Integrity testing method and apparatus for delivering vapor to the uterus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10179019
  • Patent Number
    10,179,019
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 21, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 15, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A method and system of providing therapy to a patient's uterus is provided, which can include any number of features. The method can include the steps of inserting a uterine device into the uterus and performing a uterine integrity test to determine that the uterus is intact and not perforated. If it is determined that the uterus is not perforated, a patency test can be performed to determine that the uterine device is not clogged or embedded in tissue. If the uterus is intact and the device is not clogged or embedded in tissue, the uterus can be treated with the uterine device, e.g., uterine ablation. Systems for performing these methods are also disclosed.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to uterine procedures incorporating a distension media such as a fluid or a gas that could be used with endoscopic procedures or other visualization systems such ultrasound or fluoroscopy. The present disclosure is particular suited for endometrial ablation of the uterine lining. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to endometrial ablation with a heated vapor.


BACKGROUND

Endometrial ablation (i.e., the removal or destruction of the endometrial lining of the uterus) is used as an alternative to hysterectomy for treating menorrhagia, or other uterine diseases. One prior technique for performing endometrial ablation employs a resectoscope (i.e., a hysteroscope with a built-in wire loop or other ablative devices) that is inserted transcervically into the uterus, and uses radio-frequency electrical current (RF current) to remove or coagulate the endometrial tissue. These standard techniques typically are performed in a hospital setting and importantly utilize hysteroscopy for visualization of the procedure while treating the uterine lining.


Some approaches make use of heated fluid to ablate the endometrium. For example, early journal articles describe the use of steam to treat uterine hemorrhage. The use of steam for this purpose was later discredited, apparently due to patient morbidity and mortality. See, e.g., Fuller U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,571. More recent descriptions of the use of injecting hot fluid into the uterus have been described. Uterine therapies employing a contained fluid have also been described.


In an effort to simplify the procedure, approaches have been developed that do not require concurrent hysteroscopic visualization. In practice, many of these techniques recommend that the physician or user employ hysteroscopy to visualize and inspect the uterine cavity prior to performing the endometrial ablation procedure. In addition, hysteroscopy may be employed at the conclusion of the endometrial ablation procedure as a method to inspect the uterine cavity post treatment. During this hysteroscopic inspection, the physician is verifying that the uterine cavity is not perforated although perforations may not be readily apparent even with hysteroscopic visualization. In general, a physician seeks to avoid perforations for many reasons including the potential for unintended injuries to neighboring organs and maintaining or confining the treatment area to specifically the uterine cavity in the case of endometrial ablation procedures.


Endometrial ablation techniques that do not require active hysteroscopic visualization during treatment operation are commonly referred to as “blind” techniques since the physician is using tactile feel, or markers and indicia on the endometrial ablation device to indicate proper placement of the device in the uterine cavity. One of these particular devices utilizes a balloon-based system using heated saline as the thermal energy source for the ablation of tissue. High frequency, or radiofrequency (RF), energy has also been used to perform thermal ablation of endometrial tissue. Current products for performing endometrial ablation include the NOVASURE® procedure and a system marketed under the trade name THERMACHOICE®, by Ethicon, Inc. of Somerville, N.J. Cryogenic ablation, or “cryoablation,” such as HER OPTION® from American Medical Systems, Inc., is another endometrial treatment approach. All of the products above are characterized as “blind” or not requiring direct hysteroscopic visualization during the treatment.


In utilizing an endometrial ablation technology that does not require hysteroscopic visualization, it would be beneficial to employ a test to verify that the uterine cavity is intact or unperforated prior to performing the treatment. Such tests are referred to as uterine integrity tests and these tests can be performed with endometrial ablation procedures and any procedure of the uterus or hollow body cavity or organ. In addition, these tests can be used with hysteroscopic procedures since a perforation may not be readily detected even under direct vision.


Integrity tests employ saline or gas, preferably carbon dioxide gas, as agents to verify if the uterine cavity is intact in regards to holding fluid or gas pressure. The gas or fluid is supplied under pressure to the uterine cavity and a leak in the uterine cavity, whether it is a perforation, an unsealed cervical canal, or the effect of excess fluid exiting the fallopian tubes, can be discerned. Stern et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,720) and Sampson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,780, U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,184, U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,183, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,063,670) describe such pressure techniques while other approaches check for fluid imbalances between an input source and output collection using volume measurements. Other approaches mention using flow rate and pressure measurements.


SUMMARY

A method of performing a patency test for a uterine ablation device is provided, comprising inserting the uterine ablation device into a uterus of a patient, inflating an outflow valve to seal an outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device, delivering gas or fluid from an inflow lumen of the uterine ablation device into the uterus, partially deflating the outflow valve to remove gas or fluid from the uterus with the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device, and determining that the uterine ablation device is not clogged or embedded in tissue if a flow rate of gas or fluid is observed above a threshold value in the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device.


In some embodiments, the partially deflating step further comprises pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve at a specified duty cycle until flow of gas or fluid through the outflow lumen begins.


In one embodiment, the partially deflating step further comprises pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve a specified duty cycle until a uterine pressure decreases.


In yet another embodiment, the partially deflating step further comprises pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve at a high duty cycle, then pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve at a lower duty cycle when flow of gas or fluid through the outflow lumen begins.


A method of performing a patency test for a uterine ablation device is provided, comprising inserting the uterine ablation device into a uterus of a patient, closing an outflow valve to seal an outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device, delivering gas or fluid from an inflow lumen of the uterine ablation device into the uterus, partially opening the outflow valve to remove gas or fluid from the uterus with the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device, and determining that the uterine ablation device is not clogged or embedded in tissue if a flow rate of gas or fluid is observed above a threshold value in the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device.


In some embodiments, the partially deflating step further comprises pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve at a specified duty cycle until flow of gas or fluid through the outflow lumen begins.


In one embodiment, the partially deflating step further comprises pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve a specified duty cycle until a uterine pressure decreases.


In yet another embodiment, the partially deflating step further comprises pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve at a high duty cycle, then pulsing the deflating of the outflow valve at a lower duty cycle when flow of gas or fluid through the outflow lumen begins.


A uterine ablation device is provided, comprising a shafted adapted to be inserted into a uterus of a patient, the shaft including an inflow outflow lumen and an inflow lumen, a gas/fluid source configured to deliver gas or fluid through the inflow lumen of the shaft into the uterus, an outflow valve configured to seal the outflow lumen of the shaft, a flow meter disposed in or near the outflow lumen and configured to measure a flow rate of gas or fluid in the outflow lumen, and an electronic controller operatively coupled to the gas/fluid source, the outflow valve, and the flow meter, the electronic controller being configured to partially open the outflow valve to remove gas or fluid from the uterus through the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device and determine that the uterine ablation device is not clogged or embedded in tissue if a flow rate of gas or fluid measured by the flow meter is above a threshold value.


In some embodiments, the threshold value is 5 ml/min.


In another embodiment, the electronic controller is configured to determine that the uterine ablation device is not clogged or embedded in tissue if the flow rate of gas or fluid measured by the flow meter is above the threshold value during a rolling patency test time window. In some embodiments, the patency test time window is a 5 second time period.


