This disclosure relates generally to circuit interruption techniques to protect electrical circuits from fault conditions such as arc-fault conditions.
In general, electrical circuit interrupters are components that are utilized in electrical distribution systems with a given building or home structure to protect branch circuit conductors and electrical loads from being exposed to, e.g., current overload conditions and fault conditions. A current overload condition is defined as operation of equipment in excess of its normal, full-load rating, or a branch circuit in excess of its ampacity which, when the overload persists for a sufficient period of time, would cause damage or dangerous overheating. Fault conditions comprise unintended or accidental load conditions that typically produce much higher over-current conditions than do overloads, depending on the impedance of the fault. A fault producing the maximum over-current condition is referred to as a short-circuit or a “bolted fault.”
There are various types of electrical circuit interrupter devices including, but not limited to, arc-fault circuit interrupter (AFCI) devices. AFCI devices are designed to prevent electrical fires that can be caused by potentially dangerous arc-faults in electrical circuits. An arc-fault is an unintentional electrical arcing condition that occurs in an electrical circuit. Arcing can create high intensity heat that ignites surrounding material and causes a fire. An AFCI device is configured to detect an arcing condition in an electrical circuit and break the electric circuit to stop the arcing. An AFCI device is designed to distinguish between harmless electrical arcs that are generated as a result of normal operation of electrical devices (e.g., opening/closing of a contact or switch, operating a motor with brushes, operating household appliances such air conditioners, refrigerators, tools, etc.) and potentially dangerous electrical arcs that are caused by, e.g., damaged wire insulation, loose connections that cause arcing between the connections, broken conductors in electrical cords, etc., which can cause a series arc fault or a parallel arc fault.
By way of specific example, power receptacles (e.g., outlets) with worn contacts are a common cause of electrical arcing which can lead to electrical fires. Over time, the contact springs of a power receptacle become worn with the repeated insertion of electrical plugs, which causes the contact springs to lose tension and degrade the connection between the receptacle contacts and the terminals of the electrical plugs. This degradation in contact connection results in the generation of electrical arcs within the power receptacle which, over time, cause pitting, melting and spattering of the receptacle contacts, which can trigger dangerous electrical fires.
Conventional circuit breakers are typically configured to protect against current overload and short-circuit conditions, and do not protect against electrical arcing conditions that produce erratic, and often reduced current. In fact, arc-fault conditions in a branch circuit typically result in reduced current and voltages, which are not characteristic or indicative of short-circuit or overload conditions for which conventional circuit breakers are designed to protect against. For example, the RMS current value for a parallel arc-fault will be considerably less than the RMS current value of a bolted short-circuit fault. Therefore, a conventional typical 15-amp circuit breaker with no AFCI protection will not be able to clear the arc-fault before a fire is potentially ignited.
Embodiments of the disclosure include circuit interrupter devices and methods to protect electrical circuits from fault conditions such as arc-fault conditions. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, a circuit interrupter device comprises a line hot terminal, a line neutral terminal, a load hot terminal, a load neutral terminal, a solid-state switch, internal short-circuit switch circuitry, and control circuitry. The solid-state switch is serially connected in an electrical path between the line hot terminal and the load hot terminal. The internal short-circuit switch circuitry comprises an internal short-circuit switch and a shunt resistor serially connected between a first node and a second node, wherein the first node is coupled to the line hot terminal and the second node is coupled to the line neutral terminal. The control circuitry is coupled to the solid-state switch and the internal short-circuit switch circuitry. The control circuitry is configured to detect for an occurrence of a fault condition and drive the solid-state switch into a switched-off state in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition. The control circuitry is further configured to activate the internal short-circuit switch in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition to thereby generate an internal short-circuit path between the first node and the second node and allow short-circuit current to flow through the shunt resistor between the line hot terminal and the line neutral terminal of the circuit interrupter device.
Another exemplary embodiment includes a system which comprise a circuit breaker and a circuit interrupter device. The circuit breaker comprises a line input terminal and a load output terminal, wherein the line input terminal of the circuit breaker is coupled to an alternating current (AC) power source. The circuit interrupter device is coupled to the load output terminal of the circuit breaker. The circuit interrupter device comprises a line hot terminal, a line neutral terminal, a load hot terminal, a load neutral terminal, a solid-state switch, internal short-circuit switch circuitry, and control circuitry. The solid-state switch is serially connected in an electrical path between the line hot terminal and the load hot terminal. The internal short-circuit switch circuitry comprises an internal short-circuit switch and a shunt resistor serially connected between a first node and a second node, wherein the first node is coupled to the line hot terminal and the second node is coupled to the line neutral terminal. The control circuitry is coupled to the solid-state switch and the internal short-circuit switch circuitry. The control circuitry is configured to detect for an occurrence of a fault condition and drive the solid-state switch into a switched-off state in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition. The control circuit is further configured to activate the internal short-circuit switch in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition to thereby generate an internal short-circuit path between the first node and the second node and allow short-circuit current to flow through the shunt resistor between the line hot terminal and the line neutral terminal of the circuit interrupter device, wherein the flow of short-circuit current between the line hot terminal and the line neutral terminal of the circuit interrupter device is sufficient to trip the circuit breaker.
Another exemplary embodiment includes a method that is implemented by a circuit interrupter device. The method comprises detecting an occurrence of a fault condition on a branch circuit that is protected by a circuit breaker, and interrupting a flow of load current on the branch circuit, in response to detecting the occurrence of the fault condition. The method further comprises generating a short-circuit path to allow a short-circuit current to flow through a shunt resistor within the circuit interrupter device, in response to detecting the occurrence of the fault condition, wherein the flow of the short-circuit current within the circuit interrupter device causes the circuit breaker to trip and disconnect an AC power source from the branch circuit.
Other embodiments will be described in the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
Embodiments of the disclosure will now be described in further detail with regard to circuit interrupter devices and methods to protect electrical circuits from fault conditions such as arc-fault conditions. The term “exemplary” as used herein means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration”. Any embodiment or design described herein as “exemplary” is not to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs.
In some embodiments such as shown in
As further illustrated in
In some embodiments, the circuit breaker 15 is configured to “trip” in response to over-current and short-circuit fault conditions. As noted above, an over-current condition occurs when equipment is operated in excess of its normal, full-load rating, or a branch circuit in excess of its ampacity which, when the over-current condition persists for a sufficient period of time, would cause damage or dangerous over-heating. A short-circuit fault condition comprises an unintended or accidental load condition that produces a much higher current overload than an over-current condition, depending on the impedance of the fault. As noted above, a fault producing the maximum over-current condition is referred to as a short-circuit or a “bolted fault.” In some embodiments, the circuit breaker 15 is not an AFCI protection device.
