Integrated seal for high-temperature electrochemical device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8486580
  • Patent Number
    8,486,580
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 12, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 16, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
The present invention provides electrochemical device structures having integrated seals, and methods of fabricating them. According to various embodiments the structures include a thin, supported electrolyte film with the electrolyte sealed to the support. The perimeter of the support is self-sealed during fabrication. The perimeter can then be independently sealed to a manifold or other device, e.g., via an external seal. According to various embodiments, the external seal does not contact the electrolyte, thereby eliminating the restrictions on the sealing method and materials imposed by sealing against the electrolyte.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to sealing high-temperature electrochemical devices, such as solid oxide fuel cells.


BACKGROUND

Solid-state electrochemical devices are normally cells that include two porous electrodes, the anode and the cathode, and a dense solid electrolyte membrane disposed between the electrodes. In the case of a typical solid oxide fuel cell, the anode is exposed to fuel and the cathode is exposed to an oxidant in separate closed systems to avoid any mixing of the fuel and oxidants.


External seals are used to seal off the closed systems and prevent mixing. While no dominant seal technology exists, examples includes braze seals, compressive seals and glass seals. Seal-less designs, which allow mixing of the fuel and oxidant streams at the outlet of the device, have also been in development, though oxidant and fuel mixing is generally undesirable. Long-term performance of braze seals has not been demonstrated. In addition, braze seals can be costly and the coefficient of thermal expansion (“CTE”) must be modified to match the CTE of the electrolyte. Compressive seals are generally made with mica, display high leak rate and have poor thermal cycling capability. Glass seals can react with sealed surfaces and also have poor thermal cycling ability.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides electrochemical device structures having integrated seals and methods of fabricating them. According to various embodiments, the structures include a thin, supported electrolyte film with the electrolyte sealed to the support. The perimeter of the support is self-sealed during fabrication. The perimeter can then be independently sealed to a manifold or other device, e.g., via an external seal. According to various embodiments, the external seal does not contact the electrolyte, thereby eliminating the restrictions on the sealing method and materials imposed by sealing against the electrolyte.


One aspect of the invention relates to electrochemical device structure having an integrated seal. The devices include first and second electrodes separated by a dense electrolyte and a support having dense and porous support regions. The dense and porous support regions share a dense support/porous support interface and are composed of the same material type (e.g., they are both metal or both cermet). The dense electrolyte is disposed on at least a portion of the dense support region to form an electrolyte/dense support interface. The electrolyte/dense support interface and dense support/porous support interface form a gas tight seal between the first electrode and the second electrode.


Another aspect of the invention relates to an electrochemical device structure having an integrated seal. The device includes first and second electrodes separated by a dense electrolyte; a porous support region cosintered to a dense support region to form a gas impermeable dense support/porous support interface; the dense electrolyte cosintered to at least a portion of the dense support region to form a gas impermeable electrolyte/dense support interface. The electrolyte/dense support interface and dense support/porous support interface forming a gas tight seal between the first electrode and the second electrode.


In certain embodiments, the dense support region provides a point of mechanical attachment to a housing, sheet, etc. For example, an external sealing member may be connected to the dense support region, to provide a further seal and/or to mount the device to a manifold, housing, another device, etc. This external sealing member is not in physical contact with the dense electrolyte. According to certain embodiments, the external sealing member is metal, and may be a brazed or welded joint. Also in certain embodiments, the dense support is fitted to a metal housing, e.g., by threading. In certain embodiments, the dense support region provides an electrical contact point for exchanging current or voltage with the device.


The porous support region may be an electrode or support an electrode. In certain embodiments, a ceramic or cermet interlayer is disposed between the porous support region and the dense electrolyte. This interlayer may function as an electrode. In certain embodiments, the porous and dense support regions are made of the same material (e.g., both are Ni—YSZ, or Cu—YSZ, or stainless steel). The device may be of any geometry, including planar and tubular geometries. In certain embodiments, solid oxide fuel cells are provided.


Another aspect of the invention relates to a method of fabricating an electrochemical device structure having an integrated seal. The method involves providing a support structure green body configured such that upon sintering, adjacent dense and porous support regions are formed; coating at least a portion of the support structure green body with a green electrolyte material; and cosintering the support structure green body and green electrolyte material such that a) a support having adjacent porous and dense support regions is formed, b) the dense support region and the electrolyte become substantially gas impermeable, and c) an integrated gas-tight seal is formed at an electrolyte/dense support region interface.


In certain embodiments, prior to coating a portion of the support structure green body with a green electrolyte material, green interlayer material is deposited on at least a portion of the support structure green body. The green electrolyte material is then deposited on the interlayer as well as a portion of the green support structure.


In certain embodiments, after sintering, the dense support region is attached to an external metal seal, housing, manifold or fitting such that the seal, housing, manifold or fitting does not contact the electrolyte. The external seal, etc. may also be sintered to the dense support region during the cosintering operation.


These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be presented in more detail in the following specification of the invention and the accompanying figures which illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic of a conventional seal used in a solid oxide fuel cell stack.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of electrochemical device structure having an integrated seal in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 3
a-3d are schematics of electrochemical device structures having an integrated seal in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 4
a-4c are schematics showing placement of integrated seals in tubular devices in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 4
d and 4e are cross-sectional schematics of electrode and electrolyte layers in tubular devices in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a process flow sheet depicting stages of a process of fabricating electrochemical device structures in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a method of fabricating an electrochemical device having an integrated seal in which the dense support is cosintered to an external component in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows images of a YSZ electrolyte film cosintered on a ferritic stainless steel support forming an integrated seal in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to specific embodiments of the invention. Examples of the specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to such specific embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the scope of the appended claims. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


Electrochemical devices generally have an ion-conducting electrolyte sandwiched between a porous anode and cathode in fuel cell applications. (Although a fuel cell is used as an example of an electrochemical device for purposes of illustration, it will be understood that the electrochemical device structures described herein include oxygen generators, syn-gas generators, hydrogen gas separators and similar devices.)


The present invention provides electrochemical device structures having integrated seals and methods of fabricating them. The integrated seal separates the atmosphere on one side of the electrolyte (e.g., air) from the atmosphere on the other side of the electrolyte (e.g., fuel). The devices generally have a support layer including a porous support member or region and a dense support member or region on which a solid electrolyte is disposed. By cosintering the electrolyte, dense support and porous support, an integrated seal exists at the porous support/dense support and the electrolyte/dense support interfaces. As used herein, “dense” support or electrolyte region refers to a support or electrolyte that is substantially free of connected porosity such that it is substantially gas-tight.