A method of performing a uterine integrity test is provided, comprising inserting a uterine device into the uterus of the patient, delivering gas or fluid from an inflow lumen of the uterine device into the uterus, measuring a flow rate of the gas or fluid during a rolling time window as it is delivered into the uterus, calculating a delta flow value from a minimum flow rate and a maximum flow of the gas or fluid during the rolling time window, and determining that the uterus is sealed if the flow rate decreases below a flow rate threshold value, and if the delta flow value is below the flow rate threshold value.


In some embodiments, the flow rate threshold value comprises 5 ml/min.


In another embodiment, the rolling time window comprises 15 seconds.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A-1B illustrate one embodiment of a uterine ablation device.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of a uterine ablation device inserted into a uterus.



FIG. 3 illustrates an integrity test of the uterine ablation device.



FIG. 4 illustrates a patency test of the uterine ablation device.



FIG. 5 charts the relationship between outflow valve pressure, uterine cavity pressure, and flow through a uterine ablation device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1A illustrates a uterine ablation device 100 sized and configured to access the endometrium of a uterus and to deliver a heated vapor to the uterus to ablate uterine tissue. The device can be configured to ablate and treat the endometrial lining of the uterus as an alternative to hysterectomy for treating menorrhagia or other uterine diseases. In some embodiments, the device 100 can be configured to gain access to the uterus by being inserted through a cannula or hysteroscope. The device 100 can include shaft 102, handle 104, distal tip 106, vapor ports 107, distal anchor or distal balloon 108, central or sealing balloon 110, proximal or positioning balloon 112, and connection lumens 118, which can couple the uterine ablation device to a control system (not shown) comprising a computer, a vapor generation system, and mechanisms configured to inflate and deflate the balloons as well as control the delivery and removal of integrity gas/fluid and vapor from the device. Additionally, connection lumens 118 can connect device 100 to a gas/fluid source 122, pressure regulator 124, and flow meter(s) 126. Vapor ports 107 near the distal tip 106 of the device can be fluidly coupled to the connection lumens 118 via inflow and outflow lumens (not shown). The vapor ports, inflow and outflow lumens, connection lumens, gas/fluid source, pressure regulator, and flow meters can be configured for testing the integrity of the patient's uterus, proper placement of the device, and verifying the presence of flow between the inflow and outflow lumens of the device.


The flow meter can be any flow meter as known in the art, including a thermal mass flow meter, an ultrasonic flow meter, a paddlewheel, or a variable area flow meter. In one embodiment, an ultrasonic flow meter that utilizes transit time and Doppler flow readings is advantageous since it is a non-contact system that does not need to physically interact with the fluid or gas media being employed in the integrity test. An ultrasonic flow meter can be easily adaptable to the exterior dimensions of an inflow lumen. In addition, a drip chamber within the inflow lumen can be used to manually visualize or record drips or flow from the fluid source as the integrity test indicates a sealed uterine cavity. In some uterine procedures, it may be advantageous to use other types of fluid besides saline including Lactated Ringers, non-isotonic solutions for certain electrosurgical procedures, gels, foams, fluids of varying viscosity for some ultrasonographic procedures, or other fluids used in uterine procedures.


In one embodiment, a one way valve can be placed in the inflow lumen on either side of the flow meter relative to the gas/fluid source. The one way valve can allow for the flow of gas/fluid (e.g., saline) from the gas/fluid source to the device and uterine cavity. The one way valve should not interfere with the operation of the flow meter and its readings. In operation, the uterine cavity is a muscle that can undergo significant contractions during the integrity and patency tests. These contractions can push the fluid retrograde back through the saline lumen and past the flow meter. In doing so, flow meter measurements can become difficult to interpret or may produce sinusoidal waves in the output readings. The placement of the one way valve in the inflow lumen can eliminate retrograde fluid flow and stabilize readings for the flow meter during episodes of uterine contractions.


Handle 104 can be an ergonomic handle and can include features and controls for using the device (e.g., buttons, levers, indicia for providing feedback for depths of insertion, valves, etc.), including features for controlling inflation of balloons 108, 110, and 112, and for controlling the delivery and removal of integrity test gas/fluid and heated vapor from the device. The handle can also include features and controls for testing the integrity of the patient's uterus, proper placement of the device and verifying the presence of flow between the inflow and outflow lumens of the device.


The balloons described herein can be any type of flexible balloon, such as rubber, latex, urethane, silicone, PET, LDPE, parylene, nylon, PE, combinations of these polymers, or can be manufactured from any other suitable material as known in the art. It should be noted that in some embodiments, the distal anchor comprises a balloon, but in other embodiments, the distal anchor comprises an expandable anchor or expansion mechanism, such as expandable frames, filters, nets, or cages, or non-expandable components that increase the diameter of the shaft of the uterine ablation device. For purposes of this disclosure, however, the distal anchor may be referred to as a distal anchor or as a distal balloon.


Shaft 102 can be configured to deliver a heated vapor from a remote boiler (not shown) through the device and out of vapor ports 107 in distal tip 106. The shaft can also be configured to return vapor that has exited the device, including bodily fluids, uterine materials, and condensate back through the vapor ports and into the shaft. In FIG. 1A, vapor ports 107 are illustrated as including both the vapor delivery and vapor return ports. However, in other embodiments, the vapor delivery ports can be separate and distinct from the vapor return ports. For example, vapor delivery ports are intended to provide an even distribution of heated vapor through a cavity, and may comprise small lumens or holes on the end of the shaft. The vapor return ports, in contrast, are intended to return used vapor and condensate, and may comprise larger slots to prevent blood, tissue, etc. from blocking or clogging the return lumen. The device comprises inflow and outflow gas and/or fluid delivery channels to conduct uterine integrity and patency tests. In some embodiments, the lumens to deliver and return vapor are the same as the channels to deliver and return gas and/or fluid for the uterine integrity and patency tests.


Referring still to FIG. 1A, uterine ablation device 100 is shown in a collapsed delivery configuration, with distal balloon 108, sealing balloon 110, and positioning balloon 112 deflated to reduce the cross sectional diameter of the device and can be 6 mm in diameter during insertion or smaller. When the device is in the delivery configuration, the reduced profile allows for easier access to through the vagina, cervical canal, and cervix to gain access to the uterus, and provides reduced patient discomfort during insertion. In some embodiments, the outer dimensions of the uterine ablation device are such that introduction of the device into the uterine cavity can be achieved without the need for mechanical or pharmacological dilation of the os prior to device introduction.



FIG. 1B illustrates the uterine ablation device 100 of FIG. 1A with all three balloons inflated, including distal balloon 108, central sealing balloon 110, and positioning balloon 112. The central balloon can be inflated with a fluid, such as saline, or alternatively, can be inflated with air. Although three balloons are depicted in FIG. 1B, in other variations one, two, four, or more balloons may be provided, and other balloon shapes may be used. The positioning balloon can be inflated with a room temperature medium, a cooled medium, or alternatively, a heated medium. In some embodiments, the central sealing balloon comprises a length along shaft 102 of approximately 15 mm to 25 mm. The central balloon can be disposed on the shaft between the distal balloon or anchor and the proximal balloon. In some embodiments, the central balloon is adjacent to both the distal balloon and the proximal balloon. In other embodiments, there is a small gap or space between one or more of the balloons. The length and position of the central balloon on the shaft ensures that when inflated, the central balloon seals the cervix off from the uterus near the internal os, but the balloon does not extend into the uterus or into the vagina of the patient. The central and proximal balloons can comprise any diameter, but preferably should have a diameter large enough to be able to engage the walls of the cervix and/or the vagina in the average female patient. For instance, the central balloon may have an inflated outer diameter of 10 mm and accommodate 9.5 psi of pressure in actual use. The proximal balloon can have a larger diameter, such as 17 mm and a lower inflation pressure of 7 psi.


