The following detailed description is directed to methods, systems, and apparatuses for using integrated systems for wire and cable installations. This description provides various components, one or more of which may be included in particular implementations of the integrated systems for wire and cable installations. In illustrating and describing these various components, however, it is noted that implementations of the integrated systems for wire and cable installations may include any combination of these components, including combinations other than those shown in this description.
The interactions 108 may represent the contractor 106 providing specifications related to the wire pulls. The interactions 108 may also represent the manufacturer 102 processing these specifications to design and provide an integrated system that is customized for performing one or more of the wire pulls at the contractor site.
In some cases, the integrated systems 110 may pass directly from the manufacturer 102 to the contractor 106.
Turning to
Turning to the server systems 202 in more detail, these systems may include one or more processors 204, which may have a particular type or architecture, chosen as appropriate for particular implementations. The processors 204 may couple to one or more bus systems 206 chosen for compatibility with the processors 204.
The server systems 202 may also include one or more instances of computer-readable storage medium or media 208, which couple to the bus systems 206. The bus systems 206 may enable the processors 204 to read code and/or data to/from the computer-readable storage media 208. The media 208 may represent apparatus in the form of storage elements that are implemented using any suitable technology, including but not limited to semiconductors, magnetic materials, optics, or the like. The media 208 may include memory components, whether classified as RAM, ROM, flash, or other types, and may also represent hard disk drives.
The storage media 208 may include one or more modules of instructions that, when loaded into the processor 204 and executed, cause the server systems 202 to perform various techniques related to provisioning the integrated systems for wire and cable installations. As detailed throughout this description, these modules of instructions may also provide various tools or techniques by which the server systems 202 may provision the integrated systems 110, using the components and flows discussed in more detail throughout this description. For example, the storage media 208 may include one or more software modules that implement configuration and ordering tools or utilities 210. These configuration and ordering tools 210 generally represent software programmed or configured to perform various functions allocated herein to the server systems 202. For example, the contractors 106 and/or distributors may access the configuration and ordering tools 210, once they have logged into the server systems 202.
Turning to the configuration and ordering tools 210 in more detail, these tools may provide suitable graphical user interfaces (UIs) and related process flows by which the manufacturer 102 may obtain different parameters related to one or more wire/cable pulls to be performed on a contractor job site.
Turning to the parameters 212 in more detail, these parameters 212 may include a representation of a job or site identifier where the wire/cable pulls are scheduled to occur.
At a given job or site indicated by the identifier 212A, one or more different wire/cable pulls or runs may be scheduled and provisioned using the configuration and ordering tool 210.
For a given wire/cable run or pull, the configuration and ordering tools 210 may gather different parameters. For example,
In addition, the conduit configuration parameters 212D may indicate a general layout or configuration of a given conduit run. For example, the conduit configuration parameters 212D may indicate whether the conduit run includes any bends. For conduit runs that include bends, the conduit configuration parameters 212D may indicate how many and what types of bends occur, and the like. The conduit configuration parameters 212D may indicate whether the conduit run includes any intermediate pull or junction boxes, and the locations of any such boxes. Finally, the conduit configuration parameters 212D may indicate whether the conduit itself is constructed of metallic or plastic (e.g., polyvinyl chloride (PVC)) materials.
The configuration parameters 212 may include parameters representing particular conductors involved with a given run, denoted generally at 212E. The conductor parameters 212E may indicate how many conductors (whether individual wires or cables that include multiple wires) are included in a given run, how many conductors are included within the armor of an armored cable, as well as the size and type of these conductors. These conductor sizes or types may be expressed and represented using any suitable nomenclature known to those skilled in the art. The configuration parameters 212 may also specify whether a given conductor is copper, aluminum, or other conductive material.
The configuration parameters 212 may include parameters representing colors of insulation desired for particular conductors, as denoted generally at 212F. As understood by those skilled in the art, certain colors chosen for a given circuit may convey corresponding electrical functions. These colors and functions may vary depending on whether the circuit is operating at high-voltage or at low-voltage. For example, in either high-voltage or low-voltage scenarios, green-colored conductors typically function as circuit grounds. In high-voltage scenarios, brown, orange, or yellow conductors may indicate “hot” circuit functions, while gray conductors may indicate circuit neutrals. In low-voltage scenarios, black, red, or blue conductors may indicate “hot” circuit functions, while white conductors may indicate circuit neutrals. In general, these conductor colors may be expressed and represented using any suitable nomenclature and conventions known to those skilled in the art.
In previous techniques, phase tape may be applied to, for example, black conductors to represent different circuit functions. However, applying phase tape to these different conductors may be laborious and error prone. For example, cross-phasing the electrical supply to, for example, three-phase equipment may damage this equipment. However, the color-coded conductors provided as part of the integrated systems 110 may reduce or eliminate the use of phase tape on individual conductors.
The configuration parameters 212 may indicate whether the wires or cables are to be equipped with pulling eyes, as represented generally at 212G. These pulling eyes are described in more detail below. In overview, the manufacturers 102 or distributors 104 may install, at their facilities, pulling eyes onto a leading end of the wires that are delivered to the contractors 106. These pulling eyes facilitate attaching pulling ropes to the ends of the wires, for pulling into and through the conduit. Because the pulling eyes are affixed at the factory before delivery to the contractors 106, personnel associated with the contractors 106 are relieved from the labor and time involved with configuring the ends of the wires for the pulls. For example, using previous techniques, contractor personnel may create a pulling head by stripping some length of the insulation from the end of a wire, thereby exposing the bare metallic conductor or conductors. In cases where the wire is a stranded conductor, at least some of the outer strands may be untwisted and pulled back, and the interior strands cut out. In turn, the outer strands may be attached to or twisted around a pulling rope in some convenient fashion to form a pulling head. The whole connection may be wrapped with adhesive tape (e.g., duct tape or electrical tape) further to secure the connection between the pulling rope and the wire.
In these previous techniques for creating pulling heads, however, the pulling tension is borne by only a subset of the conductor strands, namely the strands that are not cut off when creating the pulling heads. Because only a subset of the conductor strands are bearing the pulling tension, the maximum pulling tension that a given pulling head may withstand before failing may be reduced. However, as described in further detail below, the pulling eyes are attached to all of the stranded conductors, such that the pulling tension is transferred to all of the stranded conductors, rather than only a subset thereof. Accordingly, implementations of the integrated systems 110 that incorporate the pulling eyes may achieve higher maximum pulling tensions. In addition, pulling heads that incorporate the pulling eyes may be shorter in length and more flexible than conventional pulling heads, and thus may travel through bends in conduit runs more readily without snagging or binding.
Typically, pulls through conduits may experience bends having any angle up to or possibly more than approximately 90°. The pulling eyes described herein may be of any length suitable for clearing such bends without binding or jamming during pulls.
Using the pulling eyes affixed to the ends of the wires, the pulling rope may be attached to the wires, while reducing the labor time and cost associated with previous techniques for forming the pulling head. In general, configuration parameters 212G associated with a given wire or conductor may indicate whether that given wire or conductor is to be equipped with a pulling eye. For example, for an armored cable run, all of the conductors making up the armored cable may be equipped with a pulling eye, or a portion of the conductors making up the armored cable may be equipped with a pulling eye while the remaining conductors are not equipped with a pulling eye. In cases where multiple types of pulling eyes are available, the configuration parameters 212G may identify which type of pulling eye is to be attached to the given wire or conductor.