FIG. 1 shows a typical design of a conventional device structure in which an external seal is sealed against the dense electrolyte. In addition to preventing atmospheres 1 and 2 from mixing, the external seal seals the device to a manifold. The external seal may also seal the device to another device or to a metal housing. Sealing the external seal directly against the electrolyte severely limits the seal material and method of sealing. For example, the material must wet or conform to the electrolyte surface, be chemically compatible with the electrolyte, and be applied by processes that do not deteriorate the electrolyte. Moreover, it requires matching the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the external and electrolyte materials to avoid causing undesirable stress in the electrolyte.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of electrochemical device having an integrated seal in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention. The dense electrolyte 201 is on a porous support 203. An end or perimeter portion of the dense electrolyte 201 on a dense support 207, forming an electrolyte/dense support interface 209. The porous support and the dense support are part of the same layer and contact each other at a porous support/dense support interface 211. Interfaces 209 and 211 form an integrated seal that keeps atmospheres 1 and 2 from mixing. In order to prevent atmospheres 1 and 2 from mixing, the dense electrolyte seals against the dense support. The dense support is substantially free of connected porosity and cracks such that it is substantially gas-tight, i.e., it has an acceptably low leak rate between atmospheres 1 and 2. (Depending on the material, the density, i.e., the percentage of bulk volume of a network that is filled by solid material, may be at least 80%, 90%, 95%, etc. to make the material substantially free of connected porosity.) The porous support is porous enough to allow sufficient permeation of atmosphere 2 through the support so that the electrochemical reaction may occur.


As is discussed further below, the porous support and dense support are made of the same material type, typically either both a metal or both a cermet. In certain embodiments, they are both the same material, e.g., ferritic stainless steel.


In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 2, the dense support extends beyond the electrolyte and attaches to an external seal 213. The external seal in turn is joined to a metal housing 215. The external seal is typically a metal; because the external seal is sealed against the dense support and not the electrolyte, the choice of metal or other material is not limited by electrolyte compatibility considerations, such as CTE matching. Note that in conventional device shown in FIG. 1, the external seal both prevents mixing of atmosphere 1 and atmosphere 2 and mounts the device against the metal housing. These functions are separated in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 2: the integrated seal prevents mixing atmosphere 1 and atmosphere 2 while the external seal is used to connect or mount the device to the metal housing.


In certain embodiments the porous support is a porous electrode. Electrode supported cells can be either anode supported or cathode supported. The electrode supports are typically a metal, e.g., a metal alloy, or a ceramic metal composite (cermet). Examples of metals that may be used include nickel, copper, iron, chromium, titanium, stainless steel and chromium containing nickel alloys. Examples of cermets that may be used include Ni—YSZ and Cu—YSZ. In certain embodiments, the support layer provides mechanical support but is not an electrode. For example, a support may be composed of an inexpensive high strength material, such as a metal, with an electrode layer is composed of a material having high electrocatalytic activity for a specific purpose, for example methane reformation, oxygen reduction or hydrogen oxidation. (Examples of structures in which an interlayer disposed between the porous support and the dense electrolyte functions as an anode are discussed further below with reference to FIGS. 3c-3d.)


The dense support material is of the same type as the porous support, e.g., the dense support and porous support are metal/metal or cermet/cermet. If metal, the dense and porous supports may be the same metal or alloy or may be different metals or alloys. Similarly, if cermet, the dense and porous supports may be the same or different cermets. The support can have a sharp boundary between the dense and porous sections, or can be a graded structure that changes from porous or dense over some distance.



FIGS. 3
a-3d show schematic representations of various implementations of supports and electrolytes in which the electrolyte is sealed against a dense support in accordance with the invention. FIG. 3a shows an assembly as depicted in FIG. 2, with dense electrolyte 301 overlaying porous support 303 and an end or perimeter portion of the dense electrolyte 301 on a dense support 307. Electrolyte/dense support and porous support/dense support interfaces 309 and 311 are also indicated. The dense support area 307 has an exposed area 313 that is not covered by the electrolyte. This exposed area may be used for attachment to an external member or housing as described above.


As indicated above, in certain embodiments, an interlayer is disposed between the support and electrolyte. FIGS. 3b-3d each show a device structure having a porous interlayer 315. The porous interlayer may be a ceramic, cermet or metal interlayer. In one example, the porous interlayer is a ceramic or cermet interlayer, e.g., a YSZ or Ni—YSZ interlayer, which may function as an electrode and/or aid the spray deposition of a smooth, continuous, thin electrolyte film by bridging the metal particles of the porous support. Various embodiments of this invention include the presence or absence of this interlayer. If the interlayer is present, it may be present over part of just the porous support region (FIG. 3b), it may be present over all of the porous support region (FIG. 3c), or it may span the dense/porous support interface (FIG. 3d).


In certain embodiments, the dense support is connected to an external seal, as is shown in FIG. 2, which may then connect, directly or through additional members, to a housing, manifold, another device (e.g., in a multi-cell stack), etc. In certain embodiments, the dense support may connect directly to the housing or other structure, e.g., by threading, crimping, insertion into a hole in the housing, or other type of bonding or attachment, including welding and brazing.


Typically, the electrolyte contacts only an internal portion of the dense support region surface, with the end or perimeter of the support extending beyond the electrolyte. The internal portion of the dense support is sealed to the electrolyte, with the external portion available to bond to an external seal. In certain embodiments, however, the dense support may not extend further than the electrolyte. An external seal can be attached to the surfaces of the support away from the electrolyte.


The integrated seal is applicable to any device geometry, including planar and tubular geometries. A single device may contain one or multiple integrated seals. The integrated seal exists anywhere the perimeter of the electrolyte overlays a dense part of the support. For example, FIGS. 4a-4c shows various embodiments of an integrated seal in a tubular device. Area 450 represents the portion of the dense support region that contacts an overlaying electrolyte. The integrated seal may be at the perimeter of the device (FIG. 4a), an interior section of the device (FIG. 4b), or an area that contacts both the perimeter and interior of the device (FIG. 4c). A single device may contain one or more integrated seals. For instance, a tube may have an integrated seal as shown in FIG. 4a at one or both ends. Similarly a device may have one or multiple integrated seals in the device interior; FIG. 4b shows two such interior seals. A device may also be sealed at an end as in FIG. 4a and at an interior location as in FIG. 4b or 4c. Note that in the embodiments shown in FIGS. 4b and 4c, another seal may be used to seal the perimeter of the device.