Placement of the ablation device of FIGS. 1A-1B will now be described. The distal tip of the ablation device can be inserted past an external os into the cervical canal of the patient, and past an internal os of the patient to gain access to the uterus. In one embodiment, the distal balloon can be positioned within the uterus distal to the internal os, the sealing balloon can be positioned at or proximal to the internal os and extending into the cervical canal, and the positioning balloon can be positioned within the cervical canal and extending proximally into or towards the vagina.


Once the distal tip of the ablation device is disposed within the uterus, just distal to the internal os, the distal balloon can be inflated to the desired pressure. In some embodiments, the balloon can be inflated to a pressure of up to approximately 20 to 30 psi so as to prevent accidental withdrawal of the ablation device from the uterus. It should be noted that at this point, the distal balloon is positioned slightly past the internal os of the cervix. Inflation of the distal balloon can later serve as an anchor to prevent the device from sliding proximally out of the uterus.


After inflating the distal balloon, the proximal balloon can be inflated to cause the device to assume a positioned configuration, with the distal balloon fully seated against the internal os and the positioning or proximal balloon expanded within the cervix and extending past the external os into the vagina. As the proximal balloon is inflated, the balloon can expand outwardly from the cervix into the relatively unconstrained space of the vagina, which creates a compression force that pulls the device and the distal balloon proximally to engage against the interior portion of the internal os (also known as the cervical ostium or cervical os). FIG. 2 illustrates ablation device 100 inserted into the uterus of a patient with balloons 108, 110, and 112 inflated as described above.


After positioning the ablation device but prior to delivery of vapor, it can be advantageous to assess the integrity of the uterus to test that the vapor delivery tip of the device is positioned within a sealed uterus and to test that there is flow between the inflow and outflow lumens, by performing an integrity test and a patency test. The amount of fluid and rate in which it flows into the uterine cavity can provide the physician an indication of the size of the uterine cavity and whether the device is in a false passage. An integrity test can asses that the uterus is sealed, and determine leaks originating from 1) perforations to the uterine wall, or 2) leaks from inadequate sealing at the cervix or 3) leaks from the fallopian tubes.


A second test that made an assessment for patency, referred to as the device lumens patency test or patency test, could provide an indication to the physician whether the device was clogged with debris or placed within a false passage. This additional information to the physician, in conjunction with the integrity test, can provide greater assurance to the physician of device location during “blind” endometrial ablation procedures.


In clinical use, a uterine integrity and patency test could be useful for additional uterine procedures besides uterine ablation procedures such as the implantation of a device, implant, or a diagnostic or therapeutic agent. In these cases, a separate unit or module that can conduct a uterine integrity and patency test, sequentially, separately, or individually, with a separate uterine cavity introducer can be employed without a uterine ablation device or system.


In one embodiment, a uterine integrity test can contain the following elements and steps. Referring to FIGS. 1A-1B and FIG. 2, gas/fluid source 122 can be connected to pressure regulator 124 comprising either one regulator or an additional back pressure regulator. The gas/fluid source can contain a gas, such as CO2, or inert gases, or a fluid, such as saline, Ringer's Lactate, non-isotonic solutions, glycerine, and mineral oil for example. The regulator 124 can be configured to keep the pressure of the external gas source below a safety threshold value. In one embodiment, the safety threshold value can be approximately 70 mm Hg. The actual pressure amount or graduation may not be monitored and may not need to be. The fluid or gas from gas/fluid source 122 can be driven at a constant pressure bounded by the safety threshold value (e.g., can be bounded by the maximum pressure the uterus will see during treatment, such as 70 mm Hg). In addition, it can be useful to operate a uterine integrity test at a pressure equal to higher than the pressure required for conducting the endometrial ablation or other uterine procedure.


In one embodiment, gas/fluid pressure can be achieved by elevating the gas/fluid source 122 a height distance above the uterine cavity to create pressure. This height elevation can be verified by a measuring stick, tape or laser. An example of a clinically used height for a saline bag would be at least 30 inches above the patient's uterus. At this height, the pressure would be between 50 and 70 mmHg. This pressure is low enough to be below the reported opening pressure of the fallopian tubes. In addition, a pressure sensor within the uterine cavity can verify that the appropriate amount of pressure is being applied for the integrity test and patency tests. A self-adjusting feedback mechanism can be employed to raise or lower the pressure of the saline source in response to pressure measurements taken from within the uterine cavity. As an example, this feedback mechanism can raise or lower the height of the saline source in response to the pressure measurements taken from within the uterine cavity.


In some embodiments, the system can measure a flow rate of gas/fluid exiting the distal lumen of the uterine device or uterine ablation device during the uterine integrity test. This flow rate can also be used to determine the proper pressure or height of the gas/fluid source. For instance, flow rate readings can be taken while the gas/fluid source is at a certain height and the uterine device maintained within a known condition or in free space. As the height of the gas/fluid source is raised or lowered, the flow rate of the gas/fluid will respond accordingly until the gas/fluid source is placed at a height at the desired flow rate, or is pressurized to the desired amount. Likewise, the gas/fluid source can be raised or lowered by a self-adjusting feedback mechanism in response to the measured flow rate.


In some embodiments, the uterine ablation device can further include a flow meter 126 having a read out mechanism (not shown) to the end user. In one embodiment, the flow meter can comprise an ultrasound sensor, or an optical sensor configured to sense the drip rate of the gas/fluid. In some embodiments, the flow meter can be disposed near distal tip 106 of the device. In other embodiments, the flow meter can be disposed within an outflow lumen of the device. In yet another embodiment, the flow meter can be disposed external to the device but along the flow path between gas/fluid source 122 and the ablation device. The flow meter can be configured to measure and report a flow rate of fluid/gas or vapor as it moves through or exits the uterine ablation device. The read out mechanism can be numerical, graphical, or icon based. Other variations include various audio and visual signals, indicia, qualitative indicia, alarms, and color identifiers. A filter may or may not be attached to the flow meter.


Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, to perform a uterine integrity test, gas, such as CO2, or a fluid, such as saline, can be delivered from the gas/fluid source 122, through a pressure regulator, and through a flow meter 126 into the uterine ablation device 100. As shown in FIG. 3, the gas/fluid can be delivered into the uterus via both inflow lumen 129 and outflow lumen 131. In one specific embodiment, a saline such as 0.9% NaCl can be delivered into the uterus during a uterine integrity test, to determine whether there are leaks in the uterus or cervical canal through which vapor could escape during an ablation procedure. The uterine ablation device 100 can be coupled to an energy generator 124 and controller 123 for uterine ablation therapy. The vapor generator can be, for example, a vapor generator (as shown), but can also be any other type of energy generator, such as an RF energy generator, a cryotherapy generator, etc. Any type of energy modality can be used to ablate or treat the uterus after performing the integrity and patency tests described herein.


