injector 208 and/or by additional mixing components such as rotating impellers within the mixer/injector 208 and/or by other suitable means. The mixer/injector 208 injects the mixed steam and fuel into a vortex tube 214, e.g., through fuel injectors or simply through a port and fluid line under the influence of fluid pressure within the mixer.


The vortex tube 214, which also may be known as a Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube, is a mechanical device that separates a compressed fluid into hot and cold streams. It typically has no moving parts.


As shown, the pressurized mixture of steam and fuel from the mixer/injector 208 is injected, preferably tangentially, into a swirl chamber 216 of the vortex tube 214, and accelerated to a high rate of rotation by the cooperation of geometry between the swirl chamber 216 and cylindrical wall of a main tube segment 218 that is oriented perpendicular to the input axis of the swirl chamber 216 as shown. A first conical nozzle 220 may be provided at one end of the vortex tube 214 so that only the outer shell of the compressed gas is allowed to escape at that end. The remainder of the gas is forced to return back through the main inner tube 218 toward the swirl chamber 216 in an inner vortex of reduced diameter that is substantially coaxial with the main tube segment 218 as shown. In one embodiment, the inner vortex can be enclosed in a hydrogen-permeable tube 222 that leads to a hydrogen output 224, which may be established by a second conical nozzle. The hydrogen-permeable tube 222, when provided, preferably is impermeable to carbon-based constituents. The tube 222 may include Palladium.


A catalyzing layer 226 may be formed on or made integral with the inside surface of at least the main inner tube 218 to attract carbon-based constituents to the outer circumference of the passageway formed by the main inner tube. The catalyzing layer may include nickel and/or platinum and/or rhodium and/or palladium and/or gold. The tube 218 may be composed of the catalyzing layer or the layer 226 may be added to a tube substrate as by, e.g., vapor deposition of the catalyzing layer 226 onto the tubs substrate, which may be ceramic.


The cooperation of structure of the vortex tube 214 forces relatively cooler hydrogen from the input fuel toward the axis of the main tube 218 into the hydrogen-permeable tube 222 when, provided, and left looking down at FIG. 2 along the axis of the main tube 218, while forcing the relatively heavier and hotter carbon-based constituents of the fuel outward against the catalytic layer 226 and right looking down at FIG. 2. Owing to the cooperation of structure depicted, the fuel is both chemically reformed into hydrogen and carbon-based constituents and the hydrogen is physically separated from the carbon-based constituents for provisioning to the fuel cell 22.


If desired, an evacuation mechanism such as a vacuum pump 228 may be provided to aid in withdrawing hydrogen from the hydrogen output 224 of the vortex tube 214. Also, if desired the hydrogen may be passed through a water gas shift reactor (WSGR) 230 to further purify the hydrogen, prior to provisioning to the feel cell 22.


On the other hand, the carbon-based constituents of the fuel are sent out of the right side of the main tube 218 of the vortex tube 214 to the receiver, e.g., the turbine 12, in some cases via the mixer 30 shown in FIG. 1.


Fuel cells typically work better when the hydrogen input to them is relatively cooler than that produced by conventional reformers, which consequently may require cooling. Moreover, it may be difficult to employ certain hydrogen cooling techniques such as WGSR with extremely high temperature hydrogen from a conventional reformer, meaning the hydrogen may require significant cooling. By reforming the fuel, separating the hydrogen, and cooling the hydrogen (relative to the carbon-basal constituents) in a single reformer assembly as described herein, multiple benefits accrue, including the ability to produce relatively cool hydrogen which requires less post-reforming cooling and which extends the life of the fuel cell.


Accordingly, the application of vortex or cyclonic swirling action enables the elegant integration of these processes and provides higher energy efficiency, improved fuel utilization, and increased hydrogen yield. Additional advantages over conventional reformers include shifting of the chemical equilibrium to favor hydrogen production. This is achieved by the placement of a hydrogen permeable membrane separator tube at the low-pressure site of the vortex to pull or harvest hydrogen from the evolving hydrocarbon syngas mixture during the reforming process in the tube. This process is achieved through the combination of a generated vortex or vortexes, which enhances the reforming and vortex gas separation simultaneously while also enhancing the harvesting and cooling of the hydrogen gas.


In the approach described above, the generated vortex provides centrifugal spinning action which is applied to the gases in a circular tube, initially to the hydrocarbon and steam, which tangentially presses at higher pressures and temperatures against the walls of the catalyst-lined main tube 218, enhancing the rate of reforming. This is due to the higher temperatures and pressures on the on the more massive molecular gases (the hydrocarbons and steam) imposed by the swirling motion contacting the walls of the catalyst lined tube.


As the reforming process proceeds down the tube in the vortex, the input hydrocarbon gas mixture differentiates or stratifies axially in the tube according to gas densities. The hydrocarbons and the steam being the densest congregate at the inside wall of the tube and the hydrogen having the lowest density will move towards the center of the vortex. The higher momentums are imparted to the heavier gases, the longest chain hydrocarbons and the steam, which collide with high force and in high densities with the catalyst-lined wall of the tube. This optimizes compliance and the interface between the hydrocarbon, the steam and the catalyst for a given pressure.


The hydrogen gases, which are less massive, are pulled toward the center of the vortex, toward the lower pressure zone, away from the peripheral. This effect, moving the hydrogen away from the peripheral, improves the access path to the catalyst for the heavier hydrocarbons, steam, and carbon oxides. The center of the tube, where the vortex has its lowest pressures, contains the hydrogen permeable filter tube 222 with suction for pulling hydrogen. Therefore hydrogen permeates in to the center and is drawn off from the reaction with a negative pressure, thereby harvesting the hydrogen while the reforming process proceeds.


The hydrogen is separated and drawn to the center of the vortex due to its lower density and it is further drawn into the waifs of the hydrogen permeable separation tube due to the negative pressure applied to the tube. The drawing off or harvesting of hydrogen from the ongoing reforming further improves the dynamic chemical reactions in conjunction with catalyst by depleting hydrogen, limiting unfavorable hydrogen reversible reactions. This increases the hydrogen to carbon production ratio.


With the above in mind, the product of the reformation reaction (syngas) is continually tapped during the transit time along the vortex tube providing the purified output streams and further changing the equilibrium balance of the ongoing reaction to improve the amount of hydrogen produced. The vortex cyclonic action may be applied to the injected hydrocarbon and steam feeds by means of propeller, or pump which a causes the heavy hydrocarbon base gases and steam towards the tube walls. This action causes reforming of some of the hydrocarbons impinging on the catalysts, ejecting hydrogen and carbon monoxide. These two gases being lighter than the CH4 are propelled towards the center of the vortex away from the wall of the vortex tube. The separated output streams consisting of hydrogen on the one hand and steam, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and trace impurities on the other are individually tapped and fed to respective output streams.


The production and the separation of the output fuels streams are both enhanced by means of the vortex action in the reaction tube and the progressive removal of the fractional products, such as hydrogen, which further provides dynamic optimization due to the continuous non equilibrium conditions.


In addition to appropriate sensors, valves, and controller electronics, the vortex tube may include fuel and steam injectors, heating inputs, heat exchangers, high shear turbulent mixers, internal filters, and output stream taps. The output hydrogen and some steam can be fed to the fuel cell 22, with carbon-based constituents and some steam being fed to the receiver. In some implementations most of the steam and heaver fractional hydrocarbons can be fed back into the vortex tube or a plurality of vortex tubes.



FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment in which plural vortex tubes are arranged in an endless loop 300, referred to herein as a “toroidal” configuration without implying that the endless loop is perfectly round. Each vortex tube may be substantially identical in construction and operation to the vortex tube 214 in FIG. 2.


As shown, fuel may be input to an initial vortex tube 302, the hydrogen output from the hydrogen permeable tube of which is sent as input to the swirl chamber of the next vortex tube 304, whose hydrogen output in turn is provided as input to the next vortex tube. “N” vortex tubes may this be arranged in series in the configuration 300, with “N” being an integer (in the example shown, N=8) and with the hydrogen output of the Nth vortex tube 306 being sent to the fuel cell 22. In this way, the hydrogen is successively separated into ever-more-pure input for the fuel cell, while the carbon-based constituents output from each vortex tube can be individually withdrawn from each tube and sent to the receiver, as indicated by the “N” arrows 308.


