The present invention relates to an intelligent communications network tap.
Communication networks are important for providing data and voice communication. Monitoring networks is important to ensure reliable operation, fault detection, timely mitigation of potentially malicious activities, and more. Network taps are generally known in the art for connecting to networks and providing a port to monitor the communication traffic on the network.
Conventional network taps may be configured to provide network traffic to an independent monitor such as a network analyzer, an intrusion detection system or intrusion prevention system, and so forth. However, conventional network taps do not provide real-time display on the tap that may be used by systems administrators and network technicians to quickly and easily understand network traffic loads and patterns. The lack of real-time display may, in some examples, hinder ready detection of network problems. For example, damaging spikes may strike and pass before useful detection and analysis can occur.
Further, network communication management devices may be, in some conventional systems may be accomplished locally, or through dedicated connections. In locally concentrated networks, dedicated management tools may be effective. However, as is often the case, networks may be physically remote or spread across a wide geographic area. When remote networks are being managed, web-based and SNMP enabled management tools may provide more effective and immediate network management by providing a general access protocol that is readily available. Still further, even where local access is required, new and innovative methods of accessing, for example, a bank of network monitors by a wireless connection may be desirable.
Still further, conventional systems utilize a single network interface card (NIC) for accessing a network. Where full-duplex monitoring is required, at second NIC or a dual channel NIC may be utilized to tap into each side of a tapped full-duplex connection. However, additional NICs may further complicate configurability and flexibility. Further, costs associated with redundant equipment may be undesirable.
Consequently, there is need for an improved intelligent communications network tap that provides real-time network traffic information.
The foregoing and other features, aspects, and advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein:
The present invention provides an improved intelligent communications network tap that provides real-time network traffic information.
The invention is described with reference to specific architectures and protocols. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the description is for illustration and to provide the best mode of practicing the invention. The description is not meant to be limiting. For example, reference is made to Ethernet Protocol but other protocols can be used in the invention. Wire and optical transport technologies can be used in the invention including Gigabit and 10 Mega bits per second (Mbps) or 100 Mbps, often denoted as 10/100. Likewise, reference is made to packets and cells, while other forms of data and addresses can be used in the invention.
A. Architecture and Operation
Device interface terminals 110 and 112 may be coupled with tap structure 122. In some embodiments, tap structure 122 may be configured to aggregate network feeds from devices 102 and 104. In conventional systems, a full-duplex monitoring system having a network tap requires two NICs (or a dual channel NIC)—one interface for each side of a tapped full-duplex connection. Tap structure 122, as described herein, aggregates network feeds. Aggregated streams are then regenerated and sent to monitor interface terminals 114 and 116. Each monitor interface terminal may then be coupled with a network monitor device 106/108. Thus, tap structure 122 may be configured to communicate full-duplex network traffic between devices 102 and 104. Tap structures may also provide other services in embodiments of the present invention such as, for example, heartbeat, matrix switch, regenerator switch, ling aggregator, and 10/100 gigatap. Furthermore, any number of network monitor devices may be utilized without departing from the present invention such as, for example, network analyzers, intrusion detection systems, intrusion prevention systems, remote monitors, and probes.
In order to facilitate and enhance network traffic management, a memory buffer 124 may be coupled with the tap structure and configured to temporarily store data. Memory buffers may be useful in a scenario where a network data burst temporarily exceeds the tap structure's ability to support the network traffic. In one aspect, the memory buffer includes portions dedicated to each of the devices, e.g., 32 MB per side. In some embodiments, such a memory buffer is a first-in-first-out (FIFO) memory that may be configured to automatically clears itself when the traffic volume drops back to the receiving capacity of a network interface card (NIC). In some embodiments, the size of the memory buffer is approximately 256 MB.
A display structure 118 may also be coupled to the tap structure 122 in some embodiments. In one example, display structure 118 is an LCD display of 2×20 characters. Aspects of the invention include graphical display modes and other displays, e.g., bars and graphs that can provide additional technical and diagnostic information. Display 118 may show, for example, network parameters corresponding to a network feed such as: instantaneous percent utilization of network capacity, average percent utilization of network capacity, highest peak percent utilization of network capacity, and time of highest peak percent utilization of network capacity network traffic in terms of percent bandwidth utilization. Additional examples of network parameters may include: traffic types, particular origin and/or destination addresses, fault conditions, etc. Network parameters may be updated periodically and displayed for a network technician to read at any time. In some embodiments display parameters can be cycled, for example, by displaying a parameter for a pre-determined period of time and then cycling through selected parameters continuously. In one aspect, a button may be provided to allow a user to select a network parameter for display. In another aspect, the selection and management of the display parameters is performed by a management device.