In one embodiment, a one way valve 127 as seen in FIG. 3 can be located between the flow meter 126 and the uterine ablation device 100. In other variations the one way valve 127 can be located in the handle of the uterine ablation device 100 as well as other components such as the flow meter 126 and valves 128a, 128b, and 128c. The one way valve can reduce or eliminate retrograde flow of saline during uterine contractions. The one way valve is characterized as providing low resistance to flow in one direction (towards the uterine cavity) and high resistance to flow in the retrograde direction (towards the gas/fluid source). Advantageously the one way valve can stabilize flow values because retrograde flow values are eliminated. By reducing the sinusoidal wave patterns that can be caused by uterine contractions or relaxations, movements by the patient, or inadvertent manipulations of the inflow line or the patient herself by the physician or medical staff, the procedure time is reduced. This filtering out of negative flow values isolates positive components of flow, reduces noise in flow rate values, thereby accelerating the interpretation of flow rate data and reducing procedural time.


A controller of the uterine ablation device, either integrated into the device or into the vapor generator coupled to the device, can be configured to open and close valves 128a, 128b, and 128c to allow gas or fluid to flow from source 122 into the inflow and outflow lumens 129 and 131 of the ablation device 100. Valves 128a, 128b, and 128c can be any type of valve known in the art, such as solenoid valves, inflatable balloons, air cylinders, or electric/hydraulic actuators or cams and gears. During a uterine integrity test, the controller can be configured to open valves 128a and 128b and close valve 128c, to prevent passage of gas/fluid into the waste container 133. This allows gas or fluid to flow from source 122, through flow meter 126, through one way valve 127 and valves 127a and 128b, and into inflow lumen 129 and outflow lumen 131. As the gas or fluid enters the uterus, the flow meter can measure an integrity flow rate of the gas or fluid.


In one embodiment, the controller of the uterine ablation device or the vapor generator can run an integrity test algorithm to determine if the uterus is sealed. The algorithm can analyze integrity flow rate data from the flow meter during the integrity test as gas/fluid is delivered into the uterus. Specifically, the algorithm can analyze a maximum flow rate and a minimum flow rate during an integrity test time window. The integrity test time window can be, for example, a rolling time window of a pre-selected duration. In one specific embodiment, the algorithm analyzes a maximum flow rate and a minimum flow rate continuously during a rolling 15-second integrity test time window. For each rolling integrity test time window, the minimum and maximum flow rates can be calculated. The difference between the minimum and maximum flow rates in each integrity test time window can be calculated to yield a delta flow value (maximum flow rate minus minimum flow rate), which can be used as an indicator of the stability of flow. For example, the larger the delta flow value, the less stable the flow of gas/fluid, and the smaller the delta flow value, the more stable the flow of gas/fluid. If the maximum flow rate and the delta flow value of gas or fluid stabilizes below an integrity threshold value, the controller can determine that the uterus is sealed. Importantly, the test is comprised of two algorithms that compare flow to an integrity threshold value concurrently with a second algorithm that compares the delta flow value to the integrity threshold value, and uses both of these comparisons to determine the ultimate outcome of the integrity test. The application of both of these comparisons provides greater sensitivity in the test results.


In some embodiments, this integrity flow rate delta threshold value can be approximately 5 ml/min. Therefore, in some embodiments, a uterus is considered to “pass” the uterine integrity test if both the maximum flow rate and the integrity flow rate delta threshold value are below 5 ml/min over a rolling integrity test time window. Alternatively, the test can include different thresholds for maximum flow rate and the delta flow value.


In some embodiments, the uterine integrity test can run for a pre-set time period. For example, the test can run for 60 seconds, and subsequent rolling 15-second windows can be analyzed to determine if the uterus is sealed during the 60 second time period. In another embodiment, the delta flow value can be defined as a standard deviation of the average flow that is compared to a threshold value. This delta flow value can then be compared to the threshold value to determine if the uterus is sealed.


In some embodiments, the return channel comprises a valve 128c, such as a solenoid valve, air cylinder, electric/hydraulic actuators, cams and gears or pump/inflatable balloon, which can be activated upon the start of the integrity test to close off the egress of the gas/fluid through the return channel of the uterine ablation device. When the return flow of gas/fluid through the return channel is stopped with the valve, a change of flow can be detected by the flow meter 126 on the input line. In addition to determining if there is a leak or if the device is positioned properly, the specifics of the changes in flow (e.g., how the flow reacts to closing of the return line with the valve) can provide the following the indications in some cases: a) the size of the uterine cavity; and b) the presence of a leak or lack of integrity in the system. For instance in clinical use with uteri of varying sizes, an integration under the graphical curve of flow rate versus time provides a volume assessment of the size of uterine cavity. The amount of volume can provide the physician information not only on the size of the uterus, but whether the device is improperly embedded in a false passage (smaller volume amount) or in the peritoneal cavity (larger volume amount).


Immediately after performing the integrity test above, the amount of flow in the inflow and outflow channels can be measured in a patency test and used to determine the presence of an obstruction that may affect the flow of vapor during the ablation procedure. Based on this determination or patency test, the device may be repositioned or replaced prior to delivery of vapor. For example, in one embodiment, referring to FIG. 4, a method of performing a patency test can comprise delivering gas or fluid from inflow lumen 129 of the uterine device into the uterus, also referred to as the fluid infusion tip, removing gas or fluid from the uterus with outflow lumen 131 of the uterine device, also referred to as the fluid outflow tip, and determining that the uterine device is not clogged or embedded in tissue if a flow rate of gas or fluid is observed in the flow meter of the inflow lumen of the uterine device. In FIGS. 3-4, valves 128a and 128b control the flow of gas/fluid to the uterine ablation device 100 and valve 128c control the flow of gas/fluid from the outflow lumen 131 into the outflow canister or waste container 133. Control of the valves 128a and 128b and 128c can be performed by a separate controller and software unit shown as 123.


If it has been determined that the uterus is sealed based on the integrity test performed and described in FIG. 3, the controller can also be configured to perform a patency test. In one embodiment, referring to FIG. 4, the controller can be configured to open valves 128b and 128c, but close valve 128a. This allows gas or fluid to flow from source 122, through flow meter 126, through one way valve 127 and valve 128b, and into inflow lumen 129. Gas or fluid can be removed through outflow lumen 131, through valve 128c, and into a waste container 133. As the gas or fluid enters and is removed from the uterus, the flow meter can measure a patency flow rate of the gas or fluid. If the patency flow rate is maintained above a patency flow rate threshold value, the controller can determine that the device is not clogged or embedded into tissue. In some embodiments, observing or measuring a flow of fluid or gas in outflow lumen 131 can be used to determine that the device is not clogged or embedded in tissue. A flow rate above a patency test threshold during a rolling patency test time window can indicate that the lumens are not clogged or that the distal end of the uterine ablation device is not embedded into tissue.


In one specific embodiment, the patency test threshold can be greater than 5 ml/min, and the rolling patency test time window can be a 5 second time period. Thus, the flow meter can measure the patency flow rate in rolling patency time windows (e.g., rolling 5 second periods) and the controller can analyze the measured rate. If the patency flow rate is maintained above the patency test threshold (e.g., 5 ml/min) during a rolling patency time window, then the patency test is considered passed and the test can be stopped. Passing the patency test indicates that the uterine ablation device is not obstructed or placed in false passage. If the patency test threshold is not satisfied, the physician should repeat the insertion steps and/or repeat the integrity test and patency test prior to initiating uterine ablation. When the patency flow rate is below the threshold of 5 ml/min during the rolling patency test time window, the uterine ablation device may need to be repositioned.