In some embodiments, the circuit breaker 15 comprises an electromechanical circuit breaker which comprises elements such as a mechanical AC switch (e.g., air-gap switch), a mechanical actuator mechanism, an electromagnetic actuator element (e.g., a solenoid), a thermal actuator element (e.g., bimetallic element), and a manual switch. In some embodiments, the mechanical air-gap switch comprises first and second contacts which are physically closed or separated by operation of the mechanical actuator mechanism (e.g., latch mechanism with spring element). In particular, the mechanical actuator mechanism is configured to physically close the first and second contacts together in response to manual actuation of the manual switch to an “On” position and thereby allow current to flow in an electrical path between the line input terminal 15A and load output terminal 15B of the circuit breaker 15. In addition, the mechanical actuator mechanism is configured to physically separate the first and second contacts of the mechanical AC switch (i.e., trip the circuit breaker 15) either manually in response to a manual actuation of the manual switch to an “Off” position, or automatically in response to the occurrence of short-circuit condition or prolonged over-current condition. When the circuit breaker 15 is manually or automatically tripped, an air-gap is created between the first and second contacts of the mechanical AC switch.
In particular, the electromagnetic actuator element (e.g., solenoid) is configured to be magnetically actuated in response to large surges in current generated by e.g., short-circuit events, wherein actuation of the electromagnetic element causes mechanical actuation of the actuator mechanism to separate the first and second contacts of the AC switch and thereby trip the circuit breaker 15. In addition, the thermal actuator element (e.g., bimetallic element) is configured to be thermally actuated in response to a prolonged excess over-current condition, wherein actuation of the thermal actuator element causes mechanical actuation of the actuator mechanism to separate the first and second contacts of the AC switch and thereby trip the circuit breaker 15. In this regard, the electromagnetic element of the circuit breaker 15 responds instantaneously to large surges in current (short-circuits) while the thermal actuator element responds to less extreme but longer-term over-current conditions. Once tripped, the circuit breaker 15 must be manually reset using the manual switch (e.g., toggle the manual switch to the “Off” position and then to the “On” position).
In some embodiments, the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 comprises a solid-state switch 101/102 which is serially connected in an electrical path between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C, control circuitry 110, and internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120. The internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 comprises an internal short-circuit switch 121/122 and a short-circuit current limiting resistor R4 (alternatively referred to herein as shunt resistor R4) serially connected between a first node N1 and a second node N2. The first node N1 is coupled to the line hot terminal 100A, and the second node N2 is coupled to the line neutral terminal 100B. The control circuitry 110 is coupled to the solid-state switch 101/102 and to the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120. As explained in further detail below, the control circuitry 110 is configured to (i) detect for an occurrence of a fault condition, (ii) drive the solid-state switch 101/102 into a switched-off state in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition, and (iii) activate the internal short-circuit switch 121/122 in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition to thereby generate an internal short-circuit path between the first node N1 and the second node N2 and allow short-circuit current to flow through the shunt resistor R4 between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the circuit interrupter device 100 to thereby cause the circuit breaker 15 to trip and disconnect the AC mains 10 from the branch circuit.
The solid-state switch 101/102 comprises a first switch 101 and a second switch 102 which form a bidirectional solid-state switch. In some embodiments, a current sensor 105 is serially connected between the first and second switches 101 and 102. In some embodiments, the first and second switches 101 and 102 each comprise a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) switch (e.g., power MOSFET switches). In some embodiments, the first and second switches 101 and 102 comprise N-type enhancement MOSFET devices. The first and second switches 101 and 102 are serially connected back-to-back, and have source (S) terminals that are coupled through the current sensor 105, and commonly connected gate (G) terminals which are connected to the control circuitry 110. The first switch 101 comprises a drain terminal which is coupled to the line hot terminal 100A, and the second switch 102 comprises a drain terminal which is coupled to the load hot terminal 100C.
As further shown in
The solid-state switch 101/102 is configured to (i) allow the bidirectional flow of load current between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 when the solid-state switch 101/102 is in switched-on state and (ii) block the bidirectional flow of load current between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 when the solid-state switch 101/102 is in switched-off state.
The control circuitry 110 comprises the current sensor 105 and one or more integrated circuits blocks which implement circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111, switch control circuitry 112, current limit detection circuitry 113, a digital signal processor 114, a power measurement microprocessor 115, AC-to-DC converter circuitry 116, voltage sensor circuitry 117, and wireless control circuitry 118, the functions of which will be explained in further detail below. As noted above, the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 comprises the internal short-circuit switch 121/122 and the shunt resistor R4 serially connected between the first node N1 and the second node N2. As further shown in
In some embodiments, the internal short-circuit switch 121/122 comprises a bidirectional solid-state switch comprising a first MOSFET switch 121 and a second MOSFET switch 122, which comprise intrinsic body diodes 121-1 and 122-1, respectively. The first and second MOSFET switches 121 and 122 comprise gate (G) terminals that are commonly coupled to a third node N3, and source (S) terminals that are commonly coupled to a fourth node N4, wherein the fourth node N4 comprises a virtual ground node of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120. The gate (G) terminals of the first and second MOSFET switches 121 and 122 are connected to the switch biasing circuitry 123 through the third node N3. The first MOSFET switch 121 comprises a drain (D) terminal that is coupled to the first node N1, and the second MOSFET switch 122 comprises a drain (D) terminal that is coupled to the second node N2 through the shunt resistor R4. In some embodiments such as shown in
As further shown in
Moreover, the switch biasing circuitry 123 comprises a self-biasing circuit that is configured to generate a regulated direct current (DC) voltage using current drawn from an AC power source applied to the line hot and line neutral terminals 100A and 100B of the circuit interrupter device 100, and to apply the regulated DC voltage to the gate terminals of the first and second MOSFET switches 121 and 122 of the internal short-circuit switch through the resistor R3. The self-biasing circuit comprises a voltage clamping circuit that is configured to generate the regulated DC voltage, wherein the voltage clamping circuit comprises the capacitor C1 and the Zener diode ZD, which are connected in parallel between a fifth node N5 and the fourth node N4. In addition, the self-biasing circuit comprises the first resistor R1 and the first diode D1 serially connected between the first node N1 and the fifth node N5, and the second resistor R2 and the second diode D2 serially connected between the second node N2 and the fifth node N5. The operation of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 will be discussed in further detail below.
