The present invention relates to the field of firearms and more particularly relates to a recoil spring lug that features at least one integrated sling attachment loop.
The invention of the personal long firearm provided a valuable tool for the user. However, carrying the firearm quickly became problematic. This problem led to the development of the sling. Early slings used a two point attachment to the firearm, usually at or near the stock and towards the fore end or barrel. Recently, sling systems have developed which attach at only one point of the firearm, usually at the juncture of the stock and receiver. This point is usually provided by an added sling plate, which is a thin plate of metal or other suitable material that fits between the stock and the receiver. A loop extends along the rim of the plate and toward one side or another of the firearm and provides an attachment point for the sling. Ambidextrous sling plates, those having loops on left and right sides of the firearm, provide two mounting options which may be useful in tactical scenarios or simply due to preference of the user. Another plate option has a transverse bar that crosses the face of the sling plate beneath the stock.
The folding stock is another advance in firearm technology. The folding stock is a stock which is hinged and will fold over one side of the firearm. Such stocks add convenience for carrying the firearm in a more compact state while also being easily deployed. However, the combination of a folding stock with a sling plate can be problematic as often the loop provided by the sling plate can block the motion of the folding stock and prevent stowage. This interference is assured if the sling plate is ambidextrous.
What is needed then is a mounting structure for a sling that will not interfere with a folding stock while being in an advantageous position. This structure needs to provide at least one sling mounting point with a preference for two, each being on either side of the firearm. Combining the sling mount with an existing piece of firearm hardware allows for drop in replacement while providing the intended benefit. One potential component for replacement is the recoil lug. The recoil lug provides a backstop against which the firearm's recoil spring may react in order to re-position the firearm's bolt carrier group for firing. In most firearms without a recoil buffer tube/receiver extension tube, this recoil lug is positioned above the stock in a rearward orientation of the firearm. This, then, provides an ideal location for positioning a sling mount, in particular an external loop.
An integrated recoil lug and sling loop represents a departure from the prior art in that it allows a single part to serve as both a recoil lug and a sling attachment loop simultaneously. The integrated part also allows for the use of a rearward sling mounting point on long firearms with a folding stock.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages inherent in the known types of sling mounts, this invention provides a sling mount that is useful for folding stocks and also serves as a recoil lug for the recoil spring. As such, the present invention's general purpose is to provide a new and improved sling mount that is easily incorporated into an existing system by replacing the system's recoil lug.
To accomplish these objectives, the sling mount comprises a lug body shaped in general conformity to a given weapon platform's recoil lug. At least one sling loop radially projects along a perimeter of the lug body. Accommodating the sling mount may require adaptation of the firearm in that the outer casing of the upper receiver may have to be cut to allow the at least one sling loop passage. Weapon functionality is preserved because the sling mount is shaped, sized and formed in a manner to replace the recoil lug of an existing or later developed weapon system.
The more important features of the invention have thus been outlined in order that the more detailed description that follows may be better understood and in order that the present contribution to the art may better be appreciated. Additional features of the invention will be described hereinafter and will form the subject matter of the claims that follow.
Many objects of this invention will appear from the following description and appended claims, reference being made to the accompanying drawings forming a part of this specification wherein like reference characters designate corresponding parts in the several views.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
With reference now to the drawings, the preferred embodiment of the integrated sling mount and recoil lug is herein described. It should be noted that the articles “a”, “an”, and “the”, as used in this specification, include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
With reference to
In the depicted embodiment, the sling mount 10 features a spring guide rod connection post 16 projecting from a lug core 12 and presenting a hole 18 for the fastening of a recoil spring guide rod thereto. The spring guide rod connection post 16 is then coaxial with the recoil spring and guide rod and together they define an axis, about which the lug core 12 may be said to be eccentrically mounted, with the majority of its mass above the axis. Lug core 12 is ideally made to key into the interior structure of the weapon's upper receiver. This then prevents any rotation or other movement of the lug core 12 inside the firearm. As it is made to key into the receiver, the lug core may be of any shape, as dictated by the receiver. At least one sling loop 14 extends outwardly from the lug core 12, generally perpendicular to the axis, and projects through the casing of the upper receiver 26 of a firearm 20, as shown in
It should be noted that the depicted combination sling mount and recoil lug is fashioned for a Bushmaster ACR rifle. As such its contours, size and construction are dictated by the rifle. It stands to reason that for different rifles, different shapes, sizes, part orientations, locations relative to the firearm and variations will therefore follow and still be considered within the scope of the present invention. No limitation with respect to the specific embodiment disclosed herein is intended or should be inferred.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2040150 | Merrill | May 1936 | A |
2078010 | Meepos | Apr 1937 | A |
2771699 | Herter | Nov 1956 | A |
3061965 | Lewis | Nov 1962 | A |
3226872 | Pachmayr | Jan 1966 | A |
4066000 | Rostocil | Jan 1978 | A |
4553469 | Atchisson | Nov 1985 | A |
4567810 | Preston | Feb 1986 | A |
4654993 | Atchisson | Apr 1987 | A |
4693170 | Atchisson | Sep 1987 | A |
4807512 | Johansson | Feb 1989 | A |
4864761 | Gregory | Sep 1989 | A |
5575411 | Hightower | Nov 1996 | A |
5613316 | Hightower | Mar 1997 | A |
6260748 | Lindsey | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325258 | Verdugo et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6536153 | Lindsey | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6598330 | Garrett et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
D495870 | Verdugo | Sep 2004 | S |
7082709 | Lindsey | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D568957 | Esch | May 2008 | S |
7398616 | Weir | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7562481 | Esch | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7814697 | Esch | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8230633 | Sisk | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8312662 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20020020725 | Verdugo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020153393 | Verdugo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030110675 | Garrett et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050034347 | Verdugo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060254113 | Esch | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090288325 | Esch | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100162609 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287808 | King | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110138671 | Rogers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110239512 | Kleven | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120011758 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61364742 | Jul 2010 | US |