The present invention is generally directed to intelligent end user devices for use with a clearinghouse service in an Internet telephony system. More specifically described, the present invention is directed to proxy-based, direct communication, and hybrid proxy/direct model architectures for clearinghouse services in an Internet telephony system supporting communications with intelligent end user devices.
Internet telephony clearinghouse services have been designed and developed for telephony services (voice and facsimile) delivered by gateways—devices that bridge Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and Internet Protocol (IP) networks. A typical call scenario is supported by the clearinghouse services architecture 100 of
A key characteristic of this architecture is that all access to the clearinghouse services relies on gateways. Gateway operators are the sole users of clearinghouse services; existing services are not visible to, or directly accessible by, end users.
There is a need to extend the clearinghouse architecture to support intelligent end user devices, such as personal computers, IP phones, cable multimedia terminal adapters, and residential gateways. A critical factor in such an expansion is ensuring that the resulting architecture is interoperable with existing clearinghouse services. That will give users of these devices access to existing networks for termination of their calls, and it will provide additional sources of traffic to existing networks.
Three different architectures can accommodate the addition of intelligent end user devices into clearinghouse service networks for an Internet telephony system—proxy-based services, direct communication, and a hybrid proxy/direct communication model.
The present invention provides a proxy-based system for supporting clearinghouse services for a client device in an Internet Protocol (IP) telephony system. The IP telephony system includes at least one client device, a proxy system, such as a proxy server, a service point supporting a clearinghouse service and one or more terminating gateways. Each component is coupled to an IP network, such as the global Internet. To initiate a call communication to a called party, a client application residing at the client device sends a call set-up request to a proxy server. The call set-up request typically comprises a called number for the call communication and user authentication information.
If the client application is a valid user of the services maintained at the proxy server, the proxy server transmits an authorization request to the clearinghouse service running on the service point. The authorization request typically comprises the called number and a call identifier assigned by the proxy server to the call communication.
If the proxy server is a valid user of the clearinghouse services, the service point transmits an authorization response to the proxy server via the IP network. The authorization response typically comprises the identity of one or more terminating gateways coupled to the IP network and available to deliver the call communication. This authorization response may also include an authorization token for each identified terminating gateway.
In response to the authorization response, the proxy server can select one of the terminating gateways to deliver the call communication. In turn, the proxy server transmits a call communication set-up request to the selected terminating gateway via the IP network. This set-up request typically comprises the called number, the call identifier, and the authorization token. If the proxy server is a valid user of the call delivery services of the selected terminating gateway, the selected terminating gateway completes call set-up operations and delivers the call communication to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).
The present invention provides a direct communication model for supporting clearinghouse services for a client device in an IP telephony system. The IP telephony system includes at least one client device executing an intelligent application program, a service point supporting a clearinghouse service and one or more terminating gateways. Each component is coupled to an IP network, such as the global Internet. The user can initiate a call via the client device by entering a telephone number to be called into the client program. In response, the client program can automatically initiate a communication with the clearinghouse service operating at the service point. For example, the client application can transmit an authorization request for a call communication to the clearinghouse service. The authorization request typically comprises a called number for the call communication and a call identifier assigned to the call communication.
If the client application is a valid user of the clearinghouse services, the service point transmits an authorization response to the client application via the IP network. The authorization response typically comprises (1) the identity of one or more terminating gateways coupled to the IP network and available to deliver the call communication and (2) an authorization token for each identified terminating gateway. In response, the client application can select one of the terminating gateways to deliver the call communication. Based on this selection of a terminating gateway, the client application prepares a call communication set-up request and transmits that request to the selected terminating gateway via the IP network. The set-up request typically comprises the called number, the call identifier, and the authorization token. If the client application is a valid user of the call delivery services of the selected terminating gateway, the gateway will deliver the call communication via the PSTN to the called number.
The present invention provides a hybrid proxy/direct communication model for supporting clearinghouse services for a client device in an IP telephony system. The IP telephony system includes at least one Web-enabled client device, a proxy system, such as a proxy server, a service point supporting a clearinghouse service and one or more terminating gateways. Each component is coupled to an IP network, such as the global Internet. To initiate a call communication, a client application running on the Web-enabled client device transmits a call set-up request to a proxy server. The call set-up request typically comprises a called number for the call communication and user authentication information.
If the client application is a valid user of the services maintained at the proxy server, then the proxy server transmits an authorization request to the clearinghouse service running on the service point. The authorization request typically comprises the called number and a call identifier assigned to the call communication. If the proxy server is a valid user of the clearinghouse services, the service point transmits an authorization response to the proxy server via the IP network. The authorization response typically comprises (1) the identity of one or more terminating gateways coupled to the IP network and available to deliver the call communication and (2) an authorization token for each identified terminating gateway.
In response to the authorization response, the proxy server can route the identity of each terminating gateway and each authorization token to the client application via the IP network. In turn, the client application can select one of the identified terminating gateways to support the completion of the call communication. Based on this selection of a terminating gateway, the client application sends a call communication set-up request to the selected terminating gateway via the IP network. The set-up request typically comprises the called number, the call identifier, and the authorization token. If the client application is a valid user of the call delivery services of the selected terminating gateway, the selected terminating gateway delivers the call communication to the called number via the PSTN.
The present invention provides clearinghouse services architectures that support the use of intelligent end user devices, such as personal computers, Internet Protocol (IP) phones, cable multimedia terminal adapters, and residential gateways, in an Internet telephony system. By the use of the present invention, a user can operate an intelligent end user device to access a clearinghouse service on an existing IP network. This enables the user to communicate a telephony call over the IP network and via the combination of a terminating gateway and the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). The present invention supports three separate architectures, namely a proxy-based system model, a direct communication model, and a hybrid proxy/direct communication model. Each of the clearinghouse architectures will be described in more detail below in connection with the illustrations shown in
Proxy-Based Model
End user devices can be incorporated into a clearinghouse service architecture through proxy systems. Proxy-based services interpose a proxy system between an end user device and a terminating gateway. Proxy systems typically include H.323 gatekeepers, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) proxy servers, and proprietary devices.
A proxy-based model is fundamentally the same architecture as the existing phone-to-phone architecture; proxy-based architectural elements have exact analogs in the phone-to-phone case:
The call scenario of
The proxy-based architecture 200 shown in
The terminal 205 supports the operation of a client application that is configured to communicate with the proxy server 210 via the IP network 220. To initiate an outgoing call to a called party, the user can enter the telephone for the called party at the client application operating on the terminal 205. In response, the terminal 205 transmits call-related information, including the called number, to the gatekeeper 210. The call-related information can include end-user authorization information and authentication information to support a determination of whether the user is authorized to complete an Internet telephony call via the proxy server 210. The proxy server 210 completes the user validation task and, based upon validation of the user, transmits an authorization request to the service point 215 via the IP network 220. This authorization request initiates a clearinghouse service operation by the service point 215. The authorization request typically includes the called number and a call identifier to support a secure identification of the proxy server 210 as an authorized user of the clearinghouse service maintained by the service point 215.
In response the to authorization request, the service point 215 determines whether the proxy server 210 is an authorized user of the clearinghouse services. If so, the service point 215 identifies each terminating gateway 225 that can accept the call to the called party from the calling party at the terminal 205. In turn, the service point 215 can transmit an authorization response to the proxy server 210 via IP Network 220. The authorization response typically comprises the identity of each available terminating gateway and an authorization token for each identified terminating gateway. The identity of each terminating gateway is typically the IP address for the gateway.
In response to the authorization response, the proxy server 210 can select an identified terminating gateway 225 and set-up a call for handling by the selected terminating gateway. The set-up operation is typically completed by the proxy server 210 as an H.323 protocol set-up task and includes a communication comprising the call identifier, the authorization token for the identified terminating gateway and the called number. Although the proxy-based architecture shown in
The proxy server 210 initiates the set-up operation by sending a set-up request to the selected terminating gateway 225. The selected terminating gateway 225 will process the set-up information, including the call identifier, the authorization token, and the called number, to determine whether to accept completion of the call. The selected terminating gateway 225 will determine whether the authorization token is valid and has been issued by a known and verified clearinghouse service. In addition, the selected terminating gateway 225 will determine whether the thorization token has expired or remains within the time period authorized for completion of the call. The selected terminating gateway 225 also will determine whether the call number and the call identifier match the call information contained in the authorization token issued by the clearinghouse service. Based upon a positive response to this set of queries, the selected terminating gateway 225 will respond to the set-up communication by issuing an set-up acknowledgment to the proxy server 210. The selected terminating gateway 225 will decline the processing of the call based upon a determination that the call information forwarded by the proxy server 210 is invalid.
In response to issuing the set-up acknowledgement, the terminating gateway 225 will complete the call communication to the called umber via PSTN 230: When the call is terminated by the called party at the telephone handset 235, the selected terminating gateway 225 can report the call duration to the clearinghouse service operating at the service point 215 via IP network 220. The service point 215 can confirm receipt of the call usage information by sending a confirmation message to the selected terminating gateway 225.
To complete a call in the proxy-based architecture illustrated in
In step 315, the client application completes a set-up operation with the proxy server by communicating user authorization and authentication information to the proxy server via the IF network. Typical information includes a password assigned to the end-user, namely the calling party, and call payment information, such as a calling card number. The client application is preferably programmed to complete transmission of set-up to the proxy server without manual assistance by the end-user.
In step 320, represented by the client application, the proxy server completes an inquiry to determine whether the calling party is a valid user of the calling services at the proxy server. If the response to the inquiry is negative, the “NO” branch is followed from step 320 to step 325 and the call is terminated. Otherwise, the “YES” branch is followed to step 330. The proxy server transmits in step 330 an authorization request to a clearinghouse service server, such as a service point coupled to the IP network. The authorization request typically includes the called number and the call identifier.
In step 335, the clearinghouse service server responds to the authorization request by completing a determination of whether the proxy server is valid and authorized to access the clearinghouse services maintained at the service point. If the proxy server is not authorized to access the services, the call is terminated at step 340. A positive response to the inquiry in step 335 results in the clearinghouse service server transmitting an authorization response to the proxy server in step 345. The authorization response typically includes an identity of one or more terminating gateways to handle the call from the end-user. In addition, the authorization response can include an authorization token for each identified terminating gateway.
The clearinghouse service server supports clearinghouse services for an Internet telephony system and is further described in a pending U.S. patent application assigned to the assignee of the present application, Ser. No. 09/154,564 entitled “Internet Telephone Call Reporting Engine” filed on Sep. 16, 1998. The subject matter of the '564 application is hereby fully incorporated within by reference.
In step 350, the proxy server selects one of the identified terminating gateways and completes a set-up operation with a selected terminating gateway. The set-up request issued by the proxy server typically comprises a call identifier, an authorization token for the selected terminating gateway, and the called number. The set-up communications between the proxy server and the selected terminating gateway can be compatible with the H.323 protocol, the SIP protocol, or other known protocols.
In step 355, the selected terminating gateway responds to the set-up request by completing a set-up operation to determine whether the proxy server is valid and has proper access to the services maintained by the terminating gateway. For example, the terminating gateway determines whether the authorization token has been issued by a known and valid clearinghouse service and is within the expiration period for a call communication. In addition, the selected terminated gateway can compare the called number and the call identifier to information maintained in the authorization token to determine whether the call-related information is valid. If the response to the inquiry in step 355 is negative, the “NO” branch is followed to 360 and the call is not accepted by the selected terminating gateway. If, on the other hand, the response to the inquiry in step 355 is positive, the “YES” branch is followed to step 365 and the terminating gateway issues a set-up acknowledgement to the proxy server. The selected terminating gateway also processes the call to the called number via the PSTN for communication to the called party.
In step 370, the selected terminating gateway determines whether the call has been terminated by a called or calling party. If the response to the inquiry in step 370 is negative, the “NO” branch loops back to step 370 to initiate the monitoring task again. If call service has been terminated, “YES” branch is followed from step 370 to step 375. The selected terminating gateway in step 375 reports the call duration to the clearinghouse service server via the IP network. In response, the clearinghouse service server transmits in step 780 a call termination confirmation to the selected terminating gateway via the IP network. This supports the proper invoicing of a party responsible for payment of the call service supported by the proxy-based architecture for a clearinghouse service in an Internet telephony network.
Direct Communication Model
The direct communication model eliminates the need for a proxy system by enabling end user devices to communicate directly with terminating gateways. In effect, the end user device acts as the combination of an originating gateway and calling user's telephone.
The direct communication model requires that end user devices themselves are interoperable with the clearinghouse services (and with terminating gateways). End user devices must be able to enroll with a clearinghouse service. Although this requirement is feasible for end user devices based on personal computer platforms, it may be problematic for other devices. Simple clients (such as PDAs, for example), however, may not have the processing power to efficiently implement the cryptographic components of a clearinghouse service.
Unlike proxy-based services, the direct communication model results in end users becoming customers of clearinghouse services. The sales, marketing, and support issues of this approach may be accommodated through a third-party sales agent. Other aspects are more fundamental, however, as this model can significantly increase both the number of customers and the number of enrolled devices, while at the same time reducing the average transaction volume per customer and per device.
For the direct communication architecture shown in
The client program operating at the device 405 can select a terminating gateway for handling the call and issues a set-up request to that selected gateway via the IP network 415. This set-up request and the corresponding response by the selected terminating gateway can be implemented by the H.323 protocol or the SIP protocol. If the selected terminating gateway 420 determines that the application program at the device 405 is an authorized user of its services, the terminating gateway will issue a set-up acknowledgment message to the device 405 via the IP network 415. In turn, the selected terminating gateway 420 can communicate the call to the called party at the telephone handset 430 via the PSTN 425.
An inquiry is conducted by the clearinghouse service server in step 520 to determine whether the client application is valid and authorized to access the clearinghouse services. If the response to this inquiry is negative, the “NO” branch is followed from step 520 to step 525. The call service is terminated by the clearinghouse service server in step 525. If, on the other hand, the response to the inquiry in step 520 is positive, the “YES” branch is followed from step 520 to step 530. The clearinghouse service server transmits an authorization response in step 530 to the client application residing at the end user device via the IP network. The authorization response typically includes an identification of one or more available terminating gateways and an authorization token for each terminating gateway.
In response to the authorization response, the client application can select one of the identified terminating gateways to process the call on behalf of the end user. The client application completes the selection of the terminating gateway in step 535 based upon the list of available terminating gateways identified by the clearinghouse service server. The client application also issues in step 535 a set-up request to the selected terminating gateway to initiate the call processing operation. The set-up request can be formatted as an H.323-compatible or a SIP request. The set-up request typically comprises the call identifier, the authorization token for the selected terminating gateway and the called number.
In step 540, the selected terminating gateway determines whether the client application is valid and authorized to access its call handling services. The validation process typically includes a determination of whether the authorization token has been issued by a known and valid clearinghouse service and whether the authorization token is within the expiration period. In addition, the terminating gateway can complete a comparison of the called number and the call ID to the authorization token to determine whether the call-related information matches content encoded within the authorization token. If the response to the inquiry in step 540 is negative, the “NO” branch is followed to step 545 and the terminating gateway terminates all call-related operations. If, on the other hand, the response to the inquiry in step 540 is positive, the terminating gateway can initiate a call to the called number via the PSTN in step 550.
In step 555, the selected terminating gateway conducts a monitoring operation to determine whether the call has been terminated by one of the parties to the call. If not, the “NO” branch is followed from step 555 to step 550 to begin the monitoring process anew. If the call has been terminated, the “YES” branch is followed from step 555 to step 560. The selected terminating gateway reports the call duration to the clearinghouse service server in step 560. The clearinghouse service server can confirm termination of the call by sending a usage confirmation message to the selected terminating gateway via the IP network.