The parameters 212 may also include an armor size/configuration parameter 212H for runs involving armored cable, such as MC cable. The armor size/configuration parameter 212H may indicate the size of the armor to be associated with the armored cable as well as the type of material the armor itself is to be constructed of, such as metal. As is known by one skilled in the art, the size of the armor to be associated with the armored cable may be determined based on the number and size of conductors to be included within the armor as provided by the conductor parameters 212E. The armor size may be expressed and represented using any suitable nomenclature known to those skilled in the art. In addition, the armor size/configuration parameter 212H may indicate a general layout or configuration of a given armored cable run.
The configuration and ordering tool 210 may also recommend appropriate pulling equipment for a given run, based at least in part on the pull tension 304 calculated for the given run. Examples of pulling equipment may include tuggers, which typically have maximum rated pulling capacities. In an example scenario, if the pull tension 304 is calculated as a maximum of 2,000 pounds, the configuration and ordering tool 210 may recommend equipment capable of generating at most 2,000 pounds of force. In this example, providing equipment capable of generating any force more than 2,000 pounds would be an unnecessary expense.
The integrated system 110 may include any number of insulated conductors, represented generally at 402. These conductors may be configured in any number of different ways, to reduce the force involved with installing the insulated conductors through conduit. For example, the insulation of the conductors may be pre-lubed during manufacture, as distinguished from having lubricant applied to the conductors when preparing the pull at the jobsite. The various issued patents, provisional applications, and non-provisional patent applications incorporated herein by reference above provide various non-limiting examples of the pre-lubed insulated conductors 402. However, it is noted that implementations of this description may include other examples of the pre-lubed insulated conductors 402 without departing from the scope and spirit of this description.
The integrated system 110 may include any number of color-coded conductors, represented generally at 404. For example, recalling previous description of
In further embodiments, the integrated system 110 may include armored cable, represented generally at 405. As discussed above, the armored cable may include a number of conductors covered by an armor, such as metal.
The conductors 402 provided by a given implementation of the integrated system 110, whether these conductors are pre-lubed and/or color-coded, may be delivered so that multiple different conductors are provided for payoff on a single given reel, denoted generally at 406. For example, if a given order specifies three different conductors having three different insulation colors, the integrated system 110 fulfilling this order may provision these three different conductors on the same reel. Accordingly, the integrated system 110 may enable all three conductors to be payed-off or dispensed from the same reel in parallel with one another.
In addition, the conductors as loaded onto the same reel may be cut to length, recalling, for example, that a pull length may be specified for a given run of conduit (e.g., at 212C in
In some implementation scenarios, the reels may be compartmentalized, to contain the different colors of conductors in respective compartments. In other implementation scenarios, the reels may include a single compartment that contains all the different colors of conductors.
In contrast, previous techniques may fulfill this given order by delivering three different reels, each of which would contain one of the different conductors. In these previous techniques, the three different conductors would be payed-off simultaneously from three different reels, further complicating installation of the conductors. Subsequent drawings illustrate and provide further details related to these single-reel scenarios.
The integrated systems 110 as delivered to a given contractor 106 may be delivered with a consolidated payoff system, as denoted generally at 408. Typically, using previous techniques, reels containing conductors would be installed on apparatus configured on an ad hoc basis at the jobsite. However, these delivered reels may be quite heavy and difficult to manhandle into position, with the attendant risk of strain and injury to workers. However, the consolidated payoff system 408, as illustrated in further detail below, may expedite and facilitate setup of the delivered reels, and may reduce or eliminate manual positioning and leveling of these delivered reels. For example, forklifts or other machinery may maneuver the consolidated payoff system 408 as a single unit into position. Once the payoff system 408 is in place, workers may adjust the system as appropriate to pay-off the conductors into the conduit.
The integrated systems 110 may also include delivered wires, conductors, or armored cable that have pulling eyes installed onto their ends.
The integrated systems 110 may also deliver specialized pulling ropes, denoted generally at 412. For example, these pulling ropes may be coated or impregnated with specialized low-friction compounds, similar to the compounds that impregnate the pre-lubed insulated conductors 402. In previous techniques for pulling conductors through conduit, contact between the rope and the conduit may contribute considerable friction to the overall pull, thereby increasing the pulling tension. However, by reducing the friction between the pulling rope and the surrounding conduit, the integrated systems 110 may reduce the overall tension involved in a given pull. In addition, abrasive or high-friction rope may damage conduit constructed of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), resulting in burrs, notches, or debris left in the conduit. In turn, this damage to the structure of the conduit may damage conductors and insulation when the wires are pulled into the conduit. However, the specialized pulling rope 412 may be constructed of nylon, and impregnated with low-friction compound.
A variable-speed tugger 414 may also be provided as part of the integrated systems 110. The variable speed tugger 414 may include a drum to which the pulling rope 412 is attached. In some implementations, this variable-speed tugger 414 may be an electric motor controllable by a two-speed switch or a variable-speed switch. This electric motor may be fitted with an output shaft connected to a 90° output chuck, with this output chuck coupled to drive the drum of the tugger 414.
The integrated systems 110 may also include one or more protective covering 416 made of a low-friction material (e.g., NYLON, PVC, or any polymeric materials), with these coverings 416 being adapted for placement around a pulling head before commencing a given pull. More specifically, these coverings 416 may conceal any hardware included as part of the pulling head that might contribute to increased friction, thereby reducing the risk that this hardware may contact the conduit through which the conductors are pulled. As described previously regarding the insulated conductors 402, the protective coverings 416 may contribute, along with other factors, to reducing the force involved with drawing the pulling head though conduit during a given pull. For example, the protective coverings 416 may be pre-lubed during manufacture and/or have lubricant applied to the coverings when preparing the pull at the jobsite.
In example implementation scenarios, the conductors 402 may be of any convenient size or type. In different possible implementations, the different conductors 402A-402N may or may not be of the same size or type. For example, conductors 402 that serve as circuit neutrals may be downsized, relative to conductors 402 that serve as higher-voltage supplies.
The conductors 402 may include insulation 502A-502N (collectively, insulation 502) of any suitable thickness, composition, or type. In addition, the insulation 502 may be color-coded as discussed above in connection with the color-coded conductors 404 in
As also described above, the insulation 502 may be impregnated or coated with a suitable lubricant as part of the process of manufacturing the insulation 502, as distinguished from previous techniques in which lubricant is applied to the exterior of the insulation 502 just prior to the conductors 402 being pulled through the conduit.
As shown in
Turning to the payoff systems 408 in more detail, these systems 408 may include a base platform 602 of sufficient size and weight to provide stability for the overall systems 408 during shipment, delivery, and installation at a construction job site. The base platform 602 is generally horizontal in configuration and may include two or more slots 610 or channels in the base spaced such that the payoff system 408 may be lifted and carried as a single unit by a standard forklift. The payoff systems 408 may also include vertical supports 604A and 604B (collectively, vertical supports 604). The vertical supports 604 may rotatably support the ends of the reel 406, allowing the reel 406 to spin while paying-off the conductors 402. The reel 406 may also include flanges 606A and 606B (collectively, flanges 606) to direct the conductors 402 away from the vertical supports 604.
The payoff systems 408 may also include leveling mechanisms 608A and 608B (collectively, leveling mechanisms 608), respectively attached to the vertical supports 604A and 604B. More specifically, the leveling mechanism 608A is disposed between the platform 602 and the vertical support 604A, while the leveling mechanism 608B is disposed between the platform 602 and the vertical supports 604B. In general, the leveling mechanisms 608 may operate to level the reel 406. For example, assuming that the platform 602 is set upon uneven ground, the leveling mechanisms 608 may adjust the orientation of the vertical supports 604 relative to the platform 602, to level the reel 406. The leveling mechanisms 608 may operate by any suitable means, including but not limited to, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, or other similar means.
