Integrated satellite/terrestrial antenna

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6181286
  • Patent Number
    6,181,286
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 22, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 30, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
An integrated dual-mode antenna including a quadrifilar antenna and a collocated monopole antenna. The integrated antenna is compact and unencumbered by signal blockage or isolation problems.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to an integrated antenna and more particularly, the present invention relates to a dual mode antenna system.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the prior art, satellite antennae, terrestrial antennae and integrations of these two have been proposed. Referring initially to the satellite antennae prior art, the quadrifilar helix has been known for several decades. This antenna includes four helical windings fed in phase quadrature. This arrangement provided several characteristics particularly well suited to satellite communications including a hemispherical omnidirectional radiation pattern with excellent circular polarization throughout the radiation pattern as well as compactness and structural simplicity.




For mobile terrestrial communications, the same omnidirectional requirement exists, but the radiation pattern need only to be omnidirectional at the horizon due to the constraints of terrestrial communications on the position of the user relative to base stations. The most common arrangement in the art is the monopole antenna comprising a simple wire above a ground plane.




More contemporary designs of antennae have included dual mode systems. These systems accommodate satellite and terrestrial antennae. These systems present significant design problems particularly with respect to isolation between the two antennae, signal blockage minimization and compactness.




The prior art systems attempted to alleviate the design difficulties by simply placing a satellite antenna and a terrestrial antenna a minimum distance apart such that isolation and blockage requirements were met. Although a generally useful concept, in order to achieve the most desirable performance, a significant separation between the antennae was required. This did not solve the problem of compactness and, in fact, compromised the compactness requirement.




In U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,341, issued Feb. 4, 1997, to Thill et al., there is provided a dual function antenna structure for transceiving in first and second modes.




The apparatus taught in this U.S. patent is a dual frequency single antenna as opposed to a dual mode dual antenna. Accordingly, in the Thill et al. disclosure, there is no teaching with respect to a co-location of two discrete antennae and accordingly, there is no recognition or discussion of the problems encountered when one attempts to co-locate two antennae. The structure provides two feed points for two fields but remains a dual frequency single antenna. This arrangement does not address whatsoever any of the complications inherent in co-location of two antennae such as caging of the signal from antenna to block communication of the co-located antenna.




Further prior art related to the present invention is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,657, issued to Mochizuki, issued Sep. 25, 1990. This reference teaches an omnidirectional antenna having a reflector. There is no provision in this reference for the isolation of a monopole antenna with a quadrifilar antenna and accordingly, this reference simply teaches a variation on what is already known in this art.




Moore et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,657,792, issued Jul. 22, 1997, discloses a combination GPS and VHF antenna. The combination antenna provides a volute or quadrifilar antenna together with a monopole. Although the elements are provided, there is no co-location between the two antennae which, of course, does not contribute to the compactness of the antenna. By simply providing the combination of the two known antennae in spaced relation, interference problems are not in issue. From a review of the disclosure, it is clear that the Moore et al. reference fails to recognize the value of having a co-located antenna system.




The present invention completely overcomes the limitations in the known art and provides a dual mode antenna system having outstanding performance in a compact system.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One object of the present invention is to provide an improved dual mode antenna system.




A further object of the present invention is to provide an integrated antenna, comprising:




a quadrifilar antenna; and




a monopole antenna positioned within the quadrifilar antenna and independent of said quadrifilar antenna.




Advantageously, the isolation difficulties inherent with prior art arrangements do not present any concerns in the instant system. In view of the fact that the monopole antenna has a field null in its center, interference or blockage of the monopole signal does not occur, thus allowing the antennae to function as if completely isolated. This feature facilitates collocation of the antennae without any loss in performance.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of forming a dual mode integrated antenna, comprising the steps of:




providing a quadrifilar antenna for transceiving circularly polarized fields;




providing a monopole antenna for transceiving linearly polarized fields;




co-locating the monopole antenna within the quadrifilar antenna and independent of the quadrifilar antenna; and




phase coupling the monopole antenna to the quadrifilar antenna.




Having thus described the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings illustrating preferred embodiments.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a dual mode antenna according to the prior art;





FIG. 2

is an elevational view of the antenna in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2A

is a cross-section of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 3

is a graphical illustration of the return loss of the quadrifilar helix;





FIG. 4

is a graphical illustration of the radiation performance of the quadrifilar;





FIG. 5

is a graphical illustration of the return loss of the monopole;





FIG. 6

is a graphical illustration of the elevation cut of the monopole;





FIG. 7

is a graphical illustration of the azimuth sweep of the monopole; and





FIG. 8

is a graphical illustration of the frequency isolation between the two antenna ports.




Similar numerals in the figures denote similar elements.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring now to the drawings,

FIG. 1

illustrates a conventional dual mode antenna system having a cylindrical quadrifilar antenna


10


positioned in spaced relation to a monopole antenna


12


. The antennae are mounted on a ground plane


14


and spaced by a distance D for purposes of isolation and signal blockage minimization.





FIG. 2

depicts an example of the antenna system according to one embodiment of the present invention. In the embodiment shown, the monopole antenna


12


is positioned centrally (coaxially) of the quadrifilar antenna


10


. A capacitor and grounding tab, globally denoted by numeral


18


, are provided. A connection


20


for the quadrifilar antenna is provided for connection with an external source (not shown). A similar connection


22


is provided for the monopole antenna


12


. A brace


24


may be positioned beneath the ground plane


14


for bracing the system. The cylindrical quadrifilar does not demonstrate a field null in its center. The field pattern of the quadrifilar is formed by its windings


16


. As mentioned herein previously, this significantly reduces the effect on performance with the presence of the monopole antenna


12


. In the event that the frequency plan of the dual mode system is such that the satellite communications frequency is approximately an even multiple of the terrestrial communications frequency, the monopole antenna


12


presents a high impedance further improving the isolation between the two antennae


10


and


12


.




