Integrator topology for continuous integration

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6570432
  • Patent Number
    6,570,432
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 26, 2002
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 27, 2003
    22 years ago
Abstract
Provided are integrator circuit topologies that enable continuous integration without reset of the integrator circuit. One such integrator circuit includes a first integrator and a second integrator, each of the two integrators having a non-inverting terminal. Each of the non-inverting terminals is connected to an input node to alternately receive an input current for continuous integrator circuit integration without integrator circuit reset. The inverting terminal of the second integrator can be connected to an inverting terminal of the first integrator. The non-inverting terminal of the second integrator can be connected to an output of the first integrator through a first capacitor, and an output of the second integrator can be connected to a non-inverting terminal of the first integrator through a second capacitor. With such a capacitor connection, the capacitors alternately charge and discharge, based on integrator input current that is alternately directed between the non-inverting terminals of the integrators.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to integrators.




Integrators have high linearity, wide bandwidth, and low noise characteristics. Integrators, however, require a reset interval to discharge the capacitor in the integrator's feedback loop which results in significant “dead” times in measurements and harmful transients on the integrator's input. Additionally, the rapid discharge interval aggravates the problem of dielectric absorption, thereby undermining the lower limit of instrument precision.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, an integrator


10


includes a feedback loop having a switch


12


in parallel with a feedback capacitor


14


. The switch


12


allows the feedback capacitor


14


to discharge when the switch


12


is closed. Placing one or more strings of series resistors and capacitors in parallel with the feedback capacitor


14


with or without the switch


12


reduces at least some of the harmful effects of this discharge. However, even in some arrangements having multiple capacitors, dielectric absorption is still a problem since the charge in the series capacitors is redistributed with the feedback capacitor


14


.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention overcomes these unwanted effects of integrator reset by providing integrator circuit topologies that enable continuous integration, without the need for reset of the integrator circuit. One such integrator circuit includes a first integrator and a second integrator, each of the two integrators having a non-inverting terminal. Each of the non-inverting terminals is connected to an input node to alternately receive an input current for continuous integrator circuit integration without integrator circuit reset.




In further configurations, the inverting terminal of the second integrator can be connected to an inverting terminal of the first integrator. The non-inverting terminal of the second integrator can be connected to an output of the first integrator through a first capacitor, and the output of the second integrator can be connected to the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator through a second capacitor. In operation, the first integrator and the second integrator have voltages on respective ones of the inverting and non-inverting terminals that are substantially equal, and the two integrators produce output voltages that are complementary.




In a further integrator circuit provided by the invention, at least one integrator is provided, having an input for receiving an input current. A plurality of integrator feedback capacitors are provided, with each capacitor being connected to alternately charge and discharge, based on the integrator input current. This cooperative charging and discharging enables continuous integrator circuit integration without integrator circuit reset.




These integrator circuit topologies can be employed in a wide variety of applications in which low signal level, precise measurements are required. For example, in one biological application, the first integrator and the second integrator can be operated to each introduce an output voltage into a chemical bath on either side of a biological membrane. In this application, the integrator circuit is configured to detect fluctuations of ion channels. In another application, e.g., the integrator circuit can be configured for charge detection.




These applications are particularly well-served by the integrator circuit of the invention in its elimination of a need for rapid discharging of feedback capacitors during operation. The integrator circuit of the invention can perpetually integrate incoming current signals, such as low-level transducer signals, to produce an output of a continuous flow of two complementary voltages. This perpetual integration eliminates “dead time” and input transients, compensates for charge injection at the integrator input, and reduces the harmful effects of dielectric absorption. At the same time, the integrator circuit maintains a high degree of operational linearity, produces a low level of noise, and can accommodate a wide bandwidth of input signals.




Other features and advantages of the invention are provided in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, and in the claims.











DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of a conventional integrator.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of a chopper stabilizing circuit.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of the block diagram of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

is a graph showing the output of the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIGS. 5-6

are graphs showing the chopper stabilization of the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 7

is an unfolded view of the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIGS. 8-9

are graphs showing the output of the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIGS. 10-11

are graphs showing the response of the integrator of

FIG. 3

to input current.





FIGS. 12-13

are graphs showing the charge injection compensation of the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 14

is a graph showing currents detectable by the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 15

is a graph showing charge detection by a conventional integrator circuit.





FIG. 16

is a graph showing charge detection by the integrator circuit of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 17

is a schematic diagram of the differentiator circuit of FIG.