FIG. 4
d shows a cross-sectional schematic view of an electrolyte and electrode layers in an example of tubular structure of FIG. 4b or 4c. An external electrode layer 405, dense electrolyte 401 and an internal support layer including porous internal portion 403 and a dense portion 407 are shown. The dense portion 407 is sealed to the dense electrolyte 401, with a dense electrolyte/dense support interface or boundary is indicated at 409. In other embodiments, the support having dense and porous regions may be on the external part of the tubular structure (e.g., layer 405 in FIG. 4d may be a support layer with dense and porous regions). According to various embodiments, the tubular device may also include other components including internal and/or external current collectors, catalysis layers, external seals, metal housing (not shown). Dense region 407 is a contact point for electrical and/or mechanical attachment (e.g., allowing electrical access to interior layer 403), enabled by the integrated seal at the interface of dense region 407 and electrolyte 401. The dense region 407 may be recessed or flush with respect to electrolyte 401 (as in FIG. 4d), or it may be proud of electrolyte 401 (as in FIG. 4e, described further below).


According to various embodiments, the exposed dense support areas, both at the perimeter (as in FIGS. 4a and 4b) and in the interior (as in FIGS. 4b and 4c) of the device, may be used as attachment points for mechanical support such as a tube sheet or connecting rod. Also, as indicated above, in certain embodiments the exposed dense support areas are used as electrical contact points for exchanging voltage or current with the device. FIG. 4e shows cross-sectional schematic view of a tubular structure with an electrical connection 417. Dense portion 407 is connected to the electrical connection 417 and functions as an electrical contact point to the interior of the device. Note that in this embodiment, the dense portion 407 is proud of the electrolyte 401, which can facilitate electrical contact. Examples of uses of these electrical contact points include device monitoring and control, as the current path for connecting multiple devices in series and/or parallel, and as current extraction points to alleviate total device current restrictions imposed by edge current collection.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart depicting stages of a process of fabricating electrochemical device structures having integrated seals according to certain embodiments of the present invention. First, in an operation 501, a support structure green body is provided. The support structure includes both the porous and dense areas as described above. It may be a single material having porous and dense areas, or it may be different materials placed adjacent to each other. At this point in the process, however, the structure is green; that is, it has not yet been fired to a temperature sufficiently high to sinter the materials. Providing the support structure green body may involve preparing powders or particles for the dense region and porous region. Porosity can be controlled by factors including particle size and/or the use and amount of poreformer. The support structure green body may then be formed, e.g., by loading or placing the dense powder (i.e., the powder that is to become the dense section) and porous powder into a mold or die such that the dense powder is placed at the end or perimeter or otherwise appropriately placed. The support structure green body may then be bisque fired or otherwise treated to create handling strength.


Once the support structure green body is formed, an interlayer is optionally deposited on the support structure green body in an operation 503. As described above, the interlayer may cover all or part of the porous area of the support structure, and may span the dense/porous interface. An area of the dense support structure surface is left exposed to seal against the electrolyte. In one example, a YSZ interlayer is formed by dipcoating from a slurry of YSZ and poreformer particles. Other known methods of coating or depositing may be used.


Then, in an operation 505, an electrolyte film is deposited on the interlayer surface (if present) and the desired areas of the green support structure, including at least a portion of the exposed dense area surface. As discussed above with reference to FIG. 2, in many embodiments the electrolyte contacts only a portion of the dense support with the remainder of the dense support free for bonding to an external seal, manifold, metal housing, etc. Any appropriate method of depositing the electrolyte may be used. In one example, aerosol spraying is used to spray a YSZ electrolyte onto the surface.


The support layer structure having dense and porous regions, the interlayer, if present, and electrolyte are then cosintered in an operation 507. During this process, all of the components shrink. The end area of the support structure becomes dense, the electrolyte becomes dense, and the electrolyte and the dense end of the support structure are joined through mechanical interlocking to produce a seal at that interface. The layers of the resulting structure may be said to be cosintered: e.g., cosintering of the electrolyte and dense support region produces an electrolyte layer cosintered to the dense support region. Note that unlike conventional methods this electrolyte/support seal is created during fabrication and not as a later step. This has benefits for inexpensive and easy manufacturing. Moreover, because the seal is integrated, sealing performance and lifetime are expected to increase. By densifying the end of the support structure, the cosintering operation produces a seal at the dense and porous support interface. As indicated above, this interface boundary may be sharp or graduated.


Effective cosintering the electrolyte in contact with the dense support region creates significant mechanical interlocking between the two providing an integrated hermetic seal. Effective cosintering of the electrolyte, porous support region and dense support region is facilitated through selection of appropriate materials, particle size, sintering schedule and poreformer/binder additives. The particle size and green density of the support are chosen so that after sintering, the porous region is porous and the dense region sinters to near full density. Support materials having similar shrinkage to the electrolyte may be used. CTE matching between the support and electrolyte is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,605,316, titled “Structures And Fabrication Techniques For Solid State Electrochemical Devices,” incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. As indicated, the support materials may be selected to have a good CTE match with the electrolyte. Note that CTE matching between the support and electrolyte (2 materials) is easier than CTE matching between the support, electrolyte and a seal material (3 materials) that may be required with prior art methods.


Examples of electrolyte materials include stabilized zirconias, including zirconias having about 1-11 mol % of one of the following dopants: yttria, calcia, scandia, ceria, and combinations thereof.


In certain embodiments, using the same material for the porous and dense regions of the support aids in effective cosintering. For example, stainless steel metal may be used for both regions. Particle size, addition and amount of poreformer and green density may be different for the porous and dense support regions.