The configuration 300 of FIG. 3 may be used in the system shown in FIG. 2, with the initial vortex tube 302 receiving fuel from the mixer/Injector 208 and sending hydrogen from the hydrogen output 224 to the swirl chamber input of the next vortex tube, and with the hydrogen output of the Nth vortex tube 306 being sent to the fuel cell 22 via the vacuum pump 228 and WSGR 230. Carbon-based constituents from each vortex tube of FIG. 3 may be sent to the mixer/receiver 30/12.


In other embodiments, the carbon output of each tube is sent to the input of the next tube with the hydrogen outputs of each tube being individually directed out of the toroidal configuration 300 and sent to the fuel cell.


Components included in one embodiment can be used in other embodiments in any appropriate combination. For example, any of the various components described herein and/or depicted in the Figures may be combined, interchanged or excluded from other embodiments.


“A system having at least one of A, B, and C” (likewise “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” and “a system having at least one of A, B, C”) includes systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.


While the particular INTEGRATED REFORMER AND SYNGAS SEPARATOR is herein shown and described in detail, the scope of the present application is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. System comprising: at least one fuel cell;a mixer connected to a steam reservoir and to a fuel reservoir; andat least one vortex tube assembly configured to receive a steam/hydrocarbon mixture from the mixer and to generate hydrogen by reforming the hydrocarbon in the steam/hydrocarbon mixture within the vortex tube, and to provide the hydrogen to the fuel cell, wherein the vortex tube assembly comprises:a swirl chamber and a cylindrical main tube segment, the swirl chamber receiving the steam/hydrocarbon mixture and communicating the steam/hydrocarbon mixture to an input of the main tube segment, the swirl chamber defining an input axis along which the steam/hydrocarbon mixture flows, the steam/hydrocarbon mixture entering the main tube segment tangentially, the main tube segment defining a tube axis, the input axis of the swirl chamber not being parallel to the tube axis, the main tube segment having a first output juxtaposed with an inside surface of a wall of the main tube segment, the first output outputting relatively hotter and heavier constituents of the steam/hydrocarbon mixture provided at the input of the main tube segment, the vortex tube defining a second output opening opposite the first output, the steam/hydrocarbon input from the swirl chamber into the main tube segment being positioned between the first and the second outputs of the main tube segment; andat least one catalytic constituent on the inside surface of the wall of the main tube segment.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the vortex tube assembly comprises: at least one conical nozzle disposed at the first output and flaring outwardly therefrom, the configuration of the nozzle allowing only an outer shell of compressed gas impinging on the nozzle to escape at the second output.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, comprising: at least one hydrogen-permeable tube disposed centrally in the main tube segment and defining the second output at one end of the hydrogen-permeable tube for outputting at least one relatively lighter and cooler constituent of hydrocarbon provided at the hydrocarbon input.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, comprising: plural vortex tubes arranged in a toroidal configuration, a first vortex tube in the plural vortex tubes defining the input and providing fluid from a respective second output to an input of a next vortex tube in the plural vortex tubes.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, comprising a water gas shift reactor for receiving, at an output of the vortex tube, lighter and cooler constituents of fluid provided at an input of the vortex tube.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the input of the main tube segment receiving the steam/hydrocarbon mixture from the swirl chamber is at an end of the main tube segment.
US Referenced Citations (151)
Number Name Date Kind
3116344 Deisler Dec 1963 A
3546891 Fekete Dec 1970 A
3563883 Westby et al. Feb 1971 A
3636679 Batta Jan 1972 A
3642430 Benson Feb 1972 A