In some embodiments, the control circuitry 110 controls the activation and deactivation of the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 by operation of the switch control circuitry 112. In some embodiments, the switch control circuitry 112 is configured to generate a gate control signal that is applied to the gate terminals of the first and second MOSFET switches 101 and 102 to place the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 into a switched-on state or a switched-off state. In particular, during normal operation of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, the switch control circuitry 112 applies a gate control signal to the gate terminals of the first and second MOSFET switches 101 and 102 to place the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 in a switched-on state, which allows the bidirectional flow of AC load current between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100.
On the other hand, when a given circuit block of the control circuitry 110 detects an occurrence of a fault condition or abnormal operating condition (e.g., series arcing, parallel arcing, short-circuit condition, over-current condition, ground-fault condition, abnormal load power profile, etc.), the control circuitry 110 will generate a fault detection control signal. In response to the fault detection control signal, the switch control circuitry 112 applies a gate control signal to the gate terminals of the first and second MOSFET switches 101 and 102 to place the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 into a switched-off state to thereby interrupt (i.e., block) the bidirectional flow of AC load current between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 and, thus, interrupt the flow of load current to the load 20.
The control circuitry 110 is configured to monitor voltages (e.g., VL, VN, etc.) at various nodes within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, as well as monitor load current which flows in the electrical path through the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C, and utilize the monitored current and voltages to perform functions such as measuring power usage and profiles of the load, detecting fault conditions, etc. For example, the load current sensor 105 is configured to sense the flow of load current in the hot line path between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. The load current sensor 105 can be implemented using any suitable type of current sensing element including, but not limited to, a current-sensing resistor, a current amplifier, a Hall Effect current sensor, etc.
The output of the load current sensor 105 is input to various circuit blocks of the control circuitry 110 to detect for the occurrence of fault conditions and to detect for abnormal power profiles of the load 20 based, at least in part on, the magnitude and/or the AC waveform characteristics of the detected load current. The output of the current sensor 105 will vary depending on the type of current sensor 105 that is implemented. For example, in some embodiments, the output of the current sensor 105 can be a voltage which is generated across a sense resistor as a result of load current flowing through the sense resistor. In some embodiments, the output for the current sensor 105 can be a fault detection signal which is generated in response to the current sensor 105 detecting an over-current condition, etc. In other embodiments, a second current sensor can be implemented to sense the flow of load current in a neutral line path between the line neutral terminal 100B and the load neutral terminal 100D of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100.
The voltage sensor circuitry 117 is configured to sense the voltage level at different nodes within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. For example, in the exemplary embodiment of
The voltage sensor circuitry 117 can be implemented using any suitable type of voltage sensing circuitry including, but not limited to, zero-crossing detector circuits. A zero-crossing detector is configured to receive as input an AC waveform, compare the input AC waveform to a zero-reference voltage (e.g., line neutral voltage), and detect the AC waveform transition from positive and negative, which coincides when the AC waveform crosses the zero-reference voltage. In some embodiments, the zero-crossing detector circuitry is configured to generate a square wave output which transitions between a logic “1” and logic “0” output upon each zero-crossing detection of the AC voltage waveform. In other embodiments, the zero-crossing detector circuitry is configured to generate a short-lived pulse (˜3 us) having an RC-adjustable duration. In some embodiments, the voltage sensor circuitry 117 comprises voltage divider circuitry which is configured to divide the sensed voltages VL, VN, etc., down to a lower voltage level and output voltages which are a fraction of the voltage levels of the input voltages VL, VN, etc., wherein the lower voltage levels are input to various circuit blocks (e.g., the digital signal processor 114, the power measurement microprocessor 115, etc.) of the control circuitry 110 to perform fault detection and power measurement functions.
The current limit detection circuitry 113 is configured to detect fault conditions such as over-current and short-circuit conditions based on the magnitude (e.g., RMS value, peak current, etc.) of the AC current waveform that is detected by the current sensor 105. For example, in some embodiments, the current sensor 105 comprises a sense resistor that generates a “sense voltage” based on an amount of load current flowing through the sense resistor, and the current limit detection circuitry 113 is configured to measure the sense voltage and determine if the sense voltage exceeds a pre-determined value which is indicative of a short-circuit fault condition. In response to detecting a fault condition, the current limit detection circuitry 113 outputs a fault detection control signal to the switch control circuitry 112, which causes the switch control circuitry 112 to deactivate the first and second MOSFET switches 101 and 102.
The power measurement microprocessor 115 is configured to utilize the sensed current and voltages (e.g., outputs of the current sensor 105 and voltage sensor circuitry 117) to determine the amount of power delivered to the load 20. In some embodiments, the power measurement microprocessor 115 comprises an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) which is specifically designed to measure power and energy in a power line system and process instantaneous voltage and current waveforms to compute RMS values of voltage and currents, active, reactive and apparent power and energies. In other embodiments, the power measurement microprocessor 115 comprises an “off-the-shelf” application-specific standard product (ASSP) chip that implements the desired power measurement functionalities.
In some embodiments, the power measurement microprocessor 115 is configured to measure power usage of the load 20 and maintain such power usage information over time for historical analysis. In some embodiments, the power measurement microprocessor 115 is configured to detect for abnormal load power usage or abnormal power profiles. For example, the power measurement microprocessor 115 can be configured to detect power profiles that are indicative of high resistance connections (known as glowing connections) which can cause fires, and other abnormal power profiles associated with, e.g., high line voltages or low line voltages, etc. In response to detecting the existence of an abnormal load power usage or abnormal power profiles, the power measurement microprocessor 115 can be configured to output a fault detection control signal to the switch control circuitry 112, which causes the switch control circuitry 112 to deactivate the first and second MOSFET switches 101 and 102.