During the transition from the end of integrity test to the start of the patency test, the uterine cavity can be substantially filled with the gas/fluid provided during the integrity test. As described above, the closed outflow valve during the integrity test prevents gas or fluid from exiting the uterine cavity into the waste container 133. In one embodiment, it is desirable for valve 128c to be opened only partially in the range of 20-50% open for a flow rate greater than 5 ml/min and less than 40 ml/min so the uterine cavity distension achieved during the integrity test is temporarily maintained when the patency test checks for open flow through the uterine ablation device. Certain types of valves are better suited for partial opening. For example, balloon valves can be pulsed at various duty cycles to partially open the valve. The higher the duty cycle, the more quickly the valve can be opened. Partial opening of the valve prevents the uterine cavity from collapsing too quickly around the tip of the uterine ablation device which, in some instances, may cause a false positive failure of the patency test. In one embodiment, partial opening of the valve can be achieved by pulsing the opening of the valve at a specified duty cycle until flow through the vapor probe begins, or alternatively until the uterine pressure begins to drop. In another embodiment, the valve 128c can be opened rapidly just until flow through the valve begins. This rapid drop opening of the valve can be achieved by pulsing the valve initially with a high duty cycle, then shortening the pulsing (or lowering the duty cycle) as the valve approaches the range where flow through the valve begins. Once the patency flow rate increases above a threshold (or by a specific rate of increase), the valve can be maintained.


In one specific embodiment, the valve 128c can be a balloon filled to as much as 20 psig to occlude the tubing leading to waste container 133. The balloon valve can be pulsed open for up to 40 msec every 200 msec until the balloon pressure falls to as low as 5 psig. The valve opening time can then be reduced even further until the balloon pressure falls to between 3-4 psig. The valve can continue to be pulsed until flow increases to a level of 0.20 ml/min or until flow rises above the threshold value (e.g., above 5 ml/min).



FIG. 5 shows one specific embodiment where the outflow valve (e.g., valve 128c from FIG. 3) comprises an inflatable balloon. Inflating the balloon causes obstruction of the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device, and deflating the balloon allows flow out of the device and into the waste container. FIG. 5 shows the outflow valve pressure 136 (psi), the flow 138 (ml/min) through the uterine ablation device, and the uterine cavity pressure 140 (mmHg) during a typical patency test. At the completion of a typical integrity test, the cavity pressure should be above 52 mmHg, the outflow valve pressure about 20 psi, and the flow through the uterine ablation device close to zero. In the first few seconds of the patency test, the outflow valve pressure decreases rapidly, then the rate of deflation decreases to zero as flow through the device begins, shown by arrow 142. The cavity pressure drops gradually as flow increases. The patency algorithm can run concurrently with deflation of the outflow valve. In some embodiments, the deflation period of the outflow valve is typically from 3 to 40 msec.