3948224 Knapp et al. Apr 1976 A
3956903 Hiller et al. May 1976 A
3977850 Hill Aug 1976 A
4059415 Kosaka Nov 1977 A
4093427 Schlenker Jun 1978 A
4235845 Bose Nov 1980 A
4332224 Latsch et al. Jun 1982 A
4392345 Geary Jul 1983 A
4399107 Bose Aug 1983 A
4455220 Parker et al. Jun 1984 A
4482365 Roach Nov 1984 A
4522159 Engel et al. Jun 1985 A
4531558 Engel et al. Jul 1985 A
4606743 Shuman Aug 1986 A
4797262 Dewitz Jan 1989 A
4798183 Hataura et al. Jan 1989 A
5193341 Sibbertsen et al. Mar 1993 A
5391211 Alliston et al. Feb 1995 A
5409784 Bromberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5413227 Diebold et al. May 1995 A
5472463 Herman et al. Dec 1995 A
5507267 Stuer Apr 1996 A
5558069 Stay Sep 1996 A
6106963 Nitta et al. Aug 2000 A
6164308 Butler Dec 2000 A
6247460 Lindberg et al. Jun 2001 B1
6296820 Happrich Oct 2001 B1
6354318 Butler Mar 2002 B2
6379411 Turner et al. Apr 2002 B1
6398851 Bose Jun 2002 B1
6521205 Beck Feb 2003 B1
6793698 Sanger Sep 2004 B1
6810658 Kaupert et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823833 Ismailov Nov 2004 B2
6843832 Greene et al. Jan 2005 B2
6851398 Taylor, III et al. Feb 2005 B2
6932858 Nicol et al. Aug 2005 B2
7066973 Bentley et al. Jun 2006 B1
7086854 Rakhmailov et al. Aug 2006 B2
7191738 Shkolnik Mar 2007 B2
7220505 Malhotra et al. May 2007 B2
7241522 Moulthrop et al. Jul 2007 B2
7297324 Tegrotenhuis et al. Nov 2007 B2
7427381 Stell Sep 2008 B2
7464540 Easley et al. Dec 2008 B2
7575610 Liu et al. Aug 2009 B2
7591242 Shih Sep 2009 B2
7594941 Zheng et al. Sep 2009 B2
7628144 Vetrovec Dec 2009 B2
7685819 Vetrovec Mar 2010 B2
7707837 Inui et al. May 2010 B2
7757866 McCutchen Jul 2010 B2
7901485 McCutchen Mar 2011 B2
7909013 Shkolnik et al. Mar 2011 B2
8070938 Stein et al. Dec 2011 B2
8078385 Vetrovec Dec 2011 B2
8210214 Casey et al. Jul 2012 B2
8216323 Liu et al. Jul 2012 B2
8220442 Caldwell Jul 2012 B2
8257668 Mukai et al. Sep 2012 B2
8303674 Tamura et al. Nov 2012 B2
8365699 Shkolnik et al. Feb 2013 B2
8656720 Hardgrave Feb 2014 B1
8663369 Buhrman et al. Mar 2014 B2
8667949 Mizuguchi Mar 2014 B2
8677949 Bromberg et al. Mar 2014 B2
8715868 Weidner May 2014 B2
8747496 Neels et al. Jun 2014 B2
8758459 Johnston Jun 2014 B2
8793981 Li Aug 2014 B2
8808425 Genkin et al. Aug 2014 B2
8858679 Buhrman et al. Oct 2014 B2
8863723 Shkolnik et al. Oct 2014 B2
8883360 Hong et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888899 Chan et al. Nov 2014 B2
8936769 Blevins et al. Jan 2015 B2
8945488 Bowe et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961625 Hartvigsen et al. Feb 2015 B2
8966879 Munson Mar 2015 B1
8968432 Whyatt et al. Mar 2015 B2
8968433 Chandran Mar 2015 B2
8986631 Berggren et al. Mar 2015 B2
8987341 Early Mar 2015 B2
8999020 Raman Apr 2015 B2
9012098 Goto et al. Apr 2015 B2
9116528 Ukai et al. Aug 2015 B2
9140221 Foege Sep 2015 B2
9145298 Volpi et al. Sep 2015 B2
9156688 Hyde et al. Oct 2015 B2
9169118 Bossard Oct 2015 B1
9169778 Allam Oct 2015 B2
9266732 Park et al. Feb 2016 B2
20010011556 Butler Aug 2001 A1
20020095916 Turner et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020194992 Greene et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040013923 Molter et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040099614 Lehmann et al. May 2004 A1
20050045033 Nicol et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050166869 Shkolnik Aug 2005 A1
20060013759 Jiang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060084022 Kruger Apr 2006 A1
20060135630 Bowe Jun 2006 A1
20070125346 Vetrovec Jun 2007 A1
20070137590 Vetrovec Jun 2007 A1
20070277506 Easley et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080047239 Zheng et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080133110 Vetrovec Jun 2008 A1
20080141973 Shkolnik et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080251419 Stein et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090013867 McCutchen Jan 2009 A1
20090022465 Chen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090060805 Muradov Mar 2009 A1
20090165887 Casey et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090259388 Vetrovec Oct 2009 A1
20100132153 Leibold et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110056457 Livshits et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110114057 Shkolnik et al. May 2011 A1
20110212090 Pedersen et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110219948 McCutchen Sep 2011 A1
