1. Technical Field
The field relates to a device of the type hands-free kit for allowing intelligent activation and operation of a wireless radio-frequency remote control.
The application field is the one of remotely controlled electronic devices, and in particular the one of animal training by radio-electronic means.
2. Description of Related Technology
In the context of animal training, a series of radio-frequency control systems intended for training or confining are known that use on the one hand a wireless remote control and on the other hand a receiver for example embedded in a necklace worn by the animal, in particular by a dog. The general purpose of these systems is to remotely transmit stimuli aimed at inducing specific behavior in the animal such as electrical, audio, olfactory, etc. stimulation. See for example: U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,066, JP-A-2000/262174, US-A-2007/191913, U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,133 B2, US-A-2007/204803, U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,077, etc.
In modern training systems for animals, and specifically in dog training, the trainer needs using remote controlled systems having a radio waves range going from 10 m up to a few hundred meters.
Such a kind of system is used to remotely control an assortment of accessories, not limited to electronic training collars, such as bird and ball launchers, food feeders, etc.
In this background, it is often useful for the hunter or the trainer to be able to control his dog while at the same time carrying out one or more other actions that may require the use of both hands.
Moreover, holding a remote control in one's hand for some time, for example whilst walking, may prove uncomfortable in the long run, even if today's remote controls are rather small and light.
As the main issue of using remote controls remains their dimensions, holding a remote control in hand however often prevents carrying out real training tasks such as:
thanking the dog after a suitable behavior,
launching an object,
giving food as a reward to the dog, etc.
This could be a high handicap for the trainer.
Another issue is that the dog, while seeing the remote control, may only correctly react to the trainer's order if the latter actually has the remote control in his hand.
US 2009/0199786 A1 discloses a remote control system for controlling a remote animal collar of the type which includes one or more electrodes or sensors which protrude from the inside surface of the collar for contacting the neck of the animal and electronic devices located within the body of the collar to receive electronic control signals or sensor input and to generate a stimulus, which is transmitted to the animal through the electrodes or by a speaker or other devices on the collar. The remote control system uses a slave transmitter for transmitting slave control signals and a master transmitter for the user's hold on the portable device.
US 2015/0156990 A1 discloses an animal training system for controlling the behavior of the animal including a receiver configured to be worn by the animal, and a hand held transmitter. The hand held transmitter includes a case with a front face, a transmitter circuit within the case for transmitting a wireless signal to the receiver, and an actuator at the front face of the case. The actuator is coupled with the transmitter circuit, and is a non-depressible actuator which is manually movable relative to the case. The actuator, being of the form of a knob, dial, scroller, slide for example, is easily movable relative to the case in a direction which is other than perpendicular to front face. The actuator is coupled with an encoder which provides an output signal to transmitter circuit corresponding to a stimulation level which is applied to the animal, and the transmitter circuit transmits an encoded wireless signal to the receiver.
US 2012/0092170 A1 discloses a gesture-based animal trainer. The gesture-based animal trainer is configured to be used by a person that provides gesture commands to an animal. The term “gesture commands” refers to gestures that are each associated with a respective animal training command, wherein a gesture can be defined as a selected group of movements performed by a person. The gesture-based animal trainer detects whether the person performs a gesture command and provides a stimulus to the animal in accordance with the gesture command. Upon the animal associating the respective stimulus with the gesture command, the gesture-based animal trainer allows the animal to receive the gesture command regardless of whether the person is within the animal's line of sight.
The disclosed technology provides hands-free electronic control kit for remote animal training that overcomes the performance limitations according to prior art. Specifically, the disclosed technology provides a device that allows to operate a wireless remote control without holding this remote control in the hand. Finally, the innovation features of this disclosure provide breaking-through technology to the professional dog trainer.
In an embodiment of the disclosed technology, an intelligent hands-free electronic control kit for animal training is provided, comprising:
The disclosed technology may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the disclosed technology is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit aspects of the disclosed technology to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosed technology.
In order to solve the issues depicted in prior art section above, a first series of embodiments was disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/470,388.
According to these embodiments, the hands-free kit is essentially remotely connected to a button of a specific, well-identified remote control which can actuate accessory devices such as mentioned above. When such a button of the hands-free kit is depressed, it further sends a radio-frequency command, in a low range of a few meters, to the remote control, the remote control translating and further relaying this command to an accessory device at radio-frequency long range (e.g., from about 10 m to a few hundred meters).
According to some embodiments, the hands-free kit comprises a mechanical part enclosing or encompassing a finger of the hand, the index finger in certain embodiments, which will be called in short hereinafter “ring”, but which is not limited to an annular piece of rigid material (see below). The ring comprises, for example, two switches that communicate with the actual remote control. The ring is adapted to be attached to a finger of a hand, for instance the index finger, the thumb then being used to operate the switches. Any type of switch known to those skilled in the art falls within the scope of the disclosed technology (for example, switch under the form of lever, toggle, slide, push-button, dial, touch-sensitive, knob, scroller, etc.).
More specifically, an embodiment of the disclosed technology comprises a hands-free kit for training an animal comprising a ring 1 to be threaded on a finger of the hand, a remote control 2 and a training collar 5 (see
Ring 1, as schematically shown in
Ring 1 comprises a microcontroller 14 with an RF transmitter/receiver module (not shown) and connected to both above-mentioned switches 12, 13, to a battery 15 and to an aerial 16 on the radio transmitter respectively (see
An identification code (ID CODE) can be stored in an EEPROM (not shown) linked to the microcontroller 14 and is unique to each ring 1. With each order transmitted, the ID CODE is stated at the start of the sequence, which allows to differentiate between orders sent by different rings that are close to each other.
The remote control 2 which serves to process the information from the ring 1, according to a bidirectional communication 3 at a short distance, e.g., a few meters, and to send/relay the order to the collar 5, according to a bidirectional communication 4 at a long distance, e.g., a few hundred meters or even one or several kilometers.
More in detail, the remote control 2 comprises a microcontroller 24 with a bidirectional link on the one hand to a user interface 27 and on the other to a RF transmitter/receiver module 25 associated to an aerial 26 for the bidirectional communication 3 with the ring 1 and a RF transmitter/receiver module 25′ associated to an aerial 26′ for the bidirectional communication 4 with the collar 5 (see
Moreover, the remote control 2 may operate on its own, without the ring 1. Therefore, to this end, pairs of switches 22, 22′, etc. can be also fitted to the remote control 2 box (see
Lastly, the collar 5, fitted with traditional training devices or functions, receives information from the remote control 2. It comprises a microcontroller 54 linked on the one hand to an RF transmitter/receiver module 55 connected to an aerial 56 for the bidirectional communication 4 with the remote control 2 and on the other hand to a training system 57 such as for example a high-voltage electric pulse generator or a sound generator (see
The transmitters/receivers used can be integrated (shared electronics and boxes, transceivers) and can use the ZigBee protocol (protocol IEEE 802.15.4).
If the remote control used can control N collars (N being a positive integer), N rings may possibly be linked to it. Now each ring can control one single collar by utilizing the remote control 2. The synchronisation of the ring m (1≦m≦N) with corresponding collar m can occur during a specific programming sequence.
According to one embodiment, the synchronization of the ring with a collar may then be achieved in the following manner: pressing the “hands-free programming” switch 21 of the remote control for a long time sets it in a specific programming mode. Then one presses one of the two switches 22 on the remote control 2 for dog A, for example. Lastly, one presses one of the two switches 12, 13 on the corresponding ring 1. Then this sends (unique) ID CODE of ring 1 to remote control 2. The remote control 2 finally associates this specific ID CODE with dog A and stores that information in its memory.
If a second ring has to be synchronized, the procedure is started again but using the switches 22′ on the remote control 2 for dog B, for example.
Since each order sequence comprises the ID CODE of the transmitting ring, the remote control can pass the command from the ring on to the intended collar. Moreover, if several users who are close to each other are using the same system, there is no risk of interference.
The two switches 12, 13 on the ring 1 generally correspond to two separate commands for the same collar 5 which can be preprogrammed by the remote control 2.
However, the disclosed technology is not restricted to this particular configuration and other configurations known to those skilled in the art may also be used such as, for example, a configuration where the two switches 12, 13 of the above-mentioned pair control two different and distinct collars A and B, respectively.
However this first kind of solution as presented above hardly allows to do only one thing at a time with the hands-free kit, possibly programmed beforehand by the remote controlled, as the hands-free kit switch is generally associated to one corresponding switch of the remote control and acts as substituted to the latter.
In the above embodiments, the risk is then that the finger ring be used as an unintelligent trivial object, by being able to give one and only one order to the remote control.
In modern training however, the user is required to be able to coordinate different orders and/or accessories, in certain embodiments.
The faster the reaction of the dog handler, the better is the training session as the dog can associate an event or an action to an order only if the time between both instants is small, typically less than one second.
According to a second series of embodiments one introduces a difference as how the hands-free kit switch/button is pressed. In some embodiments, this is performed by:
According to one embodiment, different kinds or modes of pressure can be associated to different commands, for example, as shown in
According to another embodiment, the choice between the different functions available can be performed depending on the position/orientation of the hands-free kit in space. To this end a low power accelerometer is embedded in the hands-free kit for estimating its position/orientation. For example, if the hands-free kit button is oriented upwards, the dog collar may work in so-called “electronic dog collar mode”; if it is oriented downwards, the dog collar works in so-called “bird launcher mode” or “ball launcher mode”.