The pulling eye 700 may generally include a somewhat elongated body portion 702, which defines an interior cavity 704 along at least part of the body portion 702. In turn, the bare cable or wire 504 may be inserted into the cavity 704, and the body portion 702 may be crimped, swaged, or otherwise secured to the wire. In scenarios in which the body portion 702 is crimped onto the wire 504, the dimensions of the body portion 702 (more specifically, the wall thickness) may be chosen as appropriate to provide a solid crimp. More specifically, the crimp strength may be sufficient to withstand the tension that the conductor 402 is expected to encounter while being pulled into the conduit.
In other implementation scenarios, the pulling eyes 700 may include a wedging mechanism, set screws, or other mechanical mechanisms operative to secure the body portion 702 to the exposed cable or wire 504.
In implementations in which the pulling eyes 700 are crimped onto the ends of the conductors 402, the pulling eyes 700 may be manufactured of material suitable for crimping (e.g., aluminum, or alloys thereof). In general, the pulling eyes 700 may be manufactured using any suitable processes, including but not limited to, machining from a single piece of stock aluminum or other material, as well as forging, casting, molding, or the like. In addition, the pulling eye 700 may define an aperture 706 through which a pulling rope may be secured, as described further below with
As compared to previous approaches, in which pulling heads are created for a given conduit run or armored cable run on an ad hoc basis at the jobsite, the pulling eyes 700 as installed by the manufacturers may provide a more standardized and reliable connection to the conductors. Moreover, engineering techniques and quality control processes in place at the manufacturer's facilities may overcome the variability and deviations typically experienced with ad hoc installations done at the jobsite by differently-skilled personnel. In some cases, the manufacturers may publish specifications indicating maximum tension ratings applicable to particular installations of the pulling eyes 700 to the conductors 402.
In some scenarios, the pulling eyes 700 may double as hardware that is suitable for electrically coupling the conductors 402 to terminating switchgear or equipment. For example, an end 708 of the pulling eyes 700 that is opposite the end where the conductor 402 enters may be flattened or otherwise adapted to be bolted into a lug or other attachment mechanism provided by the terminating switchgear or equipment. In this manner, the pulling eyes 700 so configured may save labor time in preparing the conductors 402 for connection to the terminating switchgear or equipment.
In the examples shown in
Turning to the pulling ropes 802 in more detail, as described above, these pulling ropes 802 may be coated or impregnated with low-friction compound to reduce friction and pulling force within the conduit during a pull. This low-friction compound may or may not be similar to the lubricant used to pre-lubricate the insulated conductors, as described above in
In some implementations, the protective cover 904 may include shrinkable tubing applied over the pulling head 902, which may be constructed using any of the techniques provided herein. The shrinkable tubing may provide a low-friction jacket or covering over at least a portion of the pulling head 902. In some cases, the shrinkable tubing may shrink when heated with an external source, referred to as “heat” shrinking. In other cases, the shrinkable tubing without heating, and thus characterized as “cold” shrinkable tubing. This “cold” shrinkable tubing may allow installation personnel to apply the shrinkable tubing to the pulling head 902 without using torches or heating sources, which may simplify pulls in the field. Examples of shrinkable tubing, whether characterized as “cold” or otherwise, are available commercially from a variety of vendors.
Turning to the pulling head assemblies 1000 in more detail, respective pulling eyes 1002A-1002N (collectively, pulling eyes 1002) are shown affixed to corresponding insulated conductors 402A-402N. It is noted that the pulling eyes 1002 as shown in
The individual pulling cables 1004 may include loops, referenced collectively at 1006, which may be formed by suitable crimps, swages, or other attachment means (denoted collectively at 1008). In turn, any number of the pulling cables 1004 may be connected to a clevis 1010. The clevis 1010 may facilitate attachment of the pulling cables 1004 to the pulling rope 412. The pulling rope 412 may include a loop 1012 facilitating attachment to the clevis 1010. The clevis 1010 may be constructed of any suitable metallic or nonmetallic materials, chosen as appropriate for the loads anticipated to be borne by the clevis 1010 during pulls of the completed head assembly through conduit. In addition, implementations of the clevis 1010 may be dimensioned and shaped differently from the examples shown in
In different possible implementations, a given pulling cable 1004 may be attached to one or two of the pulling eyes 1002. For example, the pulling cables 1004C and 1004N may be the same pulling cable, with one end attached to the pulling eye 1002C and the other end attached to the pulling eye 1002N.
In the examples shown in
Although not shown in
In the examples shown in
In some implementations, the reels 406 may be loaded with the multiple conductors at a facility, where the conductors themselves are manufactured. In other implementations, a warehouse or distribution facility may load the multiple conductors onto the single reels. In general, multiple differently-colored conductors may be loaded in combination onto single reels before delivering the single reels to jobsites, thereby relieving jobsite personnel from pulling from multiple reels simultaneously.
As also shown in
The sleeves provided by the pulling eyes 1204 may be compressed using suitable dies. In some implementations, multiple crimps may be formed simultaneously with multiple dies. In other implementations, multiple crimps may be formed in sequence with a single die. The foregoing examples may apply, whether the multiple crimps share a similar rotational alignment, or whether the multiple crimps are rotated relative to one another. As further shown in
In the example shown in
The upper portion of
Once the pulling eye 1204A is fastened onto the end of the smaller ground conductor 402A, the spring 1402 may serve as a dampening member between the pulling cable 1202A and the smaller ground conductor 402A. When the smaller ground conductor 402A is pulled through a conduit, along with the other larger conductors 402B-402D, the spring 1402 may dampen any excessive tension experienced by the smaller ground conductor 402A during the pull, thereby protecting the smaller ground conductor 402A from damage resulting from such excessive tension.
Referring to the lower portion of
In other approaches, the ends of the conductors 402A-402D may be aligned relative to one another to reduce the risk that the smaller ground conductor 402A may experience damage from excessive tension during pulls. As shown in
Turning to the variable speed tugger 1502 in more detail, the variable speed tugger 1502 may include circuitry or software adapted to sense resistance to an ongoing pull, represented generally by a vector 1504. This resistance may be attributable to friction and other forces within the conduit between the conductors being pulled, the pulling heads, and/or the involved pulling ropes. Other factors that may contribute to this resistance include elastic bending governed by bending stiffness proportional to Young's modulus, inelastic bending governed by yield stress, surface deformation governed by hardness and scratch resistance. The Young's modulus, yield stress, hardness, and scratch resistance are physical properties that can each be affected by the cable's sheath composition, including the amount of lubricant. The pulling force during installation may also include a time varying, oscillating component. This oscillating component occurs when there is slack in portions of the cable and is affected by, for example, the difference between the static coefficient of friction and the kinetic coefficient of friction. The oscillating component can also arise when cables jam while being pulled through angles, as is typical during installation. Cable jamming arises specifically when the cable cross-section changes shape during bending. In fact, for installations with severe angles, the coefficient of friction may not contribute appreciably to the pulling force.
In some cases, resistance may increase when the pulling heads reach a bend or sweep within the conduit, and then decrease after the pulling heads pass through this bend or sweep. In addition, this resistance may be attributable to obstructions or damage occurring within the conduit (e.g., burrs, foreign matter, physical damage, or the like). As this resistance increases, the tension on the pulling ropes also typically increases. In this scenario, the variable speed tugger 1502 may reduce the speed of the pull, thereby reducing the tension on the pulling ropes. In this manner, the variable speed tugger 1502 may reduce the risk of exposing the pulling ropes to excessive tension, and/or damaging the pulling heads.