Hybrid Proxy/Direct Communication Model
A third architectural model for end user devices combines aspects from both proxy-based and direct communications approaches. This hybrid model relies on a proxy system, but allows the end user device to contact terminating gateways directly.
Because the end user receives routing and authorization from a web server, the end user is forced to visit the web site for each call. As a tool for enhancing “stickiness,” the entire application may be positioned as a service for web sites (especially portals) more than for end users. Also, effective integration with other features of the web site (e.g. contact managers) may allow convenience to overcome some of the objections based on the relatively poor quality of the personal computer multimedia experience.
The requirements for a hybrid architecture include the existence of appropriate interoperable proxies (e.g., devices that can communicate with clients and with clearinghouse services) and end user devices that are directly interoperable with terminating gateways. It may also be the case in this approach that the proxy server cannot return an accurate usage report. If that is true, then the clearinghouse service operator must rely strictly on the terminating gateway's usage details.
The web-enabled device 605 can initiate a call by transmitting a call request to the web server 610. In response, the web server 610 completes call authorization tasks with the service point 615 via the IP network 620. The service point 615 maintains the clearinghouse service and is responsible for identifying available terminating gateways to accept an incoming call and to authorize call operations supported by the web browser 610 and the web-enabled device 605. For a verified call communication, the web server 610 can respond to the authorization response issued by the service point 615 by transmitting call routing the information and an authorization token to the web-enabled device 605. The web-enabled device 605 can complete call set-up operations with an identified terminating gateway 625 via the IP network 620. In response to the completion of set-up operations, the selected terminating gateway 625 can process the call for delivery to the called party at the telephone handset 635 via the PSTN 630.
In step 725, the proxy server transmits the authorization request to the clearinghouse service server. The clearinghouse service server responds in step 730 by determining whether the proxy server is valid and authorized to access the clearinghouse services maintained by the service point. The authorization request issued in step 720 by the proxy server is the first indication received by the clearinghouse service that a party desires to initiate a call via the IP network. Consequently, there is a need at the service point to securely identify the proxy server as a valid user of the clearinghouse services for processing the call-related information provided by the proxy server. If the clearinghouse service cannot verify that the proxy server is a valid user of its services, the call is terminated at step 735. If the response to the inquiry in step 730 is positive, the clearinghouse service server transmits to the proxy server in step 740 the identity of one or more available terminating gateways and an authorization token for each identified gateway. This authorization response typically comprises a list of IP addresses for the available terminating gateways and an authorization token for processing each identified terminating gateway.
In step 745, the proxy server launches a client application at the web-enabled device. The Web server can accomplish the launching of the client application by dynamically constructing a Web page to launch the client. For example, the “Call to: URL” command can be used to create a link to a selected terminating gateway. The “Call to: URL” command can be used with Microsoft's “NET MEETING” protocol to create the link and to provide the authorization token and the call identifier to the client application. The user at the Web-enabled device can launch the client application by “clicking” or otherwise selecting the link to the selected terminating gateway.
In step 750, the client application at the web-enabled device can complete call set-up operations with the identified terminating gateway. The typical H.323 set-up operation includes the transmission of a call identifier, an authorization token, and a called number to the selected terminating gateway via the IP network. This set-up request can be formatted to comply with the H.323 protocol or the SIP protocol.
In step 755, the selected terminating gateway conducts an inquiry to determine whether the set-up request issued by the client application represents a valid call service request. The terminating gateway typically validates the client application by determining whether the authorization token has been issued by a known and valid clearinghouse service and is within the expiration period. In addition, the selected terminating gateway can compare the called number and the call identifier to information encoded within the authorization token to determine whether a match exists for a valid client application. If the response to the inquiry in step 755 is negative, the “NO” branch is followed from step 755 to step 760 and the call is terminated. If the selected terminating gateway verifies that the call service request has been issued by a valid client application, the “YES” branch is followed to step 765.
In step 765, the selected terminating gateway completes the call to the called number via the PSTN.
