1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to converter circuits and more specifically to a control circuit for reducing the dead time between conduction of high side and low side FETs in such circuit.
2. Description of the Related Art
In DC to DC conversion, “good converters” are measured according to the converter efficiency. Efficiency is determined in accordance with fewest power losses in the converters, such as switching losses and losses due to the Power Device's ON resistance.
Synchronous rectifiers are commonly used to reduce switching losses, despite their control complexity. In synchronous rectifiers, one of the main contributors of the power losses is the delay between the control of a high-side/control transistor and the low side/synchronous transistor.
The Power Devices Q1 and Q2 are turned ON and OFF as usual with pulse width modulation (PWM), so the control Power Device Q1 is ON for a given time while Power Device Q2 is OFF and, Power Device Q2 turns ON when Power Device Q1 turns OFF. The pulse width modulation is controlled to maintain a predetermined output voltage V0 at the output node even though VIN, which may be supplied by a battery in a portable electronics device, varies with age, temperature, power demand, etc.
Care must be taken to prevent simultaneous turn ON of the Power Devices Q1 and Q2, which would create a short circuit across the input circuit. Thus, as illustrated in
Previous attempts to control the dead time include a fixed delay method illustrated in
An adaptive control method, illustrated in
A predictive control scheme illustrated in
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved solution to providing a fixed delay for any type of rectifier/Power Device by comparing low side gate drive and switch node/high side gate drive edges to achieve optimum dead time to reduce power losses.
It is a further object of the present invention to reduce or eliminate any conduction, reverse recovery, and/or shoot through loss.
A circuit is provided for reducing switching losses in a synchronous rectifier or a switching stage including a high-side control transistor and a low-side synchronous transistor coupled at a switching node, the switching stage receiving an input voltage and providing a controlled output voltage at an output node. The circuit includes a first circuit portion for sensing waveshape edges of a first signal at a gate terminal of the low-side synchronous transistor and a first voltage to determine a delay between the waveshape edge of the first signal and the waveshape edge of the first voltage; and a second circuit portion for calibrating the first signal and the first voltage to align the waveshape edge of the first signal and the waveshape edge of the first voltage.
To further optimize, the circuit can be trimmed to have a fixed delay effect. This dead time control circuit can be applied to all types of power switching devices used in half bridge or synchronous buck configurations.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention that refers to the accompanying drawings.
Returning to
The synchronization of the waveshape edges of the voltage VSW and/or the signal HGD and the waveshape of the signal LGD can be achieved through an analog or digital phase lock loop (PLL) to eliminate phase errors. Thus, as shown in
Using a rising edge of voltage VSW and/or the signal HGD, for example, if there is a non-overlap between the waveshape of the signal LGD and waveshape of the voltage VSW and/or the signal HGD in
The conduction or reverse recovery losses on the synchronous rectifier are disposed of by monitoring the two control signals, the synchronous rectifier control signal of the signal LGD and the voltage VSW and/or the signal HGD. As illustrated in
In the calibration portion, edge compare circuits 34 and 36 compare the signals from the edge delay circuits 26 and 28 to each other and then instruct the pre-settable up/down counter circuits 38 and 40 to advance/pull back the counter. The pre-settable up/down counter circuit 38 receiving input from a rising range select circuit 42 and the pre-settable up/down counter circuit 40 receiving input from a falling range select circuit 44.
An N-bit counter output of the pre-settable up/down counter circuits 38 and 40, which can be pre-loaded to minimize the edge adjustment operation, is forwarded to rising and falling edge DT control circuits 46 and 48. A value of this N bit counter is decoded to select a corresponding delay. Operation of the circuit 20 continues until edges of both the waveshape of the voltage VSW and/or the signal HGD and the waveshape of the signal LGD are aligned.
The circuit 20 compares the two signals and depending on the condition of the timing, a signal to reduce or increase the delay is produced. The delay is adjusted depending on the signal produced. This operation is performed on both, the rising and falling, edges of the control signal. Additionally, a separate delay may be added to this auto calibration to correct any sensing error.
The circuit 20 finds the optimum delay independent of the output condition—load, line temperature, and/or Power Device. The delay can be adjusted by an optional delay during sensing of the edge of the waveform. There is no need for the voltage VSW and/or the signal HGD to go below the ground level for the circuit 20 to operate properly.
Fast Control Signal Sensing for a Synchronous Converter
A capacitor dividers 80a, 80b, illustrated in
The advantages of using the capacitor divider 80 are losses in the speed and DC power. The capacitor divider 80 needs to be charged during the transient period. But, once charged the capacitor divider 80 does not consume any power. For application that require constant DC current, parallel resistor dividers 82a, 82b, having series connected resistors R0 and R1 coupled between nodes LGD and the ground and SW/HGD and the ground, can be added to the capacitor divider to hold the DC voltage value.
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention not be limited by the specific disclosure herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5747972 | Baretich et al. | May 1998 | A |
5986895 | Stewart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6307356 | Dwelley | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6614208 | Narita | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6861826 | Lynch | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7031175 | Dequina et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7436160 | Rusu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446513 | Dikken et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20090033299 | Ishino | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090224732 | Kudo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080298101 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |