The present invention relates to digital media content items and more particularly relates to assigning weights to criteria utilized in a process of scoring media content items for a user.
In today's digital world, the number of digital media content items, such as songs and videos, is enormous. For example, Apple's iTunes® Store currently has a catalog of 6 million songs, 100,000 podcasts, 30,000 audiobooks, 600 TV shows, and 500 movies. Of course, not all of these media content items are of interest to any one user. As such, there is a need for a technique for identifying media content items of interest to a user. In a similar fashion, personal media collections stored on users' personal computers or portable media players have also become large. Thus, there is also a need for prioritizing media content items in a user's personal media collection.
The present invention relates to a technique for intelligently, or programmatically, assigning weights for one or more criterion used to score media content items based on an analysis of a group of media content items. The scores of the media content items may be used to, for example, prioritize media content items in a playlist, make recommendations to a user in an e-commerce system, or the like. In general, scoring criteria to be used to score media content items for a user are defined. A group of media content items associated with the user is then analyzed with respect to the criteria to provide results, such as a number or percentage of media content items from the group of media content items that satisfy each of the scoring criteria. The group of media content items analyzed may be, for example, a media collection of the user, one or more playlists created, owned, or acquired by the user, or a group of media content items otherwise defined by the user. Based on the results of the analysis, a weight is assigned to each of the scoring criteria. Thereafter, media content items are scored for the user as a function of the weights assigned to the scoring criteria.
In another embodiment, a number of criteria are defined. The criteria may be scoring criteria used to score media content items for a user or, alternatively, criteria to be used for analysis. A group of media content items associated with a user is then analyzed with respect to the criteria to provide results such as a number or percentage media content items from the group of media content items that satisfy each of the scoring criteria. The group of media content items analyzed may be, for example, a media collection of the user, one or more playlists created, owned, or acquired by the user, or a group of media content items otherwise defined by the user. The results of the analysis are presented to the associated user. The associated user is then enabled to take an action based on the results such as, for example, viewing a list of media content items from the group of media content items satisfying one or more select criteria from the criteria used for the analysis, re-classify one or more of the media content items from the group of media content items analyzed, or the like, or any combination thereof.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present invention and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention and illustrate the best mode of practicing the invention. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the invention and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
The present invention relates to intelligently, or programmatically, assigning weights for one or more criterion utilized to score media content items. Note that while a “score” is preferably a numerical value, a “score” may be any type of indicator of a degree of relevancy of a media content item to a user. The degree of relevancy may be the degree of similarity between a particular media content item and a user's preferences, likes, or dislikes.
Next, a group of media content items is analyzed with respect to the scoring criteria (step 102). The group of media content items analyzed may be, for example, a media collection of the user, media content items identified by one or more playlists created, owned, or acquired by the user, or a group of media content items otherwise associated with the user, such as a subset of the user's media collection. In one embodiment, the group of media content items is analyzed to determine a number of media content items from the group or a percentage of media content items from the group satisfying each scoring criterion. For example, if the scoring criteria includes the Rock music genre, the Country music genre, and the Alternative music genre, the group of media content items may be analyzed to determine a number or percentage of the media content items from the group classified in the Rock music genre, a number or percentage of the media content items from the group classified in the Country music genre, and a number or percentage of the media content items from the group classified in the Alternative music genre.
Once the analysis is complete, weights are assigned to the scoring criteria based on the results of the analysis (step 104). More specifically, a weight is assigned to each scoring criterion. As used herein, weights may generally be any type of relative values. Preferably, the weights are numerical values. However, the weights may alternatively be other types of relative values such as, for example, “high,” “medium,” and “low,” or the like. In one embodiment, the weights are assigned to the scoring criteria by directly translating the percentage of media content items satisfying each scoring criterion into a weight for that scoring criterion. As an example, assume that the scoring criteria are a number of music genres and the results of the analysis of step 102 are:
As such, the following weights may be assigned:
Note that the weights have been rounded to the nearest whole number in this embodiment where applicable. For example, the weight assigned to the Classical music genre has been rounded up from 0.5 to 1.