In some embodiments, the digital signal processor 114 is configured to detect for the occurrence of arc-fault conditions. More specifically, in some embodiments, the digital signal processor 114 is configured as an arc signal analyzer which digitally samples the sensed voltage waveforms and/or sensed current waveforms to identify certain characteristics in the sampled voltage and current waveforms which are indicative of arcing waveforms. For instance, the digital signal processor 114 can be configured to sample the sensed voltage and/or current waveforms in small increments (e.g., microseconds) and compare the characteristics of the sampled waveforms to known characteristics of arcing waveforms to determine if an arcing condition exists, wherein certain abnormal characteristics in the amplitude or time period of the sampled waveforms are indicative of arcing conditions. In particular, decreased voltage, decreased current, changes in expected zero-voltage crossing timing, loss of zero-voltage crossing, etc., are conditions that can be indicative of arcing conditions. In some embodiments, if multiple features indicative of an arcing condition exist in two or more cycles of the AC mains 10, the digital signal processor 114 can determine that an arcing condition exists.
For example,
When an arc-fault occurs, the exemplary AC voltage waveform 200 in
In some embodiments, the digital signal processor 114 can digitally sample a sensed AC voltage waveform every microsecond, which provides 1000 samples per each millisecond of the sampled AC waveform. For an exemplary AC voltage waveform 200 as shown in
In response to detecting the existence of an arcing condition, the digital signal processor 114 will output a fault detection control signal to the switch control circuitry 112, which causes the switch control circuitry 112 to deactivate the first and second MOSFET switches 101 and 102. In addition, as explained in further detail below, in response to detecting an arcing condition, the digital signal processor 114 will output the fault detection control signal to the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111, which causes the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111 to activate an internal short-circuit switch (e.g., the bidirectional solid-state switch 121/122) within the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120. The activation of the internal short-circuit switch causes an internal short-circuit path to be created between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 with a controlled amount of short-circuit current flowing through the shunt resistor R4 that is serially coupled between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B. The flow of the internal short-circuit current within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 causes the circuit breaker 15 to trip and disconnect AC power from the branch circuit.
The AC-to-DC converter circuitry 116 is configured to provide DC supply power to the circuit blocks 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, and 118 of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. In some embodiments, the AC-to-DC converter circuitry 116 is connected between the hot line (e.g., VL) and the neutral line (e.g., VN) and is configured to convert the AC power delivered by the AC mains 10 to a regulated DC supply voltage that is used to power the various circuit blocks of the control circuitry 110. In some embodiments, the AC-to-DC converter circuitry 116 comprises sufficient storage capacitance to power the control circuitry 110 immediately following a utility outage such that relevant power outage or short-circuit information may be obtained and stored as the utility power collapses, and then wirelessly transmitted to a remote node, device, or system using the wireless control circuitry 118. The AC-to-DC converter circuitry 116 may also include sufficient capacitance to maintain sufficient DC power the control circuitry 110 during a load short-circuit event, to thereby allow the control circuitry 110 to properly operate and deactivate the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 and interrupt power to the load 20.
In some embodiments, the wireless control circuitry 118 comprises a radio frequency (RF) transceiver to wirelessly communicate with a remote node, device, system, etc., to support remote monitoring of energy utilization and detection of fault conditions. In addition, the wireless control circuitry 118 is configured to enable wireless communication with the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 to allow a technician, electrician, or a remote compute node, for example, to remotely control the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 using predetermined commands. The wireless control circuitry 118 can implement any suitable wireless communication protocol such as Wi-Fi or WiMAX, Bluetooth, etc.
As noted above, the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 is configured to generate an internal short-circuit path between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 in response to the detection of a fault condition such as an short-circuit condition, arc-fault condition, etc. When a fault condition is detected by a given circuit block of the control circuitry 110, the switch control circuitry 112 places the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 into a switched-off state, and the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111 activates the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 to generate a controlled short-circuit current within the intelligent circuit interrupter 100 to thereby cause the circuit breaker 15 to trip. The internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 is configured to generate a limited/controlled internal short-circuit current which flows between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 through the shunt resistor R4 to effectively trip and shut off the circuit breaker 15.
While the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 can be deactivated in response to the detection of an arc-fault condition to prevent current flow to the load 20, the deactivation of the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 will not protect against an arc-fault condition which occurs on the line side or otherwise upstream of the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, and such upstream arc-fault condition may persist when the circuit breaker 15 does not implement arc-fault circuit interrupter functionality. In this regard, it is to be appreciated that the implementation of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 advantageously provides a cost-effective solution to provide AFCI protection for the entire branch circuit connected to the circuit breaker 15, despite the circuit breaker 15 not having AFCI functionality.
As shown in
As noted above, the switch biasing circuitry 123 comprises a self-biasing circuit which is configured to generate a regulated DC voltage on node N5, which is used to drive the gate (G) terminals of the first and second switches 121 and 122 and turn on the first and second switches, when the actuation switch 124 is turned-off. When the actuation switch 124 is turned on, the gate (G) and source (S) terminals of the first and second switches 121 and 122 are effectively shunted/shorted (e.g., VGS is approximately 0V), which results in maintaining the first and second switches 121 and 122 of the bidirectional solid-state switch 121/122 in a switched-off state. On the other hand, when the actuation switch 124 is turned-off, the self-generated, regulated DC voltage at node N5 is applied to the commonly connected gate (G) terminals of the first and second switches 121 and 122, which causes the first and second switches 121 and 122 to turn on and thereby generate an internal short-circuit path between the internal first and second nodes N1 and N2, i.e., between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. When the internal short-circuit path is generated, the shunt resistor R4 will control the magnitude of the internal short-circuit current which flows between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B to trip the circuit breaker 15.
In some embodiments, the operation (activation/deactivation) of the actuation switch 124 is controlled by the circuit breaker actuation circuitry 111, wherein the circuit breaker actuation circuitry 111 generates and outputs a control voltage to the base (B) terminal of the actuation switch 124 to activate or deactivate the actuation switch 124. During normal operation of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, the circuit breaker actuation circuitry 111 outputs a control voltage to the base (B) terminal of the actuation switch 124 to maintain the actuation switch 124 in a turned-on state, to maintain the first and second switches 121 and 122 in a turned-off state. When the control circuitry 110 detects a fault condition (e.g., an arc-fault condition detected by the digital signal processor 114), a fault detection control signal is generated and applied to the switch control circuitry 112 and the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111. In response to the fault detection control signal, the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111 generates and outputs a control voltage to the base (B) terminal of the actuation switch 124 to deactivate (turn-off) the actuation switch 124. The deactivation of the actuation switch 124 results in the activation of the internal short-circuit switch (i.e., activation of the first and second switches 121 and 122), which causes an internal short-circuit path to be created between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B (between nodes N1 and N2) of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 with short-circuit current flowing through the shunt resistor R4 that is serially coupled between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B.