As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of performing a patency test for a uterine ablation device, comprising: inserting the uterine ablation device into a uterus of a patient;closing an outflow valve to seal an outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device;delivering gas or fluid from an inflow lumen of the uterine ablation device into the uterus to achieve uterine cavity distension;opening the outflow valve only partially to remove gas or fluid from the uterus with the outflow lumen of the uterine ablation device while maintaining uterine cavity distension;determining a flow rate of gas or fluid in the outflow lumen while the outflow lumen is only partially opened;comparing the flow rate of gas or fluid in the outflow lumen to a threshold value; anddetermining that the uterine ablation device is not clogged or embedded in tissue if the flow rate of gas or fluid is above the threshold value.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the opening step further comprises: pulsing the outflow valve a specified duty cycle until a uterine pressure decreases.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the opening step further comprises: pulsing the outflow valve at a first duty cycle, then pulsing the outflow valve at a second duty cycle that is lower than the first duty cycle when flow of gas or fluid through the outflow lumen begins.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/002,070, filed May 22, 2014, titled “Integrity Testing Method and Apparatus for Delivering Vapor to the Uterus”, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (579)
Number Name Date Kind
408899 Small Aug 1889 A
697181 Smith Apr 1902 A
1719750 Bridge et al. Jul 1929 A
3818913 Wallach Jun 1974 A
3871374 Bolduc et al. Mar 1975 A
3880168 Berman Apr 1975 A
3924628 Droegemueller et al. Dec 1975 A
3930505 Wallach Jan 1976 A
4083077 Knight et al. Apr 1978 A
4447227 Kotsanis May 1984 A
4672962 Hershenson Jun 1987 A
4682596 Bales et al. Jul 1987 A
4748979 Hershenson Jun 1988 A
4773410 Blackmer et al. Sep 1988 A
4793352 Eichenlaub Dec 1988 A
4872920 Flynn et al. Oct 1989 A
4898574 Uchiyama et al. Feb 1990 A
4915113 Holman Apr 1990 A
4941475 Williams et al. Jul 1990 A
4950266 Sinofsky Aug 1990 A
4976711 Parins et al. Dec 1990 A
4985027 Dressel Jan 1991 A
5006119 Acker et al. Apr 1991 A
5011566 Hoffman Apr 1991 A
5045056 Behl Sep 1991 A
5078736 Behl Jan 1992 A
5084043 Hertzmann et al. Jan 1992 A
5084044 Quint Jan 1992 A
5102410 Dressel Apr 1992 A
5112328 Taboada et al. May 1992 A
5122138 Manwaring Jun 1992 A
5158536 Sekins et al. Oct 1992 A
5162374 Mulieri et al. Nov 1992 A
5190539 Fletcher et al. Mar 1993 A
5217459 Kamerling Jun 1993 A
5217465 Steppe Jun 1993 A
5242474 Herbst et al. Sep 1993 A
5246436 Rowe Sep 1993 A
5263951 Spears et al. Nov 1993 A
5277201 Stern Jan 1994 A
5277696 Hagen Jan 1994 A
5306274 Long Apr 1994 A
5318014 Carter Jun 1994 A
5331947 Shturman Jul 1994 A
5334190 Seiler Aug 1994 A
5344397 Heaven et al. Sep 1994 A
5348551 Spears et al. Sep 1994 A
5352512 Hoffman Oct 1994 A
5417686 Peterson et al. May 1995 A
5424620 Cheon et al. Jun 1995 A
5433708 Nichols et al. Jul 1995 A
5433739 Sluijter et al. Jul 1995 A
5437629 Goldrath Aug 1995 A
5443470 Stern et al. Aug 1995 A
5445168 Krebs Aug 1995 A
5449380 Chin Sep 1995 A
5451208 Goldrath Sep 1995 A
5462521 Brucker et al. Oct 1995 A
5500012 Brucker et al. Mar 1996 A
5503638 Cooper et al. Apr 1996 A
5505730 Edwards Apr 1996 A
5524620 Rosenschein Jun 1996 A
5529076 Schachar Jun 1996 A
5540658 Evans et al. Jul 1996 A
5542928 Evans et al. Aug 1996 A
5554172 Horner et al. Sep 1996 A
5562608 Sekins et al. Oct 1996 A
5562720 Stern et al. Oct 1996 A
5584872 LaFontaine et al. Dec 1996 A
5591157 Hennings et al. Jan 1997 A
5616120 Andrew et al. Apr 1997 A
5620440 Heckele et al. Apr 1997 A
5647871 Levine et al. Jul 1997 A
5653692 Masterson et al. Aug 1997 A
5662671 Barbut et al. Sep 1997 A
5665074 Kelly Sep 1997 A
5669907 Platt et al. Sep 1997 A
5674191 Edwards et al. Oct 1997 A
5681282 Eggers et al. Oct 1997 A
5683366 Eggers et al. Nov 1997 A
5688267 Panescu et al. Nov 1997 A
5695507 Auth et al. Dec 1997 A
5697281 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5697536 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5697882 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5697909 Eggers et al. Dec 1997 A
5700262 Acosta et al. Dec 1997 A
5707352 Sekins et al. Jan 1998 A
5730719 Edwards Mar 1998 A
5735811 Brisken Apr 1998 A
5741247 Rizoiu et al. Apr 1998 A
5741248 Stern et al. Apr 1998 A
5743870 Edwards Apr 1998 A
5752965 Francis et al. May 1998 A
5754717 Esch May 1998 A
5755753 Knowlton May 1998 A
5769880 Truckai et al. Jun 1998 A
5782914 Schankereli Jul 1998 A
5785521 Rizoiu et al. Jul 1998 A
5800379 Edwards Sep 1998 A
5800482 Pomeranz et al. Sep 1998 A
5800493 Stevens et al. Sep 1998 A
5810764 Eggers et al. Sep 1998 A
5820580 Edwards et al. Oct 1998 A
5824703 Clark Oct 1998 A
5827268 Laufer Oct 1998 A
5836896 Rosenschein Nov 1998 A
5836906 Edwards Nov 1998 A
5843019 Eggers et al. Dec 1998 A
5871469 Eggers et al. Feb 1999 A
5873855 Eggers et al. Feb 1999 A
5879329 Ginsburg Mar 1999 A
5885243 Capetan et al. Mar 1999 A
5888198 Eggers et al. Mar 1999 A
5891094 Masterson et al. Apr 1999 A
5891095 Eggers et al. Apr 1999 A
5891134 Goble et al. Apr 1999 A
5891457 Neuwirth Apr 1999 A
5902272 Eggers et al. May 1999 A
5911734 Tsugita et al. Jun 1999 A
5913856 Chia et al. Jun 1999 A
5938660 Swartz et al. Aug 1999 A
5944686 Patterson et al. Aug 1999 A
5944715 Goble et al. Aug 1999 A
5957919 Laufer Sep 1999 A
5964752 Stone Oct 1999 A
5968037 Rizoiu et al. Oct 1999 A
5980504 Sharkey et al. Nov 1999 A
5986662 Argiro et al. Nov 1999 A
5989212 Sussman et al. Nov 1999 A
5989249 Kirwan Nov 1999 A
5989445 Wise et al. Nov 1999 A
5997499 Sussman et al. Dec 1999 A
6004509 Dey et al. Dec 1999 A
6015406 Goble et al. Jan 2000 A
6024095 Stanley Feb 2000 A
6024733 Eggers et al. Feb 2000 A
6027501 Goble et al. Feb 2000 A
6032077 Pomeranz Feb 2000 A
6045532 Eggers et al. Apr 2000 A
6045549 Smethers et al. Apr 2000 A
6047700 Eggers et al. Apr 2000 A
6053172 Hovda et al. Apr 2000 A
6053909 Shadduck Apr 2000 A
6056746 Goble et al. May 2000 A
6057689 Saadat May 2000 A
6059011 Giolo May 2000 A
6063079 Hovda et al. May 2000 A
6063081 Mulier et al. May 2000 A
6066134 Eggers et al. May 2000 A
6066139 Ryan et al. May 2000 A
6080128 Sussman et al. Jun 2000 A
6080151 Swartz et al. Jun 2000 A
6083255 Laufer et al. Jul 2000 A
6086585 Hovda et al. Jul 2000 A
6095149 Sharkey et al. Aug 2000 A
6099251 LaFleur Aug 2000 A
6102046 Weinstein et al. Aug 2000 A
6102885 Bass Aug 2000 A
6105581 Eggers et al. Aug 2000 A
6106516 Massengill Aug 2000 A
6109268 Thapliyal et al. Aug 2000 A
6113597 Eggers et al. Sep 2000 A
6113722 Hoffman et al. Sep 2000 A
6117109 Eggers et al. Sep 2000 A
6126682 Sharkey et al. Oct 2000 A
6130671 Argiro Oct 2000 A
6139571 Fuller et al. Oct 2000 A
6149620 Baker et al. Nov 2000 A
6156036 Sussman et al. Dec 2000 A
6159160 Hsei et al. Dec 2000 A
6159194 Eggers et al. Dec 2000 A
6159207 Yoon Dec 2000 A
6159208 Hovda et al. Dec 2000 A
6162232 Shadduck Dec 2000 A
6174308 Goble et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179805 Sussman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179824 Eggers et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179836 Eggers et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183469 Thapliyal et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190381 Olsen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194066 Hoffman Feb 2001 B1
6196989 Padget et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200333 Laufer Mar 2001 B1
6203542 Ellsberry et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210402 Olsen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210404 Shadduck Apr 2001 B1
6210405 Goble et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219059 Argiro Apr 2001 B1
6224592 Eggers et al. May 2001 B1
6228078 Eggers et al. May 2001 B1
6228081 Goble May 2001 B1
6228082 Baker et al. May 2001 B1
6231567 Rizoiu et al. May 2001 B1
6235020 Cheng et al. May 2001 B1
6238391 Olsen et al. May 2001 B1
6254597 Rizoiu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6254600 Willink et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261286 Goble et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261311 Sharkey et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264650 Hovda et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264651 Underwood et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264652 Eggers et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277112 Underwood et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277114 Bullivant et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283910 Bradshaw et al. Sep 2001 B1
6283961 Underwood et al. Sep 2001 B1
6283989 Laufer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290715 Sharkey et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293942 Goble et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296636 Cheng et al. Oct 2001 B1
6296638 Davison et al. Oct 2001 B1
6299633 Laufer Oct 2001 B1
6300150 Venkatasubramanian Oct 2001 B1
6306129 Little et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306134 Goble et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309387 Eggers et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312408 Eggers et al. Nov 2001 B1
6312474 Francis et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315755 Sussman Nov 2001 B1
6319221 Savage et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322549 Eggers et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327505 Medhkour et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331171 Cohen Dec 2001 B1
6355032 Hovda et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361531 Hissong Mar 2002 B1
6363937 Hovda et al. Apr 2002 B1
6364877 Goble et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375635 Moutafis Apr 2002 B1
6379350 Sharkey et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379351 Thapliyal et al. Apr 2002 B1
6391025 Weinstein et al. May 2002 B1
6394949 Crowley et al. May 2002 B1
6394996 Lawrence et al. May 2002 B1