20110229834 Salansky et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110296869 Buhrman et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110296986 Buhrman et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120034135 Risby Feb 2012 A1
20120067214 Salcedo Mar 2012 A1
20120111994 Kummer et al. May 2012 A1
20120125300 Caldwell May 2012 A1
20120216915 Takata et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130041049 Bowe et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067905 Eckert Mar 2013 A1
20130086884 Michaels-Christopher Apr 2013 A1
20130139785 Shkolnik et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140130756 McAlister May 2014 A1
20140150753 Foege Jun 2014 A1
20140166539 Balepin et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140170038 Fischer et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140190588 Sloan et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140208703 Willems et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150024297 Finnerty Jan 2015 A1
20150110609 Shkolnik et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119478 Bowe et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150144841 Finnerty May 2015 A1
20150159284 Packer Jun 2015 A1
20150252757 McAlister Sep 2015 A1
20150291887 Coetzee et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160045841 Kaplan et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160254557 Finnerty Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2012023858 Aug 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
Alex C. Hoffman, Louis E. Stein, “Gas Cyclones and Swirl Turbines”, Published Jan. 1, 2002, 22 pages.
Catherine E. Gregoire Padro, Francis Lau, “Advances in Hydrogen Energy”, Jan. 1, 2000, 201 pages.
Ceramatec, “Hydrogen Separation/ Purification” printed Jan. 8, 2015, http://www.ceramatec.com/technology/ceramic-solid-state-ionic-technologies/separation-&-purification-technologies/hydrogen.php.
Kevin T. Raterman, Michael Mckellar, Ana Podgorney, Douglas Stacey, Terry Turner, Brian Stokes, John Vranicar, “A Vortex Contractor for Carbon Dioxide Separations”, Published May 1, 2001.
Yue Li, Qi Fu, Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, “Low-Temperature Water-Gas Shift Reaction Over Cu-and Ni-Loaded Cerium Oxide Catalysts”, Elservier, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 27 (2000) 179-191.
Vortex Tube Hydrogen Reformer—Google Search, printed from web Apr. 28, 2016. https://www.google.com/search?q=vortex+tube+hydrogen+reformer&sa=X&biw=1536&bih=706&tbm=isch&imgil=uGLmriZoHEt17M%253A%253Bc12E—P7-Kw8jUM%253Bhttps%25253A%25252F%25252Fhydrogen.wsu.edu%25252Fh2refuel%25252Fdesign%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=uGLmriZoHEt17M%253A%252Cc12E—P7-Kw8jUM%252C—&usg=—I8nBmM1j77Yjb0AnxJyNGIOdIGw%.
Jacob Leachman, “Kinetic Orthohydrogen-parahydrogen separation to enable small-modular hydrogen liquefaction”, Concept Paper DE-FOA-0001002, printed Apr. 28, 2016.
Upendra Behera, P.J. Paul, K. Dinesh, S. Jacob, “Numerical investigations on flow behaviour and energy separation in Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 51 (2008) 6077-6089.
Tanvir Farouk, Bakhtier, Farouk, Alexander Gustol, “Simulation of gas species and temperature separation in the counter-flow Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube using the large eddy simulation technique”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52 (2009) 3320-3333.
Sam Wong and Rob Bioletti, “Carbon Dioxide Separation Technologies” Carbon & Energy Management Alberta Research Council, http://www.aidis.org.br/PDF/CARBON%20DIOXIDE%20SEPARATION%20TECHNOLOGIES.pdf, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
“The Vortex-Tube as a Tool in Sustainable Energy Production”, STW.nl, Project No. 10538, 2 pages, http://www.stw.nl/nl/content/vortex-tube-tool-sustainable-energy-production, obtained Mar. 11, 2015.
Pongjet Promvonge and Smith Elamsa-Ard, “Invesigation on the Vortex Thermal Separation in a Vortex Tube Refrigerator”, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
David McCutchen, “Vorsana Radial Counterflow Solutions, Vorsana Gas Scrubber”, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
“Vorsana—Radial Counterflow Solutions, Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture”, http://www.vorsana.com/co2andairpollution/carboncapture.html, dated Mar. 11, 2015.