After the sintering operation, the dense area of the support may be optionally shaped and/or attached to an external seal, metal housing, fitting, etc. in an operation 509. As indicated, the dense support typically has an exposed area, which is not in contact with the electrolyte. See, e.g., area 313 in FIGS. 3a-3d. In certain embodiments, this area may be shaped to aid fitting to an external seal, manifold, etc. The exposed dense area of the support may be shaped by net-shape sintering, machining or otherwise shaping after sintering, and addition of other parts by fastening, welding, brazing, diffusion bonding, etc. For instance, the dense butt end of the tube in FIG. 4a may be threaded, contain a lip, protrusion, depression, etc. that aligns or assists in joining the device to an external surface such as a manifold or second device. This may be a permanent method of joining or may assist in providing mechanical integrity during further production operations. For example, the dense support could have pins rising from its surface that interlock with slots in a manifold or second device. These could provide stability and alignment during a later brazing, welding, crimping, or other operation Likewise the interior dense support section in FIG. 4b may have a protrusion or depression that facilitates electrical or mechanical connection to other devices, manifolds, electrical conduits, etc.


In certain embodiments, the dense support area contacts an external object during sintering, where the external object is made of a material that will sinter-bond with the dense support. For example, the tube of FIG. 3a could have a flared or threaded tubular fitting disposed inside the dense area of the tube. During the sintering operation (described above with reference to block 507 of FIG. 5), if the fitting and dense support materials are compatible, the tube would shrink down onto this fitting and bond to it. Metals may be particularly appropriate for this method. A schematic example of joining a tubular structure to an external object by cosintering is shown in FIG. 6, which shows a cross-section of the tubular device before and after sintering. Porous and dense metal support powders are molded into a tubular form. A dense electrolyte powder—YSZ powder in the example shown—overlays the porous support powder and part of the dense support powder. An external part, e.g., a manifold, fitting, fastener, seal, etc., is disposed inside the dense support. The entire structure is cosintered, densifying the dense support powder and bonding it to the fitting.


The methods described above allow high-temperature electrochemical devices to be sealed or joined to materials that are not compatible with the electrolyte.


EXAMPLES

The following examples are intended to illustrate various aspects of the invention, and do not limit the invention in any way.


Example 1
YSZ Electrolyte with Integrated Seal on Ferritic Stainless Steel Support

A thin, fully dense yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte layer was cosintered onto a ferritic stainless steel support. Cross-sectional images of the resulting structure are shown in FIG. 7. The particle size and green density of the support were chosen such that after sintering, the main body of the support was porous, whereas the end of the support sintered to near full density. The images show the end of the support as well as a small section of the main body. The YSZ cosintered to become a continuous dense layer that spanned the porous and dense parts of the metal support. Significant mechanical interlocking was achieved between the YSZ and dense metal, creating a hermetic seal at that interface. A porous YSZ interlayer was interposed between the dense YSZ film and the porous metal and a section of the dense metal support. This layer aided aerosol spray deposition of a smooth, continuous, thin YSZ film.


The structure shown in FIG. 7 was prepared according to the following method. Other methods for achieving a similar structure are within the scope of this invention.


1. Produce Metal Support Molding Powder


Water-atomized ferritic stainless steel particles were mixed with acrylic binder and polyethylene glycol 6000 poreformer, ground, and sieved to 150 μm agglomerates. The metal particles for the porous section of the support were 25-38 μm, and were mixed with 17 vol % binder and 59 vol % poreformer. These parameters were chosen so as to create a low green density compatible with retaining adequate porosity after cosintering. The metal particles for the dense section were <25 μm, and were mixed with 17 vol % binder and 26 vol % poreformer. These parameters were chosen to allow near-full density after cosintering, and a total shrinkage during cosintering that is similar to that of the YSZ film and porous metal support (˜20-24% linear shrinkage).


2. Produce Metal Support Green Body


The metal support molding powder was loaded into a tubular mold such that only the end section of the tube contained the powder which was to become the dense section. The powder was compacted by cold isostatic pressing.


3. Deposit Interlayer (Optional)


After debiding and bisque-firing the metal support to create handling strength, the porous YSZ interlayer was deposited by dipcoating from a slurry of YSZ and acrylic performer particles.


4. Deposit YSZ Electrolyte Film


The electrolyte film was deposited by aerosol spraying onto the interlayer surface and exposed area of green dense support.


5. Cosinter


The entire structure was cosintered in reducing atmosphere at 1300° C. During this process all of the components shrank, the end of the support tube became dense, the electrolyte became dense, and the electrolyte and dense tube end were joined through mechanical interlocking to produce a hermetic (gas-tight) seal at that interface.


Example 2
Seal Quality Assessment

Several tubes with integrated seals were prepared according to the procedure outlined in Example 1. Stainless steel caps and manifolds were brazed onto the exposed dense metal tube ends. The electrolyte was not contacted by the braze. The hermeticity of the seal was then evaluated by bubble testing with 10 psi air inside the tube and acetone outside the tube. All integrated seal areas were air-tight.


Example 3
Addition of Cu to Stainless Steel Support

Two support specimens were prepared to demonstrate the effect of Cu addition to stainless steel support. The supports were prepared similarly to those in Example 1. The first comprised 10 g P434L 38-45 μm stainless steel powder, 2 g acrylic solution (15 wt % in water), 1.5 g acrylic poreformer beads (53-76 μm), and 0.5 g PEG6000. The second was identical except that 10 wt % of the stainless steel was replaced with Cu powder. Samples of both supports were sintered to 1100° C. and 1300° C. After sintering at 1100° C., the sample with Cu shrank 4.5%, whereas the sample with no Cu shrank 3.6%. The conductivity of the samples sintered at 1300° C. was measured in moist H2 atmosphere. The sample with Cu provided 10.8 kS/cm, whereas the sample with no Cu provided 5.6 kS/cm. After sintering, a mixture of stainless steel-rich and Cu-rich regions of the Cu-containing support was observed, indicating incomplete alloying of the two phases.


From this example, it is clear that addition of a small amount of Cu to the stainless steel support can provide increased shrinkage at the initial stages of sintering, and improved conductivity of the final sintered support. The increased shrinkage may be used to improve the shrinkage match between the electrolyte film and the dense or porous support areas. The improved conductivity may improve in-plane conduction throughout the porous support, and is especially useful at the dense area of the support if the dense area is used as a contact to exchange current with the device. It is also expected that the ductility of the Cu will improve contact resistance and sealing, especially if the dense support area contains Cu and is forcibly contacted to the neighboring device, housing, current connection, etc.


Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and compositions of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein.