More specifically, in some embodiments, the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 operates as follows. During power-up of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 (i.e., when AC mains 10 power is applied across the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100) and normal operation, the circuit breaker actuation circuitry 111 generates and outputs a control voltage to the base terminal of the actuation switch 124 to place the actuation switch 124 in a turned-on state. When the actuation switch 124 is in the turned-on state, the gate (G) and source (S) terminals of the first and second switches 121 and 122 are effectively shunted/shorted, which results in maintaining the first and second switches 121 and 122 of the internal short-circuit switch in a switched-off state. As such, no short-circuit current flows in the path between the internal nodes N1 and N2.
In some embodiments, as noted above, the fourth node N4 serves as a virtual ground node of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120, wherein the voltage VS (e.g., virtual ground voltage) on the node N4 is utilized as a ground reference by the control circuitry 110 (e.g., the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111) to drive the base (B) terminal of the actuation switch 124. More specifically, during normal operation of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, the control circuitry 110 will apply a drive voltage the base (B) terminal of the actuator switch 124 such that a base-to-emitter (VBE) voltage will be at least equal to or greater than the threshold voltage (e.g., 0.7V) of the actuator switch 124. The drive voltage (VBE) that is applied to the base (B) terminal of the actuator switch 124 is generated with reference to the voltage VS of the virtual node N4. When the actuator switch 124 is to be deactivated, the control circuitry 110 will essentially apply the virtual ground voltage VS to the base (B) terminal of the actuator switch 124 (e.g., couple the virtual ground node N4 to the base (B) terminal of the actuator switch 124), which causes the actuation switch 124 to be turned off.
Furthermore, during power-up of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, the switch biasing circuitry 123 operates to charge the capacitor C1 to a maximum voltage which is clamped by the reverse breakdown voltage (referred to as “Zener voltage”) of the Zener diode ZD. In some embodiments, the Zener voltage is in a range of about 10V to about 15V. In particular, during a positive half-cycle of the AC mains 10, current flows along the path through the first resistor R1, the first diode D1, the capacitor C1, the intrinsic body diode 122-1 of the second switch 122, and the shunt resistor R4, to charge the capacitor C1. During a negative half-cycle of the AC mains 10, current flows along the path through the second resistor R2, the second diode D2, the capacitor C1, and the intrinsic body diode 121-1 of the first switch 121 to charge the capacitor C1. Accordingly, during the initial power-up phase of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, one or more cycles of the AC mains 10 causes the capacitor C1 to be charged to the Zener voltage of the Zener diode ZD, which is greater than the threshold voltage, VT, of the first and second switches 121 and 122.
During operation of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, a given circuit block of the control circuitry 110 may detect a fault condition such as short-circuit condition, an over-current condition, an arc-fault condition, etc., as a result of analyzing sensor data obtained from, e.g., the current sensor 105 and/or the voltage sensor circuitry 117. For instance, the digital signal processor 114 may detect the occurrence of an arcing waveform that exists either internally within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 or external (line side or load side) to the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. In response, the control circuitry 110 generates a fault detection signal which triggers the circuit breaker actuator circuitry 111 to generate a control signal to deactivate the actuation switch 124 of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120. The deactivation of the actuation switch 124 results in the activation of the internal short-circuit switch (i.e., activation of the first and second switches 121 and 122), which in turn generates an internal short-circuit path between the nodes N1 and N2, which results in a shunt connection between the line hot terminal 100A and the line neutral terminal 100B of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. The internal short-circuit path which is generated within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 causes over-current to flow through the circuit breaker 15 and thereby trip the circuit breaker 15 and create an air-gap in the electrical path between the line hot 11 of the AC mains 10 and line hot terminal 100A of the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100. The air-gap serves to electrically isolate the line hot 11 of the AC mains 10 from the load 20.
The magnitude of the internal short-circuit current which flows in the internal short-circuit path generated by operation of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 is limited by the resistance value of the shunt resistor R4. In some embodiments, the resistance of the shunt resistor R4 is selected so that a magnitude of the internal short-circuit current which flows in the short-circuit path between the nodes N1 and N2 within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 is in range of about 2× to about 3× the current rating of the circuit breaker 15. For example, if the circuit breaker 15 has a current rating of 20 amperes, the resistance of the shunt resistor R4 is selected so that a maximum of approximately 40 to 60 amperes of current flows through the circuit breaker 15 and through the short-circuit path between the nodes N1 and N2 within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, to thereby cause the circuit breaker 15 to trip. In this regard, the magnitude of the short-circuit current which flows through the circuit breaker 15 is limited by the magnitude of the internal short-circuit current that is generated in the short-circuit path between the nodes N1 and N2 based on the resistance value of the shunt resistor R4. In this instance, the amount of short-circuit current that is generated to trip the circuit breaker 15 is controlled/limited by the shunt resistor R4, which further limits the amount of electrical arcing that is generated between the contacts of the air-gap switch of the circuit breaker 15 when the circuit breaker 15 is tripped.
In the exemplary embodiment of
It is to be understood that intelligent circuit interrupter devices according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosure can be embodied in various devices and applications. For example, in some embodiments, the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 of
It is to be appreciated that the exemplary intelligent circuit interrupter devices and methods as disclosed herein provide various technical advantages. For example, the implementation of the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 allows the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 to rapidly respond to imminent fault conditions such as arc-fault conditions, over-current fault conditions, load-side short-circuit fault conditions, internal fault conditions, ground-fault conditions, over-voltage conditions, etc., by rapid deactivation of the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102. Indeed, the response time for deactivating the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 to isolate a fault condition can be on the order of 1000 times faster than the response time associated with the automatic tripping of an electromechanical AC switch of a conventional circuit breaker to isolate a fault condition such as a short-circuit or over-current condition (e.g., which is on the order of several milliseconds), as the solid-state state bidirectional switch 101/102 can transition from a switched-on state to a switched-off state on the order of microseconds or nanoseconds.