6398759 Sussman et al. Jun 2002 B1
6398775 Perkins et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409699 Ash Jun 2002 B1
6409723 Edwards Jun 2002 B1
6416507 Eggers et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416508 Eggers et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416509 Goble et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432103 Ellsberry et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440089 Shine Aug 2002 B1
6458231 Wapner et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461350 Underwood et al. Oct 2002 B1
6461354 Olsen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6464694 Massengill Oct 2002 B1
6464695 Hovda et al. Oct 2002 B2
6468270 Hovda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468274 Alleyne et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468313 Claeson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475215 Tanrisever Nov 2002 B1
6482201 Olsen et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488673 Laufer et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493589 Medhkour et al. Dec 2002 B1
6500173 Underwood et al. Dec 2002 B2
6508816 Shadduck Jan 2003 B2
6510854 Goble Jan 2003 B2
6517533 Swaminathan Feb 2003 B1
6522930 Schaer et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527761 Soltesz et al. Mar 2003 B1
6527766 Bair Mar 2003 B1
6540741 Underwood et al. Apr 2003 B1
6544211 Andrew et al. Apr 2003 B1
6544261 Ellsberry et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547784 Thompson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551271 Nguyen Apr 2003 B2
6551274 Heiner Apr 2003 B2
6554780 Sampson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557559 Eggers et al. May 2003 B1
6558379 Batchelor et al. May 2003 B1
6565561 Goble et al. May 2003 B1
6569146 Werner et al. May 2003 B1
6575929 Sussman et al. Jun 2003 B2
6575933 Wittenberger et al. Jun 2003 B1
6575968 Eggers et al. Jun 2003 B1
6579270 Sussman et al. Jun 2003 B2
6582423 Thapliyal et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585639 Kotmel et al. Jul 2003 B1
6588613 Pechenik et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589201 Sussman et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589237 Woloszko et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592594 Rimbaugh et al. Jul 2003 B2
6595990 Weinstein et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599311 Biggs et al. Jul 2003 B1
6602248 Sharps et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610043 Ingenito Aug 2003 B1
6620155 Underwood et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623444 Babaev Sep 2003 B2
6626855 Weng et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629974 Penny et al. Oct 2003 B2
6632193 Davison et al. Oct 2003 B1
6632220 Eggers et al. Oct 2003 B1
6634363 Danek et al. Oct 2003 B1
6653525 Ingenito et al. Nov 2003 B2
6669685 Rizoiu et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669694 Shadduck Dec 2003 B2
6676628 Sussman et al. Jan 2004 B2
6676629 Andrew et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679264 Deem et al. Jan 2004 B1
6679879 Shadduck Jan 2004 B2
6692494 Cooper et al. Feb 2004 B1
6695839 Sharkey et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699212 Kadziauskas et al. Mar 2004 B1
6699244 Carranza et al. Mar 2004 B2
6708056 Duchon et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712811 Underwood et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712812 Roschak et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719754 Underwood et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726684 Woloszko et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726708 Lasheras Apr 2004 B2
6746447 Davison et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749604 Eggers et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755794 Soukup Jun 2004 B2
6758846 Goble et al. Jul 2004 B2
6763836 Tasto et al. Jul 2004 B2
6766202 Underwood et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770070 Balbierz Aug 2004 B1
6770071 Woloszko et al. Aug 2004 B2
6772012 Ricart et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773431 Eggers et al. Aug 2004 B2
6776765 Soukup et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780180 Goble et al. Aug 2004 B1
6805130 Tasto et al. Oct 2004 B2
6813520 Truckai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832996 Woloszko et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837884 Woloszko Jan 2005 B2
6837887 Woloszko et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837888 Ciarrocca et al. Jan 2005 B2
6852108 Barry et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860847 Alferness et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875194 MacKool Apr 2005 B2
6896672 Eggers et al. May 2005 B1
6896674 Woioszko et al. May 2005 B1
6896675 Leung et al. May 2005 B2
6896690 Lambrecht et al. May 2005 B1
6901927 Deem et al. Jun 2005 B2
6904909 Andreas et al. Jun 2005 B2
6907881 Suki et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911028 Shadduck Jun 2005 B2
6915806 Pacek et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918903 Bass Jul 2005 B2
6921385 Clements et al. Jul 2005 B2
6929640 Underwood et al. Aug 2005 B1
6929642 Xiao et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949096 Davison et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955675 Jain Oct 2005 B2
6960204 Eggers et al. Nov 2005 B2
6962584 Stone et al. Nov 2005 B1
6972014 Eum et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978174 Gelfand et al. Dec 2005 B2
6986769 Nelson et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991028 Comeaux et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991631 Woloszko et al. Jan 2006 B2
7004940 Ryan et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004941 Tvinnereim et al. Feb 2006 B2
7022088 Keast et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031504 Argiro et al. Apr 2006 B1
7070596 Woloszko et al. Jul 2006 B1
7083612 Littrup et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094215 Davison et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094249 Broome et al. Aug 2006 B1
7101367 Xiao et al. Sep 2006 B2
7104986 Hovda et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105007 Hibler Sep 2006 B2
RE39358 Goble Oct 2006 E
7128748 Mooradian et al. Oct 2006 B2
7131969 Hovda et al. Nov 2006 B1
7136064 Zuiderveld Nov 2006 B2
7144402 Kuester Dec 2006 B2
7144588 Oray et al. Dec 2006 B2
7162303 Levin et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169143 Eggers et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179255 Lettice et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186234 Dahla et al. Mar 2007 B2
7192400 Campbell et al. Mar 2007 B2
7192428 Eggers et al. Mar 2007 B2
7201750 Eggers et al. Apr 2007 B1
7217268 Eggers et al. May 2007 B2
7233820 Gilboa Jun 2007 B2
7235070 Vanney Jun 2007 B2
7241293 Davison Jul 2007 B2
7270658 Woloszko et al. Sep 2007 B2
7270659 Ricart et al. Sep 2007 B2
7270661 Dahla et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276063 Davison et al. Oct 2007 B2
7297143 Woloszko et al. Nov 2007 B2
7297145 Woloszko et al. Nov 2007 B2
7311708 McClurken Dec 2007 B2
7320325 Duchon et al. Jan 2008 B2
7335195 Mehier Feb 2008 B2
7347859 Garabedian et al. Mar 2008 B2
7524315 Blott et al. Apr 2009 B2
7585295 Ben-Nun Sep 2009 B2
7617005 Demarais et al. Nov 2009 B2
7620451 Demarais et al. Nov 2009 B2
7653438 Deem et al. Jan 2010 B2
7756583 Demarais et al. Jul 2010 B2
7815616 Boehringer et al. Oct 2010 B2
7815646 Hart Oct 2010 B2
7853333 Demarais Dec 2010 B2
7873417 Demarais et al. Jan 2011 B2
7937143 Demarais et al. May 2011 B2
7993323 Barry et al. Aug 2011 B2
8131371 Demarals et al. Mar 2012 B2
8145316 Deem et al. Mar 2012 B2
8145317 Demarais et al. Mar 2012 B2
8150519 Demarais et al. Apr 2012 B2
8150520 Demarais et al. Apr 2012 B2
8175711 Demarais et al. May 2012 B2
8192424 Woloszko Jun 2012 B2
8197470 Sharkey et al. Jun 2012 B2
8216217 Sharkey et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221401 Sharkey et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221403 Sharkey et al. Jul 2012 B2
8313485 Shadduck Nov 2012 B2
8574226 Shadduck Nov 2013 B2
8579888 Hoey et al. Nov 2013 B2
8579892 Hoey et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585645 Barry et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585692 Shadduck et al. Nov 2013 B2
8801702 Hoey et al. Aug 2014 B2
8900223 Shadduck Dec 2014 B2
9662060 Peliks May 2017 B2
9907599 Hoey et al. Mar 2018 B2
20020007180 Wittenberger et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013601 Nobles et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019627 Maguire et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020077516 Flanigan Jun 2002 A1
20020078956 Sharpe et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020111386 Sekins et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128638 Chauvet et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133147 Marchitto et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020151917 Barry Oct 2002 A1
20020161326 Sussman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020173815 Hogendijk et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177846 Muller et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030028189 Woloszko et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030097126 Woloszko et al. May 2003 A1
20030099279 Venkatasubramanian et al. May 2003 A1
20030130738 Hovda et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144654 Hilal Jul 2003 A1
20030158545 Hovda et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163178 Davison et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181922 Alferness Sep 2003 A1
20030212394 Pearson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030217962 Childers et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220604 Al-Anazi Nov 2003 A1
20030225364 Kraft et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002698 Xiao et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024399 Sharps et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040047855 Ingenito Mar 2004 A1