Claims
  • 1. An electrochemical device structure, comprising: first and second electrodes separated by a dense electrolyte;a support comprising dense metal and porous metal support regions, wherein said dense metal and porous metal support regions share a dense support/porous support interface;the dense electrolyte disposed on at least a portion of the dense support region to form an electrolyte/dense support interface;the electrolyte/dense support interface and dense support/porous support interface forming a gas tight seal between the first electrode and the second electrode.
  • 2. The electrochemical device structure of claim 1 wherein the metal is stainless steel.
  • 3. The electrochemical device structure of claim 1 further comprising an external sealing member connected to the dense support region.
  • 4. The electrochemical device structure of claim 3 wherein the external sealing member in not in physical contact with the dense electrolyte.
  • 5. The electrochemical device structure of claim 3 wherein the external sealing member is disposed between the dense support and a metal housing or a manifold.
  • 6. The electrochemical device structure of claim 3 wherein the dense support is fitted to a metal housing or member, wherein said housing or member is not in physical contact with the dense electrolyte.
  • 7. The electrochemical device structure of claim 1 further comprising a ceramic or cermet interlayer disposed between the porous support region and the dense electrolyte.
  • 8. The electrochemical device structure of claim 7 further wherein one of the porous electrodes comprises the interlayer.
  • 9. The electrochemical device structure of claim 8 wherein the interlayer spans the dense support/porous support interface.
  • 10. The electrochemical device structure of claim 8 wherein the interlayer is not in physical contact with the dense support region.
  • 11. The electrochemical device structure of claim 1 the dense support/porous support interface comprises a graded pore structure.
  • 12. The electrochemical device structure of claim 1 wherein the dense and porous support regions comprise the same material.
  • 13. A method of fabricating an electrochemical device structure, said device structure comprising a support having dense metal and porous metal support regions and comprising at least one integrated gas-tight seal between an electrolyte and the dense metal support region, said method comprising: providing a support structure green body, said green body configured such that upon sintering, adjacent dense metal and porous metal support regions are formed;coating at least a portion of the support structure green body with a green electrolyte material; andcosintering the support structure green body and green electrolyte material such that the support having adjacent porous metal and dense metal support regions is formed, the dense metal support region and the electrolyte become substantially gas impermeable, and an integrated gas-tight seal is formed at an electrolyte/dense metal support region interface.
  • 14. An electrochemical device structure, comprising: first and second electrodes separated by a dense electrolyte;a porous metal support region cosintered in contact with dense metal support region to form a gas impermeable dense support/porous support interface;the dense electrolyte cosintered in contact with at least a portion of the dense support region to form a gas impermeable electrolyte/dense support interface;the electrolyte/dense support interface and dense support/porous support interface forming a gas tight seal between the first electrode and the second electrode.
  • 15. The electrochemical device structure of claim 14 further comprising an external sealing member connected to the dense support region.
  • 16. The electrochemical device structure of claim 15 wherein the external sealing member in not in physical contact with the dense electrolyte.
  • 17. The electrochemical device structure of claim 15 wherein the external sealing member is disposed between the dense support and a metal housing or a manifold.
  • 18. The electrochemical device structure of claim 14 wherein the dense support is fitted to a metal housing or member, wherein said housing or member is not in physical contact with the dense electrolyte.
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 awarded by the United States Department of Energy to The Regents of the University of California for the management and operation of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The government has certain rights in this invention.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2008/066737 6/12/2008 WO 00 1/7/2011
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2009/128849 10/22/2009 WO A
US Referenced Citations (153)
Number Name Date Kind
3126311 Harris Mar 1964 A
3324543 McVey et al. Jun 1967 A
3402230 White Sep 1968 A
3525646 Tannenberger et al. Aug 1970 A
3668010 Falley et al. Jun 1972 A
3773549 Elbert Nov 1973 A
4035547 Heller et al. Jul 1977 A
4560607 Sumner Dec 1985 A
4562124 Ruka Dec 1985 A
4578214 Jungerhans Mar 1986 A
4624897 Ito Nov 1986 A
4687717 Kaun et al. Aug 1987 A
4720335 Fukushima et al. Jan 1988 A
4763828 Fukaya et al. Aug 1988 A
4847172 Maskalick et al. Jul 1989 A
4917958 Akai et al. Apr 1990 A
4929294 Blome May 1990 A
4942999 Oda et al. Jul 1990 A
5013612 Hunt et al. May 1991 A
5043229 Mizuhara Aug 1991 A
5085720 Mikeska et al. Feb 1992 A
5127969 Sekhar Jul 1992 A
5173372 Matsuo et al. Dec 1992 A
5236787 Grassi Aug 1993 A
5240480 Thorogood et al. Aug 1993 A
5279909 Horner et al. Jan 1994 A
5306411 Mazanec et al. Apr 1994 A
5318951 Shintaku et al. Jun 1994 A
5328779 Tannenberger et al. Jul 1994 A
5366770 Wang Nov 1994 A
5409784 Bromberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5441825 Barlow Aug 1995 A
5480739 Kawasaki et al. Jan 1996 A
5487803 Sweeney et al. Jan 1996 A
5589285 Cable et al. Dec 1996 A
5599383 Dyer et al. Feb 1997 A
5616223 Shen et al. Apr 1997 A
5626914 Ritland et al. May 1997 A
5629103 Wersing et al. May 1997 A
5633081 Cough et al. May 1997 A
5670270 Wallin Sep 1997 A
5672848 Komorita et al. Sep 1997 A
5686198 Kuo et al. Nov 1997 A
5735332 Ritland et al. Apr 1998 A
5741605 Gillett et al. Apr 1998 A
5750279 Carolan et al. May 1998 A
5787578 Farooq et al. Aug 1998 A
5827620 Kendall Oct 1998 A
5908713 Ruka et al. Jun 1999 A
5932368 Batawi et al. Aug 1999 A
5938822 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5976216 Samal et al. Nov 1999 A
5993986 Wallin et al. Nov 1999 A
6007683 Jankowski et al. Dec 1999 A
6017647 Wallin Jan 2000 A
6188582 Peter Feb 2001 B1
6217732 Schuh et al. Apr 2001 B1
6270642 Basu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6293978 Kleefisch et al. Sep 2001 B2
6296910 Choy et al. Oct 2001 B1
6344291 Hitomi Feb 2002 B1
6348273 Ishikawa et al. Feb 2002 B1
6358567 Pham et al. Mar 2002 B2
6368383 Virkar et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372078 Melchert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6390354 Makino et al. May 2002 B1
6420064 Ghosh et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428920 Badding et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440578 Shinkai et al. Aug 2002 B1
6492050 Sammes Dec 2002 B1
6541146 Xue et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565621 Shinkai et al. May 2003 B2
6576363 Hitomi Jun 2003 B1
6589680 Gorte et al. Jul 2003 B1
6605316 Visco et al. Aug 2003 B1
6653009 Wang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656625 Thompson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6682842 Visco et al. Jan 2004 B1