As a given pull proceeds, resistance to the pull may decrease or remain at a relatively low level.
In previous techniques for pulling wires into conduit, lubricant is typically applied to the wires while they are pulled into and through the conduit. Hence, in these previous techniques, the speed with which the pull can be conducted may be limited by how quickly the lubricant can be applied to the wires. Stated in different terms, lacing the lubricant on the wires during the pull may be a performance bottleneck. However, the various reduced installation force techniques and components provided as part of the integrated systems 110 may contribute to eliminating the performance bottleneck, allowing the overall pull to be conducted more quickly. Accordingly, the variable speed tugger 1502 may take advantage of the performance potential offered by the integrated systems 110 by increasing the pull speed as appropriate in certain circumstances.
The tugger 1502 may include appropriate mechanical components, such as an electric drive motor (not shown), which may drive a rotating circular drum 1508. Only for example,
Considered as a whole, the tugger 1502 may have weight sufficient to resist pulling forces likely to be encountered when pulling the head 902 through a given run of conduit. Accordingly, the tugger 1502 may provide a mass that is relatively immovable, as compared to the forces encountered in a given pull. It is further noted that various tuggers 1502 having different pulling capacities may be appropriate in different pulls, depending upon the pulling forces expected to be encountered during those pulls.
As shown generally at 1602C, the pulling eyes may be assembled onto a given pulling cable or rope, as carried forward from
Once one or more given conductors are pulled through a conduit, the assembled pulling eye 1616 may be disassembled as follows. First, if the assembled pulling eye 1616 includes fasteners (e.g., 1612A-1612M, collectively fasteners 1612), these fasteners 1612 may be loosened, allowing the head portions 1606 to unthread relative to the sleeve or barrel portions 1604. Otherwise, the head portions 1606 may be unscrewed directly from the sleeve or barrel portions 1604. Once the head portions 1606 and the sleeve or barrel portions 1604 are completely disengaged from one another, the pulling cables 1202B and head portions 1606 may be separated from the conductor as pulled through the conduit, and reused in future conduit runs.
Referring to the head portions 1606, these head portions may be connected to any number of different sleeve or barrel portions 1604. More specifically, different sleeve or barrel portions 1604 may be sized as appropriate to receive conductors of different sizes or gauges. Thus, the different sleeve or barrel portions 1604 may have different physical dimensions (e.g., inside diameters, outside diameters, lengths, thickness, compositions, etc.). However, these different sleeve or barrel portions 1604 may neck down or up as appropriate to couple to common-sized head portions 1606. Thus, the head portions 1606 may be used to pull a variety of differently sized conductors through conduit, by connecting to differently sized sleeve or barrel portions 1604.
In light of the foregoing description, the physical connection interface between the head portions 1606 and the differently sized sleeve or barrel portions 1604 may be standardized. For example, the sleeve or barrel portions 1604 and the head portions 1606 may be joined by mating threaded members. However, the examples shown in
Having described the examples of the head portions 1606 and sleeves 1604 in
As indicated at 1706, the head portion 1701 may slide into a representative sleeve or barrel portion 1604, carried forward from
In the examples shown in
The physical dimensions of the pin 1704 may vary in different implementations. For example, the non-threaded pulling eyes 1700 may rely on a friction fit between the pin 1704 and the sleeve 1604 and/or the head portion 1701 to secure the pin 1704 in place. In other cases, the pin 1704 may be secured in engagement with the sleeve or barrel portion 1604 and/or the head portion 1701 by separate fastening means (e.g., nuts, cotter pins, etc.).
As described above, the sleeve or barrel portion 1604 may be crimped onto the end of a given conductor for pulling through conduit. In some cases, a given assembled non-threaded pulling eye 1700 may be assembled into pulling heads that include one or more other assembled pulling eyes. These other pulling eyes in the pulling head may or may not be of the same type as the pulling eyes 1700.
Once the head portion 1701 is secured to the barrel portion 1604, the pull may proceed. After the pull is complete, the non-threaded pulling eyes 1700 may be disassembled by reversing the assembly process described above. Afterwards, the crimped sleeve or barrel portion 1604 may be discarded or recycled. However, the head portion 1701 may be used repeatedly for other pulls, after assembly with another sleeve or barrel portion 1604.
As appreciated from reading the foregoing description with reference to
Crimping the body or sleeve portion 1904 may displace a certain portion of the material constituting the body or sleeve portion 1904. In implementations that perform the crimped sequence in the order indicated by the sequential markings 1902A-1902C, the material displaced by the crimping operations may generally flow in the direction indicated by the arrow 1906. In this manner, the displaced material may flow toward a distal end of a conductor onto which the pulling eye 1908 is crimped.
In light of the foregoing description, a first crimp performed approximately where indicated by the marking 1902A may result in some displaced material flowing in both directions (i.e., some toward the head portion 1910, and some displaced material flowing in the direction indicated by the arrow 1906). A second crimp performed approximately where indicated by the marking 1902B may also result in some displaced material flowing in both directions. However, displaced material flowing opposite the direction 1906 would be blocked by the first crimp 1902A. Similar considerations apply to material displaced by the third crimp performed approximately where indicated by the marking 1902C. Accordingly, performing the crimps in the order indicated by the markings 1902A-1902C may allow material displaced by the crimps to flow unimpeded along the body portion 1904 in the direction indicated by the arrow 1906.
In the examples shown in
In other examples, the body portions may be color-coded. For example, a first sequential crimping location may be color-coded red, a second sequential crimping location may be color-coded white, a third sequential crimping location may be color-coded blue, and so on. These color-coding crimping locations may be associated with a suitable mnemonic (e.g., “red-white-and-blue”).
For convenience of description only, and not to limit possible implementations, the foregoing drawings and description may relate to examples including body portions that are crimped three times. However, implementations of this description may incorporate any suitable number of crimps, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present description.
As described above with previous drawings, successive or adjacent crimps performed along the body portion 1904 may be rotated relative to one another, as illustrated in, for example,
In light of the foregoing description, the pulling eye 1908 may be crimped by following the marking line 1912 along the body portion 1904, and placing the crimping tool approximately at the intersections 1914A-1914C (collectively, intersections 1914) when performing sequential crimps. Following the intersections 1914 as indicated in
Referring to the head portions 1910, these head portions may bear textual or other subject matter. This subject matter may be printed, etched, embossed, debossed, textured, or otherwise visibly affixed to the head portions 1910. Examples of the subject matter may include, but are not limited to: sizes of the conductors onto which a given pulling eye 1908 is crimped or sized to be crimped; trademarks, logos, or other branding information associated with the pulling eyes 1908, or associated with integrated wire installation systems of which the pulling eyes 1908 are a part; or the like.
Pulling eye 1908B is shown unattached to a conductor, and may include other examples of labels 2006, featuring logos or the like. In some implementations, a given pulling eye 1908 may include the label 2004 or the label 2006. In other implementations, the given pulling eye 1908 may include the label 2004 and the label 2006, with the labels 2004 and 2006 appearing on different sides of the pulling eye 1908. In addition, the labels 2004 and/or 2006 may appear in locations other than those shown in
The internal bore 2106 may be formed from a cylindrical blank of material by, for example, machining through the blank at a distance L with a drill bit having a diameter D1. Examples of suitable materials may include, but are not limited to aluminum, aluminum alloy (e.g., O-tempered 6061 alloy), or other materials suitable for crimping onto and engaging conductors. In general, the pulling eyes described herein may be manufactured from any metals having a relatively tacky or high-friction characteristic when cold, particularly when crimped into close contact with metals commonly used to manufacture electrical conductors (e.g., aluminum, copper, and the like).