Intelligent network tap port aggregator 100 may be managed from a number of device structures. In order to provide managing capabilities, a network controller 126 may be coupled with tap structure 122. Network controller 126 may be configured to provide communication between tap structure 122 and a variety of managing devices via several managing device interfaces (i.e. 128, 130, and 132). For example, net interface 128 may be configured to send and receive data over a web based device 134 thus enabling a browser based web manager. Further, net interface 128 may be configured to send and receive data over an SNMP enabled device 134. Each of these devices may provide local as well as remote control of intelligent network tap port aggregator 100. Communication protocols for providing web based control and SNMP control are generally well-known in the art and may be utilized without limitation without departing from the present invention.
In one aspect of the invention, device 134 is an administrative terminal (e.g. computer terminal) with a user interface for a network technician to manage intelligent network tap port aggregator 100. An administrative terminal connected to the intelligent network tap port aggregator may perform a number of functions including: (a) setting and modifying tap parameters based on user requirements; (b) setting and modifying tap display and LED parameters based on customer requirements; (c) recording network statistics based on customer requirements; and (d) alerting network technicians in the event of an alarm condition with a notification message (e.g. by on-screen information, e-mail, page, or other communication technique). Additional settings and monitoring are anticipated.
In another embodiment, command line interface 130 may be configured to send and receive data over a serial enabled device 136. Command line instructions may provide for local configuration and management of intelligent network tap port aggregator 100. Still further, in another embodiment, wireless interface 132 may be configured to send and receive data over a wireless enabled device 138. In one embodiment, wireless communication may be configured using an IEEE 802.11b protocol. As may be appreciated, any suitable wireless protocol may be utilized without departing from the present invention. Wireless management, as described herein, allows a technician to wirelessly access an intelligent network tap port aggregator within a suitable proximity such that security may be preserved.
In some embodiments, an LED array 120 may also be coupled with tap structure 122. As may be appreciated, an LED array may comprise one or more light emitting diodes (LED) illuminated in response to network conditions. LED arrays may include any number of colored elements. For example, a green LED may be utilized to indicate that a particular network parameter is within allowable limits or below a pre-selected threshold. A yellow LED may be utilized to indicate that a particular network parameter is borderline or at a pre-selected threshold. Further, a red LED may be utilized to indicate that a particular network parameter is above allowable limits or above a pre-selected threshold (e.g. an alarm condition). In one embodiment, the network parameter may correspond to network capacity. Other network parameters along with corresponding thresholds may be selected as well using managing devices as described above without departing from the present invention.
In one embodiment, intelligent network tap port aggregator 100 further includes a redundant power supply (not shown) for increased reliability. For example, if one power source fails, another redundant power supply is automatically switched to ensure uptime. LED array 120 may be configured to indicate which power supply is active so that a fault can be quickly identified and repaired without lowing power to the tap and without loss of data to the monitor.
B. Methodology
At a next step 204, the method sends network packets to memory. Memory buffer is useful in a scenario where a network data burst temporarily exceeds the tap structure's ability to support the network traffic. In one aspect, the memory buffer includes portions dedicated to each of the devices, e.g., 32 MB per side. In some embodiments, such a memory buffer is a first-in-first-out (FIFO) memory that may be configured to automatically clears itself when the traffic volume drops back to the receiving capacity of a network interface card (NIC). In some embodiments, the size of the memory buffer is approximately 256 MB. As noted above, in some embodiments, more than one network feed may be utilized. As such, memory may be segmented and configured such that each segment may be dedicated to a particular network feed thus receiving packets only from that network feed.
At a next step 206, network packets may be analyzed. As may be appreciated, analysis may include generating network parameters corresponding to a network feed such as: instantaneous percent utilization of network capacity, average percent utilization of network capacity, highest peak percent utilization of network capacity, and time of highest peak percent utilization of network capacity network traffic in terms of percent bandwidth utilization. Additional examples of network parameters may include: traffic types, particular origin and/or destination addresses, fault conditions, etc. Network parameters may be updated periodically and displayed for a network technician to read at any time. In some embodiments, selected network parameters may be displayed locally.