6742700 Makino et al. Jun 2004 B2
6767622 Hada et al. Jul 2004 B2
6767662 Jacobson et al. Jul 2004 B2
6783880 Christiansen Aug 2004 B2
6800323 Pan Oct 2004 B2
6846511 Visco et al. Jan 2005 B2
6887361 Visco et al. May 2005 B1
6896992 Kearl May 2005 B2
6974516 Devoe et al. Dec 2005 B2
6979511 Visco et al. Dec 2005 B2
6994884 Guan et al. Feb 2006 B1
7055733 Weil et al. Jun 2006 B2
7118777 Visco et al. Oct 2006 B2
7153559 Ito et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163713 Jacobson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7208246 Herman et al. Apr 2007 B2
7218502 Fujii et al. May 2007 B2
7232626 Jacobson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7273673 Akikusa et al. Sep 2007 B2
7351488 Visco et al. Apr 2008 B2
7553573 Visco et al. Jun 2009 B2
8287673 Tucker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8343686 Tucker et al. Jan 2013 B2
20010012576 Christiansen et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020028367 Sammes et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048699 Steele et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020081762 Jacobson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020177031 Doshi et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030021900 Jacobson et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024611 Cornie et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030059668 Visco et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030132270 Weil et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030188637 Ito et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030224234 Steele et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040023101 Jacobson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040028994 Akikusa et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040112478 Bieler et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040115416 Nonninger et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040135324 Brule et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040219423 Tunney et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040231143 Visco et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240142 Fujii et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000621 Devoe et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022921 Morrison et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050037252 Pham Feb 2005 A1
20050048343 Thirukkvalur Mar 2005 A1
20050095479 Mardilovich et al. May 2005 A1
20050147857 Crumm et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050170234 Liu et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050214612 Visco et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050214616 Kumar et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050221153 Sugimoto et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050271931 Finnerty Dec 2005 A1
20060029860 Ketcham et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060051643 Sarkar et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057295 Visco et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060119669 Sharma et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060153974 Matsuzaki et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060228615 Armstrong et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060234112 Visco et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070059576 Jacobson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070117006 Zhan et al. May 2007 A1
20070148503 Okazaki Jun 2007 A1
20070166603 Nakanishi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20080118804 Tucker et al. May 2008 A1
20080131723 Tucker et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080254335 Torgerson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268323 Tucker et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090148743 Day et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090220765 Okamura et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100038012 Tucker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100143824 Tucker et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110053041 Tucker et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110269047 Tucker et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120325678 Visco et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (76)
Number Date Country
1471741 Jan 2004 CN
1498877 May 2004 CN
101065860 Oct 2007 CN
200580040834.4 Aug 2009 CN
200580041105.0 Dec 2009 CN
428275 May 1991 EP
562724 Sep 1993 EP
1122806 Aug 2001 EP
1699104 Sep 2006 EP
2250295 Jan 2012 EP
1585403 Jan 1970 FR
1276615 Jun 1972 GB
1383343 Dec 1974 GB
2156257 Nov 1984 GB
59-046695 Sep 1980 JP
56-002549 Jan 1981 JP
59-015960 Jan 1984 JP
59-016695 Jan 1984 JP
60-090875 May 1985 JP
05-089883 Apr 1993 JP
05-163078 Jun 1993 JP
06-042990 Feb 1994 JP
40-7006768 Jan 1995 JP
07-069749 Mar 1995 JP
07-126079 May 1995 JP
07-237980 Sep 1995 JP
07-267747 Oct 1995 JP
09-092301 Apr 1997 JP
09-188582 Jul 1997 JP
09-296203 Nov 1997 JP
10-021931 Jan 1998 JP
11-292618 Oct 1999 JP
11-297333 Oct 1999 JP
2001-126745 May 2001 JP
2002-289249 Oct 2002 JP
2002-301588 Oct 2002 JP
2003-288913 Oct 2003 JP
2004-039574 Feb 2004 JP
2004-047598 Feb 2004 JP
2004-127761 Apr 2004 JP
2004-142971 May 2004 JP
2004-164864 Jun 2004 JP
2004-207088 Jul 2004 JP
2004-273736 Sep 2004 JP
2005-288526 Oct 2005 JP
2005-353493 Dec 2005 JP
536922 Nov 1976 RU
1407675 Jul 1988 RU
1822388 Jun 1993 RU
2197441 Jan 2003 RU
2216602 Nov 2003 RU
2236331 Sep 2004 RU
9700734 Sep 1997 WO
9952165 Oct 1999 WO
9952165 Oct 1999 WO
9965642 Dec 1999 WO
9966570 Dec 1999 WO
0034539 Jun 2000 WO
0052780 Sep 2000 WO
0235634 May 2002 WO
03007312 Jan 2003 WO
2004008556 Jan 2004 WO
2004070858 Aug 2004 WO
2006044313 Apr 2006 WO
2006082057 Aug 2006 WO
2006086037 Aug 2006 WO
2006091250 Aug 2006 WO
2006086037 Aug 2006 WO
2006116153 Nov 2006 WO
2006127045 Nov 2006 WO
2008016345 Feb 2008 WO
2009014775 Jan 2009 WO
2009099447 Aug 2009 WO
2009128849 Oct 2009 WO
2010030300 Mar 2010 WO
2011127283 Oct 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (156)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 61/046,313, “Integrated seal for high-temperature electrochemical device”, Tucker et al., filed Apr. 18, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,987, “CU-based cermet for high-temperature electrochemical device”, Tucker et al., filed Feb. 4, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/026,079, “CU-based cermet for high-temperature electrochemical device”, Tucker et al., filed Feb. 4, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/096,177, “Metal-supported, segmented-in-series high temperature electrochemical device”, Tucker et al., filed Sep. 11, 2008.
CN patent application No. 200580040834.4, Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2008.
CN patent application No. 200580041105.0, Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2008.
CN patent application No. 200580040834.4, Notification to grant patent right for invention, mailed Apr. 17, 2009.
CA patent application No. 2,627,786, Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010.
CN patent application No. 200580041105.0, Notification to grant patent right for invention, mailed Aug. 28, 2009.
AU patent application No. 2005332026, Exam Report mailed Sep. 29, 2010.
AU patent application No. 2005327925, Office Action mailed Jul. 5, 2010.
AU patent application No. 2005327164, Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2010.
EP patent application No. 05857980.6, Supplemental Search Report mailed Dec. 15, 2009.
EP patent application No. 05857595.2, Search Report mailed Oct. 15, 2009.