2


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 2

, a chopper stabilizing circuit


20


includes a switching circuit


22


, an integrator circuit


24


, a sensing circuit


26


, a control circuit


28


, and a differentiator circuit


30


. In general, the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


has a topology and is controlled in a manner that eliminates the need for rapid discharging of feedback capacitors in the integrator circuit


24


. In particular, and as will be discussed in greater detail below, this advantage is accomplished by alternating the signal current from the switching circuit


22


to the integrator circuit


24


. In this way, the integrator circuit


24


can perpetually integrate these incoming current signals (low-level transducer signals) and output a continuous flow of two complementary voltages. The sensing circuit


26


detects when one of the complementary voltages reaches a threshold value and notifies the control circuit


28


. The control circuit


28


responds by sending a signal to the switching circuit


22


. This signal changes the position of switches in the switching circuit


22


, thereby alternating the signal current to the integrator circuit


24


. The differentiator circuit


30


receives the complementary voltages output by the integrator circuit


24


and provides a demodulated differentiation bit stream representing the slope of the complementary voltages. As will be described in more detail below, this chopper stabilizing circuit


20


eliminates dead time and input transients, compensates for charge injection at the input, and reduces the harmful effects of dielectric absorption. At the same time, the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


maintains high linearity, low noise, and wide bandwidth.




In the layout of the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


, the switching circuit


22


has an input at a first node


32


for receiving an input signal. The input signal includes the driving current/voltage for the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


from a load, a current source, and/or a voltage source. The switching circuit


22


has an output at a second node


34


that is determined by the position of the switch(es) included in the switching circuit


22


. The integrator circuit


24


has an input at the second node


34


for receiving an input signal from the switching circuit


22


and an output at a third node


36


. The sensing circuit


26


has an input at the third node


36


for receiving an input signal from the integrator circuit


24


and an output at a fourth node


38


. The control circuit


28


has an input at the fourth node


38


for receiving an input signal from the sensing circuit


26


and output at a fifth node


40


and a sixth node


42


. The switching circuit


22


has an input for receiving an input signal from the control circuit


28


at the fifth node


40


. This input signal controls the position of the switch(es) in the switching circuit


22


.




The differentiator


30


is shown in

FIG. 2

, though its presence is not necessary to ensure proper functioning of the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


. If it is not present, the integrator circuit


24


and the control circuit


28


may not necessarily have outputs at the third node


36


and the sixth node


42


, respectively. The differentiator circuit


30


has an input at the third node


36


for receiving an input signal from the integrator circuit


24


and at the sixth node


42


for receiving an input signal from the control circuit


28


. The input signal at the sixth node


42


controls the switch(es) included in the differentiator circuit


30


. The differentiator also has an output at a seventh node


44


.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, one particular embodiment of a chopper stabilizing circuit


20


includes a switching circuit


22


, an integrator circuit


24


, a sensing circuit


26


, and a control circuit


28


. The chopper stabilizing circuit


20


eliminates the need for rapid discharging of feedback capacitors


60




a-b


(preferably Teflon®) in the integrator circuit


24


by alternating the signal current from the switching circuit


22


to two integrators


62




a-b


included in the integrator circuit


24


. In this way, one feedback capacitor discharges while the other charges, thereby providing two inversely related output voltages (Vout+, Vout−) at Vout nodes


36




a-b


. Once either of the output voltages reaches a predetermined threshold value (Vth), a regenerative comparator


76




a-b


included in the sensing circuit


26


and connected to this output voltage is tripped. Hysteresis prevents the sensing circuit


26


from causing false resets. The comparator


76




a-b


triggers a D-type flip-flop


78


through a NAND gate


79


, both included in the control circuit


28


. As the flip-flop


78


changes state, the outputs Q and Q-bar connected to the switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


cause them to reverse position. This reversal preserves the same orientation with respect to the load


72


, maintaining a uniform bias, while alternating the signal current to the integrator circuit


24


.




More specifically, the switching circuit


22


includes two pairs of two symmetric switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


. The switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


may be any type of standard MOS (metal oxide semiconductor) switch, e.g., MAXIM 326. Only one set of switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


is closed at a time, each closed switch providing a path for a signal to the non-inverting input terminal of an operational amplifier (opamp)


70




a-b


, e.g., Burr-Brown OP627, included in the integrators


62




a-b


. When the phase one (>1) switches


66




a-b


are closed, a load


72


provides the input current (Io) to the first opamp


70




a


while a voltage source


74


provides the bias voltage (Vb) to the second opamp


70




b


. When the phase two (>2) switches are closed, the load


72


and the voltage source


74


provide current/voltage to the other opamp


70




a-b


. The values of Vout+ at the Vout node


36




a


and Vout− at the Vout node


36




b


depend on the position of these switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b.







FIG. 4

shows the inverse relationship between Vout+ (Vcf2) and Vout− (Vcf1). In this scenario, the >2 switches


68




a-b


begin closed and the feedback capacitors


60




a-b


initially are discharged, so Vout+ and Vout− begin at Vb. When Io flows through the load


72


, Vout+ and Vout− alternately and inversely ramp up and down in accordance with:









V



t


=


Io
Cf

.











When Io decreases at a time t


1


, this relationship ceases.




The integrator circuit


24


can effectively integrate forever (constantly flowing Io), with negligible glitching during phase switching. This lack of glitch is helped by the symmetry of input stage of the integrator circuit


24


. Every input stage node


80




a-c


sees one switch


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


turn on and another turn off during a phase transition. The already low charge injection of the switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


is then effectively reduced to tens of femtoCoulombs (fC). Additionally, the symmetric pair requires no voltage drop across a switch


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


, aiding in keeping leakage currents below a picoAmp (pA). The voltages at the input stage nodes


80




a-c


are substantially the same.




Referring to

FIGS. 5 and 6

, it is appreciated that offset may be a problem as in

FIG. 5

, but techniques exist to alleviate this problem, e.g., a stabilizing circuit.

FIG. 5

shows the chop before stabilization, and

FIG. 6

shows the chopper stabilization of the integrator circuit


24


.




Referring to

FIG. 7

, an unfolded view of the integrator circuit


24


helps demonstrate the manner in which the circuit functions. The compensation of the integrator circuit


24


may be broken down into two sections: minor and major loops. The minor loop concerns the stability of each opamp


70




a-b


; the major loop comprises the total feedback loop around the integrator. The major loop encompasses a unity gain inverter with a voltage divider formed by the first feedback capacitor


60




a


reacting with the capacitance off the input stage of the first opamp


70




a


. The input capacitance is dominated by the opamp input capacitance and the parasitics of the switches


66




a-b


,


68




a-b


. The ratio of the capacitive voltage divider in this embodiment is approximately ten, which will keep the major loop crossover well below that of the minor loops. The minor loops are stabilized with the addition of shunt capacitances


82




a-b


, which help compensate for phase lag due to shunt resistors


84




a-b


(preferably metal film) reacting with the input capacitance of the opamps


70




a-b


. With the bandwidth of the opamps


70




a-b


on the order of 10 MHz in this embodiment, the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


should be able to track currents with a bandwidth of approximately 1 MHz.





FIGS. 8-13

further demonstrate the functioning of the integrator circuit


24


.

FIG. 8

shows Vout+ and Vout− with 50 μs per horizontal division, the typical reset duration in standard integrators, e.g., Axopatch


200


B and nuclear physics instrumentation.

FIG. 9

shows a zoom in on the reset transient, with the switching occurring of the order of 500 ns, e.g., 700 ns. The 2 pF feedback capacitor


60




a-b


and a residual voltage jump of 20 mV signifies under 40 fC of charge injection.

FIG. 10

shows the response of the integrator circuit


24


(top trace) to input current (bottom trace), a 2 nA peak-to-peak triangle wave. Because of this response, the integrator circuit


24


could be used for direct digitization of input current via single-slope integration by measuring the period between resets.

FIG. 11

shows the response of the integrator circuit


24


in

FIG. 10

superimposed with a 100 kHz sinusoid supplied by a 2 pF capacitor at the input.

FIG. 12

shows the charge injection before compensation, and

FIG. 13

shows the charge injection after compensation by the integrator circuit


24


.




Now referring to

FIG. 14

, the integrator circuit


24


can be used to detect the fluctuations of ion channels important in cell signaling and biological transport. These currents range from 0.1 pA to 100 pA, with bandwidths of 10 kHz. The integrator circuit


24


allows for measuring these currents without glitches from resetting.




Now referring to

FIGS. 15 and 16

, the integrator circuit


24


can also be used for charge detection. For example, x-ray and particle detectors output charge pulses that are usually integrated. Whenever a conventional integrator hits a limit value as in

FIG. 15

, it must reset and data can be lost. Using the integrator circuit


24


, the dead-time (lost data) is greatly reduced by the absence of capacitor resets as shown in FIG.


16


.




A differentiator circuit


30


, shown in

FIG. 17

, may be part of a chopper stabilizing circuit. The differentiator circuit


30


includes two switches


92




a-b


. The switches


92




a-b


may be any type of standard MOS (metal oxide semiconductor) switch, e.g., MAXIM 326. Each switch


92




a-b


is either in a horizontal (>1) position, e.g., switch


92




a


from a top start node


94




a


to a top end node


96




a


, or a diagonal (>2) position, e.g., switch


92




a


from the top start node


94




a


to a bottom end node


96




b


, at any given time. Each closed switch


92




a-b


provides a path for a signal at entering nodes


36




a-b


to travel to the inverting terminal or to the non-inverting terminal of an opamp


100


. Input from a control circuit (not shown) determines the position of the switches


92




a-b


. If the differentiator circuit is connected to the chopper stabilizing circuit


20


(see FIG.