Note that a default weight may be used for media content items not satisfying any of the scoring criteria. Where there is a direct translation between the percentage of media content items satisfying a scoring criterion and the weight assigned to that scoring criterion, the default weight may be scaled in order to prevent those media content items from being scored too highly. For example, the default weight may be one-half of the highest weight assigned to any of the scoring criteria.
In another embodiment, weights may be assigned to the scoring criteria by assigning a maximum weight to the scoring criteria having the greatest number of media content items or the greatest percentage of media content items from the group associated therewith. The weight for each of the remaining scoring criteria may then be determined as a function of a ratio of the number or percentage of media content items for the remaining scoring criteria to the number or percentage of media content items for the scoring criteria having been assigned the maximum weight. As an example, assume that the scoring criteria are a number of music genres and the results of the analysis of step 102 are:
As such, the following weights may be assigned:
In this example, the weight (weightCRITERION) assigned to the music genres has been computed as:
where number_of_media_content_itemsCRITERION is the number of media content items satisfying the scoring criterion and number_of_media_content_itemsMAX is the number of media content items satisfying the scoring criterion having the greatest number or percentage of media content items. The “round” function rounds to the nearest whole number. Thus, for example, the weight for the Classical music genre has been computed as:
In this example, the GUI 10 also includes a field 76 enabling the user to select whether weights are or are not to be programmatically assigned to the music genres 16-34 based on an analysis of the user's music collection, or library. As discussed above, the user's music collection is only one example of a media content item group. Other groups may be, for example, media content items identified by one or more playlists created or otherwise acquired by the user, media content items identified by the user such as a subset of the user's media collection, or the like, or any combination thereof.
In this example, the GUI 10 also includes a field 126 enabling the user to select whether weights are or are not to be programmatically assigned to the decades 78-92 based on an analysis of the user's music collection, or library. As discussed above, the user's music collection is only one example of a media content item group. Other groups may be, for example, media content items identified by one or more playlists created or otherwise acquired by the user, media content items identified by the user such as a subset of the user's media collection, or the like, or any combination thereof.
More specifically, for each media content item to be scored, metadata or information describing the media content item is compared to the scoring criteria in order to identify one or more scoring criterion that are satisfied by the media content item. For example, for a song, the metadata may include information such as a music genre for the song, an artist of the song, an album on which the song was released, a date of release of the song, and the like. Thus, if the scoring criteria includes a number of genres and decades of release, the music genre of the song and the decade in which the song was released may be identified as scoring criteria that are satisfied by the song. The metadata describing the media content item may be stored in and thus obtained from the headers of the same digital file, an associated application file or database, a remote server, or the like. Once the satisfied scoring criteria are identified, the media content item is scored as a function of the weights assigned to the satisfied scoring criteria. Thus, returning to the example, the score for the song may be generated as a function of the weights assigned to the corresponding music genre and decade. For example, the score may be a product or sum of the weights assigned to the corresponding music genre and decade.
Once the media content items are scored, an action may be taken based on the scores of the media content items (step 202). The action taken depends on the implementation. For example, the scores may be utilized to prioritize or sort songs in a playlist, generate a playlist, prioritize media content items identified by recommendations received in a social recommendation system or network, identify recommendations for the user, or the like. Further, the scoring process may be implemented on any type of computing system such as, for example, a server hosting a music distribution service, a user device, or the like. For example, a music distribution service such as, for example, Apple's iTunes® Store may score songs, movies, and/or television shows as discussed above and recommend those having a score above some threshold level to the associated user. As another example, a number of songs in a user's music collection may be scored using the scoring process described above. Playback of the songs may then be prioritized, and optionally automatically effected, based on the scores of the songs. In addition or alternatively, one or more playlists may be generated based on the scores of the songs.
As a final example, the scoring process discussed herein may be used in a social recommendation system such as that disclosed in commonly owned and assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/484,130, entitled P2P NETWORK FOR PROVIDING REAL TIME MEDIA RECOMMENDATIONS, which was filed on Jul. 11, 2006 and is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In this social recommendation system, when a first peer device plays a media content item, it sends a recommendation identifying that media content item to one or more associated peer devices via a peer-to-peer (P2P) network. Likewise, as each of the associated peer devices play media content items, they send recommendations identifying those media content items to the first peer device. In response to receiving recommendations from the associated peer devices, the first peer device may score the recommended media content items and, optionally, locally stored media content items as discussed herein. Playback of the recommended media content items and, optionally, the locally stored media content items may then be programmatically, or automatically, effected based on the scores. Note that the P2P network may be established over a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), or a combination thereof. Further, when established via a WAN, the recommendations may be exchanged via a central server.
It should be noted that the scoring criteria discussed above may or may not be the only criteria used for the scoring process. Additional criteria may be used such that media content items are scored based on the scoring criteria and the weights assigned to the scoring criteria discussed above as well as additional criterion and their associated weights. As an example, in a social recommendation system, such as the one described in commonly owned and assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/484,130, it may be desirable to score recommended media content items based scoring criteria such as genre and decade as well as recommender and source.
The GUI 10 also includes a field 158 enabling the user to select whether weights are to be programmatically, or automatically, assigned to the recommenders 134-144. Again, if the weights are programmatically assigned, they may thereafter be adjusted by the user by utilizing the sliding bars 146-156. In one embodiment, weights are programmatically assigned to the recommenders 134-144 based on a degree of similarity between a user profile of the user and user profiles of the recommenders 134-144. Note that the user profiles may be stored in a central database associated with the social recommendation system, exchanged among the peer devices in the social recommendation system as needed, or the like. The user profiles may include, for example, favorite music genre(s), favorite music artist(s), favorite decade(s), favorite video genre(s), favorite actor(s) or actress(es), or the like, or any combination thereof. In addition or alternatively, the user profiles may include demographic information and/or biographical information describing the users.
The degree of similarity between two user profiles may be determined using any desired scheme. For example, if the user profiles include a favorite music genre, a favorite music artist, a favorite decade, age, and home address, the degree of similarity may be determined as a function of a ratio of a number of matching parameters to a total number of parameters in the user profiles. So, if two users have the same favorite music genre, the same music artist, and the same favorite decade and are of the same age group but live in different geographical areas, the degree of similarity may be ⅘, or 80%.
As one exemplary alternative embodiment, the weights assigned to the recommenders 134-144 may be assigned based on the user's media collection. More specifically, the weight assigned to a particular recommender may be determined as a function of a total number of media content items recommended by that recommender as compared to a number of those recommended media content items that have been purchased or otherwise obtained by the user in response to the recommendations from the recommender, played by the user in response to the recommendations from the recommender, scored above a defined threshold, or the like, or any combination thereof.
While not illustrated, the source tab 130 enables the user to assign weights to each of a number of potential sources for media content items to be scored. For example, the potential sources may be, for example, “local,” “subscription network,” “buy/download,” or “find.” “Local” means that the media content item, or recommended media content item, is included in the user's local media collection. “Subscription” means that the media content item is available via a subscription-based media distribution service, such as Yahoo! Unlimited, to which the user has a subscription. “Buy/download” means that the media content item is available for purchase and download from a media distribution service such as, for example, the iTunes® Store. Lastly, “find” means that the media content item is not part of the user's local media collection, not available via any subscription-based media service to which the user is registered, and not available for purchase or download from any media distribution service with which the user is registered. In this case, a search of other media distribution services, the Internet, or the like may be performed in an attempt to locate the media content item. Weights may be assigned to each of the potential sources manually by the user.
In this embodiment, the scoring function 164 includes a weight generation function 170. However, the weight generation function 170 may alternatively be a separate function. The weight generation function 170 operates to programmatically assign the weights to the scoring criteria in the manner discussed above. More specifically, the weight generation function 170 operates to assign the weights to the scoring criteria based on an analysis of the media collection 166, one or more playlists created by or acquired by the associated user, a number of media content items identified by the user such as a subset of the media collection 166, or the like.