20040049180 Sharps et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055606 Hendricksen et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068306 Shadduck Apr 2004 A1
20040116922 Hovda et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040199226 Shadduck Oct 2004 A1
20040230190 Dahla et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050010205 Hovda et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050119650 Sanders et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143728 Sampson et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166925 Wilson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171574 Rubinsky et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171582 Matlock Aug 2005 A1
20050177147 Vancelette et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050215991 Altman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222485 Shaw et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050228423 Khashayar et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050228424 Khashayar et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240171 Forrest Oct 2005 A1
20050267467 Paul et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283143 Rizoiu Dec 2005 A1
20060004400 McGurk et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060047291 Barry Mar 2006 A1
20060058831 Atad Mar 2006 A1
20060085054 Zikorus et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100619 McClurken et al. May 2006 A1
20060130830 Barry Jun 2006 A1
20060135955 Shadduck Jun 2006 A1
20060142783 Lewis et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060161233 Barry et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060200076 Gonzalez et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206150 Demarais et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224154 Shadduck et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060265053 Hunt Nov 2006 A1
20060271111 Demarais et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070021713 Kumar et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032785 Diederich et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070129720 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129760 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070129761 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135875 Demarais et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070225744 Nobles et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070239197 Dubey et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070288051 Beyer et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080033493 Deckman et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080077201 Levinson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080125747 Prokop May 2008 A1
20080132826 Shadduck et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080135053 Gruber et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161788 Dando et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167664 Payne et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080249467 Burnett et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090024108 Lee-Sepsick et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030412 Willis et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090076409 Wu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090125010 Sharkey et al. May 2009 A1
20090216220 Hoey et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090306640 Glaze et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100078046 Labib et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100082021 Gutierrez et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100094270 Sharma Apr 2010 A1
20100100091 Truckai Apr 2010 A1
20100100094 Truckai Apr 2010 A1
20100106152 Truckai et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100114083 Sharma May 2010 A1
20100114089 Truckai et al. May 2010 A1
20100168731 Wu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168739 Wu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100174282 Demarais et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179528 Shadduck et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100204688 Hoey et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100228222 Williams et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249773 Clark et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100262133 Hoey et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110009829 Kosinski et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110054508 Zhou Mar 2011 A1
20110077628 Hoey et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110112432 Toth May 2011 A1
20110112433 Toth May 2011 A1
20110112523 Toth et al. May 2011 A1
20110118718 Toth et al. May 2011 A1
20110118719 Vissy et al. May 2011 A1
20110160648 Hoey Jun 2011 A1
20110166499 Demarais et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110178570 Demarais Jul 2011 A1
20110200171 Beetel et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110208096 Demarais et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110208178 Truckai Aug 2011 A1
20110257564 Demarais et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264011 Wu et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264075 Leung et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110264090 Shadduck et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120065632 Shadduck Mar 2012 A1
20120101413 Beetel et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120101538 Ballakur et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120116382 Ku et al. May 2012 A1
20120116383 Mauch et al. May 2012 A1
20120116486 Naga et al. May 2012 A1
20120130359 Turovskiy May 2012 A1
20120130360 Buckley et al. May 2012 A1
20120130458 Ryba et al. May 2012 A1
20120136343 Burnett May 2012 A1
20120136344 Buckley et al. May 2012 A1
20120136350 Goshgarian et al. May 2012 A1
20120136417 Buckley et al. May 2012 A1
20120136418 Buckley et al. May 2012 A1
20120143293 Mauch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150267 Buckley et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158104 Huynh et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120184949 Gurskis et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197198 Demarais et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197245 Burnett et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120209281 Truckai Aug 2012 A1
20120232545 Truckai et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120245583 Truckai et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120259271 Shadduck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120283717 Sharkey et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130006231 Sharma et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130090572 Peliks et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130116683 Shadduck et al. May 2013 A1
20130237978 Shadduck et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130296837 Burnett et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140200570 Hoey et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150025515 Hoey et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150119795 Germain et al. Apr 2015 A1
20170258511 Peliks et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170354452 Gurskis et al. Dec 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
201189204 Feb 2009 CN
201379631 Jan 2010 CN
H06-285074 Oct 1994 JP
2000502585 Mar 2000 JP
20003513742 Apr 2003 JP
2010516351 May 2010 JP
WO 9953853 Oct 1999 WO
WO00011927 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0029055 May 2000 WO
WO 0185012 Nov 2001 WO
WO 02069821 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03070302 Aug 2003 WO
WO2005025635 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005102175 Nov 2005 WO
WO2006003665 Jan 2006 WO
WO 2006055695 May 2006 WO
WO06108974 Oct 2006 WO
WO2009009398 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2010045055 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010048007 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2011025658 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011053599 May 2011 WO
WO 2011060189 May 2011 WO
WO 2011060191 May 2011 WO
WO 2012106260 Aug 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
Van De Velde; Vapo-cauterization of the uterus; Amer. J. Med. Sci.; vol. CXVIII (118); Nov. 1899.
Blacker; Vaporization of the uterus; J. Obstet. & Gyn.; vol. 1; Issue 5; pp. 488-511; May 1902.
Neuwirth et al.; The endometrial ablator: a new instrument; Obst. & Gyn.; vol. 83; No. 5; part 1; pp. 792-796; May 1994.
Prior et al.; Treatment of mennorrhagia by radiofrequency heating; Int. J. Hyperthermia; vol. 7; No. 2; pp. 213-220; Mar-Apr. 1991.
Baker et al.; Threshold intrauterine perfusion pressures for intraperitoneal spill during hydrotubation and correlation with tubal adhesive diseases; Fertility and Sterility; 64(6); pp. 1066-1069; Dec. 31, 1995.
Hoey et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/918,962 entitled “Medical system and method of use,” filed Mar. 12, 2018.
Fishman et. al.; A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema; N Engl J Med; 348(210. pp. 2059-2073; May 22, 2003.
Homasson et. al.; Bronchoscopic cryotherapy for airway strictures caused by tumors; Chest; 90(2); pp. 159-164; Aug. 1, 1986.
Marasso et al.; Radiofrequency resection of bronchial tumours in combination with cryotherapy: evaluation of a new technique; Thorax; 53(2); pp. 106-109; Feb. 1998.
Marasso et. al.; Cryosurgery in bronchoscopic treatment of tracheobronchial stenosis; Cheat; 103(2); pp. 472-474; Feb. 1993.
Morice et. al; Endobronchial argon plasma coagulation for treatment of hemoptysis and neoplastic airway obstruction; Chest; 119(3); pp. 781-787; Mar. 1, 2001.
Tschirren et. al.; Intrathoracic airway trees: segmentation and airway morphology analysis from low-dose CT scans; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; 24(12); pp. 1529-1539; Dec. 2005.
Unger et. al.; Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography; Science, 288(5463); pp. 113-116; Apr. 7, 2000.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150335373 A1 Nov 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62002070 May 2014 US