As shown at 2112, the pulling eye 1908A may be crimped onto the conductor 402, with the crimping technique shown in
The ball portion 2122 may be manufactured to a predefined dimension, depending on the size of the pulling eyes 1908 and/or the gauge of the conductor 402 with which the pulling eyes 1908 are to be used. Once the ball portion 2122 is fully seated in the lip area 2108, it may provide a stop that an end of the conductor 402 may contact. Put differently, the conductor 402 may be inserted into the pulling eye 1908 until the end of the conductor 402 rests against the ball portion 2122. At this point, the conductor 402 is fully bottomed in the pulling eye 1908, and the pulling eye 1908 may be crimped onto the conductor 402.
Some implementations of this description may employ insulation-stripping tools that remove a predefined length of insulation from the conductor 402, exposing that length of bare metal. If some portion of the bare metal remains exposed after the conductor 402 is inserted into the pulling eye 1908, this may indicate that the conductor 402 is not fully bottomed in the pulling eye 1908 and may be inserted further to obtain a more secure crimp.
In the example shown in
In the crimping examples shown and described herein, the pulling eyes may be crimped onto the outer surfaces of the conductors. Implementations of the crimping techniques described herein may utilize all strands of the conductors, without removing or cutting any of these strands. As appreciated from this description, removing some of the strands may reduce the pulling strength of the crimp between the conductor and the pulling eye. In addition, the crimping techniques described herein may operate without any additional plugs, wedges, or other devices forced into the strands of the conductor as part of the crimping process. Accordingly, crimping forces may act only on the outer portion of the conductor, without utilizing such plugs, wedges, or the like to generate counteracting forces internally from within the strands of the conductor.
As described previously, different pulling eyes 2202 may be provided for crimping onto conductors having different sizes or gauges. Thus, the pulling eyes 2202 may be available in different sizes, according to the gauge of conductor being installed. In general, the length of the sleeve portions 2204 may be approximately the same, regardless of the size or gauge of the conductor being installed. However, the diameter of the sleeve portion 2204 may vary to accommodate different sizes or gauges of conductors.
Likewise, the diameter of the head portion 2206 may also vary to accommodate these different sizes or gauges of conductors. However, the overall length of the head portion 2206 may vary, depending upon the radius of the rounded portion as shown in
As represented at 2208,
Referring first to the view 2208, this size of the pulling eye 2202 may be characterized by a first outside diameter (OD1), and a first inside diameter (ID1). The difference between the OD1 and the ID1 represents a wall thickness associated with this size of the pulling eye 2202.
Referring now to the view 2210, this size of the pulling eye 2202 may be characterized by a second outside diameter (OD2), and a second inside diameter (ID2). The difference between the OD2 and the ID2 represents a wall thickness associated with this size of the pulling eye 2202.
Although
Regarding the wall thicknesses, as defined by the inside diameters ID1 and ID2 and the outside diameters OD1 and OD2, different wall thicknesses are possible in different implementations. In example implementations, however, these wall thicknesses may be less than or equal to approximately ⅛″. Once again, however, experimentation with different wall thicknesses and materials may yield similar or different results.
As described above, implementations of this description may employ various techniques for indicating a sequence and/or rotational orientation of successive or sequential crimps along pulling eyes. Referring to
In example implementations, the color-coded area 2306A may be printed or otherwise colored as red. The color-coded area 2306B may be colored as white, and the color-coded area 2306C be colored as blue. Accordingly, the pulling eyes 2302 and 2304 may employ the color-coded areas 2306A-2306C connection with a mnemonic or memory device, such as “red, white, and blue.” For example, the color-coded areas 2306A-2306C may suggest to operations personnel to crimp the red area first, the white area second, and the blue area third.
As also indicated at 2302 and 2304, some implementations of the pulling eyes may indicate rotational orientations of successive crimps. In the examples shown, the red area may be crimped at a given rotational orientation, followed by crimping the white area offset by approximately 90°, followed by crimping the blue area after offsetting by approximately 90° from the previous crimp.
As shown at 2302, the pulling eyes may be printed or otherwise marked with logos, trademarks, or other visual subject matter. As shown at 2304, the pulling eyes may be marked to indicate a wire gauge for which a given pulling eye is sized.
Similar to the above description regarding rotational orientation of successive crimps, the pulling eyes 2402 shown in
Although the description above is primarily focused on wire or cables pulled through conduit, the description may also be applied to armored cable, such as MC cable, or any other cable not necessarily required to be pulled through conduit.
In order to construct the pulling head assemblies of the armored cable 2500 illustrated in
The insulated conductors 2504A-2504C may be cut to lengths associated with the staggered lengths of the pulling cables 2508A-2508C, as further discussed above with regards at least to
The pulling head assemblies of the armored cable 2500 as illustrated in
As shown
As illustrated in
In further embodiments, a protective material, such as shrink wrap, may be applied over the binding material 2512 to protect further from slippage between the armor 2502 and the insulated conductors 2504A-2504C during installation of the armored cable. The protective material may also further protect the screw 2510 from dislodging or being dislodged from the armored cable 2500 during installation of the armored cable. Additionally, the protective material may protect the pulling head assemblies of the armored cable 2500 from catching on any obstructions during installation. According to embodiments, the protective material may be applied completely or partially over the binding material 2512.
As described above in regard to
From operation 2702, the routine 2700 proceeds to operation 2704, where the first parallel wound onto the reel 406 is shrink-wrapped. This may be accomplished by winding one or more layers of shrink-wrap material 2804 over the first parallel on the reel 406, as further shown in
Next, the routine 2700 proceeds from operation 2706 to operation 2708, where the terminal ends of the conductors 402A-402C of the second parallel are positioned such that the end one conductor 402A is offset from the ends of the remaining conductors 402B-402C, as shown in
The routine 2700 then proceeds from operation 2710 to operation 2712, where the end of the longer conductor 402A is pulled through the hole 2902 drilled through the flange 606A of the reel 406 in operation 2706 above, as shown in
As shown in the table presented below, implementations of this description may realize savings in time expended by electrical contractor (EC) personnel. In presenting the table below, it is noted that the wire pull scenarios represented in this table are illustrative only, and that implementations of this description may perform other wire pull scenarios without departing from the scope and spirit of this description. In addition, the hourly labor costs and time estimates provided in this table are illustrative only, and may vary in different implementations of this description. For example, the table below presents illustrative factors relating to an overhead 250′ pull, with four conductors of size 500 with a 1/0 ground conductor. However, the description herein may be applied to other pulls as well. Accordingly, the savings presented in the table below may also vary across different implementations of this description.
In the table below, the left-most two columns present illustrative data related to traditional pipe and wire installations, while the next two columns present illustrative data related to pipe and wire installations performed according to the description herein. The right-most column lists illustrative installation steps as a percentage of total pull time, as compared to the EC personnel using traditional techniques.
Having provided the foregoing description of the drawing figures, several observations are noted. In general, the foregoing drawings are not drawn to scale, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Accordingly, the dimensions or proportions of particular elements, or the relationships between those different elements, as shown in the drawings are chosen only for convenience of description, but do not limit possible implementations of this description.