“Vorsana Shear Retort”, Vorsana Radial Counterflow Solutions, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
“Vorsana TriPhase Filter”, Vorsana Radial Counterflow Solutions, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
“Vorsana Scrubber”, Vorsana Radial Counterflow Solutions, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
Eltron Research & Development, “High Temperature, Hydrogen Separation A Carbon Capture Process Technology”, Program Overview Feb. 2011.
Eltron Reserach & Development, “Tech Brief Maximum, Economical CO2 Capture for IGCC Power Plants” technology Readiness Level:4 Component and/or Breadboard Validation in Laboratory Environment, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
Doe Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, “II.0 Hydrogen Production Sub-Program Overview”, FY 2014 Annual Progress Report, II-3-II-10, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
G.Q.Lu, J.C.Diniz Da Costa, M. Duke, S. Giessler, R. Socolow, R.H. Williams, T. Kreutz, “Inorganic membranes for hydrogen production and purification: A critical review and perspective”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 314 (2007) 589-603.
William D. Jones and Frank J. Feher, “Comparative Reactivities of Hydrocarbon C—H Bonds with a Transition-Metal Complex”, Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 91-100.
Jian-Rong Li, Yuguang Ma, M. Colin McCarthy, Julian Sculley, Jiamei Yu, Hae-Kwon Jeong, Perla B. Balbuean, Hong-Cai Zhou, “Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 255 (2011) 1791-1823.
Jean-Yves Saillard and Roald Hoffmann, “C—H and H—H Activation in Transition Metal Complexes and on Surfaces” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2006-2026.
Air Products Advanced Prism Membrane Systms for Cost Effective Gas Separations Prism Separtors brochure obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
Air Products Presentation, obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
PALL Pall Corporation, Gas Separation Membrane; obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
Ashok Damle, Jim Acquaviva, PALL Corporation, “Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production” AlChE 2008 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA; Nov. 17, 2008.
Scott Hopkins, Matthew Keeling, Chuck Love, Keith Rekczis, Kevin Stark and Ashok Damle, “Pall Corporation, Commercialization of Pd Alloy Composite Membranes for Small Scale Hydrogen Generation, Fuel Cell Seminar 2011”, Nov. 3, 2011.
Christian P. Canlas, Junling Lu, Natalie A. Ray, Nicolas A. Grosso-Giordano, Sungsik Lee, Jeffrey W. Elam, Randall E. Winans, Richard P. Van Duyne, Peter C. Stair, Justing M. Notestein, “Shape-selective sieving layers on an oxide catalyst surface”, Nature Chemistry 4, 1030-1036, Nov. 9, 2012.
J.W. Phair, S.P.S. Badwal, “Materials for separation membranes in hydrogen and oxygen production and future power generation” ScienceDirect Science and Technology of Advanced Material 7 (2006) 792-805.
S.M. Saufi, A.F. Ismail, “Fabrication of carbon membranes for gas separation—a review” Science Direct, Carbon 42 (2004) 241-259.
Doe Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program, FY 2012 Annual Progress Report, “II.C.2 Process Intensification of Hydrogen Unit Operations Using and Electrochemical Device” obtained Apr. 14, 2015.
Christina Myers, Henry Pennline, David Luebke, Jeffrey Ilonich, Janeille K. Dixon, Edward J. Maginn, Joan F. Brennecke, “High temperature separation of carbon dioxide/hydrogen mixtures using facilitated supported ionic liquid membranes” Journal of Membrane Science 322 (2008) 28-31.
Andres Mahecha-Botero, Tony Boyd, Ali Gulamhusein, Nicholas Comyn, C. Jim Lim, John R. Grace, Yoshinori Shirasaki, Ismu Yasuda, “Pure hydrogen generation in a fluidized-bed membrane reactor Experimental findings” Chemical Engineering Science 63 (2008) 2752-2762.
Arian Nijmeijer, “hYDROGEN-Selective Silica Membranes for Use in Membrane Steam Reforming” Thesis University of Twente, Enchede The Netherlands 1999.
Ke Liu, Chunshan Song, Velu Subramani, “Hydrogen and Syngas Production and Purification Technologies” 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Robert Hotto, “Vortex Tube Reformer for Hydrogen Production, Separation, and Integrated Use” file history of related pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/078,263, filed Mar. 23, 2016.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160344051 A1 Nov 2016 US