At a next step 210 the method determines whether the memory buffer has been exceeded by a packet. That is, whether a received packet will cause a memory overflow condition. If the method determines that the memory buffer is exceeded, then the packed may be dropped at a step 212. Thereafter, the method, at a step 214, sends a message notification such as an alarm. In some embodiments, the method may illuminate an LED array in response to an alarm condition. The method then logs the event at a step 216 and continues to a step 202 to receive network packets.
If, at a step 210, the method determines that the memory buffer has not been exceeded, the method continues to a step 218 to aggregate network traffic. As noted above, more than one network feed may be utilized. Aggregation combines two network feeds into a single aggregated stream. Aggregation is generally well-known in the art and may be utilized without limitation without departing from the present invention.
After network traffic is aggregated, the method then sends the aggregated traffic to a number of monitor interface terminals. Monitor interface terminals may be accessed by independent monitor devices that may be utilized to determine the status of the network. Any number of independent monitors may be utilized without departing from the present invention such as, for example, network analyzers, intrusion detection systems, intrusion prevention systems, remote monitors, and probes. After aggregated traffic is sent to a number of monitors, the method returns to a step 202 to receive network packets.
At a next step 304, the method determines whether a pre-selected threshold has been exceeded. As may be appreciated, network capacity may be subject to hardware limitations, software limitations, or both. In one embodiment, a network threshold may be a configurable parameter. In other embodiments, network thresholds may be configurable remotely. As may be appreciated, exceeding network capacity may result in an unacceptable increase in errors due to, for example, dropped or lost packets. As such, thresholds may represent a percentage of usage, an absolute number of packets sent, or any other measure of network traffic flow without departing from the present invention. If the method determines, at a step 304, that a pre-selected threshold has been exceeded, the method continues to a step 306 to send a message notification such as an alarm. In some embodiments, the method may illuminate an LED array in response to an alarm condition. The method then logs the event at a step 308 and continues to a step 302 to receive network traffic.
At a next step, 404, the method determines whether network capacity has been exceeded. As may be appreciated, network capacity may be subject to hardware limitations, software limitations, or both. In one embodiment, network capacity may be a configurable parameter. In other embodiments, network capacity may be configurable remotely. As may be appreciated, exceeding network capacity may result in an unacceptable increase in errors due to, for example, dropped or lost packets. If the method determines at a step 404 that network capacity is exceeded, the method continues to drop traffic at a step 406 whereupon a notification message such as an alarm may be sent at a step 408. In some embodiments, the method may illuminate an LED array in response to an alarm condition. The method then logs the event at a step 410 and continues to a step 402 to receive network traffic.
C. Implementation
Second embodiment 536 may further include monitoring devices 538 and 540. As noted above, any number of network monitor devices may be utilized without departing from the present invention such as, for example, network analyzers, intrusion detection systems, intrusion prevention systems, remote monitors, and probes. Those skilled in the art will appreciate the utility of flexible networking arrangement for managing network segments. As may be seen second embodiment 536 may monitor network traffic for a variety of network elements including local network 548 and local servers 546.
As may be appreciated, advantages of embodiments of the present invention may include, for example:
1. Provide critical data without complex setup. Embodiments described may be connected with each half-duplex link that is to be aggregated;
2. Display real-time network parameters as described above;
3. Monitor all aggregated network fees including physical layers;
4. Manage embodiments remotely through web based services, SNMP applications, and TMS applications; and
5. Provide readily visible status indicators through use of an LED array.
D. Conclusion
Variations in the disclosed embodiments are anticipated. For example, this invention and related technology is applicable to a wide range of products. These other products may or may not have memory, may have more than three ports, or maybe less than three ports, etc.
Advantages of the invention include the ability to provide full-duplex monitor access to a network in order that the network can be monitored and also that the tap can display network parameters to the network technicians.