In step 770, the selected terminating gateway monitors the completed call to determine whether a call service has been terminated by a party to the call. If the response to this monitoring task is negative, the “NO” loop is followed back to step 770 to continue monitoring operations. If, on the other hand, the call has been terminated, the selected terminating gateway can report the call duration to the clearinghouse service server via the IP network in step 775. In turn, the clearinghouse service server, can transmit a call termination confirmation in step 780 to the selected terminating gateway.
In view of the foregoing, it will be understood that the present invention provides clearinghouse services architectures that support the use of end user devices, such as personal computers, IP phones, cable multimedia terminal adapters, and residential gateways, in an Internet telephony system. A user can operate an “intelligent” end user device. i.e., a device running a client program with knowledge of the architecture particulars, to access a clearinghouse service on an IP network. This enables the user to communicate a telephony call over the IP network and via the combination of a terminating gateway identified by the clearinghouse service and the PSTN. Significantly, the use of an intelligent end user device means that the user does not require direct access to architecture information necessary to communicate with the clearinghouse service; this information is maintained at the client application or a proxy. In addition, the present invention includes the forwarding of an authorization token to a selected terminating gateway by either a client application or a proxy. This authorization token provides an advantageous method for securely verifying that the contacting entity is a valid user of the clearinghouse service. The present invention supports three innovative architectures, namely a proxy-based system model, a direct communication model, and a hybrid proxy/direct communication model.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/141,432 filed Jun. 29, 1999.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4726056 | An et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4979118 | Kheradpir | Dec 1990 | A |
5155763 | Bigus et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5185780 | Leggett | Feb 1993 | A |
5251152 | Notess | Oct 1993 | A |
5325290 | Cauffman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5404516 | Georgiades et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408465 | Gusella et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5434848 | Chimento, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5473630 | Penzias et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5563939 | La Porta et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570417 | Byers et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5581544 | Hamada et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600794 | Callon | Feb 1997 | A |
5606602 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5633919 | Hogan et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638433 | Bubien, Jr. et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5668955 | deCiutiis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675636 | Gray | Oct 1997 | A |
5712907 | Wegner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740361 | Brown | Apr 1998 | A |
5764899 | Eggleston et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790642 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799072 | Vulcan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5892753 | Badt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898668 | Shaffer | Apr 1999 | A |
5898673 | Riggan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5917891 | Will | Jun 1999 | A |
5917897 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917902 | Saucier | Jun 1999 | A |
5943657 | Freestone et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5966427 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991373 | Pattison et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995554 | Lang | Nov 1999 | A |
6005925 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005926 | Mashinsky | Dec 1999 | A |
6049531 | Roy | Apr 2000 | A |
6067287 | Chung-Ju et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084953 | Bardenheuer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085238 | Yuasa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6128280 | Jamoussi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157648 | Voit et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178510 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205211 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229804 | Mortsolf et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240449 | Nadeau | May 2001 | B1 |
6256389 | Dalrymple et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259691 | Naudus | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263051 | Saylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275490 | Mattaway et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304551 | Ramamurthy et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310873 | Rainis et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317490 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330311 | Mijares, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339595 | Rekhter et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345090 | Walker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366577 | Donovan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404746 | Cave et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426955 | Gossett Dalton, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430282 | Bannister et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449646 | Sikora et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459708 | Cox et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477164 | Vargo et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487283 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6526131 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6570870 | Berstis | May 2003 | B1 |