The central server 174 includes a scoring function 184, which is preferably implemented in software. However, the present invention is not limited thereto. The scoring function 184 operates to score media content items for the users associated with the user devices 176-1 through 176-N as a function of scoring criteria and weights assigned to the scoring criteria for each of the users, which are referred to collectively as scoring criteria and weights 186. While the scoring criteria may or may not be the same for each of the users, the weights for the scoring criteria are assigned separately for each of the users.
In this embodiment, the scoring function 184 includes a weight generation function 188. However, the weight generation function 188 may alternatively be a separate function. The weight generation function 188 operates to programmatically assign the weights to the scoring criteria for each of the users in the manner discussed above. More specifically, for each user, the weight generation function 188 operates to assign the weights to the scoring criteria for that user based on an analysis of a group of media content items associated with that user. The group of media content items may be, for example, the media collection 182-1, 182-N of that user, one or more playlists created by or acquired by that user, a number of media content items identified by that user such as a subset of the media collection 182-1, 182-N of that user, or the like.
The scoring function 184 may score various media content items depending on the particular implementation. In one embodiment, the scoring function 184 operates to score the media content items in the media collections 182-1 through 182-N of the users, media content items in one or more playlists created or otherwise acquired by the users, subsets of the media collections 182-1 through 182-N of the users, or the like. In order to enable the scoring, the user devices 176-1 through 176-N may provide information identifying the media content items to be scored and, optionally, metadata describing those media content items to the central server 174. Note that the central server 174 may store or otherwise have access to metadata describing the media content items, in which case only information identifying the media content items to be scored needs to be provided from the user devices 176-1 through 176-N to the central server 174.
In addition or alternatively, the scoring function 184 may score media content items identified by recommendations received by or to be provided to the user devices 176-1 though 176-N as part of a social recommendation system. Note that, in one embodiment, the user devices 176-1 through 176-N may be part of a social recommendation system, and the central server 174 may provide a proxy function for communicating recommendations between the user devices 176-1 through 176-N. In this case, the scoring function 184 may score the recommendations prior to sending the recommendations to their destinations.
In another embodiment, the central server 174 may be part of a media distribution service. In this embodiment, the weights for the scoring criteria may additionally or alternatively be determined based on an analysis of media content items previously downloaded and/or purchased by the users of the user devices 176-1 through 176-N from the music distribution service. The scoring function 184 may score media content items available from the media distribution service in order to make recommendations to the users. More specifically, for each user, the available media content items, or some subset thereof, are scored based on the scoring criteria and weights for the user. The music distribution service may then recommend media content items having scores above a threshold value or media content items having the M highest scores to the user.
While
Note that while the process of
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5581704 | Barbara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5616876 | Cluts | Apr 1997 | A |
5706435 | Barbara et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5754939 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758347 | Lo et al. | May 1998 | A |
5857207 | Lo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870764 | Lo et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5890152 | Rapaport et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5918223 | Blum et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6192340 | Abecassis | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195657 | Rucker et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201176 | Yourlo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236990 | Geller et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6438579 | Hosken | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6493762 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498955 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6636836 | Pyo | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657116 | Gunnerson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6757691 | Welsh et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785688 | Abajian et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6865600 | Brydon et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6933433 | Porteus et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937730 | Buxton | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941324 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7000188 | Eustace | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7028082 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7096234 | Plastina et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096486 | Ukai et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7143241 | Hull | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146627 | Ismail et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7185355 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7200852 | Block | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7283992 | Liu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296285 | Jun et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7321923 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7360160 | Matz | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7403787 | Helferich | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7496623 | Szeto et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7504576 | Georges | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529743 | Ershov | May 2009 | B1 |
7567525 | Liao et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570943 | Sorvari et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580932 | Plastina et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7614006 | Molander | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7680959 | Svendsen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693906 | Amidon et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7720871 | Rogers et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7941764 | Svendsen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8005841 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8059646 | Svendsen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010021914 | Jacobi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010023401 | Weishut et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020002483 | Siegel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002899 | Gjerdingen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019858 | Kaiser et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020037083 | Weare et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052873 | Delgado et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073167 | Powell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082901 | Dunning et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087565 | Hoekman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099697 | Jensen-Grey | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103796 | Hartley | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129168 | Kanai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138630 | Solomon et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020157096 | Hane et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194285 | Mousseau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199194 | Ali | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005047 | Seki et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014407 | Blatter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033347 | Bolle et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045953 | Weare | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045954 | Weare et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055516 | Gang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055657 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066068 | Gutta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089218 | Gang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135513 | Quinn et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140123 | Master et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160770 | Zimmerman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191753 | Hoch | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217055 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233241 | Marsh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236582 | Zamir et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019608 | Obrador | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030832 | Squibbs | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078383 | Mercer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093466 | Hull | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128286 | Yasushi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139059 | Conroy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158870 | Paxton et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160971 | Krause et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040254911 | Grasso et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021420 | Michelitsch et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038819 | Hicken et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071221 | Selby | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076056 | Paalasmaa et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108233 | Metsatahti et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120053 | Watson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050158028 | Koba | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177516 | Vandewater et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177568 | Diamond et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187943 | Finke-Anlauff et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192987 | Marsh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197961 | Miller et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234995 | Plastina et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240661 | Heller et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246740 | Teraci | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256756 | Lam et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267944 | Little et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278364 | Kamen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278758 | Bodleander | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283791 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004923 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010167 | Grace et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020538 | Ram | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020662 | Robinson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020962 | Stark et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026048 | Kolawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032363 | Platt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064721 | Del Val et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069769 | Dacosta | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083119 | Hayes | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100978 | Heller et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112082 | Platt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117260 | Sloo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129544 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167991 | Heikes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173910 | McLaughlin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195512 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195514 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195790 | Beaupre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218187 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224435 | Male et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230065 | Plastina et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240868 | Kaplan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241901 | Hanus et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242178 | Butterfield et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242661 | Bodlaender et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254409 | Withop | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271959 | Jacoby et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277098 | Chung et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288074 | Rosenberg | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005795 | Gonzalez | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011095 | Vilcauskas et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011150 | Frank | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025194 | Morse et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033419 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053268 | Crandall et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078832 | Ott, IV et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078895 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089057 | Kindig | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094215 | Toms et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118802 | Gerace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124325 | Moore et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130207 | Pate et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152502 | Kinsey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162502 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169148 | Oddo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208802 | Barman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220100 | Rosenberg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255797 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265979 | Hangartner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266049 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266402 | Pawlak et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271287 | Acharya et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282472 | Seldman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288546 | Rosenberg | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005301 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016205 | Svendsen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040474 | Zuckerberg et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052371 | Partovi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059422 | Tenni et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059576 | Liu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062318 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091771 | Allen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126191 | Schiavi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133601 | Martin Cervera et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134039 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134053 | Fischer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140717 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141315 | Ogilvie | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147482 | Messing et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147711 | Spiegelman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189295 | Khedouri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195657 | Naaman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201446 | Svendsen | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208823 | Hicken | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209482 | Meek et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222546 | Mudd et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243733 | Black | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250067 | Svendsen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080301118 | Chien et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307316 | Askey | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006368 | Mei et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006374 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042545 | Avital et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046101 | Askey et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049030 | Svendsen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049045 | Askey et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055385 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055396 | Svendsen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055467 | Petersen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055759 | Svendsen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076881 | Svendsen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077499 | Svendsen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083116 | Svendsen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083117 | Svendsen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083362 | Svendsen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090119328 | Raza et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129671 | Hu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144325 | Chastagnol et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144326 | Chastagnol et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090254572 | Redlich et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100005116 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063975 | Hayes | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20120041902 | Svendsen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042245 | Askey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1383328 | Dec 2002 | CN |
1841385 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1686497 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1791130 | May 2007 | EP |
0177907 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0184353 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0221335 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03019560 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2004017178 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2005038666 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005038666 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005052814 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006075032 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007032003 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007044389 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007092781 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090138505 A1 | May 2009 | US |