Having disclosed exemplary embodiments and the best mode, modifications and variations may be made to the disclosed embodiments while remaining within the subject and spirit of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation application and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to a commonly assigned application entitled “Intelligent Communications Network Tap Port Aggregator,” by Matityahu et al., application Ser. No. 11/370,487, filed on Mar. 7, 2006, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,760,859 B2 on Jul. 20 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/659,512 filed Mar. 7, 2005, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/709,371 filed on Aug. 17, 2005, which are all incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4802161 | Byars et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5173794 | Cheung et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5648965 | Thadani et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5710846 | Wayman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715247 | Nara et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5781318 | Tremblay | Jul 1998 | A |
5825775 | Chin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5887158 | Sample et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5983308 | Kerstein | Nov 1999 | A |
6041037 | Nishio et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047321 | Raab et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6108310 | Wilkinson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6167025 | Hsing et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6272136 | Lin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6366557 | Hunter | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6424627 | Sørhaug et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449247 | Manzardo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6650803 | Ramaswami et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658565 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687009 | Hui et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687847 | Aguilera et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714976 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6798740 | Senevirathne et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801940 | Moran et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823383 | MacBride | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6836540 | Falcone et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841985 | Fetzer | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6882654 | Nelson | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898630 | Ueno et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914892 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925052 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944437 | Yang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975209 | Gromov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7027437 | Merchant et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7171504 | Ishii | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7277957 | Rowley et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7308705 | Gordy et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321565 | Todd et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324553 | Varier et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7415013 | Lo | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7477611 | Huff | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486624 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7486625 | Matityahu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505416 | Gordy et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7573896 | Wang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7616587 | Lo et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7760859 | Matityahu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788365 | Foster et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7953839 | Sim et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20010040870 | Ohmori et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020003592 | Hett et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023184 | Paul | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026374 | Moneymaker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032880 | Poletto et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020061027 | Abiru et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073199 | Levine et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087710 | Aiken et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110148 | Hickman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020176355 | Mimms et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180592 | Gromov | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030112760 | Puppa et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142666 | Bonney et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145039 | Bonney et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147385 | Montalvo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184386 | Varner et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215236 | Manifold | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040023651 | Gollnick et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040062556 | Kubo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096227 | Bulow | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109411 | Martin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120259 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128380 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040190547 | Gordy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202164 | Hooper et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215832 | Gordy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236866 | Dugatkin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264494 | Kim | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005031 | Gordy et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060535 | Bartas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071711 | Shaw | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108444 | Flauaus et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122910 | Parupudi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129033 | Gordy et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132051 | Hill et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050213512 | Konuma et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231367 | Bellantoni | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050257262 | Matityahu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271065 | Gallatin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060083268 | Holaday et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083511 | Edmunds et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060153092 | Matityahu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200711 | Schondelmayer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215566 | Walsh | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233115 | Matityahu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282529 | Nordin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002754 | Matityahu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070002755 | Matityahu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070002769 | Matityahu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064917 | Matityahu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081549 | Cicchetti et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070081553 | Cicchetti et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070171908 | Tillman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171966 | Light et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080014879 | Light et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049627 | Nordin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080214108 | Beigne et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090040932 | Matityahu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041051 | Matityahu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090168659 | Matityahu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090279541 | Wong et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100146113 | Matityahu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001-197066 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2006148686 | Jun 2006 | JP |