EP patent application No. 05857587.9, Supplemental Search Report mailed Oct. 26, 2009.
JP patent application No. 2007-543481, Exam Report mailed Oct. 5, 2010.
JP patent application No. 2007-543481, Notification of reasons for rejection mailed Oct. 5, 2010 (English translation).
Translated excerpt from JP2005-288526.
Translated excerpt from JP2004-047598.
MY patent application No. PI 20055578, Examination Report mailed Aug. 14, 2009.
RU patent application No. 2007124484-02, Office Action mailed Nov. 16, 2009.
TW patent application No. 094141561, Examination Report mailed Mar. 8, 2010.
RU patent application No. 200712448309, Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2009.
CN patent application No. 200680055443.4, Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010.
RU patent application No. 200910693002, Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010.
VN patent application No. 1-2007-01278, Exam Report mailed Jul. 7, 2007.
VN patent application No. 1-2007-01267, Exam Report mailed Jul. 29, 2009.
WO patent application No. PCT/US05/42995 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 26, 2006.
WO patent application No. PCT/US05/43109 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 12, 2006.
WO patent application No. PCT/US05/42572, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 29, 2006.
WO patent application No. PCT/US05/042572, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jun. 14, 2006.
WO patent application No. PCT/US2006/029580, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 3, 2008.
WO patent application No. PCT/US2008/060362, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 12, 2009.
WO patent application No. PCT/US2008/066737, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 29, 2009.
WO patent application No. PCT/US2008/053869, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 29, 2008.
WO patent application No. PCT/US2008/081531, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 31, 2009.
Naka, Masaaki et al., “Joining of plain carbon steel to alumina with copper filler metal”, XP009010006, Nov. 1985.
Stevenson, Jeff, “SOFC Seals: Materials Status”, SSECA core technology program—SOFC meeting, Jul. 8, 2003.
Lee, Sungkyu et al., “Fabrication and characterization of Cu/YSZ cermet high-temperature electrolysis cathode material prepared by high-energy ball-milling method I.900° C-sintered”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 448 (2008) 363-367.
Gorte, Raymond J. et al., “Anodes for direct oxidation of dry hydrocarbons in a solid-oxide fuel cell”, Advanced materials, 2000, 12, No. 19, Oct. 2, 2000.
Park, Seungdoo et al., “Direct oxidation of hydrocarbons in a solid oxide fuel cell I. methane oxidation”, Journal of the Eclectrochemical Society, 146 (10) 3603-3605 (19990.
Li, J.Q. et al., “Fabrication and thermal properties of a YSZ-NiCr joint with an interlayer of YSZ-NiCr functionally graded material”, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 23 (2003) 1847-1853.
Zhou, Xia et al., “Fabrication of composite alloy cladding material by brazing process”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 168 (2005) 280-285.
Zhu, Minguang et al., “Improving the strength of brazed joints to alumina by adding carbon fibres”, Chapman & Hall, 0022-2461, 1997, pp. 5321-5333, Apr. 17, 1997.
Blugan, Gurdial et al., “Brazing of silicon nitride ceramic composite to steel using SiC-particle-reinforced active brazing alloy”, Ceramics International, 0272-8842, 2006, Elsevier Ltd.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,269, Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,258, Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2011.
European Examination Report mailed Feb. 14, 2011, for Application No. 08 768 912.1-3122.
JP patent application No. 2007-543579, Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011.
European Examination Report mailed Jun. 17, 2011 for Application No. 08770865.7.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,258, Office Action mailed Aug. 18, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,269, Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/304,191, Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011.
EP patent application No. 05857587.9, Examination Report mailed Aug. 15, 2011.
MY patent application No. PI 20055579, Substantive Examination Adverse Report mailed Aug. 15, 2011.
CN patent application No. 200680055443.4, Second Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2011.
PH patent application No. 12008502790, Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2011.
EP patent application No. 08826523.6, Extended Search Report mailed Aug. 30, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,270, Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,258, Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2011.
JP patent application No. 2007-543579, Final Decision of Rejection mailed Oct. 4, 2011.
CA patent application No. 2,627,863, Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2011.
JP patent application No. 2007-543481, Office Action mailed Nov. 29, 2011.
JP patent application No. 2009-521730, Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011.
RU patent application No. 2010147046/20(067957), Office Action of the Formal Examination mailed May 4, 2011.
MY patent application No. PI20055578, substantive examination mailed Dec. 30, 2011.
KR patent application No. 10-2007-7009946, Notification of Provisional Rejection mailed Jan. 20, 2012.
IN patent application No. 2386/KOLN/2007, First Examination Report mailed Jan. 31, 2012.
EP patent application No. 06836096.5, Supplementary European Search Report mailed Feb. 3, 2012.
Ishida et al., NGK Spark Plug Co. Ltd., abstract of JP 19830079832, Thomson Scientific, XP-002667365, Nov. 21, 1984.
Fujiki et al., Kobe Steel Ltd., abstract of JP 19960109959, Thomson Scientific, XP-002667366, Nov. 18, 1997.
AU patent application No. 2008279577, Examiner's first report mailed Jan. 27, 2012.
PH patent application No. 12010500175, Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2012.
RU patent application No. 2010136676/20, Office Action of the Formal Examination mailed Jan. 17, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,270, Office Action mailed Mar. 15, 2012.
TW patent application No. 094141908, Search Report mailed Mar. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/304,191, Notice of Allowance mailed May 14, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/082,320, Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/082,320, Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/082,320, Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,127, Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2004.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,127, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 5, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,558, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 9, 2004.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,788, Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,788, Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,788, Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/042,788, Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 11,042,788, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/626,629, Office Action mailed May 9, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/626,629, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 13, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,812, Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2004.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,812, Office Action mailed Mar. 21, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,812, Notice of Allownce mailed Aug. 3, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,009, Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,009, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 28, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/471,774, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 30, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/027,183, “Structures and fabrication techniques for solid state electrochemical devices,” Visco et al., filed Feb. 6, 2008.