Various aspects of the integrated systems described herein may be implemented in connection with wires, cables, or conductors of any convenient size. For example, different pulling eyes, as described and illustrated above, may be provided for use with particular sizes of wire or cable. More specifically, the different pulling eyes may be sized and dimensioned as appropriate for the different sizes of wire, or types of conductors (e.g., copper or aluminum).
In general, implementations of the integrated systems 110 described herein may reduce the risk of damaging wire or cable during installation (e.g., pulls through conduits or installation of armored cable). In turn, the risk of equipment damage that is attributable to such wire damage may be reduced. In addition, these integrated systems 110 may reduce the risk of injury to personnel involved with the installation, as well as reducing time and cost associated with the insulation.
Personnel working at service centers may construct the integrated wiring solutions described herein. Among other operations, these construction processes may include at least crimping the pulling eyes onto conductors and assembling the pulling eyes into pulling heads. These construction operations may be performed before delivering the assembled and integrated wiring solutions to a job site. Put differently, the integrated wiring solutions may be pre-assembled for delivery to a job site.
In light of the above description, the service center personnel constructing the integrated wiring solutions may be specially-trained to assemble and construct the integrated wiring solutions. In addition, these service center personnel may be equipped with specially-designed tools to facilitate efficient construction of the integrated wiring solutions. For example, the service center personnel may be equipped with stripping equipment to remove a prescribed, uniform amount of insulation from the conductors, and may further be equipped with standardized tools for crimping the pulling eyes onto the conductors.
On-site contractor personnel may be tasked with a variety of different construction-related functions. Previous techniques for facilitating pulls through conduit may involve such personnel preparing the pulling heads on more or less an as-needed basis. Accordingly, such personnel may possess varying amounts of experience in preparing such pulling heads. However, the service center personnel described above may specialize in various tasks involved with constructing the integrated wiring solutions. Therefore, the integrated wiring solutions constructed by such service center personnel may perform more consistently than pulling heads constructed on-site by, for example, contractor personnel.
The subject matter described above is provided by way of illustration only and should not be construed as limiting. Various modifications and changes may be made to the subject matter described herein without following the example embodiments and applications illustrated and described, and without departing from the true spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/726,992 filed on Mar. 18, 2010, entitled “Integrated Systems for Wire and Cable Installations,” now U.S. Pat. No. 8,800,967, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/162,589 filed on Mar. 23, 2009, entitled “Integrated Systems for Wire and Cable Installations;” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/174,210 filed on Apr. 30, 2009, entitled “Integrated Systems for Wire and Cable Installations;” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/221,216 filed on Jun. 29, 2009, entitled “Integrated Systems for Wire and Cable Installations;” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/244,919 filed on Sep. 23, 2009, entitled “Layered Reel and Layering Multiple Parallels on a Single Reel,” each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application further incorporates by this reference the entire contents of issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,557,301, filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/017,222 on Jan. 21, 2008, and entitled “Method of Manufacturing Electrical Cable Having Reduced Required Force for Installation,” as if the contents thereof were set forth verbatim herein. In addition, this patent application incorporates by this reference the following as if the contents thereof were set forth verbatim herein: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/587,584; and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/858,766 filed on Sep. 20, 2007, now abandoned, and 11/675,441 filed on Feb. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,024.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
524035 | White | Aug 1894 | A |
633067 | Brien | Sep 1899 | A |
1830411 | Schork, Jr. | Nov 1931 | A |
2007411 | Karel | Jul 1935 | A |
2007441 | Candy, Jr. | Jul 1935 | A |
2231919 | Kent | Feb 1941 | A |
2276437 | Vaala | Mar 1942 | A |
2339671 | Bergman | Jan 1944 | A |
2498834 | Bennet et al. | Feb 1950 | A |
2615074 | Bronovichi | Oct 1952 | A |
2685707 | Llewellyn et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
2705735 | Wolf | Apr 1955 | A |
2804973 | Buddecke | Sep 1957 | A |
D181440 | Petersen | Nov 1957 | S |
2901725 | Schuyler | Aug 1959 | A |
2930838 | Chizallet et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3015385 | Chesnut | Jan 1962 | A |
3061088 | Buddecke | Oct 1962 | A |
3064073 | Downing et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3089588 | Correll | May 1963 | A |
3108981 | Clark et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3116810 | Ensley | Jan 1964 | A |
3150844 | Le Bus, Sr. | Sep 1964 | A |
3166810 | Ensley | Jan 1965 | A |
3191005 | Cox, II | Jun 1965 | A |
3258031 | French | Jun 1966 | A |
3330533 | Blume | Jul 1967 | A |
3378628 | Garner | Apr 1968 | A |
3433884 | Cogelia et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3474559 | Hunt | Oct 1969 | A |
3508644 | Martin | Apr 1970 | A |
3573346 | Appleby | Apr 1971 | A |
3668175 | Sattler | Jun 1972 | A |
3727967 | Anastasiu et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3741489 | Kawamura et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3769685 | Noda | Nov 1973 | A |
3779471 | Grein et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3822875 | Middleton | Jul 1974 | A |
3849221 | Middleton | Nov 1974 | A |
3852875 | McAmis et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3868436 | Ootsuji et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3877142 | Hamano et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3885286 | Hill | May 1975 | A |
3936572 | MacKenzie, Jr. et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3989400 | Smith et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4002797 | Hacker et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4002817 | DeGrado | Jan 1977 | A |
4057956 | Tolle | Nov 1977 | A |
4099425 | Moore | Jul 1978 | A |
4100245 | Horikawa et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4101114 | Martin et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4137623 | Taylor | Feb 1979 | A |
4183692 | Durr | Jan 1980 | A |
4194082 | Campbell | Mar 1980 | A |
4199653 | Talley | Apr 1980 | A |
4273806 | Stechler | Jun 1981 | A |
4274509 | Thomson et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4275096 | Taylor | Jun 1981 | A |
4278238 | Vugrek | Jul 1981 | A |
4299256 | Bacehowski et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4336415 | Walling | Jun 1982 | A |
4337923 | Smith | Jul 1982 | A |
4356139 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4360492 | Rowland et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4379615 | Toda | Apr 1983 | A |
4411409 | Smith | Oct 1983 | A |
4416380 | Flum | Nov 1983 | A |
4419534 | Dwyer | Dec 1983 | A |
4432663 | Lasak et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4454949 | Flum | Jun 1984 | A |
4460159 | Charlebois et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4522733 | Jonnes | Jun 1985 | A |
4565351 | Conti et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4568420 | Nonni | Feb 1986 | A |
4569420 | Pickett et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4596486 | Niederer, Sr. | Jun 1986 | A |
4605818 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609180 | Fisher et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4627187 | Williams | Dec 1986 | A |
4629285 | Carter et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635989 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4655432 | Woodruff | Apr 1987 | A |
4673516 | Berry | Jun 1987 | A |
4684161 | Egner et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4684214 | Goldmann et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4691988 | Tremblay et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4693936 | McGregor et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697757 | Nakaya et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4749059 | Jonnes et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4751261 | Miyata et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4806425 | Chu-Ba | Feb 1989 | A |
4937142 | Ogushi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4952021 | Aoki et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4965249 | De With et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5013125 | Nilsson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5036121 | Coaker et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039169 | Bougher et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5039196 | Nilsson | Aug 1991 | A |
5055522 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067843 | Nova | Nov 1991 | A |
5074640 | Hardin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5122007 | Smith | Jun 1992 | A |
5129027 | Boero | Jul 1992 | A |
5197715 | Griffioen | Mar 1993 | A |
5217207 | Schmader et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225635 | Wake et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227080 | Berry | Jul 1993 | A |
5252676 | Suyama et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
D346734 | Rohr | May 1994 | S |
5326638 | Mottine, Jr. et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5356710 | Rinehart | Oct 1994 | A |
5379174 | Kasamoto | Jan 1995 | A |
5383799 | Fladung | Jan 1995 | A |
5460885 | Chu-Ba | Oct 1995 | A |
5480203 | Favalora et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5505900 | Suwanda et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5561730 | Lochkovic et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565242 | Buttrick, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5595355 | Haines | Jan 1997 | A |
5614288 | Bustos | Mar 1997 | A |