Moreover, as noted above, the implementation of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100 advantageously provides a cost-effective solution to provide AFCI protection (and other protections such as ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection) for the entire branch circuit connected to the circuit breaker 15, despite the circuit breaker 15 not having AFCI functionality. For example, in an existing electrical distribution system which comprises conventional circuit breakers which provide no AFCI protection to branch circuits within a given home or building, an intelligent circuit interrupter device such as shown in
Furthermore, the implementation of the internal short-circuit switch circuitry 120 within the intelligent circuit interrupter device 100, which is configured to generate a controlled short circuit current to trip a conventional circuit breaker having a mechanical AC air-gap switch, provides a mechanism to create an air-gap in the electrical path between the line hot 11 of the AC mains 10 and the load 20 to provide complete isolation of the AC mains 10 from the load 20 and prevent the flow of current from the line hot 11 to the load 20, as well as prevent the flow of leakage current that can be generated by the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 when the bidirectional solid-state switch 101/102 is in a switched-off state. This enables compliance with electrical codes which require the implementation of an air-gap in the electrical path between the AC mains and the branch circuit when a fault condition in the branch circuit occurs.
Although exemplary embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying figures, it is to be understood that the current disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be made therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/964,078, filed on Jan. 21, 2020, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3638102 | Pelka | Jan 1972 | A |
3777253 | Callan | Dec 1973 | A |
4074345 | Ackermann | Feb 1978 | A |
4127895 | Krueger | Nov 1978 | A |
4245148 | Gisske et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4245184 | Billings et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4245185 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4257081 | Sauer et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4466071 | Russell, Jr. | Aug 1984 | A |
4487458 | Janutka | Dec 1984 | A |
4581540 | Guajardo | Apr 1986 | A |
4631625 | Alexander et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4636907 | Howell | Jan 1987 | A |
4649302 | Damiano et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4653084 | Ahuja | Mar 1987 | A |
4682061 | Donovan | Jul 1987 | A |
4685046 | Sanders | Aug 1987 | A |
4709296 | Hung et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4760293 | Hebenstreit | Jul 1988 | A |
4766281 | Buhler | Aug 1988 | A |
4812995 | Girgis et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4888504 | Kinzer | Dec 1989 | A |
5121282 | White | Jun 1992 | A |
5276737 | Micali | Jan 1994 | A |
5307257 | Fukushima | Apr 1994 | A |
5371646 | Biegelmeier | Dec 1994 | A |
5410745 | Friesen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5559656 | Chokhawala | Sep 1996 | A |
5646514 | Tsunetsugu | Jul 1997 | A |
5654880 | Brkovic et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5731732 | Williams | Mar 1998 | A |
5793596 | Jordan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796274 | Willis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5870009 | Serpinet et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5933305 | Schmalz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6081123 | Kasbarian et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111494 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115267 | Herbert | Sep 2000 | A |
6141197 | Kim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160689 | Stolzenberg | Dec 2000 | A |
6167329 | Engel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169391 | Lei | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188203 | Rice et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6300748 | Miller | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6369554 | Aram | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6483290 | Hemminger et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515434 | Biebl | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538906 | Ke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6756998 | Bilger | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6788512 | Vicente et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6813720 | Leblanc | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839208 | Macbeth et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843680 | Gorman | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6906476 | Beatenbough et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6984988 | Yamamoto | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7045723 | Projkovski | May 2006 | B1 |
7053626 | Monter et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7110225 | Hick | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7164238 | Kazanov et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7297603 | Robb et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304828 | Shvartsman | Dec 2007 | B1 |
D558683 | Pape et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7319574 | Engel | Jan 2008 | B2 |
D568253 | Gorman | May 2008 | S |
7367121 | Gorman | May 2008 | B1 |
7586285 | Gunji | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595680 | Morita et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610616 | Masuouka et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7633727 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643256 | Wright et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693670 | Durling et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715216 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729147 | Wong et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7731403 | Lynam et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746677 | Unkrich | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7821023 | Yuan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
D638355 | Chen | May 2011 | S |
7936279 | Tang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948719 | Xu | May 2011 | B2 |
8124888 | Etemad-Moghadam et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8256675 | Baglin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8374729 | Chapel et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463453 | Parsons, Jr. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8482885 | Billingsley et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8560134 | Lee | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8649883 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8664886 | Ostrovsky | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8717720 | DeBoer | May 2014 | B2 |
8718830 | Smith | May 2014 | B2 |
8781637 | Eaves | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817441 | Callanan | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8890371 | Gotou | Nov 2014 | B2 |
D720295 | Dodal et al. | Dec 2014 | S |
8947838 | Yamai et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9054587 | Neyman | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055641 | Shteynberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9287792 | Telefus et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9325516 | Pera et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9366702 | Steele et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9439318 | Chen | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443845 | Stafanov et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9502832 | Ullahkhan et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9509083 | Yang | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9515560 | Telefus et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9577420 | Ostrovsky et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9621053 | Telefus | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9774182 | Phillips | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9836243 | Chanler et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
D814424 | DeCosta | Apr 2018 | S |
9965007 | Amelio et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9990786 | Ziraknejad | Jun 2018 | B1 |
9991633 | Robinet | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10072942 | Wootton et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10101716 | Kim | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10187944 | MacAdam et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10469077 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
D879056 | Telefus | Mar 2020 | S |
D881144 | Telefus | Apr 2020 | S |
10615713 | Telefus et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10645536 | Barnes et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10756662 | Steiner et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10812072 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10812282 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10819336 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10834792 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10887447 | Jakobsson et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10936749 | Jakobsson | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10951435 | Jakobsson | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985548 | Telefus | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10992236 | Telefus et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10993082 | Jakobsson | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11064586 | Telefus | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20020109487 | Telefus et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030052544 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063420 | Pahl et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030151865 | Maio | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040032756 | Van Den Bossche | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040251884 | Steffie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050162139 | Hirst | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050185353 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050286184 | Campolo | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060285366 | Radecker et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008747 | Soldano et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018506 | Paik | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070143826 | Sastry et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159745 | Berberich et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188025 | Keagy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070236152 | Davis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006607 | Boeder et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080136581 | Heilman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151444 | Upton | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174922 | Kimbrough | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180866 | Wong | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204950 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080253153 | Wu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281472 | Podgorny et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090034139 | Martin | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067201 | Cai | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090168273 | Yu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195349 | Frader-Thompson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203355 | Clark | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213629 | Liu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090284385 | Tang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100091418 | Xu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145479 | Griffiths | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145542 | Chapel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156369 | Kularatna et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100188054 | Asakura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100231135 | Hum et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231373 | Romp | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244730 | Nerone | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261373 | Roneker | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284207 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296207 | Schumacher et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100320840 | Fridberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110062936 | Bartelous | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110121752 | Newman, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127922 | Sauerlaender | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156610 | Ostrovsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110273103 | Hong | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292703 | Cuk | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299547 | Diab et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301894 | Sanderford, Jr. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305054 | Yamagiwa et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307447 | Sabaa et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120026632 | Acharya et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120075897 | Fujita | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089266 | Tomimbang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095605 | Tran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133289 | Hum et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120275076 | Shono | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311035 | Guha et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130051102 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057247 | Russell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063851 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066478 | Smith | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130088160 | Chai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119958 | Gasper | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128396 | Danesh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130170261 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174211 | Aad et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130245841 | Ahn et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253898 | Meagher et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261821 | Lu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300534 | Myllymaki | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130329331 | Erger et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140043732 | McKay et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067137 | Amelio et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074730 | Arensmeier et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085940 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096272 | Makofsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140097809 | Follic et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140159593 | Chu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203718 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140246926 | Cruz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266698 | Hall et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268935 | Chiang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276753 | Wham et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150042274 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055261 | Lubick et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150097430 | Scruggs | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150116886 | Zehnder et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150154404 | Patel et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150155789 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180469 | Kim | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150185261 | Frader-Thompson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216006 | Lee et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236587 | Kim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253364 | Hieda et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256355 | Pera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256665 | Pera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150282223 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309521 | Pan | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317326 | Bandarupalli et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355649 | Ovadia | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150362927 | Giorgi | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012699 | Lundy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018800 | Gettings et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035159 | Ganapathy Achari et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057841 | Lenig | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160069933 | Cook et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077746 | Muth et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081143 | Wang | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160110154 | Qureshi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160117917 | Prakash et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160126031 | Wootton et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160178691 | Simonin | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160181941 | Gratton et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160195864 | Kim | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160247799 | Stafanov et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160259308 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160260135 | Zomet et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277528 | Guilaume et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160294179 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160343083 | Hering et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160360586 | Yang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374134 | Kweon et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004948 | Leyh | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170019969 | O'Neil et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170026194 | Vijayrao et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170033942 | Koeninger | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170063225 | Guo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086281 | Avrahamy | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099647 | Shah et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170170730 | Sugiura | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170171802 | Hou et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170179946 | Turvey | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170195130 | Landow et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170212653 | Kanojia et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170230193 | Apte et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244241 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256934 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170256941 | Bowers et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170256956 | Irish et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170277709 | Strauss et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170314743 | Del Castillo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322049 | Wootton et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322258 | Miller et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170338809 | Stefanov et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170347415 | Cho et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170366950 | Arbon | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180026534 | Turcan | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180054862 | Takagimoto et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180061158 | Greene | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180146369 | Kennedy, Jr. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180174076 | Fukami | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180196094 | Fishburn et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180201302 | Sonoda et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180254959 | Mantyjarvi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180285198 | Dantkale et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180287802 | Brickell | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301006 | Flint et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180307609 | Qiang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180342329 | Rufo et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180359039 | Daoura et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359223 | Maier et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190003855 | Wootton et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190020477 | Antonatos et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190028869 | Kaliner | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190036928 | Meriac et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190050903 | DeWitt et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190052174 | Gong | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068716 | Lauer | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190086979 | Kao et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087835 | Schwed et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190104138 | Storms et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190122834 | Wootton et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190140640 | Telefus et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190148931 | Li | May 2019 | A1 |
20190165691 | Telefus et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190207375 | Telefus et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190238060 | Telefus et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190245457 | Telefus et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253243 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190268176 | Pognant | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190280887 | Telefus et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190306953 | Joyce et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190334999 | Ryhorchuk et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190355014 | Gerber | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190372331 | Liu et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200007126 | Telefus et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200014301 | Telefus | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200014379 | Telefus | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200044883 | Telefus et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200052607 | Telefus et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200053100 | Jakobsson | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200106259 | Telefus | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200106260 | Telefus | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200106637 | Jakobsson | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200120202 | Jakobsson et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200145247 | Jakobsson | May 2020 | A1 |