According to still another embodiment, the so-called normal intensity level of stimulation is programmed in advance on (and by) the remote control. This level can be used for the two first kinds of stimulation (flash mode 501 and continuous mode 502). For APS mode 503, the programmed level can be use as initial level. This intensity level can be increased by one step (or more) typically every 300 ms.
Moreover, for each technical training approach, a solution could be found using the hands-free kit with a single push-button:
According to another embodiment, it is provided a button with a pressure level sensor. The higher the pressure on the button, the higher is the level of stimulation. This embodiment must have a calibration system to adjust the pressure level of each user.
At the light of the teaching of U.S. Pat. No. 8,022,522 B2, another way to add intelligence in the hands-free kit disclosed here is for example to use the electrode quality contact measurement provided by the collar through the bidirectional communication between collar and remote control.
In the aforementioned patent it is proposed to retrieve valuable information from the collar towards the remote control, such as:
battery charge level of the collar;
RF communication quality,
ohmic contact quality of the electrodes.
This information could be readable on a display of the remote control.
Alternately, other physical reactions could be triggered on the remote control such as generating a vibration if the RF link is lost or generating sound if no/poor electrode contact is sensed. However, vibration may not be sensitive enough if the remote control is in a pocket of the trainer or sound could not be heard if there is a lot of noise in the training environment (such as dog barking).
According to one embodiment, the existing bidirectional link between the hands-free control device and the remote control can then be used to uplink information feedback to the hands-free control device. As the latter can be held on the finger, vibration can be very sensitive for the user. For example, one can have
in case of lost RF link: generating pulse vibration;
in case of no/poor electrode-skin contact: generating continuous vibration.
As the bidirectional link can be power consuming, due to demodulation of RF signal, so, according to one embodiment, the RF circuit of the hands-free control device can be set in reception only during a few ms after the button has been depressed and the feedback can be transmitted to the user during or just after this short period of time.
According to another embodiment, the remote Control is designed as a compact watch that could be held at the wrist of the trainer. The watch has only two buttons to change the level of stimulation and a single configuration button, serving to link the hands-free control device to the watch. Additionally the watch comprises:
a long range RF link, to collar or other accessories,
a short range link, to hands-free kit.
The user can communicate with the watch from the hands-free control device and for example choose the stimulation mode as explained above. Information as described above and coming back from the collar can be communicated to the user, for example as a vibration felt on the wrist of the user.
While the disclosed technology has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. It will be understood that changes and modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill within the scope of the following claims. In particular, what is disclosed covers further embodiments with any combination of features from different embodiments described above and below.
The terms used in the claims should be construed to have the broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the foregoing description. For example, the use of the article “a” or “the” in introducing an element should not be interpreted as being exclusive of a plurality of elements. Likewise, the recitation of “or” should be interpreted as being inclusive, such that the recitation of “A or B” is not exclusive of “A and B,” unless it is clear from the context or the foregoing description that only one of A and B is intended. Further, the recitation of “at least one of A, B and C” should be interpreted as one or more of a group of elements consisting of A, B and C, and should not be interpreted as requiring at least one of each of the listed elements A, B and C, regardless of whether A, B and C are related as categories or otherwise. Moreover, the recitation of “A, B and/or C” or “at least one of A, B or C” should be interpreted as including any singular entity from the listed elements, e.g., A, any subset from the listed elements, e.g., A and B, or the entire list of elements A, B and C.
1. hands-free electronic control device
2. wireless remote control
3. bidirectional telecommunication channel
4. bidirectional telecommunication channel
5. electronic receiver accessory
11. ring
12. switch
13. switch
14. microcontroller
15. battery
16. aerial
21. hands-free programming switch
22. switch
22′. switch
24. microcontroller
25. RF transmitter/receiver module
25′. RF transmitter/receiver module
26. aerial
26′. aerial
27. user interface
54. microcontroller
55. RF transmitter/receiver module
56. aerial
57. training system
101. single short press on switch
102. consecutive short presses on switch
103. continuous press on switch
501. flash stimulus
502. continuous stimulus
503. automatic progressive stimulus
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08447027.7 | May 2008 | EP | regional |
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/470,388, filed May 21, 2009, which claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/055,876, filed May 23, 2008, and European Patent Application No. EP08447027.7, filed May 23, 2008, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference, in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61055876 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12470388 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 15091514 | US |