5614482 | Baker et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636648 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656371 | Kawahigashi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660932 | Durston | Aug 1997 | A |
5691870 | Gebara | Nov 1997 | A |
5708084 | Hauenstein et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5733823 | Sugioka et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753861 | Hansen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5779229 | Lirette | Jul 1998 | A |
5852116 | Cree et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856405 | Hofmann | Jan 1999 | A |
5886072 | Linsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912436 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925601 | McSherry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926394 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933945 | Thomeer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938180 | Walsten | Aug 1999 | A |
5998772 | Kirma et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006909 | Dunne | Dec 1999 | A |
6057018 | Schmidt | May 2000 | A |
6064073 | Hoogenraad | May 2000 | A |
6080489 | Mehta | Jun 2000 | A |
6100467 | Kroulik | Aug 2000 | A |
6114036 | Rinehart | Sep 2000 | A |
6137058 | Moe et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138934 | Helton | Oct 2000 | A |
6146699 | Bonicel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159617 | Foster et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160940 | Summers et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179665 | Rossman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188026 | Cope et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6228495 | Lupia et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270849 | Popoola et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281431 | Cumley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327841 | Bertini et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347561 | Uneme et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6383567 | Ager et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6395989 | Lecoeuvre et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6416813 | Valls Prats | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418704 | Bertini et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6443457 | Daoud | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461730 | Bachmann et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472899 | Osburn et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6474057 | Bertini et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6534717 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6565242 | Dai | May 2003 | B2 |
6640533 | Bertini et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646205 | Hase et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655104 | Kadotani et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6810188 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850681 | Lepont et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6883782 | Ames et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886484 | Thomas | May 2005 | B2 |
6903264 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906258 | Hirai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6977280 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7019217 | Bryant | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7041909 | Hiel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053308 | Prats | May 2006 | B2 |
7128306 | Ames et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136556 | Brown et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144952 | Court et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149392 | Chen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182306 | Tsutsumida et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185838 | Mullebrouck et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7246789 | Ames et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7411129 | Kummer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7478794 | Gohlke et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7557301 | Kummer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563983 | Bryant | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7608783 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
D604594 | Lin | Nov 2009 | S |
D605499 | Gaudron | Dec 2009 | S |
7672562 | Fandl et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7749024 | Chambers et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775506 | Hoffend, III | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D630501 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2011 | S |
D632165 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
D635450 | Deese | Apr 2011 | S |
7951440 | Butler, III | May 2011 | B2 |
7952020 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8022301 | Bryant et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8043119 | Chambers et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8590862 | Schauerte | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8800967 | Carlson | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020002221 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010252 | Lecoeuvre et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020043391 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030010965 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030098176 | Mesaki et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030131923 | Shah | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040007308 | Houston et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040041136 | Ames et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040198909 | Breitscheidel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050019353 | Prinz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023029 | Mammeri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036753 | Will et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050180725 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070098340 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070280621 | Livingston et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080131592 | Kummer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090070966 | Gohlke et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090211780 | Auphand et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100176357 | Wen | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100230134 | Chambers et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236045 | Galindo et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236811 | Sasse et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110101290 | Carlson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133141 | Carlson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130218325 | Carlson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150034891 | Carlson | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4410456 | Mar 1994 | DE |
0283132 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0364717 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0544411 | Jun 1993 | EP |
1524294 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2674364 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2069444 | Aug 1981 | GB |
59159708 | Sep 1984 | JP |
61076409 | Apr 1986 | JP |
01166410 | Jun 1986 | JP |
63094503 | Jun 1988 | JP |
01110013 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01144504 | Jun 1989 | JP |
01307110 | Dec 1989 | JP |
05266720 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06057145 | Mar 1994 | JP |
09045143 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09251811 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10012051 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H11134069 | May 1999 | JP |
2001-24601 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002135968 | May 2002 | JP |
2002231065 | Aug 2002 | JP |
200126401 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003323820 | Nov 2003 | JP |
WO-8900763 | Jan 1989 | WO |
WO 0040653 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0181969 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0190230 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2004062072 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2005042226 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2006001696 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006016896 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2007084745 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action mailed Nov. 3, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/456,594. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,810. |
Gator EK425 Battery-Powered Crimping Tool Instruction Manual, Dec. 2006, 14 pages. |
Office Action mailed Feb. 24, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/456,594. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,810. |
K425BG and K425O Mechanical Crimping Tools Instruction Manual, Oct. 2002, 4 pages. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/456,594. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,810. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/223,889. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,992 Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,992 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 11, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/007,827 Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/007,827 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 27, 2013. |
Photograph taken Mar. 28, 2011 of Pulling-Eye from Utility Industries, Inc. crimped to conductor (believed to be used in similar fashion and/or re-sold by Applicant as early as Aug. 2007). |
Mexican Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010 in Mexican Application No. MX/f.2010/00205. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 29, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 29/384,954. |
Howard & Howard letter to Mr. Thomas C. Wright dated Feb. 7, 2008 re U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441. |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-011 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (2pp) (http://dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-321 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (2pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB25-504 composition, Jan. 2, 2002 (4pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB40-006 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-002 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-320 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-004 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-008 composition, Mar. 4, 2008 (1pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-010 composition, Jan. 16, 2001 (2pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-313 and MB50-314 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (4pp), (www.dowcorning.com). |