In

FIG. 2A

, a cross-section of the antenna is shown in which a rigid foam material


17


is disposed between the quadrifilar antenna on its interior surface and the monopole antenna


12


. As illustrated, the monopole antenna


12


is completely surrounded by the material


17


. In instances where rigidity to the overall antenna unit is not required, then the rigid foam may be readily replaced with semi or non-rigid foam material. In terms of the material for the foam, suitable examples include polyurethane foam, polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride foam, inter alia. With respect to the quadrifilar antenna, as illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the antenna includes four windings, which windings present a 45° angle relative to the monopole. It has been found that a 45° disposition provides the most effective results, however, for winding dispositions in the range of 36° to 48°, adequate results are obtainable. The windings of the quadrifilar are mounted to a polymeric cylinder as illustrated in

FIG. 2 and 2A

, with the polymer being selected from any of the suitable polymers, examples of which include Kapton™, Mylar™, etc.




As is known, the quadrifilar antenna windings


16


can interfere or otherwise block a radiated pattern from the monopole antenna


12


to free space. The present invention has advantages in that this “caging” effect can be minimized. This is achieved by selectively positioning the windings


16


of the quadrifilar antenna


10


. It has been found that this is an important feature in that if the angle of the windings is too steep, caging of the monopole antenna


12


will occur. Complications arise in the form of radiation pattern degradation as well as input impedance matching complications. If the pitch of the windings


16


is not steep enough, windings


16


become very close to each other and this results in the formation of an electrical wall which blocks radiation from the lower portion of the monopole antenna


12


. It has been found that a winding pitch degree comprising 45° yielded outstanding results.




Due to coupling from the monopole antenna


12


to the windings


16


of the quadrifilar antenna


10


being in phase, the nature of the quadrature feed network if the quadrifilar antenna leads to phase cancellation of the coupled energy. This contributes to high isolation at the terrestrial operating frequency.




In the figures, the design frequencies were as follows:




Satellite RX:1525-1575.42 MHz




Satellite TX:1610-1660.5 MHz




Terrestrial RX:806-825 MHz




Terrestrial TX:851-870 MHz





FIGS. 3 through 8

demonstrate performance results for the present invention. These results were generated using the windings of the quadrifilar antenna at an angle of 45° as indicated herein.




Although embodiments of the invention have been described above, it is not limited thereto and it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications form part of the present invention insofar as they do not depart from the spirit, nature and scope of the claimed and described invention.



Claims
  • 1. An integrated dual mode antenna, comprising:a quadrifilar antenna having a plurality of spaced apart windings and a feed connection for connection with a first feed; and a monopole antenna positioned within said quadrifilar antenna and independent of said quadrifilar antenna, said monopole antenna having a feed connection for connection with a second feed different from said first feed, said windings of said quadrifilar antenna being at an angle of between 36° to 48° relative to said monopole antenna.
  • 2. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein said quadrifilar antenna includes four windings.
  • 3. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein coupling from said monopole antenna to said quadrifilar antenna is in phase.
  • 4. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein said windings are at a 45° angle relative to said monopole antenna.
  • 5. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein said monopole is coaxially positioned within said quadrifilar antenna.
  • 6. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein said windings of said quadrifilar antenna are mounted to a polymeric cylinder.
  • 7. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein said quadrifilar antenna transceives circularly polarized fields and said monopole antenna transceives linearly polarized fields independently of said quadrifilar antenna.
  • 8. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein said plurality of windings are equidistant.
  • 9. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 1, wherein a foamed polymer is positioned between said quadrifilar antenna and said monopole antenna.
  • 10. The integrated antenna as set forth in claim 9, wherein said foamed polymer surrounds said monopole antenna.
  • 11. A method of forming a dual mode integrated antenna, comprising the steps of:providing a quadrifilar antenna for transceiving circularly polarized fields; providing a monopole antenna for transceiving linearly polarized fields; providing a separate feed connection for each of said guadrifilar antenna and said monopole antenna; co-locating said monopole antenna within said quadrifilar antenna and independent of said quadrifilar antenna; and phase coupling said monopole antenna to said quadrifilar antenna.
  • 12. The method as set forth in claim 11, further including the step of positioning a rigid polymeric foam material between said monopole antenna and said quadrifilar antenna.
  • 13. The method as set forth in claim 12, wherein said polymeric foam completely surrounds said monopole antenna.
Parent Case Info

This appln claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional No. 60/093,675 filed Jul. 22, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
4030100 Perrotti Jun 1977
4959657 Mochizuki Sep 1990
5317327 Piole May 1994
5457469 Diamond et al. Oct 1995
5479178 Ha Dec 1995
5546094 Egashira Aug 1996
5583520 Thill Dec 1996
5600341 Thill et al. Feb 1997
5610620 Stites et al. Mar 1997
5650792 Moore et al. Jul 1997
5684672 Karidis et al. Nov 1997
5717409 Garner et al. Feb 1998
5731791 Jang Mar 1998
5812097 Maldonado Sep 1998
5859618 Miller, II et al. Jan 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
0747990 A1 Dec 1996 EP
0755091 A1 Jan 1997 EP
2206243 Dec 1988 GB
2243724 Nov 1991 GB
2246910 Feb 1992 GB
2339969 Feb 2000 GB
WO 9741621 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9815029 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9928989 Jun 1999 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/093675 Jul 1998 US