EP1228546, “Structures and fabrication techniques for solid state electrochemical devices,” Visco et al., Aug. 7, 2002, abstract.
Seabaugh et al., “Low-cost fabrication processes for solid oxide fuel cells,” NexTech exhibited at the Fuel Cells 2000 Conference in Protland, Oct. 30, 2000-Nov. 2, 2000, NexTech Materials, Ltd.
Fujii et al., “Manufacturing and characterization of metallic system support tube for solid oxide fuel cells,” Bulletin of the Electrotechnical Laboratory, vol. 62, No. 1-2, 1998, p. 1319.
Momma et al., “High potential performance of tubular type SOFC using metallic system components,” Electrotechnical Laboratory, Electrochemical Proceedings vol. 97-40, Jun. 1997, pp. 310-321.
Okuo et al., “Development of metallic substrate tubular SOFC,” Electrotechnical Laboratory, Oct. 1994, pp. 908-919.
Okua et al., “Improvement in power stability and durability demonstration on new tubular type SOFC using metallic system component,” vol. 60, No. 5, 1996, pp. 1-9.
Schiller et al., “Development of metallic substrate supported thin-film SOFC by applying plasma spray techniques,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 99-19, Oct. 1999, pp. 892-903.
Schiller et al., “Development of plasma sprayed components for a new SOFC Designs,” Electrochemical Proceedings, vol. 97-40, Oct. 1999, pp. 634-645.
Schiller et al., “Development of SOFC components by vacuum plasma spraying,” 1998, pp. 515-518.
Takenoiri et al., “Development of metallic substrate supported planar SOFC at Fuji Electric,” Fuel Cell Seminar Bastracts, Nov. 1998, pp. 84-87.
Unal, et al., “Microstructures of Y2O3-Stabilized ZrO2 Electron Beam-Physical Vapor Deposition Coatings on Ni-Base Superalloys”, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 984-92, 1994, pp. 984-992.
Wallin, et al., “Cofired Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Operation at 800° C”, 1997, Abstract.
Yao, et al, “Improved preparation procedure and properties for a multiplayer piezoelectric thick-film actuator”, Sensors and Actuators A 71, Received Dec. 9, 1997; received in revised form Apr. 27, 1998; accepted May 1, 1998, pp. 139-143.
“Mfg. Oxygen Sensor—Involves Applying Catalyst Metal Salt Soln. To Sintered Electrolyte, Reducing, Firing, Again Applying Metal Salt Soln. and Firing”, Matsushita Elec Ind Co Ltd [MATU], 1979JP-0078760 (Jun. 21, 1979), (abstract), pp. 1-2.
CN patent application No. 200880128414.5, First Office Action issued Mar. 20, 2012.
PH patent application No. 12008502790, Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2012.
RU patent application No. 2010105992/07, Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2012.
PH patent application No. 12010500175, Office Action mailed May 23, 2012.
CN patent application No. 200680055443.4, Third Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,258, Office Action mailed Jun. 7, 2012.
Ishihara et al., “Electrophoretic deposition of Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 electrolyte films in solid oxide fuel cells,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 (4) 913-19 (1996), Jan. 26, 1995.
Ishihara et al., “Electrophoretic deposition of Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 on the porous La0.8Sr02MnO3 cathode substrate for SOFC,” Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Electrochemical Society, 1995.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,258, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 25, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,362, “Structure and fabrication techniques for solid state electrochemical devices,” Visco et al., filed Aug. 30, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/027,183, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 18, 2012.
CN patent application No. 200880108590.2, Office Action mailed Jun. 1, 2012.
PH patent application No. 12008502790, Office Action mailed Jul. 4, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/664,646, Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,270, Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,362, Office Action mailed Nov. 6, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/637,642, “Method of making electrochemical device with porous metal layer,” Tucker et al., filed Sep. 26, 2012.
ID patent application No. W00201003079, Notification of Result of Substantive Examination Step I mailed Jun. 1, 2012.
ID patent application No. W00201003962, Notification of Result of Substantive Examination Step I mailed Jun. 18, 2012.
EP patent application No. 08826523.6, Examination Report mailed Oct. 23, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/304,191, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 15, 2012.
RU patent application No. 2010147046/07, Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2012.
RU patent application No. 2010105992/07, Resolution on granting patent for invention mailed Sep. 6, 2012.
MY patent application No. PI2010000360, Substantive Examination mailed Dec. 31, 2012.
CN patent application No. 200680055443.4, Fourth Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012.
EP patent application No. 08 768 912.1, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, Intent to Grant, mailed Jul. 14, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/664,646, Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,269, Office Action mailed Mar. 17, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,269, Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2013.
Yaws, Carl L., “Table 1. Physical Properties—inorganic compounds,” Yaws' Critical Property Data for Chemical Engineers and Chemists, Knovel, 2012.
CN patent application No. 200680055443.4, Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2013.
RU patent application No. 2007124482/02, Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2009.
MY patent application No. PI2010004878, Certificate of Grant dated Jan. 31, 2013.
JP patent application No. 2011-504989, Office Action mailed Feb. 19, 2013.
ID patent application No. W-00201003962, Notification of Allowance to be Granted, mailed Oct. 29, 2012.
EP patent application No. 08770865.7, Communication under Rule 71(3) Intent to Grant, mailed Nov. 15, 2011.
CN patent application No. 200880129911.7, First Office Action, mailed Nov. 28, 2012.
RU patent application No. 2009106930, Certificate of Grant, registered Oct. 27, 2011.
PH patent application No. 12008502790, Notice of Allowance, mailed Sep. 7, 2012.
AU patent application No. 2005327925, Notice of Acceptance, mailed Jan. 12, 2011.
PH patent application No. 1/2010/502361, Examination Report mailed Apr. 4, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/791,270, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/599,362, Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/865,956, Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2013.
CN patent application No. 200880108590.2, Second Office Action mailed Apr. 2, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110104586 A1 May 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61046313 Apr 2008 US