10-2004-0058415 | Jul 2004 | KR |
WO-0219642 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2004012163 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Search Report”, Issue in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/25436; Mailing Date.: Mar. 4, 2008. |
“Written Opinion”, Issue in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/25436; Mailing Date.: Mar. 4, 2008. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/25436; Mailing Date: May 22, 2008. |
“International Search Report”, Application No. PCT/US2006/25437, Mailing Date: Dec. 6, 2006. |
“Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2006/25437, Mailing Date: Dec. 6, 2006. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/025437; Mailing Date: Jan. 17, 2008. |
“International Search Report”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072484; Mailing Date: Feb. 13, 2009. |
“Written Opinion”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072484; Mailing Date: Feb. 13, 2009. |
“International Search Report”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072493; Mailing Date: Feb. 13, 2009. |
“Written Opinion”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072493; Mailing Date: Feb. 13, 2009. |
“International Search Report”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/080598; Mailing Date: May 26, 2009. |
“Written Opinion”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/080598; Mailing Date: May 26, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,195, Mailing Date: Dec. 27, 2010. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Application No. PCT/US06/25436, Mailing Date: May 22, 2008. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072484; Mailing Date: Feb. 18, 2010. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072493; Mailing Date: Feb. 18, 2010. |
“European Search Report”, Issued in EP Patent Application No. EP 08 17 1759, Mailing Date: Jul. 31, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,668, filed Dec. 27, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/925,626, filed Oct. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,233, filed Aug. 7, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,228, filed Aug. 7, 2007. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: May 29, 2008. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: Dec. 10, 2008. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,477, Mailing Date: Jun. 12, 2008. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,238, Mailing Date: Oct. 1, 2008. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,487, Mailing Date: Mar. 25, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,233, Mailing Date: Jun. 9, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,487, Mailing Date: Jun. 11, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: Sep. 15, 2009. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: Jun. 24, 2010. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,032, Mailing Date: Apr. 23, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,487, filed Mar. 7, 2006. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,233, Mailing Date: Oct. 30, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,233, Mailing Date: Jun. 25, 2010. |
“Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/965,668, Mailing Date: Oct. 8, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/834,448, Mailing Date. Feb. 7, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/834,448, Mailing Date: Mar. 4, 2009. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/834,448, Mailing Date: Dec. 9, 2009. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/834,448, Mailing Date: Feb. 18, 2010. |
“Application as Filed”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,195, filed Feb. 12, 2010. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,228, Mailing Date: Sep. 9, 2010. |
“Network Status Display”, Belkin International, Inc., 2007, 2 pages total. |
HP, et al., “Reduced Gigabit Media Independent Interface (RGMII)”, Nov. 30, 2005, http://web.archive.org/web/20051113015000/http://www.hp.com/rnd/pdfs/RGMIIv2—0—final —hp. Pdf. |
Wikipedia, “Field-programmable Gate Array”, Jan. 21, 2005, http://web.archive.org/web/20050121193052/http://en.wi kiped ia.org/wiki/Field-programmable—gate—array. |
Xilinx, “LogiCore OPB Ethernet Lite Media Access Controller”, v1.01b, Mar. 3, 2006. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: Apr. 28, 2011. |
“Fast Ethernet Fiber-to-Fiber Converters”, Canary Communications, Inc. 7 pages total, 2004. |
“Sequence reducer/ Sequence Mirror Operator's Guide”, Peribit Networks, Inc. 13 pages total. 2001-2005. |
“PeriScope Central Management System (CMS) 5.0 Administrator's Guide”, Peribit Networks, Inc. 13 pages total. 2003-2004. |
“VSS Coppertap Literature”, VSS Monitoring Inc. 2 pages. 2003-2004. |
“VSS Easy Install Guide”, VSS Monitoring Inc. 8 pages total. 2003-2005. |
“VSS Linksafe”, VSS Monitoring Inc., 1 page. 2003-2005. |
Anonymous, “100Base-TX/100BBase-FX Media Converters E-100BTX-FX-04 User's Guide”, Transitions Networks, Inc. Coypright 1998-2000, 4 pages. |
“Replacement Statement and Explanation under 37CFR 1.915 In Support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent 7,486,625”, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, Jan. 22, 2010, 251 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent 7,486,625”, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, Dec. 18, 2009, 69 pages. |
Gigamon Systems LLC, “GigaVUE—Product Brief”, Gigamon Systems LLC, http://web.archive.org/web/20070815021951/www.gigamon.com/pdf/GigamonSystems-OnePageProductBrief.pdf, Aug. 15, 2007, 1 page. |
“Inter Partes Reexamination Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,318, Patent in Re-examination: 7,486,625, Mailing Date: Apr. 23, 2010. |
“International Search Report”, PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/026158, Mailing Date: Nov. 30, 2011. |
“Written Opinion” PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/026158, Mailing Date: Nov. 30, 2011. |
“Non Final Office Action” U.S. Appl. No. 12/174,404, Mailing Date: Apr. 2, 2012. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: Mar. 27, 2012. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/174,033, Mailing Date: Jan. 11, 2012. |
“Examination Report”, EP Patent Application No. EP 08 17 1759, Mailing Date: Jun. 8, 2012. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/036,842, Mailing Date: Oct. 17, 2012. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,760, Mailing Date: Oct. 4, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100278052 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60659512 | Mar 2005 | US | |
60709371 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11370487 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 12839373 | US |