20200153245 | Jakobsson et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200159960 | Jakobsson | May 2020 | A1 |
20200193785 | Berglund et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200196110 | Jakobsson | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200196412 | Telefus et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200260287 | Hendel | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200275266 | Jakobsson | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200287537 | Telefus et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200314233 | Mohalik et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328694 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200344596 | Dong et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200365345 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200365346 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200365356 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200366078 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200366079 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200394332 | Jakobsson et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210014947 | Telefus et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210119528 | Telefus | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210173364 | Telefus | Jun 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
109075551 | Jan 2021 | CN |
0016646 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0398026 | Nov 1990 | EP |
2560063 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2458699 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2010110951 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2016010529 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016110833 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2017196571 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017196572 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017196649 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018075726 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018080604 | May 2018 | WO |
2018080614 | May 2018 | WO |
2018081619 | May 2018 | WO |
2018081619 | May 2018 | WO |
2019133110 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2020014158 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020014161 | Jan 2020 | WO |
PCTUS1954102 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020072516 | Apr 2020 | WO |
PCTUS1967004 | Apr 2020 | WO |
2020131977 | Jun 2020 | WO |
PCTUS2033421 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2020236726 | Nov 2020 | WO |
PCTUS2114320 | Apr 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 17/032,759 filed in the name of Mark D. Telefus et al. on Sep. 25, 2020, and entitled “AC-Driven Light-Emitting Diode Systems.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/047,613 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. on Oct. 14, 2020, and entitled “Intelligent Circuit Breakers.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,753 filed in the name of Mark Telefus on Dec. 8, 2020, and entitled “Solid-State Power Interrupters.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,291 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. on Jan. 9, 2021, and entitled “Building Automation System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,291 filed in the name of Bjorn Markus Jakobsson on Jan. 20, 2021, and entitled “Infrastructure Support to Enhance Resource-Constrained Device Capabilities.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 63/064,399 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. on Aug. 11, 2020, and entitled “Energy Traffic Monitoring and Control System.” |
F. Stajano et al., “The Resurrecting Duckling: Security Issues for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks,” International Workshop on Security Protocols, 1999, 11 pages. |
L. Sweeney, “Simple Demographics Often Identify People Uniquely,” Carnegie Mellon University, Data Privacy Working Paper 3, 2000, 34 pages. |
A. Narayanan et al., “Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2008, 15 pages. |
M. Alahmad et al., “Non-Intrusive Electrical Load Monitoring and Profiling Methods for Applications in Energy Management Systems,” IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference, 2011, 7 pages. |
K. Yang et al. “Series Arc Fault Detection Algorithm Based on Autoregressive Bispecturm Analysis,” Algorithms, vol. 8, Oct. 16, 2015, pp. 929-950. |
J.-E. Park et al., “Design on Topologies for High Efficiency Two-Stage AC-DC Converter,” 2012 IEEE 7th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference—ECCE Asia, Jun. 2-5, 2012, China, 6 pages. |
S. Cuk, “98% Efficient Single-Stage AC/DC Converter Topologies,” Power Electronics Europe, Issue 4, 2011, 6 pages. |
E. Carvou et al., “Electrical Arc Characterization for Ac-Arc Fault Applications,” 2009 Proceedings of the 55th IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, IEEE Explore Oct. 9, 2009, 6 pages. |
C. Restrepo, “Arc Fault Detection and Discrimination Methods,” 2007 Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, IEEE Explore Sep. 24, 2007, 8 pages. |
K. Eguchi et al., “Design of a Charge-Pump Type AC-DC Converter for RF-ID Tags,” 2006 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, F4D-3, IEEE, 2006, 4 pages. |
A. Ayari et al., “ Active Power Measurement Comparison Between Analog and Digital Methods,” International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Software Applications, 2013, 6 pages. |
G. D. Gregory et al., “The Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupter, an Emerging Product,” IEEE, 1998, 8 pages. |
D. Irwin et al., “Exploiting Home Automation Protocols for Load Monitoring in Smart Buildings,” BuildSys '11: Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, Nov. 2011, 6 pages. |
B. Mrazovac et al., “Towards Ubiquitous Smart Outlets for Safety and Energetic Efficiency of Home Electric Appliances,” 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Berlin, German, Sep. 6-8, 2011, 5 pages. |
J. K. Becker et al., “Tracking Anonymized Bluetooth Devices,” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, vol. 3, 2019, pp. 50-65. |
H. Siadati et al., “Mind your SMSes: Mitigating Social Engineering in Second Factor Authentication,” Computers & Security, vol. 65, Mar. 2017, 12 pages. |
S. Jerde, “The New York Times Can Now Predict Your Emotions and Motivations After Reading a Story,” https://www.adweek.com/tv-video/the-new-york-times-can-now-predict-your-emotions-and-motivations-after-reading-a-story/, Apr. 29, 2019, 3 pages. |
K. Mowery et al., “Pixel Perfect: Fingerprinting Canvas in HTML5,” Proceedings of W2SP, 2012, 12 pages. |
S. Kamkar, “Evercookie,” https://samy.pl/evercookie/, Oct. 11, 2010, 5 pages. |
M. K. Franklin et al., “Fair Exchange with a Semi-Trusted Third Party,” Association for Computing Machinery, 1997, 6 pages. |
J. Camenisch et al., “Digital Payment Systems with Passive Anonymity-Revoking Trustees,” Journal of Computer Security, vol. 5, No. 1, 1997, 11 pages. |
L. Coney et al., “Towards a Privacy Measurement Criterion for Voting Systems,” Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research, 2005, 2 pages. |
L. Sweeney, “k-anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 1, No. 5, 2002, 14 pages. |
C. Dwork, “Differential Privacy,” Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security, 2011, 12 pages. |
A. P. Felt et al., “Android Permissions: User Attention, Comprehension, and Behavior,” Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, Jul. 11-13, 2012, 14 pages. |
S. Von Solms et al., “On Blind Signatures and Perfect Crimes,” Computers & Security, vol. 11, No. 6, 1992, 3 pages. |
R. Wyden, “Wyden Releases Discussion Draft of Legislation to Provide Real Protections for Americans' Privacy,” https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-releases-discussion-draft-of-legislation-to-provide-real-protections-for-americans-privacy, Nov. 1, 2018, 3 pages. |
M. Rubio, “Rubio Introduces Privacy Bill to Protect Consumers While Promoting Innovation,” https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2019/1/rubio-introduces-privacy-bill-to-protect-consumers-while-promoting-innovation#:%7E:text=Washingt%E2%80%A6, Jan. 16, 2019, 2 pages. |
C. Dwork et al., “Differential Privacy and Robust Statistics,” 41st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2009, 10 pages. |
J. Camenisch et al., “Compact E-Cash,” Eurocrypt, vol. 3494, 2005, pp. 302-321. |
D. L. Chaum, “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, No. 2, Feb. 1981, pp. 84-88. |
J. Camenisch et al., “An Efficient System For Nontransferable Anonymous Credentials With Optional Anonymity Revocation,” International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, May 6-10, 2001, 30 pages. |
M. K. Reiter et al., “Crowds: Anonymity For Web Transactions,” ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 1, 1997, 23 pages. |
I. Clarke et al., “Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System,” International Workshop on Designing Privacy Enhanching Technologies: Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, 2001, 21 pages. |
P. Golle et al., “Universal Re-encryption for Mixnets,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Feb. 2004, 15 pages. |
Y. Lindell et al., “Multiparty Computation for Privacy Preserving Data Mining,” Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, May 6, 2008, 39 pages. |
J. Hollan et al., “Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, No. 2, Jun. 2000, pp. 174-196. |
A. Adams et al., “Users are Not the Enemy,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1999, 6 pages. |
A. Morton et al., “Privacy is a Process, Not a Pet: a Theory for Effective Privacy Practice,” Proceedings of the 2012 New Security Paradigms Workshop, Sep. 2012, 18 pages. |
G. D. Abowd et al., “Charting Past, Present and Future Research in Ubiquitous Computing,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, No. 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 29-58. |
W. Mason et al., “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk,” Behavior Research Methods, Jun. 2011, 23 pages. |
G. M. Gray et al., “Dealing with the Dangers of Fear: The Role of Risk Communication,” Health Affairs, Nov. 2002, 11 pages. |
L. Shengyuan et al., “Instantaneous Value Sampling AC-DC Converter and its Application in Power Quantity Detection,” 2011 Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Jan. 6-7, 2011, 4 pages. |
H.-H. Chang et al., “Load Recognition for Different Loads with the Same Real Power and Reactive Power in a Nonintrusive Load-monitoring System,” 2008 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Apr. 16-18, 2008, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/153,280 filed in the name of Bjorn Markus Jakobsson on Jan. 20, 2021, and entitled “Infrastructure Support to Enhance Resource-Constrained Device Capabilities.” |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210226441 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62964078 | Jan 2020 | US |