2


), the output from the control circuit


78


provides the phase information for the switches


92




a-b.






A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. An integrator circuit comprising:a first integrator; and a second integrator having an inverting terminal connected to an inverting terminal of the first integrator, having a non-inverting terminal connected to an output of the first integrator through a first capacitor, and having an output connected to a non-inverting terminal of the first integrator through a second capacitor.
  • 2. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator and the non-inverting terminal of the second integrator are each connected to a distinct switch in a switching circuit.
  • 3. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein, in operation, the first integrator and the second integrator have voltages on their respective ones of the inverting and non-inverting terminals that are substantially equal.
  • 4. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein, in operation, the first integrator and the second integrator produce output voltages that are complementary.
  • 5. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein, in operation, the first integrator and the second integrator each produce an output voltage that is provided in a chemical bath on either side of a biological membrane.
  • 6. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein the integrator circuit is configured to detect fluctuations of ion channels.
  • 7. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein the integrator circuit is configured for charge detection.
  • 8. The integrator circuit of claim 1 wherein each of the first and second integrators comprise an operational amplifier.
  • 9. An integrator circuit comprising:at least two integrators, each having an input connected to alternately receive an input current; and a plurality of integrator feedback capacitors, each integrator feedback capacitor connected to alternately charge and discharge, based on integrator input current, in a cooperating manner for continuous integrator circuit integration without integrator circuit reset.
  • 10. The integrator circuit of claim 9 wherein the plurality of integrator feedback capacitors comprises two feedback capacitors, each feedback capacitor associated with a corresponding one of the two integrators.
  • 11. An integrator circuit comprising:a first integrator, having a non-inverting terminal; and a second integrator, having a non-inverting terminal, the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator and the non-inverting terminal of the second integrator each being connected to an input node to alternately receive an input current for continuous integrator circuit integration without integrator circuit reset.
  • 12. The integrator circuit of claim 11 wherein the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator and the non-inverting terminal of the second integrator are each connected to a distinct switch in a switching circuit to alternately receive an input current based on switch position.
  • 13. The integrator circuit of claim 12 wherein each distinct switch is connected to alternate a voltage bias between the first and second integrators, based on switch position, as the input current is alternately received by the two integrators.
  • 14. The integrator circuit of claim 12 wherein the input current comprises a current from a load, and wherein the connection of the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator to a distinct switch and the connection of the non-inverting terminal of the second integrator to a distinct switch are each configured with respect to an input node to preserve a uniform load voltage bias and a uniform input current orientation through the load for any switch position.
  • 15. The integrator circuit of claim 12 wherein the input current comprises a current from a load, and wherein the connection of the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator to a distinct switch and the connection of the non-inverting terminal of the second integrator to a distinct switch are each configured with respect to an integrator circuit input node to maintain a constant flow of load input current for any switch position.
  • 16. The integrator circuit of claim 11 wherein each of the first and second integrators includes a corresponding feedback capacitor, the connection of the non-inverting terminal of the first integrator and the non-inverting terminal of the second integrator each to an input node being configured to charge one of the feedback capacitors while discharging the other feedback capacitor.
  • 17. The integrator circuit of claim 11 further comprising an output node connected to produce an integrator output signal comprising a continuous flow of two complementary voltages.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of copending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/502,134, filed Feb. 11, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,380,790.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. N65236-98-1-5407, awarded by DARPA. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (12)
Number Name Date Kind
4727330 Funk Feb 1988 A
4764752 Ormond Aug 1988 A
4816745 Schneider Mar 1989 A
4837527 Sauer Jun 1989 A
5083091 Frick et al. Jan 1992 A
5113085 Schäfer et al. May 1992 A
5363055 Ribner Nov 1994 A
5550498 Kwan et al. Aug 1996 A
5812023 Jones Sep 1998 A
5977803 Tsugai Nov 1999 A
6084450 Smith et al. Jul 2000 A
6194946 Fowers Feb 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Enz et al., “Circuit Techniques for Reducing the Effects of Op-Amp Imperfections: Autozeroing, Correlated Double Sampling, and Chopper Stabilization,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 84, No. 11, pp. 1584-1614, Nov. 1996.
Sigworth, “Electronic Design of the Patch Clamp,” Chapter 1, pp. 3-34, in Single-Channel Recording, 2nd Edition, Sakmann and Neher, Editors, Plenum Press, New York, New York, 1995.
Denison et al., “A New Integrating Patch Clamp Amplifier Eliminates Discontinuous ‘Resets’,” Abstracts of the Biophysical Society 44th Annual Meeting, Biophysical Journal, vol. 78, No. 1, Part 2 of 2, p. 267A, Jan. 2000.