Dow Corning articles, “Siloxane additive minimizes friction in fibre optice cable conduit,” 2001, (2pp) (http:dowcorning.com). |
Crompton Corporation brochure on Amides (approx. 2003) (27pp). |
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-33PA” (approx. 2000) (1pp). |
Axel Plastics Research Laboratories, Inc., Product Data Sheet re “Mold Wiz, INT-40DHT” (approx. 2001) (1pp). |
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Flyer entitled “Teflon” (Aug. 14, 2003) (1p) (www.dupont.com). |
General Electric Company, Brochure entitled “Ge Silicones—Fluids, Emulsions & Specialties” (2001) (19pp). |
Witco Corporation, Brochure entitled “Fatty Acids, Glycerine, Triglycerides” (1997) (22pp). |
Crompton Corporation brochure entited “Vinyl Additives Product Guide” (2002) (16pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/675,441, Dec. 27, 2008 (4pp). |
Mar. 20, 2007 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,596. |
Nov. 2, 2005 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487. |
Jun. 8, 2006 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,487. |
Dec. 15, 2005 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807. |
Jun. 8, 2006 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/135,807. |
Jun. 9, 2008 Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766. |
Dow Corning presentation entitled “MBs to Improve CoF-Injection Moulding & Extrusion,” from file entitled “DC (multibase) Masterbatch training 2004.ppt”; date uncertain, 8 pages. |
Dow Corning, Dow Corning MB50-011 Masterbatch Product Information, Ultra-high molecular weight siloxane polymer dispersed in nylon 6, 1999, pp. 1-5. |
Richard Marquis et al.; “An introduction to Fatty Acid Amide Slip and Anti-Block Agents,” Polymers, Laminations & Coatings Conference in San Francisco, CA. from Aug. 30 to Sep. 3, 1998 (Tappi Press 1998). |
J.B. Decoste, “Friction of Vinyl Chloride Plastics”; Sociery of Plastics Engineers Journal, vol. 25, Oct. 1969, pp. 67-71; Robert D. Forger (publisher″, Manchester, NH. |
Cerro Wire, Inc., Request for Inter Partes Reexamination under 35 USC 311-318 (USPTO); Sep. 26, 2008, pp. 1-90. |
Southwire Company, Response to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination (USPTO); Oct. 21 ,2008; pp. 1-27. |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand for Jury Trial (with Exhibit A), Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC, U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Aug. 12, 2008; 16 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand for Jury Trial; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Oct. 16, 2008; 8pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Southwire's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit (with Declarations of Winn Wise and Holly S. Hawkins); Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia Newnan Division; Jan. 2, 2009; 75 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Southwire Company's Motion, Memorandum and [Proposed] Order to Dismiss Cerro Wire Inc.'s Defenses of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.D.C. 102 and 103; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Newnan Division; Jan. 2, 2009; 19 pp (US). |
Southwire Company v. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Defendant Cerro Wire's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit; Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia; Northern Division; Jan. 16, 2009; 17 pp (US). |
Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 564551, dated Aug. 14, 2009. |
United Statements Patent and Trademark Office; Order Granting/Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129 (with attached PTO SB/08) (Application/Control No. 95/000,403); Dec. 5, 2008, 25 pages. |
Southwire Company vs. Cerro Wire, Inc.; Court Order Granting Stay of Litigation pending USPTO's Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,129, Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-092-JTC; U.S.D.C.; Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, May 12, 2009, 13 pp (US). |
Encore Wire, Inc.; Introduction Portion of Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. §§1.193 (Control No. 95/000,573); Oct. 8, 2010; pp. 1-74 (US). |
Wiles, John, “Clarifying Confusing Cables,” Home Power #66, Aug./Sep. 1998. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/554,224, filed Feb. 12, 2004, Carlson et al., 3 pp. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Mar. 14, 2007, 10 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Mar. 4, 2008, 6 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Jul. 12, 2006, 13 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/952,294, Aug. 7, 2007, 11 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Aug. 7, 2008, 8 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,766, Feb. 9, 2009, 11 pp (US). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Dec. 5, 2008 ( 12 pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Jan. 8, 2009 (11 pp). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/017,222, Feb. 27, 2009 (8 pp). |
Extending European Search Report for European Application No. EP 067397141.1, dated Nov. 12, 2009. |
International Search Report Mailed May 17, 2010 from WO 2010/107932 (International App. No. PCT/US2010/027684). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Mailed Aug. 21, 2006 from WO 2007/81372 (International App. No. PCT/US06/11069). |
International Search Report Mailed Oct. 20, 2006 from WO 2006/127711 (International App. No. PCT/US06/19923). |
International Search Report Mailed Dec. 20, 2005 from WO 2006/16895 (International App. No. PCT/US05/05165). |
Kevin J. Ryan et al.; “Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Functional Siloxane Additives in Polymers. Effects on Processing and Properties”; Journal of Vinyl & Additive Technology, Mar. 2000, vol. 6, No. 1 (Mar. 2000). |
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Standard for Safety UL-719 for Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cables, Eleventh Edition (Mar. 21, 2002). |
Abstract of Abstract of FR 2674364, Sep. 25, 1992, 3 pgs. |
Abstract of JP 01-144504, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Jun. 6, 1989, 1 pg. |
Abstract of JP 2002231065, Patent Abstracts of Japan, and machine translation, Aug. 16, 2002, 12 pgs. |
Wild, “The Effects of Silicone Polymer Additions on the Processing and Properties of an Isotactic Propylene Homopolymer”. |
“Grips Double Lock System,” new product information page [retrieved on Mar. 18, 2012], Retrieved from Internet http://www.maxis-tools.com/, 1 page. |
“Grips Maxis,” product information p. [retrieved on Mar. 18, 2010], Retrieved from Internet http://www.maxis-tools.com/products/grips/, 1 page. |
“Utility Industries, Inc (UII),” product information page [retrieved Mar. 18, 2010], Retrieved from Internet http://utilityindustries.com/products.html, 1 page. |
“Greenlee,” product information page [retrieved on Mar. 19, 2010], Retrieved from Internet http://www.mygreenlee.com/Products/main.shtml?greenlee—category—id=10&product—category=109&abodb—next—page=1&portalProcess—2=showGreenleePRoductTemplate&upc—number=31855, 1 page. |
Pulling Eye—Single Conductor Assembly Instructions [retrieved on Apr. 28, 20100], Retrieved from Internet http://utilityindustries.com. |
Dow Corning Product Information sheet re Dow Corning MB50-001 composition, Jan. 15, 2001 (6pp), (www.dowcoming.com). |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,992. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated May 12, 2010 in PCT Application No. PCT/US10/28113. |
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2010 in Canada Application No. CA133807. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2010 in Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/340,663. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2010 in Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/340,662. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 23, 2010 in Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/340,662. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 22, 2010 in Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/368,014. |
User Guide, “Reusable Power Eye” by Condux International, Inc., Literature Part No. 08917089, Revision No. 2.5, Copyright 2008; 2 pages. [Retrieved from http://www.condux.com]. |
Installation Guide, “Crimp-On Pulling Eyes” by Condux International, Inc., Literature Part No. 08920097, Revision No. 2.00, Copyright 1998, 16 pages. [Retrieved from http://www.condux.com]. |
DCD Design Catalog, Cable Pulling Eyes Section, “Power Cable Pulling Eyes 00925 / 24000 / 24100 Series,” p. 24. [Retrieved from www.dcddesign.com Jul. 2007 Catalog]; 1 page. |
DCD Design Catalog, Cable Pulling Eyes Section, “24000 Power-GripÔ (lug) 24100 Power-GripÔ (clevis),” p. 25. [Retrieved from www.dcddesign.com Jul. 2007 Catalog]; 1 page. |
DCD Design Catalog, Cable Pulling Eyes Section, “Multiplex Pushing Eye 24200 Series,” p. 26. [Retrieved from www.dcddesign.com Jul. 2007 Catalog]; 1 page. |
DCD Design Catalog, Cable Pulling Eyes Section, “Mimi Grip 24500 Series / Pulling Harness 25000 Series,” p. 27. [Retrieved from www.dcddesign.com Jul. 2007 Catalog]; 1 page. |
RectorSeal “Wire Snagger” product information page, [Retrieved May 31, 2011 from http://www.rectorseal.com/index.php?site—id=1&product—id=278]. |
Greenlee, product catalog, [Retrieved May 31, 2011 from http://www.greenlee.com/cat—docs/Cable—Pulling09.pdf]; pp. 177-182. |
“Recommended Practice for Installing Aluminum Building Wire and Cable” NECA/AA 104-2000; published by National Electrical Contractors Association, 2000. |
Mexican Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2015 in Mexican National Phase Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/009816 and English translation of the Mexican Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2015 in Mexican National Phase Patent Application No. MX/a/2013/009816. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,810. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,810. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,810. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2017 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,775,343. |
Patent Board Decision in U.S. Appl. No. 14/456,594 dated Nov. 14, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130218325 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61162589 | Mar 2009 | US | |
61174210 | Apr 2009 | US | |
61221216 | Jun 2009 | US | |
61244919 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12726992 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13836319 | US |