6594254 | Kelly | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611519 | Howe | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614781 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615264 | Stoltz et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615349 | Hair | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636504 | Albers | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658568 | Ginter et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665271 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6680948 | Majd et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687877 | Sastry et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707812 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735177 | Suzuki | May 2004 | B1 |
6751652 | Thomas | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754181 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757823 | Rao et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765896 | Ahmed et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795867 | Ma et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6829243 | Sundhar | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6996093 | Dalton, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017050 | Dalton, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7099301 | Sheu | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20030012178 | Mussman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030095541 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030193933 | Jonas et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040042606 | Zino et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 781 015 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 824 295 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 948 164 | Oct 1999 | EP |
2 301 264 | Nov 1996 | GB |
WO 9714236 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9723078 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9818237 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9836543 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9837665 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9848542 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9911051 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9914931 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9914932 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9926153 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0048102 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0049551 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0052905 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 2006065789 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0147232 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0147235 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0152476 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0163820 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0223854 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2005089147 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ETSI (TR 101 334 V1.1.1, Jan. 1999, 46 pages). |
ETSI (TS 101 321 V1.4.2, Dec. 1998, 44 pages). |
ETSI, “Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON) Release 4; Open Settlement Protocol (OSP) for Inter-Domain pricing, authorization and usage exchange,” ETSI TS 101 321, V4.1.1 (Nov. 2003) Technical Specification, pp. 49. |
Johannesson, Nils Olof, “The ETSI Computation Model: A Tool for Transmission Planning of Telephones Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Jan. 1997, pp. 70-79. |
Netscape Communications Corporation, “Introduction to SSL” Oct. 9, 1998, [Retrieved from Internet May 19, 2004], http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/security/sslin/contents.htm, pp. 12. |
RSA Security Press Release, “TransNexus Integrates Industry Leader RSA Security's BSAFE Encryption Software Into Its ClearIP(SM) Clearinghouse Solution,” Oct. 21, 1999, Abstract XP-002193409, www.rsasecurity.com. |
Sin, Sam-Kit et al., “A New Design Methodology for Optimal Interpolative Neural Networks with Application to the Localization and Classification of Acoustic Transients,” IEEE Conference on Neural Networks for Ocean Engineering, 1991, pp. 329-340. |
TransNexus Home Page, Printed May 17, 2005, www.transnexus.com, 2 pp. |
TransNexus Press Release, “Agis and Popstar Introduce Profit-Generating Internet Fax Services to ISP Partners and Customers Worldwide,” Abstract XP-002193408, Jun. 24, 1999, www.transnexus.com, 3 pp. |
Chaniotakis et al., “Parlay and Mobile Agents in a Homogenized Service Provision Architecture,” IEEE; Universal Multiservice Networks; ECUMN 2002; 2ndEuropean Conference on Apr. 8-10, 2002;pp. 150-154. |
Liao, Wanjun; “Mobile Internet Telephony Protocol: An application layer protocol for mobile Internet telephony services,” Communications, 1999; ICC '99; 1999 IEEE International Conference; vol. 1; Jun. 6-10, 1999; pp. 339-343. |
Maresca et al.; “Internet Protocol Support for Telephony,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, No. 9; Sep. 2004; pp. 1463-1477. |
PCT International Preliminary Report dated Jan. 23, 2006 for International Application No. PCT/US01/28931. |
Thom, “H323: The Multimedia Communications Standard for Local Area Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Dec. 1996, pp. 52-56. |
Rudkin, et al., “Real-time Applications on the Internet,” BT Technology Journal, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1997, pp. 209-225. |
The Ascend Max Voice Gateway, XP-002096239, “The asnet pipeline,” www.asnet.co.nz/pipeline/sum97/tamvg.html, Mar. 11, 1999. |
Hansson, et al. “Phone Doubler—A step towards integrated Internet and telephone communities,” Ericsson Review No. 4, 1997, pp. 142-151. |
AT&T Communications, Adm. Rates and Tariffs, Tariff FCC No. 1, 3rd Revised p. 178.69.1. |
Thom, “H.323: The Multimedia Communications Standard for Local Area Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Dec. 1996, pp. 52-56. |
The Ascend Max Voice Gateway, XP-002096239, “The asnet pipeline,” www.asnet.co.nz/pipeline/sum97/tanvg.html, Mar. 11, 1999. |
Hansson, et al., “Phone Doubler—A step towards integrated Internet and telephone communities,” Ericsson Review No. 4, 1997, pp. 142-151. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150189093 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60141432 | Jun 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13452907 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14558714 | US | |
Parent | 12284467 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13452907 | US | |
Parent | 10811058 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 12284467 | US | |
Parent | 09606574 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 10811058 | US |